Broward Nursing & Rehabilitation Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

57.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 89 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 22.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 94 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.27 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 41% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 20% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 198 beds and averages 152.2 residents a day — about 77% occupied, or roughly 46 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.60 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.99 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.80 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.05 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.82 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.11 to 0.67 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 24% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

15 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 5 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-13 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
  Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to identify significant weight loss and provide nutritional interventions in a timely manner for 2 of 6 residents reviewed for nutrition (Resident #12 and Resident #13). The findings included: A review of the facility's policy titled Weight Assessment/Evaluation and Intervention, revised on 11/2021, revealed that Weights will be recorded in the individual's medical record. Any weight change of 5% or more since the last available weight will be retaken for confirmation. If the weight is verified, the nurse will notify the Dietitian. The threshold for significant unplanned and undesired weight loss/gain will be based on the following criteria: One month, 5% of weight loss is significant, and greater than 5% is severe. 3 months-7.5% weight loss is significant, and greater than 7.5% is severe. 6 months- 10% weight loss is significant, and greater than 10% is severe. 1.) A record review showed that Resident #12 was readmitted on [DATE] with…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-13 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observations, interviews and the facility's policy review, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 1 sampled resident reviewed for oxygen use, received oxygen therapy as per physician order (Resident #37). The findings included: Review of the facility's policy titled Oxygen Concentrator revised on August 2024 documented .oxygen should be administered only under orders of the attending physician . Review of Resident #37's clinical record documented an admission on [DATE] with a readmission on [DATE]. The resident diagnoses included Essential Hypertension, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus with Diabetic Neuropathy, Anemia, and End Stage Parkinson's Disease. Review of Resident #37's Minimum Data Set (MDS) quarterly assessment dated [DATE] documented a Brief Interview of the Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12 indicating that the resident had moderate cognition. The assessment, documented under Functional Abilities and Goals the resident was dependent on the staff to complete all activities of daily living…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-02-13 · tag F0801 — isolated
  Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews the facility failed to ensure a Registered Dietitian provided and documented oversight of assessments and recommendations performed by a Dietetic Technician, Registered (DTR) for 2 of 31 sampled residents (Residents #58 and #12). The findings included: Review of the Service Agreement - RDN/LDN/NDTR (Registered Dietitian Nutritionist/Licensed Dietitian Nutritionist/Nutrition and Dietetics Technician, Registered) dated 08/06/24 between the facility and contracted company included in part the following: Services: Contracted company will provide RDN/LDN/NDTR to facility for the execution of ongoing clinical nutrition management services using systems and processes directed by the facility. Contracted company will perform these services in accordance with currently accepted professional standards and all applicable federal, state and local lows and administrative regulations. Review of the Job Description for the Consultant Dietetic Technician (Provided by the contracted company)…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-10-26 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to follow policy for appropriate response time for a full code resident experiencing cardiac arrest for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for code status (Resident #137). The findings included: Review of the facility policy titled Medical Emergency Response, dated 03/2023, revealed the following: The employee who first witnesses or is first on the site of a medical emergency, that are trained, will initiate immediate action, including cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). If the resident experiences cardiac arrest, the facility must provide basic life support, including CPR. Resident #137 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #137 had a medical history significant for Cellulitis, Difficulty Swallowing, Weakness, Psychosis, Depression, Seizures, Dementia, Altered Mental Status, and Atrial Fibrillation. During the initial tour of the facility conducted on 10/23/23 at 10:18 AM, the surveyor entered Resident #137's room after knocking on the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-10-26 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
  Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to follow tube feeding orders for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for tube feedings (Resident #127). The findings included: The facility policy titled Care and Treatment of Feeding Tubes, revised on 09/28/23, revealed the following: feeding tubes will be utilized according to physician's orders, which typically include the kind of feeding and its caloric value, volume, duration, mechanism of administration and frequency of flushes. Resident #127 was readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of sepsis, dysphagia, and iron deficiency anemia. Order dated 07/25/23 revealed enteral feeding with Jevity 1.5 (tube feeding formulary) at 55 milliliters (ml) an hour for 23 hours, providing 1898 calories every 24 hours. It further showed that Resident #127 needed tube feeding related to failure to thrive. In an observation conducted on 10/23/23 at 10:55 AM, The tube feeding was noted with Jevity 1.5 at 55 ml an hour, which started at 12:30 AM that morning. Closer…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-10-26 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
  Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to follow physician orders for 1 of 6 residents reviewed for unnecessary medication review (Resident #395). The findings included: Review of the facility policy titled Medication Orders, dated 05/2022 revealed the Elements of the Medication Order must include the quantity or duration (length) of therapy. Resident #395 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. She was discharged from the facility on 08/05/23. Resident #395 had a medical history significant for Falls, Right Hip Injury, Cardiac Pacemaker, Weakness, and Anemia. A Care Plan was written on 08/07/23 which stated [Resident #395] is on anticoagulant therapy Lovenox with the goal of the resident will be free from discomfort or adverse reactions related to anticoagulant use through the review date of 07/19/23. Review of the paper chart revealed a handwritten order written on 07/07/23 from the physician's nurse practitioner which stated Lovenox 40mg subQ (subcutaneously) Qdaily (one time daily) x…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-10-26 · tag F0810 — isolated
  Provide special eating equipment and utensils for residents who need them and appropriate assistance.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to provide adaptive devices to assist with eating for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for nutrition (Resident #38). The findings included: A review of the facility's policy titled Adaptive Feeding Equipment dated 02/3/2023 showed the following: the dietary department should be notified of residents needing adaptive equipment. The adaptive equipment is stored and maintained in the dietary department, and appropriate utensils should be placed on the resident's food tray at each meal. Resident #38 was readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of Glaucoma, Diabetes and Renal Disease. Order noted on 09/27/23 for adaptive equipment scoop plate with meals to enhance feeding due to poor eyesight. Occupational Therapy screening dated 09/28/23 showed that Resident #38 will benefit from a scoop plate to prevent food spillage due to impaired vision. In an observation conducted on 10/24/23 at 12:34 PM, Resident #38 was in the 2nd-floor dining room eating his…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-10-26 · tag F0813 — isolated
  Have a policy regarding use and storage of foods brought to residents by family and other visitors.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to follow its own policy regarding food brought from home for 1 of 5 sampled residents reviewed for nutrition (Resident #87). The findings included: A review of the policy titled Food Brought by Family/Visitors/Residents undated showed that staff must be aware of and approve food brought to the residents by family and visitors. The Dietitian or a Nurse Supervisor should ensure that the food is not in conflict with the resident's prescribed diet plan. The Dietitian will counsel residents or families about requests conflicting with resident dietary restrictions and whenever diets cannot be liberalized. Record review revealed that Resident #87 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of unspecific dementia, adult failure to thrive, and dysphagia. A review of active orders showed an order for enteral feeding with Glucerna 1.5 (tube feeding formulary) running at 55 milliliters an hour for 20 hours dated 07/06/23. Pleasure food diet with soft…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2022-06-30 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, observations, and record review, the facility failed to provide bathing/grooming for (Resident #419 and #418), and was unable to provide assistance during dining for (Resident #216) 3 of 28 sampled residents for activities of daily livings (ADLs). The findings included: Review of the facility's policy titled Activities of Daily Living dated 01/2021 showed assistance would be based on the resident's comprehensive assessment and consistent with the resident's needs and choices to ensure that the resident's abilities in ADLs do not deteriorate. Care and services will be provided in the following area: bathing, dressing, grooming, and eating, including meals and snacks. 1). In an interview conducted with Resident #418 on 06/27/22 at 10:03 AM, she stated that she has been asking for staff to give her and Resident #419 (her husband) a shower, but it was not given. She further stated that the facility did not give her a choice of when to get her showers. She was told that her showers would be from…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2022-06-30 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure residents will remain free from falls for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for falls (Residents #58 and #59). The findings included: Review of the facility's policy, titled Fall Prevention Program, date revised 01/2022, revealed the following: Definition of a fall is an event in which an individual unintentionally comes to rest on the ground, floor, or other level, but not as a result of an overwhelming external force. The event may be witnessed, reported, or presumed when a resident is found on the floor or ground, and can occur anywhere. When any resident experiences a fall, the facility will: Assess the resident, complete a post fall assessment, complete an incident report, notify the physician and family, review the resident's care plan and update as indicated, document all assessments and actions, obtain witness statements in the case of injury. 1) During the initial tour of the facility, the surveyor knocked on Resident #58's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to MILLENNIUM HEALTH SYSTEMS — 4 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 20 rows in the source record cover these 10 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

6 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 72% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $2.1M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 13% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in FL