Cedar Ridge Village

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

56.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 164 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 65.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 52 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.27 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 40% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 17% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 40 beds and averages 38.8 residents a day — about 97% occupied, or roughly 1 bed typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.13 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.31 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.53 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.50 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.38 on weekdays — 20% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 1.48 to 0.90 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 56% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

20 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 10 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · D2025-08-12 · tag F0582 — isolated
  Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on clinical record review, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide the required beneficiary notifications to residents upon discharge for 1 of 3 residents sampled (Resident #50). The facility reported a census of 38. Findings include: The discharge Minimum Data Set (MDS) for Resident #50, completed 06/05/2025, documented the resident entered the facility on 05/20/2025 and discharged from the facility on 06/05/2025. An email from the Social Services coordinator, received on 08/05/2025 at 03:36 PM, contained the Beneficiary Notifications for two residents as requested by the surveyor, but did not contain the Beneficiary Notifications for Resident #50. In an interview on 08/05/2025 at 03:37 PM with the Social Services Coordinator, she stated she had been hired by the facility in June of 2025. When she was hired she was asked to begin auditing the work of her predecessor and discovered that for some residents, the Advanced Beneficiary Notification (ABN) and Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC), had not been provided to residents discharging…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-12 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
  Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interviews, and policy review the facility failed to ensure staff documented non-pharmacological interventions attempted prior to the administration of anti-anxiety medication (AA) for one of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications (Resident #35). The facility reported a census of 38 residents. Findings Include: The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #35 admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnosis of anxiety disorder. The MDS revealed the resident took an antianxiety (AA) medication during the seven day look-back period. The MDS recorded the resident had no behaviors. The Care Plan revised 4/23/25 lacked information related to Resident #35 taking an AA medication and the non-pharmacological interventions used or attempted prior to administration of the AA medication. The Order Summary revealed clonazepam (an AA medication) 0.5 milligrams (mg) by mouth every 8 hours as needed (PRN) started on 6/27/25. The…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-12 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure that a comprehensive, person-centered care plan that includes measurable objectives and timetables to meet the resident's physical, psychosocial and functional needs is developed and implemented for 2 of 5 residents investigated for unnecessary medications (Resident #21 and #35). The facility reported a census of 38.Findings include:1. The Care Plan initiated on 7/15/24 lacked documentation indicating Resident #21 was on an antidepressant and directives for staff related to monitoring side effects of medication. The Physician’s Orders indicated that Resident #21 was started on Lexapro 10 milligram (mg) daily for depression on 7/9/25. During an interview on 8/7/25 at 12:18 PM, Minimum Data Set (MDS) coordinator stated she has worked at this facility in the MDS role since 1/27/25. States she updates care plans whenever any medication changes or assistive level of care changes, and with admission or discharges. Stated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-12 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, observations, resident interview, staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure staff appropriately completed a resident assessment and provide timely intervention for one resident with Lower Extremity Edema ([NAME]) for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for edema (Resident #21) and 1 of 4 residents sampled for skin conditions (Resident #1). The facility reported a census of 38.Findings include:1. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed that Resident #21 had diagnoses of coronary artery disease, hypertension, heart failure, localized edema and acute respiratory failure with hypoxia. The Care Plan initiated on 7/15/24 lacked documentation of [NAME] hose use for [NAME]. The Electronic Health Record (EHR) indicated that Resident #21 is having significant weight gain and [NAME] despite elevation and compression hose. It further indicated that Resident #21 is wearing [NAME] hose daily from 6/30/25 through 7/28/25 despite being discontinued on 6/30/25. The…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-12 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on direct observation, clinical record review, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to follow care planned interventions to prevent and mitigate falls for 1 of 3 residents sampled (Resident #6). The facility reported a census of 38. Findings include: The Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS) for Resident #6, dated 07/21/2025, documented the residents Brief Interview for Mental Status score (BIMS) as 9, indicating moderately impaired cognition. It documented the following relevant diagnoses: Atrial Fibrillation (A fib), Cerebrovascular Accident (Stroke), displaced fracture of the neck of the right femur (broken femur), and senile degeneration of the brain (lost of cognitive ability due to age). It further documented her as dependent on staff for mobility and documented her as unable to walk. The significant change MDS, dated [DATE], documented the resident as ambulatory and only requiring supervision while ambulating. The Care Plan for Resident #6, last revised on 07/15/2025,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-12 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, observation, staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure safe and accurate delivery of oxygen therapy for one of two residents reviewed for respiratory care (Resident #21). The facility reported a census of 38 residents. Findings include:1. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed that Resident #21 had diagnoses of coronary artery disease, hypertension, heart failure, localized edema and acute respiratory failure with hypoxia. The Care Plan initiated on 7/15/24 indicated that Resident #21 has altered cardiovascular status, difficulty breathing and altered respiratory status requiring oxygen at 2-3 liters via nasal cannula (NC) to keep oxygen saturation greater than 88%. The Physician's Orders included an order oxygen continuous at 2-3 liters via NC to keep oxygen saturation greater than 88%. Observations revealed the following:a. On 8/4/25 at 3:11 PM Resident #21 had her oxygen concentrator set at 1 1/2 liters via NC. b. On 8/5/25 at 9:09 AM…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-12 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, observations, staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to utilize enhanced barrier precautions (EBP's) and infection control practices for 1 of 4 residents sampled on EBP's (Resident #34). The facility also failed to ensure staff followed infection control practices to protect against cross-contamination and potential spread of infection for a resident on droplet precautions for 1 of 4 residents on droplet/contact precautions (Resident #4). The facility reported a census of 38 residents. Findings include: 1.The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #34 had a diagnosis of obstructive uropathy. The MDS indicated the resident had an indwelling catheter. The Care Plan revised 6/30/25 revealed the resident had a catheter due to urinary retention. The Care Plan directed staff to use EBP’s per facility guidelines. During observation on 8/6/25 at 1:50 PM, Staff E, certified nursing assistant (CNA) stood in the bathroom as Resident #34 sat on the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-01 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, staff interview and policy review, the facility failed to ensure open items were dated, covered and labeled. The facility further failed to ensure potentially hazardous food items were stored separately; thawing meat was stored above other food items in the refrigerator. The facility reported a census of 40 residents. Findings include: Observation 7/29/24 at 11:10 AM in the main kitchen with the Dietary Manager (DM) present revealed the following: a. Open undated bag of approximately 25 pounds of planko crumbs b. Open undated bag of approximately 25 pounds of sugar c. Two opened undated boxes of approximately 24 ounces of pancake mix d. Open undated package of hard taco shells e. Open undated package of soft taco shells f. A tray of frozen meat on a middle shelf in the walk in refrigerator thawing, with pie placed under the shelf During an interview 7/29/24 at 11:20 AM, the DM stated an expectation that dry food be stored in sealed containers and open food sealed, labeled and dated. The DM further acknowledged thawing meat should have been placed separately…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-08-01 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolated
  Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview and facility policy review, the facility's Dietary Staff failed to perform the proper functions of food and nutrition services for the pureed food process for 3 of 3 residents requiring a pureed diet. The facility reported a census of 40 residents. Findings include: During an observation on 7/31/24 at 11:00 AM, Staff A, Cook, began the process to puree chicken fried steak by placing four pieces of chicken fried steak into the robot coupe, adding an unmeasured amount of beef broth three times during the pureeing. Staff A placed the pureed meat into a metal container, unmeasured. Staff A stated the green scoop would be used to serve residents for the amount. Staff A acknowledged uncertainty as to how it was determined the green scoop was used to measure the amount to serve residents. Staff A advised not being trained on the puree process. Staff A then began the process to puree corn, placing an unmeasured amount of corn into the robot coupe and added thickener to the robot…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-12-11 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, policy review, and staff interview, the facility failed to serve food under sanitary conditions by touching the prepared food with their bare hands and the eating surface of the plates during meal service. The facility reported a census of 31 residents. Findings include: 1. Observation on 12/5/23 starting at 9:02 AM, Staff I, Certified Nurse Aide, assisted a resident to eat. She picked up the resident's strip of bacon with her bare hand and gave the resident a bite of the bacon. Then with the same bare hand touched her mask, the table surface, and then proceeded to touch another resident's strip of bacon to provide that resident a bite. 2. During continuous observation on 12/6/23, starting at 12:12 PM - 12:42 PM, Staff J, Dietary Aide, without completing hand hygiene, she started the service of the lunch meal. During the service, Staff J used her bare hands, repeatedly touching the eating surface of several residents' plates with her thumb, touched her face mask, and touched the eating service of the plates. In addition, as Staff J leaned over to scoop food,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to PIVOTAL HEALTH CARE — 9 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 30 rows in the source record cover these 18 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

9 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $319K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IA