Bartow Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Met the expected recovery: 36.8% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 57 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.50 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 80% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 55% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy at close to weekday levels right through the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 112.0 residents a day — about 93% occupied, or roughly 8 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.20 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.51 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.02 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.07 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.26 on weekdays — 6% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.54 to 0.43 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 50% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

17 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 7 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · F2024-07-30 · tag F0645 — widespread
  PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based in interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the accuracy of the Level I Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) for twenty-three (#2, #3, #21, #16, #66, #87, #96, #53, #7, #31, #48, #32, #74, #62, #89, #10, #11, #27, #102, #51, #4, #33, and #20) of twenty-three residents reviewed. Findings included: 1. Record review revealed Resident #89 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included schizoaffective disorder, bipolar type and major depressive disorder according to the admission Record. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], revealed: -Section I: Active Diagnosis - Depression and Schizophrenia -Section N: Medications administered - Antidepressant. Review of the Medication Administration Record (MAR) for July 2024 showed: -Duloxetine 30 milligrams (mg) - 1 capsules via G-Tube daily for depression -Trazodone 50mg via G-Tube daily for depression. Review of the PASRR Level I, dated 06/07/2023, revealed: -Section IA, Bipolar and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-07-30 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — pattern
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure oxygen therapy was administered as ordered for four residents (#50, #271, #170 and #114) of seven residents sampled. Findings included: 1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #50 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include chronic respiratory failure, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD, according to the admission Record. During an observation on 7/28/24 at 11:00 a.m., the resident's oxygen was observed to be set and administering at 2.5 liters per minute (LPM). (Photographic Evidence Obtained) During an interview with the resident at the time of the observation, the resident stated her oxygen should be at 3 liters all the time. The resident confirmed she had used oxygen for a long time. Review of the current physician's orders for Resident #50 showed: -Oxygen at 4 LPM (liters per minute) Via N/C (nasal cannula) continuously for COPD with humidification. dated 11/25/22. Review of the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-30 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure medication was stored properly in two (400 hall and 200 hall) out of two medication carts audited, one out of one medication rooms audited, for one resident (#62) out of 48 sampled residents and on three out of four hallways. Findings included: An observation was conducted on 7/27/24 at 9:29 a.m. of a medication cart unlocked on the 400 hall. The nurse was observed to be in a resident room and no other nurses were in the hall at the time. (Photographic Evidence Obtained) An observation was conducted on 7/27/24 at 9:38 a.m. of a medication cart on the 400 hall with a bag of IV (intravenous) medication (Ceftriaxone) sitting in the side compartment of the medication cart not locked up. There were no nurses in sight of the medication cart. (Photographic Evidence Obtained) An audit was completed on 7/28/24 at 9:10 a.m. of the 200 hall medication cart with Staff A, Registered Nurse (RN). The bottom drawer of the medication cart contained two weekly pill boxes with medication in each compartment. The boxes had no names or…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-07-30 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to maintain an effective infection control and prevention program to prevent the spread of infection by 1.) failing to ensure transmission based precautions were implemented in a timely manner for one resident (#323) of one resident under transmission based precautions in the facility, 2.) failed to obtain physician's orders for transmission based precautions upon admission for one resident (#323) of one resident under transmission based precautions in the facility, 3.) failed to ensure appropriate signage for transmission based precautions was displayed outside of resident rooms under transmission based precautions for one resident (#323) of one resident under transmission based precautions in the facility, 4.) failed to implement enhanced barrier precautions during wound care treatment for one resident (#96) of four residents sampled for wound care, and 5.) failed to ensure hand hygiene was performed during meal service by two dietary…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-07-30 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility did not ensure a safe, clean, and homelike environment in two resident rooms housing a total of four residents (Rm 311 and RM [ROOM NUMBER]) related to windows not being completely sealed shut and for two residents (#30 and #3) related to unclean equipment and broken equipment out of a sample of 48 residents. Findings included: 1. An observation made on 7/27/24 at 11:20 a.m. revealed the window in room [ROOM NUMBER] was floor height and not sealed shut with an approximate opening of a half inch. One of the two residents who resided in the room was in bed watching television. An observation made on 7/28/24 at 9:25 a.m. revealed the window in room [ROOM NUMBER] was floor height and not sealed shut with an approximate opening of half an inch. The resident in the B bed was observed sleeping in a low bed next to the window. An observation on 7/28/24 at 10:02 a.m. revealed the window in room [ROOM NUMBER] was not sealed shut with an approximate opening of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-07-30 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to accurately document and promptly resolve a grievance for one resident (#66) out of three sampled residents. Findings included: During an interview on 7/27/24 at 12:03 p.m. Resident #66 stated the night staff saw his [name brand] ear buds and a couple of other items and they were all stolen before noon. He stated he did a grievance and sent the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) two receipts two months ago and has follow up emails and a text message and nothing has been done. He stated the other items he replaced himself, but the only reason he didn't replace the ear buds was because he used a $100 credit plus $69 to purchase them. He tried to explain this to the NHA and provided the receipts. A review of the Grievance Logs from January 2024 to July 2024 revealed no grievances related to the missing property for Resident #66. An interview was conducted with Staff M, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) on 7/28/24 at 3:51 p.m. She stated a couple…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-30 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review facility failed to develop and implement care plans for two residents (#90 and #18) out of forty eight sampled residents. Findings included: 1. Review of a progress note for Resident #90, dated 7/3/24, showed Notified by CNA [Certified nursing assistant] staff that resident lying on the floor between bed and bedside table. Assess the resident no signs of pain or distress noted and no injury, used [mechanical]lift, MD [Medical doctor] notify, and the family notify. Review of a progress note, dated 7/5/24 showed the resident had a fall from bed during care. Review of the admission Record showed Resident #90 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including tracheostomy status, morbid obesity, reduced mobility, lack of coordination, muscle wasting and atrophy, and unspecified sequelae of other cerebrovascular disease. Review of Resident #90's Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], Section GG, Functional Abilities and Goals showed resident has upper and lower…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-07-30 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure care for an indwelling catheter was provided in accordance with professional standards of practice for one (#87) of one resident sampled for urinary catheters. Findings included: A review of Resident #87's medical record revealed Resident #87 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. A review of Resident #87's physician orders revealed an order dated 7/9/2024 for urinary catheter care daily and as needed. Resident #87's physician orders also revealed an order dated 7/25/2024 for metronidazole 500 milligrams (mg) by mouth two times a day for 7 days due to vaginal discharge. An observation was conducted on 7/27/2024 at 10:45 AM in Resident #87's room. Resident #87 was observed resting in bed with a urinary catheter bag hanging from the right side of the bed. The urinary catheter bag was observed resting on the floor while hanging from the bed. The urine observed in Resident #87's catheter tubing appeared cloudy, thick, and with a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-07-30 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — isolated
  Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) practice that demonstrated identification, monitoring and implementation of an effective action plan to correct citations related to ensuring care for an indwelling catheter was provided in accordance with professional standards of practice for two (#7 and #8) of two residents sampled for urinary catheters (F690) during the revisit survey conducted on 9/9/2024. Findings included: A review of Resident #7's medical record revealed Resident #7 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. A review of Resident #7's physician orders revealed an order dated 7/30/2024 for urinary catheter care daily and as needed. An observation of catheter care for Resident #7 was conducted on 9/9/2024 at 1:54 PM with Staff A, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) with the facility's Director of Nursing (DON) observing the procedure. Staff A, CNA conducted hand hygiene and donned an isolation gown and gloves…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2022-04-08 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interviews the facility failed to ensure treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice related to not ensuring a Hospital Transfer Evaluation form accurately assessed the condition of one resident (#36) and failed to ensure the resident's (#36) blood glucose levels were documented as ordered out of thirty-five sampled residents. Findings included: A review of the admission Record revealed Resident #36 was admitted on [DATE]. The admission Record included diagnoses of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus with diabetic chronic kidney disease, unspecified chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, unspecified atrial fibrillation, and unspecified heart failure. A record review identified a Hospital Transfer Evaluation Summary, dated 4/5/22 at 9:13 a.m., that indicated the resident was transferred to an acute facility for altered mental status on 4/5/22. The Key Clinical Information showed the following vital signs: - Most recent Glucose: 164 taken on 4/4/222 at 5:06 a.m. -…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$8,034 in federal fines across 2 penalties.

• $4,017 — penalty dated 2024-07-30
• $4,017 — penalty dated 2024-07-30

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to HEARTHSTONE SENIOR COMMUNITIES — 8 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 21 rows in the source record cover these 14 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

8 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 80% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $219K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in FL