Boca Ciega Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

26.3% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 37 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 57.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 68 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.42 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 72% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 19% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 105.2 residents a day — about 88% occupied, or roughly 15 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.17 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.67 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.00 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.97 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.25 on weekdays — 9% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.76 to 0.45 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 52% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are unchanged from the previous inspection. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

30 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 19 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2026-03-25 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision to prevent resident to resident altercation for two (#5 & #6) of thirteen sampled residents. Findings included: A review of Resident #6's admission record showed an admission in 02/2020. The diagnosis information included: chronic pain syndrome; neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder; muscle wasting and atrophy not elsewhere classified; idiopathic progressive neuropathy; generalized anxiety disorder; bipolar disorder; type 2 diabetes; atherosclerotic heart disease of native coronary artery without angina pectoris; . A review of Resident #6's BIMS, dated 02/03/2026, documented a score of 14, which indicated cognitively intact. A review of Resident #5's admission record showed an admission of 01/05/2026. The diagnosis included: cerebral infarction; dysarthria following cerebral infarction; encephalopathy; difficulty in walking; unspecified dementia without behavioral disturbance; psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance and anxiety; cognitive communication deficit; . A review of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-08 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation, and record review, the facility did not ensure timely Activities of Daily Living (ADL) related to incontinence care for two (#1 and #2) of three residents. Findings include: On 8/08/2024 at 10:30 a.m., an interview and observation were conducted with Resident #2 in his room. Resident #2 was in his bed and when asked when was the last time his incontinence needs were addressed, he stated last night and agreed no one had come in this morning to change him. Resident #2 agreed he needed incontinence care now. On 8/08/2024 at 11:00 a.m., an interview and observation were conducted with Resident #1 in her room. She stated the last time she had her incontinence care addressed was 3:30 a.m. and currently was waiting for her morning needs to be met. Resident #1 agreed she was wet and in need of incontinence care stating, they will get around to it eventually, they are so busy. Resident #1 agreed she felt uncomfortable in her briefs but stated, there is nothing I can do about it. On…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2024-05-02 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews and policy review the facility failed to ensure a clean and sanitary kitchen on three of three observations regarding areas that were not clean or were in disrepair. Finding included During an observation on 4/29/2024 at 11:00 a.m. showed on an initial tour in the kitchen a dirty trash can next to the hand washing station. Food trays were observed piled up on kitchen sink, next to the hand washing station during meal preparation. Dirt and food particles were observed on the walk-in refrigerator floor. During a follow-up kitchen visit on 04/31/2024 at 11:00 a.m., showed the kitchen stove dirty with grease stuck on the side of the stove and missing stove knobs covers. An open garbage can was observed next to cooked food on the stove. The kitchen floor was observed dirty multiple times throughout the survey. During an interview on 5/3/2024 at 2:00 p.m., with the Certified Dietary Manager, CDM. She stated that there are areas in the kitchen that need to be cleaned up. She has tried to clean the walk-in refrigerator floor, but it is very hard to clean…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-05-02 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a safe, clean, and homelike environment for resident rooms and bathrooms, during four days (4/29, 4/30, 5/01, and 5/02/24) of four days observed, in three of four hallways observed. Findings included: 1) On 4/29/2024 at 9:53 AM the nightstand of the occupied room [ROOM NUMBER] B was observed to have three drawers. The front of the middle drawer was not attached to the base on the right side, leaving the drawer lopsided and resting on the bottom drawer. (Photographic Evidence Obtained). On 4/29/2024 at 10:00 AM the door to the bathroom in the occupied room [ROOM NUMBER] was observed with a cylindrical metal piece protruding from where the doorknob should be. No doorknob was found. (Photographic Evidence Obtained). On 4/29/2024 at 10:08 AM the wall behind the occupied bed of 415 A was observed with a deep gouge in the drywall, leaving a hole in the wall behind the bed. The head of the bed was resting on the wall and floor, not…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-02 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews, the facility 1) failed to revise and review one resident (#60) care plan with the appropriate staff/professionals and resident out of forty-one sampled residents, 2) failed to review and revise the care plan for four residents (#55, #1, #47, and #85) related to psychotropic medications, falls, activities of daily living (ADL), and range of motion (ROM) out of forty-one sampled residents. Findings included: 1. Review of Resident #60's admission Record revealed the resident was initially admitted on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE]. The record included diagnoses not limited to Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, unspecified peripheral vascular disease, and unspecified sequelae of cerebral infarction. During an interview on 4/30/24 at 9:46 a.m., Resident #60 reported no participation in care planning meetings and stated, They're supposed to do all that?, then began chuckling and clapping hands. Review of Resident #60's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE],…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-02 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — pattern
  Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observations and interviews the facility failed to provide restorative therapy related to applying splints for Resident #30 and did not prevent the further decrease in range of motion for Resident #85 out of twelve residents. Findings included: On 04/29/24 at 10:25 a.m., an observation was made of Resident #30 in his room with his eyes closed. Resident #30 had a blanket covering his body from chest to feet with his arms on top of the blanket. Resident #30's hands were in a curled loose fist bilaterally on top of his chest. Record review of Resident #30's admission Record had an original admission date of 6/30/2018 with a readmission date of 04/15/2024. Resident #30 has a primary diagnosis of Multiple Sclerosis (MS) with secondary diagnoses to include but not limited to aphasia and dysphagia following nontraumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage, major depression, and contracture of muscle multiple sites. A record review of Resident #30 physician orders shows orders for Physical/Occupational and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-05-02 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review the facility failed to ensure medication was administered in a clean manner, ensure staff doffed PPE (personal protective equipment) appropriately, and residents were offered hand hygiene prior to meals. Findings included: On 4/30/24 at 11:00 a.m., an observation was made of the main dining area prior to lunch service of residents self-propelling with their arms to dining tables. Staff were present waiting for lunch tray delivery and/or bringing residents to the dining area. Residents were not offered hand hygiene prior to the delivery of lunch. The Activities Director was witnessed washing a resident's hands with a wet paper towel and then sitting next to this resident to assist with feeding. On 5/01/23 at 1:38 p.m., an observation was made during incontinence care of two Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs) and a resident on Enhanced Precaution Isolation. Both CNAs were wearing appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE) during the care provided to the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-05-02 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
  Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to accommodate the needs for one resident (#85) related to placing the call light within the resident's reach out of six residents sampled for environmental concerns. Findings included: On 4/29/2024 at 9:58 AM Resident #85 was observed in the bed, facing the ceiling, arms crossed at the waist. The call light was around the bed rail on the left side near the head of the bed. Resident #85 was on an air mattress with a perimeter cover, in front of the bed rail. Resident #85 was not able to reach the call light when requested. An interview was conducted with Staff S, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) on 4/29/2024 at 10:00 AM. Staff S, LPN confirmed Resident #85 uses the call light and call lights should be within the resident's reach. Staff S, LPN confirmed Resident #85's call light was not within reach. Staff S, LPN assisted resident and placed the call light within the resident's reach. On 4/29/2024 at 3:15 PM Resident #85 was observed in the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-02 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure two dependent residents (#81 and #13), were provided with Activity of Daily Living(ADL) assistance related to hair and fingernail care out of forty one sampled residents. Finding Included: 1. During an observation on 04/29/2024 at 11:00 a.m., Resident # 81 was observed laying down in bed dressed in his nightgown with his call light within reach. Resident # 81 fingernails were observed long and dirty and he had thick facial hair. Resident # 81 stated he has asked staff to cut his hair and his fingernails, but they will not assist him. During an observation on 04/30 /24 at 02:24 PM Resident #81 was observed laying down in bed with his call light in reach, dressed in his nightgown. Resident # 81 said he has asked his aide to cut his facial hair and his fingernail, but she did not assist him with his care. Review of an admission Record, dated 05/02/2024, showed Resident #81 was admitted initially on 06/17/2023 and readmitted on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-02 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
  Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews the failed to ensure two residents (# 68, 13) residing on the same hall were provided with activities out of eight residents sampled. Finding Include: 1.During an observation made on 04/29/2024 at 10:00 a.m., 11:30 a.m., and again at 3:00p.m., Resident# 68 was observed in bed, leaning off the side of her bed. Resident # 68 was dressed in her nightgown, with her call light out of her reach. During an observation made on 04/30/24 at 9:00 a.m. and 11:30 a.m., Resident # 68 was observed in bed, dressed in a nightgown with her call light out of reach. Resident # 68 was observed leaning to the side. Review of an admission Record dated 05/02/2024 showed Resident # 68 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses to include but not limited to Unspecified Dementia, Unspecified Severity, without Behavioral Disturbance, Psychotic Disturbance, Mood Disturbance, and Anxiety, Cognitive Communication Deficit, Need for assistance with Personal Care Review of a Minimum Data Set, MDS…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-02 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews the facility failed to assess and obtain physician orders for the wounds of two (#60 and #45) out of three residents sampled for skin conditions. Findings included: 1. On 4/30/24 at 9:51 a.m., Resident #60 was observed lying in bed and a tan-colored foam dressing was observed covering the left below the knee amputation (LBKA), the dressing was dated 4/28 11-7 and initialed, EC, with a pencil eraser-sized discoloration. Photographic evidence was obtained. On 5/1/24 at 2:22 p.m., Resident #60 was observed sitting in wheelchair and stated the dressing (to LBKA) had not been changed. The resident reported yesterday's nurse stated the 11 p.m. - 7 a.m. (11-7) shift nurse was going to change it. The dressing was observed and continued to be dated 4/28 11-7 EC with a pencil eraser-sized discoloration. Photographic evidence was obtained. Review of Resident #60's evaluations did not show a Change of Condition or Wound evaluation had been completed on 4/28 in regards to the skin condition covered by the dressing covering the LBKA. Review of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$13,520 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $13,520 — penalty dated 2026-03-25

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to HEARTHSTONE SENIOR COMMUNITIES — 8 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 21 rows in the source record cover these 14 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

8 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 83% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $210K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in FL