Embassy Rehab and Care Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Met the expected recovery: 34.6% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 26 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.32 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 52% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 26% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 60 beds and averages 43.7 residents a day — about 73% occupied, or roughly 16 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.51 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.77 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.08 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.87 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.78 on weekdays — 24% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.83 to 0.60 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 54% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

27 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 17 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-21 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, staff interviews, and policies reviewed the facility failed to store, prepare, serve, and distribute food in accordance with professional standards. The facility failed to provide hygiene practices during food preparation, prevent cross contamination during meal service, complete temperature logs for resident snack refrigerator, and serve food at the appropriate temperatures.The facility reported a census of 42 residents. Findings include: Observed on 5/18/26 at 11:40 AM Staff A, cook, modify turkey with a roll, green bean casserole, pumpkin pie, and sweet potatoes to a pureed consistency. Staff A completed hand hygiene and donned gloves prior to the initiation of the processing. With the completion of each portion of the meal, the staff removed the components of the Robo Coup (food processor) and took them with the spatula to the dish area, placed them in the dish machine, and started it. The staff demonstrated inconsistency when removing the gloves, whether it was before placement of the dirty items in the dish machine or after placement in the dish machine.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-21 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to maintain an effective infection prevention and control program and provide specific policies related to all employees' hand hygiene during meal service (Resident #5, #24 and #25). The facility reported a census of 42 residents.indings include:1. Observations on 5/19/26 at 12:24 PM showed that Staff F, Dietary Aide, wore the same pair of gloves during the entire dining room service. Staff F picked up food plates and cups from resident tables and placed the dishware into the dirty dish room. Staff F then immediately returned to the dining room and failed to remove the soiled gloves or perform hand hygiene. During the observation, Staff F touched the residents' cups before asking if they were finished. Staff F also retrieved condiments for the residents while still wearing the same gloves.2. Observation on 5/20/26 at 7:43 AM showed the following:Staff C, a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA), played with Resident #25's hair, failed to perform hand hygiene, then obtained two coffee cups. Staff C then pulled the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-21 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, facility policy review and staff interview the facility failed to provide dignity with speaking to residents in the dining room and provide privacy during resident treatments. The facility reported a census of 42 residents. Findings include: 1. Observation on 5/18/2026 at 1:11 p.m., of Staff D, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) sitting at table with a resident while she was eating. Staff D said residents name to Resident #25 sitting 2 tables away from her. Resident #25 did not acknowledge Staff D. Staff D then repeated Resident #25's name. The resident again did not acknowledge her. Staff D then whistled at Resident #25 to get her attention. Resident #25 looked at Staff D and she proceeded to ask her in the dining room loudly if she was going to need to go to the bathroom. Staff D proceeded to say if she did she should go back to her room and turn on the light for us to help you. Resident #25 just looked at Staff D and never responded or moved her wheelchair. Interview on 5/21/2026 at 9:02 a.m., with the Administrator revealed the staff should not have been…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-21 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — isolated
  Provide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interview the facility failed to address dementia care for 1 out of 4 residents reviewed (Resident #5). The facility reported a census of 43 residents.Findings include:The The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #5 documented diagnoses of non-Alzheimer's Dementia. The MDS included a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 indicating no cognitive impairment. Review of the MDS dated [DATE] revealed active diagnosis of Non-Alzheimer's Dementia.Review of Resident #5's active diagnosis list revealed alcohol dependence with alcohol- induced persisting dementia. Review of Resident #5's care plan with a revision date of 5/8/26 lacked information regarding dementia care. Interview on 5/20/26 at 1:52 p.m., with the Director of Nursing (DON) revealed dementia should be addressed on the care plan if they have a diagnosis.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-21 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interviews and facility provided policy the facility failed to maintain accurate and verified documentation of task completion. Specifically, staff signed off on assigned duties as complete without actually performing the work or communicating with assigned personnel to confirm completion. The facility reported a census of 42 residents. Findings include: 1. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #2 documented diagnoses of non- Alzheimer's Dementia, arthritis and heart failure. The MDS showed the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 10 indicating moderate cognitive impairment. Review of facility provided documentation titled Follow Up Question Report on Toilet Transfer dated 5/1/26-5/20/26 revealed Staff G, Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) completed documentation not assigned to her on 15 separate occasions. Staff G was not the employee assigned to these tasks. Review of facility provided documentation titled follow up question report on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-23 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical records, facility policy and staff interviews the facility failed to provide a safe environment free from physical abuse for 1 of 3 (Resident #1) residents. The facility reported a census of 45 residents. Findings Include:1. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #1 documented diagnoses of neurogenic bladder, anxiety disorder and dementia with other behavioral disturbances. The MDS showed the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 3, which indicated severe cognitive impairment.The Progress Note dated 7/5/25 at 6:45 AM for Resident #1 showed Staff C, Registered Nurse (RN) documented the following: At about 3:45 AM one of the night CNA's notified me that she met another CNA yelling, restraining and hitting a resident inappropriately in his room during rounds. According to her this happened while they were trying to get a resident changed. I was notified and immediately went and assessed the resident. There were no physical injuries on the resident. No bruises…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · E2025-06-05 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on observations, staff interviews and policy review the facility failed to provide a clean homelike environment free from offensive odors. The facility reported a census of 45. Findings include: 1. Observation on 6/2/25 at 10:12 a.m., noted upon entrance into the building a strong urine odor. 2. Observation on 6/3/25 at 11:41 a.m., urine odor noted in hallways throughout the building. 3. Observation on 6/3/25 at 3:33 p.m., urine odor noted in hallways throughout the building and around the nursing station. 4. Observation on 6/4/25 at 9:36 a.m., urine odor noted in hallways throughout the building and around the nursing station. Interview on 6/4/25 at 12:09 p.m., with the Administrator revealed the hallways should not have urine smell and the facility will be working on the right away.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-06-05 · tag F0628 — pattern
  Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, interviews, and facility policy, the facility failed to ensure bed hold notice was signed by residents and or the resident's responsible person when residents transferred out of the facility. The bed hold notice also failed to notify the amount per day the resident or representative agreed to pay for 2 of 4 residents reviewed (Residents #13, # 21 and #40). The facility failed to notifiy the Long Term Care Ombudsman of discharge from facility for 1 of 4 residents reviewed (Resident #46). The facility reported a census of 45 residents. Findings include: 1. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #21 documented reentry to the facility on 4/11/25 for a short term hospital stay. Review of the Clinical Census report for Resident #21 revealed the following information: a. 12/15/24- hospital b. 12/20/24- active c. 4/4/25- hospital d. 4/11/25- active Review of the Progress Notes for Resident #21 revealed the following: a. On 12/15/24 at 5:58 PM, Resident admitted…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-06-05 · tag F0732 — pattern
  Post nurse staffing information every day.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations and staff interviews, the facility failed to post accurate nurse staffing data in a prominent location and visible to residents and visitors. The facility reported a census of 45 residents. Findings include: 1. Observation on 6/2/25 at 12:49 p.m., lacked a daily staffing sheet visible for residents and public to locate. 2. Observation on 6/3/25 at 2:19 p.m., lacked a daily staffing sheet visible for residents and public to locate. 3. Observation on 6/4/25 at 9:27 p.m., lacked a daily staffing sheet visible for residents and public to locate. Interview on 6/4/25 at 9:29 a.m., with Staff C, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) and Staff D, Registered Nurse (RN) revealed the staffing book on the counter is where the sheet is kept. Staff D opened the book to reveal the daily sheet. Staff C verified this is the only place where the hours are posted and all of the daily sheets are kept in the office after they are changed out. Review of facility provided policy titled Posting of Daily Nursing Hours Policy with a revision date of March 2019 revealed it is the policy to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-05 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, staff interviews, and facility policy review the facility failed to ensure proper sanitary conditions in the kitchen area. The facility identified a census of 45 residents. Findings included: The initial kitchen walk through on 6/2/25 at 10:55 AM with the Dietary Manager (DM) revealed the following: A clean dish cart contained a variety of scattered food debris. Three food preparation tables with shelving underneath showed a thick layer of grease build-up on the shelves, pans and food containers. The floor contained an accumulation of food debris and a variety of dried liquid. The freezer units with a variety of food debris in the bottom of the units. The refrigerator units with debris with a variety of food debris in the bottom of the units. The top of the dishwasher not visible due to a layer of white, crusty material. The snack cart with food debris build-up. The warming table pan covers found with dried food debris and dried liquid. Back splash of oven wall covered with multiple large food debris and dried liquid. During the initial walkthrough the DM…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to LANTIS ENTERPRISES — 5 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 23 rows in the source record cover these 11 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $635K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 11% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IA