Huntsville Post-Acute And Rehabilitation Center
287 Baker Street, Huntsville, TN 37756 · For profit - Corporation · 96 certified beds · (423) 663-3600 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- inspectors cited 3 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
- inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (28) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $9,062 in federal fines (most recent 2024-05-03)
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
- its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)
- nursing-staff turnover (61%) runs well above the national median (45%)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 2 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 2 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 2 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 1 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 2 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 25.5% | 14.0% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 4.6% | 6.1% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.5% | 0.7% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.0% | 1.8% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 0.4% | 13.8% | 6.5% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 5.9% | 3.4% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 27.9% | 17.2% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 27.2% | 31.7% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 89.0% | 94.5% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 14.8% | 5.0% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 12.3% | 20.0% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 18.4% | 16.8% | 17.1% | typical |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 1.4% | 1.7% | 1.4% | typical |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 38.0% | 79.8% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 17.3% | 22.6% | 22.6% | better |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 10.4% | 11.2% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.81 | 1.67 | 1.67 | typical |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 2.65 | 1.56 | 1.80 | worse |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
Met the expected recovery: 41.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 29 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.30 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 47% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 8% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 11.5%CMS range 7.1–18.2 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 41.4% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 31.0% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 37.9% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 92.5% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 2.5% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 15.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 7.1%CMS range 4.3–15.0 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.18 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 96 beds and averages 80.9 residents a day — about 84% occupied, or roughly 15 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.36 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.44 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.09 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.06 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.49 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.55 to 0.19 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 61% is well above the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
28 citations, most serious first. The 14 most serious are shown; the remaining 14 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · J2024-05-03 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, medical record review, facility documentation, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan and implement appropriate interventions for 1 resident (Resident #10), to prevent hoarding of medications, and failed to implement appropriate interventions to alert staff 1 Resident (Resident #10) was ordering and receiving over the counter medications online. The facility's failure to develop a comprehensive care plan and implement appropriate interventions placed Resident #10 and all other residents in the facility in an Immediate Jeopardy situation, (a condition in which facility noncompliance with one or more conditions of participation has resulted in or is likely to result in serious injury, harm, impairment, or death and must be immediately corrected). The facility's failure to develop a comprehensive care plan and implement appropriate interventions had the potential to impact all residents in the facility. The Facility Administrator…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-05-03 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, facility documentation review, observation, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure adequate supervision during medication administration to prevent 1 resident (Resident #10) from hoarding medications and the facility failed to adequately address 1 resident's (Resident #10) ordering and accumulating over the counter medications and supplements from outside sources for self-administration. The facility's failure to ensure adequate supervision during medication administration placed Resident #10 and all other residents in the facility in an Immediate Jeopardy situation, (A condition in which facility noncompliance with one or more conditions of participation has resulted in or is likely to result in serious injury, harm, impairment, or death and must be immediately corrected). The facility's failure to ensure adequate supervision during medication administration had the potential to impact all residents in the facility. On 4/15/2024, the facility census was 70. The Facility…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-05-03 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, medical record review, facility documentation, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to provide a complete and accurate record of Resident #10's medication administration. The facility's medication nurses failed to ensure Resident #10 swallowed all medications when administered. This failure resulted in Resident #10's Medication Administration Record (MAR) documenting medications administered that were not taken by Resident #10 and subsequently hoarded by the resident. This failure placed Resident #10 and all other residents in the facility, in an Immediate Jeopardy situation (A condition in which facility noncompliance with one or more conditions of participation has resulted in or is likely to result in serious injury, harm, impairment, or death and must be immediately corrected). The facility's failure to observe and document accurate medication administration had the potential to impact all residents in the facility. On 4/15/2024, the facility census was 70.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2021-11-04 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, review of facility job descriptions, review of manufacturer's instructions, medical record review, review of facility investigation documentation, and interviews, the facility failed to provide a safe transfer to prevent an avoidable accident resulting in a concussion for 1 resident (Resident #64) of 3 residents reviewed for accidents. The facility's failure to provide safe transfer techniques resulted in Harm to Resident #64. The facility was cited as past noncompliance and the facility is not required to submit a Plan of Correction for F-689. The findings include: Review of the facility's undated policy titled, On-the Job Training, showed .On-the-job training is provided to train each employee in his/her respective job assignment and our methods of performing such tasks . Review of the facility's undated policy titled, Policy and Procedure Securing Wheelchair Resident On Transportation Van, showed .In the event that incident/accident should occur during van transportation,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-11-19 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) Manual review, facility policy review, medical record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure MDS assessments were accurate for 3 residents (Resident #21, #31, and #66) of 20 residents reviewed for MDS assessments. The findings include:Review of the MDS 3.0 RAI Manual Version 19.1, dated 10/2024, revealed .Health-related Quality of Life .residents covered by Level II PASRR [Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review] process may require certain care and services provided by the nursing home .Steps for Assessment .Code .yes .if PASRR Level II screening determined that the resident has a serious mental illness . Review of the medical record revealed Resident #21 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Schizophrenia and Major Depressive Disorder. Review of a PASRR Level II Outcome for Resident #21 dated 2/14/2025, revealed .a level II PASRR evaluation and the Department of Mental Health and Substance Abuse…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-11-19 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, medical record review, facility investigation review, and interview, the facility failed to revise a care plan to include a fall intervention for 1 resident (Resident #2) of 4 care plans reviewed for falls. The findings include:Review of the facility policy titled, Comprehensive Care Plan, undated, revealed .facility will develop and implement a person-centered care plan for each resident, that includes measurable objectives and time frames to meet resident's medical, nursing, mental, and psychosocial needs .maintains a comprehensive care plan participate in the development of .revising of the Comprehensive Care Plan .Review of the facility policy titled, Fall Prevention & Management, undated, revealed .when any resident experiences a fall, the facility will .Review the resident's care plan and update as indicated .Review of the medical record revealed Resident #2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Hypertension, Congestive Heart Failure, Osteopenia,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-11-19 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on facility policy review, review of manufacturer guidelines, observation, and interview the facility failed to store 4 insulin pens appropriately on 1 medication cart of 3 medication carts observed for medication storage.The findings include:Review of the facility's policy titled, Medication & Biologicals Storage guidelines, undated, revealed .Medications will be stored in the medication .carts according to the manufacturer's recommendations .Review of manufacturer guidelines, undated, revealed .Insulin Lispro [medication used to treat Diabetes] .Opened insulin lispro .prefilled pens can only be stored at room temperature .Throw away all insulin lispro in use after 28 days .Review of manufacturer guidelines, undated, revealed .Lantus [medication used to treat Diabetes] Discard all containers in use after 28 days .During an observation of the skilled hall medication cart on 11/18/2025 at 8:10 AM, revealed 2 Lispro and 2 Lantus insulin pens in use undated. Pharmacy delivery dates revealed the 4 insulin pens were not out of the 28-day use date.During an interview on 11/18/2025…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-19 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on facility policy review, observation, and interviews, the facility failed to follow infection control practices during 1 of 2 medication administration observations.The findings include:Review of the facility policy titled, Medication Administration Policy and Procedure, undated, revealed .Perform hand hygiene .During an observation of medication administration on 11/18/2025 at 7:49 AM, revealed the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) dropped a cap from a bottle of over-the-counter medication onto the floor. The ADON picked the cap up off the floor, placed the lid back on the bottle, and failed to sanitize the cap or wash her hands. Further observation revealed the ADON split a medication in half using the bare hands, all medications were placed in a cup, and the medications were administered to the resident. During an interview on 11/18/2025 at 7:56 AM, the ADON confirmed she dropped a cap from an over-the-counter medication, she picked the cap up off the floor, placed the lid back on the bottle, and did not sanitize the cap or wash her hands. The ADON also confirmed she…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-21 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, Reportable Diseases/Conditions list review, medical record review, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to report new COVID-19 infections for 7 residents (Residents #5, #24, #30, #34, #58, #59, and #66) to the local health department, failed to use appropriate infection control practices by allowing 2 residents (Residents #24 and #58) who were positive for COVID-19 to smoke with 2 residents (Residents #7 and #33) who did not have COVID-19 during 1 of 3 smoking activities observed, failed to ensure infection control practices were followed for 1 resident (Resident #24) of 7 resident's reviewed for transmission based precautions, failed to offer hand hygiene assistance to residents prior to meals for 4 residents (Residents #4, #48, #71, and #41) observed in 1 of 3 resident units observed for meal tray distribution. The findings include: Review of the facility's undated policy titled, Infection Prevention and Control Program, revealed .Surveillance data and reporting…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-21 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, medical record review, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to protect a resident's dignity by not covering a urinary catheter collection bag for 1 resident (Resident #55) of 4 residents observed with indwelling urinary catheters. The findings include: Review of the facility's undated policy titled, Promoting Resident Dignity, revealed .The facility will .treat each resident with respect and dignity .When caring for residents with urinary catheters, place the resident's urinary bag in a privacy bag . Review of the medical record revealed Resident #55 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Bladder Neck Obstruction, Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia and Major Depressive Disorder. Review of a quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE], revealed Resident #55 scored a 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status assessment, which indicated the resident was cognitively intact. The resident had an indwelling urinary catheter and an active…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-21 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, medical record review, facility investigation documentation review, and interviews, the facility failed to report an injury of unknown origin to the state designated authorities for 1 resident (Resident #24) of 24 residents reviewed for abuse. The findings include: Review of the facility's undated policy titled, Injury of Unknown Source, revealed .All unexplained injuries, including bruises, abrasions, and injuries of unknown source will be investigated .If an allegation of abuse is made or the injury is of unknown source, reporting and investigation procedures shall be implemented in accordance with the facility's abuse policies and procedures .An injury should be classified as an 'injury of unknown source' when both of the following conditions are met .The source of the injury was not observed by any person or the source of the injury could not be explained by the resident; and The injury is suspicious because of .The extent of the injury or .The location of the injury (e.g.,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-21 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, medical record review, observation and interview, the facility failed to provide nail care during Activities of Daily Living (ADL) care for 1 resident (Resident #62) of 24 residents reviewed for ADL care. The findings include: Review of the facility's undated policy titled ADL CARE (Nails), revealed .policy will provide the facility with guidance related to provision of care to resident's nails for good grooming and health .nursing staff will provide routine cleaning and inspection of nails during ADL care on an ongoing basis . Review of the medical record revealed Resident #62 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Visual Loss, Both Eyes, Congestive Heart Failure, Lack of Coordination and Schizophrenia. Review of a quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE], revealed Resident #62 scored a 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status assessment, which indicated the resident was cognitively intact. The resident had a diagnosis of Traumatic Brain…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-21 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, medical record review, facility document review, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure smoking supplies and medications were secured properly for 1 resident (Resident #11) of 69 residents observed. The findings include: Review of the facility's undated policy titled, Smoking Policy - Resident, revealed .The facility shall establish and maintain safe resident smoking practices .All smoking products such as cigarettes, lighters .will be kept at the nurses station in a designated area, and no products are allowed to be kept on resident or in their possession including their room . Review of the facility's undated policy titled, Medication Storage guidelines, revealed .The facility will ensure all medications will be stored in the medication rooms/carts according to the manufacturer's recommendations .to ensure proper sanitation, temperature, light, ventilation, moisture control, segregation, and security .All drugs .will be stored in locked compartments (i.e.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-21 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, medical record review, observation, and interview the facility failed to ensure nebulizer masks were stored appropriately for 2 residents (Residents #11 and #40) of 5 residents observed for respiratory care. The findings include: Review of the facility's undated policy titled, Respiratory Equipment Cleaning GUIDELINES, revealed .The facility will use these guidelines to manage respiratory equipment .Common respiratory equipment includes nebulizers .Cover respiratory items with plastic bag when not in use . Review of the medical record revealed Resident #11 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Pneumonia, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), Acute and Chronic Respiratory Failure, Major Depressive Disorder, Anxiety Disorder, and Malignant Neoplasm of Esophagus. Review of a NURSING - Admission/readmission Nursing Evaluation for Resident #11 dated 7/29/2024, revealed .Type of respiratory treatments ordered .Aerosol/nebulizer . Review of the Nurse…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 14 citations
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-21 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — isolatedSet up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, prior survey results review, medical record review, facility documentation review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to maintain an effective and ongoing Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) program. The QAPI committee's failure resulted in continued deficient practice when medications were found at 1 resident's (Resident #11) bedside of 69 residents observed. The findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) Plan, revised 4/2014, revealed .The facility shall develop, implement, and maintain an ongoing, facility-wide QAPI Plan designed to monitor and evaluate the quality and safety of resident care .and resolve identified problems .objectives .Provide a means to identify and resolve present and potential negative outcomes related to resident care and services .Provide structure and processes to correct identified quality and/or safety deficiencies .Establish and implement plans to correct…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-03 · tag F0554 — isolatedAllow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, medical record review, facility documentation review, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to prevent 1 resident (Resident #10) from self-administering medications without an assessment for self-administration and without a physician's order for self-administration. The findings include: Review of the facility's undated policy titled, Self-Administration of Medication Guidelines, revealed .A resident may only self-administer medications after the facility's interdisciplinary team has determined which medications may be self-administered safely .The results of the interdisciplinary team assessment will be recorded in the resident's medical record. The attending physician will be notified of the result of the interdisciplinary team assessment . Medical record review revealed Resident #10 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and readmitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including Psoriatic Arthritis, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Lactose Intolerance, Bipolar…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-03 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility documents, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to maintain a homelike environment, free from odors in 4 resident rooms of 21 resident rooms reviewed for homelike environment. The findings include: Review of a facility document Wheelchair Cleaning dated monthly, revealed wheelchairs of incontinent residents were to be cleaned weekly and the document had no documentation of wheelchair cleaning after 9/1/2023. Observation on 4/16/2024 at 4:05 PM, with the DON, in room [ROOM NUMBER], revealed a strong foul odor. The resident was seated on his bed, and no odor was noted in close proximity to the resident. Upon further investigation, the foul odor was noted to be the resident's wheelchair. During an interview on 4/16/2024 at 4:10 PM, the DON confirmed the foul odor in the room was from urine and the DON indicated it was from the resident's wheelchair. Observation on 4/16/2024 at 4:35 PM, with the DON, in room [ROOM NUMBER], revealed a strong foul odor. The resident was lying in the bed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2021-11-04 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on facility policy reviews, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to maintain a sanitary kitchen evidenced by undated, unlabeled, and opened to air food items in 1 of 1 walk-in refrigerator/freezer combo unit and 1 of 1 milk cooler; failed to maintain sanitary dry food storage in 2 of 3 dry storage bins; failed to maintain cooking equipment in a clean and sanitary manner; and failed to obtain and record temperatures for the meal service, freezer, refrigerator, milk cooler, ice cream cooler, and dishwasher machine, which had the potential to affect 73 of 74 residents in the facility. The findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Food Storage, dated 11/25/2019 showed .Food is stored .in a clean safe sanitary manner that complies with state and federal guidelines . Review of the facility policy titled, Cold Storage Areas, dated 4/1/2021 showed .Cold food(s) will be stored under safe and sanitary conditions .Record .monitor temperatures of .refrigerators .freezers .Temperatures must be monitored .recorded on all units in which food for resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2021-11-04 · tag F0868 — widespreadHave the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility policy, review of facility documentation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure the Medical Director attended monthly Quality Assessment and Assurance meetings for 8 of 10 months. The findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) Plan, dated 4/2014 showed This facility shall develop, implement, and maintain an ongoing, facility-wide QAPI Plan designed to monitor and evaluate the quality and safety of resident care, pursue methods to improve care quality, and resolve identified problems .This committee shall meet monthly . Review of an undated, signed statement from the Administrator showed At a minimum the QAPI committee consists of Medical Director, NHA [Nursing Home Administrator], DON [Director of Nursing], Risk Manager, Social Services Director . Review of the QAPI attendance sign-in sheets dated 1/2021, 3/2021, 4/2021, 5/2021, 6/2021, 7/2021, 8/2021, and 9/2021 showed no evidence the Medical Director attended the meetings. During an interview on 11/4/2021 at 7:10 PM, the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2021-11-04 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — patternImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, medical record review, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to notify the Physician and/or the Nurse Practitioner (NP) of medication errors for 2 residents (Residents #29 and #71) of 5 residents reviewed for medication administration. The findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Administering Medications, revised 4/2019, showed .Medication errors are documented, reported, and reviewed .If a drug is withheld, refused, or given at a time other that the scheduled time, the individual administering the medication shall initial and circle the MAR [Medication Administration Record] space provided for that drug and dose .the individual administering the medication records in the resident's medical record .the date and time the medication was administered .the dosage . Resident #29 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis including Parkinson's Disease, Dementia with Behavioral Disturbance, Congestive Heart Failure, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-11-04 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to replace the baseboards in 25 of 50 resident rooms and failed to repair holes in the walls in 5 of 50 resident rooms. The findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Quality of Life-Homelike Environment, dated 4/2014 showed .Residents are provided with a clean .comfortable .homelike environment .facility staff .management shall maximize .the characteristics of the facility that reflect a personalized, homelike setting .characteristics include .Cleanliness .Inviting .decor . During multiple observations on 11/1/2021, 11/2/2021, 11/3/2021, and 11/4/2021, resident rooms 201, 202, 203, 204, 205, 206, 207, 208, 209, 210, 211, 212, 213, 214, 215, 216, 305, 306, 307, 309, 312, 313, 314, 315, and 317 all had missing baseboards. Multiple observations on 11/1/2021, 11/2/2021, and 11/3/2021 showed the following: room [ROOM NUMBER] had a hole in the wall under the combination heat/air unit under the window. room [ROOM NUMBER]…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2021-11-04 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — patternEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the Lippincott Manual of Nursing Practice, facility policy review, medical record review, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure basic nursing standards of care were followed for medication administration and documentation for 2 residents (Residents #29 and #71) of 5 residents reviewed for medication administration. The findings include: Review of the Lippincott Manual of Nursing Practice, Ninth Edition, copyright 2010, showed .Common Legal Claims for Departure from Standards of Care .Failure to administer medications properly and in a timely fashion or to report omitted doses appropriately .Failure to make prompt, accurate entries in a patient's medical record .Failure to adhere to facility policy or procedural guidelines . Review of the facility policy titled, Charting and Documentation, revised 7/2017, showed .The following information is to be documented in the resident medical record .Medications administered . Review of the facility policy titled, Administering…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2021-11-04 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — patternEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, medical record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed ensure prescribed medications were administered as ordered for 2 residents (Residents #29 and #71) of 5 residents observed during medication pass, which resulted in 8 medication errors of 27 opportunities by 1 of 2 nurses observed, resulting in a medication error rate of 29.63%. The findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Administering Medications, revised 4/2019, revealed .Medications are administered in accordance with prescriber orders, including any required time frame .Medication administration times are determined by resident need and benefit, not staff convenience .Medications are administered within one (1) hour of their prescribed time .The individual administering the medication checks the label THREE (3) times to verify the right resident, right medication, right dosage, right time and right method (route) of administration before giving the medication .If drug is withheld, refused,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-11-04 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on facility policy review, review of Centers for Disease Control (CDC) guidance, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to require universal use of eye protection as part of Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) during all patient care encounters in a community with high transmission rate which had the potential to result in transmission of COVID-19 to 74 of 74 residents in the facility. The findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Covid-19 - Pandemic Plan, revised April 2021 showed .Initiate transmission-based precautions based on CDC guidance .The Infection Preventionist will monitor the CDC .for information and guidance on the virus . Review of the CDC's Interim Infection Prevention and Control Recommendations to Prevent SARS-CoV-2 [Covid -19] Spread in Nursing Homes, dated 9/10/2021, showed .These recommendations supplement CDC's Interim Infection Prevention and Control Recommendations for Healthcare Personnel During the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Pandemic and are specific for nursing homes .even as nursing homes resume normal practices,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-11-04 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, medical record review, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure medical information was not visible for 1 resident (Resident #68) of 27 residents reviewed for dignity. The findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Quality of Life - Dignity, dated 2/2020, showed Each resident shall be cared for in a manner that promotes and enhances his or her sense of well-being, level of satisfaction with life, feeling of self-worth and self esteem .Residents are treated with dignity and respect at all times .Staff protect confidential clinical information .Signs indicating the resident's clinical status or care needs are not openly posted in the resident's room unless specifically requested by the resident or family member. Discreet posting of important clinical information for safety reasons is permissible (e.g.[for example], taped to the inside of the closet door) . Review of the medical record showed Resident #68 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-11-04 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, medical record review, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the correct dosage of medication was supplied for 1 resident (Resident #29) of 5 residents reviewed for medication administration. The findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Administering Medications, revised 4/2019, .Medications are administered in accordance with prescriber orders .The individual administering the medication checks the label THREE (3) times to verify the right resident, right medication, right dosage, right time and right method (route) of administration before giving the medication . Review of the contract titled, PHARMACY CONSULTING SERVICES, revised 11/6/2018 showed .Labeling, Handling, Storage, and Distribution. Pharmacy will assist Operator in complying with the federal and state regulations drug labeling, handling, storage and distribution .Pharmaceutical Products and Services .Pharmacy will provide to Operator the prescription and over-the-counter…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-11-04 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, medical record review, observation, and interviews, the facility failed prevent a significant medication error for 1 resident (Resident #29) of 5 residents reviewed for medication administration. The findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Administering Medications, revised 4/2019, .Medications are administered in accordance with prescriber orders, including any required time frame .Medication administration times are determined by resident need and benefit, not staff convenience .The individual administering the medication checks the label THREE (3) times to verify the right resident, right medication, right dosage, right time and right method (route) of administration before giving the medication . Resident #29 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis including Parkinson's Disease, Dementia with Behavioral Disturbance, Psychotic Disorder with Delusions, Psychotic Disorder with Hallucinations, and Major Depressive Disorder. Review of the Physician's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-11-04 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, medical record review, and interview, the facility failed to maintain accurate and complete medical records for 1 resident (Resident #80) of 33 residents reviewed for medical records. The findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Discharging the Resident, revised 12/2016, showed .Assess and document resident's condition at discharge, including skin assessment .The following information should be recorded in the resident's medical record .the date and time the discharge was made .The name and title of the individual(s) who assisted in the discharge .All assessment data obtained during the procedure .The signature and title of the person recording the data . Resident #80 was admitted to the facility 7/29/2021 with diagnoses including Acute and Chronic Respiratory Failure with Hypoxia (low oxygen in the blood), Generalized Epilepsy (seizures), Atrial Fibrillation (irregular heartbeat), Rheumatic Mitral Insufficiency, Hypothyroidism, and Lack of Coordination. Review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$9,062 in federal fines across 1 penalty.
- $9,062 — penalty dated 2024-05-03
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to PLAINVIEW HEALTHCARE PARTNERS — 9 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 2 of 5 | 2.1 | -0.1 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 2.3 | -0.3 vs chain |
| Staffing | 2 of 5 | 2.1 | -0.1 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 2 of 5 | 2.6 | -0.6 vs chain |
The other 8 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.1★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| HUNTSVILLE TN HOLDCO LLC | Organization | DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 11/01/2018 |
| AREM, JEFFREY | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 11/01/2018 |
| HERSKOWITZ, DAVID | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 11/01/2018 |
| MOSKOWITZ, ISAAC | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 11/01/2018 |
| DANIEL, ANTON | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 10/18/2022 |
| NORRIS, JOHN | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 06/26/2023 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 10 rows in the source record cover these 6 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 76% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $388K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in TN
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Tennessee Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 445288. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-11-19, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.