Countryside Post-Acute And Rehabilitation Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

54.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 37 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 60.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 35 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.26 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 36% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 6% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 162 beds and averages 88.3 residents a day — about 55% occupied, or roughly 74 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.66 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.21 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.19 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.17 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.86 on weekdays — 18% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.23 to 0.15 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 40% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

15 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 5 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-25 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on policy review, Infection Control Nurse job description review, facility Infection Control Program document review, Instructions for Humalog sheets review, medical record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to establish and implement a program to identify, report, investigate, and control infections and communicable diseases when the Infection Preventionist (IP)/Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) failed to track organisms being treated in the facility, monitor for outbreaks and cross contamination, and when 1 of 3 staff ( Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) B) failed to properly clean an insulin pen during medication administration. This had the potential to affect 88 of 88 residents in the facility. The findings include: 1. Review of the facility policy titled, 'Infection Prevention and Control Program, dated 6/20/2025, revealed .This facility has established and maintains an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-25 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolated
  Provide or obtain dental services for each resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, medical record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to provide dental services for 1 of 3 (Resident #17) sampled residents reviewed for dental services. The findings include: 1. Review of the facility undated policy titled, Dental Services, revealed .It is the policy of this facility to assist residents in obtaining routine .and emergency dental care .'Routine dental services' means an annual inspection of the oral cavity for signs of disease .smoothing of broken teeth .'Emergency dental services' includes services needed to treat an episode of acute pain in teeth, gums, or palate; broken or otherwise damaged teeth, or any other problem of the oral cavity that required immediate attention by a dentist .The Social Services Director maintains contact information for providers of dental services that are available to the facility residents .The facility will if necessary or requested, assist the resident with making dental appointments and arranging transportation to and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2021-09-10 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on policy review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure food was stored, prepared, and served under sanitary conditions as evidenced by expired food items in the cooler, 1 of 5 Kitchen staff (Cook #1) failed to practice infection control while performing tray line temperatures, and 2 of 3 (West and East Hall) nourishment refrigerators were dirty. This had the potential to affect 75 of 85 residents who had received a tray from the Kitchen. The findings include: Review of the facility's undated policy titled, Getting Ready to Take Food Temperatures Sanitizing The Thermometer, revealed .The thermometer must be first sanitized and calibrated .The thermometer must be sanitized to avoid contaminating the food being tested .wipe the stem of the thermometer with an alcohol swab between measurements . Observation of the walk in cooler in the Kitchen on 9/7/2021 beginning at 9:30 AM, revealed 8 of 15 quarts of Scrambled Egg Mix with an expiration date of 8/30/2021. Observation of the walk in cooler in the Kitchen on 9/8/2021 at 7:50 AM, revealed a new case of 14…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2021-09-10 · tag F0886 — failed to test for COVID-19 as required — pattern
  Perform COVID19 testing on residents and staff.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on facility policy, COVID 19 testing log review, and staff interview, the facility failed to develop and implement a system to track and ensure all staff were tested for COVID-19 twice weekly for the prevention and potential spread of COVID 19 when 29 of 42 staff members (Registered Nurse (RN) #1, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #2, #3, #4, #7, and #8, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #1, #2, #3, #4, #5, #6, #7, #8, #9, #10, #11, #13, and #14, Occupational Therapist (OT) #1 and #2, Physical Therapist Assistant (LPT) #1, Housekeeper #1, #2, and #3, Certified Dietary Manager (CDM), Receptionist #1, and [NAME] #1 and #2) failed to perform COVID 19 testing for 6 days of 18 days (8/23/2021, 8/26/2021, 8/30/2021, 9/2/2021, 9/6/2021, and 9/9/2021) reviewed. The findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Covid Guidance . dated 4/27/2021, revealed .TESTING: Unvaccinated staff must continue to be routinely tested based on county positivity rates .> [greater than] 10% 2 x week [twice a week] . Review of the facility's COVID TESTING logs from 8/23/2021-9/9/2021 revealed the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2021-09-10 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to promote and enhance the resident's dignity during a dressing change for 1 of 3 sampled residents (Resident #338) reviewed. The findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Quality of Life- Dignity, revised 2/2020, revealed .Staff promote, maintain, and protect resident privacy, including bodily during assistance with personal care and during treatment procedures . Review of the medical record, revealed Resident #338 had diagnoses of Paraplegia, Diabetes, Morbid Obesity, Congestive Heart Failure, Neurogenic Bladder, Pressure Ulcers Sacral Region and Right Ankle. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed Resident #338 was cognitively intact and required total dependence with all activities of daily living. Wound care observation in the resident's room on 9/9/2021 at 3:08 PM, revealed the Treatment Nurse and Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #1 left Resident #338 exposed on the bed during…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2021-09-10 · tag F0637 — isolated
  Assess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on medical record review and interview, the facility failed to initiate a significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment within 14 days after hospice services were ordered for 1 of 21 sampled residents (Resident #12) reviewed. The findings include: Review of the medical record, revealed resident #12 had diagnoses of Parkinson's Disease, Alzheimer's Disease, Dysphagia, History of COVID-19, Bipolar Disorder, Psychotic Disorder, Dementia, and Cardiac Pacemaker. Review of a Physician Order dated 4/12/2021, revealed .Hospice to evaluate and treat . Review of a medical record, revealed there was no significant change MDS assessment completed after Resident #12's admission to hospice services. Interview on 9/9/2021 at 3:20 PM, the MDS Coordinator was asked if a significant change should have been completed when Resident #12 was ordered hospice services. The MDS Coordinator stated, .I didn't do it .

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2021-09-10 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and interview, the facility failed to implement neurological (neuro) checks and appropriate interventions after unwitnessed falls for 2 of 2 sampled residents (Resident #85 and #86) reviewed for falls. The findings include: Review of the medical record, revealed Resident #85 had diagnoses of Cerebral Infarction, Dysphagia, Aphasia, Malignant Neoplasm of Lung, History of Covid-19, Depression, Anxiety, Failure to Thrive, and Repeated Falls. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed Resident #85 had severe cognitive deficits, required limited to extensive assistance with most of his activities of daily living, had functional limitations in range of motion with impairment on one side in both his upper and lower extremities, and had 1 fall with no injury and 1 fall with injury. Review of an Incident Investigation Note dated 8/17/2021, revealed .Resident found in floor sitting on his bottom in from [front] of the restroom door. Resident states I was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2021-09-10 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, medical record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to provide care and services to maintain an indwelling urinary catheter for 1 of 2 sampled residents (Resident #338) reviewed for an indwelling urinary catheter. The findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Foley Catheter Insertion, Male Resident, revised 10/2010, revealed .Verify that there is a physician's order for this procedure . Review of the medical record, revealed Resident #338 had diagnoses of Paraplegia, Diabetes, Morbid Obesity, Congestive Heart Failure, Neurogenic Bladder, Pressure Ulcers Sacral Region and Right Ankle. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed Resident #338 was cognitively intact, required total dependence for all activities of daily living, and had an indwelling urinary catheter. Review of the Physician Orders dated 8/31/2021, revealed .Foley output two times a day . There was no order for an indwelling urinary catheter. Observation…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2021-09-10 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
  Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on the policy review, medical record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents maintained acceptable parameters of nutritional status, and failed to accurately assess, implement, and monitor interventions to prevent severe weight loss for 1 of 4 sampled residents (Resident #22) for weight loss. The findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Weight Assessment and Intervention, revised 9/2008, revealed .nursing staff will measure resident weights on admission, the next day, and weekly for two weeks thereafter .weights will be measured monthly .dietitian will review the unit weight record by the 15th of the month to follow individual weight trends over time .threshold for significant unplanned and undesired weight loss will be based on the following criteria .3 months - 7.5% weight loss is significant; greater than 7.5% is severe . Review of the medical record, revealed Resident #22 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses of Cerebral Infarction,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2021-09-10 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
  Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on policy review, medical record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 5 nurses (Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #7) followed the facility policy for medication administration through a percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tube for 1 of 2 sampled residents (Resident #24) observed receiving medications through a PEG tube. The findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Administering Medications through an Enteral Tube, revised 11/2018, revealed .Dilute medication . Dilute crushed (powdered) medication with at least 30 ml [milliliters] purified water (or prescribed amount) .pour diluted medications into the barrel of the syringe . Review of the medical record, revealed Resident #24 had diagnoses of Gastrostomy Tube, Cellulitis of Abdominal Wall, Diaphragmatic Hernia, Dysphagia, and Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease. Review of the Physician's Orders dated 7/12/2021, revealed .Flush peg tube with 100cc [cubic centimeter] of water every shift to keep tube patent . Observation in the resident's room on 9/8/2021 at 10:57 AM, revealed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to PLAINVIEW HEALTHCARE PARTNERS — 9 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 10 rows in the source record cover these 6 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 85% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.4M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 28% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in TN