No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Westminster Winter Park

1111 S Lakemont Ave, Winter Park, FL 32792 · Non profit - Church related · 80 certified beds · (407) 647-4083 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (407) 647-4083 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
1 actual-harm citation$65,683 in federal fines
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

In its favor
  • a strong health-inspection score (4/5) — the hardest rating to game (though it’s ranked within its own state, not nationally)
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (5/5)
  • lower-than-typical staff turnover (26% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has 1 actual-harm citation
  • the CMS record shows $65,683 in federal fines (most recent 2024-06-03)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

5/5
CMS overall
5 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 4 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 5 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
5201 Raymond St · (407) 646-5500 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
5201 Raymond St · (407) 646-4500 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
4825 New Broad St · (407) 789-2313 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
1140 S Lakemont Ave · (407) 644-5060

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 3 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 2 to 5 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating5★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased8.3%8.7%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight3.6%5.5%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.3%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.5%0.7%2.0%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms0.5%4.6%6.5%better
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury0.0%2.5%3.3%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened12.9%9.5%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication2.8%14.4%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%99.2%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers1.3%4.5%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control5.1%10.5%21.2%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table7.4%8.6%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.4%1.5%1.4%typical
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine97.8%94.7%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission25.3%26.1%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit10.2%9.1%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.402.131.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.061.151.80better

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

52.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 122 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

52.4%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
11.8%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
46.0%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.52U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.31hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.21hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
<0.01hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 46.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 87 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.52 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 83% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 14% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF52.4%CMS range 44.8–59.951.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF11.8%CMS range 7.9–17.010.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge46.0%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge62.1%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge40.2%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge97.7%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened1.2%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization8.5%CMS range 5.1–13.27.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.181.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

1.08
RN hours/ resident / day
0.36
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.54
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.98
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.96
RN hoursweekends
25.6%
Total nursing turnover
20.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 80 beds and averages 75.1 residents a day — about 94% occupied, or roughly 5 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.98 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.08 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.54 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.79 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.05 on weekdays — 7% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.13 to 0.96 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 26% is below the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

0
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-07-09)
3
at the previous standard inspection (2024-10-31)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

14 citations, most serious first — scroll within the box to see all.

  • Actual harm · G2024-06-03 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide care and services, according to professional standards of practice, to promote skin integrity and prevent the development and worsening of pressure injuries for 2 of 4 residents reviewed for pressure injuries, out of a total sample of 27 residents, (#5 and #7). The facility's failure to implement preventative interventions and ensure timely and adequate care and treatments for pressure injuries resulted in actual harm, for two dependent residents who were deemed at risk for development of wounds. Resident #5 acquired a pressure injury that was not thoroughly assessed when identified, to determine appropriate approaches to prevent the wound from worsening. Resident #7 developed two pressure injuries, suffered severe wound and bone infections that required hospitalization, and subsequently died on hospice services. Findings: 1. Review of the medical record revealed resident #7, an [AGE] year-old female, was admitted to the facility…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-12 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to administer Oxygen (O2) therapy as ordered by the physician for 2 of 4 residents reviewed for respiratory care, of a total sample of 4 residents, (#3 and #4).1. Resident #3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of pneumonia, acute respiratory failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and congestive heart failure (CHF).Review of resident #3's medical record revealed a care plan revised on 8/07/25 which indicated the resident's oxygen to be applied, as ordered by physician, for respiratory complications related to CHF, COPD, and pneumonia.Supplemental oxygen therapy helps people with COPD, COVID-19, emphysema, sleep apnea and other breathing problems get enough oxygen to function and stay well. Low blood oxygen levels (hypoxemia) can damage organs and be life-threatening, (retrieved on 8/15/25 from www.myclevelandclinic.org).Resident #3's Order Summary Report showed an active physician's order dated 8/4/25 for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-31 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to honor residents' rights to choose their preferred bathing preferences for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for choices, of a total sample of 29 residents, (#55). Findings: Review of the medical record revealed resident #55 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] from the hospital. His diagnosis included Parkinson's disease, osteoarthritis, right hip pain, and bilateral inguinal hernia. Resident #55's admission Minimum Data Set with an assessment reference date of 10/16/24 revealed the resident scored 14 out of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status, indicating he had no cognitive impairment. The MDS assessment also indicated resident #55 was dependent on bathing; it was somewhat important for him to choose between a shower and bed bath, and he participated in the assessment and goal setting. The assessment also revealed the resident did not exhibit behavior symptoms or rejection of care necessary to achieve the resident's goals for health and well-being.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-31 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a written summary of the Baseline Care Plan as required for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for Care Planning, of a total sample of 29 residents, (#869). Findings: Resident #869, an [AGE] year-old female was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included sepsis, atrial fibrillation, hypertension, generalized muscle weakness, hyperlipidemia, and a personal history of pneumonia. On 10/28/24 at 12:20 PM, resident #869 stated she was admitted to the facility for therapy, had been at the facility since 10/24/24, had not had any therapy, and did not know about or have a copy of her care plan. The resident said she did not think she signed anything regarding her plan of care. Review of the resident's clinical records revealed a Baseline Care Plan which indicated resident #869's admission date was 10/24/24. The summary and signatures areas, revealed the document was not signed until 10/28/24 by the resident and the Unit Manager . On 10/29/24 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-31 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident and/or their representative were invited/involved in the development of their care plan for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for care planning, of a total sample of 29 residents, (#38). Findings: Resident #38, an [AGE] year-old female was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included malignant neoplasm of unspecified left bronchus or lung, dementia, diabetes type II, chronic diastolic (congestive) heart failure, chronic atrial fibrillation, hypertension, anxiety disorder and cardiomegaly. Review of the resident's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed the resident's cognition was intact, with a Brief Interview For Mental Status score of 15 out of 15. Section F for preference of the resident's annual MDS dated [DATE] revealed it was very important for the resident to have family/close friend involved in discussion about her care. On 10/28/24 at 4:42 PM, resident #38 stated she had not attended any care…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-06-03 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide sufficient licensed nurses on the 7:00 AM to 3:00 PM shift to meet medication administration needs, according to plans of care for residents on 2 of 2 floors (1st and 2nd floors); and failed to ensure sufficient Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs) to meet person-centered needs for repositioning and incontinence care for 3 of 4 residents reviewed for activities of daily living (ADLs), out of a total sample of 27 residents, (#2, #5, and #7). Findings: 1. On 5/16/24 at 10:27 AM, Registered Nurse (RN) E explained she was administering scheduled 8:00 AM and 9:00 AM medications and still had twelve other residents on her assignment who had not yet received morning medications. She stated her assignment was split between two hallways and the other 1st floor nurse, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) C, had additional residents on the 2nd floor. She explained there were three nurses for both floors. When asked if split assignments across units…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-06-03 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services to ensure timely medication administration in accordance with its policies, procedures and accepted standards of practice for 25 residents reviewed for medication administration, out of a total sample of 27 residents, (#3, #4, #5, #6, #7, #8, #9, #10, #11, #12, #13, #14, #15, #16, #17, #18, #19, #20, #21, #22, #23, #24, #25, #26, and #27). Findings: On 5/16/24 at 10:27 AM, Registered Nurse (RN) E stood at her medication cart on the 1st floor. Her computer screen displayed several residents' profiles in red and she explained the color indicated their scheduled morning medications were now late. RN E stated she had four residents left on one hallway and eight on the back hallways. She confirmed the twelve residents left all had medications scheduled for 8:00 AM and/or 9:00 AM. RN E explained her assignment was split between two hallways and the other 1st floor nurse, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) C's assignment was split between the 1st and 2nd floors. RN E verified late…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-03 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify the physician and/or resident representatives of changes in condition related to development of a pressure ulcer and performance of a surgical procedure for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for pressure injuries, of a total sample of 27 residents, (#5). Findings: Review of the medical record revealed resident #5, a [AGE] year-old female, was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included metabolic encephalopathy (brain disorder), altered mental status, non-traumatic bleeding inside the brain, right carotid artery occlusion, left side weakness and paralysis, and generalized muscle weakness. The Resident Information sheet was updated to show the resident acquired a Stage III pressure ulcer during her stay in the facility. The document indicated resident #5's husband was Power of Attorney (POA) for health care and her daughters were emergency contacts #1 and #2. The National Pressure Injury Advisory Panel (NPIAP)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-03-30 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and policy and quality assurance audits, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety, based on the following: - Clean equipment was not stored in a manner to protect it from contamination. - The dish machine hot water pressure gauge was not reaching 20 PSI (Pounds per Square Inch) pressure, as required, to ensure multi-use equipment was properly washed and sanitized. - Bulk ready-to eat, non-Time/Temperature Control for Safety (TCS) food was not properly labeled to its identity. - Employees were using beverage containers in the kitchen that were not designed to be handled to prevent contamination of the employee's hands and container. - Cold and hot TCS foods were not held at proper temperatures (41 degrees Fahrenheit or less/135 degrees Fahrenheit or more, respectively). - Refrigerated ready-to eat TCS food was not date-marked to indicate when the date the food must be consumed or discarded. These practices have a potential to affect 77 out of 79 resident who…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-03-30 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — widespread
    Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to dispose of the garbage properly in the facility compactor. The facility compactor was used for the entire campus. Findings: A follow up visit to the kitchen was done on 3/29/23 at 10:55 AM with the Dining Service Director, the facility Registered Dietitian, and the Clinical Nutrition Supervisor. A pile of bagged garbage was noted in the dumpster in front of the compactor (transport bin) and the garbage storage bin was not closed or covered. Additionally, there was an open bin of the compactor that had a pile of bagged garbage that was not covered. The surveyor asked the Dining Service Director how often the compactor was operated and he did not know. There were flies flying around the compactor. Photos taken. On 03/29/23 at 10:57 AM, a letter-sized paper between the compactor and the attached dumpster was observed. The paper appeared to be a resident list. Photographic evidence taken. On 03/30/23 at 12:24 PM, the Dining Service Director stated that he talked to maintenance and the employees were supposed to use the compactor…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-03-30 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to provide a homelike environment for all the residents who ate their meals in the first floor dining room (ranging from 11 to 17 residents) at three different meals, by serving the resident's meals on serving trays at the table in an institutional manner. Findings: On 3/27/23 at 11:44 AM, in the first floor main dining room, residents were served from a satellite kitchen with a hot food holding line. When staff assembled the residents' trays, they placed their plates, bowls, cups and eating ware on serving trays. The staff brought the serving trays to the residents' tables and placed them in front of the residents. The staff did not remove the resident's plate and other eating ware from the tray. There were at least 17 residents who had their plates on the serving trays at their tables. During the breakfast meal observation in the first floor dining room on 3/28/23 from 7:39 AM to 8:23 AM, staff served 11 residents their breakfast meals on serving trays and their plates and eating ware were not removed from the trays at the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-03-30 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, staff failed to perform proper hand hygiene during two meals observed in the first floor dining area. Staff failure to do proper hand hygiene has a potential to spread infection to the 11 to 17 residents who ate meals in the first floor dining area. Findings: During the lunch observation on 3/27/23 from 11:44 AM to 12:07 PM, none of the five staff assisting with the meal service performed hand hygiene during that time. These staff were involved with serving resident's food, removing soiled trays, and assisting with feeding residents. During a follow-up meal observation on 3/28/23 at 7:39 AM at breakfast, there were initially three staff who were serving meals and none of them performed hand hygiene. They served trays and one of the staff used a pen to write a resident's menu selection. At 3/28/23 at 7:58 AM, one staff got a banana for a resident and did not perform hand hygiene before or after this task. At 3/28/23 at 7:59 AM, CNA, Staff C fed a resident and left to serve another meal tray. There is a stand hand sanitizer dispenser…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-03-30 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on closed record review and interview, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan for one of one resident, (#82) reviewed for death in the facility. Resident #82 had an identified swallowing problem and the Speech-Language Pathologist had recommended compensatory strategies which were not included in the resident's comprehensive care plan. The resident had a choking incident on 2/10/23, and despite the facility staff and Emergency Medical Services emergency efforts, the resident died. Findings: According to the medical record of Resident #82, he was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and most recently readmitted on [DATE]. The resident died on 2/10/23. Resident #82 had multiple medical diagnoses, including Parkinson's disease; oropharyngeal phase dysphagia (swallowing problem involving the throat and pharynx); elevated blood cholesterol, high blood pressure, hypothyroidism, atherosclerotic heart disease of the native coronary artery without angina pectoris (heart disease in which…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-03-30 · tag F0675 — failed to support quality of life — isolated
    Honor each resident's preferences, choices, values and beliefs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    n observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure 3 residents (#6, #30, and #38) out of 11 to 17 residents eating in the first floor dining room during three different meals, were positioned to maximize eating abilities. Findings: On 3/27/23 at 11:52 AM in the first floor main dining room during the lunch meal, Resident #6 was sitting in a wheelchair at a table and the table was too high. The table top was level with her neck. She was sitting at a table that was lined up with two other tables. On 3/27/23 at 11:53 AM, Resident #30, who was sitting in a wheelchair, was also seated at a table table that was too high for her. The table top was level to her neck. During the breakfast meal observation on 3/28/23 at 8:13 AM in the first floor dining room, Resident #6 was observed sitting at a table that was too high for her. She was sitting in a wheelchair and the table top was level with neck. She was sitting at a table lined up with two other tables. Resident #30 was also sitting at a table too high for her. She was sitting in a wheelchair and the table top was level with neck.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$65,683 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

  • $65,683 — penalty dated 2024-06-03

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to WESTMINSTER COMMUNITIES OF FLORIDA — 9 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 5 of 54.3+0.7 vs chain
Health inspection 4 of 53.7+0.3 vs chain
Staffing 5 of 54.3+0.7 vs chain
Quality measures 4 of 54.8-0.8 vs chain
The other 8 homes this chain runs (chain average 4.3★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
BELL, WILLIAMIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 08/19/2009
DEBEVOISE, JOHNIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2020
DODDRIDGE, DONALDIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2025
DYE, STEPHENIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 08/19/2009
EARLY, MARY ELLENIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2025
HILLENMEYER, JOHNIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 08/19/2009
HULL, WILLIAMIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2024
KUTAC, KRISTINIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2024
MADDUX, CARLENIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2020
MOCK, JEFFREYIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2020
RAMSEY, JOHNIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2020
SHELLEY, LINDAIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2020
FAUBEL, MEGANIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 01/01/2025
HENNIS, GARRYIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 01/01/2025
KEITH, HENRYIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 01/01/1994
WESTMINSTER SERVICES INCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 01/01/1966
KURIAKOSE, JOELIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/14/2025
LEHMAN, GARYIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2025

CMS files one row per role, so the 20 rows in the source record cover these 18 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$10.2M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$3.0M
Related-party expense7% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 48%Medicare 12%Other / private 41%

This home reported $3.0M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$1,479per resident / day
operating cost
$44,963per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$364per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in FL

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Florida Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Florida
$10,342/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$12,167/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,610/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 105879. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-07-09, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next