Indigo Manor

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

49.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 117 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 42.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 89 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.41 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 71% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 35% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 173 beds and averages 124.6 residents a day — about 72% occupied, or roughly 48 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.29 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.72 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.86 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.08 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.37 on weekdays — 9% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.76 to 0.63 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 61% is well above the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

28 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 17 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · J2023-04-13 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, a review of resident records and facility policies, and interviews with staff, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from neglect, by failing to provide supervision and interventions to maintain safety, prevent elopement (leaving the premises without supervision or permission) and minimize the risk of injury or death for one (Resident #92) of three residents reviewed for elopement risk, from a total of 52 residents in the sample. The facility's neglect to provide appropriate services and interventions to prevent elopement after identifying the resident as at risk, permitted Resident #92 to exit the facility and wander to a busy intersection without staff supervision, placing him at risk for serious bodily harm or death. On 2/27/23, Resident #92 was admitted to the facility's first floor. The same day, at 2:15 p.m., he was assessed as an elopement risk and a Wanderguard (alarm bracelet) was to have been applied. On 2/28/23 at 6:29 a.m., the resident was noted as wandering the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-02-17 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on kitchen food service observations, staff interviews, facility document review, and facility policy and procedure review, the facility failed to follow proper sanitation and food handling practices to prevent the outbreak of foodborne illness, with the potential to affect all residents who consumed foods from the facility, by failing to maintain sanitary conditions in the cooking area, with significant accumulation of grease buildup, food debris and residue, and heavy soilage on both floor surfaces and equipment. Food handling and sanitation are important in health care settings serving nursing home residents. Unsafe food handling practices represent a potential source of pathogen exposure.The findings include:A tour of the kitchen was conducted on 2/17/26 at 10:15 am. During the tour the following unsanitary conditions were observed: food residue on equipment and cookware, grease buildup, accumulated debris, and grime on the kitchen floor in and around the cooking area. (Photographic evidence obtained)A follow-up tour of the kitchen was conducted on 2/17/26 at 3:27 pm. The…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-17 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, record review, and policy and procedure review, the facility failed to provide fingernail care for one (Resident #3) of five residents reviewed for Activities of Daily Living (ADLs), from a total survey sample of 7 residents. The finding include:On 02/17/26 at 10:49 AM, Resident #3 was observed sitting in a wheelchair adjacent to the south unit nurse's station. Several of the resident's fingernails of both hands were observed as jagged and extended approximately 1/2 inch beyond the nail bed. When the resident was asked about his nails, he stated he did not like his nails so long but could not remember if he asked the facility staff to trim his fingernails. (Photographic evidence obtained)A review of Resident #3's medical record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), unspecified, type II diabetes mellitus without complications, pseudobulbar affect, chronic kidney disease, stage 2 (mild), and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-17 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolated
  Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure one (Resident #7) of five sampled residents' room were maintained in a safe, functional, sanitary, and comfortable environment by leaving disposable razors unattended on the resident's bedside table. The findings include:On 02/17/26 at 11:13 AM, two unused disposable razors were observed on Resident #7's bedside table. When asked about the razors, the resident reported that a certified nursing assistant (CNA) brought the razors into his room and abruptly left before providing shaving assistance. He couldn't remember the name of the CNA or whether the incident occurred during the daytime or nighttime shift.A review of Resident #7's medical record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including muscle wasting and atrophy, muscle weakness, type II diabetes, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), peripheral vascular disease, unspecified, chronic systolic (congestive) heart…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-03-13 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on kitchen food service observations, staff interviews, record review, and facility policy and procedure review, the facility failed to follow proper sanitation and food handling practices to prevent the outbreak of foodborne illness, with the potential to affect all residents who consumed foods from the facility's kitchen, by failing to log proper temperatures for the dish machine and chemical sanitization for the 3-compartment sink, and clean food buildup stuck on the back handle and under the safety guard of the mixer. Food handling and sanitation is important in health care settings serving nursing home residents. Unsafe food handling practices represent a potential source of pathogen exposure. The findings include: A tour of the kitchen was conducted on 03/10/25 at 11:07 AM. During the tour, a review of the dish machine temperature logs for January, February, and March 2025, revealed a wash temperature of 140 degrees Fahrenheit (F) and a rinse temperature of 145 degrees F, consistently. Further, a review of the 3-compartment sink, Pot/Pan temperature logs for January…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-13 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to provide toenail care for one (Resident #33) of four residents reviewed for Activities of Daily Living (ADLs), from a total survey sample of 41 residents. Resident #33's toenails extended approximately one half inch beyond the nailbed and were jagged. The findings include: An observation made on 03/10/25 at 1:43 PM, revealed that Resident #33's toenails extended approximately one half inch beyond the nail bed and were jagged on both feet. (Photographic evidence obtained) An interview was attempted with the resident, but he did not respond. On 03/11/25 at 10:44 AM, Resident #33's toenails were observed and were in the same condition as the previous day's ovservation. They extended approximately one half inch beyond the nail bed and were jagged on both feet. (Photographic evidence obtained) An interview was again attempted with the resident, but he did not respond. During an interview with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) B on 03/13/25 at 11:37 AM, she reported that she had been employed by the facility since…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-13 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the resident environment remained as free of accident hazards as was possible; and that each resident received adequate supervision to prevent accidents for one (Resident #7) of three residents reviewed for accidents, from a total survey sample of 41 residents. Resident #7 was discovered keeping smoking materials on self. The findings include: On 03/10/25 at 9:55 AM, an observation was made of Resident #7 holding a cigarette lighter while seated in his wheelchair on the elevator going to the first floor. On 03/13/25 at 10:29 AM, Resident #7 was observed in his room and was interviewed. He reported that he was a smoker and smoked during the 8:00 AM, 10:00 AM, 1:00 PM and 3:00 PM smoking breaks. He further reported that he kept his cigarette lighter in the dresser next to his bed. He became agitated and yelled that the facility could just take his lighter and take it all away. During an interview with the Assistant Director of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-13 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, record review, and policy and procedure review, the facility failed to ensure ensure that one (Resident #137) of 39 residents receiving respiratory care, was provided such care, consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' goals and preferences. Resident #137 was not receiving oxygen at the ordered flow rate. The findings include: On 03/10/25 at 1:51 PM, Resident #137 was observed lying in bed receiving oxygen via nasal cannula (NC). The oxygen concentrator located next to the head of her bed had a flow rate setting of 3.25-3.50 Liters per minute (L/min). (Photographic evidence obtained) On 03/13/25 at 12:50 PM, while checking the resident's oxygen flow rate, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) K verified that Resident #137's oxygen flow rate setting was currently set at 4 L/min, but the oxygen order was for a flow rate of 2 L/min. She stated nurses provided ongoing monitoring of the resident's oxygen therapy. Nursing was responsible for ensuring that the resident was receiving the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-13 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
  Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interviews, medical record review, and facility policy and procedure review, the facility failed to ensure that its medication error rate was not 5% or greater. Two medication errors out of 25 opportunities for error, resulted in an error rate of 8 % and involved Residents #45 and #113. The findings include: On 03/12/25 at 12:44 PM, Registered Nurse (RN) L was observed preparing Oxycodone-Acetaminophen 10/325 mg (milligrams), 1 tablet by mouth every 6 hours routinely for Resident #45 in room [ROOM NUMBER]-2. RN L was then accompanied into room [ROOM NUMBER]-1 where Resident #77 was lying in bed. RN L greeted the resident and explained that she was going to administer pain medication the resident had requested. The nurse asked Resident #77 what her pain level was and at that point, was asked to hold the medication and step outside of the resident's room. RN L was asked if she had chosen the right patient, medication, dose, time, and frequency. RN L was accompanied back to the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-10-03 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — widespread
  Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to maintain the kitchen in a safe and sanitary manner due to a ceiling area having a plastic sheet covering an opening that was dripping liquid where food is prepared, and by failing to maintain missing ceiling tiles in the dish room. The findings include: During a visit to the kitchen on 10/02/23 at 12:06 pm, the ceiling was observed with three plastic bags covering an opening. One of the areas was covered by a bag near the tray line taped with black and red duck tap. A brown liquid was observed dropping water on the floor. Water was also observed on the floor at the tray line where the carts were parked. In the dish room there were missing tiles in the ceiling. (Photographic evidence obtained) During an interview with the certified dietary manager (CDM) on 10/02/23 at 12:15 pm, she confirmed there was liquid dripping close to the tray line and there were missing tile pieces in the dish room. When asked what the status was to repair these areas, she stated the maintenance manager would have more…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2023-10-03 · tag F0569 — pattern
  Notify each resident of certain balances and convey resident funds upon discharge, eviction, or death.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to convey within 30 days upon discharge the resident's funds, and a final accounting of those funds for 2 (Residents #2 and #7) of 4 residents reviewed for personal funds; and failed to notify the resident or the resident's representative when the amount in the residents account reached $200 less than the eligibility limit for 1 (Resident #6) of 4 residents reviewed, from a total sample of 8 residents. The findings include: 1. A closed record review for Resident #2 revealed that she was admitted on [DATE] and discharged on 1/21/23. A review of the discharge return not anticipated minimum data set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed that Resident #2 had a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) score of 3 out of 15, indicating severe cognitive impairment. Resident had a planned discharge to hospice and her daughter was listed as the power of attorney (POA). During a phone interview with Resident #2's POA on 10/2/23 at. 1:30…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$22,530 in federal fines across 3 penalties.

• $6,380 — penalty dated 2025-03-13
• $6,380 — penalty dated 2025-03-13
• $9,770 — penalty dated 2025-03-13

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to BEDROCK HEALTHCARE — 9 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 23 rows in the source record cover these 13 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

8 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $880K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in FL