Solaris Healthcare Bayonet Point

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

58.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 373 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 58.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 163 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.34 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 57% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 26% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 180 beds and averages 175.5 residents a day — about 98% occupied, or roughly 4 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.68 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.72 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.14 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.25 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.85 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.85 to 0.41 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 41% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

20 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 8 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · J2025-09-26 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and policy and procedure review the facility failed to ensure the residents rights were honored by failing to implement/follow formulated advance directives for one resident (#209) of one resident reviewed. Resident #209 had an Advanced Directive for Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) formulated, which staff did not follow. The DNR was not honored by the facility when they failed to obtain clarification of code status during the admission process, per facility policy. This failure resulted in the resident experiencing sternal and anterior chest wall pain, serious psychosocial harm by not honoring the resident's wishes for a natural, dignified death. Findings included: Review of Resident #209 medical record documented an admission date of [DATE] with medical diagnoses to include displaced bimalleolar fracture of lower leg, subsequent encounter for closed fracture with routine healing, s/p (status post) ORIF(open reduction internal fixation), sprain of tibiofibular ligament of left ankle,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Immediate jeopardy · J2025-09-26 · tag F0678 — failed to provide CPR when needed — isolated
  Provide basic life support, including CPR, prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel , subject to physician orders and the resident’s advance directives.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review and policy and procedure review the facility failed to honor a resident's expressed Advanced Directive for end of life for one resident (#209) of one resident reviewed, by failing to ensure life saving measures of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) were not performed when Resident #209 was found unresponsive and absent of vital signs. Resident #209 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a fully executed State of Florida Do NOT RESUSCITATE ORDER (DNR) DH (Department of Health) form 1896,Revised [DATE] dated [DATE]. Resident #209's representative provided a copy to the facility on [DATE] at 12:40 PM. The facility's unlicensed staff did not provide the DNR order to a licensed staff member for processing. Resident #209 was found unresponsive and absent of vital signs on [DATE] at 2:12 PM. The resident's wishes were not honored, and CPR was initiated. Resident #209 survived and was transferred to an area hospital. Findings included: Review of Resident #209 medical record…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · E2025-09-26 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure food was stored safely and properly labeled in one reach-in cooler out of one reach-in cooler observed in the kitchen.Findings included:A walk-through tour of the kitchen was conducted on 9/22/25 at 08:47 AM with the Dietary Manager (DM).An observation was made of several containers of food in the walk-in cooler without an identifying label or date.An interview was conducted with the Dietary Manager (DM) 9/22/2025 at 9:09AM. The DM stated all items placed in the cooler should have a label and be dated and there were no identifying labels on food that had been placed in the walk-in cooler from the breakfast meal.A policy titled Food Receiving and Storage dated 10/10/18 read, 7. All foods stored in the refrigerator or freezer will be covered, labeled and dated.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-09-26 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review and policy and procedure review, the facility failed to prevent the possible spread of infection and communicable diseases by failing to ensure staff used appropriate Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) and performed hand hygiene upon entering and exiting residents rooms while providing care to residents on enhanced barrier precautions for (Resident # 194), and contact precautions for (Resident #188) and did not perform hand hygiene upon entering and exiting resident's rooms during five observations of ten observations of medication administration. Findings included: During an observation of medication administration for Resident #41 on 9/26/2025 at 5:04 AM , Staff V, Registered Nurse (RN) approached the medication cart without performing hand hygiene, retrieved keys from their pocket, and unlocked the medication cart. Staff activated and typed on the computer. Staff prepared all medications and assembled supplies to perform an accucheck. Staff V entered Resident #41's room, without performing hand hygiene, donned gloves and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-09-26 · tag F0640 — isolated
  Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure a resident a minimum data set assessment was transmitted within 14 days after completion for one resident (#12) of two residents reviewed for resident assessment. Findings included:Review of Resident #12's electronic medical record on 9/25/2025 showed a resident assessments history that documented Resident #12's annual minimum data set assessment (MDS) was completed on 8/3/2025 with a designation of Production Batch. The review showed Resident #12's MDS assessment was not transmitted to CMS on 8/3/2025 and was past the 14-day transmittal requirement. During an interview on 9/25/2025 at 8:40 AM, the Care Plan Coordinator/Registered Nurse (RN) stated that once a minimum data set assessment is completed, the assessment is sent to the corporate office for review before submission to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS). She explained the corporate office reviews the assessment and sends a validation report to the facility for corrections if needed. She specified the assessment should be forwarded to the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-09-26 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to administer insulin according to professional standards of practice for two residents (#152 and #5) of four residents reviewed for insulin administration and failed to administer cardiovascular medications according to professional standards of practice for one resident (#185) of four residents reviewed for cardiovascular medication administration. Findings included: 1.Review of Resident #152’s medical record documented diagnosis that include hypertensive chronic kidney disease with stage 1 through stage 4 chronic kidney disease, type 2 diabetes mellitus with diabetic polyneuropathy, type 2 diabetes mellitus with hyperglycemia (high blood sugar), atherosclerotic heart disease of native coronary artery (heart disease) without angina pectoris (chest pain), long term use of insulin, and hypoglycemia (low blood sugar). Review of Resident #152's physician orders dated 9/13/2025 read, Insulin Semglee (insulin-glargine-yfgn) pen 100 unit/ml(milliliter)(3ml) amount to administer: 30 units SQ (subcutaneous) at bedtime for DM…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-09-26 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
  Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure physician ordered parameters were followed for blood pressure medications resulting in the administration of unnecessary medications for three residents (#157, #10 and #91) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications.Findings include:1.Review of Resident #157's medical record documented diagnosis that include fracture of unspecified part of the neck of right femur, subsequent encounter for closed fracture with routine healing, presence of right artificial hip joint, other sequalae of other cerebrovascular disease, urinary tract infection site not specified, sepsis due to Escherichia coli, hypothyroidism unspecified, hyperlipidemia unspecified, hypertensive chronic kidney disease with stage 1 through 4 chronic kidney disease, and orthostatic hypotension (a form of low blood pressure that happens when standing up from sitting or lying down).Review of Resident #157's physician order dated 9/5/2025 read, Midodrine tablet: 2.5 mg (milligram); amt(amount);2.5 mg; oral; special instructions: Hold if SBP (systolic…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-26 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to properly store medications for two residents (#212 and #213) in one unit (200) out of 3 units observed.Findings included: 1.) During an observation on 9/22/2025 at 9:38 AM Resident #212 was sitting up on her bed. There was an Arnica cream on top of her bedside table.During an interview on 9/22/2025 at 9:38 AM Resident #212 stated, I use the cream at times for pain. I will apply it [arnica cream] to my shoulder and it helps me.During an observation on 9/25/2025 at 12:19 PM Resident #212 was sitting up on her bed. There was an Arnica cream on top of her bedside table.During an interview on 9/25/2025 at 12:32 PM Staff I Registered Nurse (RN) confirmed Resident #212 had an Arnica cream in the resident's room.Review of Resident #212's physician orders did not document the resident was able to self-administer medications.2.) During an observation on 9/22/2025 at 9:45 AM Resident #213's room was observed empty. On top of her bedside table there was a Vicks Vaporub cream. [photographic evidence obtained]During an…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-09-26 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review the facility failed to accurately and adequately document medication administration for antidiabetic and cardiovascular medications for three residents (#35, #85 and #185) of seven residents reviewed for medication management. Findings included: 1.) Review of Resident #35's physician order dated 6/2/2025 read, Lantus Solostar U-100 Insulin (insulin glargine) insulin pen; 100 unit /ml [milliliters] (3ml) amt [amount] 44 units subcutaneous special instructions hold FBS <100 [fasting blood sugar less than 100].Review of Resident #35's physician order dated 9/5/2025 read, Lantus Solostar U-100 Insulin (insulin glargine) Insulin pen; 100 unit /ml (3ml) amt 46 units subcutaneous special instructions hold FBS <100.Review of Resident #35's Medication Administration Record (MAR) for the month of September 2025 for Lantus Solostar with parameters to hold if fasting blood sugar was less than 100 documented as given on 9/1/2025 at 7:30 AM blood sugar level was 80, 9/10/2025 at 7:30 AM blood sugar level was 79, 9/16/2025 at 7:30 AM blood sugar level was 95,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-29 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — pattern
  Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of pharmacy recommendations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the attending physician documented in the residents medical records the rationale for not acting on and following pharmacy recommendation for two (#2 and #19) of three residents reviewed for pharmacy recommendations. Findings included: Review of Resident #2's medical record documented an admission date of 2/16/2024 and included the following diagnoses: depression, anxiety disorder, pulmonary hypertension a type of high blood pressure that affects the arteries in the lungs), emphysema (a disorder that affects the tiny air sacs in the lungs), and pulmonary fibrosis (scarring of the tissue around the airs sacs in the lungs). Review of the document tiled, Consultant Pharmacist's Report for Resident #2 recommendation date of 2/23/2024 reads, Findings/Recommendations: New admission medication regimen review. admission summary: This 77 y/o (year old) resident was readmitted on [DATE]. #1) Beers drug/potentially inappropriate…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-29 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and policy and procedure review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to help prevent the transmission of communicable diseases and infection, by failing to perform hand hygiene during medication administration for three (Residents #12,#13 and #14) of six residents observed for medication administration. The findings included: During an observation of medication administration on 4/25/2025 at 5:39 AM Staff A, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), returned to the medication cart from a resident room, removed medication cart keys from their pocket, unlocked the medication cart, activated the computer and typed on the computer. Staff A, LPN removed medication from the medication cart, and went to Resident #12's room, entered the room without performing hand hygiene, assisted the resident to reposition in bed and administered the medication to Resident #12. Staff A, LPN exited the resident's room and returned to the medication cart without performing hand hygiene. During an observation of medication…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-29 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure drugs and biologicals were stored in a secured manner to limit unauthorized access to medications for one (#14) of three residents reviewed for medication storage. The findings included: During an observation on 4/25/2025 at 5:51 AM Resident #14 had one tube of Ease-Z Diabetics dry skin therapy foot cream containing Zinc on her bedside table and one bottle of ActivICE pain reliever gel roll on. During an interview on 4/25/2025 at 6:05 AM Staff A, Licensed Practical Nurse(LPN) stated. I don't know what those lotions are on her nightstand. Her family brings those in for her. She does not need an order for those. During an observation on 4/25/2025 at 6:07 AM Staff A, LPN verified that one was a bottle of ActivICE and one was Ease Z diabetics dry skin therapy foot cream with Zinc. During an observation on 4/25/2025 at 10:10 AM the Director of Nursing (DON) and Regional Nurse Consultant (RNC) verified that Ease Z diabetics with Zinc and ActivICE bottle with barrier cream were unsecured on the resident's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$90,650 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $90,650 — penalty dated 2025-09-26

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to SOLARIS HEALTHCARE — 22 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 26 rows in the source record cover these 13 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $2.5M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 12% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in FL