Solaris Healthcare Celebration

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

61.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 579 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 58.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 238 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.64 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 90% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 28% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 115.9 residents a day — about 97% occupied, or roughly 4 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.08 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.05 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.30 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.79 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.20 on weekdays — 10% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.18 to 0.71 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 43% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

19 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 9 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · D2026-02-05 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a person-centered comprehensive care plan to address a hearing impairment, including interventions to promote the resident's highest practicable well-being for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for communication/sensory needs, of a total sample of 57 residents, (#189). Findings: Cross Reference F697 Review of resident #189's medical record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including fracture of the neck of the left femur, fracture of the lower end of the left radius, and history of falling. Review of the original State Agency 5000-3008 Medical Certification for Medicaid Long-Term Care Services and Patient Transfer Form, dated 1/28/26, revealed resident #189 was non-ambulatory, alert, oriented, and able to follow instructions. The form indicated the resident had impaired hearing and used a left hearing aid. Review of the hospital History and Physical form, dated 1/09/26, revealed a medical…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-05 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to obtain wound care orders and document wound care treatment per the resident's comprehensive, person-centered care plan, (#188); and failed to implement physician orders for treatment of psoriasis consistent with professional standards of practice, (#33), for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for non-pressure skin conditions, of a total sample of 57 residents.Findings: 1.Review of resident #188's medical record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including syncope and collapse, thrombocytopenia, anemia, and atrial fibrillation. Thrombocytopenia refers to a low platelet count, which increases the risk of bleeding due to impaired clot formation, (retrieved from www.mayoclinic.org on 2/07/26). Review of resident #188's physician orders revealed the following wound care orders initiated on 2/02/26: *Skin tear to left inner forearm: cleanse with normal saline, apply skin prep to periwound, apply Xeroform, cover with rolled…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-05 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the flow rate for Oxygen (O2) therapy was administered as per physician's order for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for O2 therapy, of a total sample of 57 residents, (#88).Findings:Resident #88 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Alzheimer's disease, failure to thrive, anemia, anxiety, depression, and subsequent encounter for palliative care. On 2/02/26 at 11:55 AM, resident #88 was observed in bed, she wore a nasal cannula attached to an oxygen concentrator. The O2 was set at 2.5 liters per minute (LPM), with the concentrator located inside her bathroom. A review of resident #88's medical record revealed O2 was ordered by the physician for 2 LPM by nasal cannula. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] showed a Brief Interview for Mental Status of 12/15, which indicated the resident's cognition was moderately impaired. The assessment indicated the resident required moderate to maximum assistance for activities…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-05 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
  Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement physician orders for pain management accurately and timely; and failed to effectively manage pain in accordance with the resident's care plan and goals, for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for pain, of a total sample of 57 residents, (#189). Findings: Cross Reference F656 Review of resident #189's medical record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including fracture of the neck of the left femur, fracture of the lower end of the left radius, and history of falling. Review of resident #189's Brief Interview for Mental Status assessment dated [DATE] revealed a score of 15 out of 15 indicating intact cognition. Review of the comprehensive care plan, initiated on 1/30/26, revealed resident #189 had pain and discomfort related to fractures of the left femur and left radius. The goal was for pain to be at or below the resident's stated acceptable level. Interventions included administering pain medication per…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-05-23 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, staff interview, cleaning schedule, and policy and procedure review, the facility failed to maintain food safety standards, such as ensuring food employees used beverage containers that prevented contamination from hands; resident Time/Temperature Control for Safety (TCS) food was not stored too long under refrigeration; ensure that food and non-food contact surfaces were clean to sight and touch; bathrooms used by food employees were equipped with handwashing signage; ensure that exposed food, clean equipment and clean utensils were protected from contamination from non-Food and Nutrition Services staff unrestrained hair; and clean equipment and utensils were stored in a clean and dry location and protected from splash. These findings have the potential to cause foodborne illness for 101 out of 109 residents who consumed the facility's food. The findings included: During the Initial Brief Tour of the Kitchen with the Director of Food and Nutrition Services on 5/20/24 at 10:24 AM, there was an employee's bottled water container with a twist off lid and a blue…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-05-23 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to honor resident's rights to choose their bathing preference for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for choices, of a total sample of 47 residents, (#17). Findings: Review of the medical record revealed resident #17 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] from a skilled nursing facility. His diagnosis included cervical disc disorder, syncope and collapse, difficulty in walking, ataxic gait, major depressive disorder, muscle weakness, and need for assistance with personal care. Resident #17's Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an assessment reference date of 4/08/24 revealed the resident scored 13 out of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status which indicated he did not have any cognitive impairment. The MDS assessment also indicated it was very important to the resident to choose his bathing preferences. The MDS assessment showed the resident required substantial/maximal assistance for bathing and noted the resident did not exhibit behavior…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-05-23 · tag F0623 — pattern
  Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide written Notification of Transfer or Discharge forms to the residents or their representative for 3 of 3 residents reviewed for hospitalization, of a total sample of 47 residents, (#51, #64 and #117). Findings: 1. Resident #51 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including cerebral infarction, gastrointestinal hemorrhage, chronic respiratory failure, type 2 diabetes, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, Alzheimer's Disease, and cerebrovascular disease. Review of resident #51's medical record revealed she was transferred to the hospital on 3/17/24 due to hypokalemia and on 4/03/24 due to gastrointestinal bleeding. Resident #51 returned to the facility following each hospital transfer. The medical record contained a Notification of Transfer or Discharge form for each hospital transfer. The form dated 3/17/24 indicated resident #51's daughter was notified of the transfer by phone and the form dated 4/03/24 indicated resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-05-23 · tag F0680 — pattern
  Ensure the activities program is directed by a qualified professional.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to employ a qualified professional to serve as the Activity Director. Findings: On 5/23/24 at 3:37 PM, during a Background Screening review with the Human Resources (HR) Director, the HR Director reported the Activity Director was hired on 1/23/24. A review of the Activity Director's Background Screening revealed she had worked for an Assisted Living Facility (ALF) for 1 year and 8 months prior to her employment date. The HR Director reviewed the Activity Director's personnel file and stated she was unable to locate certification for the Activity Director. Verbal information was provided the Activity Director was enrolled in the course to become certified but was not currently certified. On 5/23/24 at 3:54 PM, the Activity Director verified she was hired 1/23/24. She explained prior to this position she worked as an Activity Assistant at an ALF. The Activity Director stated she enrolled in an online national activity training course in March 2024. She acknowledged she had not completed the course as of 5/23/24. The Activity…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-05-23 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — pattern
  Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on meal observation, resident and staff interviews, menu review, and medical record review, the facility failed to provide three residents (#43, #106, and #419) their prescribed sodium-restricted diets out of three residents reviewed for food quality and a randomly observed resident during the Dining Observation Task. This occurred at three meals during the four day survey. The findings included: During the Dining Observation task on 5/20/24 at 12:57 PM, Resident #419 was eating lunch in her room. She had her lunch tray and the tray ticket documented NAS [No Added Salt] Regular. There was a salt packet on her tray and saltine crackers. Photographic evidence taken. On 5/22/24 at 9:20 AM. Resident #106 was in bed awake. His wife was setting up his meal tray. He had scrambled eggs, French toast, cranberry juice; milk, oatmeal. The tray ticket documented Liberalized Renal diet. There were two salt packets on his tray. Photographic evidence obtained. On 5/22/24 at 9:33 AM, Resident #419 was in bed and she finished her breakfast and her tray was set aside. She ate her oatmeal and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-05-23 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — pattern
  Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to indicate the duration of an as needed (PRN) anti-anxiety/anxiolytic medication for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for psychotropic medications, of a total sample of 47 residents, (#56). Findings: Review of the medical record revealed resident #56 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] from the hospital. Her diagnosis included major depressive disorder, generalized anxiety disorder, Alzheimer's disease, encounter for palliative care, and adult failure to thrive. Resident #56's Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an assessment reference date of 4/30/24 revealed the resident had moderately impaired cognitive skills for daily decision making. The Annual MDS noted that the resident received antianxiety medications. The MDS also noted the resident did not exhibit behavior symptoms or rejection of care necessary to achieve the resident's goals for health and well-being. Review of resident #56's medical record revealed a care plan initiated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to SOLARIS HEALTHCARE — 22 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

5 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $2.1M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 21% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in FL