Linden Woods Village

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

60.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 124 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 55.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 59 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.49 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 80% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 29% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 40 beds and averages 38.5 residents a day — about 96% occupied, or roughly 2 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.00 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.98 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.50 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.54 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.19 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.17 to 0.50 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 61% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

17 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 7 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-05-07 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff stored food in a sanitary manner and failed to ensure the kitchen was clean and in good repair. The facility census was 32. Review of the facility policy titled, Food Storage Policy, dated October 2018, showed:-Foods shall be stored in a manner that complies with safe food handling practices;-Staff will maintain clean food storage areas at all times;-Food in dry storage will be kept off the floor;-All foods stored in the refrigerator or the freezer will covered, labeled and dated with a use by date;-Open container must be dated and sealed.The facility did not provide a policy for cleaning and repair of the kitchen.Observation on 05/04/2026 at 08:20 A.M., showed:-Microwave with dirt and food debris inside on the roof and vents;-Floor by the dishwasher area was dirty and the grout looks black, gravel like and is pealing off;-The oven on the right side of the stove broken.-One opened 1/2 gallon of 2% milk, 2/3 full, will no open date;-One open 1/2 gallon of whipping cream, 1/2 full with no open…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-05-07 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to provide a clean and home like environment when the facility did not ensure vents in the hallways and the vents outside resident rooms were clean and free of debris, the ceiling in the dining room was clean and in good repair and when the facility failed to ensure the handrail by the dining room was clean. This had the potential to affect all residents who had the right live in a clean environment that was free from dirt, dust and in good repair. The facility census was 32. The facility did not provide the requested policy on clean and home like environment.Observation on 05/04/2026 at 08:35 A.M., showed: -The vent on the ceiling outside the public bathroom near the dining area covered in dust, dirt and debris;-The vent on the other side of the dining room next to the therapy room covered in dirt, dust and debris;-The handrail across the hall from the public bathroom near the serving station with a black scuff mark approximately 1 inch wide, that ran the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-05-07 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure dependent residents who were unable to carry out activities of daily living (ADLs) received the necessary services to maintain good personal hygiene when staff did not provide proper peri-care for three of 12 sampled residents (Resident #6, #11, and #30). The facility census was 32.Review of the facility training and competency, titled, Combined Perineal Care Female and Male, undated, showed:- Once a gloved hand has touched something soiled (old depends, garbage can, used trash bags, etc), it cannot be used to touch something clean without removing gloves and performing hand hygiene;- Having a second clean person can assist with this procedure;- Do not place soiled items on the clean surface or bed;- One wipe, one swipe: no scrubbing or re-using wipes or cloths;- Always wipe away from the peri-area. Do not wipe towards as this can bring bacteria/soilage into the peri-area. Review of the facility training and competency, titled,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-05-07 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — pattern
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a residents received the appropriate care and services to prevent urinary tract infections to the extent possible and when the facility staff failed to ensure proper urinary catheter care was performed for one resident (Resident #6), and additionally when the facility failed to collect a physician ordered urine sample for eight days causing delay in start of treatment for one resident (Resident #30) of the 12 sampled. The facility census was 32. Review of the facility training and competency titled, Combined Catheter Care, undated, showed:- Once care is completed, ensure tubing is strapped to inner thigh;- One wipe, one swipe: no scrubbing or re-using wipes or cloths;- Spread the personal folds with non-dominant hand, with clean cloth/wipe clean the catheter at point of insertion into urethra using a pen roll to cleanse the entire circumference of the catheter;- Hold catheter in place as dominant hand cleanses the extension of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-07 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — pattern
  Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the medication error rate was less than five percent with an error rate of 24% out of 29 opportunities, when the staff crushed medications for administration that were not supposed to be crushed, additionally when the facility staff failed to administer medication with sufficient water and with, or after food as ordered by the physician. This affected one of 12 sampled residents (Resident #16). The facility census was 32. Review of the facility undated policy titled, Medication Administration Competency: General Guideline, showed staff were supposed to compare the order in the Medication Administration Record (MAR) three times prior to medication administration. Review of the facility undated policy titled, Medication Administration Competency: Oral Medications, showed: -Refer to and follow instructions if medication has additional recommended administration directions (e.g. give with food, with 120 milliliters (mLs) of water); -Crush medications only after ensuring the medication is NOT on the Do Not…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-07 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure proper storage and labeling of medications and biologicals when the facility had an open bottle of lorazepam (an anti-anxiety medication) with no open date for one resident (Resident #8) and three open bottles of stock medications used for multiple residents with no open date. Additionally, when the facility had three opened bottles of glucose control solution (solutions used for daily calibration/testing of bedside blood glucose machines) with no open date. This had the potential to affect all residents with orders for these medications. The facility census was 32.The facility did not provide a policy regarding storage and labeling of medications and biologicals. Review of the facilities undated Healthcare Professional Operator's Manual for the Medline Evencare ProView Blood Glucose Monitoring System (the blood glucose monitoring machine and products used by facility), showed: -Always check the expiration date of the control…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-05-07 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program when the facility staff did not wear proper Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) when providing high contact cares for one resident (Resident #3), when the facility staff did not change gloves and perform hand hygiene between dirty and clean tasks (Resident #11) and additionally when the staff failed to sanitize vital sign equipment (blood pressure cuff, thermometer, etc.) between uses on residents (Resident #3 and #11). This affected two of 12 sampled residents. The facility census was 32.Review of the facility policy titled, Enhanced Barrier Precaution (EBP), dated 3/2024, showed:-EBP refers to an infection control intervention designed to reduce transmission of multidrug-resistant organisms (MDRO) that employs targeted gown and glove use during high contact resident care activities;-EBP was indicated for a resident with an indwelling device (instrument inserted into the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-07 · tag F0645 — isolated
  PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure an assessment of the Level I preadmission screening resident review (PASARR) assessment (used to identify individuals with mental illness or intellectual/developmental disabilities completed before admission to the nursing facility) was completed before admission for one resident (Resident #6). The affected one of 12 sampled residents. The facility census was 32.The facility did not provide a PASARR policy. 1. Review of Resident #6's Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS) a federally required assessment tool completed by facility staff, dated 03/27/26, showed:- Cognition was not intact;- Was dependent on staff for completing activities of daily living;- Diagnoses of Quadriplegia (paralysis affecting all four limbs), encephalopathy (brain disease that leads to altered mental status), schizophrenia, and psychotic disorder. Review of the resident's care plan, revised 03/31/26, showed:-He/She had the special instruction that stated Resident is on palliative services. Please do not use the term Hospice in front of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-07 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide care and services that meet professional standards when the facility failed to properly document pain and urinary continence status on weekly assessments for one of 12 sampled residents (Resident #30). The facility census was 32.Review of Resident #30's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment completed by facility staff, dated 04/08/26, showed:-No cognitive impairment;-Reported frequent pain;-Always incontinent of urine;-Dependent on nursing staff for all hygiene cares, toileting and transfers;-Diagnoses included: Heart failure, high blood pressure and chronic pain. Review of the care plan dated 03/25/26, showed:-Resident had chronic pain to arm, legs, and back due to osteoarthritis;-Staff to monitor and record pain characteristics every four hours while awake including quality (sharp, burning), severity (pain score 1-10), anatomical location, onset, duration and aggravating or relieving factors. Review of the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) showed:- Weekly Long-Term Care…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-01-02 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure the sanitizer used to sanitize food contact surfaces was at a level effective to sanitize the surfaces and failed to ensure food stored in the walk-in refrigerator and the refrigerator on the unit was labeled and discarded after the use-by date and/or expiration date for 38 census residents residing in and receiving food from the dietary department. This had the potential to result in food borne illness and cross contamination. The facility census was 37. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Food Receiving and Storage with a revised date of October 2018, revealed all food must be labeled with a use by date. The policy did not reveal how long they could keep open or leftover food. Review of the facility's policy titled, Food Brought into Resident's from Outside Sources with a revised date of 11/06/17, revealed once food has been opened it will be discarded within seven days and foods would be thrown out based on the use by or best by date marked on the container. 1.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to PIVOTAL HEALTH CARE — 9 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 31 rows in the source record cover these 21 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

12 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $301K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MO