No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Springtree Rehabilitation & Health Care Center

4251 Springtree Drive, Sunrise, FL 33351 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 110 certified beds · (954) 572-4251 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (954) 572-4251 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
No harm-level citations or fines — but 13 lower-level deficiencies on record (see below)
Insights

This home’s record is mixed — some reassuring signs, some worth asking about.

In its favor
  • a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
  • no harm-level citations in the current inspection record
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (5/5)
  • lower-than-typical staff turnover (13% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
Worth asking about
  • its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
  • about 17% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies
  • its last standard health inspection was over 2 years ago — the star rating may not reflect current conditions

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

5/5
CMS overall
5 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 3 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 5 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★ 2/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
8395 W Oakland Park Blvd Ste E · (954) 803-9002 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
4529 N Pine Island Rd · (888) 389-2014 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
4119 N Pine Island Rd · (954) 533-6692 · Call to confirm hours
Park
4550 NW 82nd Ave · (954) 572-1471 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
8706 NW 44th St

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 3 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 4 to 5 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating5★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased10.5%8.7%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight9.6%5.5%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.3%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection1.3%0.7%2.0%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms0.8%4.6%6.5%better
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury3.3%2.5%3.3%typical
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened15.3%9.5%16.1%typical
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication11.0%14.4%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%99.2%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers4.2%4.5%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control23.5%10.5%21.2%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table4.2%8.6%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.6%1.5%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine97.5%94.7%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission32.2%26.1%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit3.3%9.1%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.382.131.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days0.901.151.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

56.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 118 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

56.7%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
11.5%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
26.1%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.45U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.26hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.17hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.02hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 26.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 65 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.45 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 75% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 27% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF56.7%CMS range 49.4–64.451.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF11.5%CMS range 8.4–17.410.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge26.1%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge27.7%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge16.9%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified81.5%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting96.8%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay3.3%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened3.3%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization5.9%CMS range 3.2–11.27.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.871.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.62
RN hours/ resident / day
0.97
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.74
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.33
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.43
RN hoursweekends
13.3%
Total nursing turnover
29.4%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 110 beds and averages 104.9 residents a day — about 95% occupied, or roughly 5 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.33 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.62 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.74 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.91 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.51 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.70 to 0.43 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 13% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

7
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2024-05-23)
3
at the previous standard inspection (2023-06-08)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

13 citations, most serious first — scroll within the box to see all.

  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-23 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to provide housekeeping and maintenance services necessary to maintain a sanitary orderly, and comfortable interior for Unit 1, for 7 of 7 observed resident rooms and the community shower, and Unit 2, for 1 of 1 observed resident rooms. The findings included: During the resident screenings performed by the surveyors on 05/20-21/24 and the Environment observation tour conducted on 05/22/24 at 1:00 PM, accompanied with the Administrator and Corporate Director of Procurement, the following findings were noted: 1. Unit 1: room [ROOM NUMBER]: A - The overbed light cord was too short (cord extension missing), the bathroom door frame & walls were scuffed and in disrepair, and the privacy curtain stained. room [ROOM NUMBER]: The call bell cord was too short; and bathroom ceiling vent-dust laden. room [ROOM NUMBER]: The room walls were in disrepair with scuff marks, the privacy curtain was stained, and the bathroom toilet was running continuously. room [ROOM…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-23 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and served food in accordance with professional standards for food services safety. The findings included: 1. During the initial observation tour conducted of the Main Kitchen on 05/20/24 at 9:00 AM and accompanied with the facility cook supervisor (Staff G), the following were noted: (a) A soiled rag was located on the clean food preparation counter next to the commercial toaster. The surveyor informed Staff G that all cleaning cloths must be stored within a chemical sanitizing solution when not in use. (b) The floor area located in front of the commercial toaster and food preparation counter was noted to have numerous missing tiles and holes (3). (c) The ceiling vent located outside of the paper / disposable room was noted to be soiled and dust laden. (d) Observation of the paper / disposable room noted to have freezer jackets that were hanging on shelving and coming into contact with paper / disposable goods. The surveyor informed Staff G that the jackets are soiled and sweaty and are…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-05-23 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to implement Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) per Centers for Disease Control (CDC) guidelines and facility policies and procedures for 10 of 10 sampled residents reviewed for Transmission-based precautions, Residents #18, #20, #33, #60, #77, #85, #92, #327, #334, and #371. The census at the time of survey was 108 residents. The findings included: Review of the Center for Disease Control (CDC) guidance for Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP), documented, in part, the following: When implementing Contact Precautions or Enhanced Barrier Precautions, it is critical to ensure that staff have awareness of the facility's expectations about hand hygiene and gown/glove use, initial and refresher training, and access to appropriate supplies. To accomplish this: o Make PPE [Personal Protective Equipment], including gowns and gloves, available immediately outside of the resident room. The guidance for the Enhanced Barrier Precautions is located at:…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-23 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and observation, the facility failed to address a urine culture and sensitivity result in a timely manner for 1 of 2 sampled residents reviewed for hospitalizations (Resident #103); and failed to maintain a secure catheter tubing for 1 of 1 sampled resident reviewed for urinary catheters (Resident #92). The findings included: Review of the facility's policy, titled, Laboratory Services and Reporting, dated 2/2023 and revised 2/2024, documented, in part: The facility must provide or obtain laboratory services to meet the needs of its residents. The facility is responsible for the timeliness of the services. Promptly notify the ordering physician, physician assistant, nurse practitioner, or clinical nurse specialist of laboratory results that fall outside the clinical reference range. 1. Record review documented Resident #103 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the comprehensive assessment dated [DATE] documented the resident was cognitively intact and required…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-23 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to administer pain medicine as ordered for 1 of 4 sampled residents reviewed for pain (Resident #85). The findings included: Record review revealed Resident #85 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the comprehensive assessment dated [DATE] documented the resident was cognitively intact and required partial / moderate assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs). Record review documented Resident #85 was care planned for pain and had interventions in place to assess and document pain and monitor effectiveness of interventions. An interview was conducted with Resident #85 on 05/21/24 at 12:00 PM. The resident stated he was only getting Tylenol for pain, and it was not effective. Record review revealed an order of 05/03/24 for Oxycodone 5 milligrams (mg) every 4 hours as needed for acute pain on a scale of 5-10 out of 10. Further review of the resident's orders revealed an order for Extra Strength Tylenol 500 mg every 6 hours…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-23 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of policy and procedure, observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure it secured and locked two (2) over-the-counter (OTC) medications and one (1) prescription medication for 3 of 3 sampled residents observed, Resident #63, Resident #79 and Resident #73; and failed to promptly discard one (1) expired OTC medication and one (1) prescription medication for 2 of 3 sampled residents, Resident #63 and Resident #79. The findings included: Review of the facility policy and procedure on 05/23/24 at 11:23 AM, titled, Storage of Medications, provided by the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON), reviewed May 2022, documented, in part, in the Policy Statement: Medications and biologicals are stored safely, securely, and properly, following manufacturer's recommendations or those of the supplier. The medication supply is accessible only to licensed nursing personnel, pharmacy personnel, or staff members lawfully authorized to administer medications .Procedures: .B. Only licensed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-23 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to prepare food in a pureed form designed to meet the needs of 2 of 4 sampled residents of 7 residents with physician ordered pureed diets, Residents #40 and #58, and that included sampled residents, Residents #20, and #373, who were on pureed diets. The census at the time of survey was 108 residents. The findings included: During the review of the facility's Level 4 Pureed Diet, the following were noted: a. Grains - Recommend Pureed soft-cooked hot cereals smooth with no lumps. Served without excess liquid. Do not serve any cooked cereal that is not pureed and has no lumps. b. Pasta - Recommend Pureed moist pasta without lumps. Liquids / sauces do not separate from food. Do not serve and cooked pasta that is not pureed and has no lumps. 1. During the observation of the lunch meal in the main dining room on 05/20/24 at 12:30 PM, it was noted that Resident #40 was served a Pureed Diet. Further observation noted that the pureed Spaghetti was not smooth in texture and there were visible lumps. At the request of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-06-08 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide housekeeping and maintenance services necessary to maintain a sanitary, orderly, and comfortable interior that included 2 of 2 residential areas (Unit 1 and Unit 2) and the facility's laundry department. The findings included: 1. During the initial resident screening conducted on 06/05/23 and the Environment Tour conducted on 06/07/23 at 12:30 PM, accompanied with the facility's Assistant Administrator, and corporate Housekeeping Director, the following were noted the following: (a.) 100 Unit: room [ROOM NUMBER]: The room walls were noted to be damaged and in disrepair and required repainting, an approximate 2 feet of floor damage next to the A-bed, and the exterior of the bathroom entry door was damaged and in a state of disrepair. room [ROOM NUMBER]: The room walls were noted to be damaged and in disrepair, and the exterior of the bathroom entry door was damaged and was in a state of disrepair. room [ROOM NUMBER]: The room walls…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-06-08 · tag F0687 — failed to care for feet properly — isolated
    Provide appropriate foot care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to provide foot care to 4 of 4 sampled residents reviewed for foot care, Residents #7, #28, #54, and #65. The findings included: Review of the facility's policy, titled, Skin Integrity- Foot Care, implemented on 01/2023, documented, in part, .comprehensive assessment will include an assessment of the feet for disorders which may require treatment .nail disorders. Nursing assistants will inspect skin during bath and will report any concerns to the resident's nurse immediately after the task .the attending physician will assume responsibility for the overall care and treatment of the resident's medical conditions . 1. Review of Resident #7's, clinical record documented an admission to the facility on [DATE] with no readmissions documented. The resident's diagnoses included Ataxic (awkward, uncoordinated walking) Gait, Unspecified Mood, Anxiety Disorder and Hereditary and Idiopathic Neuropathy (an illness where sensory and motor nerves of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-08 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications were not stored at residents' bedsides for 4 sampled residents, Residents #240, 44, 45, 255; failed to ensure proper medication disposal; failed to maintain medication carts in proper order for 1 of 3 medication carts reviewed for medication storage; and failed to ensure expired medications were properly disposed of in 1 of 1 treatment carts reviewed for medication storage. The findings included: Review of the facility policy, titled, Medication Storage in the Facility, last revised January 2018 revealed the following, in part: Medications and biologicals are stored safely, securely, and properly following manufacturers recommendations. The medication supply is accessible only to licensed nursing personnel, pharmacy personnel, or staff members lawfully authorized to administer medications. Outdated medications are immediately removed from inventory, disposed of according to procedures for medication disposal, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-02-10 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety that included; failure to hold hot foods at regulatory temperatures at 135 degrees or greater. This potentially effected 28 facility residents that included sampled Residents #5, #7, #38, #59. and #184. The findings included; During the second Kitchen/Food service observation tour conducted on 02/08/22 at 9:30 AM, it noted that numerous containers of foods were noted to be located on a utility cart near the oven area. Further observation noted that the pans contained : Ground Cooked Beef - 10 portions prepared on 02/07/22. Pureed Chicken - 10 Portions prepared on 02/07/22. Baked Fish - 6 portions prepared on 02/07/22. Baked Potatoes - 8 portions prepared on 02/07/22. At the request of the surveyor the temperatures of these foods were taken by the Corporate Food Service Manager with the use of the facility's calibrated digital thermometer and were recorded as follows; Ground Cooked…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-02-10 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — pattern
    Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to dispose of garbage and refuse in a safe and sanitary manor. The findings included: During the observation of the dumpster/refuse area accompanied with the Corporate Food Service Manager on 02/08/22 at 9:30 AM, the following were noted: 1) Upon exit of the rear door of the facility in route to the dumpster area, it was noted that there was an open trash barrel next to the exit door. Further observation noted that the open barrel was full of staff discarded Personal Protection Equipment (PPE) that included masks, gloves, and gowns. The Corporate Director stated that it was not the facility's procedure for disposing of infectious PPE's. The surveyor requested that the barrel contents be safely discarded as soon as possible and educate staff on proper disposal of PPE's. 2) Observation of the dumpster noted that 1 of 2 garbage dumpsters was noted to have a large hole in the bottom right corner. It was also noted that a rag had been placed in the hole. It was discussed with the Corporate Director that the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-02-10 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and review of policy and procedure, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that it secured medications for Resident #37, during a Medication Pass Observation and properly disposed of over-the-counter (OTC) medication for Resident #13, during an observational room tour. The findings included: 1) On 02/07/22 at 9:50 AM during a Medication Administration Observation, it was noted that there were three (3) unidentified, loose pills---one (1) orange and two (2) pink on Resident #37's floor, one (1) near the doorway and two (2), near her bedside table, unsecured and accessible to other residents, staff and visitors. Resident #37 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Dementia, Osteoarthritis, Major Depressive Disorders and History of Falling. She had a Brief Interview Mental Status (BIM) score of 6 (severely impaired). Photographic evidence obtained of the three (3) loose, unidentified pills located on the floor in Resident #37's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to MILLENNIUM HEALTH SYSTEMS — 4 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 5 of 54.3+0.7 vs chain
Health inspection 3 of 53.0≈ chain avg
Staffing 5 of 54.3+0.7 vs chain
Quality measures 5 of 54.5+0.5 vs chain
The other 3 homes this chain runs (chain average 4.3★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
2012 LIPSCHUTZ FAMILY TRUSTOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST9%since 05/23/2012
BARRY M KANTROWITZ REVOCABLE TRUST DATED 12/17/2009Organization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST5%since 01/01/2010
MILLENNIUM CONSOLIDATED, LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF69%since 11/15/2019
NONMARITAL TRUST UNDER THE HOWARD LIPSCHUTZ REVOCABLE TRUST 5/21/15Organization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF9%since 06/01/2021
PATRICIA ANN KROGER REVOCABLE TRUST DATED 2/21/25OrganizationDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/11/2025
WEISMAN, ANDREWIndividualDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/14/2000
BARTON D WEISMAN TRUST FBO ANDREW WEISMANOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF35%since 11/15/2019
BARTON D WEISMAN TRUST FBO MARCIA LANGLEYOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF35%since 11/15/2019
WEISMAN, ALEXANDERIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2024
HBA HEALTH SYSTEM LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 06/14/2000
DOUGLAS, ESTELLEIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/06/1998
GOLDMINTZ, KIMIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 11/21/2018
MILLENNIUM HEALTH SYSTEMS, LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 06/01/2005

CMS files one row per role, so the 23 rows in the source record cover these 13 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

9 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$11.6M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-2.9%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$2.1M
Related-party expense17% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 46%Medicare 5%Other / private 49%

This home reported $2.1M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 17% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$336per resident / day
operating cost
$10,200per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$326per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in FL

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Florida Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Florida
$10,342/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$12,167/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,610/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 105686. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2024-05-23, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next