Douglasville Center for Nursing and Healing LLC
4028 Hwy 5, Douglasville, GA 30135 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 246 certified beds · (770) 942-7111 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0606) — most recent Jun 2025
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has 4 actual-harm citations
- a high number of inspection citations overall (48) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $13,787 in federal fines (most recent 2024-02-08)
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
- its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)
- nursing-staff turnover (58%) runs well above the national median (45%)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 2 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 2 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 2 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 3 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 1 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 6.7% | 15.3% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 8.2% | 5.6% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.3% | 0.9% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.7% | 2.5% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 0.0% | 11.3% | 6.5% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 4.5% | 3.2% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 10.3% | 15.2% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 18.7% | 20.5% | 18.9% | typical |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 49.5% | 95.0% | 95.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 12.9% | 5.6% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 22.0% | 15.8% | 21.2% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 22.4% | 19.9% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 3.7% | 2.6% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 48.7% | 78.4% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 24.8% | 25.0% | 22.6% | typical |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 13.8% | 11.6% | 12.0% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 2.40 | 2.15 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.40 | 1.90 | 1.80 | better |
* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
39.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 135 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 50.6% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 89 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.23 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 30% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 18% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 39.2%CMS range 29.5–49.5 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | worse than U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 12.6%CMS range 9.8–16.2 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 50.6% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 49.4% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 31.5% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 99.3% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 100.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 95.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 2.6% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 1.3% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 10.3%CMS range 7.0–13.4 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.12 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 246 beds and averages 210.5 residents a day — about 86% occupied, or roughly 36 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.71 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.32 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.40 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.42 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.83 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.38 to 0.18 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 58% is well above the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
48 citations, most serious first. The 14 most serious are shown; the remaining 34 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · G2025-10-30 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews, staff and resident interviews, and review of the facility policy Discharge and Transfer Policy, the facility failed to ensure that treatment was provided in a timely manner following a right hip fracture for one of three residents (R1). Actual harm was identified on 8/24/2025 when R1 fell and suffered a right hip fracture that was not recognized until 8/25/2025 when the resident was sent to the hospital and had to undergo surgery for an intertrochanteric fracture of the right hip.Findings include:A review of the facility policy titled Discharge and Transfer Policy, revised 7/18/2025, did not reveal details regarding emergency transfers.Review of the electronic medical record (EMR) for R1 revealed diagnoses including, but not limited to, cerebral infarction affecting the dominant right side; muscle weakness; Difficulty in walking; not elsewhere classified; altered mental status, and history of falling.Review of the most recent Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE]…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2023-10-03 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, review of the facility policy titled Comprehensive Person-Centered Care Plans, and resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to implement the care plan for two of 56 sampled residents (R) (R19 and R36). Actual harm occurred on 3/14/2023 when R19 sustained an acute fracture of the proximal fibular diaphysis after falling from the bed when one Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) failed to follow the plan of care for Activities of Daily Living (ADL) care interventions. Findings included: A review of the facility policy titled, Comprehensive Person-Centered Care Plans, dated Each resident will have a person-centered plan of care to identify problems, needs, strengths, preferences, and goals that will identify how the interdisciplinary team will provide care. Comprehensive Person-Centered Care Plan - contains services provided, preference, ability, goals for admission and desired outcomes, and care level guidelines. Pocket Care Guide - part of the Comprehensive Care Plan and used as the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2023-10-03 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that three of 54 sampled residents (R19, R40, and R36) were free of accidents related to not following the plan of care for fall risk for R19 and R36 and not completing neuro checks for R40. Also, the facility failed to store chemicals in a safe and secure manner to prevent accidents. Actual harm occurred on 3/14/2023 when R19 sustained an acute fracture of the proximal fibular diaphysis after falling from the bed when one Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) failed to follow the plan of care for ADL care interventions. Findings included: A review of the facility document titled, ACCIDENT & INCIDENT DOCUMENTATION & INVESTIGATION RESIDENT INCIDENT, dated October 2009, January 2012, July 2018, revealed the following: Accidents and/or Incidents involving resident care will be investigated and documented on the Resident Incident Report entry form in the Long Term Care (LTC) system. An incident is defined as an occurrence which is not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2023-10-03 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interviews, and review of the facility's policy titled Bowel Elimination Protocol the facility failed to implement interventions to prevent discomfort for one of 54 sampled residents (R) (R8). Actual harm was identified to have occurred on 6/28/2023 when R8 was sent out to an acute care hospital for fecal impaction. Findings included: A review of an undated facility's policy titled, Bowel Elimination Protocol revealed that it is the responsibility of nursing personnel to document, monitor, and implement appropriate measures relative to the management of bowel function. The bowel regimen will be initiated by the Licensed Nurse with the approval from the attending physician as indicated. A review of the medical record revealed R8 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included gastroparesis and end stage renal disease. A review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed R8 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 which…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-06-19 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — widespreadMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, resident and staff interviews, record review, and the review of the facility policies titled, Oxygen Safety and Safe and Homelike Environment, the facility failed to: (1) maintain the laundry services area in a clean, sanitary, and safe condition; (2) maintain the [NAME] Shower tile grout in a clean and sanitary condition; (3) secure empty oxygen tanks to prevent potential hazards; (4) maintain metal Intravenous (IV) stands in a clean and sanitary condition for two of three residents (R) (R22 and R13) reviewed for enteral feedings; and (5) repair leaking air conditioning units, resulting in basins being placed on the floor in two of two rooms observed (rooms [ROOM NUMBERS]) over multiple days. These deficient practices had the potential to increase the risk of infection transmission due to unsanitary environmental conditions and equipment, as well as increased risk of injury from environmental hazards, including slips, trips, and falls related to leaking units and unsecured oxygen tanks.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-19 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolatedKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to respect the right to personal privacy for two of three residents (R) (R34 and R235) reviewed for privacy. Specifically, respiratory treatments were conducted in public view without any privacy measures in place, which could have negatively affected the quality of life of affected residents. The facility also failed to ensure unauthorized family members did not have access to one of one sampled (R) (R132) current status, resulting in a breach of the resident's right to privacy and confidentiality. Findings include: 1. Review of R34's admission Record in the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) under the Profile tab revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of paraplegia, acute and chronic respiratory failure, and tracheostomy status. Review of R34's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 05/21/2026 in the EMR under the MDS tab revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-19 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, record review, and facility policy titled Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation, the facility failed to implement policies and procedures for ensuring the reporting of a reasonable suspicion of a crime and reporting of all alleged abuse violations to the State Agency (SA) for one of 11 residents (R) (R53) reviewed for abuse. The deficient practice had the potential for continued episodes of unreported abuse, which posed the potential for physical harm and/or mental anguish. Findings included:A review of R53's admission Record, located under the Profile tab of the EMR, indicated the resident was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of depression, altered mental status-unspecified, and cognitive communication deficit. A review of R53's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with a date of 03/10/2026, documented that the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12, indicating R53 was moderately cognitively impaired. A review of R30's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-19 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, record review, and review of the facility's policy, the facility failed to complete a thorough investigation of an allegation of sexual abuse for one of 11 residents (R) (R53) reviewed for abuse. The facility's failure to complete a thorough investigation placed residents at risk of being unprotected from abuse.Findings included:A review of R53's admission Record, located under the Profile tab of the Electronic Medical Record (EMR), indicated the resident was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of depression, altered mental status-unspecified, and cognitive communication deficit. A review of an Incident Report, dated 03/07/26 at 8:34 PM, provided by the facility, indicated, [R53] stated while she was sitting in the admission lobby area off of the [NAME] Unit[R30] approached her and made an inappropriate comment of a sexual nature. When asked if she was touched by the resident or if any physical sexual act occurred, R53 stated no. [R30] denied…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-19 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interviews, record review, and review of the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) Manual, the facility failed to ensure one of one resident, (R) (R233), had an accurately coded Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment. Failure to accurately code the MDS has the potential to result in inaccurate federal reimbursement and inaccurate resident assessment and care planning.Findings include: Review of R233's admission Record, located under the Profile tab of the electronic medical record (EMR), documented R233 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of dementia with behavioral disturbances. Review of a facility-provided document for R233 titled, Full QA (Quality Assurance) Report, dated 01/02/2026, documented the resident sustained an unwitnessed fall. The resident sustained bruising of her upper left arm and a laceration of her left eye. Review of R33's quarterly MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 02/10/2026 and located under the MDS tab of the EMR, indicated staff were unable to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-19 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, interviews, and review of the facility policy titled Activities of Daily Living (ADLs), the facility failed to ensure Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) were conducted for five of 61 sampled residents (R) (R47, R247, R200, R10, and R151). The facility failed to ensure timely incontinence care was provided for one resident (R47); ensure showers and/or baths were conducted for three residents (R247, R200, and R151); and ensure facial hair was trimmed and nails clipped for one resident (R10). This failure had the potential to compromise residents' hygiene and quality of life. Findings include: 1. Review of R47's admission Record located under the Profile tab of the electronic medical record (EMR) revealed R47 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included age related physical disability and bilateral primary osteoarthritis of the knee. Review of R47's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 03/23/2026 and located under the MDS tab of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-19 · tag F0809 — failed to serve meals on a reasonable schedule — isolatedEnsure meals and snacks are served at times in accordance with resident’s needs, preferences, and requests. Suitable and nourishing alternative meals and snacks must be provided for residents who want to eat at non-traditional times or outside of scheduled meal times.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, resident and staff interviews, record review, and review of the documented Dietary Meal Start Times, the facility failed to serve meals on time for ten residents (R) (R59, R117, R50, R183, R208, R29, R203, R56, R122, and R200) out of a total sample of 61. This failure had the potential to negatively affect 183 residents who were served meals that were prepared from the facility's kitchen. Findings include: 1. Review of the Monthly Resident Council Meeting Minutes, provided by the facility, revealed that during the 01/05/2026 meeting, residents voiced a concern that meals were being served late. During the Resident Group interview conducted on 06/17/2026 from 3:10 PM to 4:00 PM, a total of six residents participated, who were identified by the facility as reliable historians and alert and oriented. The six residents who participated included the following: Review of R59's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), located under the MDS tab in the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) and with an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-19 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure Respiratory Therapist changed Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) between residents (R) for tracheostomy care for R34 and R235; failed to ensure staff donned PPE when providing care to R251; failed to ensure staff changed gloves and perform hand hygiene during perineal care between removing soiled brief and applying clean brief and adjusting bed linens for R188 and failed to ensure R40's urinary catheter collection bag remained off the floor. The facility's failure to ensure proper infection control during care created the potential for cross contamination and infection for the total survey sample of 61. Findings include: 1. Review of R34's admission Record in the electronic medical record (EMR) under the Profile tab revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Paraplegia, acute and chronic respiratory failure, and tracheostomy status. Review of R34's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-27 · tag F0554 — isolatedAllow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interviews, record review, and review of the facility's policy titled, Self-Administration Protocol, the facility failed to adequately assess two of 72 sampled Residents (R) (R65, R54) for self-administration of medication. The deficient practice had the potential to allow access to medications otherwise not prescribed by a physician to other residents. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Self-Administration Protocol with a revised date of 8/2016 documented under Policy: Beside medication storage is permitted for residents who are willing and able to self-administer medication upon the written order of the prescriber, when it is deemed appropriate in the judgement of the facility's interdisciplinary resident assessment team, and in accordance with start law. Under the section Procedure: 1. If the resident wishes to participate, the interdisciplinary team (IDT) will complete Medication Self-Administration Assessment. 2. A written order for the bedside storage of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-27 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and staff interviews, the facility failed to maintain a clean, comfortable, homelike environment as evidenced by broken wall molding trim in three of 31 resident rooms (room [ROOM NUMBER], 320, and 324) on Unit 30. In addition, two wall tiles were broken in room [ROOM NUMBER]. Findings include: Observation of resident rooms beginning on 6/23/2025 at 10:00 am revealed broken wooden wall molding trim in three rooms (room [ROOM NUMBER], 320, and 324) on Unit 30. Additionally, two broken ceiling tiles were observed in room [ROOM NUMBER], one of the tiles was observed with a piece of paper towel inserted in the tile hole. Interview on 6/26/2025 at 2:45 pm with the Maintenance Director (MD) revealed that currently only the MD and one assistant were working in the Maintenance Department. The MD revealed they don't do environmental rounds; they recceived orders from the TELS system (system for maintenance requests/orders). The MD revealed that all nurses have access to this system to report…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 34 citations
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-27 · tag F0606 — failed to not employ staff found guilty of abuse — isolatedNot hire anyone with a finding of abuse, neglect, exploitation, or theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, staff interviews, and review of the facility's policy titled, Abuse Prevention, the facility failed to ensure that the hiring of staff was proceeded by a completed background check to ensure that individuals who have been hired have not been found guilty of abuse, neglect, exploitation, misappropriation of property or mistreatment in a court of law. Specifically, the Dietary Manager (DM) was allowed to continue working at the facility after two unsatisfactory criminal background checks. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Abuse Prevention with a revised date January 2025 documented under Policy: The facility is committed to protecting the residents from abuse by anyone including but not necessarily limited to: facility staff, other residents, consultants, volunteers, staff from other agencies providing services to our residents, family members, legal guardians, surrogates, sponsors, friends, visitors, or any other individuals. Under the section A, Steps to Prevent, Detect and Report: Screening . 3. The facility will pre-screen all…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-27 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interviews, record review, and review of the facility policy titled, Abuse Prevention, the facility failed to report injuries of unknown origin to the State Survey Agency (SSA) within the required timeframe for one resident (R) (R512) reviewed for abuse and neglect. The deficient practice had the potential for future unreported injuries of unknown origin, with the potential to affect residents' quality of life. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Abuse Prevention revised January 2025 revealed under Policy: The facility is committed to protecting the residents from abuse by anyone including, but not necessarily limited to: facility staff, other residents, consultants, volunteers, staff from other agencies providing services to our residents, family members, legal guardians, surrogates, sponsors, friends, visitors, or any other individual. Alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation or mistreatment, including injuries of unknown source and misappropriation of resident property, are reported immediately, but not later than 2 hours after…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-27 · tag F0644 — isolatedCoordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interviews, record review, and a review of the facility policy titled, PASRR (Preadmission Screening and Resident Review) Screening for Mental Disorder or Intellectual Disability, the facility failed to submit a PASARR Level II for one of two residents (R) (R153) reviewed for a mental illness diagnosis. This deficient practice had the potential to affect the appropriate level of care and services provided for R153. Findings include: A review of the facility policy titled PASRR Screening for Mental Disorder or Intellectual Disability dated July 2024, revealed the Policy stated, It I the policy of the Facility for each resident to be screened for Mental Disorder (MD) as defined or Intellectual Disability (ID) prior to admission and the individuals identified with MD or ID are evaluated by the State Mental Health Authority and receive care with services appropriate to their need. Referring all Level II with new MD, ID, or related conditions a review upon a significant change in status assessment. A…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-27 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, staff interviews, record review, and review of the facility policy titled, Oxygen Therapy, the facility failed to deliver oxygen (O2) per physician order for one of 37 residents (R) (R76) receiving O2 therapy. The deficient practices had the potential to cause respiratory distress. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Oxygen Therapy revised 8/14 revealed under Policy: Oxygen (O2) is administered to promote adequate oxygenation and provide relief of symptoms of respiratory distress. Under Procedure: Oxygen therapy is to be provided under the direction of a written physician's order. A Physician's Order for O2 therapy is to contain liter flow per minute via mask or cannula/timeframe. Review of the electronic medical record (EMR) for R76 revealed she admitted to the facility with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), cough, and pleural effusion Review of the Physician Orders for R76 dated 10/18/2024 revealed an order for continuous humidified Oxygen 2-4 L (liters) via NC (nasal canula) Observation on 6/23/2025 at 2:12…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-27 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — isolatedAdminister the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, staff interviews, and review of the facility's policy titled, Abuse Prevention, the facility administration failed to provide oversight to ensure one employee was free from adverse action on the criminal background check while working in the facility. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Abuse Prevention with a revised date January 2025 documented under Policy: The facility is committed to protecting the residents from abuse by anyone including but not necessarily limited to: facility staff, other residents, consultants, volunteers, staff from other agencies providing services to our residents, family members, legal guardians, surrogates, sponsors, friends, visitors, or any other individuals. Under Procedure: A. Steps to Prevent, Detect and Report: Screening .3. The facility will pre-screen all potential new employees, volunteers, and residents for a history of abusive behavior. Review of the Georgia Background Checks (G-CHECKS) dated 11/21/2022 and 2/11/2025 documented as unsatisfactory for the Dietary Manager (DM). During an interview on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-27 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, staff interviews, record review, and review of the facility's policy titled Telephone Orders, the facility failed to ensure accurate and complete medical records were maintained for one of three sampled residents (R) (R4). Findings include:Review of the facility's policy titled Telephone order updated 7/2025, revealed the Policy section stated, Orders received via telephone from a physician must be entered into the electronic software and co-signed by physician within the required time. The Procedure section included, 1. Whenever telephone orders are received from a physician, the order is to be entered into the electronic medical record and indicated as a telephone order.5. The telephone will be signed within the required time electronically or printed out for physicians who do not utilize electronic signatures. Post obtaining the MD signature, the order will be scanned into the electronic medical record following the active order of the electronic medical record guide (A.14d ). 6. A paper copy telephone order will be utilized if the electronic software is…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-27 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, staff interviews, record review, and review of the manufacturer's instructional sheet titled, How to clean and disinfect your Blood Glucose Meter, the facility failed to ensure proper cleaning technique for a glucometer during routine fasting blood sugar checks on one resident (R) (R44). The deficient practice had the potential to put residents at risk for a possible bloodborne pathogen. Findings include: Review of the Manufacturers' recommendation for the Assure Platinum blood glucose monitoring system on page 47 on cleaning and disinfecting guidelines revealed: Critical item-glucometer. Healthcare professionals should wear gloves when cleaning the Assure Platinum meter. Wash hands after taking off gloves. Contact with blood presents a potential infection risk. We suggest cleaning and disinfecting the meter between patient use. Cleaning and disinfecting can be completed by using a commercially available EPA Environmental Protection Agency)-registered disinfectant, detergent or germicide wipe. Many wipes act as both cleaner and disinfectant, though if blood is…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-12 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, staff interview, and review of the facility policy titled, Care Plans, the facility failed to include seizure medication in the care plan for one of nine sampled residents (R) (R1) reviewed. The deficient practice had the potential for R1 not to receive treatment and/or care according to their needs. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Care Plans revealed under Policy: Each resident will have a plan of care to identify problems, needs and strengths that will identify how the team will provide care. Review of the Medication Administration Record (MAR) form dated February 2025 indicated a medication order for carbamazepine suspension 100 mg (milligrams)/5 ml (milliliters). Give 10 ml via Peg-Tube (feeding tube in abdomen) every 12 hours related to Other Seizures - start date 01/06/2025 2100-D/C (discontinuation) date- 02/07/2025. Further review indicated an order for carbamazepine oral suspension 100 mg/5ml (carbamazepine). Give 10 ml via Peg-Tube every 12 hours for prophylaxis (preventative) relating to other Seizures. Start date 02/19/2025.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-12 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on complainant, family member and staff interviews, record review, and review of the facility policy titled, Prescriber Medication Orders, the facility failed to transfer a medication order and failed to give the medication as ordered for one of nine sampled residents (R) (R1). The deficient practice caused R1 not to receive ordered seizure medication. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Prescribed Medication Orders indicated under Procedure: . 2. A. Documentation: Each medication order is documented in the resident's medical record with the date, time, and signature of the person receiving the order. Review of the medical diagnosis for R1 indicated diagnoses but not limited to epilepsy, unspecified not intractable without status epilepticus (2/22/2025), iron deficiency anemia (2/22/2025), other seizures, unspecified, urinary tract infection, site unspecified (2/29/2025), chronic respiratory failure with hypercapnia (12/20/2024). Review of Nurses Note dated 2/14/2025 at 10:32:00 am indicated resident (R1) presents with HR of 140 BP (blood pressure) 140/68 T…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-10 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews, the facility failed to provide services with reasonable accommodation of needs for one of 28 sampled residents (R) (R6) related to scheduled appointments. Findings included: 1. A review of R6's undated admission Record revealed R6 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including but not limited to chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). A review of R6's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed R6 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, which indicated intact cognition. The MDS further revealed R6 was dependent on staff for toileting and chair/bed-to-chair transfers. An observation and interview on 10/7/2024 at 12:40 pm with R6 in her room revealed the resident was in bed and a large personal wheelchair was inside the room. R6 stated that she missed her appointment last week with her pulmonologist (lung doctor) because her wheelchair did not fit inside the transportation van. R6 further stated that there was a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-10 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to provide toileting assistance and assessment and treatment of a bleeding right leg to one of three sampled residents (R) (R7). Findings included: A review of the undated facility's policy and procedure titled, Subject: Abuse Prevention, indicated: Policy: The facility is committed to protecting the residents from abuse by anyone including, but not necessarily limited to: facility staff, other residents, consultants, volunteers, staff from other agencies providing services to our residents, family members, legal guardians, surrogates, sponsors, friends, visitors, or any other individual. Definitions: . f) Neglect: A failure of the facility, its employees, or service providers to provide goods and services necessary to avoid physical harm, mental anguish, emotional distress, or pain . IDENTIFICATION: . 2. The Executive Director and Director of Nursing Services must be promptly notified of suspected abuse or incidents of abuse. If such…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-10 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, resident and staff interviews, record review, and review of the facility policy titled Abuse Prevention, the facility failed to ensure that an allegation of sexual abuse was thoroughly investigated to rule out abuse for two of 28 sampled residents (R) (R11 and R12). Findings included: A review of the facility policy titled Abuse Prevention dated October 2022 included definitions of different types of abuse. The policy defined, Sexual Abuse: This included, but is not limited to sexual harassment, sexual coercion or sexual assault, or non-consensual sexual contact of any type with a resident. The policy also indicated the facility would initiate an investigation at the time of any finding of potential abuse or neglect allegation to determine cause and effect and provide protection to any alleged victims to prevent harm during the investigation. A review of R11's electronic medical record (EMR) revealed they were admitted to the facility with multiple diagnoses, one of which included…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-10 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, and resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure that the resident environment remained free of accident hazards for one of four residents (R) (R16) related to receiving adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents. Findings included: A review of the facility's undated policy titled INVACARE TOTAL LIFT noted the Invacare Total Lift is to be used for total lifts and/or to obtain a resident's weight from bed to chair, chair to bed, or from the floor. Maintain contact with the resident in order to guide or steady the resident during lift, as necessary. A review of the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed that R16 was admitted on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including bipolar disorder, current episode mixed, mild, unspecified psychosis not due to a substance or known physiological condition, type two (2) diabetes mellitus with hyperglycemia, other specified disorders of the skin and subcutaneous tissue, and unspecified open wound, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-08 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, staff interviews, and record review, the facility failed to maintain a clean, comfortable, homelike environment as evidenced by dirty PTAC (packaged terminal air conditioner) filters and broken slats, loose call light panels, and oversized ceiling light fixtures which covered or partially covered the return air vents in six of 141 occupied resident rooms (TC101, TC104, W31, W33, W34, and W36). Findings include: Review of the electronic system for maintenance and repair requests and tracking, instructions for HVAC [heating, ventilation, air conditioning]: Through-Wall Units: Clean air filters, #2. Remove air filter and inspect for cleanliness. If filter is dirty, either wash or replace depending on type of filter. If clean, reinstall filter. #6. At a minimum, air filters are to be replaced or thoroughly cleaned depending on type of filter every three months. Observation of resident rooms beginning on 2/7/2024 at 3:00 pm revealed dusty PTAC filters in rooms TC101, TC104, W31(+ broken slats), and W33. In addition, room W32 contained a loose emergency call light…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-08 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — patternProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 3. Review of R647's quarterly MDS dated [DATE] revealed section I (Active Diagnosis): chronic respiratory failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), obstructive sleep apnea, shortness of breath (SOB), section O (Special Treatments, Procedures, Programs): receives oxygen therapy. Review of the care plan for R647 dated 6/9/2021 revealed a Focus of the resident uses oxygen/nebulizer for COPD. The Goal was that R647 will have the effectiveness of oxygen/nebulizers through the next review on 7/21/2023. Monitor for signs and symptoms of respiratory distress, and monitor vital signs as needed or according to the facility's policy. A review of the physician's orders for R647 revealed an order dated 11/3/2023 for O2 at 2 LPM via NC. Observation on 2/6/2024 at 12:39 pm revealed R647's O2 was set at 5 LPM. Observation on 2/7/2024 at 12:00 pm revealed R647's O2 was set at 5 LPM on the concentrator's flow meter with no humidifier. Interview on 2/8/2024 at 10:40 am with LPN HH, she verified R647's O2 flowmeter was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-08 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, staff interviews, and record review, the facility failed to maintain dignity by ensuring a urinary catheter dignity bag was provided for two of 45 sampled residents (R) (R654 and R657). This failure had the potential to diminish the resident's quality of life in an environment that promotes the maintenance or enhancement of each resident's quality of life. Findings include: R657 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included but not limited to acute kidney failure. Review of R657's electronic medical record (EMR) revealed the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment was not yet completed due to the resident's recent admission date of 2/5/2024. Review of the physician's orders for R567 revealed an order dated 2/6/2024 for an indwelling catheter for neurogenic bladder. Observation on 2/6/2024 at 1:57 pm of R657 revealed an indwelling catheter bag on the side of the bed nearest the door without a dignity bag to cover it. Observation on 2/7/2024 at 1:15 pm of R657 revealed an indwelling catheter bag was visible from the hallway when the door was opened, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-08 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, resident and staff interviews, record review, and review of the facility's policy titled, Comprehensive Person-Centered Care Plans, the facility failed to develop and implement a care plan for two of 45 Residents (R) (R82 and R126). Specifically, R82 had no care plan for psychotropic medication and R126 had no care plan for Hospice care or for oxygen (O2). Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Comprehensive Person-Centered Care Plans documented under Procedure 5. For each problem, need, or strength, a resident-centered goal is developed. Goals should be measurable (i.e. walk from nurses' station to room by (date). R82 was admitted with diagnoses that included but not limited to depression and anxiety. Review of R82's care plan revealed there was no care plan in place for use of psychotropic medication. Interview on 2/8/2024 at 11:14 am with the MDS Coordinator regarding a care plan for R82 on use of psychotropic medication, she acknowledged that there was no care plan developed for use of psychotropic medication for R82. When asked what…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2023-10-03 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — widespreadProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observations, staff interviews, and the undated facility's policies titled, Controlled Medications Administrations and the undated Medication Administration General Guidelines revealed two of 56 sampled residents (R) (R8 and R7) medication was not administered timely. Findings included: A review of the undated facility's policy titled, Controlled Medications Administrations revealed When administering controlled medication, the authorized personnel record the administration on the MAR (medical administration record) eMAR (electronic medical administration record) and enters all of the following information on the Controlled Drug Record: a. Date and time of administration b. Amount administered c. Signature of the person preparing the dose, and d. Quantity reconciled. A review of the undated facility's policy titled Medication Administration General Guidelines revealed Medications are administered within the identified block of time per facility defined parameters. One hour before and one…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-10-03 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy and record review, observations and resident and staff interview the facility failed to follow infection control processes and procedures to prevent the spread of infections and contamination on four of five units (300 Unit, Central Unit, Magnolia Terrace, and Transition Pulmonary Unit). Findings included: A review of the facility policy titled, Standard Precautions, dated August 2003, October 2009, and September 2019. Standard precautions will be utilized to provide a primary strategy for the prevention of healthcare-associated agents among patients and healthcare personnel. Linen-handle, transport and process used soiled linen in a manner to prevent contamination of clothing and avoids transfer of microorganisms to the environment and others. #10 Follow procedures for disposal of regulated infectious waste when items are saturated with blood and meet the definitions of Regulated Infectious Waste. A review of facility policy titled, Coronavirus (COVID-19) dated June 2023, it shall be the policy…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-03 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to provide residents with a comfortable and homelike atmosphere on three of five Units (Transition Pulmonary Unit, Magnolia Terrace, and 300 Unit) related to not having an adequate supply of bed and bath linens, dirty rooms, used pest traps and trash on floors, soiled privacy curtains, and urine odors. Findings included: 1. During a tour of the facility on 9/11/2023 at 9:48 am, the Transition Pulmonary Unit (TPU) linen closet was observed to have 14 top sheets, nine bottom sheets, seven pillowcases, and four blankets. There were no washcloths, towels or gowns observed. During an interview on 9/11/2023 at 9:48 am, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) OO stated that the linen closet was the only linen closet for the unit, and they frequently run out of linen. During an observation on 9/11/2023 at 11:41 am, the 300 Unit linen closet was observed to have five blankets, 16 top sheets, 10 washcloths, one gown, and 24 fitted sheets. There were no towels observed.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-03 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to provide Activities of Daily Living (ADL) care to seven of 54 sampled residents (R) (R7, R21, R26, R38, R30, R39, and R15) related to scheduled showers/baths, incontinence care, and nail care. Findings included: A review of the facility policy titled, BATH/SHOWER - DEPENDENT., dated [DATE]; A bath (shower/tub) for cleanliness and comfort is scheduled at least weekly for each resident. A review of the facility policy titled, BED BATH, dated [DATE]; Bedfast residents will receive a bed bath daily. A bed bath also provides a mild form of exercise and allows observation of the resident to meet his psychosocial and physical needs. A review of the facility policy titled, Fingernails/Toenails Care dated [DATE], [DATE]; The purpose of this procedure is to clean the nail bed, to keep nails trimmed, and to prevent infections. Key Procedural: Nails can be partially cleaned during bath care. Nursing Assistants do not trim the nails of diabetic…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-03 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and review of the facility's policy for food and nutrition, the facility failed to ensure opened food items were securely wrapped, labeled, and dated, failed to discard food items by the expiration date, failed to store food items properly in the freezer, and failed to maintain a sanitary functional kitchen equipment in the kitchen. The facility census was 199. Findings included: A review of the kitchen manual titled Guideline & Procedure Manual 2016 Edition, revealed the following: Food shall be stored on shelves in a clean, dry area, free from contaminants. Food shall be stored at appropriate temperatures; use appropriate methods to ensure the highest level of food safety. General storage guidelines to be followed: a. Label food items held for longer than 24 hours. The label should include the name of the food, if not in original packaging, the date by which it should be sold, consumed, or discarded. c. Discard food that has passed the expiration date, and discard food that has been prepared in the facility after seven days of storing under proper…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-03 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — patternMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to maintain a Safe, Functional, Sanitary, and Comfortable Environment for three of five units (Magnolia Terrace, Central Unit, and 300 Unit). Findings included: On 9/11/2023 at 9:30 am, an observation on Magnolia Terrace of room [ROOM NUMBER] revealed a dirty floor to include food particles and dirt. Also, there was a fly strip that had numerous pests from the top of the strip to the bottom of it. On 9/11/2023 at 9:39 am, an observation on Magnolia Terrace of room [ROOM NUMBER] revealed a door missing off the closet. The privacy curtain was soiled with a brownish looking substance. The molding was missing off the bottom of the wall around the first bed. On 9/11/2023 at 9:40 am, an observation on Magnolia Terrace of room [ROOM NUMBER] revealed a dirty floor with various items on the floor to include clothes and trash. Privacy curtain was soiled with brownish color substance. There was a strong smell of urine in the room seeping out into the hall. On…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-10-03 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — patternMake sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program on two of five units (Magnolia Terrace and 300 Unit). Findings included: Observation on 9/12/2023 at 8:00 am of Magnolia Terrace revealed three rooms with gnats flying around residents faces while they were lying in bed. Observations on 300 Unit revealed two rooms that had fly tape hanging down from the ceiling on the right-side head of bed near the corner of the room. Also observed was another fly tape that had fallen and was lying coiled up on the floor. During an interview with R9's family member on 9/12/2023 at 1:33 pm, the family member stated that during visits with her grandmother she has seen large roaches in the room as well as flies. The family member stated that the facility was often dirty with overflowing trash cans and trash on the floor of the room. During an interview with LPN NN on 9/18/2023 at 10:30 am, the LPN stated that she has seen flies and the large bugs that everyone calls roaches. During an interview with Staff Member AA on 9/18/2023 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-03 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolatedHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy reviews, record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to provide residents with a grievance process that provided residents with the solutions for grievances that were filed for three of 54 sample residents (R) (R16, R17, and R18). Findings included: A review of the undated facility's policy titled, Grievance/Missing Property, revealed that the Social Service is responsible for notifying resident representative, family/next of kin and ombudsman, as appropriate, of resolution, Supervisory personnel shall be responsible for notifying resident of resolution and so indicate on grievance form, should resolution(s) not be satisfactory and/or grievance(s) reoccur, Social Services will notify the Grievance Official and Executive Director; and schedule a meeting with the involved parties. Grievances pertaining to missing items and/or property may also be presented to any staff member. If the missing item is not found on an initial search, the Missing Property Report will be completed and forwarded…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-03 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to fully investigate an allegation of abuse for one of 56 residents (R) (R32). Findings included: A review of the Abuse Prevention Policy (Review date of August 2014) under the section of definitions, sexual abuse is defined as, including, but not limited to sexual harassment, sexual coercion or sexual assault, or non-consensual sexual contact of any type with a resident. Under the section of investigation, the Abuse Prevention Policy states, the facility will initiate at the time of any finding of potential abuse or neglect an investigation to determine cause and effect and provide protection to any alleged victims to prevent harm during the continuance of the investigation. The Executive Director, or designee, shall report any allegation of abuse, neglect, or misappropriation of resident property as well as report any reasonable suspicion of crime in accordance with Section 150B of the Social Security Act to the Department of Health as required. A…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-03 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observations, interviews, and the facility's policy titled, Tracheostomy Care the facility Respiratory Therapist (RTs) failed to provide a safe and sanitary environment during tracheostomy (trach)care for three four residents (R) (R15, R31, and R33) reviewed for trach care. Findings included: A review of the undated facility's policy titled, Tracheostomy Care revealed .Residents who have a tracheostomy will have trach (change drain sponge stoma site and check inner cannula for obstruction) suction if indicated, trach ties will be changed once daily or prn [as needed]. Completed trach care will be performed daily (inner cannula changed or cleaned). Disposable inner cannulas will be changed once a day or prn for mucus plugs .Equipment: 1. Tracheostomy kit with pipe cleaners, brush, 4x4 dressings, slit 4x4 dressing trach ties, sterile gloves (two pairs) and Q-tips .Procedure: 4. Apply gloves 5. Keep one hand clean and one dirty. Your dominant hand should be clean. 1. A review of the medical…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-03 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, observations, and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure that one of six treatment carts (300 Unit Treatment Carts) were secured and inaccessible to residents. Findings included: A review of policy titled, MEDICATION STORAGE, dated April 2006; October 2009; Medication supply must be accessible only to licensed nursing personnel, or staff members lawfully authorized to administer medications. All drugs, treatments, and biologicals must be stored securely and following the manufacturer's labeled recommendations, or per facility policy. Medication rooms, carts, and medication supply rooms are kept locked at all times or must be attended by authorized personnel. An observation on 9/11/2023 at 10:05 am revealed a treatment cart parked in hallway outside of the rehabilitation therapy suite on 300 Unit, unattended and unlocked. The surveyor pulled a drawer to see if the cart was secured and found it to be unlocked and unattended. The bottom drawer contained a prescription medication of chlorhexidine, belonging to resident (R) 57 that was filled on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-07-28 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and policy review, the facility failed to provide a clean and sanitary environment for one of five nursing units (Magnolia [NAME]). Food, trash, dirt and debris were found on the floors in multiple rooms for multiple days, and bedside tables were found not cleaned for multiple days with dried food substances on bedside tables, creating an unsanitary environment. Finding include: Observation on 07/25/22 at 12:12 PM revealed room [ROOM NUMBER] with brown loose substance on the floor and a plastic spoon. room [ROOM NUMBER] window bed with food on the floor (appears to be salad) and trash on the floor (plastic wraps). room [ROOM NUMBER] with dirt and debris including what appears to be cotton on the floor. room [ROOM NUMBER] with trash (napkin and disinfectant wipe under the bed). The floor is very sticky. room [ROOM NUMBER] with food and debris (white specks) on the floor under the bed. room [ROOM NUMBER] with trash on the floor (plastic wraps). Observation on 07/25/22 at 2:57 PM…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-07-28 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to notify the physician/nurse practitioner timely of culture and sensitivity results for a urinary tract infection (UTI) requiring treatment for one of 35 sampled residents (R) (R22). Delay in notifying the physician/nurse practitioner timely resulted in a delay in initiating antibiotics. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Laboratory Test, revised November 2017, revealed . The Physician or physician extender will be promptly notified of abnormal results according to facility policy . Review of the facility's policy titled, Notification of a Change in Resident's Status, revised November 2017, revealed The attending physician/physician extender (Nurse Practitioner, Physician Assistant, or Clinical Nurse Specialist) and the resident representative will be notified of a change in the resident's condition . Guidelines for notification of physician . abnormal lab findings. During an observation on 07/25/22 at 1:28…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-07-28 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the accuracy of Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments for two of 35 sampled residents (R) (R189 and R205). The facility failed to accurately assess R205's catheter status and failed to allow R189 to complete the section for preferences and customary routine activities (section F). This failure placed the residents at risk for a decreased quality of life. Findings included: Review of the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) Manual 3.0, dated 10/2019 revealed, . If an MDS assessment is found to have errors that incorrectly reflect the resident's status, then that assessment must be corrected. Section F: Preferences for Customary Routine and Activities . The intent of items in this section is to obtain information regarding the resident's preferences for his or her daily routine and activities. This is best accomplished when the information is obtained directly through the resident . Nursing homes should use this as a guide to create an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-07-28 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff maintained appropriate infection control measures for the safe handling and monitoring of respiratory equipment for three residents of three residents (R) (R101, R64, and R13) reviewed for respiratory care in a total sample of 69 residents. Findings include: 1. Record review of the physician order tab located in electronic medical record (EMR), revealed R101 was admitted by the facility on 10/24/20 with diagnoses to include cerebral infarction, dysphagia, cerebral ischemia, cervical disc degeneration, acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, acute diastolic congestive heart failure, mild intermittent asthma with acute exacerbation, and dependence on supplemental oxygen. Review of the Physician Order, dated 07/30/21, indicated, Resident was ordered to be placed on 2liters of oxygen via nasal cannula continuous. During the initial tour of the facility on 07/25/22 at 12:00 PM, R101 was observed to be receiving oxygen per nasal cannula at 2liters per minute, the nasal cannula tube was dated for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-07-28 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolatedProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure the kitchen was maintained in a sanitary manner to prevent the potential spread of foodborne illness to all residents. Clean serving pans were observed to be stacked wet. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Dishwashing: Machine Operation, dated 2016, revealed, .use clean, washed hands to pull out clean racks, and allow to air dry before putting dishes away for storage. During an initial tour of the kitchen on 07/25/22 at 11:56 AM, an observation was made of clean ready-for use metal serving pans. The top pan on four of the stacks of clean pans was observed to have moisture accumulated. Interview with Dietary Aide (DA) 1 and the Dietary Manager during the initial tour, DA1 stated the pans had been washed that morning via the automatic dish machine. DA1 and the Dietary Manager confirmed that dishes should be allowed to dry before being stacked for use. The Dietary Manager stated that a new employee had been in charge of putting away clean dishes from the dish machine…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-07-28 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolatedMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to provide a safe, functional, sanitary, and comfortable environment for one of four survey units. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure the resident's rest rooms floor tiles, ceiling tiles, and toilets were in good repair. Findings include: During the surveyor's initial tour of the Magnolia Terrace hallways on 07/25/22 at 2:05 PM the following concerns were observed in the bathroom in room [ROOM NUMBER] - the bathroom floor was observed to be very darkly discolored, two broken tiles were observed on the floor, the toilet bowl screws to the floor were not covered and exposed, the right screw was observed to be approximately 2 inches and the left screw was observed to be approximately one inch in length. Both toilet bowl screws were observed to be red in color and rusty. The ceiling tiles were observed to be discolored with holes observed around the fire sprinkler on the ceiling. Observation of the bathroom in room [ROOM NUMBER] on 07/25/22 at 12:25 PM…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$13,787 in federal fines across 3 penalties.
- $4,017 — penalty dated 2024-02-08
- $4,885 — penalty dated 2023-10-03
- $4,885 — penalty dated 2023-10-03
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to EMPIRE CARE CENTERS — 20 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1 of 5 | 1.9 | -0.9 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 1 of 5 | 2.2 | -1.2 vs chain |
| Staffing | 2 of 5 | 1.5 | +0.5 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 2 of 5 | 3.0 | -1.0 vs chain |
The other 19 homes this chain runs (chain average 1.9★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TARA GA HOLDCO LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 11/01/2025 |
| HELLER, SHLOMO | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 07/06/2026 |
| NUSSBAUM, EPHRAIM | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 11/01/2025 |
| EMPIRE CARE CENTERS LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 11/01/2025 |
| CAMPBELL, SHELIA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 11/01/2025 |
| DONATH, BARRY | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 11/01/2025 |
| ELLIS, RENEE | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 11/01/2025 |
| HARDY, LEANTHONY | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 11/01/2025 |
| JOSEPH, CHRISTANE | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 11/01/2025 |
| OATES, MARCUS | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 11/01/2025 |
| PAEZ, VICTOR | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 11/01/2025 |
| SCHALLER, JENNIFER | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 11/01/2025 |
| SONE-EBELOUE, GLADYS | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 11/01/2025 |
| SWERDLOFF, ARYEH | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 11/01/2025 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 30 rows in the source record cover these 14 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 74% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $2.3M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 10% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in GA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Georgia Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 115273. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-06-27, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.