Solaris Healthcare Waterman

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

64.3% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 703 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 55.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 434 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.67 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 91% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 31% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 117.0 residents a day — about 98% occupied, or roughly 3 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.07 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.77 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.25 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.51 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.29 on weekdays — 18% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.92 to 0.42 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 45% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

17 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 7 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-03 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure infection control and prevention measures were followed for hand hygiene during wound care for 2 (Resident #3 and Resident #5) of 5 residents reviewed for wounds.Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #3's admission record revealed he was admitted on [DATE] with medical diagnoses that included rhabdomyolysis and methicillin resistant staphylococcus aureus infection. Review of Resident #3's physicians' orders dated 3/27/2026 read, Left Lateral Calf: cleanse wound with normal saline, pat dry, apply hydrogel saturated gauze, and cover with dry dressing daily and as needed: every day shift AND as needed for saturated, soiled, and dislodged dressing.Review of Resident #3's Physicians' Orders dated 3/25/2026 read, Left Hip Reddened Area: cleanse with soap and water, pat dry, apply house zinc every shift and as needed: every shift for redness AND as needed for redness.During an observation on 4/03/2026 at 11:40 AM, the Wound Care Nurse…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-01 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents' preference for shower date and time was honored for 1 of 4 residents reviewed (Resident #107). Findings include: During an observation on 7/30/2025 at 8:50 AM, the communication board in Resident #107's room showed that the resident was scheduled to have two showers weekly on Wednesday and Sundays. During an interview on 7/30/2025 at 8:45 AM, Resident #107 stated that her usual shower days were Sundays and Wednesdays. This past Sunday (7/27/2025), she requested a shower, and the aide informed her that she could not have a shower, only a bed bath. The resident informed the aide that she did not want a bed bath, she wanted a shower, but the aide refused and informed her she would give a bed bath. The resident stated that she was never given a bed bath or a shower on 7/27/2025. During an interview on 7/30/2025 at 12:23 PM, Staff A, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA), stated that she was the aide providing care for Resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-01 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide respiratory services consistent with professional standards of practice for 3 of 4 residents reviewed for oxygen therapy (Residents #46, #136, and #139). Findings include: 1. During an observation on 7/28/2025 at 10:30 AM, Resident #46 was sitting in the recliner, receiving oxygen via nasal cannula at 3.5 liters per minute (LPM). During an observation on 7/29/2025 at 10:11 AM, Resident #46 was receiving oxygen via nasal cannula at 3.5 LPM. Review of Resident #46's physician orders showed an order dated 7/1/2025 for administration of oxygen at 2 LPM every shift. During an interview on 7/29/2025 at 10:11 AM, Resident #46, stated, I never touch the setting on the concentrator. I do not know how or where to adjust. 2. During an observation on 7/28/2025 at 9:16 AM, Resident #147’s nebulizer mask was clipped on the nebulizer machine sitting on the resident’s bedside table. The mask was not bagged. The resident was receiving oxygen at 4.5 LPM with humidification (Photographic evidence obtained). During an…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-01 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and policy and procedure review, the facility failed to prevent the possible spread of infection and communicable diseases when failing to place a resident on contact precaution during testing for possible C-Diff (Clostridium difficile) toxin (Resident #94), and failing to ensure staff donned appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE) and performed appropriate hand hygiene upon entering and exiting the resident's room. Findings include: During an observation on 7/28/2025 at 11:13 AM, there was no isolation signage on Resident #94's room door and there was no PPE available. During an interview on 7/28/2025 at 11:13 AM, Resident #94 stated, I have been having loose stool, and they did a test on it for me. I had that C. diff before. Review of Resident #94's physician orders dated 7/28/2025 read, Need Stool r/o (rule out) possible recurrent C-diff one time only for check for possible recurrent C-diff for 3 Days. During an observation on 7/29/2025 at 9:18 AM, Staff F, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA), entered Resident #94's room, used hand…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-25 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to utilize appropriate isolation precaution signages to help prevent the possible transmission of communicable diseases and infections for Residents #19, #82, and #85 (Photographic evidence obtained), and failed to ensure the staff used appropriate PPE (Personal Protective Equipment) while providing direct care to the residents on isolation precautions for Resident #418. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #19's physician order dated 4/21/2024 read, COVID-19: Strict Isolation: Resident require strict isolation for positive COVID-19 every shift for COVID positive for 10 days. Review of Resident #19's care plan dated 4/22/2024 read, Focus: Resident is diagnosed with COVID-19 infection. Date Initiated: 04/22/2024 . Interventions . Droplet Isolation Precautions. During an observation on 4/22/2024 at 9:48 AM, Resident #19's door had a sign reading Enhanced Barrier Precautions on the door. Review of Resident #82's physician order dated 4/19/2024 read, COVID-19: Strict Isolation: Resident require strict isolation…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-04-25 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Dat Set (MDS) assessment accurately reflected the resident's status for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for oxygen therapy, Resident #420, and 1 of 3 residents reviewed for discharge, Resident #115. Findings include: 1. During an observation on 4/22/2024 at 9:26 AM, Resident #420 was lying in bed, receiving oxygen at 2 liters per minute via nasal cannula. Review of Resident #420's physician order dated 4/5/2024 read, Oxygen (2L/nc prn) [liters via nasal canula as needed] as needed. Review of Resident #420's weights and vitals summary showed that the resident was receiving oxygen via nasal cannula on 4/4/2024, 4/6/2024, and 4/7/2024. Review of Resident #420's 5-Day MDS dated [DATE] did not show oxygen coded as in use while being a resident in the facility. During an interview on 4/24/2024 at 1:07 PM, the MDS Director stated, I do not look at the vitals CNAs [Certified Nursing Assistants] put in. I trust the nurse…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-25 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents received medication as per physician order for 1 of 6 residents reviewed for blood pressure medication, Resident #106. Findings include: Review of Resident #106's physician order dated 3/15/2024 read, Midodrine HCl Oral Tablet 5 MG [milligram] (Midodrine HCl) Give 1 tablet by mouth every 8 hours for hypertension hold if SBP [Systolic Blood Pressure] greater than 130. Review of Resident #106's Medication Administration Record for April 2024 showed the resident received Midodrine 5 mg on 4/1/2024 at 2:00 PM with the blood pressure of 150/91, on 4/4/2024 at 2:00 PM with the blood pressure of 164/94 and at 10:00 PM with the blood pressure of 160/90, on 4/8/2024 at 10:00 PM with the blood pressure of 150/67, on 4/13/2024 at 10:00 PM with the blood pressure of 146/93, on 4/14/2024 at 6:00 AM with the blood pressure of 146/93, and on 4/22/2024 at 2:00 PM with the blood pressure of 138/83. During an interview on 4/24/2024 at 9:21 AM, the Director of Nursing stated, It was a medication error. I spoke with the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-04-25 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
  Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were not served known allergen food items for 1 of 6 residents reviewed for nutrition, Resident #419. Findings include: During an interview on 4/22/2024 at 10:12 AM, Resident #419 stated, I have been here in the facility for a few days. The food is not good. They give chicken twice a day. If you do not like it, they give you either a peanut butter sandwich which I am allergic to or turkey sandwich. During an observation on 4/22/2024 at 12:30 PM, Resident #419 was eating lunch in her room. The tray included a ham sandwich wrapped in plastic with a piece of lettuce and tomato garnish on the plate (Photographic evidence obtained). During an interview on 4/22/2024 at 12:30 PM, Resident #419 stated, If I had tomato, I would swell up. If it would have been on the sandwich, I would not be able to eat it. The sandwich came wrapped individually from the tomato. Review of Resident #419's admission record showed the resident was allergic to to Lisinopril, sulfa antibiotics, almond oil, peanuts, and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-04-25 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
  Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received the appropriate enteral feed for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for enteral feed administration, Resident #170. Findings include: Review of Resident #170's admission record showed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including hemiplegia and hemiparesis, chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, type 2 diabetes mellitus, dementia, and gastrostomy status. During an observation on 4/23/2024 at 1:45 PM, Resident #170's enteral feed pump was running at 70 ml/hr (milliliters/hour) (Photographic evidence obtained). Review of Resident #170's physician order dated 4/18/2024 read, Enteral Feed Order two times a day Enteral Glucerna 1.5 cal/ml [calorie/ milliliter] @ [at] 80 ml/hr x 20 hours. Off at 10 am and On at 2 pm (total volume 1600 ml). Review of Resident #170's care plan dated 4/17/2024 read, Focus: Resident requires enteral tube feeding for nutrition . Interventions . Enteral feeding as…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-25 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure foods and beverages were stored in a safe and sanitary manner in 1 of 4 nourishment rooms. Findings include: During an observation while conducting a tour of the facility's nourishment rooms with the Certified Dietary Manager on 4/22/2024 beginning at 9:38 AM, there were an unlabeled and undated plastic grocery bag with 2 containers of unidentifiable food on the top shelf of the refrigerator, an unlabeled Taco Bell bag containing one Taco with the date of 4/7/2024, an unlabeled Burger King bag containing a cheese burger and French fries with the date of 4/13/2024, and an unlabeled and undated Wendy's bag containing a burger and side salad in the right side drawer of the refrigerator, and four pieces of celery wrapped in saran wrap with a date of 4/13/2024 in the butter tray of the refrigerator in the 400 hall nourishment room. During an interview on 4/22/2024 approximately at 9:40 AM, the Certified Dietary Manager acknowledged the expired and/or undated and unlabeled foods in the refrigerator and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to SOLARIS HEALTHCARE — 22 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

5 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $2.4M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 22% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in FL