Prairie Oasis
16000 South Wabash, South Holland, IL 60473 · For profit - Individual · 135 certified beds · (708) 339-0600 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- CMS has flagged it for abuse
- it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0602) — most recent Dec 2025
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605, F0607, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (66) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $305,710 in federal fines (most recent 2026-02-08)
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
- its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (1/5)
- about 27% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 1 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 1 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 1 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 3 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 1 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 6.9% | 13.4% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 3.6% | 6.3% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.9% | 0.9% | 0.9% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 1.2% | 1.5% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 93.6% | 54.2% | 6.5% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 6.4% | 3.1% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 5.3% | 14.3% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 2.4% | 18.3% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 81.4% | 91.8% | 95.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 5.7% | 4.8% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 19.5% | 20.6% | 21.2% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 21.5% | 21.7% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 5.0% | 2.2% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 22.2% | 63.1% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 43.7% | 26.1% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 16.3% | 13.9% | 12.0% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 2.11 | 2.02 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 2.41 | 2.22 | 1.80 | worse |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
46.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 32 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.21 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 24% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 71% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy at close to weekday levels right through the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 46.6%CMS range 30.1–68.2 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 9.7%CMS range 5.9–13.3 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 91.9% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 5.4% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 8.5%CMS range 4.7–13.7 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.18 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 135 beds and averages 113.5 residents a day — about 84% occupied, or roughly 22 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.26 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.59 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.05 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.67 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.50 on weekdays — 24% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.71 to 0.29 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 44% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
66 citations, most serious first. The 21 most serious are shown; the remaining 45 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2026-02-20 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a hazard free environment for two (R1, R5) of 4 (R1, R2, R4 and R5) residents reviewed for hazards/supervision. This failure resulted in R1 getting out of bed and falling on an uncovered radiator heater resulting in R1 suffering second degree burns to the right shoulder and right hip and admitted to the hospital's burn intensive care unit for evaluation and treatment of severe burns. This failure also resulted in R5 suffering a laceration to the left eye that required sutures, subdural hematomas that required R5 to be admitted to the hospital's intensive care unit and ultimately resulted in admission to hospice due to the subdural hematoma. The immediate jeopardy began on 2/07/2026 when R1 was found lying on an uncovered radiator heater. V1 (Administrator) was notified on 2/18/2026 at 11:02am of the Immediate Jeopardy.The surveyor confirmed by observation, interview and record review the Immediate Jeopardy was removed on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2026-02-08 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure timely assessment and implementation of preventative measures to prevent the development of a pressure ulcer for one (R1) of three residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. This failure resulted in R1 developing a facility-acquired Stage 3 pressure ulcer to the coccyx.Findings include: R1 is a [AGE] year-old resident admitted to the facility on [DATE] to 11/13/25 with diagnoses including but not limited to: atrial fibrillation, seizure, hypertension, cerebrovascular accident, obesity, depression, cognitive and communication deficit, dementia, cerebral amyloid angiopathy, anxiety, history of encephalopathy, and coronary artery disease. R1's (MDS) Minimal Data Set assessment of 10/13/2025, section C, the BIMS (Brief Interviewed Mental Status) score was 03/15 (severely impaired cognition). MDS of 10/13/2025, GG section R1 is dependent on self-care- Helper does all the effort. The resident does none of the effort to complete the activity. Or the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-12-18 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to prevent staff to resident physical abuse and neglect. These failures resulted in R1 sustaining a fractured left humerus and R3 sustaining moisture associated skin damage/skin breakdown. These failures affected two (R1 and R3) of six residents reviewed for abuse/neglect. Findings include:1) R3's face sheet documents, R3 is an [AGE] year-old resident and has diagnoses including, but not limited to: cirrhosis of the liver, unspecified supracondylar fracture of the left humerus, dementia without behavioral disturbance, unspecified protein calorie malnutrition, other disorders of bone density and structure, functional quadriplegia and metabolic encephalopathy. R3's minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE], documents, R3 has a brief interview of mental status (BIMS) summary score of 3, indicating R3 has severe cognitive impairment. Additionally, the MDS documents indicates R3 requires assistance from staff with activities of daily living (ADLs), that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-12-18 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide incontinence care and showers for one (R1) resident that was dependent on staff for ADL (activities of daily living) care. This failure affected one (R1) of six residents reviewed for ADL care. This failure resulted in R1 experiencing pain and development of moisture associated skin damage (open areas). R1's face sheet documents in part that R1 is a [AGE] year-old resident with a prior medical history including: hemiplegia affecting left side, type 2 diabetes mellitus, depression, hypothyroidism, and hypertension. R1's MDS dated [DATE], documents R1 has a BIMS summary score of 13, indicating that R1 is cognitively intact. Additionally, the MDS indicates R1 did not have any moisture associated skin damage at the time of the assessment. On 12/13/2025 at 10:27 AM, R1 affirmed R1 is incontinent of bowel/bladder and explained, They (staff) never change me regularly. I have had open areas on my buttocks and thighs for about a week or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-09-12 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that two-person assistance was utilized during resident care, as required by the resident's care plan, to maintain safety. This deficient practice affected one of three residents (Resident #13) reviewed for safety during care. As a result, Resident #13 fell from the bed during care, which led to the dislodgement of the resident's gastrostomy tube and required hospitalization for replacement. On 9/12/25 at 9:37 AM, R13 was observed able to nod head yes or no to questions asked. When questioned if able to raise arms off bed, R13 nodded head 'no'. On 9/9/25 at 4:00 PM, V2 DON (director of nursing) stated V2 wrote up V9 CNA (certified nurse aide) for improper care resulting in R13's fall out of bed. V2 stated R13 is a two-person assist with all care.On 9/11/25 at 12:08 PM, V10 RN (registered nurse) stated she worked night shift 11:00 PM 8/20/25 to 7:30 AM 8/21/25. V10 stated she had just changed R13 with the night shift CNA at 4:00 AM. V10 stated R13 is not able to assist with turning/repositioning. V10 stated R13…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-02-27 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to complete a post fall assessment of a resident immediately following a fall; failed to ensure a resident's physician was notified after a fall; failed to ensure residents received medications as ordered by the physician; and failed to ensure the physician was notified of abnormal lab results. These failures applied to three of four residents (R3, R4, R5) reviewed for quality of care and resulted in R3 having a delay in care of approximately two days after a fall in which R3 was found to have a hip fracture that required surgical intervention. Findings include: 1. R3 is a [AGE] year-old male with a diagnoses history of COPD, Heart Failure, Unspecified Convulsions, and Alcohol Abuse who was admitted to the facility 08/14/2024. R3's Current Care Plan documents he is at risk for falls related to requiring assistance with activities of daily living and for transfers and mobility related tasks with interventions implemented 08/15/2024 including be sure call…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-02-11 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to follow resident care assessment and plan in providing adequate supervision and monitoring of residents with severe cognitive impairment for two (R3 and R4) of four residents reviewed for accidents and supervision. This deficiency resulted in R4 had a fall in the dining room and sustained a comminuted and mildly displaced fractures of the left medial acetabular wall and root of the superior pubic ramus (hip/pelvic area). Findings include: 1. R3 is an [AGE] year old, female, admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Parkinson's Disease without Dyskinesia, without Mention of Fluctuations; Depression, Unspecified; Schizoaffective Disorder, Unspecified; Dementia in other Diseases Classified Elsewhere, Unspecified Severity, without Behavioral Disturbance, Mood Disturbance and Anxiety; and History of Falling. MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 12/10/24 recorded R3 has BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 7 which means severe…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-12-27 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to identify and treat wounds on a resident (R1) before R1 was sent out to the hospital for one of three residents reviewed for wound care in a total sample of eight. This failure resulted in the unidentified wounds being present on R1's heels for an unknown amount of time without being treated. Findings Include: R1 is an [AGE] year old with the following diagnosis: type 2 diabetes, peripheral vascular disease (PVD), and rheumatoid arthritis. A Nursing note dated 11/3/24 documents R1 had a boil on the sacrum that burst and left an open area. The nurse practitioner was notified and ordered to cleanse the wound daily and apply a dry dressing. A Physician note dated 11/13/24 documents R1 currently has no concerns and is at baseline. The Treatment Nurse Initial Skin Alteration Review dated 11/4/24 documents a full thickness wound to the sacrum was identified on 11/3/24 and measured 0.3 cm x 0.3 cm x 1 cm. The wound bed had 100% granulation tissue with a small…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-12-27 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to monitor a high fall risk resident (R2) during a scheduled monitoring period for one out of three residents reviewed for falls in a total sample of eight. This failure resulted in R2 suffering a right fractured hip after falling from a chair while reaching out for a nearby object when unsupervised. Findings Include: R2 is an [AGE] year old with the following diagnosis: history of falling, dementia, and age-related osteoporosis. A Nursing note dated 12/8/24 documents it was reported by the CNA (V9) that R2 slid out of a chair attempting to reach for something that was in another chair. V9 reported R2 fell onto the right hip. R2 denied any pain upon assessment and was placed back into bed. X-rays of the hip/pelvis were ordered. R2 remains alert and oriented times one per baseline. The Unusual Occurrence Final Investigative Report Form dated 12/13/24 documents R2 slid out of a chair while attempting to reach for something that was in another chair. R2 fell…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-11-14 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow their policy by failing to provide an individualized plan of care with effective interventions to prevent falls; the facility failed to provide supervision while walking in corridors per resident assessment. These failures applied to one (R1) of five residents reviewed for falls and resulted in R1 having three falls in the last three months and requiring hospital transfer for medical treatment of a laceration and hematoma after the last two falls. Findings include: R1 is [AGE] years old and has resided at the facility since 2022, past medical history includes Altered mental status unspecified, anxiety disorder, hallucinations, malignant neoplasm of unspecified site of female breast, metabolic encephalopathy, unspecified dementia, unspecified fall, unspecified protein calorie malnutrition, etc. 11/12/2024 2:15PM, R1 was observed in her room sleeping, bed not low and no floor mats on either side of the bed. Resident's walker was noted in the room…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-06-05 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and records reviewed the facility failed to ensure one resident (R6) remained free from resident to resident sexual assault. This affected two of three residents (R6, R8) reviewed sexual abuse. This failure resulted in R6 being kissed in the mouth unwantedly by R8. R6 said she feels scared and on-guard when walking past R8. Findings include: Final Facility Incident Report shows R6 reported to facility that R8 kissed R6 on the lips. The following conclusion was determined about the allegation: abuse is founded. R8 has diagnosis including but not limited to Alzheimer's Disease, Dementia, Psychosis, Weakness, Cognitive Communication Deficit, Violent behaviors, and Homicidal Ideations. R8's cognitive assessment dated [DATE] indicates a score of 9, impaired. R6 diagnosis include but are not limited to Hemiplegia following Cerebral Vascular Infarction, Hypertensive Heart Disease, Dysphagia, Hyperlipidemia, Alcohol Abuse, and Cocaine Abuse. R6's cognitive assessment dated [DATE] indicates a score of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-21 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to implement fall preventive measures for a resident who is a high fall risk. This deficiency affects one (R3) of three residents reviewed for Falls prevention program. Findings include:R3 is an [AGE] year-old admitted to facility on 7/3/19 with the following diagnosis: cerebral infarction, aphasia, dysphagia, essential hypertension, hyperlipidemia, secondary hypertension, anemia, age related osteoporosis without current pathological fracture, insomnia, presence of right artificial hip joint, dementia, depression, history of falling, low back pain, personal history of urinary tract infections.Facility reported incident indicates on 2/28/26 R3, upon rounds staff note resident sitting on her left side of the bed between the dresser and bed. The incident occurred during self-transfer from bed without assistance. She (R3) denies any pain no discomfort noted. She is able to move all extremities, and all limbs are in good alignment. She denies any…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-02-20 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespreadProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to have sufficient nursing staff to meet the resident needs and failed to ensure the facility was staffed in accordance with the facility assessment. This failure affects all 112 residents that reside within the facility. Findings include: Facility census (2/11/2026) documents in part that 112 residents reside within the facility. R4's Face Sheet documents in part the following diagnoses: rhabdomyolysis, fusion of spine (lumbar region), inflammatory spondylopathy lumbar region, type 2 diabetes mellitus with diabetic neuropathy, unspecified protein calorie malnutrition, neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder, obesity, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and major depressive disorder without psychotic features. R4's Minimum Data Set (12/16/2025) document in part a brief interview of mental status (BIMS) summary score of 15, indicating R4 is cognitively intact. Additionally, R4's minimum data set documents that R4 is dependent on staff for toileting assistance. On 2/13/2026 at 1:00 PM, R4 explained, Yes, the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2026-02-20 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — widespreadProvide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to have sufficient dietary staff to meet resident needs and to serve meals timely. This failure affected all 106 residents that consume food from the facility's kitchen. Findings include:Facility census (2/11/2026) documents in part that 112 residents reside within the facility. Facility document titled RESIDENTS THAT ARE NPO (Nothing By Mouth) (2/2026) documents in part that 6 residents do not consume oral intake. This indicates that 106 residents consume food from the facility's kitchen. R4's Face Sheet documents in part the following diagnoses: rhabdomyolysis, fusion of spine (lumbar region), inflammatory spondylopathy lumbar region, type 2 diabetes mellitus with diabetic neuropathy, unspecified protein calorie malnutrition, neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder, obesity, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and major depressive disorder without psychotic features. R4's Minimum Data Set (12/16/2025) document in part a brief interview of mental status (BIMS) summary score of 15, indicating R4 is…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-02-20 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — widespreadEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure menu variety for dinner, failed to honor resident preferences and cultural/ethnic considerations, failed to follow recipes for the written menu, and failed to obtain dietician input for any substitutions made to the recipes/menu. This failure affected all 106 residents that consume food from the facility's kitchen.Findings include: Facility census (2/11/2026) documents in part that 112 residents reside within the facility. Facility document titled RESIDENTS THAT ARE NPO (Nothing By Mouth) (2/2026) documents in part that 6 residents do not consume oral intake. This indicates that 106 residents consume food from the facility's kitchen. R4's Face Sheet documents in part the following diagnoses: rhabdomyolysis, fusion of spine (lumbar region), inflammatory spondylopathy lumbar region, type 2 diabetes mellitus with diabetic neuropathy, unspecified protein calorie malnutrition, neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder, obesity, chronic…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2026-02-20 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — widespreadEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to serve food to residents in a manner that is palatable and attractive. This failure has the potential to affect all 106 residents that consume food from the facility's kitchen. Findings include:Facility census (2/11/2026) documents in part that 112 residents reside within the facility. Facility document titled RESIDENTS THAT ARE NPO (Nothing By Mouth) (2/2026) documents in part that 6 residents do not consume oral intake. This indicates that 106 residents consume food from the facility's kitchen. R4's Face Sheet documents in part the following diagnoses: rhabdomyolysis, fusion of spine (lumbar region), inflammatory spondylopathy lumbar region, type 2 diabetes mellitus with diabetic neuropathy, unspecified protein calorie malnutrition, neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder, obesity, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and major depressive disorder without psychotic features. R4's Minimum Data Set (12/16/2025) document in part a brief interview of mental status (BIMS) summary score of 15, indicating R4 is…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-02-20 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to procure sufficient amounts of food ingredients to properly follow the written menu and failed to have enough food items to follow written menu/serve every resident according to the written menu. This failure affected all 106 residents that consume meals from the facility's kitchen. Findings include: Facility census (2/11/2026) documents in part that 112 residents reside within the facility. Facility document titled RESIDENTS THAT ARE NPO (Nothing By Mouth) (2/2026) documents in part that 6 residents do not consume oral intake. This indicates that 106 residents consume food from the facility's kitchen. R4's Face Sheet documents in part the following diagnoses: rhabdomyolysis, fusion of spine (lumbar region), inflammatory spondylopathy lumbar region, type 2 diabetes mellitus with diabetic neuropathy, unspecified protein calorie malnutrition, neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder, obesity, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and major depressive disorder without psychotic features. R4's Minimum Data Set…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2026-02-20 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — widespreadConduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to address any ethnic, cultural or religious factors that may potentially affect the care provided by the facility, including but not limited to, activities and food and nutrition services and failed to identify a staffing plan for nutritional support staff. These failures have the potential to affect all 112 residents that reside within the facility. Facility census (2/11/2026) documents in part that 112 residents reside within the facility. R4's Face Sheet documents in part the following diagnoses: rhabdomyolysis, fusion of spine (lumbar region), inflammatory spondylopathy lumbar region, type 2 diabetes mellitus with diabetic neuropathy, unspecified protein calorie malnutrition, neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder, obesity, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and major depressive disorder without psychotic features. On 2/13/2026 at 1:00 PM, R4 explained, The food here is terrible, barely edible. I am afraid to eat the entree a lot of the times because it gives me (diarrhea). One of the worst things about the food…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-20 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide incontinence care for residents that were dependent on staff for incontinence care. This failure affected four (R1 R3 R4 and R5) of four residents reviewed for incontinence care. Findings include: R1's Face Sheet documents in part the following diagnoses: Alzheimer's disease, severe dementia with other behavioral disturbance, unspecified protein-calorie malnutrition, hypomyelination with atrophy of the basal ganglia and cerebellum, chronic kidney disease unspecified, adult failure to thrive, restlessness and agitation, cachexia, and unspecified convulsions. R1 Minimum Data Set (11/12/2025) documents in part that R1 dependent on staff for toileting assistance and is always incontinent of bowel and bladder.R1's care plan (revised 11/12/2025) documents in part that R1 has an activity of daily living (ADL) self-care deficit due to confusion, dementia, impaired balance and limited mobility, and indicates that R1 is totally dependent on staff for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-08 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain complete and accurate clinical records by not retaining skin assessment and skin monitoring documentation necessary to demonstrate compliance with physician orders as part of the resident's medical record. This failure applied to one (R1) of three residents reviewed for medical records. Findings include: R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. A physician's order dated 10/03/2025 required weekly skin assessments on shower or bath day.Facility policy titled Pressure Injury and Skin Condition Assessment Policy dated 9/2016 required:Weekly head-to-toe skin assessments by a licensed nurse for residents at high risk;Daily observation for skin breakdown by certified nursing assistants;Documentation of skin assessments in the resident's medical record or on facility-approved forms.On 2/7/2026 at 1:45 PM, V4 (Wound Care Nurse) stated the facility utilized shower sheets and skin alteration sheets completed by nursing assistants to document skin…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-12-18 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — widespreadDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to implement their abuse policy; failed to suspend a staff member pending an allegation of staff to resident physical abuse; and failed to prevent retaliation of a staff member after reporting abuse. This failure affects one (R3) of six residents reviewed for abuse and has the potential to affect all 118 residents that reside within the facility. Findings include: Facility census (12/13/2025) documents in part that 118 residents reside within the facility. Review of R3's progress notes indicate that on 12/11/2025 at 10:10 AM, documents in part, CNA notified writer of resident complaint of pain at Lt arm. Upon arrival to resident's room, resident in lying in bed alert and oriented x 2. During assessment resident's Lt arm is swollen, painful to touch, and resident is yelling out in when she attempts to move Lt arm. No other apparent abnormalities noted. Writer gently placed Lt arm on pillow. T 98.1 P 65 R 20 BP 100/66 02 sat 95% RA. (V6) to be notified for pain medication orders. At 10:15 AM, R3 was seen by V13…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 45 citations
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-18 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolatedHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to respond and resolve resident grievances in a timely manner. This failure affects one of six residents (R1) reviewed for grievances. Findings include: R1's face sheet documents in part R1 is a [AGE] year-old resident with a prior medical history including: hemiplegia affecting left side, type 2 diabetes mellitus, depression, hypothyroidism, and hypertension. Record review of grievances (5/5/2025, 7/3/2025, 11/11/2025) document, in part, concerns with R1 receiving showers. The grievance dated 11/11/2025 does not indicate if the grievance was resolved or unresolved, the complainant's response to the resolution or signature from the administrator. On 12/13/2025 at 10:27 AM, R1 stated R1 has complained about showers to R1's family members and staff and stated staff do not respond timely to concerns. R1 affirmed R1's family will also complain to staff about concerns and nothing gets resolved. R1 stated, I haven't had a shower in over a month. On 12/13/2025…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-18 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to report an injury of unknown origin to the state survey agency within 2 hours for one (R3) of six residents reviewed for reporting. This failure resulted in R3 experiencing left arm pain and swelling and being transferred to the hospital and diagnosed with closed supracondylar fracture of the left humerus.Findings include:Record review of initial report to the state survey agency (12/12/2025) documents in part, that on 12/11/2025 at 10:10 AM, R3's left arm was observed swollen and painful to the touch. At 22:16, R3 returned from the hospital with a diagnosis of closed supracondylar fracture of the left humerus. The facsimile transmission for the initial report documents in part, that the reportable was faxed on 12/12/2025 at 3:30 PM. On 12/13/2025 at 3:45 PM, V1 (Administrator) affirmed V1 is aware of R3's fracture and that the facility does not know how R3 got the fracture. V1 explained, (R3) wasn't able to say what happened, (R3) just kept saying…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-09-12 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespreadHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to provide sufficient RN (registered nurse) coverage for the second quarter of 2025. Per PBJ (payroll based journal) requirements there should be an RN working 8 consecutive hours 7 days a week. This failure has the potential to affect all residents residing in the facility. Findings include:On 9/9/25 at 9:30 AM, there was signage posted at the main receptionist desk, dated 8/19/25, noting 'this facility did not meet the minimum staffing ratios required by law for the quarter ending March 31st, 2025.On 9/12/25 at 9:00 AM, V2 DON (director of nursing) stated that for 21 days during the second quarter PBJ report there wasn't an RN present for 8 consecutive hours 7 days a week.The facility's staffing sheets for January, February, and March were reviewed. Per V18 RN (registered nurse), V19 RN, V20 RN, V21 RN, and V22 RN time punches, the facility did not routinely have an RN present for 8 consecutive hours on New Year's Day, Saturdays, and Sundays:1/1/25 - RN time punch requested during survey but not made…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-09-12 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — patternEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and record review, the facility failed to follow their recipe by not utilizing the appropriate serving size for zucchini, lettuce and cheese during lunch service. This has the potential to affect all 58 resident receiving regular diet. In addition, the facility, failed to provide pureed tortilla during lunch service for 20 of 20 residents receiving pureed diets.Findings include: On 9/9/25 at 11:49AM kitchen tray line observed with V13 (Cook). Lunch being served was beef taco on a tortilla with lettuce, cheese, onion and tomato with zucchini and refried beans. V13 said the mechanical soft diet is the same as regular but without lettuce. V13 observed using a tongs to serve the zucchini. No measurement or tools used for cheese, lettuce and tomatoes. V13 using gloved hand to place on cheese, lettuce and tomatoes the plates.Facility recipe for shredded lettuce with diced tomatoes and cheese documents to portion as garnish 1/2 cup of lettuce and tomato with tablespoon of shredded cheese.Facility recipe for seasoned zucchini documents to serve with #8 scoop to provide…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-09-12 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the dishwasher was working to provide the correct sanitation solution during washing and utilized the dishes for the next meal service. In addition, the facility failed to follow their thawing policy by leaving raw pork on the stove top (that was off) and reaching a danger zone temperature of 60 degrees after being left out for over four hours. This has the potential to affect all 99 residents receiving meals.Findings include:On 9/9/25 at11:49Am, tray line observation conducted and facility using regular plates, silverware and cups for meal service.On 9/9/25 at 1:46PM, V14 (dietary aide) low temp/sanitizer dish washer checked. Chlorine test strip did not turn. V14 said it didn't work this morning when he checked and showed surveyor logbook. V14 said he informed another staff, but they continued to use dishwasher after breakfast and lunch service.On 9/12/25 at 11:04Am, V17 (dishwasher repairman) said he serviced facility dishwasher…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-09-12 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, this facility failed to ensure the call light cord was within reach for two residents (R59 and R63) out of three residents reviewed for call light accessibility in a sample of 104. Findings include:On 9/9/25 at 10:30 AM, R59's call light cord was observed dangling behind R59's bed. When questioned, R59 stated that R59 must lower the head of her bed to a flat position and stretch left arm above head and swing arm side to side until she can reach the call light cord. On 9/9/25 at 1:05 PM, R63 was heard yelling out for help. When this surveyor entered R63's room, R63 was observed sitting in wheelchair positioned in the middle of room. R63's call light cord was observed wrapped in circular patterns on R63's nightstand which was about three feet behind R63. R63's call light cord was not within reach. On 9/9/25 at 1:10 PM, V6 LPN (licensed practical nurse) was observed clipping R63's call light cord to R63's clothing at the right shoulder. On 9/9/25 at 1:20 PM, V2 DON (director of nursing) stated that R59's call light cord is not long…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-09-12 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolatedPrevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to have an appropriate diagnosis for the use of antipsychotic medications and failed to identify a specific behavior for the use of an antipsychotic medication. This failure affected one resident (R10) out of four residents reviewed for chemical restraints in a sample of 104.Findings include:Findings include:On 9/12/25 at 9:30 AM, V15 ADON (assistant director of nursing) stated that R10 is receiving Seroquel for agitation. When questioned if a resident is receiving psychotropic medication should there be a diagnosis and reason why medication is needed, V15 responded R10 is on hospice care and V15 can call the outside hospice company to see if their physician would like to add a diagnosis. When questioned if diagnosis should be determined before initiating a psychotropic medication, V15 did not respond.On 9/12/25 at 10:00 AM, when questioned if a dementia diagnosis is an appropriate diagnosis for a resident to receive a psychotropic medication, V2 DON (director of nursing) responded that she does not have anything to do with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-12 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to follow their smoking at risk program policy and develop an at risk plan of care. This affects one of three (R56) residents reviewed for safe smoking care plan interventions. During survey tour from on 9/9/25 between hour of 11:17am -11:39am, R56 was observed with a cigarette lighter. R56 said it was his lighter for his cigarettes.9/9/25 V2 (Director of Nursing) said residents should not have cigarette lighters in their possession, it's the facility policy. V2 made aware R56 was observed with a cigarette lighter.9/12/25 at 12:27pm V2 (Director of Nursing) stated her expectation is the staff conduct and complete an accurate assessment of the residents. V2 said care plan are individualized, and the assessments drives the plan of care is developed for the residents. V2 said R56 does smoke. V2 said R56 care should have been updated accurately; to reflect he is at risk smoker.9/12/25 at 1:26pm V6 (LPN) said she only have two residents on the unit…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-12 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to successfully implement interventions to prevent resident (R17) from losing weight. This failure resulted in the resident experiencing a significant weight loss of 6 percent in one month and a significant weight loss of 11.3 percent within six months for one of seven reviewed for nutrition.Findings include:R17 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of type II diabetes, hypertension, anemia, severe protein caloric malnutrition, blindness category four to left and right eye.R17's weights documents: 9/5/25 65.2 pounds; 8/27/25 65 pounds; 8/20/25 66.6 pounds; 8/5/25 62.8 pounds; 7/3/25 66.8 pounds, 6/4/25 66.8 pounds, 5/28/25 66.8; 5/6/25 65 pounds, 3/5/25 70.2 pounds; 2/7/25 70.8pounds; 1/7/25 69 pounds and 12/6/24 71.4 pounds.R17's plan of care dated 6/7/24 documents: R17 receives a regular diet with thin liquids which I consume usually with a poor appetite. The resident may be at risk for weight loss related to: adjustment to new…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-09-12 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to have an appropriate diagnosis for the use of antipsychotic medications, failed to identify a specific behavior for the use of an antipsychotic medication. This failure affected one resident (R10) out of four reviewed for unnecessary medications in a sample of 104. Findings include:On 9/12/25 at 9:30 AM, V15 ADON (assistant director of nursing) stated that R10 is receiving Seroquel for agitation. When questioned if a resident is receiving psychotropic medication should there be a diagnosis and reason why medication is needed, V15 responded R10 is on hospice care and V15 can call the outside hospice company to see if their physician would like to add a diagnosis. When questioned if diagnosis should be determined before initiating a psychotropic medication, V15 did not respond. On 9/12/25 at 10:00 AM, when questioned if a dementia diagnosis is an appropriate diagnosis for a resident to receive a psychotropic medication, V2 DON (director of nursing) responded that she does not have anything to do with psychotropic…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-09-12 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolatedProvide or obtain dental services for each resident.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to set up a dental referral/appointment for one resident (R62) who required a tooth extraction for one of one reviewed for dental services.Findings include:R62 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of type II diabetes, dementia, hypertension, epilepsy, anxiety and weakness.On 9/9/25 at 10:59AM, R62 who was alert and oriented said he was having tooth pain for about week due to cracked tooth. R62 said he was supposed to see a dentist for removal but still not sure what is happening.Referral dated 9/5/25 documents: patient wants extraction of upper right premolar.On 9/12/25 at 9:48AM, V2(DON) said she was not aware of referral until she received the email on 9/11/25. V2 said she made the appointment on 9/11/25 for next week.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-12 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, V8 (nurse) failed to sanitize or wash her hand during medication administration. This affected two of three (R3, R32) residents reviewed for hand washing during medication administration. Findings Include: On 9/10/25 at 9:00am, during medication pass, V8 (nurse) administered R3's morning medications, return to the medication cart and proceed to prepare R32's morning medications without washing her hands or using hand sanitizer. V8 said she was supposed to clean her hands after she gave R3 her medication and before she prepared R32's medication. V8 said she forgot to clean her hands in between residents. V8 said she will clean her hands now. On 9/12/25 at 12:30pm, V2 (DON) said hand hygiene should be performed in between resident during medication administration to prevent the spread of infections. V2 said hand sanitizer or soap and water should be used for hand hygiene. Hand Hygiene Policy no date documents: Hand hygiene shall be performed: before contact with a resident or resident's environment.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-27 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow their abuse policy by not keeping a resident (R2) with dementia free from being hit by a cognitively intact resident (R1) for one out of four residents reviewed for physical abuse in a total sample of six. Findings include: R1 is a [AGE] year old with the following diagnosis: cirrhosis and lymphedema. R2 is a [AGE] year old with the following diagnosis: type 2 diabetes, dementia, and Alzheimer ' s disease. On 6/25/25 at 3:13PM, R1 stated R1 pushed R2 up against a wall when R2 would not stop touching R1's personal items. R1 reported R2 had a habit of drinking R1's pop and taking R1's clothing. R1 stated R1 asked R1 to stop each time R2 would do this but R2 would not stop due to being confused. R1 reported telling the staff about this behavior but staff did nothing to help R1. R1 stated R1 had enough and pushed R2 against a wall and they started to hit each other in the face while wrestling. R1 reported moving to a different room when R1 got back…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-28 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision and monitoring for residents. This failure affects six (R7, R8, R9, R10, R11, R12) out of twelve residents reviewed for supervision and monitoring. Findings include: On 04/26/2025, at 8:41 AM, R7 observed sitting in a wheelchair inside of the first-floor 100-unit dining room unsupervised and unattended. On 04/26/2025, at 8:57 AM, V7 (CNA) walked inside of the 100-unit dining room and stated she is responsible for caring for R7 today. V7 stated R7 should be monitored and supervised while sitting in the dining room but V7 can't watch everybody. V7 stated if residents are left unsupervised and no one is monitoring the residents, then residents could potentially fall or choke while eating. On 04/26/2025, at 1:17 PM, R8, R9, R10, R11, and R12 observed sitting inside of the first floor 300-unit dining room unsupervised and unattended. R8, R9, and R11 were sitting in wheelchairs. On 04/26/2025, at 1:18 PM, V2 (Director of Nursing/DON) walked inside the 300-unit dining room and walked…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-27 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews the facility failed to follow their policies for care planning and fall prevention by not ensuring care plans were developed based on assessments and individual needs; by not reviewing and updating care plans for appropriateness; and by not ensuring adequate personalized interventions were identified. This failure applied to two of four residents (R3 and R5) reviewed for care planning. Findings include: 1. R3 is a [AGE] year-old male with a diagnoses history of COPD, Heart Failure, Unspecified Convulsions, and Alcohol Abuse who was admitted to the facility 08/14/2024. R3's Fall Risk assessment dated [DATE] documents he is at high risk for falls. R3's Fall Risk Assessments dated 08/20/2024, 11/12/2024, and 12/29/2024 document his fall risk factors include diuretic medication, antiseizure medication, antihypertensive medication, psychotropic medication; occasional - frequent incontinence, inability to independently stand, requires hands on assistance to move from place to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-27 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews the facility failed to follow their policy and procedures for hydration by not ensuring a nutrition assessment was completed, not ensuring a hydration care plan was developed or interventions implemented, and not notifying the physician of abnormal labs related to hydration for a newly admitted resident assessed to be at risk for dehydration. This failure applied to one of four residents (R5) reviewed for hydration. Findings include: R5 is a [AGE] year-old male with a diagnoses history of Quadriplegia, Heart Failure, End Stage Renal Disease, Chronic Kidney Disease, Dependence on Renal Dialysis, Urinary Tract Infection, Metabolic Encephalopathy, Partial Paralysis following Stroke, and Dehydration (02/15/2025) who was admitted to the facility 01/31/2025. R5's Current Care Plan initiated 02/17/2025 documents he is at possible risk for dehydration with signs and symptoms related to a history of dehydration with interventions including: Encourage resident to drink all fluids…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-11 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to protect a resident with severe cognitive impaired from physical abuse and failed to develop care plan interventions in preventing abuse for two (R1 and R2) of four residents reviewed for abuse. Findings include: R1 is a [AGE] year old, male, admitted in the facility on 04/15/24 with diagnoses of Alzheimer's Disease, Unspecified; Dementia in Other Diseases Classified Elsewhere, Unspecified Severity, without Behavioral Disturbance, Psychotic Disturbance, Mood disturbance and Anxiety. MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 01/06/25 documented R1's BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 5 which means severe cognitive impairment. According to incident report dated 01/13/25, around 1:45PM, R2 was sitting at his own lunch table by himself when he suddenly jumped up and reached for R1's face with his fork in his hand. R1 had been sitting eating his lunch at his own lunch table which was located on the right side of R2. R1 and R2 were…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-01-15 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to replace a broken domestic water heater that provide hot water to resident's bathroom sinks and shower room. This affected eight of eight residents (R3-R6, R8-R11) reviewed for hot water and homelike conditions. Finding Includes: On 1/9/25 at 10:50am, V3 (maintenance director) said, We had an issues with the hot water for a few days. We have two hot water tanks that supply domestic water/ water to the resident's room and the three compartment sink in the kitchen. One of the two water tanks is broken. The other functioning water tank is having a work load stain. On 1/9/25 at 10:54am, V3 tested the water temperature from R8's - R11's bathroom sink after letting it run for 20- 30 seconds the water temped at 77 degrees F for all the sinks. R8-R11's bathroom sink water was cold to touch. R9 who was assessed to be alert and oriented to person, place and time, said her water has been cold for a while. R9 was informed the pilot light went out on the water heater. V3 said the water temperature should be 105 degree F to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-13 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record the facility failed to follow the plan of care for a dependent resident and ensure to provide two persons assist with transfer using mechanical lift for 1 of 1 resident (R2). R2 transferred using mechanical lift, R2 was subsequently observed with bruise over left eyebrow and swelling to right jaw. R2 was sent to hospital evaluation and diagnosed forehead contusion. Findings include: R2 face sheet shows R2 is a [AGE] year-old female, diagnosis of unspecified dementia, Alzheimer's disease, hypertension, heart disease, heart failure, presence of cardiac pacemaker, COPD, chronic kidney disease. R2 MDS dated [DATE] notes section C for cognition notes a score of 05 (cognitive impairment) section GG for functional status notes chair to bed transfer R2 is dependent, helper does all the effort. 12/10/24 at 12:59pm R2 observed awake, and alert. R2 observed to follow simple direction from V12 (CNA- certified Nursing Assistant). R2 was unable to interviewed by surveyor. R2 emergency room…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-13 · tag F0700 — isolatedTry different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the bed rails/side rails were in use and in the up position for one of three residents (R1). R1 hit her right eye on the bedrail. R1 observed with discoloration to right eye and redden sclera. This affects R1 reviewed for bedrail use. Findings include: R1 [NAME] data set dated [DATE] section C shows BIMS score of 15 (cognitively intact). Facility final report dated 12/10/24 notes, in part, resident was observed by staff with discoloration to the right eye and noted swelling. Small blood clot in the right eye. The resident stated she didn't fall, no one hit her, but stated she puts a mask on because her roommate was coughing a lot. The resident said she was sleeping on her right-side rail with the mask on her face and was rubbing her eye because it was itching, but no pain at the right eye. All responsible parties made aware. Resident son, Medical Doctor aware. Orders noted and carried out. Summary of investigative findings: resident received…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-31 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow their abuse policy by not immediately reporting an allegation of staff to resident physical abuse to the administrator and failing to report to the state agency within 2 hours for one of three (R1) residents reviewed for abuse. Findings include: R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, major depressive disorder, and type II diabetes. R1 has a brief interview for mental status score of 12/15 which indicates cognitively intact. On 10/29/24 at 2:20PM, V3 (Nurse) said V4 (NP) reported to her on 10/28/24, that R1 had said when someone was cleaning, someone could have hit her eye. V3 said she informed the V2(DON) prior to leaving her shift at 300pm about concern. On 10/29/24 at 2:35pm, V4 (NP) said R1 saw her in the hallway and R1 mentioned that there was a possible situation with the person that was cleaning up the room but unclear what happened. R1 reported they hurt her but not sure where. V4 said…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-10-24 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespreadProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to always have sufficient staff available to provide nursing services to meet the residents' needs in the facility. This has a potential to affect 105 residents currently residing in the facility. Findings include: On 10/21/2024 at 10:00 AM Surveyor was provided census showing 105 residents residing in the facility at this time. On 10/22/2024 at 10:28 AM Surveyor met with residents during resident council meeting where R7 said, There is long response time to call lights on the second and night shift. They (staff) come when they want to come. On 10/22/2024 at 11:40 AM Surveyor inspected unit 300, no staff was present in the nursing station or in the hallways. Surveyor noticed ongoing call light at 11:40 AM without response. Surveyor prompted V25 (Certified Nurse Assistant) at 12:00 PM to answer the call light. On 10/22/2024 at 11:50 AM Surveyor interviewed V25 (Certified Nurse Assistant) who said in summary, I feel like we don't have enough staff to monitor residents adequately. My assignments usually contain…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-24 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — patternDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify responsible parties and perform comprehensive assessment for a resident with an injury of unknown origin for one (R84) of two reviewed for abuse in the sample of 42. Findings include: R84 is a [AGE] year old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis including but not limited to chronic kidney disease, stage 3; Cerebral Infarction; Unspecified Dementia; and Cognitive Communication Deficit. According to R84's MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment dated [DATE], under section C, R84 has BIMS (Brief Minimum Data Set) score of 5 indicating severely impaired cognition. On 10/22/24 at 03:31 PM Surveyor interviewed V27 (Licensed Practical Nurse) who said in summary, I worked a day shift on 10/11/2024. V26 (CNA) reported to me that R84 has a black eye. I looked at R84, noticed the black eye (don't remember) which one. I checked her vital signs but didn't do any other assessment. I asked R84 what happened, but she wasn't able to tell me, R84 is…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-10-24 · tag F0943 — patternGive their staff education on dementia care, and what abuse, neglect, and exploitation are; and how to report abuse, neglect, and exploitation.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff was provided adequate abuse prevention education. This failure has a potential to affect 63 residents in the facility. Findings include: On 10/21/2024 at 10:00 AM Surveyor was provided census showing 36 residents residing in the unit 200 and 27 residents residing in the unit 300. Total residents for unit 200 and unit 300 is 63. 10/22/24 03:31 PM Surveyor interviewed V27 (Licensed Practical Nurse) who said in summary, I worked a day shift on 10/11/2024. V26 (CNA) reported to me that R84 has a black eye. I looked at R84, noticed the black eye (don't remember) which one. I checked her vital signs but didn't do any other assessment. I asked R84 what happened, but she wasn't able to tell me, R84 is confused. It looked like a fresh bruise. I didn't receive information about R84's injury in a hand off report and there was no progress note. I didn't notify the family or doctor. I created the progress note. Later on, V2 (DON) told me that, in similar case in the future, I should notify V2 (DON) and I received…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-24 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to report alleged abuse to the state regulatory agency within timely manner for one (R84) of two residents reviewed for abuse in the sample of 42. Findings include: R84 is a [AGE] year old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis including but not limited to chronic kidney disease, stage 3; Cerebral Infarction; Unspecified Dementia; and Cognitive Communication Deficit. According to R84's MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment dated [DATE], under section C, R84 has BIMS (Brief Minimum Data Set) score of 5 indicating severely impaired cognition. On 10/22/24 at 03:31 PM Surveyor interviewed V27 (Licensed Practical Nurse) who said in summary, I worked a day shift on 10/11/2024. V26 (CNA) reported to me that R84 has a black eye. I looked at R84, noticed the black eye (don't remember) which one. I checked her vital signs but didn't do any other assessment. I asked R84 what happened, but she wasn't able to tell me, R84 is confused. It looked like a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-24 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to thoroughly investigate alleged abuse for one (R84) of two residents reviewed for abuse in the sample of 42. Findings include: R84 is a [AGE] year old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis including but not limited to chronic kidney disease, stage 3; Cerebral Infarction; Unspecified Dementia; and Cognitive Communication Deficit. According to R84's MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment dated [DATE], under section C, R84 has BIMS (Brief Minimum Data Set) score of 5 indicating severely impaired cognition. On 10/22/2024 between 11:40 AM and 11:42 AM in separate interviews, R32 and R48 denied being interviewed in relation to the incident involving R84 prior to the surveyor's interview. R32 resides in the room that was adjacent to R84 and R48 resides in the room that was immediately across form R84's room around the time of the incident. On 10/22/24 at 03:31 PM Surveyor interviewed V27 (Licensed Practical Nurse) who said in summary, I worked a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-24 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow physician orders and failed to follow their policy for restorative programs by failing to obtain a physician order for a restorative device for 1 (R16) resident and failed to apply a splint/brace, or restorative device to prevent further contracture formation for 2 residents (R16 and R80) out of 3 residents reviewed for limited range of motion and rehabilitation. Findings include: 1. R80 is [AGE] years of age. Current diagnoses include but are not limited to Hemiplegia and hemiparesis following Cerebrovascular Disease Affecting Right Dominant Side. R80's MDS Minimum Data Set (Comprehensive Assessment) Section C Cognitive Status dated 10/09/2024 indicates a brief interview for mental status score of 13 out of 15. A score of 13-15 indicates no cognitive impairment. On 10/21/24 at 10:44 AM, R80 was alert and oriented and seated in her wheelchair in her room. R80 has limited range of motion to the right arm. R80 wasn't wearing a splint…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-24 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to monitor and prevent a cognitively impaired resident from sustaining an injury for one (R84) of two residents reviewed for accidents in the sample of 42. Findings include: R84 is a [AGE] year old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis including but not limited to chronic kidney disease, stage 3; Cerebral Infarction; Unspecified Dementia; and Cognitive Communication Deficit. According to R84's MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment dated [DATE], under section C, R84 has BIMS (Brief Minimum Data Set) score of 5 indicating severely impaired cognition. Absent are any care plans prior the incident (10/11/2024) to show R84 has a history of behavior related to bending over to take off shoes that would put her at risk to hit her face on the surface of the table. On 10/21/24 at 10:59 AM R84 observed with hematoma under left eye. Assigned nurse and CNA not aware how R84 obtained the injury. On 10/21/24 at 01:11 PM Surveyor interviewed V3 (Assistant…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-24 · tag F0847 — isolatedInform resident or representatives choice to enter into binding arbitration agreement and right to refuse.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide an arbitration agreement to a resident/representative that provided 30 days after signing to rescind the agreement. This failure applies to 1 (R23) resident of 1 reviewed for arbitration agreements. Findings include: R23 is [AGE] years of age. Current diagnoses include but are not limited to Cerebral Infarction. R23 has a POA Power of Attorney in place due to her current cognition to make decisions on her behalf. Findings include: On 10/22/24 at 01:30 PM, R23's arbitration agreement dated 11/11/2022 was reviewed which indicates: This agreement may be cancelled by any signatory within seven (7) days of its execution. Said cancellation must be delivered to the facility in writing. On 10/22/24 at 01:34 PM, interview with V11 Family Member regarding R23's arbitration agreement cancellation within seven (7) days of its execution signed on 11/11/2022. V11 said, I can't say I'm familiar with what it said. On 10/24/24 at 09:17 AM, V1 was inquired of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-28 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews the facility failed to follow their policy and procedures for fall prevention by not using all possible methods for identifying risk factors for falls, not implementing personalized and effective interventions, not ensuring new interventions were implemented with each fall, and not providing adequate supervision for residents at risk for falls. This failure applies to two of five residents (R1 and R4) reviewed for falls. Findings include: 1. R1 is a [AGE] year-old female with a diagnoses history of Paranoid Schizophrenia, COPD, Schizoaffective Disorder, Bipolar Disorder, Recurrent Severe Major Depressive Disorder, and Lymphedema who was admitted to the facility 09/19/2023. R1's Risk Management Fall Incident Report dated 09/08/2024 documents she was observed sitting on her bathroom floor after an unwitnessed fall and reported when the incident occurred, she was self-toileting. R1's current care plan initiated 12/18/2023 documents she is at risk for falls related to requiring…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-05 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and records reviewed the facility failed to provide incontinence care at every 2 hours. This affected one of three R1 residents reviewed for incontinence care. Findings include: R1's diagnosis include but not limited to Hemiplegia and Hemiparesis Following Cerebral Infarction, Seizures, Diabetes, Hypertension, Atrial Fibrillation, Aphasia, Weakness, Major Depressive Disorder. On 5/28/24 at 10:35AM R1 was in the dining room since approximately 10:25AM. At 11:33AM R1 was observed leaving the dining room by self-propelling in her wheelchair. R1 sat in the hall across from the nurses' station. At 11:51AM staff observed to return R1 to the dining room. On 5/28/24 surveyor remained in the dining room observing R1. At 12:35PM R1 was feeding herself lunch. At 1:05PM R1 was still in the dining room. R1 had not been checked or assisted with toileting. The surveyor ended direct observation of R1 in the dining room at 2:10PM. R1 had not been seen checked or toileted since observation began…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-05 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and records reviewed the facility failed to carry out physician orders to include dietary changes and a doppler study. This affected three of three residents (R1, R7, and R3) reviewed for physician orders. The findings include: 1.R1's diagnosis include but not limited to Hemiplegia and Hemiparesis Following Cerebral Infarction, Seizures, Diabetes, Hypertension, Atrial Fibrillation, Aphasia, Weakness, Major Depressive Disorder. R1's cognitive patterns assessment dated [DATE] documents she has difficulty in new situations only related to daily decision making. On 5/28/24 at 12:20PM V1, Dietary Manager, said mechanical and ground diets look like ground meat. V1 pointed to R10's meat served on her dish. The surveyor observed it looks like ground meat with gravy on it. R1 has Salisbury steak in front of her, on her plate, not cut up. R1 was feeding herself the meal. At 12:30PM V3, Medical Records, observed cutting up Salisbury steak for R1. At 12:35PM V10, Director of Nursing, the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-05 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and records reviewed the facility failed to ensure one resident with a diagnosis of Dementia, remained free of antipsychotic medication without an appropriate diagnosis. This affects one of three residents (R2) reviewed for unnecessary medication. The findings include: R2 has diagnosis including but not limited to Encephalopathy, Malignant Neoplasm, Altered Mental Status, Type 2 Diabetes, Chron's Disease, Unspecified Dementia, Bipolar Disorder, Depression, and anxiety disorder. On 5/29/24 at 1:18PM V6, RN, said R2 can ambulate independently with a walker. V6 said R2 is confused, and we need to redirect her. V6 said R2 does not have violent behaviors, she needs redirection, has confusion and is forgetful. V6 said to give psychotropic medications we must have verbal and written consent in place. V6 said the Assistant Director of Nursing or Director of Nursing is responsible to give consent unless the doctor comes after hours and orders the medications. V6 said, I assume the consent is obtained,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-18 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolatedProtect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and records reviewed the facility failed to protect one resident (R1) from being exploited by a staff person who offered her personal care services and the costs for that care and then discharged R1 into her care. This affected one of three (R1) residents reviewed for exploitation. This failure resulted in R1 being discharged to the care of V1 (social worker) without consent or the family's knowledge. The findings include: R1 is [AGE] years old with diagnosis including, but not limited to Congestive Heart Failure, Metabolic Encephalopathy, Pleural Effusion, Hypertension, Cerebral Infarction, Diabetes, Need for Assistance with Personal Care, Weakness, Dementia and History of Transient Ischemic Attack. R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged on 12/21/23. Records indicated R1 left the faciity on [DATE]. On 12/13/23 R1's Cognitive Assessment score is 10, moderately impaired and on a Cognitive Assessment from 12/21/23 R1 is described to have memory problems and difficulties making…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-18 · tag F0661 — isolatedEnsure necessary information is communicated to the resident, and receiving health care provider at the time of a planned discharge.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and records reviewed the facility failed to follow their practice and obtain a signature to ensure resident was signed out to the responsible person upon discharge. This affected one of three residents (R1) reviewed for discharge summary. This failure resulted in R1 being discharged to the facility social worker (V1) instead of the family. Findings include: R1 is [AGE] years old with diagnosis including, but not limited to Congestive Heart Failure, Metabolic Encephalopathy, Pleural Effusion, Hypertension, Cerebral Infarction, Diabetes, Need for Assistance with Personal Care, Weakness, Dementia and History of Transient Ischemic Attack. On 1/6/24 at 10:39AM V4, R1's family, said V1, Former Social Service Director, took my dad from the facility. V4 said V5, R1's family, called V4 and told V4, V5 had taken R1 to dinner and R1 told V5 that they were going to take R1 out of the facility, and R1 did not want to go. V4 said V5 told her at 2:00PM on 12/21/23, R1 called V5 and said he was in a van on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-18 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident was safely discharged into the community with a family member by allowing facility staff V1 (social service) to discharge the resident (R1) into her private care. This affected one of three residents R1 reviewed for safe discharge. This failure resulted in R1 being discharged into care of V1 without the facility's or family's knowledge. The findings include: R1 is [AGE] years old with diagnosis including, but not limited to Congestive Heart Failure, Metabolic Encephalopathy, Pleural Effusion, Hypertension, Cerebral Infarction, Diabetes, Need for Assistance with Personal Care, Weakness, Dementia and History of Transient Ischemic Attack. R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged on 12/21/23. R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] from the hospital. R1 was discharged home on [DATE] and returned 11/17/23 to the facility from home due to concerns related to his medication. Records indicated R1 left the faciity on [DATE].…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-12-15 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, intervention, and record review the facility failed to label medications with names, opened and use by dates; store medications that require refrigeration in the refrigerator, and maintain the correct count for Schedule II medications in two of two medication carts. This failure has the potential to affect 11 residents reviewed for medication storage in the sample of 22. Findings include: On [DATE] at 3:10 PM the medication cart on Unit 300 contained 18 Vancomycin 125 mg (milligram) capsules in unit dose packaging in the cart with no label. V26 (LPN-Licensed Practical Nurse) said, I don't have anybody on antibiotics. I don't know why that's here. All meds should have a label. R1 Timolol 0.5% eyedrops, open and no opened date. Lispro insulin pen opened [DATE] and expired date [DATE] written on label. Opened Insulin Aspart/Protamine Insulin mixed with no opened or use by date. Two unopened Lispro pens in the cart, not refrigerated. V26 (LPN) said, That shouldn't be on the cart. R74 Two opened…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-15 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure assistance with shaving is provided to resident who is unable to carry out the task to maintain good personal hygiene for one of two residents (R58) reviewed for activities of daily living (ADL) in a sample of 22. Findings include: On 12/13/2023 at 10:16AM during observation, R58 was observed with thick facial hair covering the side of his cheek extending to his chin area, and thick mustache. At 10:25AM, R58 was observed with V25 (Certified Nursing Assistant/CNA) with the same appearance. On 12/13/2023 at 10:25AM, V25 stated she was aware R58 had thick facial hairs but the razor in the facility is not efficient enough to be used to shave R58's facial hairs, so V25 waits for the barber to come in and ask to cut it down a little before V25 can shave it completely. On 12/14/2023 at 11:50AM, V2 (Director of Nursing) said it is expected for nursing staff to offer shave every ADL care is provided to residents, and if the razor is not efficient to be used, nursing staff should let her know. V2 said she was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-15 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to prevent deterioration of pressure ulcer upon admission and failed to follow manufacturer recommendation in using low air loss mattress to resident with stage 4 pressure ulcer. The facility also failed to update the wound care plan. This deficiency affects one (R342) of three residents in the sample of 22 reviewed for Pressure Ulcer Management. Findings include: On 12/13/23 at 12:18PM, Observed R342 lying in bed wearing disposable adult brief, on low air loss mattress with flat sheet and cloth pad over the mattress. Showed observation to V10 Wound care Nurse. V10 said R342 should only be on pads or flat sheet over the low air loss mattress, no multi layers of linen. On 12/13/23 at 12:29PM, Observed V19 Wound care Physician perform wound care with V10 Wound care Nurse and V20 CNA. V19 said R342 has stage 4 pressure ulcer that measures 15.1cm x 16cm x 2cm with undermining 6cm at 6 o'clock. 60% tissue granulation, 5% bone, 15% ligament and 20 %…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-15 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that residents with limited mobility and contractures are evaluated and provided treatment to prevent further development of contractures. This deficiency affects one (R82) of three residents in the sample of 22 reviewed for Restorative Program. Findings include: On 12/12/23 at 11:40AM, Observed R82 lying in bed with flexion contractures on right hand. Showed observation to V4 Restorative Nurse. V4 said that R82 does not use splint/brace, she does not need it. On 12/13/23 at 11:50AM, Review R82's medical records with V13 Therapy Director. V13 said that resident is screened upon admission or referral from the nursing. Screening is done to see if the resident will benefit from therapy services such as PT/OT/ST except for hospice or respite care. V4 said that R82 was screened on 6/7/23. It was recommended for her to be re-screened at later date due to inability to participate related to impaired cognition. But no follow up was done. V4…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-15 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure resident's mouth was clear and free from food residual after feeding a resident who is on aspiration precaution. This deficiency affects one (R35) of three residents in the sample of 22 reviewed for Resident safety. Findings include: On 12/12/23 at 12:45PM, V21 CNA and V22 CNA said R35 ate less than 10% for breakfast and lunch. R35 needs assistance and encouragement during meals. R35 is holding her food in her mouth or spitting it out. Both said V24 Speech Therapist fed R35 for lunch. On 12/12/23 at 12:50PM, Observed R35 sleepy in recliner chair alone in her room, leaning to left side her both legs where stuck at the space of leg rest on the right side of the recliner chair. R35's mouth was open with white colored liquid food pooling over her mouth. R35 opened her eyes when called, but nonverbal and dozing off. R35 is confused and needs total care with ADLs. R35 did not have food protector over her chest, her lunch tray was on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-15 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow physician order for oxygen dosage for one of three residents (R24) reviewed for oxygen therapy in a sample of 22. Findings include: On 12/13/2023 at 10:18AM during observation, R24 was observed with nasal cannula connected to oxygen concentrator regulated at 5 liters. During record review, order dated 11/14/2023 indicated R24's order for oxygen was at 2 liters via nasal cannula continuously. On 12/14/2023 at 11:50AM during observation with V2 (Director of Nursing), R24 was again observed with nasal cannula connected to oxygen concentrator regulated at 5 liters. On 12/14/2023 at 12:00AM during record review with V2, order dated 11/14/2023 indicated R24's order for oxygen was at 2 liters via nasal cannula continuously. V2 stated that the oxygen concentrator should be regulated at 2 liters. V2 also said she expects the nursing staff to follow the physician order for all oxygen use. R24's Order Summary Report dated 12/13/2023 indicated R24's admission dated of 10/29/2023, diagnoses not limited to chronic…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-15 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide medications as ordered for two residents (R13 and R41) of six residents reviewed for medication administration in the sample of 22. Findings include: 1. On 12/13/23 at 9:04 am R41 was scheduled to receive Keppra 500 mg. V27 (LPN-Licensed Practical Nurse) was not able to locate Keppra 500 mg in the medication cart or the convenience cabinet. R41 did not receive Keppra. On 12/13/23 at 11:00 AM V27 (LPN) said, I called R41's doctor and he didn't give any new orders. He said to give the Keppra when it gets here. I called the pharmacy, and they are going to deliver it stat (immediately). It should be here this afternoon. This surveyor asked what could result from a missed or a late dose, V27 said she could have a seizure. On 12/14/23 at 10:21 AM V28 (LPN) said, I got report that the Keppra was on order. I should have given it when it came in. The meds arrived about 10:00 PM. I didn't check the meds. It was pretty busy last night. I didn't give the Keppra. I should have marked why it wasn't given but I…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-15 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow it policy on infection control by ensuring nebulizer mask was properly stored in a plastic bag and not left open to air. The facility also failed to ensure that isolation gown was removed when coming out of an isolation room. This failure affected two of two residents (R25 and R29) observed for infection control in a sample of 22. Findings include: 1. On 12/12/2023 between 11:35AM to 11:45AM during observation, V14 (Lab Technician) was observed coming out of R25's room after drawing blood who is on contact precautions for MDRO (Multiple Drug Resistance Organism) of urine without removing any of her PPE (Personal Protective Equipment) gown, gloves, and mask. V14 removed her gloves outside of the room, walked to another room while holding the specimen in her hand, then removed her gown and put it in her bag. A sign outside the door of read, Contact/Droplet Precautions and How to safely remove PPR example 1 and 2. On 12/12/23 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-06 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — isolatedKeep all essential equipment working safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and records review the facility did not provide scheduled maintenance to essential equipment according to manufacturer's recommendations. This failure contributed to one of the mechanical lifts not being available to provide the necessary assistance to R1 (1 of three residents interviewed R1,R7 and R8) , so that he could attend to his daily routine including dialysis. R1 is a [AGE] year-old male whose diagnosis includes diabetes mellitus due to underlying condition with chronic kidney disease, acute (congestive) systolic heart failure, end stage renal disease, malignant neoplasm of right kidney, acute kidney failure, unspecified, dependence on renal dialysis, encounter for orthopedic aftercare following surgical amputation, encounter for change or removal of surgical wound dressing. Weakness, unspecified, unsteadiness on feet, unspecified osteoarthritis, unspecified site. On 11/03/23 at 11:30 AM surveyor toured the facility and encounter V3 (maintenance director) in the hallway…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$305,710 in federal fines across 6 penalties. 2 Medicare payment denials on record.
- $123,940 — penalty dated 2026-02-08
- $58,200 — penalty dated 2025-12-18
- $16,585 — penalty dated 2025-09-12
- $20,470 — penalty dated 2025-02-27
- $83,097 — penalty dated 2024-10-24
- $3,418 — penalty dated 2024-02-06
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2025-10-04 for 3 days
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-12-05 for 82 days
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to ICARE CONSULTING SERVICES — 7 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1 of 5 | 1.3 | -0.3 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 1 of 5 | 1.4 | -0.4 vs chain |
| Staffing | 1 of 5 | 1.4 | -0.4 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 1 of 5 | 2.3 | -1.3 vs chain |
The other 6 homes this chain runs (chain average 1.3★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CHANKIN, KEVIN | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 7% | since 02/01/2018 |
| LEVOVITZ, YERUCHOM | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | 41% | since 02/01/2018 |
| WEBSTER, SHIMON | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | 44% | since 02/01/2018 |
| CIBC BANK USA | Organization | 5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTEREST | — | since 10/30/2019 |
| AMICO, JULIE | Individual | W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE | — | since 02/01/2018 |
| JUNIOUS LYONS, MICHELE | Individual | W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE | — | since 02/01/2018 |
| POINTE MANAGEMENT LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 12/20/2020 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 9 rows in the source record cover these 7 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $2.5M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 27% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in IL
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Illinois Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 145927. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-09-12, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.