Colonial Village

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

48.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 100 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 56.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 41 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.30 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 47% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 9% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 40 beds and averages 34.8 residents a day — about 87% occupied, or roughly 5 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.43 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.00 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.83 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.02 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.59 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.08 to 0.81 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 63% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

28 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 17 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2024-10-31 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
  Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 36 residents. The sample included 13 residents with one reviewed for nutrition. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to provide nutritional interventions to prevent Resident (R)25's identified and continued slow weight loss. As a result of the deficient practice, R25 had a significant unplanned weight loss of 13.06 percent (%) within three months. This also placed R25 at risk for malnourishment related complications. Findings Included: - The Medical Diagnosis section within R25's Electronic Medical Records (EMR) included diagnoses of insomnia (difficulty sleeping), progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP- a rare neurodegenerative disorder characterized by progressive deterioration of the brain cells), dementia (a progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory and confusion), and dysphagia (difficulty swallowing). R25's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) completed 05/15/24 noted a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of six…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2024-10-31 · tag F0730 — widespread
  Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  The facility had a census of 36 residents. The sample included 13 residents. Five Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) were reviewed for yearly performance evaluations and in-service training. Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure one of the five reviewed CNA staff had the required yearly performance evaluations completed. This placed the residents at risk for inadequate care. Findings included: - A review of the facility's performance evaluation and in-service records revealed the following: CNA O, hired on 06/21/23, had no yearly performance evaluations. On 10/31/24 at 12:15 PM Administrative Nurse D stated the facility did not have the required yearly performance evaluations for CNA O. She stated yearly performance evaluations were completed annually for all CNA staff. The facility's Staff Requirement policy 06/2010 indicated performance reviews will be conducted on each employee at least annually to identify to identify employee strengths and goals. The policy noted the evaluation will be utilized to determine the training needs of the employee. The…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-10-31 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  The facility identified a census of 36 residents with one kitchen and two dining rooms with kitchenettes. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to follow sanitary dietary standards related to the storage of food. This deficient practice placed the residents at risk related to food-borne illnesses. Findings Included: - On 10/29/24 an inspection of the facility's kitchen was completed. An inspection of the walk-in refrigerator unit revealed an open but undated half-gallon carton of milk and a carton of heavy whipping cream. An inspection of the back hall kitchenette revealed an unlabeled plate of spinach and beef sandwich and an undated bag with dessert pastries. An inspection of the main dining kitchenette drink station revealed an open and undated bottle of whipping cream. The refrigerator contained an eight-fluid-ounce container of Arginaid (wound care supplemental drink) with an expiration date of June 2024. On 10/31/24 at 09:30 AM Dietary Staff BB stated all opened food products should be labeled and dated. She stated staff should not be placing…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-31 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  The facility identified a census of 36 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure proper infection control standards were followed related to hand hygiene and disinfecting shared equipment between each resident. These deficient practices placed the residents at risk for complications related to infectious diseases. Findings included: - Observation on 10/29/24 at 09:15 AM Resident (R)36 sat in her wheelchair. Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) M and CNA N donned their gowns and gloves. CNA M placed the mechanical sit-to-stand lift in front of R36. CNA M then placed R36's catheter bag onto the side of the knee brace on the mechanical lift. Using the lift, staff transferred R36 onto the toilet. CNA N removed R36's pants and incontinent brief. CNA N provided peri-care to R36's rectal area. CNA N removed her gloves, and without performing hand hygiene, donned another pair of gloves. CNA M provided peri-care around R36's catheter. CNA M wiped several swipes with one cleansing wipe around the catheter tubing and peri-area. Wearing the same soiled…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-10-31 · tag F0623 — isolated
  Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 36 residents. The sample included 13 residents with one resident reviewed for hospitalization. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide written notification of transfer to Resident (R)32 and/or their representative, with a written notice specifying the location and reason for R32's facility-initiated transfer. This deficient practice placed R32 at risk for miscommunication between the facility and resident/representative and possible missed opportunities for healthcare services. Findings included: - The Medical Diagnosis section within R32's Electronic Medical Records (EMR) included diagnoses of dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), cognitive-communication disorder, dementia (a progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory and confusion), and acute kidney failure. R32's Discharge Minimum Data Set (MDS) completed 10/04/24 indicated she was discharged with an anticipated return to the facility. The MDS indicated she was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-10-31 · tag F0625 — isolated
  Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 36 residents. The sample included 13 residents with one resident reviewed for hospitalization. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a copy of the bed hold policy to Resident (R)32 and/or their representative, when R32 was transferred to the hospital. This deficient practice placed R32 at risk for impaired right to return to the facility to the same room. Findings included: - The Medical Diagnosis section within R32's Electronic Medical Records (EMR) included diagnoses of dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), cognitive-communication disorder, dementia (a progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory and confusion), and acute kidney failure. R32's Discharge Minimum Data Set (MDS) completed 10/04/24 indicated she was discharged with an anticipated return to the facility. The MDS indicated she was discharged to a short-term hospital. R32's Entry MDS completed on 10/06/24 indicated she returned to the facility from an acute…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-10-31 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 36 residents. The sample included 13 residents with three reviewed for pressure ulcers (localized injury to the skin and/or underlying tissue usually over a bony prominence, because of pressure, or pressure in combination with shear and/or friction). Based on interviews, observations, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R)7 and R16's pressure-reducing interventions were implemented correctly when their low air-loss mattress pumps were set at an inappropriate weight for each resident. This deficient practice placed all affected residents at risk for complications related to skin breakdown and pressure ulcers. Findings included: - The Medical Diagnosis section within R7's Electronic Medical Records (EMR) noted diagnoses of cognitive communication deficit, muscle weakness, insomnia (difficulty sleeping), and Alzheimer's disease (progressive mental deterioration characterized by confusion and memory failure). R7's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-31 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 36 residents. The sample included 13 residents with two residents reviewed for catheter (a flexible tube inserted through a narrow opening into a body cavity, particularly the bladder, for removing fluid) care. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R) 36 had a physician-ordered indication for an indwelling catheter and failed to provide adequate catheter care within the standards of care. This deficient practice placed R36 at risk of catheter-related complications and urinary tract infections (UTI). Findings included: - R36's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) from the Diagnoses tab documented diagnoses of muscle weakness, need for assistance with personal care, and hypertension (HTN-elevated blood pressure). The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14 which indicated intact cognition. The MDS documented R36 had an indwelling catheter during the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-31 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
  Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  The facility identified a census of 36 residents. The sample included 13 residents with five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that as-needed (PRN) psychotropic (alters mood or thought) medication had a 14-day stop date or a specified duration with supporting physician documentation for Resident (R) 90's PRN psychotropic medications. This placed R90 at risk for unnecessary medication administration and possible adverse side effects. Findings included: - R90's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) from the Diagnoses tab documented diagnoses of muscle weakness, need for assistance with personal care, anxiety (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty, and irrational fear) disorder, and dementia (a progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory and confusion). The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) was in progress not completed. R90's Care Area Assessment (CAA) was in progress and not completed. R90's Baseline Care Plan dated 10/26/24 documented that…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-10-31 · tag F0849 — isolated
  Arrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 36 residents. The sample included 13 residents with one resident reviewed for hospice services. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure collaboration between the nursing home and hospice services to identify hospice-supplied services, supplies, medication, and equipment for Resident (R)7. This deficient practice placed R7 at risk for delayed services and uncommunicated care needs. Findings included: - The Medical Diagnosis section within R7's Electronic Medical Records (EMR) noted diagnoses of cognitive communication deficit, muscle weakness, insomnia (difficulty sleeping), and Alzheimer's disease (progressive mental deterioration characterized by confusion and memory failure). R7's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of five indicating severe cognitive impairment. The MDS indicated both upper and lower extremity impairment on both sides. The MDS indicated she was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-06-08 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 30. The sample included 12 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to secure the main dining room kitchenette. This deficient practice placed five cognitively impaired independently mobile residents at risk for potential hazards or preventable accidents. The facility additionally failed to ensure Resident (R)22's Dycem (thin, rubber-like material that helps prevent sliding) was in her chair, as directed by the care plan, to prevent falls. This deficient practice placed R22 at risk for increased falls and injury. Findings Included: -On 06/07/23 at 09:37PM an inspection of the kitchenette after breakfast service revealed no doors to secure kitchenette or potentially hazardous equipment. The kitchenette was left unsecured and unsupervised. An inspection of the counter revealed a coffee pot left on top of a double pot warmer. The heater element still on and the glass coffee pot still warm. The kitchenette contained a functioning oven,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to PIVOTAL HEALTH CARE — 9 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 31 rows in the source record cover these 21 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

12 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $241K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in KS