Westminster Towers

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

66.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 226 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 61.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 96 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.63 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 89% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 44% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 93.4 residents a day — about 78% occupied, or roughly 27 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.70 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.06 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.28 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.40 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.82 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.15 to 0.83 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

22 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 11 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · J2025-03-04 · tag F0678 — failed to provide CPR when needed — isolated
  Provide basic life support, including CPR, prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel , subject to physician orders and the resident’s advance directives.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, licensed nurses failed to follow the facility's policy and procedure for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) related to verification of code status in an emergency for 1 of 13 residents reviewed for advance directives, (#1). On [DATE] at approximately 7:00 PM, resident #1 was observed unresponsive in her bed. Registered Nurse (RN) A took her vitals and notified RN C resident #1 had passed away. RN A failed to verify resident #1's code status and failed to provide CPR per her wishes. Emergency Medical Services was never called. The facility failed to honor the resident's wish to be resuscitated and the physician order for Full Code status. The facility's failure to ensure staff followed procedures related to honoring an advance directive to provide lifesaving measures including CPR for a resident on hospice care contributed to resident #1's death. This action placed all residents who received hospice care at risk of not having their wishes honored. This failure resulted in…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-13 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow physician orders and ensure the comprehensive care plan was implemented for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications and medication regimen, of a total sample of 34 residents, (#43). Findings: Review of resident #43's medical record revealed she was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted from a short-term, acute hospital on 1/13/25. Her diagnoses included atrial fibrillation, hypertension (HTN), type 2 diabetes, and stroke. Review of resident #43's comprehensive care plan with a cardiac focus revised on 3/12/25 revealed potential for altered cardiovascular status. The interventions included, Administer cardiac medications as ordered . Monitor vital signs as ordered. Review of resident #43's medical record revealed a physician order dated 1/13/25 for Hydralazine 100 milligrams (mg) three times a day (TID) for HTN. The order directed the nurses to hold the medication if the systolic blood pressure (SBP) was less…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-13 · tag F0554 — isolated
  Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents' self-administration of medication for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for self-administration of medications, of a total sample of 33 residents, (#57, and #83). 1. Resident #57 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including drug-induced secondary Parkinsonism, bipolar disorder, hypertensive heart disease, and dementia. A review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) quarterly assessment with an assessment reference date of 12/23/24, revealed resident #57 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13/15, indicating he was cognitively intact. On 3/10/25 at 1:58 PM, resident #57 was sitting on the right side of his bed. His nightstand was observed with a one-ounce Neosporin ointment. He stated he used it on the small rash on his right thigh. On 3/10/25 at 2:05 PM, the resident's nightstand was observed by primary Registered Nurse (RN) C. She acknowledged the Neosporin ointment on the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-13 · tag F0655 — isolated
  Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a written summary of the baseline care plan was provided to 1 of 2 residents reviewed for care plans, (#390); and failed to provide a written summary of the baseline care plan within the required time frame for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for care plans, (#546), of a total sample of 34 residents. Findings: 1. Resident #390, a [AGE] year-old male was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His diagnoses included right ankle osteomyelitis, asthma, generalized anxiety disorder, and open wound, right foot. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed the resident's cognition was intact, with a Brief Interview For Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 of 15. On 3/10/25 at 2:46 PM, resident #390 stated he did not recall receiving a written summary of his initial care plan. Review of the resident's Baseline Care Plan Assessment with effective date of 2/23/25, and lock date of 2/24/25, revealed signatures for staff who…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-13 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide showers per resident preference and as scheduled for 1 of 2 resident reviewed for Activities of Daily Living (ADLs), of a total sample of 34 residents, (#75). Findings: Review of resident #75's medical record revealed he was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted from a short-term, acute hospital on [DATE]. His diagnoses included atrial fibrillation, chronic pain syndrome, spinal stenosis (narrowing of the space around the spinal cord or nerves) and fusion of spine. Review of resident #75's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment with Assessment Reference Date of 2/17/25 revealed he had a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 15 out of 15 which indicated intact cognition. The MDS assessment showed resident #75 was dependent on staff for showers/baths and required extensive assistance for personal hygiene. The MDS assessment noted no rejection of care necessary to obtain goals for his health and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-13 · tag F0840 — isolated
  Employ or obtain outside professional resources to provide services in the nursing home when the facility does not employ a qualified professional to furnish a required service.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to obtain an outside eye specialist appointment for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for care coordination, of a total sample of 34 residents, (#45). Findings: Review of resident #45's medical record revealed an admission date of 6/24/22. His diagnoses included quadriplegia unspecified (paralysis), slurred speech, polyneuropathy, and mild vascular dementia with anxiety. His record included that he had no known allergies. His annual Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] indicated his Brief Interview of Mental Status score was 13/15, meaning his cognition was intact. Review of resident #45's medical record revealed a current order that resident #45 may have vision consults as needed for medical necessity with a start date of 6/24/22. Review of resident #45's current medications included artificial tears solution 1% drop in both eyes two times a day for eye irritation, with a start date of 3/06/25. Review of resident #45's January 2025 medication…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-13 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure documentation was accurate and complete for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for accidents, of a total sample of 34 residents, (#55). Findings: Resident #55, a 98- year-old male was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His diagnoses included heart failure, weakness, unsteadiness on feet, difficulty walking, dementia, cardiac pacemaker, and acute embolism and thrombosis of right femoral vein Review of the resident's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed the resident's cognition was moderately impaired with a brief interview for mental status score of 8 of 15, moderate cognitive impairment. The assessment indicated the resident required substantial/maximal assistance for toileting hygiene, and partial/moderate assistance for sit to stand, and for chair/bed-to chair transfer. A care plan for at risk for falls and injuries related to need for physical assistance, and weakness was initiated on 1/13/25. Interventions included,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-08-21 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to report timely an alleged violation of neglect for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for neglect, of a total sample of 3 residents, (#1). Findings: Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease, dementia, abnormalities of gait and mobility and major depressive disorder. Review of the Minimum Data Set admission assessment with assessment reference date of 7/15/24 revealed resident #1 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 10/15 which indicated she had moderate cognitive impairment. The document indicated she used a wander/elopement alarm daily. A care plan for wandering and at risk for elopement was initiated 7/08/24. Interventions included the use of a wander/elopement alarm daily. Review of resident #1's progress notes for the month of August 2024 revealed she was unable to be located on the morning of 8/07/24 during rounds by the 7:00 AM - 3:00 PM nurse. A facility search was initiated. The facility…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-21 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision to prevent elopement for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for actual elopement, of a total sample of 3 residents reviewed for elopement, (#1). Findings: Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease, dementia, abnormalities of gait and mobility and major depressive disorder. Review of the Minimum Data Set admission assessment with assessment reference date of 7/15/24 revealed resident #1 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 10/15 which indicated she had moderate cognitive impairment but did not exhibit disorganized thinking. The document indicated she used a walker for independent mobility and did not have any impairment to her upper or lower extremities. The assessment revealed resident #1 wore a wander/elopement alarm daily. Review of the medical record revealed an elopement evaluation dated 7/05/24. The evaluation indicated resident #1 wandered and had a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-14 · tag F0554 — isolated
  Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a physician's order was obtained for medications at bedside for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for pressure ulcer care, of a total sample of 8 residents, (#2). Findings: Resident #2, an [AGE] year-old male was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His diagnoses included cellulitis to his right lower limb, diabetes type II, lymphedema, anxiety disorder, and stage III pressure ulcer to his right and left buttocks. Review of the resident's Minimum Data Set (MDS) admission assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident's cognition was intact with a Brief Interview For Mental Status score of 14 out of 15. The assessment revealed the resident had impairment in functional limitation in range of motion on both sides of his upper and lower extremities. On 5/13/24 at 10:32 AM, resident #2 was sitting in his wheelchair in his room to the right of his bed. His tray table was positioned in front of him, and a tube of Ammonium lactate 12% cream, and a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-05-14 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure wound care for pressure ulcers was completed per physician's orders for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for pressure ulcers, of a total sample of 8 residents, (#1, and #2). Findings: 1. Resident #1, a [AGE] year-old male was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His diagnoses included malignant neoplasm of tongue, gastrostomy, and pneumonia. Review of the Medical Certification For Medicaid Long-Term Care Services and Patient Transfer Form (3008) dated 1/02/24 revealed the resident had an unstageable pressure ulcer to his sacrum, and pressure ulcers to his left and right ischium, stages were not documented. Documentation on the Wound Physicians wound evaluation and summary management dated 3/14/24 revealed the resident had a stage IV pressure wound to his coccyx which measured 3.3 x 2.3 x 1.2 centimeters(cm) with undermining of 3.5 cm at 12 o'clock position. The dressing treatment plan was Gentamicin ¼ strength Dakins solution, Santyl, and gauze roll…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$22,133 in federal fines across 2 penalties.

• $5,980 — penalty dated 2025-03-04
• $16,153 — penalty dated 2025-03-04

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to WESTMINSTER COMMUNITIES OF FLORIDA — 9 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 13 rows in the source record cover these 10 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $2.6M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in FL