Red Oak Rehab and Care Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

49.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 25 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.10 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 6% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 12% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 58 beds and averages 28.7 residents a day — about 49% occupied, or roughly 29 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.54 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.77 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.63 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.41 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.59 on weekdays — 5% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.73 to 0.86 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 45% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

24 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 12 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2024-07-20 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, resident interview, staff interviews, equipment manual review, and policy review the facility failed to maintain patient care equipment in safe operating conditions by not completing safety and maintenance checks allowing the actuator mount to wear and break causing the resident to fall to the floor and sustain a compression fracture for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #2) reviewed. The facility reported a census of 26 residents. Findings include: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #2 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 indicating no cognitive impairment. The MDS also reported use of a sit to stand mechanical lift for transfers. On 7/19/24 at 12:40 PM Resident #2 stated on 6/12/24 she was halfway to the standing position when the sit to stand lift broke. Resident #2 stated she fell to the ground onto her buttocks. Resident #2 stated her buttocks did not hurt at first but when she was moved a little bit later it hurt. Resident #2…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · Gcited before2024-06-13 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, clinical record review, facility investigative file review, staff interviews and facility policy review the facility failed to transfer 1 of 3 resident (Resident #1) safely to prevent her from falling. Staff failed to obtain a gait belt prior to assisting Resident #1 from the toilet to the sink to wash her hands. Instead staff held on to the resident's pants during the transfer. As Resident #1 turned away from the sink, she lost balance, staff lost grip and the resident fell on her right shoulder. The resident was sent to the emergency room (ER) to be evaluated and was found to have a right proximal humerus fracture. The resident returned to the facility the same day with her right arm in a sling and recommendations to follow up with orthopedics. The facility reported a census of 28 residents. Findings include: According to the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment tool with a reference date of 2/13/24 Resident #1 had a Brief Interview of Mental Score of 3. A BIMS score of 3 suggested severe cognitive impairment. The MDS indicated Resident #1 utilized a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-06-17 · tag F0627 — isolated
  Ensure the transfer/discharge meets the resident's needs/preferences and that the resident is prepared for a safe transfer/discharge.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interviews and policy review the facility failed to provide sufficient notice of discharge for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #2) reviewed. The facility failed to ensure proper discharge planning was documented prior to discharge. The facility reported the census was 28. Findings include: Resident #2's Entrance Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident was admitted from a short term general hospital.The Discharge Return Not Anticipated MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed the discharge was unplanned and occurred on 4/29/26 to a short term general hospital. The document disclosed the facility staff completed the cognitive patterns indicating the resident presented with memory problems, severe impairment for daily decision making, and fluctuating inattention and disorganized thinking. The document included the resident had delusions, physical behavioral symptoms directed towards others, verbal behavioral symptoms directed toward others, rejection of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-06-17 · tag F0628 — isolated
  Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interviews, and policy review the facility failed to provide a bed hold and notify the Long-Term Care Ombudsman (LTCO) of transfer to a hospital for 2 of 3 residents (Residents #2, #5) reviewed. The facility reported a census of 28 residents. Findings include:1. Resident #2's Discharge Return Not Anticipated Minimal Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the discharge was unplanned and occurred on 4/29/26 to a short term general hospital. The clinical record's Census revealed Resident #2 discharged against medical advice (AMA) on 4/29/26 at 4:02 PM .2. Resident #5's Discharge Return Anticipated MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had an unplanned discharge on [DATE]. The clinical record's Census revealed Resident #5 transferred to the hospital on 3/6/26 at 7:51 AM, and was discharged on 3/25/26. On 6/17/26 at 9:49 AM the Administrator stated a bed hold had not been completed on Resident #5. The Administrator stated at this time she had not located the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-06-17 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, observations, staff interviews, and policy review the facility failed to represent an accurate assessment of residents' status during the observation period of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #3) reviewed. The facility reported a census of 28 residents.Findings include: The MDS assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #3 identified a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 3/15 indicating severe cognitive impairment. The document coded the resident required partial/moderate assistance for sitting to/from stand, transfers to/from a chair and ambulation up to 150'.Resident #3's Care Plan revised 4/16/26 revealed a focus with alteration in activities of daily living (ADLs) (revised 3/31/23) with staff interventions of independence with transfers and ambulation with a wheeled walker (revised 7/17/24). A focus area identified an ADL self care performance deficit (revised 7/24/24) with interventions of transfers independent with use of a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-17 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, observations, staff interviews, and policy review the facility failed to revise Care Plans for 2 of 3 residents (Residents #1, #4) reviewed. The facility failed to update the Care Plans with the residents' change in status and fall interventions. The facility reported a census of 28 residents. Findings include: 1. Resident #1's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15/15 indicating normal cognition. The document coded the resident was independent with toileting, dressing, grooming/hygiene, ambulation, transfers and bed mobility. The document provided the resident had a bed alarm that was used daily. The Care Plan revised 1/3/26 identified Resident #1 had functional performance deficits with staff interventions of dressing independent/1 person physical assistance (6/4/25), toilet use limited assist/no setup or physical help (6/4/25), walk in corridor independent/2 person physical assist…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-25 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, resident interview, clinical record review, facility policy review, and staff interviews the facility failed to re-evaluate the use of the motorized wheelchair quarterly to protect residents from accidents and injuries for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #1) reviewed. The facility reported a census of 30 residents. Findings include:Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) for Resident #1 dated 8/15/25 documented an admission date of 3/2/23 and a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 indicating intact cognition. The MDS documented diagnoses of hemiplegia (a medical condition that causes paralysis or weakness on one side of the body) following cerebral infarction affecting left non-domical side, heart failure, atrial fibrillation, anemia (a condition where the body does not have enough healthy red blood cells to carry oxygen throughout the body), diabetes mellitus, respiratory failure, visual hallucinations, and nausea without vomiting. The MDS revealed the resident required a total dependence on staff to complete transfers and used a wheelchair for…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-09-25 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, family interview, staff interviews, and policy review the facility failed to maintain medical records on each resident in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices that are complete and accurately documented for 2 of 13 residents (Residents #4 and #6). The facility failed to completely fill out the Medication Administration Record (MAR) - Treatment Administration Record (TAR) for the residents. The facility had a census of 30. Findings include: 1. Resident #4's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status of 14/15 indicating normal cognition. The document provided the resident had diagnoses of Non-Alzheimer's Dementia, anxiety, depression, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and took medications that included antipsychotics and antidepressants. The resident required oxygen. The resident's Care Plan dated 9/23/25 contained a focus area of shortness of breath related to COPD. Interventions for staff included use…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2024-10-24 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespread
  Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on document review, staff interview and facility policy review the facility failed to ensure a Registered Nurse (RN) was in the facility for eight (8) consecutive hours for 11 of 90 days reviewed (April 1st through June 30th 2024). The facility reported a census of 25 residents. Findings include: Review of the Payroll Based Journal (PBJ) staffing data report for the fiscal year quarter three (April 1st through June 30th, 2024) revealed there was no Registered Nurse (RN) hours for 4/29, 5/4, 5/18, 5/23, 5/31, 6/1, 6/2, 6/11, 6/15, 6/16, and 6/25/2024. Interview 10/22/24 at 12:52 PM with the Administrator confirmed that the facility did not have RN coverage listed on the PBJ. The Administrator confirmed these dates, and revealed that the facility only had one RN at the facility during this time. The Administrator revealed that her expectation would be for 8 hours RN coverage per day. Review of a facility provided document titled, Facility Assessment with a completed date of 7/15/2024 revealed: a. Federal law requires nursing homes to have sufficient staff to meet the needs of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-24 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to maintain sanitary practices by improperly serving food and failing to ensure proper sanitizing solution concentration. The facility reported a census of 25 residents. Findings include: On 10/23/24 at 9:36 AM, Staff A, [NAME] and Staff B, Dietary Aide (DA) were unable to locate sanitizer test strips to perform a sanitizing solution concentration check. Staff B stated she used detergent to clean the dining room tables. On 10/23/24 observations in the kitchen revealed the following: At 11:45 AM, Staff A, Cook, grabbed potato chips from a bag and placed them on a resident's plate with gloved hands she previously used to touch other non-food items. At 11:55 AM, Staff A placed the mashed potato serving scoop in the mashed potatoes and the handle came in direct contact with the food. She picked it up and continued using it with the same gloves she had touched non-food items. At 12:00 PM, Staff A scooped meatloaf sauce into a bowl and used her right gloved hand to push the sauce off the rim and into the bowl…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-10-24 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical document review, staff interview, and policy review the facility failed to provide a comprehensive care plan related to high risk medications for residents with an order for anticoagulants for 1 of 5 residents (Residents #10) reviewed. The facility reported a census of 25 residents. Findings include: Review of Resident #10's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed anticoagulant medication usage for 7 of the 7 day look back period. Review of Resident #10's Electronic Healthcare Record page titled Physician's Orders revealed an order for Apixaban 5mg oral tablet take 1 tablet by mouth twice daily. Review of Resident #10's Care Plan with a review date of 8/23/24 revealed no documentation of anticoagulant medications. Interview on 10/22/24 at 2:48 PM with Staff D, MDS coordinator, confirmed Resident #10 is on an anticoagulant. Staff D further revealed that anticoagulants should be on care plans. Interview on 10/22/24 at 3:03 PM with the Director of Nursing (DON) revealed that her expectation…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-06-13 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on clinical record review, resident interviews, staff interviews, and facility policy review the facility failed to ensure 2 of 3 (Resident #3 and #10) residents were treated with dignity and respect. The facility reported a census of 28 residents. Findings include: 1. According to the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment Resident #3 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13. A BIMS score of 13 suggested no cognitive impairment. The MDS listed the following diagnoses: cancer, anemia, hypertension, neurogenic bladder, obstructive uropathy, septicemia, diabetes mellitus, depression, and insomnia. The Care Plan focus area with an initiation date of 2/20/24 documented Resident #3 exhibits the following behaviors: being non-compliant with the use of her call light, asking for assistance and walking without staff assistance. On 6/11/24 at 1:51 PM Resident #3 stated she could not recall staff telling another staff member to shove whipped cream in her face and if they did it was probably a joke. When asked how staff treat her, she stated they are great. Staff…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

• Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-07-09 for 23 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to LANTIS ENTERPRISES — 5 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 23 rows in the source record cover these 11 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $386K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IA