Glenwood Health and Rehabilitation

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.30 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 49% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 25% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 62 beds and averages 43.6 residents a day — about 70% occupied, or roughly 18 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.28 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.34 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.83 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.11 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.34 on weekdays — 7% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.34 to 0.34 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 63% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are unchanged from the previous inspection. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

19 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 8 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2023-07-23 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
  Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, staff and resident interview, and review of facility policy titled Pain Management, the facility failed to stop and address one resident's expression of pain during wound treatment, resulting in harm for one resident (R#39) of 15 sampled residents. Actual harm was identified on 7/22/23 when Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) AA failed to administer pain medication to R#39 prior to providing wound care and upon R#39's nonverbal expressions of and verbalizing of pain, which resulted in severe pain during the treatment for R#39. Findings include: A review of the facility policy titled, Pain Management, dated 8/21, revealed: Purpose: To provide compassionate, appropriate assessments and interventions to control resident's pain using appropriate pain management techniques. A medical record review revealed that R#39 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including but not limited to acquired absence of right leg below knee, infection following a procedure, and other surgical site,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-03-08 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, staff interviews, and review of the facility policy titled Food Safety Requirements, the facility failed to ensure items stored in the cooler and dry food storage area were labeled, dated, and not beyond their expiration date. The facility also failed to ensure that items in the dry storage area were labeled with a use by date. In addition, the facility failed to ensure that staff hair nets covered all hair, logged steamtable food temperatures, kept food off floor for storage, and had education on how to use the 3-compartment sink. This deficient practice had the potential to adversely affect 44 of 44 residents receiving an oral diet. Findings include:Observation and interview on 03/06/2026 at 7:53 AM, the initial kitchen tour with the Dietary Manager and revealed the following observations:In the dry storage area, there were multiple cans of tuna that had an in date of 03/03/2026 but no use by date.In the dry storage area, there was a box of shredded wheat cereal with an expiration date of 10/2026, but there was no date to indicate when the box was opened.In…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-08 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
  Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, staff interviews, and review of facility documents, the facility failed to ensure that puree menu serving sizes were followed to provide the correct nutritional value for one of one resident (R) who received a pureed meal. This deficient practice placed the resident receiving pureed meals at risk for inadequate caloric intake, unintentional weight loss, and potential medical complications related to insufficient nutrition.Findings Include: Review of the menu for 03/07/2026 revealed that the supper meal included lasagna Italian style, tossed salad with dressing, breadsticks, chocolate pudding, 2% milk, coffee/tea, and margarine.Review of the pureed menu with serving sizes for the supper meal on 03/07/2026 revealed a suggested 6 oz serving portion of lasagna.Observation and interview on 03/07/2026 at 4:26 PM of the pureed preparation for supper with [NAME] BB revealed that she used 11/2 spatulas to portion out the lasagna for the pureed meal. [NAME] BB was observed using a spatula to scoop one full spatula of lasagna, followed by a smaller portion on the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-08 · tag F0569 — isolated
  Notify each resident of certain balances and convey resident funds upon discharge, eviction, or death.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, staff interviews, and the facility policy titled Residents' Personal Funds, the facility failed to notify six of 44 sampled residents and/or the residents' (R)responsible parties (R12, R32, R20, R34, R5, R15) when the residents' personal funds were within $200 of the Social Security Income (SSI) resource limit. The facility's failure to provide timely notification placed residents at risk of exceeding resource limits required for maintaining Medicaid eligibility during the renewal period. Review of the facility policy titled Resident Personal Funds, implemented on 12/29/2025, documented the following:Policy: The resident has a right to manage his or her financial affairs, including the right to know, in advance, what charges a facility may impose against a resident's personal funds. Notice of Citation Balances: The facility must notify each resident who receives Medicaid benefits when the amount in the resident's account reaches $200 less than the Supplemental Security Income (SSI) resource limit for one person.Record review revealed no documented evidence…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-08 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interviews, and review of the policy Safe and Homelike Environment, the facility failed to ensure a homelike environment for one of 44 sampled resident rooms (room [ROOM NUMBER]).Findings Include:Review of the policy Safe and Homelike Environment documented that, Policy: In accordance with residents' rights, the facility will provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, allowing residents to use their personal belongings to the extent possible. This includes ensuring that the resident can receive care and services safely and that the physical layout of the facility, both inside and outside, maximizes resident independence and does not pose a safety risk. Environment refers to any area in the facility that is frequented by residents, including (but not limited to) resident rooms, bathrooms, hallways, dining areas, lobby, outdoor patios, therapy areas, and activity areas.Observation on 03/06/2026 at 9:45 AM of room [ROOM NUMBER] revealed that the ceiling tiles had…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-08 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and review of facility policy titled Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation, the facility failed to ensure that one of three residents (R ) (R38) reviewed for free from verbal and physical abuse. Findings includeReview of Facility Incident Report Form dated 11/26/2025 regarding resident-to-resident abuse for an incident on 11/26/2025 between R44 and R38. The details of the report indicated R44 verbally and physically assaulted R38 while on the smoking porch. R44 struck R38 in the head repeatedly resulting in R38 falling and hitting his head on the ground.Record review revealed R38 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis that included but not limited to Alzheimer's Disease with late onset, psychotic disturbance mood disturbance and anxiety.Review of Progress Note dated 11/26/2025 indicated that R38 was walking up the hall when another resident (R44) began to hit R38 in the face before staff were able to intervene by standing between the two residents. R38 was assessed by…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-08 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, record review, staff interviews, and the facility's Catheter Care policy, the facility failed to ensure that urinary drainage tubing was kept uncoiled to allow unobstructed urine flow and prevent tension for one resident (R) (R49) out of three reviewed for catheter care. This deficient practice had the potential to increase R49's risk for a urinary tract infection.Findings include:Record review of the policy titled Catheter Care (dated 09/26/2025). It is the policy of this facility to ensure that residents with indwelling catheters receive appropriate care and maintain their dignity and privacy when indwelling catheters are in use.Record review of the electronic health record (EHR) for R49 revealed the following diagnoses but not limited to urinary retention, pressure ulcer of sacral stage 4, and dementia.Record review of R49's EHR Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment (dated 02/24/2026) revealed for Section C (Cognitive Patterns) a Brief Interview Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14. Section H (Bowel and Bladder) assessed requirement for catheter…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-09-11 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, staff interviews, record reviews and review of the facility policy titled, Food Safety Requirements, the facility failed to prepare and store food in accordance with professional standards of food service safety. Specifically, the facility failed to hold hot foods' temperatures appropriately prior to a meal service, failed to monitor the temperatures of hot foods being held prior to serving, and failed to remove decayed foods from refrigeration. The deficient practices had the potential to affect all 43 residents who received food from the facility's kitchen.Findings include:Review of the facility policy titled, Food Safety Requirements, implemented 6/2/2025 revealed, Food will be properly stored, prepared and distributed in a palatable manner within the 14-hour service window in accordance with standard and federal guidelines to ensure the nutritional needs of every resident are met. The policy revealed, 3. Facility staff shall inspect all food, food products, and beverages for safe transport and quality upon delivery/receipt and ensure timely and proper…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-09-11 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on staff and resident interviews, record review, review of the facility document titled, Resident Grievance/Concern/Complaint Report, and review of facility policy titled, Resident and Family Grievances, the facility failed to provide written grievance decision responses for two out of six residents (R) (R3 and R4) reviewed for grievances. Findings include:Review of the facility policy titled Resident and Family Grievances, implemented 9/1/2024, indicated, It is the policy of this facility to support each resident's and family member's right to voice grievances without discrimination, reprisal or fear or [sic] reprisal. The policy revealed, 10. Procedure included g. In accordance with the resident's right to obtain a written decision regarding his or her grievance, the Grievance Official or designee will issue a written decision on the grievance to the resident or representative at the conclusion of the investigation. The written decision will include at a minimum:i. The date the grievance was received.ii. The steps taken to investigate the grievance.iii. A summary of the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-11-10 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, staff interviews, and review of the facility's policies titled, Food Storage and Sanitation/Infection Control, the facility failed to remove food items by the discard date; failed to label and date food items for storage; failed to remove dented food cans; failed to store food items off the floor; and failed to maintain food temperatures above 135 degrees on the steam table to prevent food borne illness. The deficient practice had the potential to affect 42 residents who received an oral diet and were served food from the kitchen. Findings included: Review of the facility's policy titled Food Storage revealed leftover food is stored in covered containers or wrapped carefully and securely. Each item is clearly labeled and dated before being refrigerated. Review of the facility's policy titled Sanitation/Infection Control revealed all potentially hazardous foods are kept at an internal temperature of 45 degrees F (Fahrenheit) or lower-, or 140-degrees F or higher while being held and served. 1. Observation on 11/8/2024 at 8:25 am of the walk-in refrigerator…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-10 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interviews, review of facility documents, and review of a job description titled, Plant Operations Manager, the facility failed to ensure the resident's living area was clean and in good repair for seven of 14 rooms (Rm) on the 100 hall (Rm 108, 109, 110, 111, 112, 113 and 114), and the facility also failed to ensure that two of two shower rooms were free of clutter and in good repair. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure RM [ROOM NUMBER], 111, 112, and 113 had clear running water streaming from the bathroom sink faucet, and that RM [ROOM NUMBER], 110, and 114 were in good repair as evidenced by missing floor tiles in the bathroom and missing base boards on the wall in RM [ROOM NUMBER]. Findings included: Review of the facility documents titled, Task Due this week revealed a list of duties under Category, that included water temperatures-Test and log the hot water temperatures, and Rooms-room inspections. Review of the job description for Plant Operations Manager included…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to BRIGHTON HEALTHCARE — 8 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 11 rows in the source record cover these 7 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 89% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $509K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 13% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in GA