Westminster Suncoast

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

56.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 328 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 43.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 174 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.50 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 81% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 18% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 88.8 residents a day — about 74% occupied, or roughly 31 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.67 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.83 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.21 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.33 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.81 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.92 to 0.59 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 35% is below the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

21 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 11 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · E2026-02-25 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews, observations, and interviews the facility failed to ensure wound care was completed as ordered for two (#1 and #6) of three residents sampled for the treatment of non-pressure wounds, failed to ensure accurate and timely assessments were completed for two (#5 and #6) of three residents sampled for skin assessments. Findings included:1.Review of Resident #1's admission Record showed the resident was admitted on [DATE] and included diagnoses not limited to metabolic encephalopathy, repeated falls, and unspecified dementia unspecified severity without behavioral disturbance, psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance, and anxiety. The resident was discharged to an acute care hospital on 6/21/25. Review of Resident #1's progress notes revealed a change in condition on 6/6/25. The note revealed the resident had a skin tear, neuro (checks) and fall protocol were implemented as staff had assisted resident up. Review of Resident #1's Treatment Administration Record (TAR) showed an order…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-25 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interviews the facility failed to provide the services ordered by a physician for one (#1) of three residents sampled for treatment of a non-pressure wound. The facility falsified documentation showing wound care had been completed during that time and failed to recognize wound care had not been completed for 8 days during a weekly skin assessment.Findings included: Review of Resident #1's admission Record showed the resident was admitted on [DATE] and included diagnoses not limited to metabolic encephalopathy, repeated falls, and unspecified dementia unspecified severity without behavioral disturbance, psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance, and anxiety. The resident was discharged to an acute care hospital on 6/21/25. Review of Resident #1's progress notes revealed a change in condition on 6/6/25. The note revealed the resident had a skin tear, neuro (checks) and fall protocol were implemented as staff had assisted resident up. Review of Resident #1's Fall Risk Evaluation, dated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-25 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review the facility failed to ensure medications were stored securely and not accessible by unauthorized staff, visitors, and residents related to:1. medications left unattended on a medication cart on two (300/400) of three units; 2. medications left unattended in a resident's room for one resident (#7) who was not assessed to self-administer medications out of one resident sampled for self administration of medications.Findings included: 1. An observation on 2/25/26 at 8:05 a.m. showed a bag of Vancomycin 1 gram/200 milliliter (mL) sitting on top of an unattended medication cart parked outside of residents rooms on the 400 hall. The observation showed Staff A, Registered Nurse (RN) was in a resident room on the 300 hall. The staff member returned to the medication cart and reported the medication should not have been left on top of the cart. During an interview on 2/26/26 at 2:09 p.m. the Director of Nursing stated medications should not be left unattended on the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-25 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to maintain medical records with accurate documentation for one resident (#4) of three residents reviewed for incontinence care. Findings include:A review of Resident #4's admission record revealed an initial admission date of 8/7/25, with diagnoses to include need for assistance with personal care, difficulty in walking, speech and language deficits following unspecified cerebrovascular disease, and major depressive disorder, recurrent, moderate.A review of Resident #4's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 5/22/25 in Section C - cognitive patterns revealed a Brief Interview Mental Score (BIMS) of 9, indicating moderately impaired cognition.A review of Resident #4's Bowel and Bladder tasks revealed incontinent care was not provided on 8/28/25 for the 3-11 shift, 9/8/25 for the 7-3 shift, 9/11/25 for the 11-7 shift, 9/12/25 for the 3-11 shift, 9/30/25 for the 11-7 shift, and 10/5/25 for the 3-11 shift for Resident #4.On 2/25/26 at 2:45 p.m. an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) revealed none of the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-25 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews the facility failed to implement an effective infection control program related to ensuring staff members donned appropriate Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) to prevent the transmission of communicable conditions for two (#9 and #10) of five residents with physician orders for contact precautions.On 2/25/26 at 7:39 a.m. an observation showed Staff C, Certified Nursing Assistant CNA) dressed in wine-colored scrubs standing in front of Resident #9 (sitting in wheelchair) and speaking with the resident. The staff member left the room. Staff B, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) confirmed a Contact Precautions sign was posted on the resident's door and no Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) was available at the doorway. Review of the Contact Precaution sign posted on Resident #9's door Instructed, STOP CONTACT PRECAUTIONS EVERYONE MUST: Clean their hands, including before entering and when leaving the room. PROVIDERS AND STAFF MUST ALSO: Put on gloves before room…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-12 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to protect the rights of one (#6) of one resident related to the physical abuse from a staff member. Findings included: On 9/23/24 at 10:15 a.m., Resident #6 was observed sitting in a specialized wheelchair in her room. The resident reported mistreatment considering how she was treated and informed writer you're probably the worst one. The resident would not explain the statement related to mistreatment stating, it's over and done with hopefully. The resident reported being blind. Review of Resident #6's admission Record revealed the resident had diagnoses not limited to unspecified cerebral infarction, unspecified severity unspecified dementia without behavioral disturbance, psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance, and anxiety, recurrent moderate major depressive disorder, and adjustment disorder with other symptoms. Review of Resident #6's progress notes revealed the following: - Late Entry behavior note, dated 9/16/24 at 1:51 p.m. and effective 9/14/24 at 1:49 p.m., Resident sliding out of chair, staff…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-11-12 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to report an alleged violation involving abuse immediately or no later than 2 hours for one (#6) out of eight sampled allegations of abuse. . Findings included: On 9/23/24 at 10:15 a.m., Resident #6 was observed sitting in a specialized wheelchair in her room. The resident reported mistreatment considering how she was treated and informed writer you're probably the worst one. The resident would not explain the statement related to mistreatment stating, it's over and done with hopefully. The resident reported being blind. Review of Resident #6's admission Record revealed the resident had diagnoses not limited to unspecified cerebral infarction, unspecified severity unspecified dementia without behavioral disturbance, psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance, and anxiety, recurrent moderate major depressive disorder, and adjustment disorder with other symptoms. Review of Resident #6's progress notes revealed the following: - Late Entry behavior note, dated 9/16/24 at 1:51 p.m. and effective 9/14/24 at 1:49 p.m.,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-04-25 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure an accurate care plan was in place related to Advanced Directives for one resident (#101) out of 40 sampled residents. Findings included: Review of Resident #101's admission Record revealed he was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted to the facility on [DATE] from an acute care hospital. His diagnoses included dysphagia following unspecified cerebrovascular disease, muscle weakness, abnormalities of gait and mobility, repeated falls, and speech/language deficits following a cerebrovascular disease. A review of Resident #101's physician orders revealed an order, dated 4/21/24, for Do Not Resuscitate (DNR). Review of Resident #101's medical record revealed a State of Florida's Do Not Resuscitate Order, dated 3/29/24, completed by Resident #101's Durable Power of Attorney (POA) and signed by the physician on 3/30/24. Review of Resident #101's care plan, dated 4/5/24, revealed the following: Residents Advanced Directives have…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-04-25 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure pressure relieving boots were applied to prevent the worsening of a pressure wound for one resident (#101) out of one resident sampled for pressure wounds. Findings included: Review of Resident #101's admission Record revealed he was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted to the facility on [DATE] from an acute care hospital. His diagnoses included dysphagia following unspecified cerebrovascular disease, muscle weakness, abnormalities of gait and mobility, repeated falls, speech and language deficits following a cerebrovascular disease. An observation was conducted on 04/22/24 at 10:16 AM. Resident #101 was observed to be in bed eyes closed, feet resting on the mattress, with his green air boots on the chair next to his bed, not in use. An observation was conducted on 4/23/24 at 10:41 AM. Resident #101 was observed to be lying on his right side, in bed, with the sides of both feet resting on the air mattress,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-04-25 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to ensure identification and monitoring of a BIPAP (Biphasic positive airway pressure) machine was in place for one resident (#6) out of one resident sampled. Findings included: A review of Resident #6's admission Record revealed he was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted from an acute care hospital on 4/18/24. His medical diagnoses included encounter for surgical aftercare following surgery on the digestive system, muscle weakness, abnormalities of gait and mobility, repeated falls, heart failure, and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus without complications. An interview and observation was conducted on 04/22/24 at 10:10 AM. Resident #6 was observed to be lying in bed with his BIPAP mask on. He said he brought the BIPAP machine from home and he puts it on himself. He was observed to remove the BIPAP from his face and place it on his over bed table. Review of Resident #6's medical record on 4/22/24 at 11:15 p.m. did not reveal…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to WESTMINSTER COMMUNITIES OF FLORIDA — 9 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 10 rows in the source record cover these 7 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $2.5M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in FL