No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Abbotsford Health Care Center

600 E Elm St, Abbotsford, WI 54405 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 78 certified beds · (715) 223-2359 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (715) 223-2359 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citations — no harm found (F0605, F0607, F0610) — most recent Jun 20261 immediate-jeopardy citation CMS recorded as corrected before the inspection ended (past non-compliance)$15,939 in federal fines
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

Worth asking about
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605, F0607, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (45) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $15,939 in federal fines (most recent 2024-07-22)
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 3 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
8 Johnson Street
Pharmacy
206 N 4th St · (715) 721-6068 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
116 N 1st St · (715) 223-2069 · Call to confirm hours
Park
S 5th St · Typically dawn to dusk

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 3 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 2 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 3 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased14.3%16.1%15.4%typical
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight5.8%5.1%5.4%typical
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder4.4%2.1%0.9%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.8%2.7%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms3.3%5.7%6.5%better
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury0.0%3.3%3.3%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened25.1%18.4%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication20.7%16.9%18.9%typical
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine83.7%95.0%95.3%worse
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers8.0%5.0%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control30.7%24.6%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table26.2%15.8%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication2.1%1.2%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine27.9%82.2%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission19.9%23.1%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit7.5%15.5%12.0%better

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

35.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 73 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

35.0%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.3%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
not reportedno hours filed
Therapy hours / resident / day

Therapy staffing: not reported. This home filed no therapist hours at all in its payroll data for this quarter. That is a gap in what it reported, and we do not read it as an absence of therapy — the homes that file nothing here include ones that discharged hundreds of Medicare rehab patients in the very same period, who plainly received therapy from someone. Because we cannot tell a home that under-reports from one that genuinely provides little, this home is left out of the comparison above rather than scored at zero. Ask it directly how many therapist hours a rehab resident gets, and on which days.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF35.0%CMS range 23.8–49.851.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024worse than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.3%CMS range 7.6–15.310.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization6.3%CMS range 3.6–11.27.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.171.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.84
RN hours/ resident / day
0.45
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.87
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.16
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.73
RN hoursweekends
44.4%
Total nursing turnover
25.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 78 beds and averages 42.3 residents a day — about 54% occupied, or roughly 36 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.16 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.84 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.87 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.72 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.33 on weekdays — 18% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.89 to 0.73 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 44% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

16
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-06-02)
8
at the previous standard inspection (2025-04-03)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

45 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 34 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-07-22 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident utilizing a Hoyer lift for transfers received adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents for 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed. Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) transferred R1 utilizing a Hoyer lift from the bed to the chair without assistance from another staff member. Facility policy states all mechanical lift transfers require 2 people. R1 slipped out of the Hoyer lift sling, fell to the floor, and struck R1's head sustaining a subarachnoid hemorrhage, subdural hematoma, a right posterior scalp laceration and hematoma, and required hospitalization. R1's condition declined as a result. R1 was verbal, but nonsensical prior to the fall, and is now nonverbal. R1's code status changed from Full Code to Do Not Resuscitate (DNR). R1 is now residing in a hospice facility. The facility's failure to follow the policy for 2 staff assistance for Hoyer lift transfers created a finding of immediate jeopardy that began on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · Ddisputed · IDR2026-06-29 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure residents received services in the facility with reasonable accommodation of needs for 2 of 3 residents (R1, R5) reviewed from a sample of 5 residents.-R1 did not have a wheelchair available at all times and did not have the ability to get out of bed during those times.-R1 did not have assistance in obtaining eyeglasses replaced or fixed causing skin injuries.-R5 was unable to get out of bed at times due to the Hoyer lift not working properly.Findings include:The facility policy titled, Resident Rights Policy, dated 01/05/26, reads in part: The resident has a right to be treated with respect and dignity, including.the right to reside and receive services in the facility with reasonable accommodation of resident needs and preferences.Example 1R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including hemiplegia and hemiparesis following a stroke affecting the right dominant side, and history of heart attack. On 06/02/26, R1's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited beforedisputed · IDR2026-06-29 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not revise a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with the resident rights, for 1 of 3 residents reviewed from a sample of 5 residents (R1).-R1's care plan did not include the use of a Broda chair or interventions related to sharing a Broda chair with another resident.Findings include:The facility policy titled, Comprehensive Care Plans, dated 10/01/22, reads in part: The comprehensive care plan will describe, at a minimum, the following: the services that are to be furnished to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being .resident specific interventions that reflect the resident's needs and preferences.On 06/29/26, Surveyor reviewed R1's medical record. R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with R1's personal motorized wheelchair. On 02/15/26, R1 was noted to be unsafe and was recommended to be placed in a Broda wheelchair for safety and positioning. R1's care plan…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-06-02 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections, which has the potential to affect all 39 residents.-The facility's infection control surveillance was incomplete and missing pertinent information to help prevent the spread of infection.-A wet/soiled incontinence brief was observed on the nightstand of a resident's room (R32).Findings include:The facility policy titled, Infection Prevention and Control Program, last revised 07/2025 includes: A system of surveillance is utilized for prevention, identifying, reporting, investigating, and controlling infections and communicable diseases for all residents, staff, volunteers, visitors, and other individuals providing services under a contractual arrangement based upon a facility assessment and accepted national standards.Example 1On 05/31/26 at 9:08 AM, Surveyor observed a heavily saturated incontinence…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2026-06-02 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — widespread
    Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure the Infection Prevention and Control Program included an Antibiotic Stewardship Program monitoring antibiotic use which has the potential to affect all 39 residents.-The facility does not currently have an antibiotic stewardship program in place.Findings include:The facility policy titled, Antibiotic Stewardship Program, last revised November 2017, includes: It is the policy of this facility to implement an Antibiotic Stewardship Program as part of the facility's overall infection prevention and control program. The purpose of the program is to optimize the treatment of infection while reducing the adverse events associated with antibiotic use.The program includes antibiotic use protocols and a system to monitor antibiotic use.On 06/02/26 at 9:43 AM, Surveyor interviewed Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) C about the antibiotic stewardship part of the infection control program. LPN C stated the previous Infection Preventionist (IP) did not leave the information for the facility or did not complete the documentation for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2026-06-02 · tag F0882 — widespread
    Designate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure the facility designated one or more individuals as the Infection Preventionist, who has completed specialized training in infection prevention and control. This has the potential to affect all 39 residents.-The facility does not have a certified infection preventionist. Findings include:The facility policy titled, Infection Prevention and Control Program, last revised 07/2025 includes: The designated Infection Preventionist is responsible for oversight of the program and serves as a consultant to our staff on infectious diseases, resident room placement, implementing isolation precautions, staff and resident exposures, surveillance, and epidemiological investigations of exposures of infectious disease.On 05/31/26 at 11:23 AM, Surveyor interviewed Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) A about who oversees the infection control program. NHA A indicated the previous Infection Preventionist (IP) had terminated employment recently and that Director of Nursing (DON) B and Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) C would be working on the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-06-02 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not immediately report to the physician on call of R22's decline of a groin wound for 1 of 2 residents (R) reviewed for pressure injuries (R22).R22's groin pressure injury (PI) increased in size on 05/30/26, and the facility did not notify the physician of the change. This is evidenced by:R22 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R22's current diagnoses include progressive multiple sclerosis, spinal stenosis of the lumbar region, and venous insufficiency (chronic peripheral). On 04/16/26, Minimum Data Set (MDS) documented R22 was independent with cognitive skills for daily decision making. R22 had impairment on both sides of lower extremities. R22 is dependent on staff assistance for toileting hygiene, lower body dressing and transfers. R22 requires maximum assistance of staff for personal hygiene and bed mobility. On 05/23/26, facility's assessment of R22's left groin wound was documented as a stage 3 PI measuring 0.1cm x 0.5cm x 0.1 cm. On 05/29/26, a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-06-02 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
    Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident's medication regimen was free from medications used in excessive duration and without adequate indications for use for 1 of 5 sampled residents (R) reviewed for unnecessary medications (R5). R5 is a resident with dementia who has a physician's order for an antipsychotic medication. R5 has been on the same dose of the medication for over a year and has not had any behaviors for the past three months. This medication has not been reviewed by a physician for possible reduction in the past 9 months. This is evidenced by:The facility's policy titled Psychotropic Medication Use dated revised February 2026 states, Psychotropic medication management is an interdisciplinary process that involves the resident, family and/or the representative and includes a. determining adequate indications for use; .d. determining appropriateness for gradual dose reduction.R5 was admitted to the facility in 2024 with diagnoses including dementia, muscle wasting, diabetes, cognitive impairment, traumatic brain injury, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-06-02 · tag F0637 — isolated
    Assess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview and record review, the facility did not ensure a Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment was completed for 1 resident (R) (R6) of 17 sampled residents.The facility did not complete a Comprehensive Significant Change MDS assessment when R6 revoked Hospice services. This is evidenced by:The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) User's Manual (October 2025) indicates: If a nursing home resident elects the hospice benefit, the nursing home is required to complete an MDS Significant Change in Status Assessment (SCSA). The nursing home is required to complete an SCSA when the resident comes off the hospice benefit (revoke). An SCSA is required to be performed when a resident is receiving hospice services and then decides to discontinue those services (known as revoking of hospice care). The ARD must be within 14 days from one of the following: 1) the effective date of the hospice election revocation (which can be the same or later than the date of the hospice election revocation…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-06-02 · tag F0638 — isolated
    Assure that each resident’s assessment is updated at least once every 3 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not assess a resident using the quarterly review instrument specified by the State and approved by Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) not less frequently than once every 3 months for 1 of 17 residents (R7).-R7's Quarterly MDS assessment was completed 40 days late and not submitted to CMS until survey was in process.Findings include:The facility policy titled, Resident Assessments, last revised October 2025, states the resident assessment coordinator (RAC) is responsible for ensuring the interdisciplinary team conducts timely and appropriate resident assessments.R7 was admitted to the facility on [DATE].R7's Minimum Dat Set (MDS) assessments indicated an assessment with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 04/19/26 was completed and locked on 05/24/26 but had not been submitted.On 06/02/26 at 12:38 PM, Surveyor interviewed Regional Minimum Data Set (RMDS) Coordinator H about quarterly and comprehensive assessments. RMDS H stated that about…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-06-02 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not complete an accurate assessment on residents (R) Minimum Data Set (MDS) that reflects the resident's status for 1 of 17 residents reviewed. (R25) -R25 had an admission MDS dated [DATE]. The facility coded the MDS, in section A, indicating R25 does not meet the federal definition of a serious mental illness and the PASARR I, diagnoses, and medications indicate otherwise.Findings include: Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) program identified R25 had no PASARR II completed for a serious mental health disorder for R25. According to federal definition and the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorder, 3rd edition, revised in 1987, states major mental disorders includes mood disorder, paranoid disorders, severe anxiety disorders, and personality disorders, other psychotic disorders, or other mental disorders that may lead to a chronic disability. R25 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including depression, anxiety,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 34 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2026-06-02 · tag F0645 — isolated
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure a level II PASARR was completed for a resident (R) with a mental health disorder, within 40 calendar days of admission for 1 of 3 residents reviewed. (R25) -R25 was admitted with mental health diagnoses on 02/06/26 and no level II PASARR screen was completed.Findings include:Per regulation S483.20(k)(1)-(3), a level II PASARR is a comprehensive evaluation conducted by a state-designated authority that determines whether an individual has mental disorder (MD), determines the appropriate setting for the individual, and recommends what, if any, specialized services and/or rehabilitative services the individual needs. Under 42 CFR 483.106(b)(2)(ii), If an individual who enters a nursing facility as an exception is later found to require more than 30 days of nursing facility care, the State mental health authority must conduct a Level II resident review within 40 calendar days of admission. R25 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-02 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not develop or implement a person-centered dialysis care plan to ensure the highest practicable physical well-being for 1 of 1 resident (R) reviewed for dialysis. (R42) -R42 receives dialysis. R42's care plan did not identify the dialysis company, provider, nephrologist, or contact number, days or times R42 attends dialysis, type (fistula/graft/catheter) of dialysis access used, identify which arm not to obtain BP, blood draws or administer IV. Findings include: R42 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include end stage renal disease. The facility conducted a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) assessment on 05/05/2026 that indicated a score of 14/15 meaning R42 had intact cognition. Surveyor reviewed R42's dialysis care plan dated 05/04/2026, that states, Alteration in Kidney Function Due to End Stage Renal Disease (SDRD), evidenced by hemodialysis. Interventions include check access site daily fistula/graft/catheter…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-02 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility did not review/revise the resident's person-centered comprehensive care plan for 1 resident (R6) of 17 resident's care plans reviewed. The facility did not update/revise R6's care plan after R6 revoked hospice services. The care plan was not revised to reflect R6's current goals and interventions according to R6's needs. This is evidenced by:Record review of R6's medical record documented an admission date of 05/23/25. R6's current diagnoses include orthopedic prosthetic devices, acute kidney failure, type 2 diabetes mellitus, depression, anxiety, and mood affective disorder.On 04/09/26, the Minimum Data Set (MDS) significant change assessment documented R6's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15/15 meaning intact cognition. Hospice care was elected. On 04/09/26, R6 signed a hospice election form.On 04/22/26, R6 signed a hospice revocation form to be effective on 04/22/26 with the reason for revoking the hospice benefit was hospice philosophy.Surveyor reviewed R6's current care plans. On 04/10/26, R6's care plan was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-02 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure that residents receive treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' choices for 1 of 4 residents (R32) reviewed for non-pressure skin injuries.-R32 has moisture-associated skin damage (MASD) to buttocks and weekly skin assessments do not reflect monitoring.-Weekly wound rounds indicate only one evaluation completed since wound provider last evaluated in March 2026 that indicated the wound had worsened. Findings include:The facility policy titled, Wound Care, last revised April 2026, includes The purpose of this procedure is to provide guidelines for the care of wounds to promote healing.assess and measure the wound.clean the wound.document the type of wound care given, the date and time wound care was given, and change in the resident's condition.report other information in accordance with facility policy and professional standards of practice.Surveyor…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-06-02 · tag F0685 — isolated
    Assist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure residents receive proper treatment and assistive devices to maintain vision and hearing abilities for 1 of 1 resident (R) reviewed for hearing (R47).-R47 has a severe hearing deficit and has not had working hearing aids for a long period of time. This has not been addressed, and assessments do not reflect accurate information.Findings include:The facility policy titled, Resident Assessments, last revised October 2025, includes information in the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment will consistently reflect information in the progress notes, plans of care, and resident observation/interviews.R47 was admitted to the facility on [DATE].On 05/31/26 at 9:49 AM, Surveyor interviewed R47 about the care R47 receives at the facility. R47 emphasized the need for Surveyor to speak very loudly as R47 is very hard of hearing. R47 stated they have hearing aids, but the hearing aids stopped working a while back when they remained in while showering.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-06-02 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure a resident with limited range of motion receives appropriate treatment and services to increase range of motion and/or to prevent further decrease in range of motion for 1 of 5 residents (R) (R32).-R32 did not receive consistent restorative care.-R32's medical record had incomplete and incorrect documentation for restorative care. Findings include:The facility policy titled, Restorative Nursing Services, last revised July 2025, includes: Residents will receive restorative nursing care as needed to help promote optimal safety and independence.Restorative goals and objectives are individualized and resident-centered, and are outlined in the resident's plan of care.R32 was admitted to the facility on [DATE].R32's medical record documents R32 has a program that includes passive range of motion to bilateral lower extremities every shift.Surveyor noted 14 days in March 2026, 17 days in April 2026, and 28 days in May 2026, the task was documented as not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-06-02 · tag F0699 — isolated
    Provide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility did not ensure residents (R) who are trauma survivors receive care in accordance with professional standards of practice and accounting for residents' experiences and preferences in order to eliminate or mitigate triggers that may cause re-traumatization for 1 of 1 resident with post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). (R25). -R25 is diagnosed with PTSD. Care plan does not identify type(s) of trauma, triggers, or interventions to prevent re-traumatization.Findings include: R25 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), anxiety, depression, personality disorder, mood (affective) disorder and altered mental status. R25 was admitted for therapy and monitoring following frequent falls at home and a fire with smoke inhalation. On [DATE] at 12:07 PM, Surveyor observed R25 sitting at a table in a small area next to the dining room. The door between the kitchen and dining room slammed shut causing a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-06-02 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not provide routine and emergency drugs and biologicals for the facility residents for 1 of 17 residents (R) reviewed (R37).-R37 did not have one routine medication available for 12 days with no interventions, alternatives, or monitoring.Findings include:On 06/02/26, Surveyor reviewed R37's medical record. R37 was admitted to the facility on [DATE].R37's Physician orders include Modafinil Oral Tablet 100 MG.give 1 tablet by mouth two times a day for sleep apnea which was ordered on 05/12/26.Surveyor reviewed R37's Medication Administration Record (MAR) for May 2026. The MAR indicated that from 05/12/26 through 05/23/26, R37's Modafinil was not given.R37's nursing progress notes documented:On 05/12/26 at 10:29 AM, Modafinil was not available from pharmacy.On 05/12/26 at 11:27 PM, Modafinil had a hold order for that day as the pharmacy would be sending the medication the next morning.On 05/13/26 at 8:19 AM, Modafinil was not available from pharmacy.On 05/13/26…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-11 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and record review, the facility did not ensure an allegation of misappropriation was thoroughly investigated for 1 of 1 resident (R) (R5) reviewed.The facility did not provide evidence of resident interviews and staff training on misappropriation.The facility's policy titled, Abuse/Neglect/Exploitation, read in part, Identifying and interviewing all involved persons, including the alleged victim, alleged perpetrator, witnesses, and others who might have knowledge of the allegations .Training staff on changes made and demonstration of staff competency after training is implemented.On 02/06/26, the facility reported R5 returned from the hospital on [DATE] and it was reported R5 had $200 missing. Staff had observed a $50 bill in R5's room on 02/05/26.The facility completed an investigation which included: -Interview with R5.-Search for the missing money, which was not found.-Contacting law enforcement.-Staff interviews.-Facility reimbursed R5 $50 that had been verified by staff.-The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-11 · tag F0628 — isolated
    Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure 1 of 3 residents (R7) reviewed for discharge process received the proper notice of transfer, reason for transfer, location of transfer, appeal rights, and name and address (mailing and email) with telephone number of the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman. In addition, the facility did not ensure R7 and/or their representative received written information on the duration of the bed hold policy, the reserve bed payment policy, and the right to return to the facility.Based on the Surveyor's investigation, there was no evidence of the following:-R7's admission to the facility.-R7's fall and incident at the facility.-R7's discharge from the facility.-Evidence the facility could not meet R7's needs.-R7 was provided with discharge notices and bed hold notice, with appeal rights upon discharge.-Communication with current hospital to assess transfer status and agreement to re-admit R7 to the facility.-A hoyer sling was ordered for R7.The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-11 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility did not ensure 1 resident (R1) of 3 residents reviewed for accidents received adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents in a sample of 7 residents. The facility did not have a Wanderguard alarm bracelet placed on R1 to notify staff of R1's attempts to elope from facility which could cause potential for harm if R1 left facility unsupervised. Findings include:The facility policy, titled Elopement, not dated, states in part, An elopement risk assessment should be conducted at time of admission.develop a specific elopement prevention care plan at time of admission for residents identified at risk for elopement.use an alarm system that notifies staff when an exit door is opened.The facility policy, titled Accidents and Supervision, not dated, states in part, Using specific interventions to try to reduce a resident's risk from hazards in the environment.ensuring that the interventions are put into action.Supervision is an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-10 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility did not provide appropriate skin assessments and treatment by professional standards of practice to maintain a resident's highest practicable level of physical well-being for 2 of 2 residents (R2 and R3) reviewed.Staff did not assess and document R2's surgical incision on the left upper extremity. Staff did not complete a wound comprehensive assessment when R3 first developed the wound. This is evidenced by:R2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged on 10/29/25. R2's current diagnoses include multiple fractures of pelvis with unstable disruption of pelvic ring, open wound left lower leg, traumatic subdural hemorrhage, fracture of the lower end of left radius, dislocation of left ulnohumeral joint, displace fracture of head of left radius, displace fracture of lateral epicondyle of left humerus, dislocation of right shoulder, fracture of body of sternum, contusion of lung, multiple fractures of ribs bilateral, pleural effusion, atelectasis, acute…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-10 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, facility did not implement professional standards of practice to ensure that a resident does not develop pressure injuries (PIs), receives necessary treatment and services to promote healing and prevent new PIs from developing for 1 of 1 resident (R) reviewed. (R4)R4 was admitted to the facility with an unstageable pressure injury to left heel. Staff did not complete a comprehensive PI assessment to include measurements and description of the PI. This is evidenced by:R4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R4's current diagnoses of hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting left non-dominant side, methicillin resistant staphylococcus aureus infection 11/12/24 and 3/20/25, pressure induced deep tissue damage of left heel, type 2 diabetes mellitus without complications, protein-calorie malnutrition, atrial fibrillation, chronic kidney disease stage 3A, anxiety disorder, and depression.R4's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] admission 5 day…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-29 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not update R1's care plan with new interventions and/or monitoring to prevent further potential elopements. The facility practice had the potential to affect 1 of 3 residents (R) (R1) reviewed. This was evidenced by the facility policy, titled Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation which states under section VII(A)(b): Defining how care provision will be changed and/or improved to protect residents receiving services. R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] under guardianship and with diagnoses that include benign neoplasm of meninges and mild cognitive impairment. R1's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) indicated R1 has a BIMS of 7 (moderately impaired); displays wandering and frequency behavior of these type 1 to 3 days; uses a walker and wheelchair independently, R1's elopement evaluation completed on 07/02/25 indicates in part, R1 has a history of elopement or attempted leaving the facility without informing staff. R1's care plan initiated on 07/03/25 for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-29 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident receives adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents, allowing a resident to leave the premises without the facility's knowledge and supervision. This situation represents a risk to the resident's health and safety for 1 of 3 residents (R) R1. This was evidenced by the facility policy, titled Elopement which states: This facility ensures that resident who exhibit wandering behavior and/or are at risk for elopement receive adequate supervision to prevent accidents, and receive care in accordance with their person-centered plan of care addressing the unique factors contributing to wandering or elopement risk. Under section labeled Elopement states: Occurs when a resident leaves the premises or a safe area with authorization. R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] under guardianship and with diagnoses that include benign neoplasm of meninges and mild cognitive impairment. R1's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-08 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility did not implement policy and procedures related to screening employees for a prior history of abuse, neglect, exploitation of residents, or misappropriation of resident property for 1 of 8 employees reviewed.The facility did not ensure their abuse policy was implemented when one employee's Background Information Disclosure (BID), Department of Justice Response (DOJ), and Government Findings report was not obtained before employee started working at facility. (Intern D).The facility policy, titled Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation dated 10/01/22 states: It is the policy of this facility to provide protections for the health, welfare and rights of each resident by developing and implementing written policies and procedures that prohibit and prevent abuse, neglect, exploitation and misappropriation of resident property.Under section labeled 1A. Screening states Potential employees will be screened for a history of abuse, neglect, exploitation or misappropriate of resident property. 1. Background, reference and credentials' checks shall…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-08 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and record review, the facility failed to revise the care plan for 1 of 3 residents (R) reviewed (R2). -R2's care plan indicated intervention of side rail. The care plan was not revised after removal of the side rail. Findings include: R2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]; diagnoses include congestive heart failure (CHF), morbid obesity, and anxiety disorder. R2's Minimum Data Set (MDS), completed on 04/22/25, confirmed R2 scored 15/15 during BIMS, indicating intact cognitive function. R2's care plan, last revised on 06/20/25, includes a focus of physical functioning deficit related to mobility impairment with intervention of assistive devices including side rail. Surveyor reviewed R2's bed rail assessment, dated 04/11/25, which showed bilateral side rails were indicated to serve as an enabler to promote independence, and R2 had expressed a desire to have side rails. Surveyor reviewed audits completed on 04/16/25, 04/23/25, 04/30/25, 05/08/25, and 05/16/25, by Speech-language…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-04-03 · tag F0801 — widespread
    Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility did not designate a person to serve as the director of food and nutrition services who had completed the minimum qualification requirements for the position. This practice could potentially affect all 48 residents residing in the facility. The facility's Dietary Manager (DM) C is currently enrolled but has not finished the Nutrition & Food Service Professional Program. The facility does not have a full-time Registered Dietician at the facility. Findings include: Surveyor requested and received the facility policy titled Dietary Manager, which is not dated. The policy reads in part: Required Qualifications: Minimal Requirements include one of the following: ~Certification as a dietary manager ~Certification as a food service manager ~Has an associates or higher degree in food service management or in hospitality, if the course of study includes food service or restaurant management, from an accredited institution of higher learning ~Has 2 or more years of experience in the position of director of food and nutrition services in a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-04-03 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility did not prepare, store and distribute food in a sanitary manner. This has the potential to affect all 48 residents. Dietary Aide (DA) D was observed pulling a tray of clean drinking glasses and plastic mixing containers from the dishwasher, stacking them together while wet and placing them in the cupboard while dripping water on the floor and counter. Surveyor observed the kitchen's handwashing sink with heavy lime and dirt build up on facet handles, drain, and basin. Surveyor observed items stored in refrigerators and freezers used to store resident food brought in from outside sources, not dated or labeled with resident names or use by dates. Findings include: It is the policy of the facility to ensure dishes are washed and air dried to prevent contamination. Surveyor requested the facility policy regarding washing dishes. Dietary Manager (DM) C provided policy titled Sanitization which is dated 1/2025. Policy notes the expectations that dishes will be allowed to air dry as discussed with DM C. DM C provided…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-04-03 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — widespread
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview and record review, the facility did not provide a safe functional, sanitary and comfortable environment for all 48 residents. Frayed carpet found on three units in the hallways. Spots on carpet on all four units throughout the building. Bathroom floor with stains in room [ROOM NUMBER]. Sections of walls with punctures, black marks, and missing paint. Findings: On 04/03/2025 at 8:30 AM, Surveyor noted frayed carpet on 100 hallway between rooms [ROOM NUMBERS]. There was a circular metal in the floor that is 6 inches in diameter with frayed carpet around it. Frayed carpet noted in sitting room outside of the dining room along the seam that is 3 feet from the wall with windows. This frayed carpet runs the full length of the room. On the 200 hallway outside of room [ROOM NUMBER], there is a circular metal in the middle of the hallway that has frayed carpet around it. On the 300 hallway carpet is frayed around 6-inch metal circle between room [ROOM NUMBER] and 311. There is a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-03 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility did not provide written notification requirements to the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman with resident transfers from the facility. This was observed for 3 of 4 residents (R) (R23, R30, and R195) reviewed that were transferred from the facility. - The Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman was not notified of R23, R30, and R195's transfers from the facility. Findings include: Example 1 R23 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including diabetes, urinary retention, catheter associated urinary tract infections, weakness, and unsteadiness on feet. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment completed on 03/14/25 confirmed R23 scored 12/15 during Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) indicating intact cognition. R23 requires staff assistance with all Activities of Daily Living (ADLs). On 04/01/25, Surveyor reviewed R23's record and noted R23 was hospitalized from [DATE]-[DATE] for influenza. Example 2 R30 was admitted to the facility…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-03 · tag F0625 — isolated
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility did not provide written notification requirements with resident transfers from the facility. This was observed for 2 of 4 residents (R) (R23 and R30) reviewed that were transferred from the facility. - R23 and R30 were transferred to the hospital while residing in the facility and did not have evidence they were provided the required transfer notice information. Findings include: The facility's policy and procedure titled Bed Hold Policy and Notice of Transfer, read in part .When a Resident is discharged to the hospital or goes on a leave of absence, the following bed hold policy takes effect: Medicaid/T19: Medicaid will hold a bed for you up to fifteen (15) days following the leave or until you waive your right to have the bed held, whichever is earlier. After the fifteenth (15) day you will be offered the first appropriate bed available. Medicare/Private Pay: We will hold a bed for you as long as you agree to continue to pay the room and board rate per day of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-03 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility did not develop and implement a person-centered care plan for each resident consistent with resident rights including services to attain or maintain the resident's highest or practicable physical, mental or psychosocial needs for 2 of 12 residents reviewed (R8, R195). R8 did not have an activity care plan including accommodations for vision and hearing deficits. R8 did not have preferences assessed for meal choices and interventions in place in care plan. R195 did not have a safe smoking care plan. Findings include: Example 1 R8 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Facility Policy titled Comprehensive Care Plans, last revised on 10/01/2022, states in part: Person-centered care means to focus on the resident as the locus of control and support the resident in making their own choices and having control over their daily lives. The policy also states in part: Resident's preferences will also be addressed in the plan of care. Minimum Data Set (MDS)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-03 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility did not ensure a resident with diabetic ulcers received necessary treatment and services to promote healing for 1 of 5 (R8) residents reviewed. -R8 did not receive active wound treatment orders for several days and the medical record did not have orders transcribed from wound clinic for nutritional supplements and protective boot to help promote wound healing and did not address recommendations from Registered Dietician (RD) to help promote wound healing. Findings include: R8 was admitted on [DATE]. Minimum Data Set (MDS), completed on 02/25/2025, confirmed R8 scored 9/15 during Brief interview for Mental Status (BIMS), indicating moderately impaired cognition. The facility policy titled Wound Management reads in part, Wound treatments will be provided in accordance with physician orders, including the cleansing method, type of dressing, and frequency of the dressing change. It also reads in part, In the absence or treatment orders, the licensed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-03 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of infections for 2 of 4 sampled residents (R96 and R20). *Observations of 1 of 2 residents with a catheter, the catheter bag was positioned in a manner that allowed it to drag across the floor as the resident moved about in their wheelchair. *During 1 of 3 dressing change observed clean dressing was contaminated as it touched the floor. This is evidenced by: Example 1 The facility Policy entitled Catheter Care, no date, does not address the positioning of the catheter bag. R96 was admitted to the facility in March 2025 and has diagnoses that include urinary retention, and benign prostatic hyperplasia. On 03/31/25 at 2:00 PM, Surveyor observed R96 in the hallway sitting in wheelchair with the catheter urine collection bag on the lowest part of the wheelchair cross bars.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-30 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident environment remained as free of accident hazards as possible having the potential to cause harm to 15 of 15 residents that use mechanical lifts (R1, R2, R3, R4, R5, R6, R7, R8, R9, R10, R11, R12, R13, R14, R15). Staff did not verify proper sling size or safe functioning of the mechanical lift prior to transfer of R1 on 11/22/24. The lift tipped over resulting in the sling bar striking R1 in the face resulting in a bruise and laceration below the left eye that required transfer to the hospital and tissue adhesive repair. Observations of transfers for R2, R3, and R4 demonstrate staff were not aware of how to determine proper sling size. Maintenance is not knowledgeable on lift inspections to ensure safety of lifts. Findings include: Proactive Medical Products Patient Sling Reference guide states, in part: It is very important to use the correct sized sling and make sure it is fitted properly prior to lifting. This…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-07-22 · tag F0837 — widespread
    Establish a governing body that is legally responsible for establishing and implementing policies for managing and operating the facility and appoints a properly licensed administrator responsible for managing the facility.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff and vendor interview, the Bedrock corporation governing body did not ensure adequate funds were made available to provide for the safe and efficient management of the facility. The failure to maintain current payment status with service providers and vendors has the potential to affect all 51 residents in the facility. The Bedrock corporate governing body failed to maintain current payment status with several service providers and vendors that resulted in vendors refusing to provide or providing discontinuation notices until payment is received, the governing body has not paid State bed tax and the facility pharmacy provider was abruptly terminated after a past due notice was issued including potential of disruption of service. The failure of the Bedrock governing body to maintain current contract payments has resulted in loss of service. Bedrock's corporation's failure to provide sufficient funding to maintain service/vendor contracts resulted in decreased options for services…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-22 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide needed service to maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for 1 of 3 residents (R)2 reviewed for transportation service for medical necessity. R2 was transferred by ambulance to the hospital on [DATE] at 4:15 p.m. Transportation was not provided for R2 to return to the facility from the hospital. R2 had to remain at the hospital from 9:00 p.m. on 07/08/24 until 9:08 a.m. on 07/09/24. Findings include: On 07/17/24 at 1:00 p.m., Surveyor reviewed R2's medical record. R2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of atrial fibrillation, cognitive disorder, type 2 diabetes mellitus, hypertension, obesity, hypercholesterolemia, hepatocellular carcinoma, and sleep apnea. R2's Minimum Data Set (MDS) admission assessment, dated 07/08/24, documents R2 is independent with eating, toileting hygiene, dressing, personal hygiene, bed mobility, transfers, and walking. R2's Brief Interview for Mental…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-06-05 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility did not provide sufficient nursing staff to provide nursing and related services to 20 of 53 residents (R) reviewed. (R13, R11, R14, R4, R12, R7, R8, R9, R1, R15, R16, R17, R18, R19, R20, R21, R22, R23, R28 and R29) This is evidenced by: Facility training completed on 4/24/24 on call light etiquette included the following: 1) Answer call lights promptly 2) Call lights are not to be turned off until needs are met 3) Always ask if you can help with anything else before exiting the room 4) No call light should be unanswered for longer than 10 minutes General resident information Surveyors requested information in relation to residents' falls and a list was provided. It lists 6 residents who were found on floor since May 1. Other witnessed falls include one fall from wheelchair, 4 falls while ambulating, 2 fall/bed incidents. The facility currently has 20 residents with treatments, 31 incontinent residents, 22 residents who require the assistance of 2 people, 24 residents on contact or enhanced barrier precautions, 3…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-22 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on random observation, interview and record review, the facility did not maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment to prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 6 of 12 residents (R) Staff did not change gloves or perform hand hygiene during 2 observation of incontinence cares for R10, R27, R40, R2 and R4. Staff did not use appropriate Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) during observation of entering room for a resident who was on contact Transmission Based Precautions (TBP) for R27. Finding include: Facility policy entitled Hand Hygiene states in part: Staff will perform hand hygiene when indicated, using proper technique consistent with accepted standards of practice; The use of gloves does not replace hand hygiene; The policy has a Hand Hygiene Table indicating the condition to which hand hygiene is expected to be conducted which states in part: Hand hygiene will be conducted when, during resident care, moving from a contaminated body site to a clean body…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-22 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility did not provide the necessary care to prevent the development of pressure injuries (PI) for R2, by not applying heel boots, not repositioning as directed, and not following prescribed treatment. The facility practices have the potential to affect 1 of 5 residents reviewed for pressure injuries (R2). Findings include: According to the National Pressure Injury Advisory Panel (NPIAP) 2019, page 115, . Repositioning and mobilizing individuals is an important component in the prevention of pressure injuries. The underlying cause and formation of pressure injuries is multifaceted; however, by definition, pressure injuries cannot form without loading, or pressure, on tissue. Extended periods of lying or sitting on a particular part of the body and failure to redistribute the pressure on the body surface can result in sustained deformation of soft tissues and, ultimately, in tissue damage . According to Wound Care Education Institute (2018), for immobile or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-22 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility did not ensure 2 of 3 residents reviewed for pain (R40 and R258) received necessary treatment and services consistent with professional standards of practice, to manage their pain. This is evidenced by: The facility policy titled Pain Management, dated 10/1/22 states, The facility must ensure that pain management is provided to residents who require such services, consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan and the residents' goals and preferences. The policy continues to state under Recognition, . 1. In order to help a resident attain or maintain his/her highest practicable level of physical\mental and psychosocial well-being and to prevent or manage pain, the facility will: a. Recognize when the resident is experiencing pain and identify circumstances when the pain can be anticipated. b. Evaluate the resident for pain and the cause(s) upon admission, during ongoing scheduled assessments . c.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-30 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure care plans were updated with resident's (R4) hygiene product preference for 1 of 4 residents reviewed. Findings: On 01/30/24, Surveyor reviewed grievance filed by R4, reporting 12/02/23 was the first day R4 was cleaned up. Staff were interviewed by Social Worker and Director of Nursing. Staff reported R4 was provided bed bath twice daily; however, regular soap was being used, not Dial soap, which is R4's preference. Grievance resolution on 12/03/23 included using Dial soap instead of regular soap; grievance documentation indicated R4's care plan would be updated. On 01/30/24 at 9:15 AM, Surveyor interviewed Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) C. CNA C reported staff are aware R4's skin breaks down easily and staff are conscious of ensuring R4 is repositioned frequently, is provided bed bath twice daily using Dial soap, and medicated powder applied. R4 had no other skin concerns. On 01/30/24 at 9:37 AM, Surveyor interviewed R4. R4 reported moisture associated skin damage (MASD) under left breast. R4 stated staff provide…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2024-01-30 · tag F0732 — widespread
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility did not ensure the posted nurse staffing information included census and the correct working staff at the beginning of each shift. This has the potential to affect all 55 residents. Findings include: On 01/30/24 at 10:30 AM, Surveyor noted that the nurse staff posting was missing the census for the day. Surveyor asked Director of Nursing (DON) B for a copy of the staff posting for the whole month of January. On 01/30/24 at 12:00 PM, Surveyor reviewed January's nurse staff postings and noticed none of the postings have a census listed. Surveyor noticed that the postings do not look like they have been corrected to indicate census change, staff call ins, or assignment changes. On 01/30/24 at 12:00 PM, Surveyor interviewed DON B asking if the nurse staff postings get updated every shift. DON B replied, I don't think so. Surveyor showed DON B and Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) A that on the staff posting where it has census there must be an accurate census based on real time and that the shifts need to reflect actual…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

“Disputed” is CMS’s own flag, not our reading: the CMS deficiency file records whether the home has formally contested a citation, and we reproduce that. IDR is Informal Dispute Resolution, run by the state survey agency that wrote the citation; IIDR is Independent Informal Dispute Resolution, a separate process before an outside entity, available when CMS has proposed a civil money penalty. They are different processes and we mark them differently. Two things to hold at once. A disputed citation is still a citation — it was written by a surveyor, it stands on the record unless and until it is changed, and we neither hide it nor discount it. And we cannot tell you how the dispute came out: CMS publishes that a citation is under dispute, not the outcome, so a tag marked here may since have been upheld, reduced, or deleted, and an unmarked tag may have been disputed and resolved before this file was cut. Ask the home what it disputed and why — it is entitled to tell you, and the answer is often the most informative thing on this page.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$15,939 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

  • $15,939 — penalty dated 2024-07-22

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to BEDROCK HEALTHCARE — 9 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 2 of 51.4+0.6 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 51.3+0.7 vs chain
Staffing 3 of 52.1+0.9 vs chain
Quality measures 3 of 52.7+0.3 vs chain
The other 8 homes this chain runs (chain average 1.4★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
CHOPP, MARTINIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF20%since 10/01/2019
CHOPP, PNINAIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF60%since 10/01/2019
CHOPP, SOLOMONIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF20%since 10/01/2019
OPAL HEALTHCARE WI LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/26/2025
GOODMAN, SHERRYIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/09/2025
MAHMOOD, RUTHIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/08/2025

CMS files one row per role, so the 12 rows in the source record cover these 6 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$8.2M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+4.0%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$420K
Related-party expense5% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 69%Medicare 11%Other / private 20%

This home reported $420K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$381per resident / day
operating cost
$11,585per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$397per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in WI

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Wisconsin Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Wisconsin
$10,646/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$12,319/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,540/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 525435. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-06-02, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next