Florida Presbyterian Homes INC

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

63.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 220 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 70.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 134 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.50 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 81% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 21% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 68 beds and averages 63.4 residents a day — about 93% occupied, or roughly 5 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.81 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.04 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.21 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.53 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.92 on weekdays — 10% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.10 to 0.87 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 26% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

16 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 6 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · E2024-02-26 · tag F0644 — pattern
  Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based in interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the accuracy of the Level I Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASSAR) for four (#9, #40, #14 and #198) of five residents reviewed. Findings Included: 1. Record review revealed Resident #9 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included but not limited to Unspecified Mental Disorder due to known Physiological Disorder, Anxiety, Schizophrenia and Unspecified Dementia according to the Face Sheet. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed: -Section C: Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score 00, indicating severe cognitive impairment. -Section I: Active Diagnosis - none checked. -Section N: Medications administered - Antipsychotic and Antianxiety. Review of the Medication Administration Record (MAR) for February 2024 showed: -Divalproex 125 milligrams (mg) - 2 capsules orally twice daily for unspecified mental disorder -Quetiapine 50mg orally twice daily for schizophrenia -ABH [Ativan,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-02-26 · tag F0655 — pattern
  Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a baseline and comprehensive care plan was complete for three residents (#148, #150 and #152) related to catheter care (#148), the use of oxygen (#150), and dementia care (#148 and #152) of twenty-five sampled residents. Findings included: 1. On 2/24/24 at 10:12 a.m. an observation revealed Resident #148 sitting in his wheelchair in his room receiving oxygen via a nasal cannula and a droplet precautions sign on his door with personal protective equipment available in a bin. An observation and interview was conducted on 2/25/24 at 1:02 p.m. with Resident #148. He was in a wheelchair in his room receiving oxygen via a nasal cannula and had a [name brand] catheter with the bag covered by a privacy bag. Resident #148 stated he received his medications and could not confirm if he had an infection. He stated he only wears oxygen when he needs it. Review of the Medical Certification for Medicaid Long-Term Care Services and Patient…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-02-26 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — pattern
  Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain a medication error rate of less than 5%. A total of 30 medication administration opportunities were observed with 5 medication errors for one (#34) of five residents sampled for medication administration, which resulted in a medication administration error rate of 16.67%. Findings included: A review of Resident #34's medical record revealed Resident #34 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of vascular dementia, hypertension, major depressive disorder, and cognitive communication deficit. A review of Resident #34's physician's orders revealed the following orders: - An order, dated 1/3/2024, for escitalopram 10 milligrams (mg) by mouth one time daily at 9:00 AM. - An order, dated 1/3/2024, for gabapentin 100 mg by mouth three times a day at 8:00 AM, 2:00 PM, and 8:00 PM. - An order, dated 1/3/2024, for losartan 100 mg by mouth one time daily at 9:00 AM. - An order, dated 1/3/2024, for methocarbamol 500 mg by mouth…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-26 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure care and services were provided in a dignified manner to one (Resident #1) of twenty six sampled residents. Findings included: A review of Resident #1's medical record revealed Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of congestive heart failure, stage 3 chronic kidney disease, and non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI). A review of Resident #1's care plan revealed a focus area, initiated 2/23/2024, Resident #1 was at risk for alteration in nutritional status related to significant weight loss and various comorbidities. Interventions included to provide and serve diet as ordered and monitor intake with each meal. An observation was conducted on 2/24/2024 at 12:04 PM of Resident #1 during lunch. Resident #1 was being assisted with the lunch meal by Staff C, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) inside of the resident's room. Resident #1 was observed laying in bed with Staff C, CNA providing physical assistance with…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-02-26 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the accuracy of the Resident Assessment Minimum Data Set for one (#9) of five residents reviewed. Findings included: Record review revealed Resident #9 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included but not limited to Unspecified Mental Disorder due to known Physiological Disorder, Anxiety, Schizophrenia and Unspecified Dementia according to the Face Sheet. Review of the Medication Administration Record (MAR) for February 2024 showed: -Divalproex 125 milligrams (mg) - 2 capsules orally twice daily for unspecified mental disorder -Quetiapine 50mg orally twice daily for schizophrenia -ABH [Ativan, Lorazepam, Benadryl] Gel 2 milliliters (ml) topically every 8 hours for agitation related to anxiety. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed: -Section C: Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score 00, indicating severe cognitive impairment. -Section I: Active Diagnosis - none checked. -Section N:…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-02-26 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure respiratory care and services were provided in accordance with professional standards for two (Resident #1 and Resident #150) of three residents sampled for oxygen therapy and failed to ensure oxygen warning signs were posted outside of resident rooms when oxygen was in use for three (Resident #1, Resident #150, and Resident #6) of three residents sampled for oxygen therapy. Findings included: A review of Resident #1's medical record revealed Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of congestive heart failure, stage 3 chronic kidney disease, and non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI). A review of Resident #1's physician's orders revealed an order, dated 1/23/2024, for continuous oxygen at 2 liters per minute (lpm) via nasal cannula (NC). Resident #1's physician's orders also revealed an order, dated 2/18/2024, to check and maintain the oxygen concentrator setting at 2 lpm every shift. An observation was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-26 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
  Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure recommendations during medication regimen review were addressed and acted upon by the primary care provider for one (Resident #37) of six residents sampled for medication regimen review. Findings included: A review of Resident #37's medical record revealed Resident #37 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of dementia with agitation and cognitive communication deficit. A review of Resident #37's physician's orders revealed an order, dated 9/18/2023 for lorazepam 0.5 milligrams (mg) by mouth every 8 hours as needed for agitation. The order did not include a duration of use or end date. A review of Resident #37's progress notes, dated 9/18/2023 at 3:52 AM revealed Resident #37 displayed increased agitation and restlessness over several days. Resident #37's primary care provider (PCP) was notified and ordered lorazepam 0.5 mg by mouth every 8 hours as needed for agitation. A review of Resident #37's Medication…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-02-26 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
  Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure use of psychotropic meds on an as needed basis was limited to 14 days without rationale for continuation for two (Resident #37 and Resident #152) of six residents sampled for psychotropic medication use. Findings included: A review of Resident #37's medical record revealed Resident #37 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of dementia with agitation and cognitive communication deficit. A review of Resident #37's physician's orders revealed an order, dated 9/18/2023 for lorazepam 0.5 milligrams (mg) by mouth every 8 hours as needed for agitation. The order did not include a duration of use or end date. A review of Resident #37's progress notes, dated 9/18/2023 at 3:52 AM revealed Resident #37 displayed increased agitation and restlessness over several days. Resident #37's primary care provider (PCP) was notified and ordered lorazepam 0.5 mg by mouth every 8 hours as needed for agitation. A review of Resident #37's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2022-03-03 · tag F0882 — widespread
  Designate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Infection Control Preventionist (ICP) had specialized training in Infection Control and Prevention. Findings included: An interview was conducted on 03/03/2022 at 12:47 p.m. with the facility's Director of Nursing (DON). The DON stated she was acting as the facility's ICP but did not have any specialized training related to infection control and prevention. The DON also stated she was not aware of any staff in the facility having specialized training related to infection control and prevention. An interview was conducted on 03/03/2022 at 1:29 p.m. with the facility's Nursing Home Administrator (NHA). The NHA stated the facility did not have any staff members that had specialized infection control and prevention training and the facility had not had an ICP since November of 2021. The DON stated several staff members quit the facility at the same time and the facility did not have a backup ICP. A review of the facility job description for the title of Staff Development Coordinator/Infection Preventionist Nurse…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2022-03-03 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — pattern
  Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, record reviews, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to provide Pneumococcal vaccinations for three (Resident #26, Resident #23, and Resident #29) of five residents sampled for Pneumococcal vaccinations and failed to provide influenza vaccinations for one (Resident #29) of five residents sampled for influenza vaccinations. Findings included: A request was made on 03/02/2022 to the facility's Director of Nursing (DON) and Infection Control Preventionist (ICP) related to influenza and Pneumococcal vaccination education, consent/refusal, and proof of administration for Residents #26, #23, and #29. The DON provided the following documentation: - Consent and education documentation for Pneumococcal vaccination for Resident #26, dated 11/05/2020. No documentation showing that the vaccination was administered to Resident #26. - Consent and education documentation for Pneumococcal vaccination for Resident #23, dated 12/17/2020. No documentation showing that the vaccination was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to WESTMINSTER COMMUNITIES OF FLORIDA — 9 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 12 rows in the source record cover these 7 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in FL