No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Pekin Manor

1520 El Camino Drive, Pekin, IL 61554 · Non profit - Corporation · 130 certified beds · (309) 353-1099 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (309) 353-1099 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0602) — cited Mar 2024Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)2 actual-harm citations$9,110 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • a strong health-inspection score (4/5) — the hardest rating to game (though it’s ranked within its own state, not nationally)
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0602), cited Mar 2024
  • it has 2 actual-harm citations
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (21) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $9,110 in federal fines (most recent 2025-06-27)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)
  • its last standard health inspection was over 2 years ago — the star rating may not reflect current conditions

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

4/5
CMS overall
4 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 4 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 2 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
19 Olt Ave · (309) 353-6301 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
2020 Court St · (309) 347-5589 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
1105 Derby St · (309) 347-7628 · Call to confirm hours
Park
(309) 347-4000 · Typically dawn to dusk

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 2 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 2 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 2 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 4 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating4★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased27.6%13.4%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight1.7%6.3%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.7%0.9%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection3.2%1.5%2.0%worse
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms17.3%54.2%6.5%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury8.1%3.1%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened31.2%14.3%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication15.2%18.3%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine98.8%91.8%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers1.9%4.8%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control23.8%20.6%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table8.3%21.7%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.4%2.2%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine84.6%63.1%79.4%typical
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission29.1%26.1%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit19.4%13.9%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.922.021.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days3.072.221.80worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

58.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 245 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

58.0%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
12.2%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
44.9%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.44U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.28hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.10hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.05hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 44.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 165 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.44 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 74% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 14% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF58.0%CMS range 50.9–63.151.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024better than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF12.2%CMS range 9.3–15.710.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge44.9%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge42.4%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge50.3%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified99.5%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting98.7%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.9%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.5%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.3%CMS range 4.2–12.27.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.751.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.55
RN hours/ resident / day
0.53
LPN hours/ resident / day
3.15
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.23
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.40
RN hoursweekends
51.6%
Total nursing turnover
54.5%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 130 beds and averages 97.1 residents a day — about 75% occupied, or roughly 33 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.23 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.550 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.15 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.03 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.31 on weekdays — 7% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.61 to 0.40 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 52% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

5
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2024-09-26)
2
at the previous standard inspection (2023-11-02)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

21 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 9 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · Gcited before2025-06-27 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to develop and implement pressure relieving interventions to prevent pressure ulcer development, conduct a pressure ulcer risk assessment once a week for four weeks after admission and then quarterly thereafter, update pressure ulcer care plans with pressure relieving interventions, and failed to provide a treatment as ordered by the physician for three of three residents (R1, R2, and R3) reviewed for facility acquired pressure ulcers in the sample of four. These failures resulted in R1 developing a stage four full thickness pressure ulcer to the medial heel that required surgical debridement, R2 developing an infected, painful stage four pressure ulcer to the left lateral ankle that required surgical debridement, and R2 developing a painful stage four pressure ulcer to the right lateral heel that required surgical debridement. Findings include: The facility's Pressure Injury/Pressure Ulcer Prevention and Treatment Protocol dated 10-24-22…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2025-02-10 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation and record review, the facility failed to ensure the floor was free and clear of trip hazards for one of three residents (R1) reviewed for falls with injury in a sample of four. On 01/05/25, R1 fell at the facility after a cord on the floor of the walkway entering her room became trapped in the wheel of her walker. R1 sustained a laceration to her forehead requiring placement of nine sutures, a skin tear and bruising to her right third finger, and fractures to C1 (first cervical vertebrae) and C2 (second cervical vertebrae), requiring R1 to wear a hard cervical collar at all times. Findings include: R1's Fall Investigation (dated 01/05/25) documents the following: On 01/05/25, at approximately 03:10 PM, RN (Registered Nurse) was notified by CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant) resident (R1) had a witnessed fall. Resident was walking with her walker and assist of one CNA with gait belt in place to the bathroom when resident's walker caught on the bed remote causing resident to lose…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-27 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to implement enhanced barrier precautions and contact precautions during wound and incontinence cares for four of four residents (R1-R4) reviewed for infection control practices in the sample of four. Findings include: The facility's Enhanced Barrier Precautions Policy dated 3/28/24 documents, It is the policy of the facility to use proper PPE (Personal Protective Equipment) during high-contact resident care activities that provide opportunities for transfer of MDROs (Multi-Drug Resistant Organisms) to staff hands and clothing. 1. Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) refer to an infection control intervention designated to reduce transmission of multidrug resistant organisms that employs targeted gown and glove use during high contact resident care activities. 2. EBP are used in conjunction with standard precautions and expand the use of PPE to donning of gown and gloves during high-contact resident care activities that provide opportunities for transfer of MDROs to staff hands and clothing. 3. EBP are indicated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-27 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to answer a call light timely to provide timely incontinence cares and dressing, failed to maintain a resident's dignity for one of four residents (R4) reviewed for resident rights in the sample of four. Findings include: The facility's Resident Rights policy dated 11/28/17 documents, the resident has a right to a dignified existence, self-determination, and communication with and access to persona and services inside and outside the facility, including those specified in this section. A facility must treat each resident with respect and dignity and care for each resident in a manner and in an environment that promotes maintenance or enhancement of his or her qualify of life, recognizing each residents' individuality. The facility must protect and promote the rights of the resident. The facility's Call Light Policy dated 01/20024 documents, Answer a call light promptly. Listen to resident's request. Do not make him/her feel that you are too busy to help. Respond to request. Offer further assistance before leaving…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-26 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to cover a urinary catheter bag with a privacy bag for one of 24 residents (R18) reviewed for dignity in the sample of 33 Findings include: The Resident Rights Booklet, dated 11/18, documents, Your facility must treat you with dignity and respect and must care for you in a manner that promotes your quality of life. Your facility must be safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike. R18's current computerized medical record documents R18 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included Neuromuscular Dysfunction of Bladder, Overactive Bladder, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus with Diabetic Neuropathy, and Essential (Primary) Hypertension. R18's MDS (Minimum Data Set) Assessment, dated 8/29/24, documents a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) Score of 14/15, indicating cognition intact and has an indwelling catheter. R18's Care Plan, dated 8/18/21, documents R18 has a catheter related to neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder. R18's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-26 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify the facility Ombudsman of Facility Discharges/Transfers, monthly, for two residents (R26 and R67) of 7 reviewed for discharges in the sample of 33. Findings include: 1. R26's current Medical Record, documents R26 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Anxiety, Vascular Dementia, Peripheral Vascular Disease, Fibromyalgia, Essential (Primary) Hypertension, and Severe Sepsis with Septic Shock R26's Nursing Note, dated 6/3/24 at 10:56 AM, documents R26 was taken to the hospital for evaluation. R26's Nursing Note, dated 6/3/24 at 11:13 AM, documents R26 was admitted to the hospital with a diagnosis of UTI/Urinary Tract Infection. R26's Social Service Note, dated 6/11/24 at 12:15 PM, documents R26 was back in the facility. R26's Nursing Note, dated 6/18/24 at 6:23 AM, documents emergency services were called to take R26 to the Emergency Room. R26's Nursing Note, dated 6/18/24 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-26 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to develop a Person Centered Care Plan for one resident (R67) out of 24 reviewed for Care Plans in a sample of 33. Findings Include: The Care Plan Policy, dated 6/1/22, documents, It is the policy of this facility to develop and implement a Base Line Care Plan, a Comprehensive Person-Centered Care Plan and conduct Care Plan Meetings as appropriate for each resident, consistent with resident rights, that includes measurable objectives and timeframe's to meter resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that are identified in the resident's comprehensive assessment. 6. The comprehensive care plan will be developed within 7 (seven) days after the completion of the comprehensive MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment as outlined in the RAI (Resident Assessment Instrument) manual guidelines. Address other factors identified by the interdisciplinary team, or in accordance with the resident's preference, will also be addressed in the plan of care.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-26 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to change an oxygen tubing/humidifier bottle for one resident (R2) of two residents reviewed for oxygen therapy in the sample of 33. Findings Include: The Oxygen Therapy policy, dated 3/16/17, documents, To provide a source of oxygen to persons experiencing an insufficient supply of same. Procedure: 7. Oxygen set-up (cannula/mask, tubing) must be exchanged every 7 (seven) days. R2's current Medical Record documents R2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included Acute Respiratory Failure with Hypoxia (Primary), Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Acute and Chronic Respiratory Failure with Hypercapnia, and Shortness of Breath. R2's Care Plan documents R2 has COPD/Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Respiratory Insufficiency, Obstructive Sleep Apnea, Restrictive Lung Disease, Recent Respiratory Acidosis, Recent Acute Hypercapnia, and Respiratory Failure. R2's oxygen setting is to be at three liters. R2's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-26 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to document a diagnosis and monitor for specific adverse behaviors to warrant the use of an antipsychotic medications for one of five residents (R249) reviewed for unnecessary medications in a sample of 33. Findings include: The facility's Psychopharmacological Drug Usage Procedure, revised 10/18/17, documents the documentation of behaviors and conditions requiring the use of these medications must be done on a routine basis, as well as medications response and adverse consequences. R249's current Medication Administration Record documents to take Quetiapine (antipsychotic) 25mg daily for Alzheimer's disease, unspecified. On 9/23/24 at 10:30am, R249 was being assisted to his wheelchair, cooperative with care. On 9/24/24 at 1:30pm, R249 was sleeping in his wheelchair. On 9/25/24 at 10:30am, R249 was sleeping in his wheelchair. R249 was encouraged to lay in bed but refused. On 9/25/24 at 11:30am, V13, Certified Nursing Assistant, stated R249 does not show any signs of adverse behaviors. V13 verified R249 is…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-06 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolated
    Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to prevent misappropriation of property for 1 resident (R1) of 3 residents reviewed for misappropriation of property in the sample of 7. The Findings include: The Abuse policy, dated 11/28/19, documents, The facility actively prohibits resident abuse including neglect, corporal punishment, involuntary seclusion, misappropriation of property, injuries of unknown sources, exploitation and use of any physical or chemical restraint not required to treat residents' symptoms. To protect residents from any kind of abuse such as verbal, sexual, mental, physical, including corporal punishment, involuntary seclusion, neglect, misappropriation of property, exploitation and any physical or chemical restraint not required to treat the resident's symptoms. The Final Investigation Report sent to the (State Agency), dated 2/13/24, documents a Drug Diversion Investigation. On 2/8/24, V2 (Regional Nurse Coordinator) notified V1 (Administrator) of a possible drug diversion for a bottle labeled Morphine Sulfate. During a routine…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-06 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolated
    Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide nail care to 1 resident (R1) of 3 residents reviewed for nail care in the sample of 7. The Findings include: The Nail Care policy, dated 3/2004, documents to provide cleanliness and prevent infection the nails should be trimmed. The Personal Care of Residents policy, dated 12/2002, documents, It is the policy of the facility to provide a plan of personal care for residents. To provide that residents of the facility receive adequate care. Each resident shall have proper daily personal attention and/or care, including skin, nails, hair, and oral hygiene, in addition to treatments ordered by the physician. R2's Nursing Note, dated 2/6/24 at 12:50 PM, documents R2 was seen today by V6 (Advanced Practical Nurse) and received an order to provide nail care. R2's Nursing Note, dated 2/7/24 at 10:48 AM, documents R2 has received a shower today and no new skin concerns. Areas on the bilateral lower extremity/BLE shows self-inflicted scratches. R2's nails have been trimmed and triamcinolone cream applied to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-02 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to perform indwelling urinary catheter care according to facility policy and failed to keep the urinary bag below the bladder and off the floor for one (R7) of two residents reviewed for indwelling catheters in a sample of 26. Findings include: The facility's undated Catheter (Maintenance and Removal) policy documents Procedure: 2. Attach drainage bag to bed frame, below level of resident's bladder - not touching the floor. Key Points: To allow flow with gravity and to avoid backflow of urine, secure catheter to thigh/lower abdomen for men .Procedure: 7. Cleanse the meatus and adjacent catheter. (Follow 'Catheter Care' procedure.) The facility's undated Catheter Care policy documents Procedure: 4. Wash perineal area with soap and water or perineal cleanser. Begin cleansing from the cleanest area in front to the most soiled area in back .On a circumcised male resident, wash the skin folds at the top of the penis using a circular motion. Clean the meatus around the catheter first and work downward .Gently clean…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 9 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-02 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to remove Personal Protective Equipment/PPE and perform hand hygiene upon exiting a COVID-19 positive resident room to prevent cross-contamination; failed to follow their COVID-19 policy regarding wearing masks for one resident (R79); and failed to perform hand hygiene during incontinence care for one resident (R7) of 19 residents reviewed for infection control in a sample of 26. Findings include: The facility's Standard Precautions policy, dated 08/09, documents Policy: Standard Precautions will be used in the care of all residents regardless of any suspected or confirmed presence of an infectious agent. Standard Precautions are based on the principle that all, blood, body fluids, secretions, excretions (except sweat), non-intact skin, and mucous membranes may contain transmissible infectious agents. Objective: To prevent the spread of infectious agents among residents and healthcare personnel in the facility Procedure: 1. Hand hygiene: a.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-24 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to perform neurological (neuro) checks every four hours as directed by the facility's policy after a resident sustained a fall with a head injury for one of three residents (R2) reviewed for falls in the sample of three. Findings include: The facility's Emergency Care Procedure policy, dated 4-3-18, documents after a fall with a head injury neuro checks should be performed every four hours for twenty-four hours following the fall. On 8-22-23 at 10:30 AM, R2 was sitting in a wheelchair in the dining room. R2 had a quarter-sized hematoma above her left eye and had extensive yellowish-purplish bruising below the left eye that extended down into R2's left cheek and left chin and R2 had yellow-purplish bruising under the right eye. R2's Progress Notes, dated 8-6-23 at 11:07 PM and signed by V7 (LPN), document, Called to resident room by CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant). (R2) observed lying on left side next to bed. (R2) has four cm (centimeter) by four cm hematoma over left eye. Complaints of pain of hematoma. No…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2022-09-15 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain a clean kitchen including can openers, refrigerators, ovens and fans; failed to label and or discard food items as needed, and failed to keep scoops out of food bins. This has the potential to affect all 90 residents living in the facility. Findings: The Food Storage and Labeling Policy, dated 10/21, states Keep all food covered in a resealable bag or container or the original container if applicable. Discard any food item past it's use by date or expiration date. Do not store any utensil in a container of food. The label should include: Product Name; Date; Discard Date; Staff Initials. Items left in their original containers should say Opened with the date. Gallons of milk should be labeled by the Open Date. The discard date is within seven days of the open date. If the expiration date is less than seven days, the milk should be discarded on the expiration date. All staff are responsible for monitoring and discarding outdated items. The Sanitation and Safety Policy, dated 9/10, stated, Can openers…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-09-15 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure all staff was wearing required Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) according to Centers for Disease Control (CDC)guidelines. This failure has the potential to affect all 90 residents in the building. Findings include: The facility's COVID-19 policy, dated 1/19/2022, documents the following: The Infection Control Program (ICP) at this facility recognizes Novel Coronavirus (COVID-19) as a highly contagious virus and has a focus to reduce the risk of unnecessary exposures among residents, staff and visitors. Measures are based on guidance from the Centers for Disease Control (CDC), Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) and state and local authorities. Interventions focus on prevention of exposure, early detection of symptoms, effective triage and isolation of potentially infectious residents. Prevention: 6. All employees must wear a well-fitted face mask while present in resident care areas. Other PPE (personal protective equipment) may be required. The facility's electronic records document…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-09-15 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive care plan with interventions to address significant weight loss (R67), psychotropic medication use (R81), and proper transfer status (R135), for three of 18 residents reviewed for comprehensive care planning, in a sample of 32. Findings include: The facility policy, titled Care Plan Policy (revised 11/28/19) documents, It is the policy of this facility to develop and implement a Base Line Care Plan, a Comprehensive Person-Centered Care Plan and conduct Care Plan Meetings as appropriate for each resident, consistent with resident rights, that includes measurable objectives and time frames to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that are identified in the resident's comprehensive assessment. The policy further documents, The comprehensive care plan will describe, at a minimum, the following: a. The services that are to be furnished to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental and psychosocial well-being and 10.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-09-15 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a pressure ulcer dressing/packing was not soiled with feces prior to covering it with a dressing for one of two residents (R12) reviewed for pressure ulcers in the sample of 32. Findings include: The facility's Wound Care policy, dated 3/2004, documents, Objective: To prevent the wound from contamination and control bleeding. All wound treatments should be done in an aseptic manner, employing standard precautions throughout. R12's Wound Evaluation & Management Summary, dated 9/13/22, documents R12 has a full thickness stage 4 pressure ulcer to her coccyx measuring 1.8 cm (centimeters) x 1.3 cm x 1 cm. R12's Physician's Orders, dated 9/14/22, documents R12 has an order to cleanse R12's coccyx, apply skin prep to peri-wound, apply collagen to wound bed, lightly pack with calcium alginate, and cover with a border dressing two times a day. On 9/14/22 at 11:04 AM, R12 had open area to her coccyx with significant depth. The edges of the wound were macerated. V9 (Licensed Practical Nurse) cleansed the wound…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-09-15 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a gait belt was used during a transfer with a stand aid, for one of six residents (R135) reviewed for transfer assistance in a sample of 32. Findings include: The facility policy, titled Safe Resident Handling (revised 11/12) documents, the Facility is dedicated to providing quality care to residents who have entrusted their lives to us, and to provide a work environment that is safe and enjoyable to our staff. Our Safe Resident Handling Program is designed to meet the following goals: Improve working conditions by reducing the incident of back fatigue and musculoskeletal injuries; Maintain a high level of resident dignity and quality of care; Standardize all lifting procedures and provide the tools to life safely; Protect staff and residents from injury. The policy later documents, 9. When physically transferring residents, gait belts will be used to maintain appropriate transfer technique. The Electronic Medical Record documents R135 was admitted to the facility for Therapy Services following…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-09-15 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow the Registered Dietitian's dietary recommendations in a timely manner for a resident that experienced a significant weight loss, for one of two residents (R67) reviewed for nutrition, in a sample of 32. Findings include: The facility policy, titled Weight Monitoring (revised 6/21) documents, Objective: 1. To consistently assess residents for significant weight loss or gain. The policy documents that Licensed staff will notify the physician of the following: A. 5% or more gain or loss in 30-day period. B. 7 1/2 % or more gain or loss in a 90 day period. C. 10% or more gain or loss in a 180 day period. Notification to the physician must be documented, and also whether or not new orders were received. Lastly, the policy advises, 6. The RD (Registered Dietitian) will review significant weight losses and any other residents referred by the weight committee on a monthly basis, and make recommendations to physicians as necessary. The Electronic Medical Record documents R67 has the current diagnoses of Vascular Dementia…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-09-15 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to document clinically indicated diagnoses and behaviors to justify the use of an antipsychotic, failed to initiate an antipsychotic at the lowest dose, failed to implement non-pharmacological interventions, failed to perform a GDR (Gradual Dose Reduction), and failed to complete an AIMs (Abnormal Involuntary Movements) assessment for three of six residents (R18, R46, R49) reviewed for antipsycotic medication use, in the sample of 32. Findings include: The facility's Psychopharmacologic Drug Usage Procedure, dated 10/18/17, documents, AIMS testing must be done on all residents receiving anti-psychotic (neuroleptic) drugs at initiation of the therapy and at least every six months thereafter. Documentation of behaviors and conditions requiring the use of these medications must be done on a routine basis, as well as medication response and adverse consequences. Gradual Dose Reductions must be attempted. Psychopharmacologic drugs must have a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$9,110 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

  • $9,110 — penalty dated 2025-06-27

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to UNLIMITED DEVELOPMENT, INC. — 10 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 4 of 52.5+1.5 vs chain
Health inspection 4 of 52.6+1.4 vs chain
Staffing 2 of 52.5-0.5 vs chain
Quality measures 2 of 52.4-0.4 vs chain
The other 9 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.5★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
UNLIMITED DEVELOPMENT, INCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 06/01/2009
URNIKIS, MICHELLEIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 09/04/2018
FINKE, AUDREYIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 08/30/2018
GILMORE, JERRYIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 04/26/2006
HANEY, DAVIDIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 04/26/2006
WAGNER, ROBERTIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICERsince 04/26/2006
WILSON, RONALDIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 08/30/2018
UDI# 10, LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 06/01/2009

CMS files one row per role, so the 9 rows in the source record cover these 8 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$8.7M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-17.9%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$540K
Related-party expense5% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 48%Medicare 9%Other / private 43%

This home reported $540K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$324per resident / day
operating cost
$9,858per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$275per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IL

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Illinois Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Illinois
$8,304/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$9,216/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,219/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 145597. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2024-09-26, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next