Watertown Health Care Center
121 Hospital Dr., Watertown, WI 53098 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 112 certified beds · (920) 261-9220 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- CMS lists it as a Special Focus candidate — not on the watch list itself, but among the homes CMS is watching because of its recent inspection history
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Jun 2024
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605, F0607, F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0569)
- inspectors cited 5 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
- inspectors recorded 2 serious findings as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (76) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $278,229 in federal fines (most recent 2024-10-17)
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
- nursing-staff turnover (74%) runs well above the national median (45%)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 1 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 3 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 3 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 2 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 3 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 4.0% | 16.1% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 6.2% | 5.1% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 4.4% | 2.1% | 0.9% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.4% | 2.7% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 0.5% | 5.7% | 6.5% | better |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 1.7% | 3.3% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 10.9% | 18.4% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 19.6% | 16.9% | 18.9% | typical |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 95.0% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 12.3% | 5.0% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 25.9% | 24.6% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 33.3% | 15.8% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 4.2% | 1.2% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 90.0% | 82.2% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 26.2% | 23.1% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 10.5% | 15.5% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 2.21 | 1.66 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 3.69 | 2.29 | 1.80 | worse |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
49.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 90 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Therapy staffing: not reported. This home filed no therapist hours at all in its payroll data for this quarter. That is a gap in what it reported, and we do not read it as an absence of therapy — the homes that file nothing here include ones that discharged hundreds of Medicare rehab patients in the very same period, who plainly received therapy from someone. Because we cannot tell a home that under-reports from one that genuinely provides little, this home is left out of the comparison above rather than scored at zero. Ask it directly how many therapist hours a rehab resident gets, and on which days.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 49.0%CMS range 39.4–60.3 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 9.5%CMS range 6.8–13.2 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 92.6% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 6.3%CMS range 3.2–11.6 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.19 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 112 beds and averages 74.0 residents a day — about 66% occupied, or roughly 38 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.02 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.42 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.73 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.50 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.22 on weekdays — 22% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.51 to 0.20 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 74% is well above the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
76 citations, most serious first. The 22 most serious are shown; the remaining 54 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · J2026-06-09 · tag F0678 — failed to provide CPR when needed — isolatedProvide basic life support, including CPR, prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel , subject to physician orders and the resident’s advance directives.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, facility personnel failed to provide basic life support to a resident requiring such emergency care prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel and subject to related physician orders and the resident's advance directives for 1 of 7 residents (R) reviewed (R4.)R4's chosen code status was full code. R4 was found pulseless and nonbreathing; facility staff delayed notifying 911 and delayed initiating cardio pulmonary resuscitation (CPR.) Facility staff failed to utilize life support equipment such as an AED (Automatic External Defibrillator) while providing CPR to R4.The facility's failure to provide proper basic life support to a resident who wished to be a full code, including immediately starting CPR, utilizing the AED, and promptly calling 911, created a finding of immediate jeopardy that began on [DATE].Surveyor notified CNO D (Chief Nursing Officer) and DON B (Director of Nursing) of the immediate jeopardy on [DATE] at 3:19 PM. The immediate jeopardy was removed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Lcited before2024-11-14 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility does not have an effective infection control program to control the spread of infectious disease, in this case COVID-19; this has the potential to affect all 71 residents residing at the facility. Staff were observed going in and out of COVID positive rooms without appropriate PPE (Personal Protective Equipment). Staff were observed exiting COVID positive room with PPE on and doffing PPE in the hallway. Staff were observed not using source control. Staff were working with COVID symptoms and not tested. Facility is not utilizing dedicated equipment in COVID positive resident rooms. Privacy curtains are not being pulled between COVID positive and COVID negative residents. Staff were observed working with a COVID positive resident and then with same PPE about to work with a resident who was COVID negative. Observations of COVID positive residents smoking outside with non-COVID positive residents and not six feet apart. Food cart was left with the door…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-11-14 · tag F0694 — isolatedProvide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure that parenteral medications were administered consistent with professional standards of nursing practice for 1 of 1 resident (R29) reviewed for parenteral medications. R29 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with a midline for IV (intravenous) antibiotic treatment following a diagnosis of sepsis secondary to urinary tract infection with E. coli bacteremia (bacteria in the blood). On 7/27/24, LPN P (Licensed Practical Nurse) attempted to flush the midline and was unable to, noting that some of the normal saline ran down R29's arm. LPN P reported this to RN O (Registered Nurse) around 2:20 PM on 7/27/24. RN O did not complete an immediate assessment and when he did complete an assessment, he found the line to appear infiltrated (catheter delivering fluid into tissues instead of the vein). RN O attempted to remove the catheter without a physician order, and the midline broke, retaining a piece of catheter in R29's left arm. R29 was then sent to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-08-20 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents receive treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice when experiencing a change of condition for 1 of 3 sampled residents (R1). On [DATE], R1 experienced a change in condition exhibiting as shortness of breath and critically low oxygenation. The facility failed to recognize the change of condition as a medical emergency, complete a comprehensive cardiorespiratory data collection, and consult with the RN which resulted in a delay of treatment. LPN E's (Licensed Practical Nurse) failure to recognize a change of condition, complete a comprehensive cardiorespiratory data collection, and consult with the RN resulted in a delay of treatment and created a finding of Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) beginning on [DATE]. On [DATE] at 2:15 PM, NHA A (Nursing Home Administrator) was informed of the IJ. The IJ was removed on [DATE] when the facility recognized the IJ and implemented an immediate action plan. The IJ was corrected…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · J2024-06-19 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to protect a resident's right to be free from verbal/mental abuse by a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA). This affected 1 of 4 residents (R1) reviewed for abuse. R1 had a verbal altercation with CNA C (Certified Nursing Assistant) which led CNA C to become angry and perseverate on the altercation. CNA C then wrote a letter to R1 telling him that she was going to kill him. The facility's failure to keep residents safe from verbal/mental abuse created a finding of Immediate Jeopardy that began on 5/26/24. The Administrator was informed of Immediate Jeopardy on 6/11/24 at 1:26 PM. The immediate jeopardy was removed and corrected on 5/27/24. This is being cited as past noncompliance. Evidenced by: The facility's policy titled Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation dated 10/1/22, states in part It is the policy of this facility to provide protections for the health, welfare, and rights of each resident by developing and implementing written policies and procedures…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2024-03-04 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Example 4 R3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and has diagnoses that include alcohol abuse, anxiety disorder (a mental health disorder characterized by feelings of worry, anxiety, or fear that are strong enough to interfere with one's daily activities), and paraplegia (paralysis of the legs and lower body, typically caused by spinal injury). R3's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment, dated 11/20/23, shows that R3 has a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 indicating R3 is cognitively intact. R3's Smoking and Safety Assessment, dated 11/10/23, states, in part: AS_1. Smoking Safety Interaction 1. Smoking and Safety. 1.Supervision, designated smoking location, and smoking times are determined by facility policy. This evaluation will be utilized for the Resident's smoking care plan on admission and as indicated. 2. Which of the following products does the Resident use? Tobacco 3. Does the Resident display any of the following? Follows the facility's policy on location and time of smoking…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · K2024-01-19 · tag F0700 — patternTry different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, record reviews, and review of the facility's policy, the facility failed to assess the risk, advise of the risk and/or benefits, and obtain consent prior to use of bed rails with air mattresses for 8 residents (R23, R11, R16, R18, R19, R24, R25, and R28) on the skilled unit. R23's bed was equipped with an alternating air mattress as well as bed rails so she could assist with bed mobility. On 12/23/23, R23 was having a hard time breathing and wanted to get up. R23 was found entrapped between the bed rail and the air mattress. Facility staff were able to free her and began CPR (Cardio Pulmonary Resuscitation) which was unsuccessful. R11, R16, R18, R19, R24, R25, and R28 were also found to be using bed rails without a risk assessment, without being advised of the risks and benefits of the side rails, and without obtaining informed consent for their use. The failure to assess the risks of the side rail use with an alternating air mattress, advise the resident or their…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2026-06-09 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure 1 resident (R) of 3 residents reviewed for pressure injuries received the necessary care and services to promote healing and/or prevent pressure injuries from developing (R7.) R7 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a Stage 3 pressure injury (PI) to his sacrum and inability to turn and reposition himself. The facility failed to implement a turning and repositioning schedule until 5/5/26 (8 days later.) On 5/5/26, R7 was discovered with an avoidable Stage 2 PI to his left buttock. Subsequently, on 5/12/26, the PI to R7's left buttock worsened to an Unstageable PI. On 5/12/26, Physician T (a wound physician) documented Bed rest please following a PI assessment. Per DON B (Director of Nursing) this was likely the day Physician T discussed offloading pressure with R7's Guardian, who liked R7 to be up in his Broda chair. DON B indicates the root cause analysis for R7's PI to his left buttock is friction, shear and a little bit of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2026-05-18 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and record review, the facility did not ensure care and treatment in accordance with professional standards of practice for 4 residents (R) (R4, R5, R16, and R8) of 4 sampled residents. R4 was admitted to the facility with a surgical wound to the sternum that increased in size and became infected. Registered Nurse (RN) assessments were not completed timely and staff did not document changes in the wound or notify the physician of the changes. (This example is being cited at a level G (actual harm/isolated.) R5 went 4 days without a documented bowel movement (BM). The physician was not notified and R5 was not provided with prescribed as needed (PRN) medication. Staff did not consistently document whether or not R5 had a BM. In addition, R5's Treatment Administration Record (TAR) for colostomy care and surgical wound care was not thoroughly completed. R5's weekly skin checks were also not completed. R16 went multiple days without a documented BM. The physician was not notified and R16 was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-10-17 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure each resident receives care, consistent with professional standards of practice (SOP) to prevent pressure injuries (PI) and each resident with PIs receives necessary treatment and services, consistent with professional SOP, to promote healing, prevent infection, and prevent new injuries from developing in 1 of 4 sampled residents (R1). R1 admitted with no pressure injuries and was identified to be at risk for PI development. R1 developed an unstageable pressure injury. The facility failed to put aggressive measures in place to promote healing, prevent infection, and to prevent new PI from developing. Evidenced by: Facility policy, titled Pressure Injury Prevention Guide, dated 2016, includes: . it is the policy of the facility to implement evidence based interventions for all residents who are assessed at risk or who have a pressure injury present . individualized interventions will address specific factors identified in the resident's risk…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-08-20 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure that the resident's environment remains as free of accident hazards as is possible and did not ensure resident's care plans are up to date for 1 of 3 residents (R3) reviewed for accidents. R3 fell on 8/3/24, sustaining a laceration under his left eye that required stitches. This is evidenced by: The facility's Policy and Procedure entitled Falls Management Process dated 1/10/24 documents the following in part: .12. The nurse will determine the most appropriate intervention, implement, and update care plan . The facility's Policy and Procedure entitled Comprehensive Care Plan dated 3/1/23 documents the following in part: .3. The comprehensive care plan will describe, at a minimum, the following .f. Resident specific interventions that reflect the resident's needs and preferences .8. Qualified staff responsible for carrying out interventions specified in the care plan will be notified of their roles and responsibilities for carrying out the interventions, initially and when changes are made. R3 is a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2024-08-20 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to assess and provide appropriate treatment and services to achieve and maintain as much normal bowel and bladder function as possible for 2 of 4 sampled residents (R) (R4 and R2) reviewed with a bladder and bowel decline. R4 is being cited at severity level 3 (actual harm). R2 is being cited at severity level 2 (potential for more than minimal harm). R4 was continent of bowel and bladder prior to admission. R4 had a decline in bowel and bladder continence from 7/15/24 to present. R4 was assessed by the facility as continent on admission on [DATE] and currently is frequently incontinent of bladder and bowel. The facility failed to implement measures to improve R4's bowel and bladder continence and failed to update R4's care plan or establish a toileting program in an effort to restore R4's bowel and bladder continence. R2 had a decline in bowel and bladder continence from 6/20/24 to the present. R2 was continent of bowel and bladder on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-06-09 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — widespreadEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure that each resident received food and drinks that are safe and appetizing temperature. This has the potential to affect all 92 residents who reside at the facility. Surveyor received a test tray with cold foods that were not cold enough. Surveyor received a test tray with hot foods that were not hot enough. R2 voiced concerns about food quality and temperature. This is evidenced by: The facility policy, titled Preventing Foodborne Illness – Food Handling, reviewed 1/25, states in part: Policy Statement: Food will be stored, prepared, handled and served so that the risk of foodborne illness is minimized. Policy Interpretation and Implementation: 1. The facility recognizes that the critical factors implicated in foodborne illness are: .b. Inadequate cooking and improper holding temperatures. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Food Code 2022, includes in part: 3-501.16 Time/Temperature Control for Safety Food, Hot and Cold Holding.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-09 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolatedKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility did not ensure each resident has the right to privacy and confidentiality for 1 of 7 residents (R) reviewed (R7). During the survey, a camera (an electronic monitoring and recording device) was observed to be used in R7's room. Two of R7's family members have saved recordings with video and voice footage including all cares performed in the room (e.g., pericare, tube feedings, transfers, trach care, dressing, bathing, etc.). The facility does not turn off the camera or cover it up at any time to respect R7's privacy. Evidenced by:R7 was admitted on [DATE]. R7's most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an assessment reference date of 5/4/26 indicates under section C that R7s Cognitive Skills for Daily Decision Making is Severely impaired-never/rarely made decisionsOn 5/5/26 at 12:21 PM, during a Care Conference, the facility documents, in part, as follows. Family would like to put a camera in his (R7's) room. R7's does not have a Care Plan for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-09 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolatedHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not make prompt efforts to document, investigate, and resolve grievances a resident may have for 2 of 3 residents (R1 & R2) reviewed for grievances. R1 reported finding a paperclip in her cereal to CNA O (Certified Nursing Assistant), who did not follow up appropriately to address this concern. R2 voiced a concern and the facility did not follow its grievance policy. This is evidenced by: The facility policy, titled Grievance Policy, dated 9/15/25, states in part: Policy Statement: The facility ensures that all residents have the right to voice grievances without discrimination, reprisal, or fear of retaliation.Residents and representatives will be informed throughout the process, and grievances will be promptly investigated and resolved. Policy Interpretation and Implementation: .Investigation and Resolution: Investigations may include interviews, medical record reviews, and consultation with staff or family members. Written resolutions will summarize the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-09 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolatedPrevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure that each resident's drug regimen is free from unnecessary drugs for 1 of 1 resident (R5) receiving a psychotropic medication. R5 was prescribed Quetiapine, an anti-psychotic medication, scheduled twice daily and PRN (as needed), Cymbalta, an anti-depressant, scheduled daily, Lorazepam, an anti-anxiety medication PRN, Haldol, an anti-psychotic medication PRN, and Remeron, an anti-depressant, scheduled daily. R5's care plan does not address the use of anti-psychotic medications. This is evidenced by: Please note: the survey team requested a psychotropic medication policy but did not receive one from the facility. Per the SOM (State operations manual) An unnecessary drug is any drug when used- (1) In excessive dose (including duplicate drug therapy); or (2) For excessive duration; or (3) Without adequate monitoring; or (4) Without adequate indications for its use; or (5) In the presence of adverse consequences which indicate the dose should be…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-09 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident receives adequate supervision for 1 of 3 residents (R5) reviewed for elopement. On 5/18/26, R5 attempted to exit the building, setting off the door alarm. There was a 3-minute delay in the door alarm resetting. During this delay, the staff failed to adequately supervise R5, who was then able to exit the building and was found in the ER (Emergency Room) waiting room next door to the facility. This is evidenced by: Facility policy titled Elopement, undated, states in part: Policy: This facility ensures that residents who exhibit wandering behavior and/or are at risk for elopement receive adequate supervision to prevent accidents, and receive care in accordance with their person-centered plan of care. Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines: . 3. The facility is equipped with door locks/alarms to help avoid elopements. 4. Alarms are not a replacement for necessary supervision. Staff are to be vigilant in responding…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-09 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain acceptable parameters of nutritional status and consult with the residents' Physician on this for 1 of 3 residents (R7) reviewed for nutrition. R7 did not have a nutrition care plan. R7 experienced a significant weight loss of 4.29% in one week (13.5# loss) and the facility did not notify the physician. Evidenced by: Facility policy: Weight Monitoring states in part: . Process. Based on the resident's comprehensive assessment, the facility will ensure that all residents maintain acceptable parameters of nutritional status. 1. The facility will utilize a systemic approach to optimize a resident's nutritional status. This process includes: a. Identifying and assessing each resident's nutritional status and risk factors. b. Evaluating and analyzing the assessment information. c. Developing and consistently implementing pertinent approaches. d. Monitoring the effectiveness of interventions and revising them as necessary. 2. A comprehensive…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-09 · tag F0745 — failed to provide medically-related social services — isolatedProvide medically-related social services to help each resident achieve the highest possible quality of life.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility did not provide medically related social services to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident for 1 of 3 residents (R2) reviewed for transfer referrals.R2 had been requesting for 6 weeks for social services to make the necessary referrals for her to move to a facility closer to family. The facility failed to make the requested referrals.Evidenced by:The facility policy, titled Social Services, dated 11/2025, indicates the following, in part: . Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines: . 2. The facility, regardless of size, will provide medically-related social services to each resident, to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, or psychosocial well-being. 3. Any need for medically-related social services will be documented in the medical record. 4. The social worker, or social service designee, will pursue the provision of any identified need for medically-related social services of the resident. Attempts to meet the needs of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-18 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff and resident interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure 2 residents (R) (R9 and R13) of 23 sampled residents were treated with dignity and respect that promoted maintenance or enhancement of quality of life. R9 was observed being assisted by staff in the hallway and to an activity. R9's entire back and side were exposed.R13 was observed sitting in the common area wearing only a t-shirt and an incontinence brief.Findings include:The facility's Resident Rights Policy, dated, 1/5/26, states in part; .Resident Rights.The resident has the right to a dignified existence, self-determination, and communication with and access to persons and services inside and outside the facility.the resident has a right to be treated with respect and dignity.1. R9 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including heart failure, muscle weakness, obesity, anxiety, major depressive disorder, and multiple sclerosis (a chronic autoimmune disease of the central nervous system).R9's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-05-18 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure 2 residents (R) (R11 and R12) of 23 sampled who need assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs) received the necessary care and services.R11 was observed to have whiskers on the chin and chin area. R11 stated R11 did not like having whiskers and preferred to be shaved. R12 was observed to have a bowel movement while laying in bed. Despite reporting the bowel movement to staff, R12 was not assisted for 35 minutes.Findings include:The facility's Activities of Daily Living (ADLs), Supporting policy, dated 4/2025, states in part; .Residents who are unable to carry out activities of daily living independently receive the services necessary to maintain good nutrition, grooming, and personal and oral hygiene .Appropriate care and services are provided for residents who are unable to carry out ADLs independently, with the consent of the resident, and in accordance with the plan of care, including appropriate support and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-18 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff and resident interview and record review, the facility did not ensure the necessary care and services were provided to prevent pressure injuries from developing and/or promote healing for 1 resident (R) (R10) of 5 sampled residents.R10 developed an unstageable deep tissue injury on the sacrum and bilateral buttocks. Repositioning was not documented in accordance with the facility's policy. In addition, air mattress function was not documented on R10's Treatment Administration Record (TAR) for multiple shifts from 4/10/26 through 4/19/26.Findings include:The facility's Repositioning policy, revised 5/2013, indicates: The purpose of this procedure is to provide guidelines for the evaluation of resident repositioning needs, to aid in the development of an individualized care plan for repositioning, to promote comfort for all bed- or chair-bound residents, and prevent skin breakdown, promote circulation, and provide pressure relief for residents .1. Repositioning is a common, effective intervention…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 54 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-18 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and record review, the facility did not provide the necessary respiratory care and services for 1 resident (R) (R8) of 1 sampled resident.R8 had a physician order for bronchial hygiene using Cough Assist (a device that clears secretions from the lungs by gradually applying positive air pressure to the airway and then rapidly shifting to negative air pressure, stimulating a deep natural cough to assist with clearing mucus and secretions) treatments twice daily. The treatments were not consistently completed.Findings include: According to the National Institutes of Health (NIH) article PMC7902008 retrieved 5/13/26, .Cough Assist (or Mechanical Insufflator/Exsufflator): The Mechanical Insufflator/Exsufflator (I/E) is a device that produces changes in the airflow inside the bronchial tree in such a way as to vicariate the cough .It is used mainly in patients with neuromuscular pathologies or respiratory muscle deficiency, who have a hypovalid or ineffective cough. An ineffective cough causes…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-18 · tag F0774 — isolatedHelp the resident with transportation to and from laboratory services outside of the facility.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff and resident interview and record review, the facility did not assist in making transportation arrangements to and from the source of service for 1 resident (R) (R2) of 1 sampled resident.R2 missed a dentist appointment due to transportation issues on 4/16/26. R2 stated R2 missed other appointments in the past.Findings include:The facility's Transportation for Medical Appointments Policy states in part: .will assist residents with coordinating transportation to medically necessary appointments outside the facility while supporting resident choice and ensuring appropriate communication and documentation .R2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including chronic pain syndrome, anxiety disorder, post-traumatic stress disorder, and contusion of left upper arm.On 5/12/26 at 10:30 AM, R2 indicated R2 missed a dentist appointment on 4/16/26 and had to reschedule due to transportation issues. R2 indicated R2 missed a lot of appointments in the past.Surveyor reviewed R2's progress notes. A…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-05-18 · tag F0825 — isolatedProvide or get specialized rehabilitative services as required for a resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and record review, the facility did not ensure therapy services were provided for 1 resident (R) (R10) of 2 sampled residents.R10 had an order for Speech Therapy evaluation and treatment (dated 4/10/26). R10 was not seen by Speech Therapy while residing in the facility from 4/10/26 through 4/29/26.Findings include:The facility's undated Therapy policy indicates: .Therapy departments will have an established procedure for receiving and responding to requests for therapy services whether it be a referral directly from a physician to assume responsibility for management of one or more of a resident's specified problems, or for consultation or screening to determine if a resident is a candidate for skilled therapy services .The Director of Rehabilitation (DOR) will establish a process for distributing therapy referrals to the appropriate therapy discipline(s) .The DOR will ensure therapists are provided with clear expectations for how quickly therapy responds to all referrals .All referrals…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-12 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — patternHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff and resident interview and record review, the facility did not ensure grievances were thoroughly investigated and resolved for 6 residents (R) (R66, R14, R35, R7, R56, and R32) of 34 sampled residents. R66 reported concerns about the laundry process and missing items. R66 stated R66 was missing a sweater and a pair of pajama pants. R14 reported that laundry is frequently lost. R14 stated R14 was missing a nightgown with red cardinals that was reported to staff. R35, R7, and R56 reported concerns about the laundry process and missing items. R32 arrived at the facility in a wheelchair that was borrowed from a friend. R32 reported to staff that the wheelchair went missing approximately 4 days after R32 was admitted . The grievance was not thoroughly investigated or resolved.Findings include: The facility's Grievance policy, dated 9/15/25, indicates: The designated Grievance Official will: receive and track grievances through to resolution; provide written grievance resolutions to residents or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-03-12 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — patternDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interview and record review, the facility did not implement written policies and procedures that prohibit and prevent abuse for 6 (Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA)-DD, CNA-EE, CNA-FF, Activity Aide (AA)-GG, Maintenance Staff (MS)-HH, and CNA-II) of 10 staff reviewed for caregiver background checks. The facility did not ensure timely completion of CNA-DD's caregiver background check. The facility did not ensure a caregiver background check was completed for CNA-EE. The facility did not ensure timely completion of CNA-FF's caregiver background check. The facility did not ensure a caregiver background check was completed before allowing AA-GG to work with residents. The facility did not ensure a caregiver background check was completed before allowing MS-HH to work in resident care areas. The facility did not ensure timely completion of CNA-II's caregiver background check. Findings include: The facility's undated Abuse/Neglect/Exploitation policy indicates: It is the policy of the facility to provide protections for the health, welfare, and rights of each resident by…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-03-12 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and record review, the facility did not develop and/or implement an individualized comprehensive care plan for 3 residents (R) (R82, R74, and R72) of 26 sampled residents.R82 reported an allegation of misappropriation. The facility's investigation indicated a safe keeping of valuables care plan would be implemented. The facility did not implement a safe keeping of valuables care plan for R82.R74 received dialysis services. The facility did not implement a dialysis care plan for R74.R72 had a diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease. The facility did not implement an Alzheimer's disease/dementia care plan for R72.Findings include: The facility's Comprehensive Care Plans policy, dated 1/2026, indicates: .3. The comprehensive care plan will describe, at a minimum, the following: a. The services that are to be furnished to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. The facility's Dementia-Clinical policy, revised November 2018, indicates: .1.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-12 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff and resident interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure the accurate administration of medication for 9 residents (R) (R71, R13, R66, R67, R14, R15, R23, R58, and R63) of 9 sampled residents. R71 had an order for acetic acid that was unclear regarding application and use. R71 was not administered 11 of 44 doses. R13's methenamine hippurate for frequent urinary tract infections (UTIs) was not restarted timely after a hospital stay. Medications for R66, R67, R14, R15, R23, R58, and R63 were not administered timely or in accordance with physician orders. n 3/9/26. Findings include: The facility's Medication Administration policy, dated 10/25/14, indicates: Medications are administered as prescribed in accordance with good nursing principles and practices .The facility has sufficient staff and a medication distribution system to ensure safe administration of medications without unnecessary interruptions. A schedule of routine dose administration times is established by the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-12 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff and resident interview, and record review, the facility did not establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to prevent the transmission of communicable disease and infection. This practice had the potential to affect more than 4 of the 77 residents residing in the facility. Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA)-NN did not complete appropriate hand hygiene during cares for R72. R13 was on contact precautions. Assistant Administrator (AA)-M entered R13's room without completing hand hygiene or donning appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE). Registered Nurse (RN)-Y did not complete appropriate hand hygiene during medication preparation and administration for R14, R15, R23, and R58.Hand hygiene was not offered to multiple residents prior to dining, including R73 and R66.Findings include: The facility's hand hygiene policy, dated 2023, indicates: Bedrock Healthcare facilities recognize hand hygiene as the primary measure to prevent the transmission of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-12 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and record review, the facility did not ensure 2 residents (R) (R71 and R84) of 26 sampled residents were free of significant medication errors. R71 was admitted to the facility with a diagnosis of osteomyelitis. R71 did not receive three doses of intravenous (IV) antibiotics as ordered. R84 was admitted to the facility with sepsis from a soft tissue infection and right calf cellulitis and abscess. R84 did not receive two scheduled doses of IV antibiotics. R84 requested to go to the hospital so R84 would not miss another dose. Findings include: The facility's Medication Administration policy, dated 10/25/14, indicates: Medications are administered as prescribed in accordance with good nursing principles and practices and only by persons legally authorized to do so. Personnel authorized to administer medications do so only after they have been properly oriented to the facility's medication distribution system .Preparation: .4. Five Rights - Right resident, right drug, right dose, right…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-12 · tag F0774 — isolatedHelp the resident with transportation to and from laboratory services outside of the facility.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff and resident interview and record review, the facility did not have reliable transportation to and from the source of service for 1 resident (R) (R13) of 2 sampled residents. R13 had a baclofen pump that needed to be changed. R13 had multiple missed appointments due to transportation issues prior to getting the pump changed.Findings include: Between 3/9/26 and 3/12/26, Surveyor reviewed R13's medical record. R13 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses including paraplegia, unspecified injury at T1 level of thoracic spinal cord, anxiety, and depression. R13's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 1/19/26, had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15 which indicated R13 had intact cognition. On 3/9/26 at 8:19 AM, Surveyor interviewed R13 who indicated there were concerns with transportation when R13 needed to get R13's baclofen pump changed. R13 stated R13 made it to the appointment on the fourth try. R13 stated the first time, the facility did not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-14 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, record review, and review of the facility's policy, the facility failed to ensure the results of an abuse investigation were submitted to the State Agency (SA) within five working days for 1 resident (R) (R4) of 2 sampled residents reviewed for allegations of abuse.The facility submitted an initial report to the SA on 11/22/25 for an allegation of abuse involving R4. The final investigative report report was due on 12/1/25. The facility did not submit the final investigative report until 12/3/25.Findings include:Review of the facility's undated Abuse/Neglect/Exploitation policy indicates: The Administrator should/will follow up with government agencies during business hours to confirm the initial report was received and to report the results of the investigation when final within 5 (five) working days of the incident, as required by state agencies.Review of R4's admission Record revealed R4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of R4's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-01 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff and resident interview, the facility did not ensure there were sufficient supplies for 1 of 4 Residents (R2).R2 indicated the facility ran out of the brief size R2 needed and R2 had to wear two briefs instead of one. Staff interviews verified the facility frequently ran out of wipes, briefs, and wash cloths used for resident care. Findings include:On 9/24/25, Surveyor observed the facility's supply closets which contained brief and wipes. Staff interviews indicated the supplies will be gone by the end of the week. On 9/24/25 at 9:02 AM, Surveyor interviewed R2 who indicated the facility runs out of the briefs that R2 uses and staff have to use two different briefs to make one brief. R2 stated the facility also runs out of wipes and staff don't cleanse R2 when they change R2. R2 indicated it occurred at least five or six times since R2 was admitted in April. (R2's medical record indicated R2 was dependent on staff for toileting and required partial/moderate assistance with hygiene. R2 was alert and oriented and did not have an activated Power of Attorney (POA).) On…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-01 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolatedKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and staff and resident interview, the facility did not provide adequate privacy during cares in a double occupancy room for 1 of 4 Residents (R2).R2 reported a concern with a male visitor in the room while staff provided care for R2. Findings include:On 9/24/25, Surveyor reviewed R2's medical record. R2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnosis including muscle wasting, atrophy (is the partial or complete wasting away of a part of the body.), osteoarthritis, pain syndrome, dysthymic disorder (persistent depressive disorder (PDD), is a chronic form of depression characterized by a low mood lasting for at least two years), and anxiety disorder.R2's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 7/15/25, indicated R2 was dependent on staff for toileting and transfers, required substantial/maximal assistance with dressing, and required partial/moderate assistance with hygiene. R2 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15 which indicated R2 had intact…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-01 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility did not ensure that a resident who needs respiratory care is provided such care consistent with professional standards of practice for 1 of 1 residents (R6) reviewed for tracheostomy (an opening surgically created through the neck into the trachea in which a tube is inserted to provide an airway to allow air to fill the lungs) care.During R6's tracheostomy care, facility staff did not maintain sterile technique.This is evidenced by:The facility's policy Tracheostomy Care, dated 10/23, includes: The purpose of this procedure is to guide tracheostomy care. General Guidelines 1. Aseptic (the practice of using methods to prevent contamination) technique must be used; c. during tracheostomy tube changes. Sterile gloves must be used during aseptic procedures.The facility's policy Infection Prevention and Control Program, revised 7/25, includes: standard precautions: Hand hygiene shall be performed in accordance with our facility's established hand hygiene…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-01 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, and record review, the facility did not maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to prevent the development and transmission of communicable disease and infection for 1 of 1 Residents (R2).During the provision of peri-care for R2, staff did not properly change gloves and complete hand hygiene. Findings include:The facility's Infection Prevention and Control Policy Program, dated 7/2025, indicates: The facility has established and maintains an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable disease and infection as per accepted national standards and guidelines .5. Standard precautions: .b. Hand hygiene shall be performed in accordance with our facility's established hand hygiene procedures. c. All staff shall use personal protective equipment (PPE) according to established facility policy governing the use of PPE. (Of note: A…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-19 · tag F0569 — isolatedNotify each resident of certain balances and convey resident funds upon discharge, eviction, or death.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure that a resident, with a personal fund deposited with the facility, had conveyance of the resident's funds within 30 days of discharge and a final accounting of those funds to the individual or probate administering the resident's estate, in accordance with State law for 1 of 1 resident reviewed (R1) for trust accounts. R1 discharged from the facility on 3/25/24. R1's account was still active at facility with a balance of $2520.00. There was no conveyance of R1's account after resident discharged and no final accounting of those funds to R1's Health Care Power of Attorney (HCPOA). This is evidenced by: Facility's admission packet, dated 3/2020, includes: . Payment Policy- Payment is required one month in advance and the Facility's Business Office can provide information as to when payment is due each month. A one-month deposit of the daily rate is due upon admission. This deposit will be held in an interest-bearing account and may be applied to outstanding balances with resident and/or legal representative. If the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-11-14 · tag F0847 — widespreadInform resident or representatives choice to enter into binding arbitration agreement and right to refuse.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not implement an established process of assessing a resident's cognitive ability to understand an arbitration agreement before obtaining a signature for residents; and did not ensure the staff responsible for the arbitration agreement had complete understanding of an arbitration agreement and was able to thoroughly explain the agreement for complete resident/reasonable party understanding. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all 71 residents who resided in the facility and went through the admission process as arbitration agreements is part of the facility's admission process. R25, R12, R128, R129 and R72's resident representative voiced concerns regarding not fully understanding the arbitration agreement they signed upon admission to the facility. R25, R128, and R129 indicated they wanted to revoke their arbitration agreement. RR OO indicated the arbitration agreement was not explained to him fully and he would not have wanted to sign the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-14 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents (R) received adequate supervision to prevent accidents for 2 of 2 sampled residents (R57 and R56) and 3 supplemental residents (R36, R63, and R35) reviewed for the charging of their electric wheelchairs. R57's electric wheelchair was plugged in and charging in his room. R35's electric wheelchair was in her room along with her charging cord for her electric wheelchair. Surveyor observed R56's power wheelchair charger plugged into the wall in room. Surveyor observed R36's power wheelchair charger plugged into the wall in room. Surveyor observed R63's power wheelchair charger plugged into the wall in room. This is evidenced by: The facility policy Electric Wheelchair Policy, implements 3/8/20, states, in part: Due to the potential for fire or explosion, all electric wheelchairs will be recharged in an area which is not used by the residents for sleeping and which has no oxygen in the vicinity. Example 1 On 11/5/24 at 11:34…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-14 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and policy review, the facility did not ensure that all residents receive food at a palatable temperature for 1 of 4 hallways and 1 of 1 test trays. Residents voiced concerns with receiving hot foods cold. Surveyor requested test tray. Hot foods temped cold and cold foods temped warm. R39 and R32 stated the food is cold. Evidenced by: The facility policy, Record of Food Temperatures, with no date, states, in part; .2. Hot foods will be held at 135 degrees or greater .11. No food will be served that does not meet the food code standard temperatures . Example 1 On 11/5/24 at 11:40AM, Surveyor requested a meal tray down the 100 hallway. Pork with gravy temped at 114.2 F, potatoes 124.7 F, and red juice temped at 50.1 F. Hot foods were cold and drink was warm. On 11/6/24 at 4:58PM, DM R (Dietary Manager) indicated DM R completes weekly audits on room meal trays. DM R indicated the food temperatures really depend on the resident's personal preference. DM R indicated understanding when…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-14 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure residents were treated with respect and dignity and cared for in a manner to enhance their quality of life for 1 (R5) of 3 residents reviewed for resident rights. R5 voiced concern with staff not assisting her out of bed after using the bed pan. R5 indicated the interactions with staff make her feel like a child. R5 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnoses including stroke, anxiety disorder, major depressive disorder, pain, adult psychological abuse, kidney failure, muscle wasting, vascular disease, and need for assistance with personal cares. R5 most recent MDS (Minimum Data Set) with ARD (Assessment Reference Date) of 10/8/24, indicates R5 has a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 15 indicating R5 is cognitively intact. R5 is own person. R5's Comprehensive Care Plan, states, in part; .Focus R5 has a physical functioning deficit related to left side hemiparesis. Date initiated: 2/16/23 .Toileting: R5 uses the bedpan…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-14 · tag F0554 — isolatedAllow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure that self-administration of medications was determined to be clinically appropriate for 1 of 1 supplemental residents (R1) investigated for self administration of medication. Surveyor observed R1 to have medication at bedside. R1 did not have a self-administration of medication assessment completed. Evidenced by: The facility policy, entitled, Resident Self Administration Medication, dated 3/1/20, states, in part: .A resident may only self-administer medications after the facility's interdisciplinary team has determined which medications may be self-administered safely.2. Resident's preference will be documented on the appropriate form and placed in the medical record. 3. When determining if self-administration is clinically appropriate for a resident, the interdisciplinary team should at a minimum consider the following: a. The medications appropriate and safe for self-administration; . g. The resident's ability to ensure that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-14 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolatedHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure grievances were documented and thoroughly resolved for 2 of 23 sampled residents (R5 and R29.) R5 voiced concern regarding staff not assisting her in getting back up after she uses the bed pan. R5 indicated this makes her feel like a child and staff will say, We aren't playing the up and down game. R29 voiced a concern regarding being left on the commode and filed a grievance. Staff did not follow-up with R29 regarding the resolution of the grievance. Evidenced by: The facility policy Grievances dated 3/1/19, states in part: .The facility will ensure prompt resolution to all grievances, keeping the resident and the resident representative informed throughout the investigation and resolution process .G. Any employee of this facility who receives a complaint shall immediately attempt to resolve the complaint within their role and authority .As necessary, the Grievance Official and facility leadership will take immediate action to prevent further…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-14 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Example 2 R10 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including post-traumatic stress disorder, dementia with psychotic disturbance, and anxiety disorder. R10's quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated [DATE], question section N0450 B: Has a gradual dose reduction been attempted is marked NO, indicating a GDR (Gradual Dose Reduction) has not been attempted. Section N0450 C: Date of last attempted GDR: was not answered. On [DATE], R10's Risperdal oral tablet 0.5 mg was reduced from four times a day to three times a day. R10's physician orders dated [DATE] include Risperdal oral tablet 0.5mg three times a day. On [DATE] at 3:21 PM, Surveyor interviewed DON B (Director of Nursing) regarding the MDS process. DON B indicated the facility follows the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) Manual for completing the MDS. DON B indicated the [DATE] quarterly MDS should have been completed correctly to include R10's GDR that was completed on [DATE]. Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-14 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and medical record review, facility staff did not provide care and treatment in accordance with professional standards of practice for 2 of 22 sampled residents (R56 and R68). Surveyor observed R56's Medtronic to be unplugged rendering it unable to transmit data timely to the cardiac clinic that monitors R56's pacemaker. R68 was not weighed daily per physician order. Evidenced by: The facility policy, Weight Monitoring, no date, states, in part; .Based on resident's comprehensive assessment, the facility will ensure that all residents maintain acceptable parameters of nutritional status, such as usual body weight or desirable body weight range .5. A weight monitoring schedule will be developed upon admission for all residents: .d. If clinically indicated- monitor weight daily . Example 1 R56 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including presence of cardiac pacemaker. On 11/4/24 at 2:04 PM facility staff unplugged R56's Medtronic/pacemaker monitoring system from a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-14 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the medication regimen was free from unnecessary medications for 1 of 5 residents (R10) reviewed for unnecessary medications. R10 does not have a timely Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS) test. This is evidenced by: The facility policy Use of Psychotropic Med implemented 4/24/24, states, in part: Residents are not given psychotropic drugs unless the medication is necessary to treat a specific condition, as diagnosed and documented in the clinical record, and the medication is beneficial to the resident, as demonstrated by monitoring and documentation of the resident's response to the medication(s) . Psychotropic drugs include, but are not limited to the following categories: antipsychotics, antidepressants, anti-anxiety, and hypnotics .Residents who receive an antipsychotic medication will have an AIMS test performed on admission, quarterly, with a significant change in condition, change in antipsychotic medication, PRN (As Needed) or as…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-14 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure that it was free of medication error rates of 5% or greater. There were 2 errors out of 31 opportunities that affected 1 out of 3 residents (R1) included in the medication pass task, which resulted in an error rate of 6.45%. LPN N (Licensed Practical Nurse) did not prime R1's insulin pens before administration. (Of note, if insulin pens are not primed the resident may not receive the correct dose of insulin.) This is evidenced by: The facility policy entitled, Medication Administration, dated 3/1/19, states, in part: Medications are administered by licensed nurses, or other staff who are legally authorized to do so in this state, as ordered by the physician and in accordance with professional standards of practice . (Of note, the facility policy did not contain information on priming of insulin pens) The facility policy entitled, Medication Errors, dated 3/1/19, states, in part: .1. The facility shall ensure medications will be…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-14 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure residents are free of significant medication errors for 1 of 1 resident's (R329). R329 had an order for Novolin 70/30 FlexPen (Insulin) and Metoprolol Tartrate 25 MG (Lowers blood pressure), that was not administered on 10/12/24 and 10/13/24, missing a total of two doses of his daily insulin and four doses of his blood pressure medication. This is evidenced by: The facility policy titled, Medication Administration, dated 3/1/19, states in part: Medications are administered by licensed nurses, or other staff who are legally authorized to do so in this state, as ordered by the physician and in accordance with professional standards of practice . Policy Explanation and Guidelines: . 8. Obtain and record vital signs, when applicable or per physician orders . 10. Review MAR (Medication Administration Record) to identify medication to be administered . 14. Administer medication as ordered in accordance with manufacturer specifications . 17. Sign MAR after administered. For those medications requiring vital signs, record…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-14 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Example 3 R32 admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that include, in part: other chronic pancreatitis, pseudocyst of pancreas, personal history of other diseases of the digestive system. R32's MDS (Minimum Data Set), dated [DATE], indicates BIMS (Brief Interview of Mental Status) score of 15, indicating R32 is cognitively intact. On [DATE] at 8:34 AM, Surveyor observed resident taking Creon (a prescription medication used to treat pancreatic insufficiency) out of her bedside cabinet, top drawer. LPN N (Licensed Practical Nurse) indicated that the medication was supposed to be locked in a lock box/bag and would need to be removed from R32's room. R32 indicated that staff had never discussed the need to keep medication locked up. On [DATE] at 11:13 AM, Surveyor interviewed DON B (Director of Nursing), DON B indicated that self-administered medications kept in a resident's room are to be stored in a locked drawer or a lock box. Based on observation, interview and policy review the facility did not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-14 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — isolatedImplement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility did not ensure that their antibiotic stewardship program that includes antibiotic use protocols and a system to monitor antibiotic use was in place for 2 supplemental residents (R64 and R35). R64 was treated with an antibiotic when she didn't meet the facility's standard of practice (McGeer). R35 was treated with an antibiotic when she didn't meet the facility's standard of practice. This is evidenced by: The Facility's Policy and Procedure entitled Antibiotic Stewardship Program undated, documents in part: .4. The program includes antibiotic use protocols and a system to monitor antibiotic use. a. Antibiotic use protocols: i. Nursing staff shall assess residents who are suspected to have an infection and complete an SBAR (Situation, Background, Assessment, and Recommendation) form prior to notifying the physician. ii. Laboratory testing shall be in accordance with current standards of practice. iii. The facility use McGeer Criteria to define infections. iv. Criteria specific to each state are used to determine whether or not to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-08-20 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespreadProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure that sufficient nursing staff was provided to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident. This affected 4 of 4 halls and has the potential to affect all 72 residents (R) residing at the facility. R5, R7, R9, R4, and R2 voiced concerns regarding not having enough staff to meet their basic needs. Residents also voiced long call light wait times. Facility staff stated there are tasks that they are not able to get done due to not having enough staff per shift. Evidenced by: The Facility Assessment Tool, dated, 8/18/17, states, in part: .Nursing facilities will conduct, document, and annually review a facility-wide assessment, which includes both their resident population and the resources the facility needs to care for their residents .The purpose of the assessment is to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents .The intent of the facility assessment is for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-20 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure a dignified existence and self-determination in choices which affected 1 of 9 resident (R4) out of a total sample of 9 residents. R4 voiced concerns that she was forced to wear a nightgown because she had no clean clothes. As evidenced by: R4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include, in part: Chronic Kidney Disease, Type II Diabetes with Diabetic Neuropathy, Dehydration, Major Depressive Disorder, Generalized Anxiety Disorder, Muscle Wasting and Atrophy, Unsteadiness on feet, Weakness. R4's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) with a target date of 7/18/24, indicates, in part: Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) of 14, indicating cognitively intact. On 8/6/24 at 9:34 AM, Surveyor observed R4 sitting in a wheelchair in her room, dressed in a nightgown. R4 expressed concerns to Surveyor that she had no clean clothes, that they were all in the laundry. R4 stated that she stays in her room because it makes her…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-07-16 · tag F0837 — widespreadEstablish a governing body that is legally responsible for establishing and implementing policies for managing and operating the facility and appoints a properly licensed administrator responsible for managing the facility.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, and staff and vendor interview, the Bedrock Corporation governing body did not ensure adequate funds were made available to provide for the safe and efficient management of the facility. The failure to maintain current payment status with service providers and vendors has the potential to affect all 72 residents in the facility. The Bedrock Corporate governing body failed to maintain current payment status with several service providers and vendors that resulted in vendors refusing to provide further service until payment is received, the facility is delinquent in their property taxes and utilities, the governing body has not paid State bed tax or federal Civil Money Penalties (CMPs), the facility pharmacy provider was abruptly terminated after a past due notice was issued including potential of disruption of service. The failure of the Bedrock governing body to maintain current contract payments has resulted in loss of service and notice of disruption of service. Bedrock's corporation's failure to provide sufficient funding to maintain service/vendor…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-16 · tag F0554 — isolatedAllow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure that all residents are clinically appropriate to self-administer medications for 1 of 1 (R1) resident observed for self-administration of medications out of a total sample of 3 residents. R1 was observed to have medications at her bedside and had not been assessed to self-administer medications. Evidenced by: The facility policy entitled, Resident Self Administration of Medication, dated 3/1/23, states in part, Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines: 1. Each resident has the opportunity to self-administer medications during the routine assessment. 2. Resident's preference will be documented on the appropriate form and placed in the medical record. 3. When determining if self-administration is clinically appropriate for a resident, the interdisciplinary team should at a minimum consider the following: a. The medications appropriate and safer for self-administration . d. The resident's capability to follow directions . g. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-16 · tag F0555 — isolatedHonor the resident's right to choose his or her attending physician.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure 2 of 2 residents (R1 and R5) reviewed were able to choose their physician. R1 during an interview indicated that she has not been allowed to see her primary care physician and instead is only allowed to see the in-house physician and Nurse Practitioner (NP) R5 was not aware she is able to select her own physician instead of being followed by the Medical Director. Evidenced by: The facility's policy titled Resident Rights implemented 10/01/22, states in part: .Policy: The facility will inform the resident both orally and in writing in a language that the resident understands, of his or her rights and all rules and regulations governing resident conduct and responsibilities during the stay in the facility. Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines: 1. Prior to or upon admission, the social service designee, or another designated staff member, will inform the resident and/or the resident's representative of the resident's rights and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-16 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure adequate supervision to prevent accidents from occurring for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for accidents/supervision (R1). R1 was admitted following hospitalization for an intentional overdose with Potassium (Electrolyte that affects heart rhythm) and Amlodipine (Calcium-channel blocker, decreases blood pressure by widening blood vessels) and staff failed to maintain adequate supervision of the resident while R1 was in possession of these medications. Evidenced by: The facility policy entitled, Accidents and Supervision Policy, dated 3/1/23 states, in part: The resident environment will remain as free of accident hazards as is possible. Each resident will receive adequate supervision and assistive devices to prevent accidents. This includes: 1. Identifying hazard(s) and risk(s). 2. Evaluating and analyzing hazard(s) and risk(s). 3. Implementing interventions to reduce hazard(s) and risk(s) . 1. Identification of Hazards and Risks- the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-01 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure that each resident receives adequate supervision and assistance to prevent accidents. The facility was under a tornado warning and staff failed to follow the facility's policy and procedure to ensure resident safety for 4 or 4 residents (R1, R2, R3, and R4) interviewed. This has the potential to affect more than a limited number of residents residing in the home. R1, R2, R3, and R4 reported that facility staff did not move them into the hallway during a tornado warning. Evidenced by: The facility's policy Tornado dated 10/1/23, states in part, .7. Emergency procedures for tornado warning: a. Make announcement that the facility is under a tornado warning. b. Implement take cover procedures immediately. i. Relocate residents to designated safe areas. ii. Close doors. iii. Provide pillows and blankets to protect head/ body from debris. c. Staff take cover in designated safe areas. Perform emergency tasks only. d. Remain in safe areas until tornado…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-19 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse are reported immediately, but not later than 2 hours after the allegation is made, if the events that cause the allegation involve abuse or result in serious bodily injury, or not later than 24 hours if the events that cause the allegation do not involve abuse and do not result in serious bodily injury, to the administrator of the facility and to other officials for 1 of 4 sampled residents (R1) reviewed for abuse. R1 received a life-threatening letter from a facility Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA), the facility failed to report the incident to the State Agency (SA) This is evidenced by: The facility's policy titled Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation dated 10/1/22, states in part .Definitions: .Verbal Abuse means the use of oral, written, or gestured communication or sounds that willfully includes disparaging and derogatory terms to residents or their families, or within their hearing distance…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-04 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and medical record review, facility staff did not provide care and treatment in accordance with professional standards of practice for 1 of 3 sampled residents (R1). The facility was aware of R1's history of having a small bowel obstruction and did not thoroughly assess R1 when he presented with symptoms of nausea and vomiting, did not provide continued monitoring every shift by obtaining vitals and observing/monitoring for continued emesis and describing appearance and amount. The facility failed to monitor R1's condition every shift by obtaining vitals and observing/recording the appearance of R1's urine when they suspected he had a Urinary Tract Infection and while waiting for the Urine Analysis results. The facility failed to monitor R1's intake every shift and failed to notify R1's Medical Doctor of his low fluid intakes. Evidenced by: R1 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses: Paraplegia, Spinal Stenosis of lumbar region with neurogenic…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-23 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not report 1 of 4 incidents to the State Survey Agency timely. R4 reported that R2 came in to R4's room on 4/8/24 and R2 touched R4 on the buttock and pulled his pants down. R4 reported this to facility staff on 4/8/24. The facility failed to report non-consensual sexual touching to state agency timely as the facility reported to state agency on 4/10/24. Evidenced by: The facility policy, Abuse, Neglect, And Exploitation, dated 10/01/22, states, in part; .Sexual Abuse is non-consensual sexual contact of any type with a resident .1. Reporting of all alleged violations to the Administrator, state agency, adult protective services and to all other required agencies .within specified timeframes: a. Immediately, but not later than 2 hours after the allegation is made, if the events that cause the allegation involve abuse or result in serious bodily injury, or b. Not later than 24 hours if the events that cause the allegation do not involve abuse and do not result…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-23 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure each resident receives adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents for 1 of 3 residents reviewed (R1). R1 has known self-injurious behavior and the facility did not ensure measures were in place to protect him from further accidents and self-injurious behavior. Findings include R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and has diagnoses that include anxiety, depression and quadriplegia. R1's most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], shows a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14, indicating R1 is cognitively intact. R1 was discharged from a local hospital to the facility. His discharge diagnoses include Polysubstance abuse, history of cocaine abuse and marijuana use. R1's care plan states, Focus: .has been intoxicated from alcohol and cannabis during stay here .has tested positive for Fentanyl (Narcotic) and THC (Tetrahydrocannabinol/Marijuana) on a drug screen .Interventions: Attempt interventions before…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-03-04 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — patternEnsure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not provide behavioral health services to ensure the highest practicable mental and psychosocial well-being for 6 residents (R7, R5, R3, R4, R6, and R8) of 10 sampled residents. R7 admitted to the facility with a history of substance abuse. The facility failed to offer R7 services related to this diagnosis and failed to create a care plan with how staff will monitor R7's visitor from bringing medications and alcohol into the facility. R5 admitted to the facility with a history of alcohol dependency with intoxication and alcohol abuse. The facility failed to offer R5 services related to these diagnoses and failed to create and implement a care plan that includes what staff should monitor R5 for, a goal related to R5's alcohol use, and interventions related to R5's alcohol use. R5 was found to be in possession of alcohol on multiple occasion, noted to have alcohol odor on his breath, and eventually received his 4th OWI (Operating While Intoxicated) ticket…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-04 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure the accurate and safe administration of medication for 1 resident (R5) of 10 sampled residents. The facility did not ensure R5's medications were given per Physician orders as he left the facility without his medications. The facility did not update R5's Medical Doctor (MD) when his medications were omitted. The facility did not hold all R5's medications and consult with R5's MD when he was found to have alcohol odor on his breath. Evidenced by: Facility policy, entitled Medication Administration, implemented 3/1/20, includes, in part: medications are administered by licensed nurses, or other staff who are legally authorized to do so in this state, as ordered by the physician and in accordance with professional standards of practice . Facility policy, entitles Medication Errors, undated, includes: The facility shall ensure medications will be administered as follows: according to physician orders . per manufacturer's specifications regarding the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-19 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — patternEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate of 5% or less. LPN H and LPN I (Licensed Practical Nurse) were late administering medications to R19, R20, R21, R1, and R22. This resulted in 29 errors out of 34 opportunities which calculates to an 85.2% error rate. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Medication Administration, dated 03/01/19, showed: Policy: Medications are administered by licensed nurses, or other staff who are legally authorized to do so in this state, as ordered by the physician and in accordance with professional standards of practice, in a manner to prevent contamination or infection. Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines: . b. Administer within 60 minutes prior to or after scheduled time unless otherwise ordered by physician . 1. During a medication administration observation on 01/17/24 at 9:34 AM, LPN H provided R19's medications of vitamin D, bupropion (antidepressant), memantine (NMDA receptor antagonist), glimepiride (antidiabetic), Miralax (osmotic laxative), Trajenta…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-19 · tag F0623 — isolatedProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure 2 of 2 residents (R16 and R17) and/or their representatives reviewed for facility initiated emergent hospital transfer, from a total sample of 33 residents, were provided with written transfer/discharge notice that included the reason for transfer, the place of transfer, and other information regarding the transfer. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Transfer and Discharge (Including AMA [Against Medical Advice]), dated 10/01/22, showed: Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines: . 4. The facility's transfer/discharge notice will be provided to the resident and the resident's representative in a language and manner in which they can understand. The notice will include all of the following at the time it is provided: a. The specific reason and basis for transfer or discharge. b. The effective date of transfer or discharge. c. The specific location (such as the name of the new provider or description and/or address if the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-19 · tag F0625 — isolatedNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure 2 of 2 residents (R16 and R17) and/or their Resident Representative (RR) received written notification of the facility's bed-hold policy. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Bed Hold Notice Upon Transfer, implemented 03/01/19, showed: Policy: At the time of transfer for hospitalization or therapeutic leave, the facility will provide to the resident and/or the resident representative written notice which specifies the duration of the bed-hold policy and addresses information explaining the return of the resident to the next available bed . Bed Hold Notice Upon Transfer 1. Before a resident is transferred to the hospital or goes on therapeutic leave, the facility will provide to the resident and/or the resident representative written information that specifies: a. The duration of the state bed-hold policy, if any, during which the resident is permitted to return and resume residence in the nursing facility; b. The reserve bed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2023-08-02 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview and record review, the facility did not ensure food was stored and prepared in a sanitary manner. This practice had the potential to affect all 62 residents residing in the facility. Dietary Manager (DM)-G did not wear a hairnet that fully covered DM-G's hair. The kitchen and food preparation areas were unclean. The facility did not ensure warewasher (dishwasher) surface temperatures reached an appropriate temperature to ensure sanitization. The facility did not have a practice to monitor and document cooling temperatures. Cook (CK)-H and CK-I did not obtain temperatures of microwave reheated food to ensure the food was heated evenly. Findings include: On 8/1/23, DM-G verified the facility followed the FDA (Food and Drug Administration) Food Code as their standard of practice. Hairnet: The FDA Food Code 2022 documents at 2-402.11 Food Employees shall wear hair restraints such as hats, hair coverings or nets, beard restraints, and clothing that covers body hair, that are designed and worn to effectively to keep their hair from contacting exposed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-02 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, and staff and resident interview, the facility did not ensure dignity was maintained for 1 Resident (R) (R57) of 2 residents reviewed for indwelling urinary catheters. During multiple observations, R57's catheter drainage bag was uncovered and visible to others. Findings include: On 8/1/23, Surveyor reviewed R57's medical record. R57 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included heart failure, muscle weakness, and reduced mobility. R57's most recent MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment indicated R57 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 11 out of 15 which indicated R57 had moderate cognitive impairment. R57 required up to extensive assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs). On 7/31/23 at 11:35 AM, Surveyor observed R57 in a common area in a wheelchair. Surveyor noted R57's uncovered catheter drainage bag contained urine, was anchored below the wheelchair, and was visible to others. Another resident was in the same common area sitting across from…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-02 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, and resident and staff interview, the facility did not ensure a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment for 1 Resident (R) (R57) of 3 residents reviewed. On 7/31/23 at 11:35 AM, Surveyor observed R57 in a common area in a wheelchair. Surveyor noted R57's wheelchair had hardened white matter on the front left seat and a hole in the right armrest that measured 1 x 1 cm (centimeter). The seat cushion, metal bars and plastic parts of the wheelchair were soiled with dried hard matter. The left armrest was cracked and peeling. The right outer metal part of the side of the wheelchair contained brownish dried matter. R57 stated, I think this chair is a hundred years old and It really needs a good cleaning. R57 indicated R57 was unsure if the wheelchair was cleaned on a regular basis and indicated the wheelchair was in the current condition for a while. On 8/1/23 at 10:05 AM, Surveyor observed R57's wheelchair in the same condition. On 8/1/23 at 10:16 AM, Surveyor interviewed Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN)-C who indicated resident equipment is cleaned weekly…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-02 · tag F0694 — isolatedProvide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff and resident interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure 1 Resident (R) (R72) of 2 residents who received medication through a peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) was monitored or assessed for complications. R72 was admitted to the facility with a PICC line (a soft, thin flexible tube inserted in a vein used to administer IV (intravenous) medication and fluid). R72's PICC line was not monitored or flushed for 25 days. Findings include: The facility's Central Line Care policy, dated 10/1/19, indicated: Policy: It is the policy of this facility to ensure that central venous access catheters are flushed, locked and removed consistent with current standards of practice .Central venous access devices or catheters that are placed into the central circulation with the tip located in the superior vena cava or the inferior vena cava depending upon location. These are commonly known as central lines. These devices may be used for longer durations of time but are not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-02 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and record review, the facility did not ensure 2 Residents (R) (R46 and R77) of 5 sampled residents prescribed high-risk medications had a plan of care that addressed use of the medications and contained interventions to monitor for possible adverse reactions. R46 was prescribed antihistamine medication for anxiety and opioid (narcotic pain relief) medication for pain. The facility did not develop a plan of care that addressed the use of both medications and contained interventions to monitor for adverse reactions to the high risk medications. R77 was prescribed opioid medication for pain. The facility did not develop a plan of care that addressed the use of opioid medication and contained interventions to monitor for adverse reactions to the high risk medication. Findings include: 1. On 8/2/23, Surveyor reviewed R46's medical record. R46 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE]. R46 had diagnoses that included major depressive disorder, anxiety, insomnia, asthma, and cellulitis (a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-02 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and record review, the facility did not offer or administer Pneumococcal vaccines for 3 Residents (R) (R45, R53, and R57) of 5 residents reviewed for immunizations. R45 received the Pneumococcal 23 vaccine on 7/18/16. R45 was not offered or administered the Pneumococcal 15 or Pneumococcal 20 vaccine. R53 received the Pneumococcal 13 vaccine on 4/8/15 and the Pneumococcal 23 vaccine after the age of 65 on 11/16/17. A discussion with R53, R53's provider and the facility did not occur regarding R53's eligibility to receive the Pneumococcal 20 vaccine. R57 received the Pneumococcal 13 vaccine on 10/14/15 and the Pneumococcal 23 vaccine after the age of 65 on 5/2/18. A discussion with R57, R57's provider and the facility did not occur regarding R57's eligibility to receive the Pneumococcal 20 vaccine. Findings include: The facility's Pneumococcal Vaccine (Series) policy, dated 3/1/19, contained the following information: It is our policy to offer our residents, staff, and volunteer workers…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-07-13 · tag F0623 — isolatedProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interview and record review, the facility did not ensure a written notificatoin of transfer was provided to a Resident (R) transferred to the hospital for care for 2 (R2 and R49) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for hospitalizations. Additionally, the facility did not notify the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman of hospital transfers for R2. The facility did not provide R2 and/or R2's resident representative and the Ombudsman with a written transfer notice when R2 was transfered to the hospital on 5/10/22. The Facility did not provide R49 and/or R49's resident representative with a written transfer notice when R49 was transfered to the hospital on 5/19/22 Findings include: 1. From 7/11/22 through 7/13/22, Surveyor reviewed R2's medical record which documented the facility transfered R2 to the hospital on 5/10/22. Surveyor noted R2's record did not contain a written transfer notice. On 7/12/22 at 1:22 PM, Surveyor interviewed Nursing Home Administrator (NHA)-A who verified the facility did not provide a written notification of transfer to residents and/or resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-07-13 · tag F0685 — isolatedAssist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on resident and staff interviews and record review, the facility did not provide proper assistance in maintaining hearing ability for 1 Resident (R) (R7) reviewed for assistive hearing devices. Surveyor noted during initial tour that R7 was very hard of hearing and required talking very loudly and close to residents ear. R7 had a history of hearing impairment for which the facility did not address by thorough assessment and intervention. Findings include: The Facility's admission agreement indicated, 1. Definitions. For the purposes this Agreement the following terms are defined and incorporated: 2. Care and Services .Consent. Resident consents to admission to and treatment by our Facility and health care providers .Ancillary .In accordance with the Resident's plan of care, the facility will arrange for ancillary services which may include rehabilitation, podiatry, ophthalmology, audiology, dental, laboratory and diagnostic, hospice and pharmacy services. The Resident agrees to the conducting of diagnostic tests for the provision of ancillary services as ordered by the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-07-13 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and record review, the facility did not ensure that residents were free from unnecessary antipsychotic medications by monitoring for adverse reactions for 1 Resident (R) (R39) of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. R39 was prescribed Risperidone (also know as Risperdal, an antipsychotic medication). The facility did not complete a TD (Tardive Dyskinesia) assessment to monitor for side effects of the medication. Findings include: The National Alliance on Mental Illness (NAMI) documented in a web-based article dated 2022, Tardive dyskinesia (TD) is a movement disorder that causes a range of repetitive muscle movements in the face, neck, arms and legs. TD symptoms are beyond a person ' s control. These symptoms can make routine physical functioning difficult, significantly affecting quality of life .TD primarily occurs as a side effect of long-term use of certain medications. It can become a permanent condition even after a person stops taking the medication .TD symptoms…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$278,229 in federal fines across 5 penalties. 2 Medicare payment denials on record.
- $176,721 — penalty dated 2024-10-17
- $15,939 — penalty dated 2024-06-04
- $40,072 — penalty dated 2024-06-04
- $8,989 — penalty dated 2024-03-04
- $36,508 — penalty dated 2024-01-19
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-11-15 for 43 days
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-08-09 for 60 days
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to BEDROCK HEALTHCARE — 9 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1 of 5 | 1.4 | -0.4 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 1 of 5 | 1.3 | -0.3 vs chain |
| Staffing | 1 of 5 | 2.1 | -1.1 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 3 of 5 | 2.7 | +0.3 vs chain |
The other 8 homes this chain runs (chain average 1.4★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CHOPP, MARTIN | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | 20% | since 10/01/2019 |
| CHOPP, PNINA | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | 60% | since 10/01/2019 |
| CHOPP, SOLOMON | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | 20% | since 10/01/2019 |
| OPAL HEALTHCARE WI LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/27/2025 |
| FRESON, RAYMOND | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 12/24/2024 |
| RAMANUJAM, SANDEEP | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 02/01/2024 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 12 rows in the source record cover these 6 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $649K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in WI
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Wisconsin Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 525333. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2024-11-14, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.