Marietta Center For Nursing And Healing

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

55.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 337 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 47.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 104 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.47 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 78% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 31% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 154 beds and averages 144.0 residents a day — about 94% occupied, or roughly 10 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.27 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.36 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.82 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.93 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.40 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.39 to 0.28 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 63% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

30 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 17 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2023-10-19 · tag F0557 — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that three of 43 sampled residents (R) (R30, R24, and R4) were treated with dignity related to providing Activities of Daily Living (ADL) care. Psychosocial harm was identified for R30 related to her becoming tearful and expressing feelings of humiliation when she was ignored, and staff refused the resident incontinence care. Findings included: A review of the facility policy last updated December 2022 titled, Quality of Life-Dignity, documented each resident shall be cared for in a manner that promotes and enhances quality of life, dignity, respect, and individuality. Residents shall be always treated with dignity and respect. Treated with dignity means the resident will be assisted in maintaining and enhancing his or her self-esteem and self-worth. Staff shall always speak respectfully to residents. Demeaning practices and standards of care that compromise dignity is prohibited. Staff shall promote dignity and assist residents…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · G2023-10-19 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolated
  Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure that one of five residents (R) (R16) reviewed for misappropriation was free from misappropriation of their personal property. Psychosocial harm was identified when R16 revealed facility staff took her keys and went to her house without her permission causing her fear of retaliation if reported. Findings included: A review of R16's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed that R16 presented with a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14 out 15, indicating that R16 was cognitively intact. A review of the facility policy, titled, Abuse and Neglect and Exploitation procedure Policy and last revised [DATE], documented, Misappropriation of Resident Property means the deliberate misplacement, exploitation, or wrongful temporary, or permanent, use of resident's belongings or money without the resident's consent. Exploitation means taking advantage of a resident for personal gain using manipulation. The…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · Gcited before2023-10-19 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that five of 43 sampled residents (R) (R30, R24, R4, R25, and R31) were provided Activities of Daily Living (ADL) care. Psychosocial harm was identified for R30 related to her becoming tearful and expressing feelings of humiliation when she was ignored, and staff refused the resident incontinence care. Findings included: A review of the facility policy last updated December 2022 titled, Quality of Life-Dignity, documented each resident shall be cared for in a manner that promotes and enhances quality of life, dignity, respect, and individuality. Residents shall be always treated with dignity and respect. Treated with dignity means the resident will be assisted in maintaining and enhancing his or her self-esteem and self-worth. Staff shall always speak respectfully to residents. Demeaning practices and standards of care that compromise dignity is prohibited. Staff shall promote dignity and assist residents as needed by, promptly…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-29 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, staff interviews, record review, and review of the facility policies titled, Transmission-Based (Isolation) Precautions and Hand Hygiene, the facility failed to follow infection control protocols and precautions measures for one of eleven residents (R) (R2) with wounds. The deficient practice had the potential to spread microorganisms and infections.Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Transmission-Based (Isolation) Precautions date implemented 10/1/2022 and revised 9/12/2022 indicated under Policy, It is our policy to take appropriate precautions to prevent transmission of pathogens. f. The facility will have PPE (personal protective equipment) readily available near the entrance of the residence room and will don (put on) appropriate PPE before or upon entry into the environment of a resident on transmission-based precautions. Review of the facility policy titled, Hand Hygiene revised June 2025 indicated under Policy, staff will perform proper hand hygiene procedures to prevent the spread of infection to other personnel, residents, and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-06-15 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, staff interviews, and review of the facility policies titled Food Receiving and Storage and Refrigeration and Freezers, the facility failed to ensure opened food items in the dry storage area and walk-in refrigerator were labeled and dated, and failed to remove a dented can from the food storage rack to prevent usage. The deficient practices had the potential to place 117 residents who received an oral diet from the kitchen at risk of contracting a foodborne illness. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Food Receiving and Storage, issued April 2024, revealed at bullet point seven, All foods stored in the refrigerator or freezer will be covered, labeled, and dated. Review of the facility policy titled Refrigeration and Freezers, issued April 2024. revealed at bullet point seven, Use by or open dates will be labeled on food items once opened. Observation on 6/13/2025 at 8:24 am of the dry storage area revealed an open five-pound bag of egg noodles being stored with no open date. Continued observation of the dry storage area revealed a food…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-06-15 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — widespread
  Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, staff interviews, and review of the facility policy titled Disposal of Garbage and Refuse, the facility failed to ensure two of two dumpster's side doors were closed and failed to ensure the ground surrounding the dumpsters was free from trash debris. The deficient practice had the potential to promote the harboring of pests, insects, and other organisms and create the potential for disease transmission by pests and rodents. The facility census was 124 residents. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Disposal of Garbage and Refuse, revised April 2024, revealed at bullet point seven that refuse containers and dumpsters kept outside the facility shall be designed and constructed to have tightly fitting lids, doors, or covers. Containers and dumpsters shall be kept covered when not being loaded. Surrounding area shall be kept clean so that the accumulation of debris and insect/rodent attractions are minimized. Observation on 6/13/2025 at 9:10 am of the dumpster area revealed the facility had two medium-sized dumpsters for general trash.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-15 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, staff interviews, and record review, the facility failed to maintain safe water temperatures to ensure residents were free from potential accident hazards, as evidenced by water temperatures exceeding 120 degrees Fahrenheit (F) in one of five shower rooms (South Hall Shower Room). The deficient practice had the potential to place residents who use the shower at increased risk of burns. Findings include: Review of a facility-provided document titled Instructions Testing and Logging Water Temperatures revealed the document included instructions of 1. For burn prevention, federal guidelines advise that you keep domestic water temperatures below 120 degrees Fahrenheit, although this temperature can still cause burns if exposure reaches five minutes. Many states have even stricter standards that set maximum temperatures lower than 120 degrees Fahrenheit. Although 100 degrees Fahrenheit is considered a safe water temperature for bathing. Observation and interview with the Maintenance Director on 6/14/2025 at 9:12 am revealed that the water in the South Hall Shower…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-15 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, staff interviews, record review, and review of facility policies titled Personal Protective Equipment and Transmission-Based (Isolation) Precautions, the facility failed to protect residents from infection by not wearing personal protective equipment (PPE), when providing care to one of two residents (R) (R328) on Contact Precautions. The deficient practice had the potential to cause the spread of infections to other residents, staff, and visitors. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Personal Protective Equipment, revised January 2025, revealed under Policy: The facility promotes appropriate use of personal protective equipment to prevent the transmission of pathogens to residents, visitors, and other staff. Under Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines: All staff who have contact with residents and their environments must wear personal protective equipment as appropriate during resident care activities and at other times in which exposure to blood, body fluids, or potentially infectious materials is likely. Review of the facility…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-02-15 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, staff interviews, and review of the facility's policy titled, Use By Dating Guidelines, the facility failed to ensure food items were properly stored, labeled, and dated, and expired food items were disposed of in a timely manner. In addition, the facility failed to ensure the kitchen areas (tile and ceiling) were maintained in a sanitary condition free from debris, grease, and dirt build-up. The deficient practice had the potential to affect 123 residents receiving an oral diet. Findings include: Review of the undated facility policy titled Use By Dating Guidelines documented . In Dry Storage Areas all unopened items must be labeled with a receiving or delivery date. Once item opened, it must be dated with the open date and use by date. Refrigerate open items per guidelines. The tour of the facility kitchen on 2/13/2024 at 9:15 am with Dietary Manager (DM) KK revealed the following observations: Observation of the following items in the reach-in-refrigerator revealed a bag of French toast (cooked) dated 1/2/2024, a bag of garlic bread (uncooked removed from…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-02-15 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — widespread
  Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure that the dumpster area was maintained in sanitary condition as it relates to dumpster lids being secured tightly and fitted at all times The deficient practice had the potential to promote the harboring of pests, insects, and other organisms that could affect all residents in the facility. Findings include: Observation and interview on 2/13/2024 at 10:20 am of the facility dumpster with Dietary Manager (DM) KK revealed three of three dumpsters in the dumpster area were filled with trash to capacity. A closer observation of the dumpster lids revealed that each dumpster consists of two lids (a left lid and a right lid). All the lids were badly damaged, allowing trash exposure and preventing the trash from being securely contained. Three of three of the dumpsters had lids (either the right or left lid) that were folded downward/sunken into the dumpster resulting in large bags of trash and boxes piled high and resting on top of the lids. Three of three of the dumpster lids (either the right or left lid) were badly…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-02-15 · tag F0554 — pattern
  Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, resident and staff interviews, record review, and review of the facility policies titled, Resident Self-Administration of Medications and Medication Administration, the facility failed to ensure five of 41 sampled residents (R) (R22, R39, R90, R81, and R1) reviewed for self-administration of medications did not have medications stored at the bedside. This deficient practice had the potential to allow residents to administer the medications in an unsafe manner. Findings include: A review of the facility's undated policy titled Resident Self-Administration of Medication, revealed the Policy Statement: A resident may only self-administer medications after the facility's interdisciplinary team has determined which medications may be self-administered safely. 4. The results of the interdisciplinary team assessment are recorded on the Medication Self-Administration Assessment Form, which is placed in the resident's medical record. 7. Bedside medication storage is permitted only when it does not…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-02-15 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — pattern
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, resident and staff interviews, record review, and review of the facility policy titled, Oxygen (O2) Administration, the facility failed to change and date O2 tubing weekly for three of 41 sampled residents (R) (R36, R84, R54), to clean O2 and CPAP (continuous positive airway pressure device) filters for two of 41 sampled residents (R36 and R61), and to have orders for CPAP use for one of 41 sampled residents (R50). Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Oxygen Administration date reviewed/revised December 2022, revealed under Policy: Oxygen is administered to residents who need it, consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan and the residents' goals and preferences. Under the subsection titled Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines revealed under number one: oxygen is administered under orders of a physician, except in the case of an emergency. In such case, oxygen is administered and orders for oxygen are obtained…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-15 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, staff interviews, record review, and review of the facility policies titled, Hand Hygiene, PPE Source Control, Standard Precautions Infection Control, and Infection Prevention and Control Program, the facility failed to utilize personal protective equipment (PPE) properly in an isolation room for one of one resident (R) (R95) on transmission based precautions and failed to perform hand hygiene between residents when delivering resident meals to resident rooms for seven of eight residents on the East-C hall. The deficient practice had the potential to spread infection to other residents and staff. The facility census was 127 residents. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Hand Hygiene date reviewed/revised June 2023 revealed under Policy: All staff will perform proper hand hygiene procedures to prevent the spread of infection to other personnel, residents, and visitors. This applies to all staff working in all locations within the facility. Under the section titled Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines number one revealed staff will…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$7,901 in federal fines across 2 penalties.

• $3,950 — penalty dated 2023-10-19
• $3,951 — penalty dated 2023-10-19

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to EMPIRE CARE CENTERS — 20 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 8 rows in the source record cover these 6 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $2.8M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 20% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in GA