Crest View Care Center
420 Gordon Avenue, Chadron, NE 69337 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 70 certified beds · (308) 432-3355 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Dec 2025
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has 1 actual-harm citation
- a high number of inspection citations overall (35) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its payroll-based staffing score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 4 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 2 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's staffing rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the staffing score rests on the facility's own payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 2 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 2 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 2 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 25.0% | 19.0% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 9.7% | 5.1% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.7% | 1.4% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.9% | 2.8% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 2.9% | 4.3% | 6.5% | better |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.3% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 2.8% | 4.5% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 21.3% | 18.2% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 9.6% | 19.3% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 80.8% | 96.1% | 95.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 9.8% | 4.0% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 28.9% | 25.9% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 14.6% | 20.7% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 9.5% | 2.0% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 38.5% | 75.9% | 79.4% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 0.95 | 1.81 | 1.67 | better |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 2.59 | 1.92 | 1.80 | worse |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
40.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 39 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 33.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 24 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.15 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 12% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 29% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 40.4%CMS range 28.3–53.4 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 9.6%CMS range 6.2–14.6 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 33.3% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 33.3% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 41.7% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.00 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 70 beds and averages 27.1 residents a day — about 39% occupied, or roughly 43 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.96 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.00 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.88 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.64 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.10 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.01 to 0.98 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 48% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
35 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 24 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-12-08 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09(I) Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to determine root causes of falls and implement interventions of these identified risks to prevent fall from recurring for 1 (Resident 13) of 2 sample residents. The facility identified a census of 29.Findings are: A record review of the facility's policy, Fall Prevention and Response (dated April 2025) revealed it is the policy of the facility to identify residents who are at high risk for falls and develop individual precautions to prevent further falls. Additionally, the policy included steps to follow when a fall occurs as follows: 1) complete an incident report and a fall scene investigation after each fall; 2) falls will be logged through the completion of incident reports in PointClickCare (the medical record system); 3) initiate neuro checks if the resident hit their head or if the fall was unwitnessed and the resident cannot state if they hit their head or not; 4) notify the resident's physician; 5)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-12-08 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.11(E) Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to dispose of expired foods, ensure hair was restrained in areas where food was prepared, and wash dishware at the required temperature to prevent the potential for foodborne illness for all residents in the facility. The facility census was 29. Findings Are: A.An observation on 12/01/2025 at 10:05 AM in the facility's dry storage room revealed the following items:-A jug of Sysco Classic Worcestershire Sauce which had an opened-on date of 7/22/2025 and was about 1/3 used. The jug had a Best By date of October 30, 2025. -Several cans of evaporated milk that had manufacture dates of 4/3/2024 and no expiration date. They were marked as being received on 10/1/2024. -13 cans of Casa Solana Sweetened Condensed Milk with expiration dates of 10/4/2025. An interview on 12/1/2025 at 10:20 AM with the Dietary Director (DD)-F confirmed the Worcestershire Sauce and Sweetened Condensed Milk were expired. DD-F also confirmed the evaporated milk cans expired 12-18 months from…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-12-08 · tag F0882 — widespreadDesignate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.18 Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure they employed a qualified infection preventionist. This had the potential to affect all residents. The facility census was 29.Findings Are: A record review of a Professional Staff document provided by the facility on 12/1/2025 revealed the facility's infection preventionist was the administrator. An interview on 12/8/25 at 1:40 PM with the Administrator confirmed the administrator was the facility's infection preventionist despite not possessing the qualifications required by regulation to fill this role. The administrator also confirmed the facility's Corporate Nurse Consultant had been assisting with the facility's infection control program remotely from another state, which did not meet regulatory requirements.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-12-08 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — widespreadEnsure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.04(B)(ii)(1)Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 5 sampled nurse aides completed 12 hours of annual ongoing training. This had the potential to affect all 29 residents who resided within the facility. Findings are: A record review of an untitled facility-provided document revealed a list of ongoing training hours for Nurse Aide-G (NA-G) between 10/11/24 and 9/26/25.A record review of the same document revealed 20 separate entries for coursework totaling 6.7 hours during that time period. An interview on 12/4/25 at 10:27 AM with the Administrator (ADM) confirmed the facility had not documented any other ongoing training hours for NA-G during that period except the 6.7 hours. The interview also confirmed NA-G did not have 12 hours as required and should have.
- Potential for harm · E2025-12-08 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — patternProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.02(D) Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to protect the residents' right to be free from physical and verbal abuse by another resident for 4 (Residents 2, 24, 27 and 32) of 4 sampled residents. The facility identified a census of 29.Findings are: A record review of the facility's Abuse Prevention Policy and Procedure (dated December 2022) revealed the following:- It is the policy of the facility that all residents have the right to be free from abuse.- The Administrator was listed as the facility's Abuse Prevention Coordinator.- Abuse was defined as the willful inflection of injury, unreasonable confinement, intimidation, punishment, with resulting physical harm, pain, or mental anguish.- Willful was defined as an individual having acted deliberately, not that the individual intended to inflect injury or harm.- Physical abuse was defined as including, but not limited to, hitting, slapping, kicking, biting, scratching, pushing, and pinching.-…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-12-08 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — patternPrevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to attempt, implement, and document non-pharmacological interventions prior to administering an as needed (PRN) antipsychotic medication for Resident 13; failed to ensure PRN antipsychotics were not continued beyond 14 days for Residents 2 and 13; and failed to ensure as needed psychotropic medications were not continued past 14 days without a rationale for Resident 2 and 28. The sample size was 5 and the facility census was 29.Findings Are: A record review of the facility policy Antipsychotic Use Policy and Procedure dated November 2022 revealed a policy statement To ensure neuroleptics, hypnotic, sedative, antidepressant, anxiolytic, and antipsychotic medications will be used only when it is necessary to treat a specific condition. In the procedure section, it states residents do not receive psychotropic drugs pursuant to a PRN order unless that medication is necessary to treat a diagnosed specific condition that is documented in the clinical record;…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-12-08 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — patternRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.02(H) Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to initiate investigations of potential abuse, complete thorough investigations of alleged violations, and maintain documentation of the investigations, for 5 (Resident 2, 13, 24, 27, and 32) of 5 sample residents. The facility identified a census of 29.Findings are: A record review of the facility's Abuse Prevention Policy and Procedure (dated December 2022) revealed the following:- The Administrator was listed as the facility's Abuse Prevention Coordinator.- Abuse was defined as the willful infliction of injury, unreasonable confinement, intimidation, or punishment, with resulting physical harm, pain, or mental anguish.- Willful was defined as an individual acting deliberately, not necessarily intending to inflict injury or harm.- An alleged violation was defined as a situation that is observed or reported by staff, residents, or others but has not been investigated.- Physical abuse was defined as…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-08 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — patternEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility failed to ensure the attending physician reviewed the monthly pharmacist recommendations and documented in 3 (Residents 2, 13, and 28) of 5 sampled residents' medical record that the identified irregularity had been reviewed and what, if any, action had been taken to address it. The facility census was 29. Findings Are: A. A record review of Resident 2's admission Record dated 12/4/2025 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. A record review of Resident 2's order summary revealed the resident had the following psychotropic medication orders: -Ativan (an antianxiety medication) oral tablet 0.5 milligrams (MG), give 1 tablet by mouth every 30 minutes as needed for anxiety or shortness of breath. The order had a start date of 10/22/2025. -Haloperidol lactate (an antipsychotic medication) 2 MG per milliliter (ML) oral concentration, give 1 ML PRN every 2 hours for anxiety, confusion or delirium. The order had a start date of 10/3/2025. -Haloperidol lactate 2 mg/mL oral…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-08 · tag F0628 — isolatedProvide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to notify the ombudsman of a discharge for 1 (Resident 37) of 1 sampled resident. The facility census was 29.Findings Are: A record review of Resident 37's admission Record dated 12/3/2025 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was discharged from the facility on 9/26/2025. A record review of Resident 37's Progress Note dated 9/26/2025 revealed the resident was discharged from the facility and left with their child and personal belongings. An interview on 12/2/25 at 2:05 PM with Social Services (SS) revealed SS did not send notifications to the ombudsman for any resident who had a planned discharge and as such, had not notified the ombudsman of Resident 37's discharge.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-08 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09(E) Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan (CCP, a document that includes measurable objectives and timetables to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that are identified in the comprehensive assessment) regarding Activities of Daily Living (ADLs, tasks related to personal care, such as dressing, eating, and mobility) for 1 (Resident 1) of 13 sampled residents. The facility identified a census of 29. Findings are: A record review of the facility's policy, Comprehensive Care Plans (dated 4/23/2019) revealed it is the policy of the facility to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with resident rights, that includes measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, mental, and psychosocial needs that are identified in the resident's comprehensive assessment. Additionally, the policy revealed that at minimum all services that are to be furnished to attain or maintain that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-08 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.12(D)(vi) Based on observation, record review, and interview; the facility failed to ensure a medication cassette reflected the correct administration time for 1 (Resident 27) of 6 sampled residents. The facility census was 29.Findings Are: A record review of the facility policy Labeling of Medications and Biologicals dated 2025 revealed all medications and biologicals used in the facility will be labeled in accordance with current state and federal regulations to facilitate consideration of precautions and safe administration of medications. A record review of the facility policy Medication Reconciliation Policy dated December 2022 revealed the facility would verify medication labels match physician orders and consider rights of medication administration each time a medication is given. A record review of Resident 27's December 2025 Medication Administration Record (MAR) revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had an order for atorvastatin…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 24 citations
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-08 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolatedEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.11(D) Based on observation, record review, and interview; the facility failed to ensure nutritive value was maintained for 2 (Residents 24 and 28) of 2 sampled residents who received pureed meals. The facility census was 29.Findings Are: A record review of a facility provided document Dining Manager- Pureed Beef & Broccoli Stir Fry dated 2025 revealed serving size options for 5, 10, and 20 servings. The ingredients for preparing 5 servings of the dish were:-1 quart and 1 cup of Beef & Broccoli Stir Fry,-1 teaspoon of beef base, and-3/4 cup of water. A record review of a facility provided bag revealed the bag contained Trio Low Sodium [NAME] Gravy Mix. The back of the bag contained preparation instructions which stated to make 2 cups of gravy, 1/2 cup of gravy mix should be prepared with 2 cups of water. A record review of a facility provided bag revealed the bag contained Excel Gold Mashed Potatoes. The back of the bag contained preparation instructions which stated to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-25 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09(H) Based on observations, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide services to maintain the personal hygiene for 1 (Resident 3) of 4 sampled residents. The facility identified a census of 30. Findings are: A record review of an admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident 3 on 6/8/2023 with diagnoses of Alzheimer's disease (a brain disorder that causes memory loss and other cognitive decline) and osteoarthritis (a chronic joint disease that causes pain and stiffness). A record review of Resident 3's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS- a standardized assessment tool used to evaluate the health of residents in nursing homes) with an Assessment Reference Date of 2/6/2025 indicated Resident 3 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS- a structured evaluation aimed at evaluating aspects of cognition in elderly patients) score of 3/15, which indicated Resident 3 had severe cognitive impairment. The MDS also revealed Resident 3 was fully dependent on staff for personal hygiene and dressing. A record review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-25 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Licensure Reference 175 NAC 12-006.09(H)(iii)(2) Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to provide monitoring of pressure ulcers (a localized injury to the skin and underlying tissue caused by prolonged pressure on a specific area of the body, often occurring over bony prominences like the heels, hips, or tailbone, leading to tissue damage and potential open sores if left untreated; this typically happens in people who are immobile or confined to a bed or wheelchair for extended periods) and treatments for the pressure ulcers as ordered for 1 (Resident 1) of 2 sampled residents. The facility identified a census of 30. Findings are: A record review of a facility policy Skin Program Policy with a last revised date of March 2019 revealed in the policy statement that care, and services would be provided to promote the healing of pressure ulcers that are present. The policy revealed procedures to complete a comprehensive wound assessment including site, stage, size, appearance of the wound bed, undermining, depth, drainage, and status of peri-wound tissue and the use…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-09-04 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.11(E) Based on observation, interview, and record review; the facility failed to ensure sanitary conditions in the kitchen and that food was used or discarded before their expiration dates to prevent the potential for foodborne illness. This had the potential to affect all 31 residents who ate from the kitchen. The Findings Are: A record review of facility policy Sanitation Inspection with copyright date of 2024 revealed all food service areas would be kept clean, sanitary, free from litter, rubbish and protected from rodents, roaches, flies, and other insects. An initial kitchen tour conducted on 8/28/24 at 9:06 AM revealed the following observations: -The metal shelving unit where the metal pots and pans were stored had gray fuzzy matter along the shelves and sides of the unit as well as brown and black debris on the bottom of the unit, just below bottom shelf. -On a shelf above the handwashing sink there was a plastic bin that contained an unopened bottle of PF Chang's Teriyaki sauce with a best by date of 12/5/2023. -On a shelf next to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-09-04 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — widespreadMake sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review; the facility failed to ensure there were no flying insects in the kitchen. This had the potential to affect all 31 residents who ate food prepared within the kitchen. The Findings Are: A record review of 2017 Nebraska Food Code, under section 6-501.111 revealed the premise shall be maintained free of insects. A record review of facility policy Pest Control Policy with revision date of March 2019 revealed that the environment would be monitored by facility staff and that there was to be an emphasis on the pest control program in the kitchen. A record review of facility policy Sanitation Inspection with copyright date of 2024 revealed that all food service areas shall be kept clean, sanitary, free from litter, rubbish and protected from rodents, roaches, flies, and other insects. An observation on 9/3/24 at 9:54 AM in the kitchen revealed 4 insects flying around in the kitchen. The insects were observed landing on and walking on the steamtable, food prep counter, and other various surfaces in the kitchen. An observation on 9/3/24 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-09-04 · tag F0940 — failed to train staff — widespreadDevelop, implement, and/or maintain an effective training program for all new and existing staff members.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Licensure Reference 175 NAC 12-006.04(B)(i) Based on record reviews and an interview, the facility failed to ensure five out of five sampled employees had completed initial orientation as required. This had the potential to affect all residents who resided at the facility. The facility identified a census of 31. Findings are: A record review of the Facility Assessment with a last updated date of 5/19/2024, under Section 3.4 Staff training/education and competencies, revealed training will be completed at orientation and refers to the orientation check list. A record review of Nurse Aide (NA) - G's personnel record provided by the facility revealed no evidence initial orientation had been completed. A record review of Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) - H's personnel record provided by the facility revealed no evidence initial orientation had been completed. A record review of NA-I's personnel record provided by the facility revealed no evidence initial orientation had been completed. A record review of Registered Nurse (RN) - B's personnel record provided by the facility revealed no…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-04 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — patternEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.12(A)(vi) Based on record review and interview; the facility staff failed follow up on recommendations by the facility pharmacist and failed to obtain the rational for dosage reductions for 4 (Resident 6, 14, 19 and 27) of 5 sampled residents. The facility staff identified a census of 31. Findings are: A. A record review of an admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident 6 on 6/17/2022 with diagnoses of Dementia and anxiety. A record review of Resident 6's Progress Notes with a date of 5/31/2024 revealed a monthly medication regimen review completed by the pharmacist with recommendation to check a vitamin D level. A record review of Resident 6's Progress Notes with a date of 3/31/2024 revealed a monthly medication regimen review completed by the pharmacist with a recommendation to recheck a thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) level due to a levothyroxine (thyroid medication) dose change on 1/29/2024. A record review of Resident 6's Progress Notes with a date…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-09-04 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — patternImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09 Based on record review and interview; the facility staff failed to follow up on a gradual does reduction (GDR) for psychotropic medications for 2 (Resident 6 and 27) and failed to obtain the rational for the continued use of an as needed (PRN) medication that exceeded 14 days for 2 (Resident 17 and 27) of 5 sampled residents. The facility staff identified a census of 31. The Findings Are: A. A record review of facility policy Antipsychotic Use Policy and Procedure with revision date of November 2022, revealed a policy statement To ensure neuroleptics, hypnotics, sedative, antidepressant, anxiolytic, and antipsychotic medications will be used only when it is necessary to treat a specific condition. The policy also revealed that PRN (as needed) orders for anti-psychotic drugs were to be limited to 14 days and could not be renewed unless the attending physician or prescribing practitioner evaluated the resident for the appropriateness of that medication. B. A record review of Resident 27's Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-04 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — patternEnsure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Licensure Reference 175 NAC 12-006.04(B)(ii)(1) Based on record reviews and an interview, the facility failed to ensure 12 hours of continuing education had been completed for 3 of 5 sampled employees. This had the potential to affect all residents who resided at the facility. The facility identified a census of 31. Findings are: A record review of the Facility Assessment with a last updated date of 5/19/2024 indicated continuing competence of nurse aides of at lest 12 hours per year is to be completed. A record review of a Course Completion History for Nurse Aide (NA) - K revealed a total of 3.85 training hours. A record review of a Course Completion History for Medication Aide (MA) - L revealed a total of 11.85 training hours. A record review of a Course Completion History for MA-M revealed a total of 9.1 training hours. A record review of a facility provided employee listing revealed NA-K was hired on 5/22/23, MA-L was hired on 9/9/22, and MA-M was hired on 9/1/22. An interview on 9/4/2024 at 9:55 An with the Administrator confirmed NA-K, MA-L, and MA-M had not met the required…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-04 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Licensure Reference 175 NAC 12-006.05(S) Based on observation, interview, and record review; the facility failed to protect resident dignity and right to privacy by ensuring privacy during personal cares for 1 (Resident 13) of 4 sampled residents. The facility identified a census of 31. Findings are: A record review of a facility policy Resident Rights Policy with a last revised date of November 2019, under section 8. Privacy and Confidentiality, indicated the resident has a right to personal privacy during personal cares. A record review of an admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident 13 on 6/8/2023 with a diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease. A record review of Resident 13's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS, a comprehensive assessment that includes medical, psychosocial, cognitive, and functional status to assist with developing care plans for individual residents) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 8/6/2024 revealed Resident 13 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 3/15, which indicated Resident 13 had severe cognitive impairment. The MDS also…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-04 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Licensure Reference 175 NAC 12-006.04(F)(i)(5) Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to notify the physician of significant weight loss for 2 (Resident 17 and 21) of 2 sampled residents. The facility identified a census of 31. Findings are: A. A record review of a facility policy Nutrition Unplanned Weight Loss Clinical Policy with a last revised date of March 2019 revealed a significant weight loss is 10% in six months. Under section Recording Weights and Follow-Up, the policy revealed nursing will notify the MD of the weight change. A record review of Resident 17's Vitals revealed Resident 17 weighed 164.5 pounds on 2/6/2024 and on 8/6/2024 Resident 17's weight was 143.5 pounds, which was a loss of 21 pounds or 12.77% loss since the weight on 2/6/2024. A record review of Resident 17's medical record did not reveal any evidence that Resident 17's physician was aware of the significant weight loss. An interview on 9/3/2024 at 2:24 PM with the Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed Resident 17's physician had not been notified of Resident 17's significant weight…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-04 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09(B) Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to accurately document falls with major injury for 1 (Resident 27) of 12 sampled residents and to accurately document antiplatelet use for 1 (Resident 6) of 12 sampled residents in their Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated comprehensive assessment tool used for care planning. The facility census was 31. The Findings Are: A. A record review of the Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument 3.0 User's Manual, a document published by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) to facilitate accurate and effective resident assessment practices in long-term care facilities, revealed that major injuries were those that resulted in bone fractures, joint dislocations, closed head injuries with altered consciousness, and subdural hematomas. A record review of Resident 27's MDS, dated [DATE] revealed in Section J that Resident 27 had had two or more falls with major injury since their prior…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-04 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record reviews and interview, the facility failed to develop interventions after falls for 1 (Resident 17) of 2 sampled residents. The facility identified a census of 31. Findings are: A record review of a facility policy Fall Prevention and Response Policy with a last revised date of October 2022 revealed post fall documentation included placing a new intervention after each fall. A record review of an admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident 17 on 8/17/2022 with diagnoses of epilepsy and vascular dementia. A record review of Resident 17's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS, a comprehensive assessment that includes medical, psychosocial, cognitive, and functional status to assist with developing care plans for individual residents) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 7/9/2024 indicated Resident 17 had severe cognitive impairment. The MDS also revealed Resident 17 had two falls without injury, two falls with minor injury, and one fall with major injury. A record review of Resident 17's Progress Notes with a date of 3/2/2024 indicated Resident 17 had an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-04 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Licensure Reference 175 NAC 12- 006.09(H)(i)(3) Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews; the facility failed to provide assistance with toileting and incontinence care for 2 (Resident 13 and 17) of 2 sampled residents. The facility identified a census of 31. Findings are: A. A record review of a facility policy ADL Assistance Provided Per Care Plan with a revision date of September 2022 revealed incontinent residents shall be checked in accordance with their care plan. A record review of an admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident 17 on 8/17/2022 with diagnoses of epilepsy and vascular dementia. A record review of Resident 17's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS, a comprehensive assessment that includes medical, psychosocial, cognitive, and functional status to assist with developing care plans for individual residents) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 7/9/2024 indicated Resident 17 had severe cognitive impairment. The MDS also indicated Resident 17 required extensive assistance with toileting. A record review of Resident 17's Care Plan with a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-04 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Licensure Reference 175 NAC 12- 006.09(I) Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews; the facility failed to ensure fall interventions were being implemented to prevent falls for 1 resident (Resident 17) and ensure safety during wheelchair locomotion with the use of footrests to prevent the potential for injury for 1 resident (Resident 13). The sample size was 3. The facility identified a census of 31. Findings are: A. A record review of a facility policy Fall Prevention and Response Policy with a last revised date of October 2022 indicated minimizing the risk for falls included to implement interventions to prevent falls. A record review of an admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident 17 on 8/17/2022 with diagnoses of epilepsy and vascular dementia. A record review of Resident 17's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS, a comprehensive assessment that includes medical, psychosocial, cognitive, and functional status to assist with developing care plans for individual residents) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 7/9/2024 indicated Resident 17 had severe…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-04 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09(J) Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09(J)(i)(1) Based on observations, record review and interview; the facility staff failed to implement interventions to manage weight loss for 2 (Resident 12 and 21) of 3 sampled residents. The facility staff identified a census of 31. The Findings Are: A. A record review of a facility policy Nutrition Unplanned Weight Loss Clinical Policy with a last revised date of March 2019 revealed a 5% weight loss in one month was significant. Under section Recording Weights and Follow-Up, the policy revealed nursing would notify the MD (the resident's medical provider) of the weight change. The policy also revealed in the Treatment/Management section that the staff and physician would identify pertinent interventions based on identified causes and overall resident condition, prognosis, and treatment wishes. A record review of Resident 21's Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated comprehensive assessment tool used for care planning, dated 8/6/24 revealed that Resident 21 had a weight loss of 5% or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-04 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09(H) Based on record review and interview, the facility staff failed to assess 1 (Resident 19) of 2 sampled resident's pain. The facility census was 31. The Findings Are: A record review of facility policy Pain Assessment and Management Policy with revision date of June 2021 revealed pain management is a multidisciplinary care process that includes assessing the potential for pain, effectively recognizing the presence of pain, identifying the characteristics of pain, addressing the underlying causes of the pain, developing and implementing approaches to pain management, identifying and using specific strategies for different levels and sources of pain, monitoring for the effectiveness of interventions, and modifying approaches as necessary. The policy also states to document the resident's reported level of pain with adequate detail (i.e., enough information to gauge the status of pain and the effectiveness of interventions for pain) as necessary and in accordance with the pain management program. A record review of Resident 19's Minimum…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-04 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09(H) Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to assess 1 (Resident 25) of 1 sampled resident's dialysis access port site daily. The facility census was 31. The Findings Are: A record review of a facility policy Dialysis with revision date of March 2019 revealed that the facility was to monitor the resident's access site for signs or infection at least daily. A record review of Resident 25's Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated comprehensive assessment tool used for care planning, dated 5/23/24 revealed Resident 25 had a diagnosis of end stage renal disease and was receiving dialysis (a treatment that removes waste and extra fluid from the blood when the kidneys are no longer functioning properly). A record review of Resident 25's care plan, with a last reviewed date of 8/26/24 revealed Resident 25 was receiving dialysis three times per week. There were no interventions in the care plan related to assessing Resident 25's dialysis port site. A record review of Resident 25's active physician's orders revealed an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-04 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Licensure Reference 175 NAC 12-006.18(B) Based on observation, interview, and record review; the facility failed to ensure infection control practices were implemented for oxygen administration for 1 (Resident 6) of 1 sampled residents. The facility identified a census of 31. Findings are: A record review of 1st Class Medical's document The Importance of Changing Your Nasal Cannula with a date of 10/2/2018 indicated to disinfect oxygen nasal cannulas use an alcohol wipe then allow to dry to prevent the potential for bacteria buildup and infections. An observation on 9/3/2024 at 10:24 AM revealed Resident 3 had been ambulating from the dining room and down the hallway to their room. Resident 3 had been dragging their oxygen's nasal cannula on the ground during ambulation, dragging it through food debris and dirt. Further observation s revealed Nurse Aide (NA)-C intervened and placed the nasal cannula back in Resident 3's nose without first disinfecting it. An interview on 9/3/2024 at 10:28 with NA-C confirmed NA-C did not sanitize the nasal cannula before applying back into Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-04-02 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — patternTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.02(8) Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to submit their investigation of a fall with major injury to the state agency within five working days for 3 (Residents 1, 2, and 3) of 4 sampled residents. The facility census was 34. The Findings Are: A record review of the facility policy, Abuse Prevention Policy and Procedure dated December 2022, revealed in the investigation section that the facility will investigate all incidences such as falls, bruises, medication errors, resident complaints, etc. The Reporting and Response section revealed that the Administrator, DNS, or Nursing Supervisor will make sure that a report is filed, that the internal investigation begins immediately, and the appropriate reporting takes place. A record review of a document provided by the facility Administrator revealed the facility attempted to fax a 5-page Investigation Report to (402) [PHONE NUMBER] on 3/6/24 at 5:47 PM. The document stated pages not sent due to No…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-02 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Licensure Reference 175 NAC 12-006.09D7(3) Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to implement interventions to reduce falls for 1 (Resident 1) of 3 sampled residents. The facility identified a census of 34. The findings are: A record review of the facilities' policy Fall Prevention and Response Policy with a last revised date of October 2022 revealed post-fall documentation includes root-cause analysis, interventions, response to interventions, and effectiveness of interventions. It also revealed the Interdisciplinary Team Fall Committee will meet and complete a fall review on each resident the following week where the care plan will be updated with a new or decided interventions. A record review of an admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident 1 on 8/19/2021 with diagnoses of: epilepsy, vascular dementia, depression, anxiety, and osteoarthritis. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date of 1/23/2024 revealed Resident 1 was severely impaired with daily decision-making skills. Resident 1 required moderate assistance…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-16 · tag F0940 — failed to train staff — patternDevelop, implement, and/or maintain an effective training program for all new and existing staff members.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
License Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.04B Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to provide education/orientation/in-services specific to elopement. The failure had the potential to affect all facility residents identifies as at risk for elopement. The facility identified a census of 33 residents at the time of the survey. Findings are: A record review of the facility's Incident Reports revealed there had been resident elopements on 10/20/2022, 3/18/2023, 7/27/2023, and 8/3/2023. A record review of the facility's training schedule and courses for the year 2023 revealed Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation were not included in the training schedule. In an interview on 8/15/23 at 9:30 AM with the Interim Administrator (IA)-A revealed they were not sure elopement staff education had occurred before or after residents had eloped from the facility due to changes in management. An interview on 8/15/23 at 11:38 AM with Maintenance (M)-revealed they did not receive education on elopements. An interview on 8/15/2023 at 10:00 AM with Nursing Assistant (NA)-C revealed the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-07-26 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
LICENSURE REFERENCE NUMBER 175 NAC 12-006.11E Based on observations, interviews, and facility policy and document review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety and to prevent foodborne illness. Specifically, the facility failed to keep the food items on the steam table at temperatures of 135 degrees Fahrenheit (F) or above, failed to ensure residents were not served food items from the steam table that were lower than 135 degrees F, failed to ensure food temperatures were recorded and food temperature logs were kept, and failed to date and label opened food items. This had the potential to affect all residents that received food items from the kitchen. Findings included: 1. Review of the facility's policy titled, Food: Preparation, revised 9/2017, revealed, 13. All foods will be held at appropriate temperatures, greater than 135 [degrees] F (or as state regulation requires) for hot holding, and less than 41 [degrees] F for cold food holding. 14. Temperature for TCS [time/temperature control…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-26 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
LICENSURE REFERENCE NUMBER 175 NAC 12-006.09D7a Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure staff observed residents take their medication to prevent accidents. This affected 1 (Resident #26) of 1 resident observed to have been given medication by a staff member who did not observe the resident take the medication before leaving the room. Findings included: A review of the facility's Medication Administration and Ordering Policy, dated 2019, revealed the policy did not address medications being left with a resident to administer without supervision of staff. A review of the admission Record for Resident #26 revealed the facility admitted the resident on 05/31/2023 with diagnoses that included type 2 diabetes mellitus, major depressive disorder, and cerebral infarction. A review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 06/07/2023, revealed Resident #26 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 9, which indicated the resident had moderate cognitive impairment. The resident required extensive…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2026-01-06 for 16 days
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to LANTIS ENTERPRISES — 5 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1 of 5 | 1.6 | -0.6 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 1 of 5 | 2.2 | -1.2 vs chain |
| Staffing | 4 of 5 | 2.8 | +1.2 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 2 of 5 | 1.6 | +0.4 vs chain |
The other 4 homes this chain runs (chain average 1.6★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| LANTIS, CAMMY | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; ADP OF THE SNF | since 09/01/2018 |
| LANTIS, MARY | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 09/01/2018 |
| LANTIS, TRAVIS | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 09/01/2018 |
| RINARD, SANDRA | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY | since 09/01/2018 |
| SOULEK, WENDY | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 09/01/2018 |
| MOORE, MICHAEL | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; ADP OF THE SNF | since 09/01/2018 |
| LANTIS ENTERPRISES, INC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 09/01/2018 |
| SCHUCKMAN, MEGAN | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/01/2022 |
| WICHMAN, HELEN | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 09/05/2023 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 21 rows in the source record cover these 9 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $289K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in NE
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Nebraska Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 285150. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-12-08, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.