Westchester Village Of Lenexa
8505 Pflumm Road, Lenexa, KS 66215 · For profit - Corporation · 34 certified beds · (913) 307-2000 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home’s record is mixed — some reassuring signs, some worth asking about.
- a strong health-inspection score (4/5) — the hardest rating to game (though it’s ranked within its own state, not nationally)
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
- a high number of inspection citations overall (22) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)
- nursing-staff turnover (58%) runs well above the national median (45%)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 4 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 4 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 2 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 2 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 1 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 3 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 4 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 22.6% | 17.9% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 6.3% | 4.9% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 1.6% | 1.6% | 0.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 7.0% | 2.9% | 2.0% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 1.4% | 6.5% | 6.5% | better |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 8.0% | 4.3% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 30.3% | 16.2% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 9.2% | 23.2% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 84.0% | 95.5% | 95.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 6.0% | 4.4% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 34.4% | 22.6% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 1.9% | 18.1% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 1.0% | 1.9% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 82.6% | 73.8% | 79.4% | typical |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 25.0% | 22.4% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 7.8% | 11.5% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.76 | 1.80 | 1.67 | typical |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 2.46 | 2.13 | 1.80 | worse |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
46.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 73 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 34.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 49 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.48 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 79% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 44% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 46.8%CMS range 37.7–58.2 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 11.2%CMS range 6.8–15.8 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 34.7% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 32.6% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 36.7% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 89.1% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 93.3% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 6.6%CMS range 3.6–9.9 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.00 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 34 beds and averages 30.6 residents a day — about 90% occupied, or roughly 3 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 5.11 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.22 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.35 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.80 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.24 on weekdays — 8% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.32 to 0.98 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 58% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
22 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 12 are one tap away and print in full.
- Potential for harm · F2025-03-19 · tag F0942 — widespreadEnsure that staff members are educated on resident rights and facility responsibilities to properly care for its residents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility identified a census of 26 residents. Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure agency staff received the required resident rights training. This placed the residents at risk for impaired care and decreased quality of life. Findings included: - On 03/19/25 at 08:40 AM a review of the training provided by the facility for agency Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) N, CNA O, CNA P, and Certified Medication Aide (CMA) R revealed the following: The facility was unable to provide documentation of CNA N had completed on resident rights training. The facility was unable to provide documentation of CNA O had completed on resident rights training. The facility was unable to provide documentation of CNA P had completed on resident rights training. The facility was unable to provide documentation of CMA R had completed on resident rights training. On 03/19/25 at 10:11 AM, Administrative Staff A stated the facility would start having the charge nurse ensure the agency staff had the required education before working at the facility. The facility failed to provide a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-19 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 26 residents. The sample included 12 residents with one resident reviewed for dignity. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R) 19 was appropriately clothed when his bare thigh and leg were showing, and his door was left open. This deficient practice placed R19 at risk for impaired dignity and decreased psychosocial well-being. Findings included: - R19's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) from the Diagnosis tab documented diagnoses of cognitive communication deficient (an impairment in organization, sequencing, attention, memory, planning, problem-solving, and safety awareness), difficulty in walking, hypertension (high blood pressure), transient ischemic attack (TIA - temporary episode of inadequate blood supply to the brain), malnutrition (not enough calories), cerebral infarction (stroke - sudden death of brain cells due to lack of oxygen caused by impaired blood flow to the brain by blockage or rupture of an artery to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-19 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 26 residents. The sample included 12 residents. Based on record review, interview, and observation, the facility failed to ensure the physician was notified of Resident (R) 2's daily weights that were missed or notified related to weight gain which could lead to fluid overload. The facility further failed to notify R15's physician related to his blood sugar monitoring. This deficient practice placed the residents at risk for further decline and a delay in treatment. - R2's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) from the Diagnosis tab documented diagnoses of diabetes mellitus (DM - when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin is made, or the body cannot respond to the insulin), congestive heart failure (CHF - a condition with low heart output and the body becomes congested with fluid), dementia (a progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory and confusion), and anxiety (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty, and irrational…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-19 · tag F0625 — isolatedNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 26 residents. The sample included 12 residents, with one resident sampled for discharge. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide a bed hold with the required information to Resident (R) 7 or to their family representative when R7 was transferred to the hospital. This deficient practice placed R7 at risk for impaired ability to return to the facility or his same room. Finding include: - The electronic medical record (EMR) documented diagnoses of malnutrition (not enough calories to maintain), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD - a progressive and irreversible condition characterized by diminished lung capacity and difficulty or discomfort in breathing), hypertension (high blood pressure), depression (a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest), congestive heart failure (CHF - a condition with low heart output and the body becomes congested with fluid), over active bladder, edema (swelling…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-19 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility identified a census of 26 residents. The sample included 12 residents, with two residents reviewed for treatment and services to prevent and heal pressure ulcers (localized injury to the skin and/or underlying tissue usually over a bony prominence, because of pressure, or pressure in combination with shear and/or friction). Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R) 9's heels were offloading while in bed to prevent pressure ulcers. This placed R9 at increased risk for pressure ulcer development. Findings Included: - R9's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) from the Diagnosis tab documented diagnoses of mood disorder (category of mental health problems, feelings of sadness, helplessness, guilt, and wanting to die were more intense and persistent than what may normally be felt from time to time), cerebral infarction (stroke - sudden death of brain cells due to lack of oxygen caused by impaired blood flow to the brain by blockage or rupture of an artery to the brain), chronic pain, overactive bladder, major depressive…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-19 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 26 residents. The sample included 12 residents, with one resident observed for bowel and bladder. Based on observation, record reviews, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R) 14's catheter (a flexible tube inserted through a narrow opening into a body cavity, particularly the bladder, for removing fluid) tubing did not drag on the floor. This deficient practice placed R14 at risk of complications and possible urinary tract infections due to potential urine backflow. Finding included: - R14's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) from the Diagnosis tab documented diagnoses of hydroureter (a condition where the ureter, the tube that carries urine from the kidney to the bladder, becomes dilated (enlarged) due to a blockage in the urinary tract), diabetes mellitus (DM - when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin is made, or the body cannot respond to the insulin), hypertension (high blood pressure), retention of urine, need for assistance with persona care,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-19 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 26 residents. The sample included 12 residents, with five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure dosing instructions for as needed Voltaren (topical pain reliever medication) gel and failed to follow a physician order for daily weights to monitor for fluid overload for Resident (R) 2. The facility also failed to follow a physician order for blood sugar monitoring for R15. The facility further failed to ensure R6's anticoagulant (a class of medications sued to prevent the blood from clotting) medication was administered as ordered. These deficient practices placed the residents at risk of unnecessary medication use, side effects, physical complications, and fluid overload. Findings included: - R2's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) from the Diagnosis tab documented diagnoses of diabetes mellitus (DM - when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin is made, or the body cannot respond…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-19 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility identified a census of 26 residents. The sample included 12 residents, with five reviewed for immunization status. Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to administer Pneumococcal Conjugate Vaccine (PCV20 - vaccination for bacterial pneumonia infections) vaccination after obtaining a signed consent for Resident (R) 4. This placed the residents at increased risk for complications related to pneumonia. Findings included: - Review of R4's clinical record lacked documentation the PCV20 was given, after obtaining a signed consent or a physician documented contraindication. On 03/18/25 at 08:33 AM, Administrative Nurse E stated the facility had begun putting the consent for vaccinations in the admission packet. He stated the charge nurse would get the consent and order the medication. On 3/19/25 at 11:33 AM, Administrative Nurse D stated the facility was ensuring all immunizations were offered and given, by putting the consent and declination in the admission packet. Administrative Nurse D stated it was ultimately the charge nurse's responsibility to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-07-12 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — patternProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 35. The sample included 12 residents. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide activities on the weekends which reflected the residents' interests, and preferences. This placed the residents at risk for boredom, isolation, and decreased quality of life. Findings included: - Review of the facility's activity calendars for April 2023 and May 2023 revealed each Saturday had activities of snacks and chat, and family visits except for 04/08/23 when an Easter egg hunt and a musical Yakety [NAME] Quartet was provided. The activity calendar for April, May, and June 2023 revealed no activities scheduled on any Sunday except afternoon church services. On 07/11/23 at 03:37 PM, in a confidential interview with the resident council, several residents reported that though the weekday activities were ongoing and fun, the facility did not provide any activities on Sundays. The council reported the facility had church on Sundays, but the rest of the day had no…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-07-12 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility identified a census of 35. The sample included 12 with 12 reviewed for comprehensive care plans. Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan related to preventative wound care for Resident (R)22. This deficient practice placed him at risk for complication related to skin injuries and pressure ulcers due to uncommunicated care needs. Findings Included: - The Medical Diagnosis section within R22's Electronic Medical Records (EMR) included diagnoses of dementia (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion), major depressive disorder (major mood disorder), restlessness, agitation, reduced mobility, and benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH-non-cancerous enlargement of the prostate which can lead to interference with urine flow, urinary frequency, and urinary tract infections). R22's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) completed 06/03/23 noted a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of nine indicating moderate cognitive impairment. The MDS indicated he required extensive assistance…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 12 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-12 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility identified a census of 35 residents. The sample included 12 residents with three reviewed for non-pressure related skin conditions. Based on observations, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to implement interventions to identify, treat, and prevent Resident (R)4's traumatic skin injuries. These deficient practices placed R4 at risk for complications related to skin injuries and infections. Findings included: - The Medical Diagnosis section within R4's Electronic Medical Records (EMR) included diagnoses of dementia (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion), muscle weakness, dysphagia (swallowing difficulty), myocardial infarction (heart attack), and unsteadiness on feet. R4's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) completed 06/03/23 noted a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of nine indicating moderate cognitive impairment. The MDS indicated she required extensive assistance from one staff for all activities of daily living (ADLs). The MDS indicated she had one non-injury fall. The MDS noted she weighed 109 pounds…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-12 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility identified a census of 35 residents. The sample included 12 residents. Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to ensure adequate interventions were in place to address hazards on Resident (R)4's wheelchair and failed to to provide safety provisions, including use of gait belt and foot pedals, for R4. The deficient practice placed R4 at risk for accidents and injuries. Findings included: - The Medical Diagnosis section within R4's Electronic Medical Records (EMR) included diagnoses of dementia (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion), muscle weakness, dysphagia (swallowing difficulty), myocardial infarction (heart attack), and unsteadiness on feet. A review of R4's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) completed 06/03/23 noted a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of nine indicating moderate cognitive impairment. The MDS indicated she required extensive assistance from one staff for all activities of daily living (ADLs). The MDS indicated she had one non-injury fall. The MDS noted she weighed 109 pounds…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-07-12 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility identified a census of 35 residents. The sample included 12 residents with three reviewed for nutrition. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R)6 was weighed weekly per his physician's orders. This deficient practice placed R6 at risk for complications related to unintended weight loss. Findings included: - The Medical Diagnosis section within R6's Electronic Medical Records (EMR) included diagnoses of insomnia (inability to sleep), edema (swelling resulting from an excessive accumulation of fluid in the body tissues), cellulitis (skin infection caused by bacteria characterized by heat, redness and swelling), major depressive disorder (major mood disorder), dementia (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion), dysphagia (swallowing difficulty), muscle weakness, and neuropathy (pain caused by nerve damage). R6's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) completed 04/01/23 noted a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) assessment could not be competed due to severe impaired cognition. The MDS…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-07-12 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility identified a census of 35 residents. The sample included 12 residents with five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the physician indicated an appropriate indication, or a documented physician rationale which included the multiple unsuccessful attempts for nonpharmacological symptom management and risk versus benefits, for the use of an antipsychotic medication (class of medications used to treat psychosis and other mental emotional conditions) for Resident (R) 22, who had a diagnosis of dementia (a progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion). This placed R22 at risk for administration of unnecessary psychotropic (alters mood or thought) medications and adverse side effects. Findings Included: - The Medical Diagnosis section within R22's Electronic Medical Records (EMR) included diagnoses of dementia,, major depressive disorder (major mood disorder), restlessness (the inability to relax), agitation (feeling of aggravation or restlessness brought on by…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-12 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility identified a census of 35 residents. The sample included 16 residents which five residents reviewed for immunizations. Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to obtain pneumococcal (pneumonia infection that inflames air sacs in one or both lungs which may fill with fluid) vaccination consents, declinations, or administration information for Residents (R) 7 and R22. This deficient practice placed residents at increased risk for pneumonia and related complications. Findings included - Review of the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) for R7 and R22 revealed the clinical record lacked documentation indicating that the residents had been offered, consented, refused, or had received the pneumonia vaccination. The facility was unable to provide a consent, declination, or record of administration of pneumonia vaccination for R7 and R22. On 07/12/23 at 03:32 PM Administrative Nurse E stated at the time of admission residents were asked about their immunization status and that information was documented under the Immunization tab in the clinical record.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-12-30 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility had a census of 28 residents. The sample included 12 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interviews the facility failed to promote care in a manner to maintain and enhance dignity and respect, when staff obtained Resident (R) 23's blood pressure and R7's oxygen saturation at the dining room table, and administered a topical cream to R7's neck at the dining room table, with multiple residents in full view. This created the risk for impaired dignity and psychosocial wellbeing for R23 and R7. Findings included: - On 12/27/21 at 11:27 AM, observation revealed Licensed Nurse (LN) G obtained R23's blood pressure at the dining room table, while eating her meal, with five residents at the same table. On 12/29/21 at 11:38 AM, observation revealed Certified Medication Aide (CMA) R obtained R23's blood pressure at the dining room table, with five residents at the same table. On 12/30/21 at 08:48 AM, observation revealed LN H obtained R7's oxygen saturation and administered a topical cream to R7's neck, with four residents at the same table. On 12/30/21 at 08:20 AM,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-12-30 · tag F0661 — isolatedEnsure necessary information is communicated to the resident, and receiving health care provider at the time of a planned discharge.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 28 residents. The sample included 12 residents with one resident reviewed for discharge. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete a discharge summary for Resident (R)32 that included a recapitulation (a concise summary of the resident's stay and course of treatment in the facility) summary of the resident's stay in the facility. This placed R32 at risk for miscommunication or interruptions in the continuum of care after. Findings included: - R32's medical record revealed the resident admitted to facility on 08/20/21. The admission Minimum Data Set, (MDS), dated [DATE], documented R32 had moderately impaired cognition and required extensive assistance of two staff for bed mobility, transfers, toileting, personal hygiene, and extensive assistance of one staff for locomotion on and off the unit and dressing. The MDS documented ambulation did not occur during the look back period and R32 expected to be discharged to independent living. The Discharge Care…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-12-30 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 28 residents. The sample included 12 residents with one reviewed for positioning and mobility. Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to recognize and provide the necessary cares and services to ensure appropriate wheelchair and bed positioning for Resident (R) 10 which placed R10 at increased risk for increased pain and decreased function. Findings included: - R10's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) listed diagnoses of hemiplegia (paralysis of one side of the body) and hemiparesis (muscular weakness of one half of the body) following cerebral infarction (a brain lesion in which a cluster of brain cells die when they don't get enough blood) affecting left non dominant side, and muscle weakness. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented R10 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, which indicated intact cognition. The MDS documented R10 required total staff assistance with toileting, extensive staff assistance with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-12-30 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 28 residents. The sample included 12 residents, with four reviewed for accidents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to follow Resident (R)7's toileting and fall interventions as directed in the plan of care. This placed R7 at increased risk for injuries related to accidents and/or hazards. Findings included: - The Electronic Medical Record (EMR) for R7 recorded diagnoses of overactive bladder (sudden need to urinate), and anxiety (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty and irrational fear). R7's admission Minimum Data Set(MDS) dated [DATE], documented R7 had moderately impaired cognition and required extensive assistance of one staff for bed mobility, transfers, and toileting. R7 had unsteady balance, no functional impairment, frequently incontinent of bladder, and had one non injury fall. The Quarterly MDS, dated 10/02/21, documented the resident had intact cognition and required extensive assistance of one staff…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-12-30 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 28 residents. The sample included 12 residents, with five reviewed for unnecessary medications. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility's Consultant Pharmacist (CP) failed to identify and report multiple episodes of blood pressures outside of physician ordered parameter for Resident (R)8. This placed R8 at risk for physical decline and complications related to low blood pressure. Findings included: - R8's Physician Order Sheet (POS), dated 11/22/21, documented diagnoses of chronic diastolic heart failure (occurs when your left ventricle can no longer relax between heartbeats because the tissues have become still and won't fill up with blood before the next heart beat), coronary artery disease (damage or disease in the hearts major blood vessels), pulmonary hypertension (high blood pressure), and atrial fibrillation (rapid, irregular heart beat). The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented R8 had intact cognition and required extensive…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-12-30 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 28 residents. The sample included 12 residents, with five reviewed for unnecessary medications. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to notify the physician of out of parameter blood pressures for Resident (R)8. This placed R8 at risk for physical decline and complications related to low blood pressure. Findings included: - R8's Physician Order Sheet (POS), dated 11/22/21, documented diagnoses of chronic diastolic heart failure (occurs when your left ventricle can no longer relax between heartbeats because the tissues have become still and won't fill up with blood before the next heart beat), coronary artery disease (damage or disease in the hearts major blood vessels), pulmonary hypertension (high blood pressure), and atrial fibrillation (rapid, irregular heart beat). The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented R8 had intact cognition and required extensive assistance of two staff for bed mobility, toileting, and extensive…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-12-30 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility had a census of 28 residents. The sample included 12 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to ensure staff performed appropriate hand hygiene and/or glove usage during perineal care (involves washing the genital and rectal areas of the body or perineal area) for Resident (R) 10. This deficient practice placed R10 at risk for cross-contamination and increased risk for infection. Findings included: - On 12/29/21 at 09:32 AM, observation revealed Licensed Nurse (LN) J and Certified nurse Aid (CNA) N entered R10's room and explained to the resident they were going to provide incontinent cares. Both staff applied gloves. LN J removed R10's wet incontinent brief, removed and discarded gloves, and applied new gloves. Observation revealed CNA N provided perineal care to R 10's front perineal area, then with the same soiled gloves, assisted LN J in applying a new incontinent brief. CNA N then touched R10's bed remote, shirt back, bed pad, and rolled up wash cloth in the resident's left hand contracture (abnormal permanent fixation of a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to PIVOTAL HEALTH CARE — 9 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 4 of 5 | 3.9 | +0.1 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 4 of 5 | 3.4 | +0.6 vs chain |
| Staffing | 4 of 5 | 4.4 | -0.4 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 2 of 5 | 4.0 | -2.0 vs chain |
The other 8 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.9★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| SCENIC DEVELOPMENT LLC | Organization | DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 12/16/2017 |
| SCENIC HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 12/31/2019 |
| 3RK, LLC | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 01/01/2021 |
| 5 R CATTLE, LLC | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 12/16/2017 |
| CADET INVESTMENT LLC | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 12/16/2017 |
| LMRAY, LLC | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 12/16/2017 |
| POKY - 5R LLC | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 12/31/2019 |
| POKY FEEDERS INC | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 12/16/2017 |
| WSG LLC | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 12/16/2017 |
| ANDERSON, JORDAN | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 01/01/2025 |
| ANDERSON, MARLENE | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 12/16/2017 |
| ANDERSON, WAYNE | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 12/16/2017 |
| GULLEDGE, SCOTT | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 12/16/2017 |
| GULLEDGE, TRAVIS | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/01/2025 |
| HOWARD, STEVEN | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 12/16/2017 |
| WOOD, GILBERT | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 12/16/2017 |
| PIVOTAL HEALTH CARE LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 04/28/2025 |
| FRANS, CLAYTON | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 05/02/2026 |
| MARTIN, CAROLINE | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 02/06/2023 |
| CURANA HEALTH OF MISSOURI-KANSAS LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 03/01/2023 |
| SUMMIT CARE, LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 12/16/2017 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 31 rows in the source record cover these 21 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
12 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $208K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in KS
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Kansas Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 175536. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-03-19, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.