St. Andrew Post-Acute Rehabilitation Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

44.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 138 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 50.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 64 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.60 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 88% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 2% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 45 beds and averages 35.4 residents a day — about 79% occupied, or roughly 10 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.67 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.89 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.68 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.55 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.72 on weekdays — 3% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.90 to 0.87 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 42% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

20 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 10 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · F2024-09-05 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare and follow professional standards for food service safety in two (main and satellite) of two kitchens, as evidenced by: 1. two trash cans were not sanitarily maintained; 2. food was not maintained for safe consumption to include improper food handling practices; 3. kitchen shelving used for storage of food was observed rusted/oxidized, 4. temperature logs for the refrigerator and freezer were not documented accurately, and 5. one staff member (Q) not donning a hairnet upon entry to the kitchen during two (9/3/24 and 9/5/24) of three days of the survey. Findings included: On 9/3/24 at 9:20 a.m. a tour of the facility's main kitchen was conducted with Staff M, Certified Dietary Manager (CDM). From 9:24 a.m. to 9:38 a.m. observations of trash cans and refuse containers revealed a stand-up trash container with a double flap lid was open with trash/refuse overflowing from it. The trash container was against a food preparation/service table, where were observed preparing food on the stove. The lid…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-09-05 · tag F0645 — pattern
  PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 4. On 9/3/2024 at 10:00 a.m. Resident #15 was heard yelling out and moaning aloud from behind her closed room door. During an interview at this time, the resident stopped yelling aloud and revealed she wanted staff to come and take her to the shower. Review of Resident #15's admission Record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the admission Record revealed Resident #15's diagnoses to include altered mental status, cognitive communication deficit, dementia, major depression, mood disorder, and schizoaffective disorder. In addition, the medical chart contained a Level 1 PASRR. Further review of the Level I PASRR revealed the MI, Suspected MI Section I (a) showed Resident #15 was checked for diagnoses to include bipolar and schizophrenia. However, major depression was not checked. On 9/5/24 at 10:00 a.m. an interview with the SSD confirmed the current completed Level I PASSR screen did not reflect all the MI, Suspected MI diagnoses. She revealed Resident #15 did show a diagnosis of major…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-09-05 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 3. On 9/3/2024 at 11:08 a.m. an observation of Resident #28 revealed he was laying down in bed, with the bedsheets pulled to slightly over his waist, and his hands were over the bedsheets. An observation of his hands revealed long fingernails. Observations of his right hand revealed his ring fingernail was splitting horizontally, in the middle of his nail bed. The ring fingernail on his right hand was lifted up from splitting. An observation of Resident #28's left hand revealed his thumb nail was jagged and splitting horizontally from about half of the nail. On 9/4/2024 at 1:24 p.m. Resident #28 was observed sitting in a wheelchair with the bedside table in front of him. Resident #28's family member was observed sitting on the bed beside him. An observation of his hands revealed long fingernails. Observations of his right hand revealed his ring fingernail was splitting horizontally, in the middle of his nail bed. The ring fingernail on his right hand was lifted up from splitting. An observation of Resident #28's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-09-05 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews and record review the facility failed to implement and maintain an infection prevention and control program to mitigate the spread of infection related to staff not offering hand hygiene to residents prior to a meal and two staff members (R, and G) not performing hand hygiene with the potential to affect a census of 41 residents. Findings included: On 9/3/24 observations of the lunch service in the dining room from 11:51 a.m. to 12:55 p.m. revealed no hand hygiene was offered to multiple residents prior to eating. At 12:01 p.m. Staff E, Registered Nurse (RN) entered the dining room area. At 12:27 p.m. an observation of Staff E, RN revealed she sat down and attempted to assist a resident by setting them up to eat, which included touching utensils and other items on the table and did not perform hand hygiene prior to assisting this resident. At 12:33 p.m. Staff E, RN was observed serving beverages without performing hand hygiene before and after handling the beverages. At 12:38 p.m. an observation of Staff E, RN revealed she was feeding Resident #10,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-09-05 · tag F0694 — isolated
  Provide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to provide administration of intravenous medication in accordance with professional standards of practices for one resident (#11) of four residents sampled. Findings included: On 9/3/2024 at 9:55 a.m. a loud alarm sound was overheard close to the nurse station area. The alarm sound was observed to be emitting from an Intravenous (IV) therapy system pump, which was at Resident #11's bedside down the hallway. At this time, Resident #11 was observed lying flat in bed and with his head propped up on a pillow. Resident #11 stated, The [explicative] thing goes on all the time. He stated the IV system provided an antibiotic to heal a wound infection, and he could not remember exactly how long he has been treated with IV antibiotic therapy. Resident #11 stated the IV machine must have problems to alarm that way. He stated, They [staff] take a long time [to respond]; it happens enough. Further observations, at this time, of the alarming IV therapy…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-05 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews the facility failed to monitor the oxygen saturation level for one resident (#9) of one resident sampled for respiratory care. Findings included: On 9/3/24 at 12:25 p.m. Resident #9 was observed lying in bed with eyes closed. An oxygen concentrator was sitting on the floor next to the bedside dresser. Review of Resident #9's admission Record revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE] and 10/1/19. The record included diagnoses not limited to unspecified severity unspecified dementia without behavioral disturbance, psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance, and anxiety, shortness of breath, and unspecified organism other pneumonia. Review of Resident #9's Minimum Data Set assessment, dated 6/16/24, revealed in Section C - Cognitive Patterns the resident was rarely/never understood and had a no score for the Brief Interview for Mental Status. Review of Resident #9's September 2024 Medication Administration Record (MAR) revealed a physician order for Resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-05 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
  Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews the facility failed to ensure the medication error rate was less than 5.00%. Thirty-six medication administration opportunities were observed and nine errors were identified for two (#27 and #7) of three residents observed. These errors constituted a 25% medication error rate. Findings included: 1. On 9/4/24 at 8:04 a.m. an observation of medication administration with Staff D, Registered Nurse (RN) was conducted with Resident #27. The staff member dispensed the following medications: - Acidophilus lactobacillus otc (over-the-counter) capsule - Amlodipine 10 mg (milligram) tablet - Biotin 1000 mcg (microgram) otc tablet - Loratadine 10 mg otc tablet - Cranberry 2- 450 mg otc tablets - Doxycycline 50 mg capsule - Methenam hiprex 1 gram tablet - Montelukast 10 mg tablet - Valsartan 40 mg tablet - Amoxicillin/Potassium clavulanic 875-125 mg tablet - Tamsulosin 0.4 mg capsule - Lactulose 10 gram/15 milliliter (gm/mL) - 30 mLs. Staff D, RN searched through multiple bottles in the medication cart and reported having to reorder Resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-09-09 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — pattern
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure respiratory care and services were provided according to professional standards of practice for three (#19, 28, 146) out of four residents sampled. Findings Included: 1. On 09/06/22 at 12:33 p.m. Resident #19 was observed sitting in her wheelchair in her bedroom, and smiled when approached. Resident #19 stated I can't leave my room as she pointed to her nose that contained oxygen tubing. The tubing was attached to concentrator, which was turned on and registered at 2 liters. The tubing reflected the date 08/24/2022. Additionally on the bedside table a small volume nebulizer machine was observed with the tubing and mask dated 08/24/2020. The nebulizer aerosol mask was lying on top of a gait belt and not stored in a clean manner (photographic evidence obtained). On 09/07/22 at 11: 00 a.m. Resident #19 was observed sitting up in her wheelchair with nasal cannula in place and attached to the concentrator running at 2 liters. On…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-09-09 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — pattern
  Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the medication error rate was less than 5.00%. Thirty-one medication administration opportunities were observed, and seven errors were identified for five (#8, 6, 24, 30 and 9) of six residents observed. These errors constituted a 22.58% medication error rate Findings Included: 1. On 09/08/2022 at 9:15 a.m. medication observed task was conducted alongside Staff Member D, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) as she prepared medications for Resident #8. She confirmed the medications that were prepared was all that was due at that time except the Medrol dose pack. She said it was not available to be given. She stated when the order was put in the medication administration record it was not transcribed accurately. Staff L confirmed the order was dated on 09/07/2022 and the order still needed to be clarified before it could be administered. 2. On 09/08/2022 at 9:41 a.m. Staff D prepared the following medications for Resident #6 Ibuprofen tablet 200 mg (milligrams) three tablets, carbidopa-levodopa 25 -100 mg,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2022-09-09 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the Physician was informed of medication refusal over a period of 12 days (08/22/22, 08/23/22, 08/29/22, 08/30/22, 08/31/22, 09/01/22, 09/02/22, 09/03/22, 09/04/22, 09/05/22, 09/06/22, 09/07/22) days for one (#346) of five sampled residents. Findings included: During the medical record review for Resident#346 revealed that she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnosis but not limited to unspecified fracture of left femur, subsequent encounter for closed fracture with routine healing, Depression, Hyperlipidemia, enterocolitis due to clostridium difficile and anxiety. Review of Resident#346 cognitive status on the most current Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 2, indicating severely impaired. Review of the MAR (medication administration record) revealed the resident had refused several medications and the physician was not notified. Medications included but not limited…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to PLAINVIEW HEALTHCARE PARTNERS — 9 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 11 rows in the source record cover these 7 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $283K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in FL