Continental Care And Rehabilitation

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

35.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 59 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 62.8% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 43 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.72 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 92% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 22% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 100 beds and averages 86.5 residents a day — about 86% occupied, or roughly 14 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.03 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.79 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.63 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.38 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.29 on weekdays — 21% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.94 to 0.42 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 60% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

32 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 21 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2026-06-04 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents with indwelling urinary catheters received care to prevent urinary tract infections; failed to identify a root cause of repeated urinary tract infections for 2 (#s 6 & 9); and failed to follow up timely with urology referrals and appointments for 1 (# 9) of 19 sampled residents. Findings include1. Review of resident #9's medical record showed three hospitalizations occurring in 2026. Review of resident #9's hospital Discharge summary, dated [DATE] - 1/22/26 showed:- Diagnoses: Sepsis due to catheter associated Morganella morganii UTI with bilateral hydronephrosis .- Follow up Recommendations for PCP: Close follow-up with urology .Review of resident #9's hospital Discharge summary, dated [DATE] - 4/17/26 showed:-Diagnoses: Sepsis due to catheter associated Pseudomonas UTI with bilateral hydronephrosis-Follow up Recommendations for PCP: Once daily acetic acid irrigation ordered but can increase to 3 times daily if needed. This is an…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-06-04 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to have a consistent process for finding or replacing missing clothing, and the resident had missing clothing, for 1 (#3) of 19 sampled residents. Findings include: During an interview on 6/2/26 at 10:30 a.m., NF1 stated, There was a time when the laundry machine was down and so the facility was taking clothing to the laundromat. NF1 stated all of resident #3's stuff disappeared. NF1 stated she came to visit and resident #3 was wearing a bra, a shirt and had a blanket on her lap. There were no pants in her entire room. NF1 stated all of resident #3's clothing was clearly labeled with her name, including each individual sock. NF1 stated the facility did not replace any of the missing clothing.During an interview on 6/3/26 at 9:09 a.m., staff member B stated if a resident reported something was missing facility staff would check against the resident's inventory sheet and start investigating. If the item was unable to be located the facility would replace it to the best of their ability.A request was made on 6/3/26…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-06-04 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that a resident (#32) was free from physical abuse from another resident (#62) of the 19 sampled residents. The facility identified the failure and corrected it on 5/11/26, which was before the start of the survey period. This deficient practice is cited as past noncompliance. This failure had the potential to cause resident #32 physicial and or psychosocial harm. Findings include:During an observation on 6/1/26 at 3:54 p.m., resident #62 was sitting in her room with the light off and there was no noise. Resident #62 was unable to verbalize or answer questions.Review of a facility-reported incident dated 3/15/26, showed: [Resident #32's initials] reported that [Resident #62] hit him on the arm. No injuries noted and resident appears to be at baseline. Incident reported to family and provider. Order received to send accused party to the acute (hospital) for evaluation. Investigation initiated. [sic]During an interview with staff members N and M on 6/4/26 at 7:35 a.m., staff member N stated, We could…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · D2026-06-04 · tag F0627 — isolated
  Ensure the transfer/discharge meets the resident's needs/preferences and that the resident is prepared for a safe transfer/discharge.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to identify a resident had left the facility AMA and failed to inform the resident of the risks of leaving the facility AMA and their rights for 1 (#17) of 21 sampled and supplemental residents. This deficient practice put the resident at risk for a negative medical outcome. Findings include:Review of resident #17's Comprehensive MDS dated [DATE], showed: section C, Cognitive Patterns: BIMS Summary Score (C0500), 12 (Moderate Impairment). During an interview on 6/1/26 at 4:49 p.m., NF4 stated resident #17 never wanted to be at the facility and wanted to leave. NF4 stated that resident #17 had threatened to leave the facility AMA (Against Medical Advice) at one point and eventually did. NF4 stated, I am unsure of the facility's policy on AMA discharge, but there was no documentation filled out when she left.During an interview on 6/2/26 at 3:03 p.m., staff member O stated the facility's process for when a resident leaves is to have the resident sign out at…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-06-04 · tag F0628 — isolated
  Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a resident or resident representative with notice of bed hold or transfer/discharge, which could lead to the resident not knowing their rights for 1 (#10) of 21 sampled and supplemental residents. Findings include:Review of nursing progress notes dated 5/17/26, showed resident #10's family requested resident #10 be sent to the hospital and an ambulance was called for transport.Review of resident #10's electronic medical record failed to show the facility provided resident #10 or their representative with a notice of bed hold or transfer/discharge before the ambulance picked resident #10 up for transport to the hospital.During an interview on 6/3/26 at 4:30 p.m., staff member M stated staff would usually go up to the hospital and have the resident sign the bed hold and transfer notices, and that did not get done with resident #10 since she was sent to a hospital out of town. During an interview on 6/4/26 at 10:15 a.m., staff member A stated the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-03-04 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain a sanitary kitchen by covering a hole in the floor where plumbing was being fixed with plywood, which was an uncleanable surface, and the wood could not be maintained for cleanliness. This failure could affect any resident receiving food from the kitchen. Findings include:During an observation and interview on 3/3/26 at 11:08 a.m., the [NAME] end of the kitchen had two, four by eight-foot sheets of bare plywood laying on the floor over areas where the tile was missing. The sheets of plywood had areas of various shades of black staining on them and the tile floor around the plywood had scattered debris and white/gray stains on it. Staff member E stated maintenance had to dig holes under the flooring to fix the drainpipes. Staff member E further stated the construction had been going on for approximately two weeks, and it was occurring at night when the kitchen was not in use. Staff member E stated they had draped plastic sheeting for barriers, to keep the dust out of the rest of the kitchen.During an…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-05-19 · tag F0809 — failed to serve meals on a reasonable schedule — widespread
  Ensure meals and snacks are served at times in accordance with resident’s needs, preferences, and requests. Suitable and nourishing alternative meals and snacks must be provided for residents who want to eat at non-traditional times or outside of scheduled meal times.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide meals at the regular scheduled times for 5 (#s 23, 24, 36, 49 and 76) of 25 sampled residents. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents of the facility. Findings include: 1. During an observation and interview, on 5/17/25 at 1:01 p.m., resident #49 was lying in bed with no lunch tray. Resident #49 stated food was always late, especially the breakfast and lunch meals. Resident #49 stated he had not received his lunch yet. He stated lunch would often be delivered between 1:30 p.m. and 2:30 p.m. Resident #49 stated he would order food from local restaurants to be delivered if he was really hungry or did not like the food when he finally got it. During an observation on 5/17/25 at 1:10 p.m., eight residents were seated at tables in the C dining room, with drinks in front of them, but no food. Room trays had not been delivered on the unit yet to the residents in their rooms. During an observation on 5/17/25 at…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-05-19 · tag F0554 — pattern
  Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure residents were assessed and found safe to self-administer their own medications, prior to doing so; and the facility failed to document the assessments or a physician order in the EHRs, for 4 (#s 23, 45, 49, and 53) of 25 sampled residents. This deficient practice increased the risk of a negative outcome for the residents, in the event the medication and self/staff monitoring were not handled properly. Findings include: 1. During an observation and interview on 5/18/25 at 7:50 a.m., staff member G entered resident #45's room and placed a cup of pills on his bedside table. Staff member G then left the room without the resident taking the medications. The cup of pills contained loratadine (antihistamine), nifedipine Extended-Release (calcium channel blocker), and a Velphoro chew (treats hypocalcemia). Resident #45 stated he did not like to take his pills without food, and meals were often late, so the nurses routinely left the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-05-19 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to failed to correctly reflect the code status of a resident in the EHR for 1 (#68) of 25 sampled residents, and this failure increased the risk of the resident being resuscitated in a health crisis, when that was not the resident's preference or what was documented on the resident's POLST form. Findings include: During an interview on 5/19/25 at 7:59 a.m., staff member E stated social services assures the POLST is reviewed and accurately completed for the resident upon admission. Staff member E further stated the code status on the POLST form should be the same as the code status in the EHR. A review of resident #68's POLST form showed Section A, under the heading Treatment options the box for Do Not Attempt Resuscitation was checked. A review of resident #68's EHR showed his code status as Full Code/Full Treatment A review of a facility policy titled Residents' Rights Regarding Treatment and Advance Directives, with a copyright date of 2025, showed: Policy: It is the policy of this facility to support and facilitate a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-05-19 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — pattern
  Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure gradual dose reductions were attempted, unless the prescriber documented a rationale for the contraindication of the change, for 3 (#s 10, 19, and 54) of 25 sampled residents. Findings include: A review of the State Operations Manual, Appendix PP, under F605, showed: Adequate Indications for use refers to the identified, documented clinical rationale for administering a medication that is based upon an assessment of the resident's condition and therapeutic goals, and after any other treatments have been deemed clinically contraindicated. For psychotropic medications, without documentation in the record explaining that the practitioner has determined that other treatments have been deemed clinically contraindicated, the indication for use is inadequate. Also, adequate indication for use means that the medication administered is consistent with manufacturer's recommendations and/or clinical practice guidelines, clinical standards of practice,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-05-19 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to follow smoking assessment safety recommendations for residents who were smoking; failed to monitor the location were residents were smoking; failed to ensure the residents signed out of the facility when smoking (as needed); and failed to follow and adhere to the facility policy related to resident smoking. These failures occurred throughout the survey period, for multiple shifts and days, and multiple staff failed to adhere to the policy, for 3 (#s 40, 75, and 238) of 5 sampled residents who smoke. This deficient practice placed all residents entering the activities room at risk of exposure to second-hand smoke and risk for fire. This deficient practice placed residents at risk of injury while smoking, increased risk of fires, and accidents related to smoking. Findings include: 1. During an observation and interview on 5/18/25 at 2:15 p.m., resident #75 was sitting immediately outside the activity door smoking. Resident #75 stated staff member B stated he could smoke outside the door. Resident #75 stated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to SWEETWATER CARE — 8 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MT