River Bend Health and Rehabilitation
213 Richmond Hill Drive, Asheville, NC 28806 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 100 certified beds · (828) 254-9675 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- CMS has flagged it for abuse
- it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0602) — most recent Jan 2026
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has 7 actual-harm citations
- a high number of inspection citations overall (52) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $147,579 in federal fines (most recent 2026-01-30)
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
- its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)
- nursing-staff turnover (86%) runs well above the national median (45%)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 2 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 2 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 2 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 2 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 3 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 3 to 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 27.1% | 15.6% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 17.3% | 7.2% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.5% | 0.7% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 3.0% | 2.3% | 2.0% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 3.1% | 5.9% | 6.5% | better |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 10.0% | 3.5% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 28.9% | 18.3% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 15.2% | 21.3% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 61.2% | 94.1% | 95.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 4.2% | 5.5% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 28.6% | 20.7% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 23.0% | 14.0% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 6.0% | 1.4% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 43.1% | 78.1% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 27.8% | 22.9% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 6.5% | 12.9% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.38 | 1.78 | 1.67 | better |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.04 | 1.80 | 1.80 | better |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
51.3% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 81 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 57.8% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 45 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.31 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 50% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 4% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 51.3%CMS range 39.7–60.6 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.1%CMS range 6.7–15.2 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 57.8% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 55.6% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 57.8% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 90.7% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 92.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 84.6% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 2.7% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 6.7% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 5.8%CMS range 2.9–10.1 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.98 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 100 beds and averages 86.6 residents a day — about 87% occupied, or roughly 13 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.13 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.63 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.60 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.85 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.24 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.65 to 0.57 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 86% is well above the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
52 citations, most serious first. The 17 most serious are shown; the remaining 35 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · G2025-06-13 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, and staff, resident, family, Physician, Medical Director, and Nurse Practitioner interviews, the facility failed to notify the Physician when a resident (Resident #69) reported she had fallen and was experiencing acute pain after the reported fall. Due to ineffective communication between staff a medical provider was not notified of the fall until the following day which delayed x-rays, medical interventions and an evaluation in the emergency department. Resident #69 sustained an acute proximal tibia and fibula fracture (breaks in the upper part of the shinbone (tibia) and the smaller bone of the lower leg (fibula) from the reported fall and required a two day hospitalization. Orthopedics recommended hinged knee brace with non-weight bearing status to the right lower extremity. This deficient practice occurred for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for notification of changes. Findings included: Resident # 69 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included cerebral infarction…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-06-13 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, and staff, resident, family, Physician, Medical Director, and Nurse Practitioner (NP) interviews, the facility failed to protect a resident's right to be free from neglect after Resident #69 had a fall during a staff assisted transfer on 6/27/25 (Saturday). The Nursing Supervisor went to assess Resident #69 after a nurse aide told her the resident reported she had fallen and was having pain in her right knee. Resident #69 told the Nursing Supervisor she was in pain and said her knee was hurting. The Nursing Supervisor did not report the fall or pain to a medical provider. Resident #69 spoke Spanish and there was no evidence that staff utilized an interpreter to determine what had occurred or her level of pain. Due to ineffective communication between staff a medical provider was not notified of fall or pain until 6/8/25 at which time orders were received for an x-ray and ibuprofen (a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug) for pain. The x-ray results received on 6/8/25 noted an acute proximal tibia and fibula fracture (breaks in the upper part of the shinbone…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-06-13 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, and staff, resident, family, and Nurse Practitioner interviews, the facility failed to recognize a resident experienced a fall during a staff transfer that resulted in acute pain to her right knee/ leg on 6/7/25. The nurse aides did not report Resident #69 falling to a nurse and Resident #69 was not assessed by a nurse or medical provider before she was moved and transferred back to her bed. In addition, nursing staff did not complete or document comprehensive assessments of the resident and did not recognize Resident #69 needed medical evaluation and treatment. Due to ineffective communication between staff a medical provider was not notified of fall until the following day and x-ray results reported on 6/8/25 were not communicated to a medical provider until 6/9/25, which delayed medical interventions and an evaluation in the emergency department. Resident #69 sustained an acute proximal tibia and fibula fracture (breaks in the upper part of the shinbone (tibia) and the smaller bone of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2025-06-13 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, and staff, resident, family, and Nurse Practitioner interviews, the facility failed to provide a safe transfer for a resident who reported she fell during a transfer with staff. Resident #69 stated she was assisted off the toilet by two staff members, had difficulty holding on to the assist rail because her right hand did not work, fell on her right knee and had pain her in right knee immediately. Resident #69 sustained an acute proximal tibia and fibula fracture (breaks in the upper part of the shinbone (tibia) and the smaller bone of the lower leg (fibula) from the reported fall and required a two day hospitalization. Orthopedics recommended hinged knee brace with non-weight bearing status to the right lower extremity. This deficient practice occurred for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for falls (Resident #69). Findings included: Resident # 69 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included cerebral infarction (stroke) and hemiplegia (paralysis) affecting the dominant right…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2025-06-13 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, and staff, resident, family, and Nurse Practitioner (NP) interviews, the facility failed to provide effective pain management for a resident who had acute pain after a reported fall on 6/27/25 (Saturday). Resident #69 spoke Spanish and reported through an interpreter two days after the fall that she fell on her right knee during an assisted transfer and had pain immediately which she rated at a pain scale of 9 (Pain scale of 0 is no pain and pain scale of 10 is the worst pain). Due to ineffective communication between staff a medical provider was not notified of fall or pain until 6/8/25 at which time ibuprofen (a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug) was ordered for pain. There was no evidence staff utilized an interpreter to determine an accurate level of pain or the effectiveness of pain medication. The first documented administration of pain medication was on 6/8/25 at 3:52 PM when Resident #69 received ibuprofen for a pain level of 10 which was ineffective. There was no evidence a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2025-06-13 · tag F0777 — isolatedProvide or obtain x-rays/tests when ordered and promptly tell the ordering practitioner of the results.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, and staff, resident, family, Physician, Medical Director, and Nurse Practitioner interviews, the facility failed to notify the Physician of radiology results for a resident who was experiencing acute pain after a reported fall on 6/7/25. Due to ineffective communication between staff x-ray results reported on 6/8/25 were not communicated to a medical provider until 6/9/25 which delayed medical interventions and an evaluation in the emergency department. Resident #69 sustained an acute proximal tibia and fibula fracture (breaks in the upper part of the shinbone (tibia) and the smaller bone of the lower leg (fibula) from the reported fall and required a two day hospitalization. Orthopedics recommended hinged knee brace with non-weight bearing status to the right lower extremity. This deficient practice occurred for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for notification of radiology results (Resident #69). Findings included: An interview was conducted on 6/12/25 at 2:13 PM with Resident #69. PTA #1…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-04-25 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, review of video footage, resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to protect a resident's right to be free from physical abuse when a moderately cognitively impaired resident (Resident #3) used a closed fist and punched a severely cognitively impaired resident (Resident #4) in the face. Resident #4 fell backwards, hit her head on the floor and was sent to the emergency room for further evaluation. A computed tomography (CT) scan of the head identified a small intraventricular hemorrhage (a small amount of bleeding inside the ventricles that produce fluid to protect and cushion the brain in the skull) and a scalp hematoma (a collection of blood between the skull the scalp). Neurosurgery was consulted and considered the intraventricular hemorrhage stable, and no further treatment was required, and Resident #4 returned to the facility. Additionally, the facility failed to protect a residents' right to be free from physical abuse when Resident #3 shoved a severely cognitive impaired…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-26 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to implement their abuse policy when the Administrator was not immediately notified of an allegation of staff to resident abuse resulting in delayed investigation, protection, and reporting to the State Agency, law enforcement, and Adult Protective Services for 1 of 3 residents review for abuse (Resident #1).A facility policy dated 9/1/24 titled Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation indicated the following:-all alleged violations were to be reported to the Administrator, State Agency, Adult Protective Services (APS), and to all other required agencies (e.g., law enforcement) when applicable with in specified time frames: Immediately, but not later than 2 hours after the allegation is made, if the events that cause the allegation involve abuse or result in serious bodily injury.-An immediate investigation is warranted when suspicion of abuse, neglect or exploitation, or reports of abuse, neglect or exploitation occur.-The facility will make efforts to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-26 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and staff and Medical Director interviews, the facility failed to assess a resident (Resident #1) after a fall when a Nurse Aide (NA #2) did not report a fall to the nurse on 11/24/25. X-ray's completed on 11/25/25 showed Resident #1 had a fracture (break in the bone) of her right olecranon (bony pointed tip of the elbow) and right femoral (thigh bone) neck requiring her to be transferred to the hospital on [DATE]. Resident #1's right arm and right hip were surgically repaired on 11/25/25 and she was readmitted to the facility on [DATE]. This deficient practice occurred for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for quality of care. The findings included:Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included dementia.A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] documented Resident #1 had severe cognitive impairment. The MDS documented Resident #1 had sustained two or more falls with no injury. An undated written statement by NA #2 read: On 11/24/25 I was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-30 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — patternProtect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, and staff and pharmacist interviews, the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from misappropriation of controlled narcotic medications for 6 of 6 residents reviewed for misappropriation of residents' property (Residents #6, #7, #8, #9, #10, and #11).Findings included: The facility's Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation policy revised on 9/01/24 read in part that it is the policy of this facility to provide protections for the health, welfare and rights of each resident by developing and implementing written policies and procedures that prohibit and prevent abuse, neglect, exploitation and misappropriation of resident property. a. Resident #6 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The physician's order dated 10/27/25 revealed Resident #6 had an order to receive Oxycodone (narcotic pain medication) 10 milligrams (mg) tablet three times daily for pain. Review of Resident #6's narcotic record revealed Nurse #1 had signed out one (1) Oxycodone 10 mg tablet on 11/14/25 at 7:30…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-30 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to have effective systems in place for accurate reconciliation of narcotics medications when Nurse #2 signed narcotic records as witness to wasting without visually observing narcotic medications being wasted for 2 of 6 residents reviewed for misappropriation of residents' property (Residents #6 and #9).Findings included: a. Resident #6 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The physician's order dated 10/27/25 revealed Resident #6 had an order to receive one oxycodone (narcotic pain medication) 10 milligram (mg) tablet three times daily for pain. Review of Resident #6's narcotic record revealed Nurse #1 (an agency nurse) had signed out one (1) oxycodone 10 mg tablet on 11/14/25 at 7:30 PM and 11:30 PM. Review of Resident #6's narcotic record revealed Nurse #2 (an agency nurse) signed as a witness to Nurse #1's disposal of one (1) oxycodone 10 mg tablet on 11/14/25 at an illegible time. b. Resident #9 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-06-13 · tag F0641 — patternEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 4. Resident #5 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His cumulative diagnoses included protein-calorie malnutrition and dysphagia (difficulty swallowing). A Speech Therapy (ST) evaluation and plan of treatment for the certification period 05/01/25 through 07/29/25 revealed at baseline, Resident #5 presented with mild oropharyngeal (middle part of the throat behind the mouth) dysphagia characterized by mildly impaired lingual (tongue)/labial (lips) range of motion/coordination, loss of bolus (soft mass of chewed food), and coughing/gagging. A nutrition evaluation dated 05/29/25 revealed Resident #5 had the following signs/symptoms of a swallowing disorder: loss of liquids/solids from mouth when eating or drinking, coughing or choking during meals or when swallowing medications, and complaints of difficulty or pain when swallowing. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #5 did not have signs and symptoms of a swallowing disorder. During an interview on 06/13/25 at 11:02…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-13 · tag F0553 — failed to let residents help plan their care — isolatedAllow resident to participate in the development and implementation of his or her person-centered plan of care.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, and resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to invite a resident to participate and provide input in the care planning process for 1 of 2 sampled residents (Resident #16). Findings included: Resident #16 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE]. The annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #16 had intact cognition. Review of Resident #16's electronic medical record revealed no evidence he was invited to attend care plan meetings to discuss and provide input regarding his plan of care following the completion of a quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], a quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE], a quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE], and an annual MDS assessment dated [DATE]. During an interview on 06/09/25 at 2:11 PM, Resident #16 stated he had been invited and attended care plan meetings in the past but could not recall the last time one was held. Resident #16 expressed that he wanted to participate in the care plan meetings so…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-13 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interviews with residents and staff, the facility failed to ensure a dependent resident's accessibility to the light switch located behind the bed for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for accommodation of needs (Resident #30). The findings included: Resident #30 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] coded Resident #30 with severely impaired cognition. The MDS indicated he required partial to moderate assistance for walking between locations inside the room for more than 10 feet. During an observation conducted on 06/09/25 at 12:47 PM, the switch for the light fixture behind Resident #30's bed was attached with a broken cord 2.5 inches in length. It was 5 feet from the floor and 6 feet from the bed. Resident #30 was unable to reach the switch cord from the bed if needed. An interview was conducted with Resident #30 on 06/09/25 at 12:49 PM. He could not recall when the switch cord was broken. He stated that he did not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-13 · tag F0627 — isolatedEnsure the transfer/discharge meets the resident's needs/preferences and that the resident is prepared for a safe transfer/discharge.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews with the Resident Representative and staff, the facility failed to ensure the basis for a resident's discharge from the facility met the discharge requirement criteria for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for discharge (Resident #189). On 01/28/25, Resident #189 was issued a 30-day notice for non-payment prior to a claim being submitted to the Managed Medicaid plan (private insurance company contracted to manage the provision of care and benefits) for payment of his stay. Findings included: Resident #189 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #189 had intact cognition and there was no active discharge plan in place. A Nursing Home Notice of Transfer/Discharge form dated 01/28/25 revealed Resident #128 would be discharged from the facility on 02/28/25. The reason for the transfer/discharge was marked, you have failed, after reasonable and appropriate notice, to pay for (or to have paid under Medicare or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-13 · tag F0628 — isolatedProvide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to complete a discharge summary that included a recapitulation of the resident's stay and final summary of the resident's status for 1 of 3 sampled residents reviewed for discharge (Resident #189). Findings included: Resident #189 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #189 had intact cognition and there was no active discharge plan in place. The discharge MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #189 discharged to the community. Review of Resident #189's electronic medical record on 06/11/25 revealed an assessment titled Discharge Summary (Recap [recapitulation] of Resident's Stay) dated 02/24/25 had a status of in progress. The discharge summary assessment consisted of 5 sections to complete: 1) Discharge Information such as location, date of discharge, referrals, and primary provider contact information, 2) Recap of Stay that included sub-sections for Nursing,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-13 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2. Resident #5 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included cerebral palsy (group of disorders that affect movement, balance and posture). The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #5 had intact cognition. He required partial/moderate to substantial/maximum staff assistance with self-care tasks and was dependent on staff for mobility and transfers. It was noted on the MDS assessment that Resident #5's activities of daily living functional/rehabilitation potential would be addressed in the care plan. The significant change MDS dated [DATE] revealed Resident #5 had intact cognition. He required supervision or touching assistance with eating and was dependent on staff for all other self-care tasks. He required substantial/maximum staff assistance with rolling left-to-right and from a sit-to-lying position and was dependent on staff with lying-to-sitting on the side of the bed and transfers. It was noted on the MDS assessment that Resident #5's activities of daily…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 35 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-13 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews with the staff, resident and the Nurse Practitioner (NP), the facility failed to request a refill from the pharmacy prior to the last dose being administered resulting in a resident missing 3 doses of the scheduled medication for 1 of 9 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications (Resident #16). Findings included: Resident #16 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis that included hypertensive heart disease without heart failure. The annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #16 had intact cognition. A physician order dated 04/20/24 revealed Resident #16 was to receive prazosin hydrochloride (medication used to lower blood pressure) 5 milligrams (mg) at bedtime for blood pressure related to hypertensive heart disease without heart failure. A physician order dated 04/21/24 revealed Resident #16 was to receive amlodipine (medication used to lower blood pressure) 5 mg once a day at 9:00 AM for arterial hypertension related to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-13 · tag F0700 — isolatedTry different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and staff interviews, the facility failed to assess the risks of entrapment and complete bed rail assessments and failed to obtain informed consent prior to the installation for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for bed rails (Resident #4 and Resident #76). Findings Included: 1. Resident #4 was admitted to the facility 01/21/25 with diagnoses including dementia and Parkinson's disease (a brain disorder that can cause uncontrollable movements). A review of Resident #4's electronic medical records revealed no bed rail assessments had been completed since admission to the facility on [DATE]. The significant change in status Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #4 was rarely or never understood, and her cognition was severely impaired. The MDS indicated Resident #4's range of motion was impaired on both sides of the upper and lower extremities, and she was dependent on staff assistance to roll left and right. The MDS revealed Resident #4's ability to move…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-13 · tag F0745 — failed to provide medically-related social services — isolatedProvide medically-related social services to help each resident achieve the highest possible quality of life.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, and staff, resident, family, and Nurse Practitioner interviews, the facility failed to provide ongoing, consistent, effective means of communication for a resident (Resident #69) to be able to communicate. Resident #69's primary language was Spanish, and she did not speak English. This deficient practice occurred for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for medically related social services. Findings included: Resident #69 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included cerebral infarction (stroke) and hemiplegia (paralysis) affecting the dominant right side. The quarterly Minimum Data Set Assessment (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #69 was cognitively intact. It was documented on the MDS Resident #69's preferred language was Spanish, and she needed an interpreter. A care plan dated 1/12/25 read: Resident #69 has a communication problem related to language barrier; resident speaks Spanish language. The care plan goal was for her to be able to make basic needs known. The care plan…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-13 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews with the staff and the Nurse Practitioner (NP), the facility failed to have effective systems in place for acquiring a scheduled opioid pain medication when nursing staff failed to request a prescription from the medical provider to avoid a gap in medication administration when refilling a controlled medication, and failed to utilize pharmaceutical resources in Pyxis (an automated dispensing machine that provided secure medication storage) which resulted in Resident #139 missing 3 days of a scheduled pain medication. This deficient practice occurred for 1 of 8 residents reviewed for pharmacy services (Resident #139). The findings included: Resident #139 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including osteoporosis. She expired in the facility on [DATE]. The physician's order dated [DATE] revealed Resident #139 had an order to receive 1 tablet of tramadol (an opioid pain medication used to treat moderate to severe pain) 50 milligrams (mg) by mouth once daily in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-13 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews with the staff and the Nurse Practitioner (NP), the facility failed to prevent a significant medication error when nursing staff failed to administer tramadol (opioid pain medication) to Resident #139 for three consecutive days. This deficient practice occurred for 1 of 9 residents reviewed for significant medication errors (Resident #139). The findings included: Resident #139 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including osteoporosis. She expired in the facility on [DATE]. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] coded Resident #139 with severely impaired cognition. She had adequate vision and hearing with clear speech. The MDS indicated Resident #139 received both scheduled and as needed pain medications including opioid during the 7-day review period. The care plan for pain initiated on [DATE] revealed Resident #139 was at risk of pain. The goals were to remain free of interruptions in normal activities due to pain through the review date.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-13 · tag F0808 — failed to follow doctor-ordered diets — isolatedEnsure therapeutic diets are prescribed by the attending physician and may be delegated to a registered or licensed dietitian, to the extent allowed by State law.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observations, interviews with the Speech Therapist and staff, the facility failed to provide fluids of a nectar thick consistency as ordered by the physician for 1 of 8 residents reviewed for nutrition (Resident #20). Findings included: Resident #20 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and his current diagnoses included dementia and dysphagia (difficulty swallowing). The care plan last revised on 04/21/25 identified Resident #20 nutritional status was at risk related to advanced age, dementia, and dysphagia. Interventions included assist with meal setup, eating, and drinking as needed. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #20's cognition was severely impaired. The MDS assessment indicated Resident #20 had upper extremity impairment on one side, needed partial to moderate assistance with eating, received a mechanically altered diet, and had no signs or symptoms of a swallowing disorder. A review of the active diet order dated 04/24/25 revealed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-13 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, and staff, resident, family, and Nurse Practitioner interviews, the facility failed to document a reported fall with acute pain in a resident's medical record. This deficient practice occurred for 1 of 1 resident record reviewed for accuracy of documentation (Resident #69). Findings included: An interview was conducted with Resident #69 on 6/12/25 at 2:13 PM with Physical Therapy Assistant (PTA) #1 providing translation. Resident #69 stated she had gone to the bathroom with two staff members and fell onto her right knee when she was being assisted off the toilet Saturday. Resident #69 reported she had pain in her right knee immediately but did not cry or scream out. Review of Resident #69's medical record revealed there was no documentation or assessment information from Saturday 6/7/25 about the reported fall. The last documented progress note in Resident #69's medical record was documented on 6/6/25. There was no additional documentation for Resident #69 until 6/8/25 at 1:30 PM. A telephone interview was conducted with the day shift (7:00 am to 7:00 pm)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-13 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, and resident and staff interviews the facility failed to provide an influenza vaccine to 1 of 5 residents reviewed for immunizations (Resident #23). The findings included: Resident #23 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The quarterly Minimum Data Set Assessment (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #23 was cognitively intact. The MDS indicated Resident #23 had not received the influenza vaccine and indicated the reason as not offered. Review of Resident #23's medical record revealed she had not received an influenza vaccine since October 2023. An influenza vaccine informed consent form signed by Resident #23 was present in the medical record and indicated Resident #23 wanted to receive the influenza vaccine. The consent form was not dated. An interview was conducted on 6/13/25 at 11:50 AM with Resident #23. She stated the facility had offered her the flu vaccine and she remembered completing the consent form but that she had never received the flu vaccine. Resident #23 said someone…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-25 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, and interviews with the Responsible Party (RP), and staff, the facility failed to implement their abuse policy and procedures for reporting and protecting residents after a resident (Resident #2) reported a male Nurse Aide (NA) attacked and cursed at her. After the allegation of abuse was reported the male NA assigned to the unit remained at the facility for the rest of his shift with access to other residents. Additionally, the facility failed to report Resident #2 alleged sexual abuse to Adult Protective Services. The deficient practice occurred for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for abuse (Resident #2). Findings included: A review of the facility's Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation Policy dated 9/1/24 revealed it was the facility's policy to provide protection for the health, welfare and rights of each resident by developing and implementing written policies and procedures that prohibit and prevent abuse. For Reporting/Response the facility's policy was to report all alleged violations to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-27 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — patternProtect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews with resident, staff, and the Nurse Practitioner (NP), the facility failed to protect residents' rights to be free from misappropriation of controlled medications for 3 of 3 residents (Resident #29, Resident # 58, and Resident #113) reviewed for misappropriation of residents' property. The findings included: The facility's Abuse, Neglect, or Misappropriation of Resident property policy, last revised on [DATE], revealed in part the facility would ensure all residents to remain free from abuse or misappropriation of their property. a. Resident #29 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including acute respiratory distress. A review of the physician's order dated [DATE] revealed Resident #29 had an order to receive 0.25 milliliters (ml) of morphine sulfate oral solution with the strength of 20 milligrams (mg) per ml by mouth once every 4 hours as needed for pain related to acute respiratory distress. A review of the controlled substance count sheet for Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-27 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — patternProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interviews with the Registered Dietitian (RD) and staff, the facility failed to implement the recommendation for a protein supplement and failed to administer the correct amount of a nutritional supplement as ordered by the physician for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for nutrition (Resident #25 and #51). Findings included: 1. Resident #25 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including diabetes mellitus and severe protein calorie malnutrition. A nutrition/dietary note dated 10/27/23 revealed a recommendation was made to administer 30 milliliters (ml) of liquid protein twice a day related to severe calorie-protein malnutrition. Review of the current physician orders included an order for the administration of a liquid protein with directions to give 30 ml twice a day due to severe calorie-protein malnutrition with a start date 10/30/23. Review of the Medication Administration Record (MAR) from [DATE] through June 2024 revealed the physician's order dated 10/30/23 for liquid…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-06-27 · tag F0712 — patternEnsure that the resident and his/her doctor meet face-to-face at all required visits.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY f. Resident #25 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including diabetes mellitus and severe protein-calorie malnutrition. Review of the medical records for Resident #25 revealed physician progress notes dated 01/11/24, 02/15/24, and 03/31/24 to indicate she was seen by the facility's Medical Doctor (MD). There was no other evidence in the medical records of Resident #25 of physician visits conducted by the MD. Review of the medical records for Resident #25 revealed she was seen by the NP on 10/5/23, 11/11/23, 12/13/23, 3/19/24, 4/4/24, and 5/24/24. The Director of Nursing was no longer employed and unable to be interviewed. The facility's MD was out of the country and unable to be interviewed. During an interview on 06/26/24 at 1:39 PM, the Regional Clinical Nurse Consultant revealed the MD kept track of his own schedule for when regulatory visits were due. She revealed when the MDS Coordinators noticed physician visits were not being completed, the Medical Records staff member conducted an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-06-27 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — patternHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure Registered Nurse (RN) coverage was provided for at least 8 consecutive hours per day for 6 of 85 days reviewed (Dates 04/27/24, 04/28/24, 05/20/24, 05/21/24, 05/26/24, and 06/08/24). Findings included: Review of the daily nurse staffing sheets and associated time clock reports for the period 04/01/24 through 06/24/24 revealed the facility did not have the required RN coverage on the following dates: 04/27/24, 04/28/24, 05/20/24, 05/21/24, 05/26/24, and 06/08/24. During an interview on 06/27/24 at 3:53 PM, the Scheduling Coordinator revealed she took over handling the Skilled Nursing staff schedules on 03/18/24 and was usually able to ensure there was an RN scheduled daily anywhere from 8 to 12 hours. The Scheduling Coordinator stated the only time there wouldn't be the required RN coverage was when the RN scheduled called out of work. During an interview on 06/26/24 at 9:34 AM and a joint interview with the Administrator on 06/27/24 at 6:12 PM, the Regional Clinical Nurse Consultant acknowledged that the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-06-27 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to secure an opened bottle of Silvadene cream for 1 of 1 Resident (Resident # 30) review for medication storage, failed to removed expired over-the-counter (OTC) medications in accordance with the manufacturer's expiration date for 1 of 2 medication storage rooms and 1 of 4 medication carts (Upper medication storage room and Upper C halls medication cart), failed to remove expired insulin as specified by the manufacturer's guidelines for 1 of 4 medication carts (Upper C halls), and failed to store insulins and eye drops in the temperature specified by the manufacturer's guidelines in 3 of 4 medication carts during medication storage checks (Upper C halls, Lower C halls, and Lower D halls). The findings included: a. During a joint observation conducted with Nurse #2 on 06/23/24 at 9:51 AM, an opened bottle of Silvadene cream 1% containing approximately 10 grams was left unattended on the top of the bedside table in Resident #30's room. An interview was conducted with Resident #30 on 06/23/24 at 9:58 AM.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-27 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, record review, and interviews with staff the facility failed to follow their infection control policy and procedures to implement Enhanced Barrier Precaution (EBP) precautions for residents with indwelling medical devices during high-contact care activities of a central line, feeding tube, tracheostomy, and urinary catheter (Resident #25, #51, #18, and #2) and failed to follow their hand hygiene policy and procedure after removing gloves, after handling items potentially contaminated with body fluids, and when moving from a contaminated body site to a clean body site during incontinence care (Resident#36). These failures occurred for 5 of 5 residents reviewed for infection control. Findings included: Review of the facility's enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) policy and procedures with no revision date read in part, It was the facility's policy to implement barrier precautions for the prevention of transmission of multidrug-resistant organisms (MDRO). EBP referred to an infection control intervention designed to reduce the transmission of MDRO that employed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-27 · tag F0553 — failed to let residents help plan their care — isolatedAllow resident to participate in the development and implementation of his or her person-centered plan of care.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, family and staff interviews, the facility failed to invite residents and/or their Resident Representative (RR) to participate and provide input in care planning for 1 of 2 sampled residents (Resident #30). This practice had the potential to affect other residents. Findings included: Resident #30 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses that included hemiplegia (paralysis on one side of the body) and hemiparesis (partial weakness on one side of the body) following cerebral infarction (stroke) affecting the left non-dominant side and dementia. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #30 had severe cognitive impairment. Review of Resident #30's electronic medical record revealed an admission MDS assessment was completed on 12/05/23 and quarterly MDS assessments were completed on 03/04/24 and 06/04/24. Further review revealed no evidence that she or her RR were invited to attend a care plan meeting to discuss and provide input regarding…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-27 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolatedKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and staff interviews, the facility failed to protect the private health information for 2 of 2 sampled residents (Resident #1 and Resident #53) by leaving confidential medical information unattended and exposed in an area accessible to the public. The findings included: Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. a. A continuous observation was made on 06/25/24 from 9:31 AM through 9:36 AM of an unattended medication cart in the hallway of Lower C halls between room C09 and C11. Nurse #1 left the medication cart with the Medication Administration Record (MAR) of Resident #1 visible on the medication cart's computer screen when she was away administering medication. The screen showed the name and the picture of Resident #1. The surveyor could easily access information related to her current medications and other private health information. The unattended computer was accessible by anyone passing by the medication cart. During an interview with Nurse #1 on 06/25/24 at 9:39 AM, she…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-27 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to identify and implement effective interventions to prevent resident-to-resident physical abuse when a severely cognitively impaired resident (Resident #23) with a known history of aggression hit another severely cognitively impaired resident (Resident #11) in the face for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for abuse. As a result of the incident, Resident #11 sustained a small cut measuring 0.2 centimeters (cm) by 0.1 cm to the left eyebrow and bruising to the left top of hand measuring 3.5 cm by 3 cm. Findings included: Resident #11 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included hemiplegia (complete paralysis on one side of the body) and hemiparesis (partial weakness on one side of the body) following cerebral infarction (stroke) affecting the left non-dominant side, diabetes, vascular dementia, psychotic disturbance, and anxiety. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] assessed Resident #11 with severe cognitive…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-27 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews the facility failed to implement their abuse policy and procedures in the areas of reporting and investigation by not submitting an Initial Allegation Report within 2 hours to the State Regulatory Agency and not initiating an investigation when an allegation of abuse was reported to the Administrator. This deficient practice affected 1 of 5 residents reviewed for abuse (Resident #31). Findings included: The facility's undated policy titled, Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation, read in part, It is the policy of this facility to provide protections for the health, welfare and rights of each resident by developing and implementing written policies and procedures that prohibit and prevent abuse, neglect, exploitation and misappropriation of resident property. An immediate investigation is warranted when suspicion of abuse, neglect or exploitation, or reports of abuse, neglect or exploitation occur. Written procedures for investigations include: identifying staff responsible…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-27 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to develop individualized, comprehensive care plans that included areas of focus for nutritional risk and indwelling catheter for 2 of 5 residents reviewed for nutrition and urinary catheters (Resident #2 and Resident #22). Findings included: 1. Resident #2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included urinary retention and dementia. A physician's diet order for Resident #2 dated 03/29/24 read in part, regular diet with pureed texture and regular/thin liquids. A physician's order for Resident #2 dated 03/29/24 read in part, suprapubic catheter (flexible tube that enters the body through a small incision in the abdomen that helps drain urine from the bladder) one time a day. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #2 had intact cognition. He was dependent on staff assistance for all self-care tasks, including eating. He had an indwelling catheter and received a mechanically altered diet.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-27 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and interviews with the Nurse Practitioner (NP) and staff the facility failed to obtain a physician's order for the administration of heparin (an anticoagulant medication) used by Nurse #1 to flush the peripherally inserted central catheter for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications (Resident #25). Findings included: Resident #25 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including diabetes mellitus and pulmonary embolism. The care plan last reviewed 3/22/24 included Resident #25 was at risk for complications related to anticoagulant therapy for the use of apixaban with the goal to have no adverse reactions to the medication. Interventions included administer as ordered by the physician and monitor for side effects signs of bleeding and bruising. Review of Resident #25's current physician orders included the administration of apixaban (an anticoagulant medication) give 5 milligrams (mg) twice a day for atrial fibrillation started on 10/05/23 and 4.5…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-27 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews with resident, staff, and the Nurse Practitioner (NP), the facility failed to pull controlled medications from the medication cart and returned them to the pharmacy after the resident was deceased . As a result, controlled medications of a deceased resident remained in the medication cart were targeted and diverted for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for pharmacy services (Resident #113). The findings included: Resident #113 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including thrombocytopenia. He passed away in the facility on [DATE]. A review of the physician's order dated [DATE] revealed Resident #113 had an order to receive 5 mg of oxycodone by mouth once every 12 hours for moderate to severe pain. This order was discontinued on [DATE]. A review of the MARs for [DATE] revealed Resident #113 had received oxycodone 5 mg once on [DATE]. The admission MDS dated [DATE] coded Resident #113 with an intact cognition. A review of the controlled substance count sheet for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-27 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview the facility failed to include documentation in the medical record of refusal or acceptance of the influenza and pneumonia vaccinations for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #20) reviewed for immunizations. The findings included: Resident #20 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the quarterly minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealing she was cognitively intact. The MDS indicated Resident #20 did not receive the flu vaccination because Resident #20 received it from an outside location with no date noted. It was further documented that the pneumonia vaccination was not offered to Resident #20 and her pneumonia vaccination was not up to date. Record review of Resident #20's immunizations and consents revealed no available documentation regarding receiving, offering, refusing, or education for the flu or pneumonia vaccinations. An interview on 6/26/24 at 1:30 PM with Resident #20 revealed that she usually refused the flu shot every year but thought that she had agreed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-21 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — patternProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interviews with the Registered Dietitian, Nurse Practitioner, Medical Doctor, and staff, the facility failed to obtain weekly weights as ordered by the physician and failed to implement the recommendation for a nutritional supplement to promote weight stability and failed to implement interventions when weight loss was identified for a resident with significant weight loss for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for nutrition (Resident #1). Findings included: Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including dementia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and cerebral vascular accident (blocked or reduced blood flow to the brain) with hemiplegia (severe or complete loss of strength or movement) affecting the left nondominated side. Review of the current physician's orders for medication and nutritional supplements included mirtazapine 7.5 milligrams give 1 tablet at bedtime related to symptoms and signs concerning food and fluid intake; 2.0 fortified nutrition shake give…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-23 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews the facility failed to complete and submit an Initial Allegation Report within 2 hours to the State Regulatory Agency for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for abuse (Resident #2 and Resident #3). Findings included: Resident #2 was admitted to the facility 01/17/24. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #2 was severely cognitively impaired. Resident #3 was admitted to the facility 08/23/22. The quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #3 was moderately cognitively impaired. The Administrator completed an Initial Allegation Report to the State Regulatory Agency on 03/10/24. The report designated the type of allegation as Resident Abuse and stated the facility became aware of the allegation on 03/09/24 at 5:15 PM. Allegation details revealed Resident #2 was found in Resident #3's room and had grabbed Resident #3's arm. The residents were separated, and Resident #2 was assisted to her room. Resident #2 received increased…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-23 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews the facility failed to complete a thorough investigation of an allegation of resident-to-resident abuse for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for abuse (Resident #2 and Resident #3). Findings included: The facility's undated Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation policy read in part as follows: An immediate investigation is warranted when suspicion of abuse, neglect or exploitation, or reports of abuse, neglect or exploitation occur. Written procedures for investigations include: identifying staff responsible for the investigation; identifying and interviewing all persons, including the alleged victim, alleged perpetrator, witnesses, and others who might have knowledge of the allegations; focusing the investigation on determining if abuse, neglect, exploitation, and/or mistreatment has occurred, the extent, and cause; providing complete and thorough documentation of the investigation. Resident #2 was admitted to the facility 01/17/24. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-09-15 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — widespreadDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interviews, record reviews, and review of the facility's abuse policies and procedures the facility failed to develop an abuse policy that included procedures related to screening, training, prevention, identification, investigation, protection, and coordination with QAPI to address allegations of abuse. The findings included: The facility's Abuse Policy titled Elder/Dependent Adult Abuse Assessment and Reporting, dated July 2011 revealed all alleged violations involving mistreatment, neglect, abuse, including injuries of unknown origin, will be reported immediately to the Department Supervisor who will forward the complaint to the Administrator. It is the policy of the facility to report any suspected cases of elder abuse or dependent adult abuse. Employees subject to the reporting requirements include any employees who provides direct resident care and any other employee whose duties require him/her to regularly work directly with elders or dependent adults. The policy failed to include written procedures for screening potential employees, training of new and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-09-15 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and staff interviews the facility failed to date opened food, remove expired food available for use, and indicate the expiration date of thawed milkshakes for 1 of 1 walk-in cooler; failed to date and cover food item in 1 of 1 walk-in freezer; failed to label and date food and beverage items, indicate the expiration date of thawed milkshakes, and remove expired food available for use in 2 of 2 nourishment rooms (upper and lower floor nourishment rooms). This practice had the potential to affect food served to residents. Findings included: 1. An initial tour of the walk-in cooler on 09/11/23 at 9:42 AM revealed the following: a. 5 thawed chocolate milkshakes sitting on a cart and 8 thawed milkshakes and 2 boxes of thawed milkshakes each containing 50 milkshakes sitting on a shelf. The manufacturer instructions stamped on each carton of milkshake indicated the product was good for 14 days after thawed. None of the milkshakes had a date indicating when they were placed in the cooler to thaw or when they expired. b. an opened 5-pound container of pimento cheese…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-09-15 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — patternSet up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, record review, and staff interviews, the facility's Quality Assessment and Assurance (QAA) Committee failed to maintain implemented procedures and monitor the interventions that the committee put into place following the recertification and complaint investigation survey completed on 03/25/22. This was for three repeat deficiencies originally cited in the areas of accuracy of assessments, food procurement - store/prepare/serve, and infection control that were subsequently recited on the current recertification and complaint investigation survey of 09/15/23. The continued failure of the facility during two federal surveys of record shows a pattern of the facility's inability to sustain an effective Quality Assessment and Assurance Program. The findings included: This tag is cross referenced to: F641: Based on record review and staff interviews the facility failed to accurately code a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment in the area of antipsychotic medication use for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications (Resident #36). During the recertification…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-15 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident was treated with dignity and respect when Nurse Aide (NA) #2 was observed speaking to a resident in a disrespectful manner for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for dignity (Resident #60). The findings included: Resident #60 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], transitioned to Hospice care on [DATE] and expired on [DATE]. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #60 had intact cognition and required extensive assistance with activities of daily living. During an interview on [DATE] at 1:46 PM, Nurse Aide (NA) #1 stated she assisted NA #2 provide incontinence care for Resident #60 on [DATE] around shift change. Resident #60 was total care and required 2 person-assist. Resident #60 had taken his clothes off, threw his diaper on the floor and had soiled himself. While providing care, NA #2 was yelling at Resident #60 and told him, he was stupid, he shouldn't be acting this way, he knew better and there was no…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-15 · tag F0582 — isolatedGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide completed Skilled Nursing Facility Advanced Beneficiary Notices (SNF ABN) prior to discharge from Medicare Part A skilled services to 2 of 3 residents reviewed for beneficiary notification review (Residents #9 and #21). The Findings Included: 1. Resident #9 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the medical record revealed a Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC) was discussed with Resident #9's Responsible Party (RP) on 08/23/23 which indicated Resident #9's Medicare Part A coverage for skilled services would end on 08/25/23. Resident #9 remained in the facility. Review of Resident #9's medical record revealed no evidence a SNF-ABN was also provided to Resident #9's RP. During an interview on 09/12/23 at 5:14 PM, the Social Worker explained he used to issue a SNF-ABN in conjunction with a NOMNC when a resident's Medicare Part A services ended but was instructed by the previous corporate representative that he only needed to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-15 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure 2 of 2 facility contractors followed the Special Droplet Contact Precautions signage posted on the doors of residents' rooms by not donning and doffing Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) while entering and exiting 2 of 6 resident rooms on transmission-based precautions (TBP) for COVID-19. The findings included: The Special Droplet Contact Precautions (SDCP) signage, with a revised date of 02/09/22, noted staff should follow the instructions listed on the signage before entering the resident's room which included: all healthcare personnel must: 1) clean hands before entering and when leaving the room, 2) wear a gown when entering room and remove before leaving, 3) wear N95 or higher level respirator before entering the room and remove after exiting, 4) wear protective eyewear (face shield or goggles), and 5) wear gloves when entering room and remove before leaving. A continuous observation on 09/12/23 from 9:50 AM to 10:00 AM of the lower C hall revealed Contractor #1 and Contractor #2 entered room C13 wearing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2025-06-13 · tag F0577 — widespreadAllow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, and staff and resident interviews the facility failed to post survey results in a location accessible to all residents and failed to post signage as to the location of the survey results in areas accessible to the public. This deficient practice occurred for 4 out of 5 days of the survey. The findings included: Observations made on 6/09/25 at 2:18 PM, 6/11/25 at 4:22 PM and 6/13/25 at 9:16 AM revealed the survey results were located in a binder on a side table in Waiting room [ROOM NUMBER]A, a room located in the lobby area of the facility. An observation of the first floor and ground floor resident hallways on 6/12/25 at 3:08 PM with the Social Worker, and an observation of the lobby area on 6/13/25 at 9:17 AM, revealed no signage indicating the location of the survey results binder. All resident rooms were located behind a locked door beyond the lobby area that required a code to open from either side. A Resident Council Meeting held on 6/11/25 at 2:57 PM revealed 5 of 5 residents who…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2024-06-27 · tag F0732 — widespreadPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure daily nurse staffing sheets were filled out completely for 27 of 123 days reviewed during the period 10/01/23 through 01/31/24. Findings included: Review of the facility's daily nurse staffing sheet revealed underneath the facility's name was a space to specify the date and current resident census. In addition, there were columns to complete that specified the number of staff and hours worked for Registered Nurses (RNs), Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) and Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs) for each 12-hour shift, 7:00 AM to 7:00 PM and 7:00 PM to 7:00 AM. Review of the daily nurse staffing sheets for 10/03/23, 10/21/23, 10/22/23, 10/26/23, and 10/31/23 revealed written at the bottom of each nurse staffing sheet was the total daily number of hours worked for RNs, LPNs, and CNAs. The columns for each shift indicating the number of staff and hours worked for RNs, LPNs, and CNAs were left blank. Review of the daily nurse staffing sheets for 11/02/23, 11/08/23, 11/12/23, 11/14/23, 11/18/23, 11/19/23, 11/24/23,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · B2024-06-27 · tag F0655 — patternCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to complete a baseline care plan that addressed the resident's immediate needs within 48 hours of admission and failed to provide the resident or their Responsible Party (RP) with a written summary of the baseline care plan for 2 of 7 residents reviewed for dialysis and nutrition (Resident #22 and Resident #25). The findings included: 1. Resident #22 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including diabetes, end-stage renal disease and dependence on renal dialysis. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #22 had intact cognition. He required partial/moderate to substantial/maximal assistance with self-care tasks and mobility. Further review revealed Resident #22 received dialysis services and a therapeutic diet. Review of Resident #22's medical record revealed a baseline care plan was initiated on 04/16/24 and signed as complete by the former Director of Nursing (DON) on 05/03/24. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$147,579 in federal fines across 6 penalties. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.
- $4,254 — penalty dated 2026-01-30
- $4,254 — penalty dated 2026-01-30
- $104,670 — penalty dated 2025-04-25
- $5,346 — penalty dated 2024-04-23
- $22,620 — penalty dated 2024-04-23
- $6,435 — penalty dated 2023-09-15
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2025-05-23 for 48 days
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to BRIGHTON HEALTHCARE — 8 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1 of 5 | 1.5 | -0.5 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 1 of 5 | 1.8 | -0.8 vs chain |
| Staffing | 2 of 5 | 1.9 | +0.1 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 2 of 5 | 1.6 | +0.4 vs chain |
The other 7 homes this chain runs (chain average 1.5★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ASHEVILLE HEALTH AND REHABILITATION SNF HOLDING LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 09/08/2023 |
| ASHEVILLE NC PROPERTY HOLDINGS, LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 09/08/2023 |
| FISCHER, DAVID | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 09/08/2023 |
| LEFKOWITZ, ZEV | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 09/08/2023 |
| NORMAN, ANGELITA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 09/09/2024 |
| BRAND SONNENSCHINE LLP | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 09/08/2023 |
| BRIGHTON MANAGEMENT TWO LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 09/08/2023 |
| FORVIS MAZARS LLP | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 09/08/2023 |
| TURBETT, TIMOTHY | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 09/08/2023 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 14 rows in the source record cover these 9 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
5 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $462K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in NC
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the North Carolina Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 345432. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-06-13, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.