Harmony Health and Rehabilitation

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Met the expected recovery: 46.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 26 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.19 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 20% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 17% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 167 beds and averages 88.2 residents a day — about 53% occupied, or roughly 79 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.49 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.47 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.00 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.15 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.62 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.53 to 0.30 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 54% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

22 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 10 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2025-10-30 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, record review and review of the facility's policy titled Comprehensive Care Plans, the facility failed to follow the care plan interventions related to falls for one of four Residents (R) (R1) Actual harm occurred on 10/2/2025 when R1 who required two person assist with Activities of Daily Living (ADL) care rolled out of bed onto the floor during incontinent care that was being provided by one Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA). As a result of the fall, R1 sustained a distal fracture of left femur and a fracture of the lower end of the right tibia Findings include:A review of the facility's policy titled Comprehensive Care Plan dated 6/2/2025 under Policy revealed, It is the policy of this facility to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with resident rights, that include measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs and ALL services that are identified in the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · Gcited before2025-10-30 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, record review and review of the facility's policy titled Incident and Accidents, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision to prevent accidents for one of four residents (R) (R1) reviewed for falls. Actual harm occurred on 10/2/2025 when R1 who required two person assist with Activities of Daily Living (ADL) care rolled out of bed onto the floor during incontinent care that was being provided by one Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA). As a result of the fall, R1 sustained a distal fracture of left femur and a fracture of the lower end of the right tibia.Findings include:A review of the facility's policy titled Incidents and Accidents dated 4/1/2025 under Policy revealed, It is the policy of this facility for staff to utilize the Risk Management porta [sic] to report, investigate, and review any accidents or incidents that occur or allegedly occur, on facility property and may involve or allegedly involved a resident. Under the Compliance Guidelines section revealed,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-05 · tag F0582 — isolated
  Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interviews and record review, the facility failed to provide Form CMS 10055, Skilled Nursing Facility Advance Beneficiary Notice (SNFABN), in a timely manner to two of three sampled residents(R) (R13 and R73) reviewed for liability notices. This failure prevented the residents or their responsible parties from having the ability to make an informed decision regarding the cost of continued therapy services.Findings include:1. Review of R13's electronic medical record (EMR) admission Record located under the Profile tab indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE].Review of R13's document provided by the facility titled, Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage indicated R13's skilled therapy services would end on 12/10/2025.Review of R13's SNF/ABN, provided by the facility indicated that R13 signed the SNF ABN on 12/22/2025. The form indicated that the resident's signature acknowledged receipt of and understanding of the notice eleven days after therapy services ended.Review of R13's EMR…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-05 · tag F0628 — isolated
  Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interviews, and review of the facility policy titled Bed Hold Notice Upon Transfer the facility failed to notify the ombudsman and to provide a resident and their representative with the required written transfer and bed-hold notices following an emergency hospital transfer for one of two sampled residents (R) (R87). This failure limited the residents' and representative's ability to understand appeal rights and access ombudsman information, placing them at risk for potential denial of readmission.Findings include:Review of the admission Record located in the electronic medical record (EMR) under the Profile tab revealed that R87 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was readmitted on [DATE]. R87 had diagnoses including osteomyelitis (bone infection) and acquired absence of the left foot (amputation).Review of R87's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 01/21/26, located in the EMR under the MDS tab revealed a Brief Interview for…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-05 · tag F0655 — isolated
  Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, and staff interviews, the facility failed to complete a baseline care plan for two of 27 sampled residents (R) (R85 and R29). This failure had the potential to result in the residents' medical, nursing, mental, and psychosocial needs not being met, increasing the risk for adverse outcomes.1.Review of R85's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) located under the Minimum Data Set (MDS) tab revealed a revealed an admission date of 10/31/2025. Review of the EMR located under the Evaluation tab revealed no documentation that R85's base line care plan had been completed. Interview on 03/03/2026 at 4:05 PM the MDS Coordinator (MDSC) stated that it is the nurse's responsibility to complete the base line care plan at the time of admission. The MDSC also stated that it does not look like the baseline care plan for R85 was completed. Interview on 03/03/2026 at 4:15 PM with the Administrator stated that R85's base line care plan was not done. The Administrator confirmed that the baseline care plan would be…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-05 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
  Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observations, staff interviews, and review of the facility's policy titled Hemodialysis, the facility failed to ensure safe and coordinated dialysis care for one of one sampled resident(R)(R87). Specifically, the facility did not complete required pre and post dialysis assessments, did not maintain effective communication with the contracted dialysis provider, and did not have a formal written contract or agreement with the dialysis agency responsible for providing services to the resident. These failures placed the R87 at risk for compromised health, safety, and continuity of care.Findings include:Review of the admission Record, located in the electronic medical record (EMR) under the Profile tab revealed that R87 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of end stage renal disease and dependence on renal dialysis.Review of R87's Care Plan located in the EMR under the Care Plan tab revealed a Focus area revised 07/03/2025, [R87] needs dialysis type hemo r/t…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-07-02 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, staff interview, and review of the facility's policy titled Documentation of Wound Treatments, the facility failed to ensure the medical record documentation was completed and/or accurate for three of three residents (R) (R1, R3 and R4) reviewed for pressure ulcers from a total sample of nine residents. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Documentation of Wound Treatments dated 9/1/2024 under Policy revealed, The facility completes accurate documentation of wound assessments and treatments, including response to treatment, change in condition and changes in treatment. Wound treatments are documented at the time of each treatment. If no treatment is due, an indication on the status of the dressing shall be documented each shift (i.e., clean, dry, intact). 1. Review of clinical records revealed R1 was admitted to the facility with the following diagnoses but not limited to: congestive heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, hypertension, atherosclerosis, morbid obesity, and peripheral vascular disease. Review of R1's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-01-08 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, staff interviews, and review of the facility's policy titled, Cleaning Instructions: Ice Machine and Equipment, the facility failed to ensure the ice machine was maintained in a clean and sanitary condition and failed to ensure staff wore appropriate head covering in the food service area. This deficient practice had the potential to affect 82 of the 85 residents receiving an oral diet. Findings include: Review of the facility's undated policy titled, Cleaning Instructions: Ice Machine and Equipment revealed the purpose was, to ensure that ice machine and equipment (scoops and receptacles that are used to hold or transport ice) will be cleaned and sanitized on a regular basis. Procedures explained: 2. Wash the interior thoroughly using a detergent solution. Rinse and drain the interior with clean hot tap water. 6. Clean the exterior of the machine with detergent solution daily. Rinse and allow to air dry. Clean the area underneath and around the machine. Observation on 1/7/2025 at 11:45 am with the Dietary Manager upon inspection of ice machine in the main…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-01-08 · tag F0945 — failed to train staff on abuse prevention — widespread
  Include as part of its infection prevention and control program, mandatory training that includes written standards, policies, and procedures for the program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on staff interviews, record review, and review of the facility's policy titled, Annual Inservice Education for Long Term Care 2024, the facility failed to establish, implement, and sustain a comprehensive training program for all staff that would include education on standards, policies, and procedures for infection prevention. This deficient practice had a potential to increase the risk of healthcare-associated infections and compromise the quality of care provided to the residents of the facility. Findings include: Review of the facility's undated policy titled, Annual Inservice Education for Long Term Care 2024, revealed that the annual education calendar is to be implemented each year as scheduled, along with any additional educational needs that are identified. The calendar provides a monthly education schedule for 2024, covering a variety of topics, including infection control and prevention, among others. The facility was unable to provide the survey team with documentation of in-service training provided to staff. Interview on 1/6/ 2025, at 4:50 pm with the Director of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-08 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and review of the facility's policy titled, Resident Rights and Dignity Management, the facility failed to ensure one of 13 residents (R) (R17) was able to exercise their right to smoke. Findings include: Review of facility's policy titled, Resident Rights and Dignity Management, dated October 2023, in section self-determination and participation standard revealed, our facility respects and promotes the right of each resident to exercise his/her autonomy regarding what the resident considers to be important facets of his/her life . 3. The resident shall be encouraged to make choices about aspects of his/her life in the facility including: roommates, smoking. Review of the clinical record revealed that R17 was admitted to the facility with the diagnoses of but not limited to, intracranial injury without loss of consciousness, schizoaffective disorder bipolar, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and emphysema. Further record review revealed completed smoking and safety…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-08 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interviews, record reviews, and review of the facility's policies titled, Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI)/Care Planning Management, and Process for Completing the MDS, CAAs and Care plans, the facility failed to ensure that the care plan was followed for three of 15 residents (R) (R24, R7, and R54). Specifically, the facility failed to ensure the care plan was followed for R24 for receiving oxygen therapy, for R7 related to positioning of an indwelling catheter, and for R54 for behaviors related to oxygen use. This deficient practice had the potential for R24, R7, and R54 to not have the care provided to them according to their individual care needs. Findings included: Review of the undated facility's policy titled, Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI)/ Care Planning Management, revealed that the Comprehensive Care Plan is completed within seven (7) days after the care area assessments (CAAs) are completed and reviewed quarterly thereafter. If modifications, deletions, additions…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-08 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interview, and record review, the facility failed to properly administer respiratory inhalant medications for one of 15 residents (R) (R24) receiving inhaled respiratory medication. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure that the Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) properly administered inhaled medications by having the resident rinse their mouth after receiving inhaled respiratory medication. Findings include: A facility policy for administrating inhaled medications was requested. There was no policy provided by the facility. Observation on 1/7/2025 at 9:32am to 9:40 am revealed Registered Nurse (RN) EE preparing medications for R24 that included but not limited to Trelegy inhaler. RN EE performed hand hygiene, entered room of R24, and handed the inhaler to the resident. RN EE instructed R24 to take in one puff, hold her breath for as long as she could before removing the inhaler and exhaling. LPN EE then had the resident take her pills. She performed hand hygiene before leaving the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$4,017 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $4,017 — penalty dated 2024-12-19

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to BRIGHTON HEALTHCARE — 8 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 11 rows in the source record cover these 7 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 95% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $879K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 10% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in GA