Indian Hills Manor
1720 North Spruce, Ogallala, NE 69153 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 82 certified beds · (308) 284-4068 Medicare & Medicaid certified
The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has 1 actual-harm citation
- a high number of inspection citations overall (35) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
- its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (1/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 1 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 1 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 1 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 1 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 1 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 39.8% | 19.0% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 16.8% | 5.1% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 1.5% | 1.4% | 0.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 1.7% | 2.8% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 2.6% | 4.3% | 6.5% | better |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.3% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 3.3% | 4.5% | 3.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 30.8% | 18.2% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 10.8% | 19.3% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 94.1% | 96.1% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 18.5% | 4.0% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 25.4% | 25.9% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 40.4% | 20.7% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 6.5% | 2.0% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 39.3% | 75.9% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 20.8% | 20.7% | 22.6% | typical |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 10.7% | 11.4% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.53 | 1.81 | 1.67 | typical |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 3.89 | 1.92 | 1.80 | worse |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
36.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 33 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 25.8% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 31 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.20 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 23% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 16% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 36.2%CMS range 24.8–49.8 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | worse than U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 9.8%CMS range 5.5–15.1 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 25.8% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 32.3% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 29.0% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 95.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 5.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 6.3%CMS range 3.2–11.6 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.17 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 82 beds and averages 36.7 residents a day — about 45% occupied, or roughly 45 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.56 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.50 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.71 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.34 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 2.65 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.53 to 0.44 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 56% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
35 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 24 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · Hcited before2024-04-15 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — patternProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09D8b Based on observations, record review and interview; the facility failed to implement, evaluate and/or revise nutritional interventions to address ongoing and significant weight loss for 3 (Residents 3, 4 and 27) of 4 sampled residents. The facility census was 34. Findings are: A. Review of a Weight Assessment policy with a revision date of 3/19 revealed it was the policy of the facility to prevent, monitor, and intervene to prevent undesirable weight loss for the residents. The following procedure was identified regarding weight assessment: -staff were to measure the resident's weight on admission, the next day and then weekly thereafter, -the weights were to be recorded in each resident's individual medical record, -any weight change of 5 percent (%) or more since the previous weight would be retaken the next day. If the weight was confirmed, the Registered Dietician (RD) was to be notified in writing, -the RD was to review the weight record by the 15th of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-05-21 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.11(E) Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure outdated food items were not available for use, items were labeled correctly, and failed to perform proper hand hygiene and change gloves while preparing food to prevent the potential for cross contamination and food-borne illness. The facility identified a census of 32. This had the potential to affect all residents who ate out of the kitchen.Findings are: A.Record review of a policy titled Food Safety Requirements, undated, revealed under Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines number 1 states Food safety practices shall be followed throughout the facility's entire food handling process. This process begins when food is received from the vendor and ends with delivery of the food to the resident. Elements include the following: b. Storage of food in a manner that helps prevent deterioration or contamination of the food, including from growth of microorganisms. c. Preparation…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-05-21 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — widespreadEnsure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.04(B)(ii) Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 5 sampled nurse aides completed 12 hours of in-service educations and 4 hours of dementia training as required.Findings Are: A record review of an untitled facility-provided document revealed a list of current employees of the facility with name, department, job title, and hire dates. The document also revealed Nurse Aide - A (NA-A) was hired on 2/1/2022. Record review of facility staffing documentation revealed that Nurse Aid (NA)-A completed 1.55 training hours between 2/1/2025 and 2/1/2026 which included the following training, completion dates, and hours:-Basics of Tuberculosis Self-Paced, completed 5/15/25, 0.25 hours.-HIPAA documents review, completed 5/15/25, 0.25 hours-HIPAA Do's and don'ts of social media and electronic communication self-paced, completed 5/15/25, 0.25 hours-Infection control: Handwashing, completed 5/15/25, 0 hours-[NAME] compliance and ethics program overview,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-21 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — patternEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.12(A)(vi) Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the consultant pharmacist completed a Medication Regimen Review every month as required for 3 of 5 sampled residents (Residents 2, 6, and 25 ). The facility identified a census of 32.Findings Are: Record review of a facility policy dated 11/2022 labeled Medication Regimen Review revealed the following information: - The requirements associated with the Medication Regimen Review (MRR) apply to all residents, whether short or long stay - The pharmacist shall document, either manually or electronically, that each medication regimen review has been completed - Each MRR shall be signed by the pharmacist - The consultant pharmacist shall schedule at least one monthly visit to the facility and shall allow for sufficient time to complete all required activities. A. A record review of Resident 2's admission Record dated 5/20/2026 revealed Resident 2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-05-21 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — patternDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.18(A)Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure 3 of 5 sampled residents (Residents 14, 21, 25) had received or declined influenza and pneumococcal immunizations as required. The facility identified a census of 32 residents. A. Record review of Resident 14's face sheet revealed they were admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Record review of Resident 14's Electric Medical Record (EMR) revealed no evidence of Resident 14 receiving or refusing the Pneumococcal immunization, or being medically ineligible to receive it. B. Record review of Resident 21's face sheet revealed they were admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Record review of Resident 21's EMR revealed no evidence of Resident 21 receiving or refusing the pneumococcal immunization, or being medically ineligible to receive it. C. Record review of Resident 25's face sheet revealed they were admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Record review of Resident 25's EMR revealed no evidence of Resident 25…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-05-21 · tag F0887 — patternEducate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.18(A)Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure 3 of 5 sampled residents (Residents 14, 21, 25) had received or declined COVID-19 (coronavirus disease 2019, a highly contagious respiratory illness caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus) immunizations as required. The facility identified a census of 32 residents. A. Record review of Resident 14's face sheet revealed they were admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Record review of Resident 14's Electric Medical Record (EMR) revealed no evidence of Resident 14 receiving or refusing the COVID-19 immunization, or being medically ineligible to receive it. B. Record review of Resident 21's face sheet revealed they were admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Record review of Resident 21's EMR revealed no evidence of Resident 21 receiving or refusing the COVID-19 immunization, or being medically ineligible to receive it. C. Record review of Resident 25's face sheet revealed they were admitted to the facility on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-21 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09(F) Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure 1 (Resident 21) of 2 sampled resident's care plan accurately reflected their physical mobility and psychosocial care, and 1 (Resident 25) of 2 sampled resident's care plan accurately reflected their physical mobility and activities of daily living (ADLs). The facility identified a census of 32 residents. Findings are: Record review of a facility policy titled, Care planning, last revised March 2019, revealed the residents' care plans should be updated between care conferences to reflect current care needs as changes occur. A. A record review of Resident 21's admission record dated 5/21/26 revealed an original admission date of 10/17/2025. The admission record revealed the following relevant diagnoses with onset dates: -Meniere's Disease, unspecified ear (a chronic inner ear disorder caused by an abnormal buildup of fluid, that causes sudden severe vertigo, hearing loss, ringing in the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-05-21 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09(I) Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure oxygen concentrators were turned off when not in use for 2 (Residents 30 and 3) of 5 sampled residents to prevent the potential for accidents. The facility identified a census of 32 residents.Findings are: A record review of the American Lung Association website, https://www.lung.org/lung-health-diseases/lung-procedures-and-tests/oxygen-therapy/using-oxygen-safely, oxygen is a safe gas and is non-flammable, however, it supports combustion. Materials burn more readily in an oxygen-enriched environment. In the Store Oxygen Safely section it stated to turn off the oxygen when not in use, don't set the cannula or mask on a bed or chair if the oxygen is turned on. A:Record review of Resident 30's physician order dated 7/9/2025 revealed the resident was to be administered oxygen at 2 liters per minute to maintain oxygen saturation above 90%. Observation on 5/18/2026 at 10:27 AM, 11:35 AM, 12:41 PM, 1:44 PM and 2:51 PM revealed the oxygen concentrator (a medical…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-21 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09 (J)(iii)Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure 2 of 2 sampled residents (Residents 14 and 22) received hydration to meet their daily needs. The facility identified a census of 32 residents.Findings are: Record review of a facility policy titled, Resident hydration and dehydration prevention policy, last revised March 2019, revealed the facility would provide adequate hydration, and prevent and treat dehydration, which included providing and encouraging intake of bedside, snack, and mealtime fluids on a daily and routine basis as a part of daily care. A. Record review of Resident 14's face sheet revealed they were admitted to the facility on [DATE] and diagnosed with Alzheimer's disease (a type of dementia that affects memory, thinking, and behavior), constipation (a problem with passing stool infrequently or because it is hard), moderate intellectual disabilities (limitation in intellectual function, understanding and use of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-21 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.18 Based on observation, interview, record review, the facility failed to ensure oxygen tubing was maintained in a clean and sanitary manner, changed and dated according to physician orders and facility policy to prevent the potential for infection for 1 (Resident 30) of 5 sampled residents. The facility identified a census of 32 residents.Findings Are: Record review of facility policy titled Oxygen Usage Policy with revision date of January 2022 revealed under Care of Equipment section, item number 5 titled oxygen tubing, the policy read to change tubing and mask/cannula at least every two weeks and change tubing if visibly soiled or if cannula/mask becomes contaminated. Record review of Resident 30's physician order dated 7/9/2025 reveals the resident is to be administered oxygen at 2 liters per minute to maintain oxygen saturation above 90%. The resident also had an order to change their oxygen tubing every two weeks and to ensure the tubing was dated. Observations on 5/18/2026 at 10:27 AM, 11:35 AM, 12:41 PM, 1:44 PM and 2:51 PM revealed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-05-21 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — isolatedImplement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 5 sampled residents' (Resident 14) medication regimens were free from unnecessary antibiotics. The facility identified a census of 32 residents. Record review of Resident 14's face sheet revealed they were admitted to the facility on [DATE] and diagnosed with Alzheimer's disease (a type of dementia that affects memory, thinking, and behavior), constipation (a problem with passing stool infrequently or because it is hard), moderate intellectual disabilities (limitation in intellectual function, understanding and use of language, and adaptive behavior), chronic kidney disease, and history of urinary tract infections.A record review of Resident 14's physician orders revealed an order for Bactrim (sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim, an antibiotic) 400-80 milligrams by mouth, once a day, ordered for personal history of urinary tract infections, dated 5/02/2026.A record review of Resident 14's Medication Administration Record (MAR) for May 2026…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 24 citations
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-11 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.02(H) Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to report an incident of resident-to-resident abuse to the State Agency within 2 hours, and failed to submit an investigation report to the State Agency within 5 working days of the incident. This affected 2 (Residents 1 and 2) of 2 sampled residents. The facility identified a census of 38. A record review of Resident 1's face sheet revealed Resident 1 was admitted on [DATE] with unspecified dementia (a decline in cognitive function affecting memory, thinking, and behavior), weight loss, unsteadiness on feet, and type 2 diabetes mellitus (a metabolic disorder where the body does not regulate blood sugar effectively).A record review of Resident 2's face sheet revealed Resident 2 was admitted on [DATE] with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (a progressive lung disease that restricts breathing, often caused by smoking), pneumonia (an infection that inflames the air sacs in the lungs), bladder dysfunction,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-03-04 · tag F0730 — widespreadObserve each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Licensure Reference 175 NAC 12-006.04(B)(ii)(1) Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that 4 of 5 sampled employees had completed at least 12 hours of ongoing training for the year as required. This had the potential to affect all residents who reside within the facility. The facility identified a census of 27. Findings are: A record review the facility's Facility Assessment Tool with a date of 2/26/2025 revealed all training will be completed at least upon orientation, annually, and as needed of at least 12 hours per year. Topics of training included dementia, abuse/neglect, effective communication, resident's rights, infection control, culture changes, and orthopedic special care. A record review of an undated staff list provided by the facility revealed the following: - Medication Aide (MA) - D was hired on 8/19/2010. - Nurse Aide (NA) - A was hired on 7/1/2022. - MA-G was hired on 4/21/2013. - MA-F was hired on 5/3/2022. A record review of MA-D's Training Hours from 8/19/2023-8/19/2024 revealed MA-D had a total of 0.5 hours of ongoing training.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-03-04 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference 12-006.18 Licensure Reference 12-006.09 (D)2 Based on observations, record review, and interview, the facility failed to implement a water management program as required to monitor and prevent the potential for legionella and other waterborne pathogens. This had the potential to affect all residents that resided within the facility. The facility also failed to perform hand hygiene as required during wound care for 1 (Resident 2) of 1 sampled resident. The facility identified a census of 27. Findings are: A. A record review of a facility policy titled, Water system management program prevention plan for legionella, and dated 2022, revealed in the policy explanation and compliance guidelines section: 2. The maintenance director maintains documentation that describes the facility's water system. 6. Control measures will be applied to address potential hazards at each control point. The measures shall be specified in the water management program action plan. The Sample Water System Surveillance…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-03-04 · tag F0940 — failed to train staff — widespreadDevelop, implement, and/or maintain an effective training program for all new and existing staff members.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Licensure Reference 175 NAC 12-006.04(B)(i) Based on record reviews and interview, the facility failed to ensure 5 of 5 sampled employees had completed initial orientation training within 2 weeks after beginning employment that included resident rights and emergency procedures as required. This had the potential to affect all residents who resident within the facility. The facility identified a census of 27. Findings are: A record review the facility's Facility Assessment Tool with a date of 2/26/2025 revealed training will be completed at orientation, annually, and as needed. Trainings will include effective communication, resident right's abuse/neglect, infection control, and culture change. A record review of an undated staff list provided by the facility revealed the following: - Cook-H was hired on 11/7/2024. - Dietary Aide (DA) - I was hired on 1/7/2025. - The Director of Nursing (DON) was hired on 2/16/2025. - Nurse Aide (NA) - B was hired on 1/6/2025. - NA-C was hired on 12/2/2024. A record review of Cook-H's personnel file documents provided by the facility revealed no…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-03-04 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — widespreadEnsure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Licensure Reference 175 NAC 12-006.04(B)(ii)(1) Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that 4 of 5 sampled employees had completed at least 12 hours of ongoing training in the year which included dementia management training and resident abuse prevention training. This had the potential to affect all residents who reside within the facility. The facility identified a census of 27. Findings are: A record review the facility's Facility Assessment Tool with a date of 2/26/2025 revealed all training will be completed at least upon orientation, annually, and as needed of at least 12 hours per year. Topics of training included dementia, abuse/neglect, effective communication, resident's rights, infection control, culture changes, and orthopedic special care. A record review of an undated staff list provided by the facility revealed the following: - Medication Aide (MA) - D was hired on 8/19/2010. - Nurse Aide (NA) - A was hired on 7/1/2022. - MA-G was hired on 4/21/2013. - MA-F was hired on 5/3/2022. A record review of MA-D's Training Hours from…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-03-04 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — patternKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Licensure Reference 175 NAC 12-006.17 Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to protect the private health information of 3 (Residents 9, 23, and 32) of 4 sampled residents. The facility identified a census of 27. Findings are: A continuous observation on 2/27/25 from 7:26 AM to 8:00 AM revealed Registered Nurse (RN-J) administering medications in the dining room using a laptop computer mounted on a mobile medication cart. The observation revealed RN-J preparing medications for Resident 32. RN-J took the prepared medications to Resident 32's table, leaving the computer screen open with Resident 32's private health information visible while they walked to the resident and administered the medications. RN-J then returned to the medication cart, marked the medications as administered in the computer and proceeded to the next resident. The observation revealed RN-J preparing medications for Resident 9. RN-J took the prepared medications to Resident 9's table, leaving the computer screen open with Resident 9's private health information visible while they…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-03-04 · tag F0655 — patternCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09(F)(i) Based on interview and record review the facility failed to develop and implement a baseline care plan within 48 hours of admission for 3 (Resident 35, 27, and 23) of 4 sampled residents. The facility identified a census of 27. The findings are: A record review of a Baseline Care Plan Policy dated 4/23/2019 revealed the baseline care plan will: a. Be developed within 48 hours of a resident's admission. b. Include the minimum healthcare information necessary to properly care for a resident including but not limited to: i. Initial goals based on admission orders ii. Physician orders iii. Dietary orders iv. Therapy services v. Social Services vi. PASARR recommendations, if applicable. A. A record review of an admission face sheet for Resident 35 revealed an admission date of 1/30/25. Resident 35 was admitted to the facility for Palliative Care (care that is focused on symptom control, pain relief, and quality of life). A record review of an admission facesheet for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-03-04 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Licensure Reference 175 NAC 12-006.09(H)(vi)(3)(g) Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that monitoring during the course of their acute illness was documented for 3 (Resident 3, 8, and 18) of 3 sampled residents . The facility identified a census of 27. The findings are: A record review of a Change of Condition Policy dated 3/2019 revealed on page 4 (B.)- The Nurse will record information relative to changes in the residents condition or status in the resident's medical record. The residents' condition is assessed and reported in a timely manner either verbally or written if the resident experiences signs and symptoms of infection. A. A record review of Resident 18's admission face sheet revealed an admission date of 3/24/22. A record review of Resident 18's pertinent diagnoses include: 1. Unspecified dementia (a condition where cognitive decline and memory loss occur, but the specific underlying cause cannot be determined). 2. Ventricular Tachycardia (a fast, abnormal heart rhythm). 3. Cardiomyopathy (disorder that affects the heart muscles ability to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-04 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Licensure Reference 175 NAC 12-006.09(D) Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set (MDS, a federally mandated comprehensive assessment tool used to determine a resident's functional capabilities and helps nursing home staff identify health problems) accurately reflected active diagnoses for 1 (Resident 3) of 12 sampled residents. The facility identified a census of 27. Findings are: A record review of a facility policy, MDS Policy with a revision date of March 2019 revealed a the purpose of the policy was to ensure the timeliness and accuracy of all MDS' by ensuring the facility staff followed the guidelines laid out in the Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument 3.0 User's Manual (RAI Manual, a document published by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) to facilitate accurate and effective resident assessment practices in long-term care facilities.) A record review of the RAI Manual with an effective date of 10/1/2023 revealed the following in regarding to Section I: Active Diagnoses under steps for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-04 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Licensure Reference 175 NAC 12-006.09(H)(i)(3) Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to provide bathing services during isolation precautions for 1 (Resident 3) of 1 sampled resident. The facility identified a census of 27. Findings are: A record review of a facility policy, ADL Assistance Provided Per Care Plan with a revised date of 9/2022 revealed bathing and showering would be provided as needed based upon the resident's desires, assessment, care plan, and ADL (Activities of Daily Living) assistance deemed necessary. A record review of an admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident 3 on 1/11/2022 with a diagnosis of Dementia (a progressive condition marked by the development of multiple cognitive deficits such as memory impairment, aphasia, and the inability to plan and initiate complex behavior.) A record review of Resident 3's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS, a federally mandated comprehensive assessment tool used to determine a resident's functional capabilities and helps nursing home staff identify health problems) with an Assessment…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-04-15 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — widespreadHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.06B Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.05(7) Based on record review and interivews; the facility failed to resolve ongoing grievance concerns and failed to assure residents were able to voice concerns without retaliation by the staff. This had the potential to affect all residents. The facility census was 34. Findings Are: A. Record review of the facility policy Grievance/ Concern with a revision date of 3/2019 revealed the purpose of the policy was to ensure the residents had the right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and without fear of discrimination or reprisal. The policy further revealed that grievances/concerns reported during resident and/or family council meetings were to be transferred to a grievance form and given to the Grievance Official or Administrator. In addition, all grievances/concerns were to be logged and completed by Social Services Director (SSD) or assigned to an appropriate designated person for investigation. A written report of the investigation and recommended action(s) were to be…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-04-15 · tag F0801 — widespreadEmploy sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Licensure Reference Number: 175 NAC 12-006.04D2a Based on record review and interview; the facility failed to ensure the Dietary Manager (DM) had the credentialing to meet the requirements for the position. This had the potential to affect all residents who consumed food from the kitchen. The facility census was 34 with a total sample size of 19. Findings are: Review of the facility Job Description for the role of Dietary Service Director dated 7/1/2018 revealed necessary qualifications included the completion of a Dietary Manager certification course. During an interview on 4/9/24 at 10:08 AM, the [NAME] President of Operations and the facility Administrator confirmed the current Dietary Manager did not have the required training to meet the qualification for the DM position.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-04-15 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.11E Based on observation, record review and interview; the facility staff failed to: 1) utilize handwashing and gloving techniques; and 2) store, prepare and serve food in a manner to prevent the potential for cross contamination and/or food borne illness. These practices had the potential to affect all residents who were served meals from the kitchen. The facility identified a census of 34. Findings are: A. Review of the undated facility policy Date Marking for Food Safety revealed the following regarding the system used to ensure the safety of ready-to-eat food items: -all food to be clearly marked to indicate the date by which the food was to be consumed or discarded. -the individual opening or preparing a food was to be responsible for date marking the food at the time the food was opened or prepared. -the marking system was to consist of the day/date of opening and the day/date the item was to be discarded. -the discard day/date was not to exceed the manufacture's use-by date, or 4 days, whichever was the earliest. The date when food…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-04-15 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — widespreadHave a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.07C Based on record review and interview; the facility failed to assure the facility had an effective quality assurance and performance improvement program. This had the potential to affect all residents who resided within the facility. The facility census was 34. The findings are: A record review of a facility provided policy titled QAA (Quality Assurance and Assessment) and QAPI (Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement) Policy and Procedure with a revision date of March 2023 revealed in the Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines that the QAA committee was to consist at a minimum of the Director of Nursing (DON), Medical Director (MD), Infection Preventionist (IP), and three other members of the facility staff. The program was to be ongoing, comprehensive and would address the full range of care and services provided by the facility. The policy stated the facility would develop and implement appropriate plans of action to correct identified quality deficiencies and that they would meet at least quarterly and as needed to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-04-15 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.17 Based on observation, record review, and interview; the facility failed to: 1) utilize the required Personal Protective Equipment (PPE-can include items such as gowns, gloves, masks, goggles, face shields, and foot coverings) when performing wound care for Resident 13 who was on Enhanced Barrier Precautions; 2) complete hand hygiene (hand washing using soap and water or an alcohol based hand rub) and gloving when completing a blood glucose test for Resident 25 and then cleaning/disinfecting the glucose monitor in accordance with manufacturer's recommendations; 3) perform hand hygiene during the distribution of laundry for Residents 5, 8, 9, 12, 14, 15, 19, 25 and 26; and 4) implement measures to prevent the growth of Legionella (severe type of pneumonia/lung infection caused by bacteria which can be found in water) and/or waterborne pathogens in the facility. These practices had the potential to affect all facility residents. The total sample size was 19 and the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-04-15 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — widespreadEnsure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Licensure Reference 175 NAC 12-006.04B2a Based on interviews and record review; the facility failed to ensure 4 Nursing Assistants (NA) (NA-M, NA-N, NA-O, NA-P) had at least 12 hours of continuing education in 2023, including Dementia and infection control training of 5 staff reviewed. The facility identified a census of 34. The findings are: A record review of staff education records revealed the following: - NA-M had a total of 0.5 hours of continuing education for 2023 and did not have Dementia or infection control training - NA-N had a total of 4.25 hours of continuing education for 2023 and did not have Dementia training - NA-O had a total of 7.10 hours of continuing education for 2023 - NA-P had a total of 5.15 hours of 12 hours of continuing education for 2023 An interview on 4/8/2024 at 4:07 PM with the Administrator confirmed the staff did not have the required continuing education. A record review of a facility policy Staff Training, Retention of Records, Including CNA, Programing Policy and Procedure with an effective date of October 2022, revealed the facility will…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-15 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09D1c Based on observations, record review and interview; the facility failed to provide timely repositioning and feeding assistance for Residents 4, 15 and 27 and toileting assistance/incontinence management for Residents 4 and 15 who all required assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs). The sample size was 3 and the facility census was 34. Findings are: A. Review of Resident 4's Minimum Data Set (MDS-a federally mandated comprehensive assessment tool used for care planning) dated 2/16/24 revealed diagnoses of chronic pain, anemia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), anxiety, depression, and dementia. In addition, the resident required supervision and/or touching assistance with eating and drinking, and was dependent with oral and toileting hygiene, dressing, bed mobility, personal hygiene, and transfers. The resident was assessed as frequently incontinent of bowel and bladder. Review of Resident 4's current, undated Care Plan revealed the resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-04-15 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — patternProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.04C Based on observations, record review and interviews; the facility failed to ensure sufficient staff were available to provide Residents 3, 4 and 27 with timely feeding assistance, repositioning, and incontinence cares. The total sample size was 19 and the facility census was 34. Findings are: A. Review of Resident 4's Minimum Data Set (MDS-a federally mandated comprehensive assessment tool used for care planning) dated 2/16/24 revealed diagnoses of chronic pain, anemia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), anxiety, depression, and dementia. In addition, the resident required supervision and/or touching assistance with eating and drinking, and was dependent with oral and toileting hygiene, dressing, bed mobility, personal hygiene, and transfers. The resident was assessed as frequently incontinent of bowel and bladder. Review of Resident 4's current, undated Care Plan revealed the resident had limited physical mobility and limited ability to perform ADLs…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-15 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Licensure Reference 175 NAC 12-006.09D7 Based on observations, interviews, and record review; the facility failed to ensure call devices were within reach for 2 (Resident 14 and Resident 23) of 2 sampled residents. The facility identified a census of 34. The findings are: A record review of the facility policy Call Light Accessibility and Timely Response Policy and Procedure with a last revised date of March 2024 revealed staff will ensure the call light is within reach of residents and secured. A. A record review of Resident 14's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS, a standardized assessment tool that measures health status in nursing home residents), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 1/2/2024 revealed Resident 14 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 5/15, which indicated Resident 14 had severe cognitive impairment. The MDS also revealed Resident 14 required max assistance for toileting, hygiene, and dressing. A record review of Resident 14's Care Plan, initiated on 9/12/2023, revealed Resident 14 was at risk for falls related to diagnoses of Dementia and Parkinson's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-15 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09B. Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to accurately assess 1 (Resident 33) of 2 sampled resident's medication usage when completing their admission Minimum Data Set (MDS, a federally mandated comprehensive assessment tool utilized to develop resident care plans). The facility census was 34. The findings are: A record review of Resident 33's admission Record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, (a long-term condition in which the body has trouble controlling blood sugar and using it for energy). A record review of Resident 33's Physician's Orders revealed an order for the nurses to monitor the resident for adverse effects from insulin and oral hypoglycemic medications each shift. Resident 33 also had medication orders for glipizide 10 milligrams (mg) twice a day (BID) and metformin 500mg BID, as well as an order for Victoza 1.8mg to be injected once a day. All of these medications…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-15 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09C1c Based on record review and interview; the facility failed to revise 1 (Resident 23) of 12 sampled residents' care plan when the resident was treated for a urinary tract infection. The facility census was 34. The Findings Are: A record review of Resident 23's admission Record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a primary diagnosis of Unspecified Dementia, mild, with psychotic disturbance. A record review of a document scanned into Resident 23's electronic health record (EHR) titled Urine Dip Report and dated 3/26/24 revealed the resident's urine was red and hazy and that the resident had symptoms of blood in the urine and painful urination. A record review of a document scanned into Resident 23's EHR titled Urinalysis revealed a urinalysis, a physical, chemical, and microscopic examination of urine, was obtained on 3/26/24 and the culture of the urine was finalized on 3/31/24. A record review of Resident 23's Physician's Orders revealed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-15 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09D2b Based on observations, record review, and interviews; the facility failed to implement interventions per the facility's policy and the resident's care plan for 1 (Resident 3) of 3 sampled residents to promoting the healing of their pressure ulcer. The facility census was 34. The findings are: A record review of Resident 3's admission Record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of complete paraplegia, which is an Injury between spinal nerves T1 and T6 that causes the hips and legs to be paralyzed and have no feeling at all. This also causes loss of bladder and bowel control. The resident had a primary diagnosis added on 9/22/2021 of a stage 4 pressure ulcer of contiguous site of back, buttock and hip. A record review of a facility provided policy Prevention of Pressure Ulcers Policy with revision date of March 2019 revealed in General Guidelines, #1. Pressure ulcers are usually formed when a resident remains in the same…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-15 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and record review; the facility failed to ensure Medication Regimen Reviews had been reviewed by the physician and a rationale was provided when no action was taken for 1 (Resident 14) of 5 sampled residents. The facility identified a census of 34. The findings are: A record review of an admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident 14 on 1/17/2020 with diagnoses of Dementia, Parkinson's disease, delusional disorder, Major Depressive Disorder, anxiety, heart failure, and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. A record review of a Consultation Report with a date of 9/24/2023 revealed the Pharmacist had conducted a comprehensive medication review, but the facility had no documentation that the physician had also completed the monthly review for Resident 14. A record review of a Consultation Report with a date of 11/15/2023 revealed the Pharmacist had concerns regarding Resident 14's citalopram and risperidone. The facility had no documentation that they physician had reviewed or responded to the concerns. An interview on 4/10/2024 at 9:30 AM with the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-15 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12.006019D Based on record review and interview; the facility failed to ensure that PRN (as needed) orders for psychotropic (any drug capable of affecting the mind, emotions, and behavior) drugs were limited to 14 days or had a stop date or duration documented by the prescriber. In addition, the facility did not have a supporting diagnosis for use of the PRN antipsychotic for 1 (Resident 88) of 5 sampled residents. The facility census was 34. Findings are: A. Review of the facility Antipsychotic Use Policy and Procedure with a revision date of 11/22 revealed the following procedure was to be followed to ensure antipsychotic medications were only used as necessary to treat specific conditions: -prior to requesting medications for the purpose o mood, behavior, or sleep concerns the Interdisciplinary Team was to review non-medical alternatives which had been attempted and to attempt to establish root cause of behaviors. -if alternatives were attempted without success, the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-05-15 for 15 days
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to LANTIS ENTERPRISES — 5 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1 of 5 | 1.6 | -0.6 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 2.2 | -0.2 vs chain |
| Staffing | 1 of 5 | 2.8 | -1.8 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 1 of 5 | 1.6 | -0.6 vs chain |
The other 4 homes this chain runs (chain average 1.6★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| KISMET HD LLC | Organization | DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 09/01/2018 |
| KISMET HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 09/01/2018 |
| LANTIS, CAMMY | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; ADP OF THE SNF | since 09/01/2018 |
| LANTIS, MARY | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 09/01/2018 |
| LANTIS, TRAVIS | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 09/01/2018 |
| RINARD, SANDRA | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY | since 09/01/2018 |
| SOULEK, WENDY | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 09/01/2018 |
| LANTIS ENTERPRISES INC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 09/01/2018 |
| BOS, CHAD | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 09/01/2018 |
| WONG, CHRISTOPHER | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 11/15/2025 |
| MOORE, MICHAEL | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | since 09/01/2018 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 22 rows in the source record cover these 11 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $561K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 15% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in NE
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Nebraska Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 285091. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-05-21, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.