Solaris Healthcare Imperial

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

68.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 350 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 49.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 191 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.51 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 81% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 31% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 113 beds and averages 97.4 residents a day — about 86% occupied, or roughly 16 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.53 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.63 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.15 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.34 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.61 on weekdays — 8% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.66 to 0.56 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 11% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

19 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 8 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2024-11-22 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy and procedure, record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to thoroughly investigate falls and implement adequate interventions to prevent falls and fall related injury for 1 (Resident #24) of 3 residents reviewed who were identified as being at risk for falls and sustained multiple falls at the facility. The findings included: The facility policy Incident Report and Investigation Guidelines documented, All falls, altercations, elopements/unplanned exits, alleged neglect, alleged misappropriation or exploitation of resident property or other events leading to harm or injury to a visitor or resident (incidents) occurring in the facility or on facility property will be documented and investigated and recorded on an Incident Report and Investigation form. A thorough investigation of each incident shall be completed by the Director of Nursing (DON), Charge Nurse or Supervisor, and the facility Risk Manager. An adverse incident is an event over which the facility…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-22 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — pattern
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based of observation, medical record review and facility policy review, the facility failed to assess bladder incontinence for 2 (Residents #37, and #92) of 2 residents reviewed for incontinence, and failed to provide appropriate care of indwelling urinary catheters for 2 (Residents #64 and #50) of 2 sampled residents observed with urinary catheters. The findings included: Review of the facility policy for the BOWEL AND BLADDER REHABILITATION PROGRAM reads, General Guidelines 1. The initiation of a continence program requires the consent and cooperation of the resident/responsible party. 2. The continence program must be individualized and resident centered to decrease or prevent urinary incontinence in order to minimize or avoid negative consequences of incontinence. 3. Steps to ensure that the resident receives appropriate treatment and services to restore urinary continence include: Determining if the resident is currently experiencing some level of incontinence or is at risk of developing urinary…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-11-22 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
  Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to maintain sufficient staffing to ensure call lights were answered in a timely manner for 7 (Resident #94, #70, #63, #37, #22, #73, and #200) of 7 residents sampled. The failure to respond to call lights in a timely manner places residents at increased risks for injuries related to falls. The findings included: On 11/18/24 at 11:05 a.m., in an interview Resident #94 said it can take between ten to thirty minutes for staff to respond to a call light. Resident #94 said the lack of staff response occurred more often on the 3:00 p.m. to 11:00 p.m. shift. Resident #94 was observed to activate the call light on 11/18/24 at 11:06 a.m. Resident #94 said he should not have to wait more than five minutes. On 11/18/24 at 11:18 a.m., Certified Nursing Assistant, Staff H responded to the resident's call light. When asked how long a resident had to wait for the call light to be answered, Staff H said two to five minutes. Staff H said he could not answer…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-11-22 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, review of facility policy and procedure, review of the clinical record and staff interviews the facility failed to store resident care equipment in a sanitary manner for 2 (Residents #23 and #53) of 6 residents reviewed and failed to follow infection prevention during wound care for 1 (Resident #50) of 1 resident observed for wound care. The findings included: The facility Policies and Practices- Infection Control documented This facility's infection control policies and practices are intended to facilitate maintaining a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and to help prevent and manage transmission of diseases and infections. The objectives of our infection control policies and practices are to: a. Prevent, detect, investigate, and control infections in the facility. b. Maintain a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment for personnel, residents, visitors and the general public. 1. On 11/20/24 at 12:39 p.m., Registered Nurse (RN) Staff M, Infection Preventionist was observed changing Resident #50's dressing to a left ischeal wound. Two CNAs…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-11-22 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, clinical record review, review of facility's policy and procedure, resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide the necessary assistance with activities of daily living for 1 (Resident #53) of 1 resident observed with urine filled containers at bedside. The findings included: The facility policy Activities of Daily Living (ADL), Supporting documented Residents who are unable to carry out activities of daily living independently will receive the services necessary to maintain good nutrition, grooming, and personal and oral hygiene. Review of the clinical record revealed Resident #53 had an admission date of 1/27/23 with diagnoses including schizophrenia, depression, tremors, anxiety and dementia. Review of the care plan initiated on 4/26/23 identified the problem: Incontinent of bowel and bladder. The goal for the resident specified incontinent needs will be met. The approaches documented Assist with changing brief when noted to be soiled or wet. Resident continues to keep urinals on floor. Continues to be educated on infection control. On…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-11-22 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, review of the clinical record, review of facility policy and procedures and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide care and services to prevent a decline in range of motion for 1 (Resident #50) of 1 resident reviewed with an orthotic device. The findings included: The facility policy Orthotic's documented, An orthotic is a device, sometimes called a brace or splint that is used to properly position a body part for the purpose of function, rest or protection of a joint . A resident with a condition that warrants the use of an orthosis will ideally be assessed through an interdisciplinary process and a plan of care will be established to address the use of the orthotic device. Benefits of orthotic: Prevent or reduce contractures and deformity by applying prolonged, steady stretches of tight muscles/joint structures. Maintain proper joint positioning and alignment. Reduce pain and or increase functional use of extremity by applying support for involved joint (s). Promote skin integrity and improve hygiene. Review of the clinical record revealed Resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-11-22 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, review of facility policy and procedure, review of the clinical record, resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to maintain respiratory equipment in a sanitary manner for 2 (Residents #64 and #23) of 2 residents reviewed. The findings included: The facility Policies and Practices- Infection Control documented This facility's infection control policies and practices are intended to facilitate maintaining a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and to help prevent and manage transmission of diseases and infections. The objectives of our infection control policies and practices are to: a. Prevent, detect, investigate, and control infections in the facility. b. Maintain a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment for personnel, residents, visitors and the general public. 1. Review of the clinical record revealed Resident #64 had an admission date of 5/28/24 with diagnoses obstructive and reflux uropathy, chronic kidney disease with heart failure and stage 1 through stage 4 chronic kidney disease, history of malignant neoplasm of the prostate, and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-11-22 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
  Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure 1 (Resident #70) of 5 residents reviewed had a diagnosis, and rationale for the use of antipsychotic medication. The findings included: Clinical record review revealed Resident #70 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included Anxiety Disorder, Mood Disorder, and Hallucinations. A physician's order dated 11/5/24 read, quetiapine [Seroquel] tablet; 25 mg; 0.5 tablet at bedtime. No diagnosis for the use of the Seroquel (antipsychotic) was documented in the order. On 11/21/24 at 12:15 p.m., in an interview the DON verified there was no diagnosis documented on the physician's order for Seroquel for Resident #70.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-11-22 · tag F0882 — isolated
  Designate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, facility policy and practices review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the Infection Preventionist had the required qualifications to perform the role of Infection Preventionist. The findings included: The facility policy Infection Preventionist documented The Infection Preventionist is responsible for coordinating the implementation and updating of our established infection prevention and control policies and practices. The Infection Preventionist shall keep abreast of changes in infection prevention and control guidelines and regulations to ensure our facility's protocols remain current and aid in preventing and controlling the spread of infections. On 11/20/24 at 12:39 p.m., Registered Nurse (RN) Staff M, Infection Preventionist was observed changing Resident #50's dressing to the left ischeal wound. Two CNAs repositioned Resident #50 to the right side. A nonstick border dressing was observed on the resident's left ischium and a very large foam dressing covered the resident's rectum and both upper buttocks. Staff M donned a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-08-27 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — pattern
  Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based upon interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from significant medication errors by not administering medications in accordance with prescriber's orders for 1 (Resident #1) of 3 residents reviewed receiving anti-coagulant medications. The findings included: Record review of Resident #1's chart revealed he had been discharged to the facility from the hospital on 7/17/24. The hospital discharge indicated he was to continue receiving Lovenox 110 mg (milligrams) injections every 12 hours (anticoagulant medication that prevents blood clots from forming in the bloodstream). The hospital discharge paperwork also indicated the Lovenox injections were to continue for 1 month then likely convert to an oral anticoagulant after that. The Skilled Nursing facility physician progress note on 8/14/24 indicated Lovenox twice a day for 1 month (8/20/24) and change to Eliquis on 8/21/24. (Eliquis is an anticoagulant medication.) On 8/27/24 at 9:45 a.m., the Director of Nursing (DON) provided a witness statement from Staff A Registered Nurse (RN) that said on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-03-13 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, and staff interviews, the facility failed to report an incident which could constitute neglect to the State Survey Agency within the specified timeframe for 1 (Resident #1) of 4 residents reviewed for falls. The findings included: On review of facility Incident Report & Investigation it indicated that Resident #1 had a fall from bed on 2/25/24 and sustained a laceration to the left side of his head. The resident was also assessed as being more confused and could not even say his name. Resident #1 was sent to the hospital for evaluation and treatment. On review of Resident #1 fall investigation, it was discovered that Certified Nurse's Aide (CNA) Staff A, made a statement that she had forgotten to put the floor mat back on the floor beside Resident #1 bed after she performed care. Record review revealed that Resident #1 was admitted to the facility with diagnosis of a history of urinary tract infections, muscle weakness, history of falls, dementia, insomnia, restlessness and agitation, diabetes, and depression. On review of Resident #1 plan of care for being…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$29,738 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $29,738 — penalty dated 2024-11-22

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to SOLARIS HEALTHCARE — 22 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 32 rows in the source record cover these 16 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $1.6M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 12% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in FL