Voorhees Pediatric Facility

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.90 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 96% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 0% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 122 beds and averages 108.1 residents a day — about 89% occupied, or roughly 14 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 6.36 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 2.14 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 0.91 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 5.72 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 6.62 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 2.30 to 1.76 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 26% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

27 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 16 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2025-10-21 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Complaint: 2642805Based on interviews, review of the medical records, and review of other pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to protect a severely cognitively impaired resident (Resident #1) from harm when a the Certified Nursing Aide yelled at and hit Resident #1, who was visibly upset after the encounter.This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for abuse.The evidence was as follows:A review of the facility's policy titled Safety: Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation updated 5/21/25, included Policy: [name redacted] has an obligation to protect the welfare of its residents and to fully investigate and correct any circumstances bearing upon that welfare. The approach should be as proactive as possible. As such, all new employees shall be in-serviced about abuse and neglect as part of orientation, and all current employees shall review this information at least annually thereafter [.] VI. Protection of the Resident: The facility will make efforts to ensure all residents are protected from physical and psychosocial harm, as…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-30 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interviews, medical records and review of other pertinent facility documentation on 1/30/26, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure clinical records were complete and accurately documented. This failure had the potential to affect the facility's ability to monitor the resident's nutritional status. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for resident records (Resident #2), and was evidenced by the following:According to the admission Record (AR) face sheet, Resident #2 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses which included but were not limited to acute and chronic respiratory failure, unspecified whether with hypoxia or hypercapnia (a clinical condition where a patient with a pre-existing, long-term (chronic) respiratory impairment experiences a new, sudden (acute) worsening of their ability to exchange oxygen and carbon dioxide. This diagnosis, often referred to as acute on chronic respiratory failure, is used when documentation confirms both conditions coexist, but the specific type of blood gas abnormality-low oxygen…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-05-23 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespread
  Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, record review and review of pertinent documents it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that there was sufficient competent staff to ensure a) all residents were provided with appropriate and timely incontinence care and were consistently available to provide appropriate care to maintain residents highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being and b) the minimum staffing requirements per the New Jersey Department of Health based on acuity of the residents was maintained. The deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents who resided in the facility and was evidenced by the following: Refer to 677F, 688D A. On 05/18/25 at 7:17 PM, the Registered Nurse Nursing Supervisor for the B -Wing Unit, informed the survey team the B- Wing Unit had 60 residents. When the surveyor asked how many Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) were assigned to the unit, a CNA at the nursing station stated she was the only CNA on the unit and she was assigned ten residents. The CNA explained that the nurses were responsible for providing…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-05-23 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and document review it was determined that the facility failed to a) ensure the formula preparation process and nourishment area was implemented in a clean and sanitary manner, b) food items were labeled with a use by date, and c) appropriate cleaning items were utilized to prevent potential contamination. The deficient practice had the potential for development of food borne illness and was evidenced by the following: On 5/19/25 at 8:43 AM, the surveyor conducted a tour of the kitchen with a Food Service Director (FSD) from another facility, the District Manager for the Food Service Management Company was present, and did not join the tour. Findings include: 1. A package of undated frozen pancakes was stored in the freezer and was not tightly wrapped. The surveyor asked about a use by date, and the FSD stated she could not tell when the package was opened and discarded it. 2. A metal table, with a sink and a shelf above the sink contained three plastic containers that were appeared stained and were stored with the opening directly on red cleaning…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-05-23 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — widespread
  Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of facility provided documentation, it was determined that the facility Licensed Nursing Home Administrator (LNHA) failed to ensure all residents received the care and services needed to maintain residents highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being by failing to ensure: a) a thorough investigation of an injury of unknown origin was completed, b) staffing was appropriate to meet resident needs to provide incontinence care in an appropriate and timely manner and according to the facility policy, c) staff followed the Center for Disease Control (CDC) guidelines and the facility's infection control policy to prevent the spread of potential infection, d) there was a process in place to ensure staff completed their annual competency evaluations. This deficient practice affected all facility residents and was evidenced by the following: Refer to F610, F677, F725, F730, F880 A review of the Administrator's job description provided by the facility revealed the following under position summary: Directs and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-05-23 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, review of records, and review of pertinent documents, it was determined that the facility failed to provide appropriate incontinence care, and personal hygiene care for 2 of 4 residents (Resident #82 and #58) reviewed for Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) on 1 of 2 resident units, (B Wing Unit). The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: 1. On 5/18/25 at 7:45 PM, the surveyor toured the B Wing Unit, and observed a strong feces and urine odor in the hallway. All the residents were observed in bed at that time. On 5/18/25 at 8:29 PM, the surveyor observed Resident #82 in an enclosure bed (a complete bed system resembling a tent, designed to provide safety). The resident was facing the window. From a clear unobstructed view through the open door, the surveyor observed the resident's incontinence brief was bulging from the back. The surveyor then observed the resident was asleep, and there was no sheet to cover the bed. The Surveyor then observed 3 incontinence pads on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-05-23 · tag F0730 — pattern
  Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview, record review and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to complete a performance review of Certified Nurse Aides (CNA) at least every 12 months. The deficient practice was identified for 4 of 5 Certified Nurse Aides reviewed under Sufficient and Competent Nurse Staffing task. The deficient practice was evidenced by: A review of the facility-provided CNA annual performance evaluations revealed that 4 of the 5 CNAs did not have an annual performance evaluation for 2024. On 05/22/25 09:41 AM during an interview with the surveyor, the Liscensed Nursing Home Administrator (LNHA) confirmed there were no performance evaluations for 2024 for 4 out of 5 CNA's. The LNHA stated, I know we should have them, but we don't, the place fell apart. The LNHA stated they have had two Director of Nursing's and an interim DON in the past year. The LNHA had no further information to provide. A review of an undated facility provided policy titled Employee Evaluation revealed: Each employee will have a written evaluation of their job…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-05-23 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and document review it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a) appropriate Personal Protective Equipment was utilized while providing care to a resident who required Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP), b) soiled linens were appropriately handled, and c) appropriate hand hygiene was performed per facility and Center for Disease Control Guidance. The deficient practice occurred on 1 of 3 resident units (The Annex) and was evidenced by the following: On 05/21/25 at 9:54 AM, the surveyor entered the Annex Unit and observed Resident #103 was in the room, the curtain was pulled, and staff were heard talking to resident while providing care. On 05/21/25 at 9:59 AM, the surveyor observed a sign posted outside of Resident #103's door that revealed Enhanced Barrier Precautions, Everyone Must: Clean their hands, including before entering and when leaving the room. Providers and Staff Must Also: Wear gloves and a gown for the following High-Contact Resident Care Ativities. Dressing, Bathing/Showereing, Transaferring, Changing Linens, Providing…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-05-23 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a) the required ambient air temperature (between 71-81 degrees Farenheight) was maintained in all resident areas, and the shower room with an adjacent storage area was maintained in a clean and sanitary manner. The deficient practice was identified for 1 of 2 shower areas on the B-Wing Unit, for the 6 bed Annex Unit and was evidenced by the following: On 5/18/25 at 7:29 PM, during a tour of the B-Wing Unit shower room the surveyor observed what appeared to be a brown feces covered washcloth wrapped around the bath sprayer nozzle which was below the bath stretcher that was on top of the bath. The surveyor showed the Registered Nurse Supervisor (RNS) who stated, she was not sure what happened. The surveyor then entered the attached store room and a tub of urine cups was stored directly on the floor and what appeared to be a mop or broom handle was stored inside the tub. The RNS stated someone must have dropped them (urine cups) there. On 05/21/25 at 9:54 AM, the surveyor entered the Annex Unit and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-23 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  REPEAT DEFICIENCY Based on interview, medical record review and review of other facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to complete a thorough investigation of an injury of unknown origin, and to rule out abuse. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for abuse, Resident #37 and was evidenced by the following: On 5/22/25 at 10:08 AM, the surveyor reviewed the electronic medical record for Resident #37. According to the admission Record, Resident #37 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses which included, but were not limited to; Spastic quadriplegic cerebral palsy (is a severe type that is characterized by paralysis of both arms and both legs, with muscle stiffness), Contracture (a condition of shortening and hardening of muscles, tendons, or other tissue, often leading to restricted joint mobility) and Septo-optic dysplasia of brain (is a disorder of early brain and eye development). A review of Resident #37's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (an assessment tool used to facilitate the management of care) dated 03/27/25, reflected…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-05-23 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review and review of pertinent documents it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a system was in place to ensure devices used to prevent contractures were consistently applied per physician order. The deficient practice occurred for 1 of 6 residents reviewed for positioning (Resident #84) and was evidenced by the following: On 5/18/25 at 8:00 PM, the surveyor observed Resident #84 in bed sleeping with both hands visibly contracted and there was no device inside both hands. There were two posters on the wall above Resident #84's bed detailing the use of Resident #84's right and left hand roll (a device used to prevent the hands from closing into the palms). On 5/19/25 at 9:30 AM, the surveyor reviewed the medical record for Resident #84 which revealed the following: - The admission Record revealed the resident had diagnoses which included, but were not limited to; Localization-related (Focal)(Partial) symptomatic epilepsy and epileptic syndromes with simple…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$33,579 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $33,579 — penalty dated 2025-10-21

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to MILLENNIUM HEALTH SYSTEMS — 4 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 17 rows in the source record cover these 9 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

6 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 76% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $3.6M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NJ