Maluhia

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.18 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 19% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 0% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 158 beds and averages 82.4 residents a day — about 52% occupied, or roughly 76 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.14 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.68 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.453 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.05 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.58 on weekdays — 33% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 1.94 to 1.04 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 30% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

20 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 9 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2025-04-25 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews the facility was aware of Resident (R) 7's nut allergy but failed to document severity of nut allergy, failed to develop and implement a care plan for R7's nut allergy and failed to assure all recipes cooked in the kitchen were on the templates reviewed for food allergies before providing food to residents. The deficient practice resulted in harm to R7 who received food that contained nuts and having an anaphylactic response requiring transport to the emergency room for treatment. Findings Include: According to the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) A food allergy is a potentially serious response to consuming certain foods or food additives. For those who are sensitive, a reaction can occur within minutes or hours, and symptoms can range from mild to life-threatening. The nine leading causes of food allergies identified in the US are milk, eggs, fish, shellfish, tree nuts, peanuts, wheat, soybeans, and sesame. USDA's Food Safety and Inspection Service (FSIS) and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-10 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the care plan was revised for two Resident's (R) 27 and 72, of five sampled. 1) R27's care plan did not include interventions to prevent and treat scratches related to non-pressure skin conditions. 2) R72's care plan did not include additional interventions to prevent pulling out the Gastrostomy Tube (GT). As a result of the deficiency, R27 was at increased risk for worsening skin condition and R72 was at increased risk of the GT being pulled out. Findings Include: 1) On 07/07/25 at 08:22 AM, an observation of R27 and interview with Resident Representative (RR) 4 was done. Observed R27 in in her room in bed, her left hand had a blue latex glove on. RR4 spoke in English and in Korean, this surveyor was able to understand both languages, and reported she was wearing the gloves because she had scratches to her buttocks. Her nails get sharp and need to be cut daily. He no longer cuts her nails because of his poor vision but the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-25 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview the facility failed to report the results of an allegation of staff to resident abuse, involving Resident (R) 5 and a Certified Nurse Aide (CNA), within five working days of the incident to the State Agency (SA). Findings Include: Review of facility's Initial Event Report submitted to the SA on 02/19/25 for R5 included the following information: Head nurse received call from R5's daughter, very upset and yelling that her dad was not treated properly by the CNA who was assigned to him about 7am this morning. I want to know now the CNA who was assigned to my dad, I want to report and call the social worker. My dad is crying and calling me that he wanted me to pick him up and go home. Head nurse went to talk to R5 and he was able to voiced out his concern. R5 was still very emotional and crying while telling head nurse what happened. I rather go home if you don't like me here. It happened about 7am, I asked the CNA what's her name, she did not tell me, she came to answer my call light but she seems mad and angry. She helped me with my shishi bottle.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-25 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of three residents (Resident (R) 7) sampled for food allergies, was not served a food allergy. R7 was served mayonnaise on her lunch tray, a documented anaphylactic allergy, after R7's recent anaphylactic incident regarding a nut allergy that happened in the facility. This puts R7 at risk of allergy symptoms or anaphylaxis. Findings Include: On 04/25/25, an abbreviated survey was conducted for a facility reported incident (FRI), ACTs #11581. The facility was found not in compliance with requirements of 42 CFR 483, Subpart B, F684, Quality of Care. The facility was aware of R7's nut allergy but failed to document severity of nut allergy, failed to develop and implement a care plan for R7's nut allergy and failed to assure all recipes cooked in the kitchen were on the templates reviewed for food allergies before providing food to residents. The deficient practice resulted in harm to R7 who received food that contained nuts and having an anaphylactic response requiring transport to the emergency room for treatment…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-07-03 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolated
  Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident was free from physical restraints imposed for the purpose of convenience that was not required to treat the resident's medical condition for one of one resident sampled (Resident (R) 68). R68's reclined Geri-chair was not assessed as a restraint, although R68 forgets his physical limitations in standing and walking, R68 was observed to move his Geri-chair or attempt to get up and staff expressed they were unable to provide the constant supervision to prevent falls. Findings include: R68 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses, not limited to, Alzheimer's disease, dementia, weakness, and hemiplegia affecting right dominate side. On 06/30/24 at 09:34 AM to 10:12 AM, observed R68 in the hallway in a reclined Geri-chair. His upper body and head were tensed up not touching the reclined back of the chair, his left hand was holding the hallway rail, legs were reclined up and positioned toward the left side of the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-07-03 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility staff failed to correctly document Resident (R) 6's facility acquired injury, progressing from Moisture-Associated Skin Damage (MASD) on his right gluteus to a stage 3 Pressure Ulcer (PU) on his coccyx, in R6's Discharge Assessment that was submitted to Center of Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) on 05/27/24. The deficient practice does not accurately reflect R6's injured skin status. The deficient practice could affect all residents who have an injury that has worsened over time. Findings Include: Cross-reference to F842 Resident Records - Identifiable Information. Based on record review and interview the facility failed to update R6's electronic health record (EHR) to accurately stage his facility acquired injury progressing from Moisture-Associated Skin Damage (MASD) to his right gluteus to a stage 3 PU on his coccyx. On 07/01/24 at 01:45 PM interviewed Minimum Data Set (MDS) coordinator 1 and inquired who stages the resident's skin injuries and she stated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-03 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive person-centered care plan for one of 19 residents sampled (Resident (R) 68). R68's care plan did not include reclined Geri-chair in visible area for close supervision as an intervention to prevent R68 from falls when restless and expressing he wants to go home. Findings include: Cross Reference to F604. The facility failed to ensure a resident was free from physical restraints imposed for the purpose of convenience that was not required to treat the resident's medical condition for one of one resident sampled (Resident (R) 68). R68's reclined Geri-chair was not assessed as a restraint, although R68 forgets his physical limitations in standing and walking, R68 was observed to move his Geri-chair or attempt to get up and staff expressed they were unable to provide the constant supervision to prevent falls. On 07/02/24 at 01:56 PM, an interview with R68's resident representative (RR) 52 was done. RR52 reported R68 suffered a stroke and lost control of his right side of his body. R68…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-03 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to invite one of the sampled residents (Resident (R) 76) to attend and participate in her care planning meeting. This deficient practice has the potential to affect all the residents in the facility. Findings Include: R76 is a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE]. A review of R76's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) with Assessment Reference Date (ARD) 04/17/24 was conducted. R76's BIMS score was a 14, meaning R76 was cognitively intact. Interview with R76 was conducted in her room on 07/01/24 at 09:28 AM. R76 stated that she had not participated in her care planning meeting, and she would have loved to go. R76 stated, I've never heard of them having a meeting about me. If someone told me, I would have remembered and I would go. A review of R76's Electronic Health Record (EHR) was conducted. The record noted a care plan meeting held on 04/24/24. R76's son was listed as an attendee. R76 was not on the list for attendees.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-07-03 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. Findings include: On 06/30/24 at 08:42 AM, during an initial tour of the kitchen with [NAME] (C) 1, observed an opened and used large container of French salad dressing in the refrigerator. The salad dressing did not have an open/preparation date and a use-by-date. C1 was observed to immediately take the salad dressing out of the refrigerator and confirmed there should be a label for when the dressing was opened and when it should be discarded. Observed in a plastic container bin with a bag of oatmeal, a scooper on the bottom of the bin with oatmeal residue and unidentified debris. C1 confirmed the scooper should be hung and not touching the bottom of the bin. At 09:19 AM, observed C2 answer the phone, hang up the phone, put gloves on, and then his mask, before going back to prepping food, without washing his hands. Inquired with C2 if he washed his hands before putting on his gloves, C2 stated he did not. On 07/02/24 at 03:00 PM,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-07-03 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to update Resident (R) 6's electronic health record (EHR) to accurately stage his facility acquired injury progressing from Moisture-Associated Skin Damage (MASD) on his right gluteus to a stage 3 Pressure Ulcer (PU) on his coccyx. This deficient practice could affect all residents who have skin injuries that are not being documented correctly. Findings Include: On 07/01/24 at 10:09 AM during record review of R6's EHR found he had a newly in-house (facility) acquired MASD injury documented on his skin assessment dated [DATE]. Weekly skin assessments for R6 were filled out from 03/19/24 - 06/19/24 documenting R6 had MASD on his Right Gluteus that at times was deteriorating, stalled or improving. Weekly progress notes for Skin/Wound Notes, written by facility Registered Nurses (RNs), dated from 03/16/24 - 06/26/24 also had documentation that R6 had MASD and not a stage 3 PU to his coccyx. Review of pictures provided in R6's EHR showed R6's injury was deeper…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-03 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure proper hand hygiene procedures were followed by a staff member during medication administration. This deficient practice promotes the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections. The deficient practice has the potential to affect all the residents in the facility. Findings Include: Concurrent observation and interview were conducted on 07/02/24 at 08:16 AM. Registered Nurse (RN) 10 was observed preparing medications for Resident (R) 8. After placing the pills in the cup, RN10 walked to the refrigerator for apple juice. RN10 could not find apple juice so he/she used the telephone to call the facility kitchen. RN10 then walked back to the medication cart and poured laxative powder into a cup. RN10 then walked back to the refrigerator and grabbed cranberry juice to add to the laxative powder. After mixing the laxative and cranberry juice, RN10 entered R8's room. RN10 then proceeded to administer whole pills to R8, followed by the laxative and cranberry drink. RN10 was not…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$8,278 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $8,278 — penalty dated 2025-04-25

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to HAWAII HEALTH SYSTEMS CORPORATION — 7 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 13 rows in the source record cover these 12 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 73% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $317K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in HI