Kauai Veterans Memorial Hospital

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.24 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 33% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 0% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 20 beds and averages 20.0 residents a day — about 100% occupied, or roughly 0 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.85 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.84 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.73 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.30 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.07 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 2.04 to 1.35 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 10% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

21 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 9 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · Lcited before2024-09-10 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to assure kitchen staff used non-expired Hydrion test strips to test the kitchen's three-compartment sink for proper sanitizer level to assure sufficient concentration of sanitizing solution is present to effectively clean and sanitize dishware and failed to assure the kitchen dishwasher water temperature was used and logged at 180 degrees Fahrenheit (F) or more during the rinse cycle, failing to assure dishware and silverware were heat sanitized. This deficient practice puts all residents, staff, and visitors, who eat their meals at the facility, at risk for foodborne illness. The State Agency (SA) identified an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) at 483.60 (F812) on 09/03/24 at 10:12 AM. The facility failed to follow the proper sanitizing practices for the dishes and silverware to prevent the outbreak of foodborne illnesses as evidenced by final rinse temperatures of the water in the High Temperature Dishwasher (using heat sanitization) that were below…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · G2022-09-02 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to recognize the need for closer monitoring and additional interventions to manage a significant change in physical condition for one resident (R) in the sample. Although R4 was identified with a serious, potentially life-threatening wound infection that required extended intravenous (IV) antibiotic therapy, placement of a central line (IV access into a large central vein near the heart), and an upgrade of her status to a skilled nursing level of care, the facility failed to assess the impact the infection had on her functional needs, or to refer her to the appropriate specialists for her condition. As a result of this deficient practice, the facility placed R4 at an increased risk for avoidable declines and injuries. This deficient practice has the potential to affect all residents in the facility with worsening wounds. Findings include: Cross-reference to F637 Comprehensive Assessment after Significant Change. The facility failed to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-10 · tag F0637 — isolated
  Assess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to identify and report, within 14 days, a significant change and decline in activities of daily living (ADLs) for 1 of 12 residents sampled (Resident (R) 11). This deficient practice has the potential to affect other residents who have a decline in health status. Findings include: On 09/05/24 record review of R11's Electronic Health Record (EHR) Minimum Data Set (MDS) Annual assessment dated [DATE] and Quarterly review dated 04/26/24 revealed she had the following declines in functional limitations: limitations progressing from one lower extremity to two lower extremities, now requires substantial/maximal assistance with upper body dressing when she was previously partial/moderate assistance, and went from being able to roll left and right with partial/moderate assistance to roll left and right requiring substantial/maximal assistance. Review of R11's MDS assessments submitted to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) revealed no Significant…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-09-10 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to accurately document the health status of two residents reviewed, Residents (R)20 and 11. R20 was incorrectly identified as taking insulin for one day and R11 was incorrectly identified as having a diagnosis of Alzheimer's Disease when she has a diagnosis of severe vascular dementia without behavioral disturbance, psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance or anxiety. This deficient practice has the potential to affect all the residents at the facility if their health status is not correctly identified. Findings include: 1) On 09/05/24 record review of R20's Electronic Health Record (EHR) revealed R20's Minimum Data Set (MDS) admission assessment dated [DATE] identified her taking insulin for 1 day. Review of R20's EHR medication orders did not find any insulin orders. On 09/06/24 at 09:33 AM, interviewed Minimum Data Set Coordinator (MDSC) who confirmed resident does not take insulin and confirmed this was an error. MDSC believes it might have been a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-09-10 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and/or implement a resident-centered Comprehensive Care Plan (CP) for 2 of 13 residents (Residents 5 and 1) in the sample. Both residents (R) are insulin-dependent diabetics, yet neither had an active diabetes care plan. As a result of this deficient practice, these residents were placed at risk for a decline in their quality of life and were prevented from attaining their highest practicable well-being. This deficient practice has the potential to affect all the residents at the facility. Findings include: 1) Cross-reference to F689 Accident Hazards. A review of R5's CP revealed no active care plan developed for Activities of Daily Living (ADLs), which would include interventions addressing her mobility and transfer needs. Resident (R)5 is a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] for long-term care. Her active diagnoses include insulin-dependent diabetes, and chronic kidney disease. A review of R5's electronic health record…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-10 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 13 residents sampled (Resident 5) was free from accident hazards. Despite having a history of falls, an identified recent stroke with functional decline, and requiring a two-man assist for transfer, staff failed to lower Resident (R) 5's bed until her feet were touching the floor prior to manually transferring her from her bed to a shower chair, placing her at risk for an avoidable fall and/or injury. In addition, the facility failed to develop and implement a care plan for R5 that included/addressed her mobility and transfer needs. This deficient practice has the potential to affect all residents at the facility who require assistance to stand or transfer. Findings include: Resident (R)5 is a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] for long-term care. Her diagnoses include diabetes (added to diagnosis list at admission), chronic kidney disease (last updated on diagnosis list [DATE]), recurrent falls (last…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-09-10 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure all medications used in the facility were labeled in accordance with professional standards, including medication parameters for administration. Proper labeling of medications is necessary to promote safe administration practices and decrease the risk for medication errors. This deficient practice has the potential to affect all residents in the facility who take medications. Findings include: 1) On 09/06/24, beginning at 08:00 AM, medication pass observations were done with Registered Nurse (RN)6. At 08:01 AM observed RN6 preparing medications for Resident (R)11, who had a blood pressure that morning of 82/45 and when rechecked, 88/51. Observed the Metolazone 10 milligrams (mg) that RN6 prepared had a medication label on the blister pack that read: HOLD FOR SBP [systolic blood pressure] < [less than] 100 OR SYMPTOMATIC HYPOTENSION [low blood pressure]. Handwritten in red pen next to that was the following: SBP<80. Observed the Furosemide 40 mg that RN6 prepared had a medication label on the blister…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-09-22 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to provide safe storage for delivered food items placed into the kitchen's chiller and the dietary aides failed to perform appropriate hand hygiene while delivering meal trays to residents. These deficient practices have the potential to cause harm to their residents, staff, and visitors due to the possibility of contracting a food borne illness. Findings include: 1) On 09/19/23 at 10:32 AM, conducted a concurrent observation and interview with the kitchen chef (KC) of the kitchen's chiller located outside, across from the freezer. The chiller contained a box of sour cream tubs on the floor to the left and the right side contained crates with gallons of milk and juice. KC stated that they received the delivery of those items at 10:00 AM. On 09/19/23 at 10:45 AM, conducted a concurrent observation and interview with the Director of Food Services (DFS) of the same chiller. DFS stated that the delivery personnel will alert staff that the items were placed into the chiller. DFS further confirmed that the kitchen…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-09-22 · tag F0623 — isolated
  Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that the family or resident representative of one resident (R)19, out of three residents sampled, was notified of R19's transfer to the emergency room (ER) for an acute condition. This deficient practice fails to protect residents from possible inappropriate facility-initiated discharges from the facility. Finding includes: On 09/21/23 at 11:54 AM, progress notes revealed that R19 was transferred to the ER due to a low blood count. On 09/22/23 at 11:11 AM, conducted a concurrent observation of R19's electronic health record (EHR) and interview with the MDS Coordinator (MDSC) at the nursing station. MDSC confirmed that R19 was transferred to the ER on [DATE] as evidenced by an ER physician note documented on 08/13/23 at 09:21 AM that R19 refused her hemodialysis treatments (medical process to clean toxins out of the blood and to remove excess fluids) on Friday and Saturday. Progress notes revealed further that R19 was transferred from the ER to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-09-22 · tag F0638 — isolated
  Assure that each resident’s assessment is updated at least once every 3 months.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that quarterly comprehensive assessments were completed no less frequently than once every 3 months for 2 of 2 residents (R) in the sample. As a result of this deficient practice, the facility placed R1 and R16 at risk of not having their needs met. This deficient practice has the potential to affect all the residents at the facility for long-term care. Findings include: On 09/21/23 at 03:00 PM, during a review of Resident (R)1's electronic health record (EHR), it was noted that R1's last quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment had been completed on 05/20/23. The most recent MDS assessment showed an assessment reference date (ARD) or target date of 08/17/23, but had not been completed. On 09/21/23 at 03:24 PM, an interview was done with the MDS Coordinator (MDSC) at the Nurses' Station. Reviewing a Final Validation Report provided by the MDSC, it showed the assessment due on 08/17/23 had a Completion Date of 09/21/23. The MDSC confirmed that some of the care area assessments had been completed more than 14 days…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-22 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one resident (R) in the sample was free from accident hazards. Despite being unsteady on her feet and requiring at least a two-man assist to stand, staff failed to lock R11's shower chair before having her stand for a transfer, placing her at risk for an avoidable fall and/or injury. This deficient practice has the potential to affect all residents at the facility who require assistance to stand or transfer. Findings include: Resident (R)11 is an [AGE] year old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with admitting diagnoses that include age-related physical disability, Diabetes, Hypertension (high blood pressure), Heart Failure, and Morbid Obesity. A review of R11's most recent quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 08/13/23, shows that for Balance During Transitions and Walking, as well as Surface-to-Surface Transfer (transfer between bed and chair or wheelchair), R11 was marked…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-09-02 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, and interview, the facility failed to store, label, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. Residents (R) risk serious complications from foodborne illness as a result of their compromised health status. Unsafe and/or unsanitary food handling practices represent a potential source of pathogen exposure for all residents at the facility. Findings include: 1) On 08/30/22 at 09:50 AM an initial tour of the kitchen was done with Kitchen Staff (KS)1. Observations found the three-door refrigerator contained a plastic container of balsamic vinegar dressing and a plastic container of miso labeled with a used by date of 08/23/22. In the reach-in refrigerator there was a container of chickpeas that was not labeled to identify the food item and the use by date. The reach-in freezer found a plastic bag of frozen food that was not labeled. Inquired what was in the plastic bag, KS1 replied she did not know and threw out the food item. Upon entering the walk-in freezer, observed frozen red liquid on the floor close to the door jam with…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$34,588 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $34,588 — penalty dated 2024-09-10

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to HAWAII HEALTH SYSTEMS CORPORATION — 7 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 16 rows in the source record cover these 12 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

What families pay in HI