La Bella Of Edwardsville
6277 Center Grove Road, Edwardsville, IL 62025 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 120 certified beds · (618) 659-0605 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Apr 2025
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
- inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (41) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $138,662 in federal fines (most recent 2026-07-29)
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
- nursing-staff turnover (72%) runs well above the national median (45%)
- its last standard health inspection was over 2 years ago — the star rating may not reflect current conditions
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 1 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 2 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 12.9% | 13.4% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 3.4% | 6.3% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.9% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.3% | 1.5% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 99.4% | 54.2% | 6.5% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.5% | 0.1% | 0.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 2.3% | 3.1% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 12.7% | 14.3% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 29.9% | 18.3% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 74.7% | 91.8% | 95.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 3.6% | 4.8% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 19.4% | 20.6% | 21.2% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 3.7% | 21.7% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 1.2% | 2.2% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 4.0% | 63.1% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 30.7% | 26.1% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 14.6% | 13.9% | 12.0% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 0.95 | 2.02 | 1.67 | better |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 2.49 | 2.22 | 1.80 | worse |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
47.3% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 65 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 53.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 77 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.41 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 71% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 7% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 47.3%CMS range 33.5–61.9 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 15.4%CMS range 11.0–19.7 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | worse than U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 53.2% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 62.3% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 44.2% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 98.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 96.4% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.8% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 1.5% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 7.2%CMS range 3.7–12.3 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.01 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 106.2 residents a day — about 88% occupied, or roughly 14 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.91 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.21 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.66 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.52 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.07 on weekdays — 18% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.23 to 0.15 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 72% is well above the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
41 citations, most serious first. The 18 most serious are shown; the remaining 23 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · J2024-05-21 · tag F0678 — failed to provide CPR when needed — isolatedProvide basic life support, including CPR, prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel , subject to physician orders and the resident’s advance directives.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and Record Review the facility failed to perform cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) for 1 of 1 resident (R7) reviewed for CPR in the sample of 48. This failure resulted in R7 not receiving life saving measures according to her Advanced Directives. The Immediate Jeopardy began on [DATE] when R7 did not received CPR. V1, Adminstrator and V2, Director of Nursing were notified of the Immediate Jeopardy on 05//16/24 at 3:14 PM. The surveyor confirmed by interview and record review that the Immediate Jeopardy was removed, and the deficient practice corrected on [DATE]. Findings Include: R7 's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documents R7 has moderately impaired cognitive skills for daily decision making. R7s Care Plan dated [DATE] documents (R7) Advanced Directives on record Uniform POLST form (R7) goal is If R7 heart stops, or if they stop breathing, CPR WILL be initiated in honor with their FULL code wishes ongoing through next review date. R7's POLST (Uniform Practitioner Order for Life…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-11-06 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to assess and implement appropriate fall intervention for 1 of 3 (R3) residents reviewed for falls in a sample list of 28. This failure resulted in R3 experiencing an unwitnessed fall, sustaining a laceration to his forehead requiring 8 sutures by local hospital.Findings includeR3's Care Plan, dated 10/22/2025, documents that R3 at risk for falls. The resident has impaired cognition and impaired safety awareness. The resident has balance or walking impairments. The resident has a history of falls., The resident has FUNCTIONAL IMPAIRMENTS OF THE LOWER EXTREMITIES which causes safety issues with transfers and/or walking. Interventions anticipate and meet resident's needs. Be sure the resident's call light is within reach and encourage the resident to use it for assistance as needed. Fall RISK evaluation. Frequent monitoring of resident to ensure safe positioning and needs are met. Keep bed in lowest position acceptable by the resident when the resident is…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-11-21 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from abuse for 1 of 3 residents (R2) reviewed for abuse in the sample of 3. This failure resulted in (R2) sustaining multiple bruises to her face requiring to be evaluated in the emergency room at the local hospital. This past non-compliance occurred on 10/31/2024 through 11/19/2024. R3's Face Sheet dated 11/4/2024, documents she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease, anxiety, schizophrenia, depression and dementia. R3's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], documents she is cognitively impaired with inattention and disorganized thinking. No indicators of psychosis. Behavioral symptoms not directed toward others. R3's Care Plan, dated 10/31/2024 documents focus: resident at risk for abuse, abusing others demonstrates behaviors that have potential to disturb others. 10/31/2024 altercation with another resident in which (R3) was the perpetrator. Goal: resident will be free from abuse…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-07-09 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide timely and complete incontinence care for 1 of 3 (R4) residents reviewed for improper nursing care. This failure resulted in R4 feeling sad, and unsafe in the facility and experiencing pain to buttocks during incontinent care and obtaining open areas. Findings include: R4's Care Plan, dated 4/30/21, documents (R4) has bowel incontinence cognitive status. It continues, Provide pericare after each incontinent episode, Check resident Q (every) 2-3 hrs (hours) and PRN (as needed) for incontinent episodes. It also documents 4/27/24 (R4) has urinary incontinence. It continues, Provide incontinent/peri-care PRN, Check every 2-3 hours and/or as required for incontinence. Provide incontinent care as needed. R4's Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE], documents that R4 is cognitively intact, occasionally incontinent of urine and always incontinent of bowel. It also documents that R4 is dependent on staff for toileting. R4's Progress note, dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-02-01 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure safe transfers for 1 of 3 residents (R2) reviewed for transfers, in the sample of 12. This failure resulted in R2 being transferred incorrectly and resulted in severe bruising on her body covering her right shoulder from the back and underneath side and her entire chest which resulted in her being hospitalized . Findings include: R2's Physician Order Sheet (POS), dated January 2024, documented diagnoses of Atherosclerotic heart disease, hyperlipidemia, hypertension, abnormal finding of lung field, osteoarthritis, diverticulosis, disorder of thyroid, dysphagia, abnormal levels of serum enzymes, complete intestinal obstruction, acute kidney failure, and personal history of (healed) traumatic fracture. R2's POS also documented that she was taking 81 milligrams (mg) of aspirin once a day. R2's Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented that R2 was severely impaired for cognition. It also documented that they needed assist for sit…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2023-02-24 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident was treated with dignity, and had needs met timely for 4 of 4 residents (R35, R51, R54, R77) observed for dignity in a sample of 43. This failure resulted in R77 feeling dirty, nasty and embarrassed. Findings include: 1. R77's Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documents that R77 is cognitively intact. On 2/22/2023 at 9:10 AM, R77's wheelchair was heavily soiled with visible caked on food on the foot pedals, cushion, and both sides of the wheelchair. On 2/22/2023 at 8:59 AM, R77 stated that his wheelchair is dirty. R77 stated that he has not had his wheelchair cleaned since being here. R77 stated that he was pissed off and felt embarrassed. R77 stated that he doesn't have any legs and his wheelchair is how he moves round. R77 stated that he feels dirty and nasty. This is what you see when you see me. They don't do nothing. Who wants to be seen like this? This is embarrassing. On 2/22/23 at 9:05 AM, V13, Certified Nurse…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2022-03-25 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation and record review, the facility failed to ensure fall interventions were in place for 1 of 2 residents (R11) reviewed for falls in the sample of 49. This failure resulted in R11 falling and sustaining a subdural hematoma requiring hospitalization. Findings include: R11's Face Sheet, undated, documents R11 has a diagnosis of Muscle Weakness and a History of Falls. R11's Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documents R11 has moderate cognitive impairment, requires an extensive assist of one staff with transfers and has impaired balance. R11's Care Plan, dated 5/18/21, documents R11 is at risk for falls due to impaired cognition and impaired safety awareness with the following interventions implemented on the following dates: 6/30/21, Will provide with sitter while awake; and 7/21/21, self-releasing seat belt. On 3/22/22 at 1:43PM, V8, R11's Family, stated R11 had a fall about 3 to 4 weeks ago, went to the emergency room, had a brain bleed and urinary tract infection. V8 stated R11…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2022-03-25 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide incontinent and catheter care in a manner to prevent Urinary Tract Infections (UTI) and discomfort for 5 of 6 residents (R18, R25, R29, R41 and R71) reviewed for Urinary Tract Infections in the sample of 49. This failure resulted in R18, R25, and R71 requiring hospitalizations for treatment of their Urinary Tract Infections. Findings include: 1. On 3/22/22 at 9:36 AM, V7 Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) came in to provide incontinent care after R18 was incontinent of stool. R18 has an indwelling urinary catheter and when V7 pulled R18's jeans off she pulled on R18's catheter which was not secured with a leg strap. R18 cried out when V7 pulled on her catheter when removing jeans. The urine in R18's catheter bag was murky brown. V7 donned gloves without performing hand hygiene, and using disposable wipes, wiped visible fecal material from R18's buttocks and rectum. V7's gloves were visibly soiled, and she changed gloves without…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-30 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure newly identified pressure wounds were assessed and failed to follow physician orders for administration of treatments to pressure wounds for two (R3 and R7) of four residents reviewed for pressure wounds in the sample list of 10.1.R3's undated Care Plan documents R3's diagnoses include Severe Protein-Calorie Malnutrition, Pressure Ulcer to Right Heel, Open Wound to Right Foot, Muscle Weakness, and Parkinson's Disease. This Care Plan further documents an admission date of 03/15/2025. R3's Care plan dated 12/04/2025 documents a Focus to Document Pressure Ulcer with interventions to evaluate skin for areas of blanching or redness, evaluate ulcer characteristics, monitor bony prominences for redness, and provide wound care per treatment orders. R3's Care plan dated 5/20/2026 documents R3 has decreased mobility with functional limitation in range of motion to bilateral upper extremity (BUE)/ bilateral lower extremity (BLE) related to: Parkinson's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-22 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the Facility failed to ensure steam table holding temperatures were in safe range, to prevent the growth of harmful pathogens for ensuring the safety and quality of the food served to residents for 8 of 13 residents (R2, R3, R7, R8, R10, R11, R12 and R13) reviewed for food temperatures in the sample of 15. Findings include: On 1/17/2026 at 12:02 PM, the steam table was cool to the touch as the food was being placed on the steam table. On 1/17/2026 at 12;05 PM, the chili, the alternate menu item was placed on the steam table by V5, Food Service Worker but no food temperature as taken. On 1/17/2026 at 12:30 PM, the chili did not have any steam coming from it. On 1/7/2026 at 12:42 PM, the Temperature Logbook was on the middle cabinet close to the stove. There were no temperatures documented for the lunch menu on 1/17/2026. On 1/17/2026 at 12:55 PM, during the lunch service after the last resident had been served food temperatures were taken with a calibrated metal thermometer and the pureed vegetables were 121.4 F (Fahrenheit), the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-11-06 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure housekeeping services were provided to maintain a clean and sanitary environment for 9 of 14 (R3, R8, R16, R17, R18, R19, R20, R21, R22, R23) residents reviewed for housekeeping on the sample list of 23.Findings include:The Resident Council Meeting Minutes, dated 9/10/2025, documents that New News Housekeeping/Laundry: Resident have concerns about shower rooms not being mopped.The Resident Council Meeting Minutes, dated 10/15/2025, documents that New News Housekeeping/Laundry: Resident have concern about floors being dirty/sticky.On 10/27/2025 from 9:05 AM to 9:18 AM a tour was performed on 100 hall and 200 hall revealed:1. room [ROOM NUMBER], R16's and R22's room, had large torn pieces of incontinent briefs, food green beans and potatoes, and empty diet Coke bottle on floor. The floor was sticky when waking on it.2. room [ROOM NUMBER], R19's and R23's room, large torn pieces of incontinent briefs, soiled undergarments in trash can,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-24 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide showers twice a week to 2 of 4 residents (R1 and R8) reviewed for bathing in the sample of 11. Findings include: 1. R1's Bath and Skin Report sheet dated April 2025 documents bath or shower preference to be done AM on Monday and Thursday. R1's bath and skin report does not document a shower being given from 4/14/2025- 4/23/2025. R1's Face Sheet dated 4/23/2025 documents in part a diagnosis of Quadriplegia, Dysphagia, Speech and Language Deficits following Cardiovascular Disease. R1's Care Plan dated 7/9/2022 documents R1 has an Activity Daily Living (ADL) self-care performance deficit related to Cerebrovascular Accident (CVA), Weakness. R1's care plan documents interventions R1 currently requires assistance for bathing total 2. R1's Care plan documents R1 has bowel incontinence related to immobility. R1's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] document unable to do Brief interview for Mental status due to R1's cognitive impairment. 2. R8's Bath and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-24 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to change dressing and provide skin care daily to Gastrostomy (G ) tube for 1 of 3 residents (R2) reviewed for enteral feeding tubes in the sample of 11. Findings include: 1. On 4/22/2025 at 9:03 AM R2's Gastrostomy (G) tube dressing in place with date of 4/18/2025 as verified by V3, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN). R2's Care plan dated 3/21/2025 documents R2 requires tube feeding related to oropharyngial dysphagia after Cerebrovascular Accident (CVA). R2's care plan documents intervention; provide skin care to insertion site daily and as needed (PRN). R2's Physician Order (PO) dated 4/22/2025 documents G-tube site care - cleanse site and apply dry split gauze dressing every night after 12 AM. On 4/22/2025 at 9:03 AM V3, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) stated R2's gtube is to be cleaned and dressing changed daily. The facility policy Gastrostomy/Jejunostomy Site Care dated revised April 2025 documents the purpose of the procedure is to promote cleanliness and to protect the gastrostomy or Jejunostomy irritation,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-10 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to prevent verbal abuse for 1 of 3 residents (R6) reviewed for abuse in the sample of 9. Findings include: R6's (Electronic Medical Records (EMR) undated documents that resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R6's EMR dated 4/4/25 documents R6 has diagnoses of spinal stenosis, lumbar region without neurogenic claudication; chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; major depressive disorder; anxiety disorder; chronic diastolic congestive heart failure; and chronic kidney disease, stage 3B. R6's medical record and Care Plan did not document a care plan for abuse. R6's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documents a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 14 out of 15. The MDS documents that the resident requires substantial/maximal assistance with sit to lying. The MDS documents that the resident requires partial/moderate assistance with lying to sitting on side of bed. On 4/9/25 at 1:13 PM, R5 stated that a staff member has been yelling at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-09 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to initiate its abuse policy and report and investigate injuries of unknown origin for 1 of 3 (R3) residents reviewed for abuse. Findings include: R3's Care Plan, dated [DATE], documents that (R3) has an alteration in hematological status r/t (related to) Anticoagulant side effects, anemia, history of GI bleed. It continues, Report to the physician any S/S (signs/symptoms) abnormal bleeding or hemorrhage. If resident falls must be sent to emergency room due to anticoagulant use: Monitor for signs/symptoms of bleeding, bruising, active bleed, pain and swelling. It also documents [DATE] (R3) is at risk for abnormal bleeding r/t use of anticoagulant therapy for management of embolism and thrombosis of right popliteal vein. It continues, Monitor for and report to nurse any of the following s/s bleeding: Bleeding gums, Nose bleeds, unusual bruising, Tarry, black stools, Pink or discolored urine. Report to the physician any S/S abnormal bleeding or hemorrhage.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-09 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to initiate its abuse policy and report injuries of unknown origin for 1 of 3 (R3) residents reviewed for abuse. Findings include: R3's Care Plan, dated [DATE], documents that (R3) has an alteration in hematological status r/t (related to) Anticoagulant side effects, anemia, history of GI bleed It continues Report to the physician any S/S (signs/symptoms) abnormal bleeding or hemorrhage. If resident falls must be sent to emergency room due to anticoagulant use: Monitor for signs/symptoms of bleeding, bruising, active bleed, pain and swelling. It also documents [DATE] (R3) is at risk for abnormal bleeding r/t use of anticoagulant therapy for management of embolism and thrombosis of right popliteal vein. It continues Monitor for and report to nurse any of the following s/s bleeding: Bleeding gums, Nose bleeds, unusual bruising, Tarry, black stools, Pink or discolored urine. Report to the physician any S/S abnormal bleeding or hemorrhage. R3's Minimum Data…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-09 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to initiate its abuse policy and investigate injuries of unknown origin for 1 of 3 (R3) residents reviewed for abuse. Findings include: R3's Care Plan, dated [DATE], documents that (R3) has an alteration in hematological status r/t (related to) Anticoagulant side effects, anemia, history of GI bleed. It continues, Report to the physician any S/S (signs/symptoms) abnormal bleeding or hemorrhage. If resident falls must be sent to emergency room due to anticoagulant use: Monitor for signs/symptoms of bleeding, bruising, active bleed, pain and swelling. It also documents [DATE] (R3) is at risk for abnormal bleeding r/t use of anticoagulant therapy for management of embolism and thrombosis of right popliteal vein. It continues Monitor for and report to nurse any of the following s/s bleeding: Bleeding gums, Nose bleeds, unusual bruising, Tarry, black stools, Pink or discolored urine. Report to the physician any S/S abnormal bleeding or hemorrhage. R3's Minimum…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-05-21 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespreadHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the Facility failed to use the services of a Registered Nurse (RN) for at least eight hours daily. This has the potential to affect all 102 residents living in the Facility. Findings Include: The Facility's Staffing List for RN (Registered Nurse), LPN (Licensed Practical Nurse), and CNA (Certified Nurse Aid) hours scheduled was provided from 4/30/24 through 5/13/24. These document the Facility did not have a RN for eight hours on 5/4/24, 5/7/24, 5/8/24, or 5/12/24. On 5/21/24 at 7:20 AM, V1, Administrator, stated she did not have RN coverage on all of those days. She stated the Facility does not have a policy regarding RN staffing, and they just follow the regulations. The Facility's Long-Term Care Facility Application For Medicare And Medicaid dated 5/14/24 documents there are 102 residents living in the Facility.
Show the remaining 23 citations
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-05-21 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the Facility failed to ensure food was stored, prepared, and served in a manner that prevents potential contamination. This has the potential to affect all 102 residents living in the Facility. Findings include: On 5/14/24 at 9:44 AM, there were plastic containers of dry corn cereal and dry rice cereal on the food preparation counter that were not dated or labeled. There was a plastic container of a brown granular substance that was not labeled or dated. On the same counter next to the microwave, there was a stack of plates with dried crusted food particles on top. On 5/14/24 at 9:46 AM, there was a large industrial sized food bin labeled flour under the food preparation counter across from the oven that was not dated. On 5/14/24 at 9:48 AM, in the walk in refrigerator there was a stainless steel container with slices of meat that was not covered, labeled or dated. V5, Dietary Manager, stated, That is pork, and it's going with me (to be thrown out). There was a box of dinner rolls that had been opened, and the plastic inside was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-21 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on Interview and Record Review, the facility failed to respond to resident needs in a timely manner, by not responding to call lights, and call light not in working order for 2 of 2 residents (R41, R46) in the sample of 48. Findings Include: R41's Facesheet documents an admission date of 12/19/2023. Diagnosis include Polyneuropathy, Chronic Respiratory Failure with hypoxia, Chronic Obstructive Respiratory Disease, Generalized Muscle Weakness. R41's Minimum Data Set, MDS, dated [DATE] documents R41 has no cognitive deficits. R41's MDS dated [DATE] documents R41 requires partial/moderate assist with showering. R41's Care Plan dated 12/19/2023 documents R41 is at risk for falls. Interventions include anticipate and meet R41's needs. Be sure the resident's call light is within reach and encourage the resident to use it for assistance as needed. Check the environment for clutter or trip hazards and area is well lit. Remind to request assistance when getting up if needed. Call Don't Fall sign placed in R41's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-21 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to offer Pneumonia vaccinations for 1 of 5 residents (R42) reviewed for Immunizations in the sample of 48 Findings Include: R42's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documents R42 is severly impaired for cognitive skills for daily decision making. R42's Electronic Health Record (EHR) Influenza vaccine was given on 10/19/23 and COVID vaccine was given on 12/18/23. R42's EHR did not document a Pneumonia Vaccine. On 5/17/24 V4 Infection Control Preventionist (ICP) stated, They haven't had an IP in a while. I'm focusing on the TB (Tuberculosis) tests, But I will start on vaccinations, I have only been here a month. The facility policy Vaccination of Residents dated October 2019 documents all residents will be offered vaccines that aide in preventing infectious diseases. Unless the vaccine is medically contraindicated or the resident has already been vaccinated
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-05 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to obtain a treatment order and have treatments and interventions in place as ordered by the physician to treat pressure ulcers for 2 of 3 residents (R3 and R4) observed for pressure ulcers in the sample of 7. Findings include: 1. On 3/29/24 at 12:50 PM, R3 was lying in bed on a low air loss mattress. The mattress was not on and there were no lights lit up on controls and no alarm sounding. R3's mattress was still firm and inflated. R3 was lying on his back with the head of his bed up. His tube feeding was infusing per a pump. V7, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) came into R3's room to check on R3 and was asked about the mattress not being on . She checked the plug and stated it was unplugged and plugged it back in. V7 stated she was surprised it was not alarming since it was unplugged. She stated she was not sure when someone had last been in to see R3. V7 did roll R3 to his left side and a dressing was observed loosely covering his stage 4…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-07 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure care plan interventions were appropriately in place for 2 out of 4 residents (R2, R7) reviewed for accidents in a sample of 18. Findings include: 1. R2's admission Record, dated 3/5/24, documented that R2 was admitted on [DATE]. R2's admission record documented that R2's diagnoses are fracture of T11-T12 vertebra, type 2 diabetes mellitus with diabetic nephropathy, narcolepsy, hypertensive heart disease with heart failure, venous insufficiency, obstructive and reflux uropathy, depression, anemia, chronic kidney disease, obstructive sleep apnea, neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder, essential hypertension, hypothyroidism, mixed hyperlipidemia, benign prostatic hyperplasia and gastro-esophageal reflux disease. R2's MDS (Minimum Data Set), dated 2/1/24 documented that R2 is severely cognitively impaired and is dependent on staff for all ADLS (activities of daily living). R2's Care Plan, dated 11/9/23, documented that R2 requires a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-17 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — patternHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to maintain resident rights and dignity by providing timely care as needed, including answering call lights, for 5 of 10 residents (R1, R3, R5, R9, R10) reviewed for resident rights and dignity in the sample of 10. The findings include: 1. R1's Face Sheet, undated, documents R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnosis of Malignant Neoplasm of connective and soft tissue, Lymphedema, Obesity, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (DM), Neuralgia and Neuritis, Deep Vein Thrombosis (DVT's), Hypothyroidism, Hyperlipidemia, Pulmonary nodule, and Hypertension (HTN). R1's Care Plan, dated 1/5/24, documents R1 has an Activities of Daily Living (ADL) self-care performance deficit. Interventions: Mechanical Lift for transfers, ADL Care: the resident may need assistance x 1 or x 2 for ADL care. This may fluctuate with weakness, fatigue, and weight bearing status, Transfer: the resident is limited to extensive and may need assistance x 1 or x 2 for transfers in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-18 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the Facility failed to notify family/resident representative of significant physical change resulting in hospital transfer for 2 of 3 residents (R2, R3) reviewed for notifications in the sample of 4. Findings include: 1. R2's Face Sheet documents R2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including acute respiratory failure, atrial fibrillation, type 2 diabetes mellitus, Alzheimer's disease, and multiple compression fractures of vertebra. R2's Progress Note by V20, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) on 12/1/23 at 12:34 AM documents, At 2300 (11:00 PM) pt (patient) was transported to (Local Hospital) via (Ambulance) service. Pt displays pitting edema on both hands which has cause(d) rings to become stuck on pts finger causing pain 5/10. Pt requested to go to hospital to have rings removed. (V18), NP (Nurse Practitioner) notified. On 12/15/23 at 9:36 AM, V6, R2's Power of Attorney (POA), stated the Facility did not tell him R2 was going to the hospital for her…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-18 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the Facility failed to provide the necessary ADL's Activities of Daily Living (ADL's) for 2 of 3 dependent residents (R1, R3) reviewed for bathing in the sample of 4. Findings include: 1.R1's Face Sheet documents R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including type 2 diabetes mellitus, hypertension, heart failure, protein calorie malnutrition, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, muscle weakness, and pain. R1's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented R1 was cognitively intact and required substantial/maximal assistance for showering/bathing. R1's Care Plan initiated 11/24/20 documents, (R1) has an ADL self-care performance deficit r/t (related to) Limited Mobility, Weakness, Limited ROM (Range of Motion) LOWER, ONE SIDE. The Care Plan was revised on 9/12/23 to include, (R1) currently requires assistance with ADLs: Bathing: total. R1's Bathing/Showers Report for the month of December 2023 does not document R1…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-18 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the Facility failed to monitor residents' vital signs to monitor overall physical/medical condition per physician orders for 2 of 3 residents (R1, R3) reviewed for quality of care in the sample of 4. Findings include: 1. R1's Face Sheet documents R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including type 2 diabetes mellitus, hypertension, heart failure, protein calorie malnutrition, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, muscle weakness, and pain. R1's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented R1 was cognitively intact and ambulated via wheelchair. R1's Care Plan initiated 4/14/21 documents R1 has an alteration in hematological status related to anticoagulant side effects including anemia and gastrointestinal bleed. The intervention included monitoring vital signs per Facility protocol and as ordered by physician. R1's Care Plan revision on 7/22/21 documents R1 has specific cardiac needs with interventions to including…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-14 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation and record review the facility failed to maintain a clean and sanitary environment for 1 (R7) of 16 residents sampled. Findings include: 1. R7's Face Sheet undated documents, R7's was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with pertinent diagnosis of Neuromuscular Dysfunction of Bladder, Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia, (BPH), without Lower Urinary Tract symptoms, Multiple Sclerosis, Morbid (Severe) Obesity due to Excess calories and Lymphedema, not elsewhere classified. R7's Minimum Data Set, (MDS), dated [DATE] documents, R7 is cognitively intact is occasionally incontinent of urine and always continent of bowel. R7 is not part of a toileting program. R7's Physician Order Summary Report undated documents, active orders for pertinent medication of Furosemide tablet 20 milligrams, (mg), once per day, Hydrochlorothiazide 25 mg once per day and Lisinopril 20 mg once per day. R7's Physician Order Summary Report undated documents, that R7 has an active order for neuromuscular re-education.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-14 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, observation and record review, the facility failed to operationalize their COVID-19 infection control policy and procedures to prevent and/or contain COVID-19, by not wearing appropriate Personal Protective Equipment, (PPE), when providing care to residents with COVID-19 or suspected COVID-19, not appropriately disinfecting shared medical equipment, and not performing adequate hand hygiene while caring for residents. Findings include: 1. On 11/3/23 at 10:00 AM, V1 Administrator stated that the facility has one resident (R3) that is on isolation precautions, due to testing positive for COVID-19. V1 Administrator stated, (R3) tested positive at the hospital and was admitted to the facility positive for COVID-19 on 10/31/23. The quarantine period was expected to end at 12:00 AM on 11/4/23. Anyone entering the resident room is to wear a disposable gown, gloves and N95 mask. This (PPE) is stored outside the resident's room and is readily accessible to all. On 11/3/23 at 10:15 AM, there was sign on (R3's) door documenting, (R3) is on Transmission-based Precautions. On…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2023-02-24 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — widespreadEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to properly label, store medication, and discard expired medications. This has the potential to affect all 95 residents living in the facility. Findings include: 1. On 2/21/2023 at 9:35 AM the 100-Hall medication cart was inspected. The medication cart contained the following: -1 open bottle of Brimonidine 2% eye drops with no open date. The Brimonidine eye drops manufacture recommendations, from website Patient patient.info/medicine/brimonidine-eye-drops-for-glaucoma-alphagan-brymont patient.info/medicine/brimonidine-eye-drops-for-glaucoma-alphagan-brymont, documents that the eye drops should be discarded 4 weeks after open even if there is liquid still in the bottle. The Recommendations documented that the eye drops can be used for four weeks once the bottle has been opened. The Recommendation documents even if there is still some solution remaining after this time, throw it away and use a new bottle as this will help to prevent the risk of eye infections. 2. On 2/21/2023 at 9:40 AM, the 100/200 Medication…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-02-24 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the Facility failed to ensure food was stored and prepared in a manner which prevents potential contamination and foodborne illnesses. This has the potential to affect all 95 residents living in the Facility. Findings include: 1. On 2/21/23 at 7:58 AM, the walk-in cooler contained a tray of condiment cups filled with ketchup that were covered with a sheet of wax paper and were not labeled or dated. There was a stainless-steel container covered with a sheet of wax paper labeled Carrots 2/14. The covering did not make a seal around the container. There was a plastic container of meatballs covered in plastic wrap that was not labeled or dated. There was a plastic tub covered with wax paper labeled Lettuce 2/19 which was not sealed. The lettuce inside the tub was brown around the edges. There were 4 trays of individual containers of mixed fruit on a rack that were not labeled or dated. The containers on the top rack were not covered with the fan above blowing directly on them. On the shelf bedside the cart, there were an additional 8…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-02-24 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation, and record review the facility failed to assess, monitor, and provide turning and repositioning for pressure ulcer prevention and treatment for 2 of 6 residents (R17, R85) reviewed for pressure ulcers in the sample of 43. Findings Include: 1. R17's Minimum Data Set (MDS) 1/26/23 documents R17 is at risk for pressure ulcers. R17's MDS also documents R17 requires extensive assist of two for bed mobility. R17's Physician Order Summary (POS) Report dated 1/25/23 documents apply house barrier cream to the buttocks/coccyx as needed for prevention each brief change and or incontinence episode. R17's POS dated 2/23/23 documents R17 has a diagnosis of Mixed Incontinence. R17's Pressure Ulcer Care plan dated 2/8/23 documents R17 is at risk for developing pressure ulcers with goal for R17 to have intact skin, and be free of redness, blisters, or discoloration over bony prominence through next review. On 2/23/23 at 10:30 AM, V2, Director of Nursing (DON), stated, The wound was found on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-02-24 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review and observation the facility failed to provide adequate services and range of motion to prevent further weakness for 2 of 3 residents (R30, R51) reviewed for range of motion in the sample of 43. Findings Include: 1. R30's Electronic Health Record Documents R30 has a diagnosis of Cerebral Infarction, Muscle Wasting and Atrophy, and Muscle Weakness. R30's Physician Order Sheet (POS) dated 2/3/22 documents cleanse left hand with soap and water, dry, apply rolled up towel to left hand related to contracture daily and whenever necessary. On 2/23/23 at 1:45 PM, R30 was able to open and close both right and left hands, and no contracture was noted to either hand. R30's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documents R30 has impairment to upper and lower extremities on one side. R30's MDS also documents R30 requires extensive assist of one person for transfer. It also documents that R30 received 0 passive and active range of motion for Restorative Nursing Programs. R30's Care Plan dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-02-24 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facilty failed to perform complete and thorough incontinent care for 2 of 5 residents (R19, R79) reviewed for incontinent care in the sample of 43. Findings include: 1. R19's Care Plan, dated 1/26/21, documents (R19) has urinary incontinence r/t (related to) Behaviors. It continues Check every 2-3 hours and/or as required for incontinence. Provide incontinent care as needed. Provide incontinent/peri-care PRN (as needed) R19's Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documents that R19 is cognitively intact, frequently incontinent of urine, always incontinent of bowel and requires extensive assist of 1 staff for toileting. On 02/21/23 at 8:05 AM V6, Certified Nurse's Assistant (CNA), assisted R19 with incontinent care. R19 was incontinent of urine. V6 folded R19's incontinent brief between her legs. Using a premoistened wipe, V6 wiped R19's groin and outer labia. V6 then assisted R19 onto her right side revealing a heavily urine soiled incontinent brief. V6 then…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-02-24 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — isolatedImplement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the Facility failed to establish an infection prevention and control program that reduces the risk of adverse events, including the development of antibiotic-resistant organisms, from unnecessary or inappropriate antibiotic use for 1of 5 residents (R70) reviewed for antibiotic stewardship in the sample of 43. Findings include: 1.The Facility's Infection Control Monthly Tracking Log for the Month of December 2022 does not document an organism causing R70's UTI (Urinary Tract Infection). The log documents R70 was treated with the antibiotic Cephalexin. R70's Order Summary Report printed 2/23/23 documents order for Cephalexin Capsule 500 mg (milligrams) - Give 500 mg by mouth every 8 hours for UTI until 12/29/2022 with start date of 12/24/22 and end date of 12/29/22. R70's February 2023 Medication Administration Record (MAR) documents R70 received 18 doses of Cephalexin. R70's Culture and Sensitivity (C&S) dated 12/25/22 does not document the organism Escherichia coli (ESBL) is sensitive to the antibiotic Cephalexin. On 2/24/23 at 9:58 AM, V1,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-03-25 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — patternProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation and record review, the facility failed to date and store oxygen supplies/equipment appropriately in 4 of 4 residents (R14, R25, R60 and R71) reviewed for oxygen/respiratory therapy in the sample of 49. Findings include: 1. On 3/22/22 at 10:40 AM, R14 was observed with oxygen on at 2 liters/minute. The nebulizer tubing was lying out on the bedside table uncovered. The oxygen tubing nor the nebulizer tubing was dated. R14's Face Sheet, undated, documents R14 has a diagnosis of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD). R14's Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documents R14 receives oxygen therapy. R14's Care Plan, dated 8/13/21, documents R14 has an altered respiratory status. R14's Physician Order Sheet (POS) documents the following order: 10/4/21 - change oxygen tubing weekly and as needed every 7 days. There were no orders on the POS to change or how often to change the nebulizer tubing. 2. On 3/22/22 at 9:50 AM, R60 was observed with oxygen on at 2 liters, the oxygen…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-03-25 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to perform hand hygiene, glove changes and maintain adequate infection control practices to prevent cross contamination while providing incontinent care, catheter care and wound treatments for 6 of 16 residents ((R18, R25, R29, R41, R71 and R275) reviewed for infection control in the sample of 49. Findings include: 1.On 3/22/22 at 9:36 AM V7, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) came in to provide incontinent care after R18 was incontinent of stool. The urine in R18's catheter bag was murky brown. V7 donned gloves without performing hand hygiene, and using disposable wipes, wiped visible fecal material from R18's buttocks and rectum. V7's gloves were visibly soiled, and she changed gloves without performing hand hygiene. She then turned R18 onto her back and wiped fecal material from R18's thighs and groin but did not spread R18's labia to cleanse her meatus or the catheter tubing. V7 then wiped R18's catheter from about an inch from insertion…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-03-25 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review the facility failed to develop baseline care plans for 1 of 20 residents (R278) reviewed for baseline care plans in a sample of 49. Findings include: 1. R278's Face Sheet documents she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of acute renal failure, dependence on renal dialysis, chronic kidney disease, anemia in chronic kidney disease and renal osteodystrophy. R278's Transfer Orders for Receiving Facility, dated 3/11/2022 documents a dialysis center under contact information and after-discharge care. R278's Baseline Care Plan, dated 3/12/2022 documents focus areas dated 3/15/2022 musculoskeletal/skin infection, discharge to community and advanced directives. R278's Care Plan did not address R278's need for dialysis and R278's dialysis schedule at a community-based dialysis center. On 3/23/2022 at 8:30 AM, V11, Registered Nurse (RN) stated the resident goes to dialysis Mondays, Wednesdays and Fridays. On 3/24/2022 at 2:35 PM V35, Regional Director of Clinical…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-03-25 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to apply pressure ulcer treatments as ordered by the physician and failed to identify, assess and treat a new pressure ulcer for 3 of 3 residents (R18, R25 and R29) reviewed for pressure ulcers in the sample of 49. Findings include: 1.R18's Face Sheet documents her diagnoses to include Pressure Ulcer of Sacral Region, Unstageable. R18's Weekly skin notes document R18's Pressure Wound to her coccyx was first noted upon readmission from the hospital on 1/7/22 when it measured 5 centimeters (cm) x 4 cm with no measurable depth and was a stage 2. R18's Care Plan dated 2/12/22 documents, (R18) has pressure injury buttocks Interventions include, Wound care as ordered by physician/see current TAR (Treatment administration Record). R18's current Physician Orders in her Electronic Medical Record (EMR) document her pressure ulcer treatment order dated 2/12/22 as: Cleanse coccyx with W/C (wound cleanser) and apply Santyl to Calcium Alginate sheet and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-03-25 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to monitor fluid intake and assess for fluid volume balance per plan of care for 1 of 1 residents (R287) reviewed for dialysis in the sample of 49. Finding includes: R278's Face Sheet, undated, documents she was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of Chronic Kidney Disease, Other Acute Kidney Failure and Dependence on Renal Dialysis. R278's Physician's Order Sheet (POS), dated 3/11/2022 documents Fluid Restriction: 1500 milliliter (ML) +/- 300 ml (720 ml provided by dietary). Day shift provides: 300 ml, evening shift provides: 300 ml, night shift provides: 180 ml. R278's Care Plan dated 3/23/2022 (updated during the survey) documents (R278) has a potential fluid imbalance r/t (related to) dialysis. R278's Goal documents (R278) will have adequate fluid volume balance AEB (as evidence by) good skin turgor, pink and moist mucous membranes and sufficient fluid intake through next review. The Care Plan Approaches document Discuss with resident any concerns about…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-03-25 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to obtain and administer intravenous (IV) medication and an anticoagulant as ordered by the physician for 1 of 3 residents (R274) reviewed for significant medication error in the sample of 49. Findings include: R274's undated Face Sheet documents she was admitted on [DATE]. Diagnosis included: bacteremia (presence of bacteria in the bloodstream). R274's admission summary dated [DATE] documents resident was admitted on [DATE]. The Summary documents The resident arrived to the facility via stretcher. Resident is alert to person alert to place alert to time. Resident admitted with active infection. A vascular access device is in place. R274's Physician's Order Sheet, dated 3/17/2022, documents R274 should receive Heparin (anticoagulant) lock flush solution, use 5 milliliters (ML) intravenously (IV) every shift related to bacteremia flush each lumen of the Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter (PICC) line with 10 ml normal saline and then 5 ml Heparin 10…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$138,662 in federal fines across 6 penalties. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.
- $25,490 — penalty dated 2026-07-29
- $47,405 — penalty dated 2025-11-06
- $12,214 — penalty dated 2024-11-21
- $14,316 — penalty dated 2024-07-09
- $26,198 — penalty dated 2024-05-21
- $13,039 — penalty dated 2023-12-18
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2026-04-22 for 29 days
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to JENMAX GROUP — 7 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1 of 5 | 1.0 | ≈ chain avg |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 1.9 | +0.1 vs chain |
| Staffing | 1 of 5 | 1.0 | ≈ chain avg |
| Quality measures | 4 of 5 | 2.9 | +1.1 vs chain |
The other 6 homes this chain runs (chain average 1.0★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IL2 OPCO HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 12/01/2023 |
| JM SNF MEMBER LLC | Organization | DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 12/01/2023 |
| IL2 OPCO INV LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 60% | since 12/01/2023 |
| 6277 CENTER GROVE ROAD LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 12/01/2023 |
| CCG BARBADOS, LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 10/21/2025 |
| GARFINKEL, AKIVA | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 12/01/2023 |
| GARFINKEL, ALLAN | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 12/01/2023 |
| JENMAX HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 12/01/2023 |
| GARCIA, MARY | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 08/13/2025 |
| GAZIANO, DOMINIC | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 11/01/2024 |
| GPN FAMILY TRUST | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 10/23/2025 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 23 rows in the source record cover these 11 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
7 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $416K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in IL
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Illinois Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 145846. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2024-05-21, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.