Sandy Springs Center For Nursing And Healing LLC
1500 S Johnson Ferry Road, Atlanta, GA 30319 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 165 certified beds · (404) 252-2002 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited May 2023
- inspectors cited 3 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (36) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
- nursing-staff turnover (70%) runs well above the national median (45%)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 1 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 3 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 4 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 16.3% | 15.3% | 15.4% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 6.7% | 5.6% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.2% | 0.9% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 1.6% | 2.5% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 15.3% | 11.3% | 6.5% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 2.0% | 3.2% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 22.1% | 15.2% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 13.8% | 20.5% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 96.0% | 95.0% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 4.4% | 5.6% | 4.7% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 30.6% | 15.8% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 13.8% | 19.9% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 1.0% | 2.6% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 77.4% | 78.4% | 79.4% | typical |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 29.3% | 25.0% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 10.6% | 11.6% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 2.08 | 2.15 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.99 | 1.90 | 1.80 | worse |
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
57.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 276 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 81.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 112 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.32 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 53% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 32% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 57.5%CMS range 50.6–63.5 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | better than U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.9%CMS range 8.4–13.7 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 81.2% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 79.5% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 74.1% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 99.1% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 100.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 98.8% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 1.4% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 2.7% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 7.5%CMS range 4.8–10.9 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.07 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 165 beds and averages 143.9 residents a day — about 87% occupied, or roughly 21 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.19 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.37 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.74 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.84 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.33 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.43 to 0.22 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 70% is well above the national median of 45%. 3 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are unchanged from the previous inspection. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
36 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 23 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2023-05-07 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, record review, document review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan for two of 57 sampled residents (R#12 and R#120). A review of the care plan for R#12 revealed a care plan was not developed to address the resident's needs related to transferring and the use of a mechanical lift to include the sling size that was needed. During observations of a transfer of R#12 utilizing a mechanical lift on 5/3/24, the resident voiced discomfort and concern that the resident was going to fall during the transfer using the lift. Further observations revealed the resident was not properly placed in the sling and the resident was not properly supported by the sling during the transfer. As a result, the resident was placed in a wheelchair and could not be properly positioned in the wheelchair and the resident slid from the wheelchair onto the floor sustaining no injuries. Also, the facility failed to include care plan objectives and interventions…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · J2023-05-07 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, record review, document review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure two of four sampled residents (R) (R#12 and R#69) for accidents received adequate supervision to prevent accidents. Observations of a mechanical lift transfer of R#12 on 5/3/23 revealed the resident voiced discomfort and concern that they were falling during the transfer and the observation revealed the mechanical lift sling was not positioned properly to support the resident during the transfer. The Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs), CNA RR and CNA TT, who were performing the transfer failed to appropriately supervise the transfer and intervene to properly position the resident in the sling when the resident verbalized discomfort. As a result, once the resident was moved to the wheelchair, the staff were unable to effectively position the resident in the chair, and the resident slid from the wheelchair onto the floor. In addition, interviews with nursing staff revealed CNAs who lacked the minimum training and oversight to ensure correct sling sizes and safe…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · J2023-05-07 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolatedEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, record review, document review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure certified nursing assistants (CNAs) demonstrated competency in skills and techniques necessary to care for residents' needs related to transfers using a mechanical lift for two of 15 CNA competency documents that were provided. During observations of a transfer of R#12 by way of a mechanical lift, the resident voiced discomfort and concern of falling during the transfer. Observations revealed the resident was not appropriately positioned in the mechanical lift sling and as a result, after the resident was transferred to the wheelchair, R#12 slid from the wheelchair into the floor because the resident could not be appropriately positioned in the chair. A review of training records revealed the competency evaluations for the CNAs that performed the transfer (CNA RR and CNA TT) indicated they had not met all the requirements to demonstrate competence and there was no evidence that the CNAs…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-04-16 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure the kitchen was clean, staff washed hands and wore gloves appropriately between task changes, staff wore a beard cover when wearing a beard, and temperatures were recorded for the refrigerator and freezer. These failures had the potential to affect 144 residents who consumed food prepared by the kitchen.Findings include:Review of the facility policy titled, Preventing Foodborne Illness- Employee Hygiene and Sanitary Practice with an issue date of April 2024, Policy: Nutrition Services staff shall follow appropriate hygiene and sanitary procedures to prevent the spread of foodborne illness. Gloves are single use items and must be discarded after completing the task for which they were used. The use of disposable gloves does not substitute for proper handwashing. Hairnets or caps and/or beard restraints must be worn to keep hair from contacting exposed food, clean equipment, utensils, and linens.Review of the facility policy titled, Refrigerator and Freezer with an issue date of April 2024…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-04-16 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure appropriate infection control practices were implemented with the onset of a COVID outbreak. The facility failed to ensure the dental hygienist used infection control interventions to ensure the dental cart moving from room to room was cleaned and a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) using the same box of wipes room to room, not following infection control practice. As a result of this deficient practice, all facility residents had the potential for illness from a COVID exposure since the facility was already in outbreak on the [NAME] unit. The facility census was 144 residents.Findings include: Review of the undated facility policy titled, Linen Operations and Management, revealed, .Clean linen should be transported on carts designated for clean linen only. The policy did not address how clean linen should be transported once it is removed from the cart to take it to a resident room. Review of the facility policy…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-16 · tag F0552 — isolatedEnsure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on resident family and staff interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure the risks, benefits and alternatives involved in the use of psychotropic medications were communicated to the resident/resident representative for one of five residents (Resident (R)1) reviewed for unnecessary medications. This deficient practice had the potential for the resident/resident representative not being informed of treatments being administered by the facility.Findings include:Review of the facility's policy titled, Use of Psychotropic Medication, reviewed March 2025, revealed, Prior to initiating or increasing a psychotropic medication, the resident, family, and/or resident representative must be informed of the benefits, risks, and alternatives for the medication, including any black box warnings for antipsychotic medications, in advance of such initiation or increase.Review of R1's admission Record located in the electronic medical record (EMR) under the Profile tab, revealed an admission date of 04/25/2024 and a readmission date of 02/10/2026 with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-16 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure written information regarding the right to formulate and advanced directive, change an advanced directive, or the right to accept and/or refuse medical and surgical treatment was provided to one of two residents (Resident (R) 10) or their resident representative (RR) for advanced directives out of a total sample of 33 residents. This failure had the potential for resident wishes regarding care not to be honored. Findings include:Review of the facility policy titled, . Advanced Directives-Residents' Rights Regarding Treatment, dated October 2025, revealed, It is the policy of this facility to support and facilitate a resident's right to request, refuse and/or discontinue medical and surgical treatment and to formulate an advanced directive. (2.) The facility will provide the resident or resident representative [with] information, in a manner that is easy to understand, about the right to refuse medical or surgical…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-16 · tag F0628 — isolatedProvide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, resident and staff interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide written documentation of a hospital transfer to four of five residents (Resident (R) 27, R5, R12 and R4), and to their representative reviewed out of a total sample of 33 residents. The facility also failed to create a recapitulation (summary) of the resident's stay at the facility, a final summary of the resident's status, and reconciliation of all pre- and post-discharge medications and notification of the Ombudsman of the resident's discharge for one of five residents reviewed (R)158. This failure placed the resident and/or the resident's representative at risk for lack of awareness of rights, including the right to appeal the transfer.Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Bed Hold Prior to Transfer, dated March 2025 revealed, It is the policy of this facility to provide written information to the resident and/or the resident representative regarding bed hold…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-16 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on resident and staff interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a baseline care plan was completed/ shared with the resident for one of one resident (Resident (R) 95) reviewed for baseline care plan. As a result of this deficient practice the residents may not have received care and services needed.Findings include:Review of the facility's policy titled, Baseline Care Plan reviewed/revised October 2025, revealed The facility will develop and implement a baseline care plan for each resident that includes the instructions needed to provide effective and person-centered care of the residents that meet professional standards of quality care. The baseline care plan will: . Be developed within 48 hours of a resident's admission. Include the minimum healthcare information necessary to properly care for a resident including but not limited to . Initial goals based on admission orders.Review of R95's admission Record located in the electronic medical record (EMR) under the Profile tab, revealed an admission date of 03/31/2026 with medical…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-16 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interviews, record review, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure the physician's orders were followed by failing to do a urinary analysis with culture and sensitivity (UA, C&S), a two part test to diagnose a urinary tract infection, for one of one (Resident (R)26) resident reviewed for laboratory orders. This deficient practice had the potential to allow residents to go with undiagnosed ailments when tests were not completed as ordered.Findings include:A facility policy titled Documentation in Medical Record revised November 2023 revealed, Policy: Each resident's medical record shall contain an accurate representation of the actual experiences of the resident and include enough information to provide a picture of the resident's progress through complete, accurate and timely documentation.Review of R26's undated admission Record located under the Profile tab in the electronic medical record (EMR) revealed an admission date of 03/03/2026 with diagnosis of traumatic subdural hemorrhage with loss of consciousness, malignant neoplasm of prostate, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-16 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure the March 2026 recommendations from the pharmacist were communicated to the resident's physician and results of the communication documented in the resident's medical record for one of five residents (Resident (R)1) reviewed for unnecessary medications. This deficient practice had the potential for the recommendations needing action by the physician were not addressed affecting needed resident care.Findings include:Review of the facility's policy titled, Medication Regimen Review, reviewed August 2023, revealed The pharmacist shall communicate any irregularities to the facility in the following ways: Verbal communication to the attending physician, Director of Nursing, and/or staff of any urgent needs. Written communication to the attending physician, the facility's Medical Director, and the Director of Nursing.Review of R1's admission Record located in the electronic medical record (EMR) under the Profile tab, revealed an admission date of 04/25/2024 and a readmission date of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-19 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, staff and resident representative interviews, record reviews and review of the facility's policy titled, Housekeeping Guidelines, the facility failed to provide housekeeping and maintenance services necessary to maintain a sanitary, clean, comfortable and homelike environment for residents. Findings include: During review of the facility's policy document titled, Housekeeping Guidelines, Daily Resident/Patient Room Cleaning, undated, revealed, The room cleaning tasks should be performed in the following order: 1. Straighten up the residence room. 2. Dust all flat surfaces with a cloth and disinfectant, clean the air vent covers, and spot clean all necessary areas. 3. Dust mop the floor and sweep all trash and debris to the door and pick it with the dustbin. 4. Empty and clean the trash cans and put in a new liner if necessary. 5. Wet mop the room using disinfectant, ensuring A caution floor sign is in use. During the initial observations of the facility on 12/15/2025 at 11:15 am, all units toured had a lingering foul odor noted. The flooring on the East and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-19 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, staff interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of two facility ice machines located in the service hallway of the East Wing Unit was free from visible dirt and debris. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents who received ice from this ice machine.Findings include:On 12/16/2025 at 2:38 pm, during an inspection of the ice machine on the East Wing of the Facility, visible brown/black residue was present along the interior chute. Slime-like buildup was observed on the underside of the ice shield. Loose particulate debris was present in the ice collection bin. The ice machine was actively producing ice at the time of observation.During an observation/ interview of the ice machine on 12/16/2025 at 2:38 pm on the East unit revealed black substance inside the lid with dust particles around the front of the machine on the inside. The Director of Maintenance (DM) confirmed that the machine needed to be cleaned and confirmed the observation. The DM denied the Dietary Department being responsible for the cleaning and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 23 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-19 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications were secured, one of three medication carts on the East wing was left unlocked and unattended. The deficient practice had the potential to cause harm to residents located on the East Wing Unit by allowing unauthorized access to medications.Findings include:Per the Facility's Medication Storage Policy, dated October 1, 2025, all drugs and biologicals will be stored in locked compartments (i.e., medication carts, cabinets, drawers, refrigerators, and medication rooms). Only authorized personnel will have access to the keys to locked compartments. During medication pass, medications must be under the direct observation of the person administering medications or locked in the medication storage area/cart.Observation on 12/18/2025 at 8:38 am, during a tour of the East Wing Unit, a medication cart (Middle Cart) positioned to the left of the East Wing Nursing Station was left unlocked. There were no licensed nurses or other authorized staff present in the hallway. The cart contained multiple…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-04-10 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, policy reviews and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure that the kitchen was maintained in a sanitary manner. Specifically, the facility failed to maintain hot food items on the steam table above 135 degrees to prevent food borne illness, failed to ensure staff entering the kitchen wore a hairnet properly, and failed to ensure the dish machine had a final rinse temperature at or above 180 degrees for proper sanitization. The deficient practices had the potential to adversely affect 146 of 146 residents receiving an oral diet. Findings include: During the initial tour of the kitchen on 3/10/2025 at 9:49 am, it was observed that the kitchen did not have a foot-pedal trash can. During a subsequent visit on 3/27/2025 at 9:48 am the kitchen did not have a foot-pedal trash can. When staff washed and dried their hands with paper towels, staff was observed adjusting the lid of the trash container to place paper in the trash can. During an interview on 3/27/2025 at 10:21 am with Dietary Aide (DA) WW who stated that the staff in the kitchen did not have…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-10 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 5. R4 was admitted into the facility on 6/14/2022 with diagnoses of, but not limited to immunodeficiency conditions, end stage renal disease, dementia, and unilateral primary osteoarthritis of right knee. Review of R4's care plan revealed R4 was incontinent of bowel and bladder and required extensive to total assistance with Activities of Daily Living (ADLs). The care plan also stated R4 would receive peri-care with each incontinent episode. R4's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 11, moderate cognitive impairment. The MDS also revealed R4 required extensive to total assistance with ADLs. Observation of incontinent care on 4/8/2025 at 11:45 am for R4 performed by Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs) JJ and assisted by CNA BB revealed the infection control protocol for incontinent care had not been followed. CNA JJ used a disposable wipe and cleansed the R4's perineal area from back to front four times. CNA JJ also used a one clean washcloth…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-10 · tag F0644 — isolatedCoordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to complete Preadmission Screening/Resident Review Assessment I and II (PASARR) for two of three sampled residents; Resident (R) 74 and R31 for serious mental disorders or intellectual disabilities and related conditions. Findings include: A facility policy titled, Resident Assessment - Coordination with PASARR Program date reviewed/revised 12/2022, This facility coordinates assessments with the preadmission screening and resident review (PASARR) program under Medicaid to ensure that individuals with a mental disorder, intellectual disability, or a related condition receives care and services in the most integrated setting appropriate to their needs. 1. All applicants to this facility will be screened for serious mental disorders or intellectual disabilities and related conditions in accordance with the State's Medicaid rules for screening. a. PASARR Level I - initial pre-screening that is completed prior to admission . ii. Positive Level I Screen…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-10 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, record review, a review of the facility policy titled Comprehensive Care Plans, the facility identifies weight loss for two residents (R) (R20 and R59) of four residents reviewed for nutrition out of 36 sampled residents. Findings include: In a review of the facility's policy titled, Comprehensive Care Plans, revised on 9/12/2022, revealed that, 1. The care planning process will include an assessment of the resident's strengths and needs and will incorporate the resident's personal and cultural preference in developing goals of care. The policy also stated that All care assessment areas (CAAs) triggered by the MDS will be considered in developing the plan of care. Other factors identified by the interdisciplinary team, or in accordance with the resident's preferences, will be address in the plan of care. 1. In a review of R20's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed an original admission date of 12/16/2024, with multiple diagnosis of but not limited to periprosthetic fracture around…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-10 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, record review, and review of the facility's policy titled Medication Administration, the facility failed to administer scheduled medications within 60 minutes before or after the scheduled medication time for one Resident (R) 151 of nine sampled residents reviewed for medication administration. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Medication Administration date reviewed/revised January 2023 revealed, Medications are administered by licensed nurses, or other staff who are legally authorized to do so in this state, as ordered by the physician and in accordance with professional standards of practice, in a manner to prevent contamination or infection. The facility's policy explanation and guidelines revealed .17. Sign MAR (Medication Administration Record) after administered . Review of the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed R151 was admitted into the facility with multiple diagnoses that included but not limited to sepsis cystitis without hematuria, urinary tract…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-10 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to provide Activities of Daily Living (ADL) care for two of 17 sampled residents (R) (R4 and R A). Findings include: 1. R4 was admitted into the facility on 6/14/2022 with diagnoses of, but not limited to immunodeficiency conditions, end stage renal disease, dementia, and unilateral primary osteoarthritis of right knee. Record review of R4's care plan revealed R4 was incontinent of bowel and bladder and required extensive to total assistance with Activities of Daily Living (ADLs). The care plan also stated R4 would receive peri-care with each incontinent episode. R4's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 11, indicating moderate cognitive impairment. The MDS also revealed R4 required extensive to total assistance with ADLs. A record review of R4's Point of Care (POC) which was completed by the Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs) revealed: R4's POC documentation for January 2025 revealed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-10 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure Vancomycin (antibiotic medication) was administered as ordered for one of six sampled residents. Resident (R) 399 missed three daily doses of intervenous (IV) Vancomycin prescribed for surgically closed wound infection of front left trochanter (left hip). Findings include: Review of the admission Record revealed R399 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of, but not limited to, Alzheimer's disease, dementia, contracture of right and left knees, adult failure to thrive, muscle weakness, gastrostomy (PEG-tube), PICC-line, surgically closed wound infection of front left trochanter (left hip). Review of Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], revealed R399 had a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) score of 00, which indicated the resident had severe cognitive impairment. The MDS indicated the resident required extensive assistance with most activities of daily living (ADLs). Review of Physician Order revealed,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-10 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interviews, record review, and a review of the facility policy titled Weight Monitoring, the facility failed to perform weekly weights after significant weight loss and failed to implement a dietician recommendation for one resident (R) 20 of four residents reviewed for nutrition. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Weight Monitoring, it was revealed that 5. Weight monitoring schedule will be developed upon admission for all residents: . b. newly admitted residents- monitor weight weekly for four weeks C. Resident with weight loss- monitor weight weekly d. if clinically indicated- monitor weight daily e. All others- monitor weight monthly. Review of R20's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed an original admission date of 12/16/2024 and a discharge date of 3/25/2025. R20 was admitted with multiple diagnosis of but not limited to periprosthetic fracture around other internal prosthetic joint, personal history of other mental and behavioral disorders, sequela, dementia,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-05-07 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, document review, and facility policy review, it was determined the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. Specifically, kitchen staff failed to: - perform hand hygiene between handling soiled and clean dishes, - maintain adequate sanitizer concentration in the low temperature dish machine, - discard expired food items, and - wear sufficient hair restraints while in the food preparation areas. In addition, the facility failed to ensure the microwave in the central supply room, used for residents' food, was clean. These deficient practices had the potential to affect all residents who receive food from the kitchen. Findings included: 1. A review of the undated policy titled, Preventing Foodborne Illness - Employee Hygiene and Sanitary Practices, revealed, Food Services employees shall follow appropriate hygiene and sanitary procedures to prevent the spread of foodborne illness. The policy indicated employees must wash their hands After handling soiled equipment…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-05-07 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, document review, and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure residents had a comfortable and homelike environment by consistently providing linens, towels, and washcloths on three of three halls (West Hall, East Hall, and Terrace Hall) reviewed for environmental concerns. This deficient practice affected all residents. Findings included: The facility's policy related to linens including towels and washcloths was requested from the Administrator on 5/4/23 and was not provided by the end of the survey. Observations on 5/2/23 at 8:15 a.m. of the linen carts on [NAME] Hall revealed one cart at the front entry to the hallway that was filled with bed linens but only one towel. Observations on 5/2/23 at 8:24 a.m. of the linen carts on East Hall revealed a cart at the entry of the unit that contained three fitted sheets, three flat sheets, three blankets, a few pillowcases, approximately five gowns, and no towels on the cart. During a group interview on 5/2/23 at 10:34 a.m. with nine residents, including R#117, R#106, R#116, R#26, R#66, R#98,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-05-07 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — patternImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, staff interviews, and facility policy review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure three of five sampled residents (R) (R#51, R#103, and R#113) reviewed for unnecessary medications were not prescribed psychotropic medications unless necessary to treat a diagnosed, specific condition. Specifically, the facility failed to monitor and document targeted behaviors for R#51, R#103, and R#113 while prescribed psychotropic medications. Findings included: A review of the facility's policy, titled, Unnecessary Drugs-Without Adequate Indication for Use, revised October 2022, indicated, It is the facility's policy that each resident's drug regimen is managed and monitored to promote or maintain the resident's highest practicable mental, physical, and psychosocial well-being free from unnecessary drug. The policy further indicated, 2. The attending physician will assume leadership in medication management by developing, monitoring, and modifying the medication regimen in collaboration with residents and/or representatives, other professionals, and the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-05-07 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, record review, interviews, and facility policy review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the proper labeling of drugs and biologicals and expired medications were removed from three of three medication rooms (West Unit Medication Room, East Unit Medication Room, and the Terrace Unit Medication Room); one of four medication carts (East Unit Medication Cart #1); and one of three central supply rooms (East Hall Supply Room). Findings included: A review of the facility's policy, titled, Medication Storage, revised December 2022 indicated, It is the policy of this facility to ensure all medications housed on our premises will be stored in the pharmacy and/or medication rooms according to the manufacturer's recommendations and sufficient to ensure proper sanitation, temperature, light, ventilation, moisture control, segregation, and security. 1. The [NAME] Unit medication room was observed on 5/3/23 at 9:33 a.m. with Unit Manager (UM) LL. Observations revealed an opened undated Trulicity Insulin Pen, an opened undated Ozempic (a noninsulin…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-05-07 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, interviews, observations, and facility documents and policy review, it was determined the facility failed ensure that one of 57 sampled residents (R) (R#379) was free from physical abuse by another resident. Findings included: A review of a facility policy titled, Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation, dated 10/1/22, indicated, It is the policy of this facility to provide protections for the health, welfare and rights of each resident by developing and implementing written policies and procedures that prohibit and prevent abuse, neglect, exploitation and misappropriation of resident property. Under a definitions section, the facility noted that willful means the individual must have acted deliberately, not that the individual must have intended to inflict injury or harm. The policy's Prevention of Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation section indicated the facility would implement policies and procedures to achieve, in part: D. The identification, ongoing assessment, care planning for appropriate interventions, and monitoring of residents with needs and behaviors which…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-05-07 · tag F0623 — isolatedProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, it was determined the facility failed to notify the ombudsman in writing when a resident was transferred or discharged from the facility for two of 57 sampled residents (R) (R#94 and R#85). Specifically, the ombudsman was not notified regarding emergency transfers to acute care facilities which were considered facility-initiated discharges. Findings included: An ombudsman notification policy was requested from the facility, but none was provided prior to the end of survey. 1. A review of an admission Record indicated the facility admitted R#94 on [DATE] with diagnoses that included cerebral infarction (stroke) and a tracheostomy. A review of a quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of [DATE], revealed R#94 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 10, which indicated the resident had moderate cognitive impairment. A review of an eInteract SBAR [situation, background, assessment, recommendation] Summary for Providers, dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-05-07 · tag F0625 — isolatedNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, record review, and facility policy review, it was determined that the facility failed to notify each resident of the facility's bed-hold and reserve bed payment policy before a hospital transfer for two of 57 sampled residents (R) (R#85 and R#94). Findings included: A review of a facility policy titled, Transfer or Discharge, Preparing a Resident for, dated [DATE], indicated 4. The business office is responsible for: a. informing appropriate departments of the resident's transfer or discharge; b. informing the resident, or his or her representative (sponsor) of our facility's readmission appeal rights, bed-holding policies, etc.; and c. others as appropriate or as necessary. A review of an undated facility policy titled, Bed Hold Policy, indicated, There may be times that the Resident is out of the Facility overnight, whether due to a hospital stay or for therapeutic leave of absence. Should this occur, the Resident may request that the Facility hold the Resident's bed during this time ('bed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-05-07 · tag F0644 — isolatedCoordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, staff interviews, and facility policy review, it was determined that the facility failed to refer a resident with newly evident or possible serious mental disorder for a Level II preadmission screening and resident review (PASARR) for one of 57 sampled residents (R) (R#103). Findings included: A review of the facility policy, titled, Resident Assessment-Coordination with PASARR Program, revised December 2022, indicated, This facility coordinates assessments with the preadmission screening and resident review (PASARR) program under Medicaid to ensure that individuals with a mental disorder, intellectual disability, or a related condition receives care and services in the most integrated setting appropriate to their needs. The policy further indicated a negative Level I screen Permits admission to proceed and ends the PASARR process unless a possible serious mental disorder or intellectual disability arises later. The policy indicated, PASARR Level II - a comprehensive evaluation by the appropriate state-designated authority (cannot be completed by the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-05-07 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to provide activity of daily living (ADL) task for two of 57 sampled residents (R) (R#104 and R#279) related to showers. Findings included: A copy of the facility's policy for ADLs and showering/bathing was requested from the Administrator on 5/4/23 and was not provided by the end of the survey. 1. A review of an admission Record indicated the facility admitted R#104 on 10/28/22 with diagnoses that included heart failure, right femur fracture, and generalized muscle weakness. Review of a quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 4/26/23, revealed R#104 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 11, which indicated the resident had moderate cognitive impairment. The MDS indicated the resident required limited assistance from staff with transfers, walking, eating, and toilet use; extensive assistance from staff with bed mobility, dressing, and personal hygiene; and was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-05-07 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to assess and monitor a pressure ulcer for one of three residents (R)(R#279) reviewed for pressure ulcers. Specifically, the facility failed to appropriately assess and monitor R#279's left heel wound, and document wound type, characteristics, measurements, healing, and response to treatment. Findings included: A copy of the facility's policy for pressure ulcer assessment and treatment was requested from the Administrator on 5/4/23 and was not provided by the end of the survey. Review of R#279's admission Record revealed the facility admitted the resident on 12/9/22 with diagnoses that included hidradenitis suppurativa (a long-term skin condition characterized by painful bumps under the skin), diabetes mellitus, end stage renal disease (ESRD), kidney transplant failure, and an acquired absence of right leg above the knee. Review of a quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 3/12/23, revealed R#279 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, indicating…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-05-07 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure medications were available from the pharmacy for one of three sampled residents (R#279) reviewed for medication administration. Findings included: The facility's policy on pharmacy services was requested from the Administrator on 5/4/23 and was not provided by the end of the survey. A review of R#279's admission Record revealed the facility admitted the resident on 12/9/22 with diagnoses that included bilateral absolute glaucoma. A review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 3/12/23, revealed R#279 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, which indicated the resident was cognitively intact. The MDS indicated the resident required extensive assistance with bed mobility, transfers, dressing, toilet use, and personal hygiene. A review of R#279's Care Plan, dated 12/12/22, indicated the resident was on antibiotic therapy related to a right eye infection. Interventions directed the staff to administer antibiotic medications as per…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-05-07 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure an accurate medical record was maintained for one of 57 sampled residents (R) (R#106) related to pre-admission screening and resident review (PASARR) Level II. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure the diagnosis for Depakote (medication used for bipolar disorder, seizures, and migraine headaches) use was correct. Findings included: The facility's undated policy, titled, Unnecessary Drugs-Without Adequate Indication for Use, indicated, 3. Documentation will be provided in the resident's medical record to show adequate indications for the medications' use and the diagnosed condition for which it was prescribed. A review of the significant change in status Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 3/22/23, revealed the facility admitted R#106 to the facility on [DATE]. The MDS revealed the resident had active diagnoses to include anxiety disorder and bipolar disorder. The MDS revealed the resident had…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-05-07 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — isolatedSet up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews, document review, and policy review, the facility failed to maintain an effective Quality Assurance Program. Specifically, the facility failed to act on available competency validation data to make improvements in staff competency related utilizing a mechanical lift. This deficient practice affected one of three sampled residents (R) (R#12) reviewed for accidents, with the potential to affect the remaining 36 residents who required the use of a mechanical lift for transfer. Findings included: A review of the Quality Assurance Performance Improvement [QAPI] Plan, dated 1/2/23, revealed objectives of the QAPI plan include, 1. Establish a facility-wide process to identify opportunities of improvement through continuous attention to quality of care, quality of life and resident safety. 2. Address gaps in systems or processes. 3. Ensure adequate provision of staffing, time, equipment, and technical training resources. 4. Establish clear expectations around safety, quality, rights, choice, and respect. The policy indicated, Our purpose is to provide quality care and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-05-07 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility failed to clean and store continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) equipment after use for one of two residents (R) (R#14) reviewed for respiratory care; and (2) failed to ensure three of five sampled residents (R) (R#51, R#103, and R#113) reviewed for unnecessary medications were not prescribed psychotropic medications unless necessary to treat a diagnosed, specific condition related to monitoring and documenting targeted behaviors for R#51, R#103, and R#113 while prescribed psychotropic medications. Findings included: 1. A review of a facility policy titled, Noninvasive Ventilation, dated November 2022, specified CPAP, or continuous positive airway pressure, is a respiratory therapy intervention use to provide a patent airway during periods of sleep apnea. It uses air pressure generated by a machine, delivered through a tube into a mask that fits over the nose or mouth. A review of an admission Record revealed the facility admitted R#14 on 3/25/23 with a diagnosis to include sleep apnea (a condition in which breathing stops and restarts while sleeping). A review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to EMPIRE CARE CENTERS — 20 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1 of 5 | 1.9 | -0.9 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 2.2 | -0.2 vs chain |
| Staffing | 1 of 5 | 1.5 | -0.5 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 4 of 5 | 3.0 | +1.0 vs chain |
The other 19 homes this chain runs (chain average 1.9★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EMPIRE GA 3 HOLDCO LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 05/01/2022 |
| ENSH GA 3 LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 50% | since 05/01/2022 |
| NMGA3 JV MEMBER LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 50% | since 05/01/2022 |
| DONATH, BARRY | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 05/01/2022 |
| HELLER, SHLOMO | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 05/01/2022 |
| EMPIRE CARE CENTERS LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 05/01/2022 |
| BURNEY, LINDA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 10/29/2025 |
| COLE, JUDELLIA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/22/2025 |
| ELLIS, RENEE | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 05/01/2022 |
| HARDY, LEANTHONY | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 05/01/2022 |
| JACKSON, VICTORIA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 05/01/2022 |
| KLINCZAR, CHRISTIE | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 05/01/2022 |
| LAMUYON, SHARON | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 05/01/2022 |
| NUSSBAUM, EPHRAIM | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 05/01/2022 |
| PATEL, NIPA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 05/01/2022 |
| SONE-EBELOUE, GLADYS | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 05/01/2022 |
| STOKLEY, CHARMAGNE | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/09/2025 |
| SWERDLOFF, ARYEH | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 05/01/2022 |
| TAYLOR, BASHA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 12/03/2024 |
| TOLBERT, MATTHEW | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 10/23/2023 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 36 rows in the source record cover these 20 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $941K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in GA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Georgia Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 115504. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-04-16, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.