Newport Tn Opco LLC

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

54.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 81 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 30.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 43 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.30 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 47% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 10% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 150 beds and averages 90.4 residents a day — about 60% occupied, or roughly 60 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.28 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.34 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.85 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.09 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.36 on weekdays — 8% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.32 to 0.41 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 57% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

17 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 5 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2021-06-08 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, medical record review and interview, the facility failed to follow the Comprehensive Care Plan for 1 resident (Resident #259) of 4 residents to ensure a safe transfer with a mechanical lift. The facility's failure resulted in a fracture of the resident's proximal left tibia (upper part of the shin bone) and Harm for Resident #259. The findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Comprehensive Care Plan revised May 2021, showed .The plan must address the resident's individual needs, strengths, and preferences .The Comprehensive Care Plan planning process includes: .Incorporation of the resident's personal .preferences .The care plan is reviewed on an ongoing basis and revised as indicated by the resident's needs .At a minimum, the care plan is updated with each comprehensive and quarterly assessment . Medical record review showed Resident #259 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Muscle Weakness, Anxiety Disorder, Edema, Epilepsy, Chronic Pain,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Actual harm · Gcited before2021-06-08 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, medical record review and interview, the facility failed to prevent accidents for 1 resident (Resident #259) of 4 residents reviewed for accidents. The facility failed to transfer Resident #259 with the care planned intervention for transfer. The facility's failure resulted in a fracture of the resident's proximal left tibia (upper part of the shin bone) and Harm for Resident #259. The findings include: Review of the facility policy titled LIFT, TRANSFER, AND REPOSITIONING POLICY dated 2010, showed .The IDT [Interdisciplinary Team] will use the Company Lift and Transfer Guide .to develop care plan interventions that will continue to focus on ensuring the residents attain and maintain their highest level of physical functioning .Residents identified as partial weight-bearing or non-weight bearing and needing assistance with lifts and transfers shall be lifted using an appropriate mechanical lift .Direct care staff will be responsible for the following .Lifting and transferring…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · E2025-08-20 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to maintain a safe, clean, homelike environment for 15 resident rooms (#213, #217, #223, #211, #103, #124, #127, #219, #119, #310, #312, #115, #125, #224, and #210) of 68 resident rooms observed, 3 of 5 hallways observed, and 1 of 1 activity rooms observed. The findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Resident Environmental Quality, undated, revealed .It is the policy of this facility to be .maintained to provide a safe .sanitary and comfortable environment for residents .and the public . During an observation on 8/18/2025 at 10:00 AM, revealed the floor of the 200 hallway was unclean and had a dirty residue. During an observation on 8/18/2025 at 10:13 AM, revealed the floor of the 300 hallway was unclean and had a dirty residue. During an observation on 8/18/2025 at 10:21 AM, revealed the floor of the 100 hallway was unclean and had a dirty residue. During an observation on 8/18/2025 at 11:50 AM, revealed 3…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-20 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) manual review, medical record review, and interview, the facility failed to accurately complete a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for 1 resident (Resident #53) of 24 residents reviewed. The findings include:Review of the MDS 3.0 RAI Manual version 19.1 dated 10/2024, revealed . J1800 .Any Falls Since Admission/Entry or Reentry or Prior Assessment .Code 1, yes: if the resident has fallen since the last assessment .Review of the medical record revealed Resident #53 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Dementia, Diabetes, and Hypothyroidism.Review of the Nurse Note for Resident #53 dated 4/14/2025, revealed .Resident found on floor .doorway .Resident sitting on her bottom .Review of a quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE], revealed Resident #53 scored a 3 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) assessment which indicated the resident had severe cognitive impairment. Further record review revealed Resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-20 · tag F0644 — isolated
  Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, medical record review, and interview, the facility failed to resubmit a Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) timely after a new mental health diagnosis for 1 resident (Resident #25) of 5 residents reviewed for PASARR. The findings include:Review of the facility's policy titled, Coordination with PASARR Program, undated, revealed .This facility coordinates assessments with the .(PASARR) program .to ensure that individuals with a mental disorder, intellectual disability, or a related condition receives care and services .appropriate to their needs .any level II resident who experiences a significant change in status will be referred promptly to the mental health or intellectual disability authority for additional resident review .Review of a PASARR Level 1 screen for Resident #25 dated 8/31/2023, revealed the resident had a mental health diagnosis of Depression (mild or situational).Review of the medical record revealed Resident #25 was admitted to the facility on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-20 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, medical record review, observation and interview, the facility failed to revise the care plan for 2 residents (Resident #53 and #11) of 24 residents reviewed for care plans. The findings include: Review of the facility's undated policy titled, Care Plan Revision guidelines, revealed .The purpose .provide consistent process .for reviewing and revising the care plan .residents experiencing a .change .A resident's .care plan will be reviewed and revised as necessary . Review of the facility's undated policy titled, Fall Prevention & Management Program guideline, undated, revealed .high fall risk identified .facility will develop plan of care .plan of care will be revised as needed . Review of the medical record revealed Resident #53 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Dementia, Diabetes, and Hypothyroidism. Review of a quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed Resident #53 scored a 3 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS)…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-20 · tag F0813 — isolated
  Have a policy regarding use and storage of foods brought to residents by family and other visitors.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to meet safety and sanitation requirements for 2 residents (Resident #60 and #74) personal refrigerators of 5 resident personal refrigerators observed.The findings include: Review of the facility's undated policy titled, Refrigerators in the Residents' Rooms, revealed .The Administrator will designate the staff who will be responsible for cleaning the refrigerator weekly and discard any foods that are out of compliance .Foods with use-by dates shall be discarded accordingly . Review of the medical record revealed Resident #60 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Type 2 Diabetes, Malnutrition, Major Depressive Disorder, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) and Muscle Weakness. Review of a quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed Resident #60 scored an 11 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) assessment which indicated the resident had moderate cognitive…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-20 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on facility policy review, observation, and interviews, the facility failed to follow infection control practices during 1 of 2 medication administration observations.The findings include: Review of the facility's undated policy titled, Medication Administration Policy and Procedure, revealed .Perform hand hygiene . During an observation of medication administration on 8/19/2025 at 8:00 AM, revealed Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) A prepared medications for Resident #42, entered the resident's room, administered the medication, and exited the room without washing or sanitizing the hands. LPN A returned to the medication cart, prepared medications for Resident #63 entered the resident's room, handed the resident a plastic cup of medications, and the resident dropped an over the counter (otc) pain medication on the floor. LPN A picked up the medication, placed the medication in a plastic cup, ensured all the resident's other medications were administered, exited the room, and discarded the medication without washing or sanitizing the hands. Further observation revealed LPN A…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2024-06-26 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespread
  Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on facility policy review, facility document review, and interview, the facility failed to provide the services of a Registered Nurse (RN) for the minimum requirement of 8 hours a day for 1 day (6/23/2024) of 32 days reviewed between the period of 5/23/2024 and 6/23/2024. The findings include: Review of the facility's undated policy titled, Nursing Services and Sufficient Staff, revealed .The facility will provide sufficient staff with appropriate competencies and skill sets to assure resident safety and attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental and psychosocial well-being of each resident .the facility must use the services of a registered nurse for at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week . Review of the facility document titled, Daily Staffing Form, dated 6/23/2024, revealed no RN was on duty working in the facility. During an interview on 6/26/2024 at 9:15 AM, The Administrator confirmed the facility failed to provide the minimum requirement of 8 hours RN coverage on 6/23/2024.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2024-06-26 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — widespread
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on facility policy review, observations, and interviews the facility failed to ensure expired supplies were not available for resident use in 2 of 2 medication rooms observed. The findings include: Review of the facility's undated policy titled, Medical Products & Supplies Use and Storage, revealed .The facility will follow manufacturers' guidelines when using medical devices .which includes syringes, tubes .expired item will not be used . During an observation and interview in the east medication room on 6/26/2024 at 3:49 PM, with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) A and LPN B revealed 25- 3 mL (milliliter) blue top blood collection tubes with an expiration date of 3/31/2024. LPN A and LPN B stated the facility occasionally collected blood specimens. LPN A and LPN B confirmed the 25- 3 mL blue top blood collection tubes were expired and available for resident use. During an observation and interview in the west medication room on 6/26/2024 at 4:02 PM, with LPN C, revealed 10- 28 gauge (ga) x (by) ½ inch (in) syringes with an expiration date of 11/30/2023, and 77- 28 ga x ½ in…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-26 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, medical record review, observations, and interviews the facility failed to develop a person-centered care plan related to smoking for 1 resident (Resident #71) of 3 residents reviewed for smoking. The findings include: Review of the facility's undated policy titled, Comprehensive Care Plans, revealed .It is the policy of this facility to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with .needs that are identified .The care planning process will include .Services provided or arranged by the facility .the comprehensive care plan will describe at minimum .The services that are to be furnished .Resident specific interventions that reflect the resident's needs and preferences . Review of the medical record revealed Resident #71 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Infection of the Left Lower Leg, Kidney Failure, and Heart Attack. Review of a quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-26 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, medical record review, observations, and interviews the facility failed to assess 1 resident (Resident #71) for smoking of 3 residents reviewed for smoking. The findings include: Review of the facility's undated policy titled Smoking Procedures for Residents, revealed .Residents who desire to smoke will be assessed for safety with smoking materials upon admission or initially request to smoke as well as on a quarterly basis . Review of the medical record revealed Resident #71 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Infection of the Left Lower Leg, Kidney Failure, and Heart Attack. Review of a quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed Resident #71 scored a 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) assessment which indicated the resident was cognitively intact. Record review of Resident #71's assessments revealed the resident was not assessed for smoking. During an observation at the east hall smoking area on 6/25/2024 at…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to PLAINVIEW HEALTHCARE PARTNERS — 9 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 5 rows in the source record cover these 4 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $412K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in TN