No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Beaumont Rehabilitation And Healthcare Center

1345 N Madison Ave, Anderson, IN 46011 · Non profit - Corporation · 200 certified beds · (765) 644-2888 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (765) 644-2888 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citations — no harm found (F0609, F0610) — most recent Jul 2024Resident-funds citation (F0569)Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0744)1 actual-harm citation1 immediate-jeopardy citation CMS recorded as corrected before the inspection ended (past non-compliance)$14,901 in federal fines
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

In its favor
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0569)
  • it has 1 actual-harm citation
  • inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (41) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $14,901 in federal fines (most recent 2025-08-01)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
  • about 23% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 4 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
1515 N Madison Ave · (765) 298-1622 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
1845 N Scatterfield Rd · (765) 649-2477 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
3 Jackson St · (765) 393-0205 · Call to confirm hours
Park
N Madison Ave · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased1.1%11.0%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight6.5%5.5%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.2%0.4%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%1.1%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms8.0%25.2%6.5%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury1.2%3.9%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened4.8%11.9%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication21.8%23.5%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine95.5%95.4%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers1.4%3.6%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control24.8%23.3%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table19.5%13.6%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.0%1.2%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine44.1%79.0%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission18.5%22.2%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit13.9%10.8%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.211.611.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.201.441.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

53.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 60 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

53.9%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.8%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
0.20U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.09hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.07hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.04hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.20 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 23% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 12% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF53.9%CMS range 41.2–67.051.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.8%CMS range 7.8–15.410.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization8.0%CMS range 4.6–16.17.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.361.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.19
RN hours/ resident / day
1.00
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.92
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.11
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.13
RN hoursweekends
53.4%
Total nursing turnover
45.5%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 200 beds and averages 127.6 residents a day — about 64% occupied, or roughly 72 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.11 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.19 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.92 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.94 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.18 on weekdays — 8% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.22 to 0.13 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 53% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

7
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-09-19)
13
at the previous standard inspection (2024-07-02)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

41 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 29 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-08-01 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to implement interventions of two staff for bed mobility for a dependent resident (Resident B) to prevent a fall from bed when the resident rolled from the bed during care and struck their head on a nightstand, resulting in a major head injury and hospitalization in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU). (Resident B) This deficient practice was corrected on 7/29/25, prior to the start of the survey, and was therefore past noncompliance. Findings include:Resident B's clinical record was reviewed on 7/30/2025 at 10:00 a.m. Diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), type 2 diabetes, dementia, stage 2 chronic kidney disease, atherosclerotic heart disease, anxiety, depressive disorder, hydrocephalus (buildup of fluid in brain) and aortocoronary bypass. Resident B admitted to the facility on [DATE] from another skilled facility.Review of the admission observation, dated 7/17/2025, indicated the resident required partial to moderate assistance for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Actual harm · G2023-12-28 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to effectively monitor and treat pain for a resident with severe cognitive impairment with a healing dislocated and fractured left shoulder for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for pain. (Resident F) This resulted in Resident F having impaired mobility and poor quality of life as evidenced by not leaving his bed per his usual routine. Finding includes: During an observation on 12/27/23 at 12:59 p.m., Resident F was lying in bed with the head of the bed elevated, positioned on his back, unclothed. His eyes were open and he was picking at his incontinent brief with his right hand. His legs were making small movements against the sheets of the bed. During an observation on 12/27/23 at 4:00 p.m., the resident was lying flat in bed, positioned on his back with a hospital gown draped over his right arm. His head was back, his mouth was open, and he was grimacing. He was making small movements with his right arm. During an observation on 12/28/23 at 11:50 a.m., accompanied by QMA 2, Resident F was observed lying flat in bed,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-06-17 · tag F0569 — isolated
    Notify each resident of certain balances and convey resident funds upon discharge, eviction, or death.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Resident Personal Funds Accounts were closed within 30 days of resident's discharge and the funds balances were returned at that time for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for management of resident funds (Residents F and J). Findings include:Confidential interviews were conducted during the survey. During a confidential interview, the following concerns were expressed regarding Resident Personal Funds management: A resident's Resident Personal Funds Account was not closed within 30 days of discharge. Both the resident and their new facility contacted the facility and did not receive assistance in receiving the resident's remaining funds within 30 days of the resident's discharge. The funds were returned after approximately 60 days. The resident did not have access to their money for that period of time. During an interview on 6/17/26 at 11:17 a.m., the Corporate Senior Business Office Manager indicated the facility did not have a written policy or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-24 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure immediate, individualized fall interventions were developed to mitigate the risk for further falls for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for accidents. (Resident C and E)Findings include: 1.Resident C's clinical record was reviewed on 4/22/26 at 11:03 a.m. Diagnoses included peripheral vascular disease, acquired absence of other right toe(s), other lack of coordination, weakness, unsteadiness on feet, muscle wasting and atrophy, not elsewhere classi ed, unspeci ed site, and cognitive communication de cit. A 1/23/26 quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment indicated he was cognitively intact. He used a wheelchair for mobility. He had impairments to his bilateral lower extremities. He required set up assistance for bed mobility. He required supervision or touching assistance with upper body dressing. He required partial to moderate assistance with sitting to lying. He required substantial to maximal assistance with toileting and personal hygiene, lower body dressing, footwear, lying to sitting, sitting to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-24 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident was not administered medication to increase blood pressure when their blood pressure reading was above physician ordered parameters for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for physician orders. (Resident D) Finding includes: Resident E's clinical record was reviewed on 4/22/26 at 11:00 am. Diagnoses included hypertension (high blood pressure), atrial fibrillation (irregular heartbeat), and end stage renal (kidney) disease.Current orders included midodrine (increases blood pressure) 10 milligrams, by mouth, two times a day every Monday, Wednesday, and Friday for blood pressure. Hold if systolic (top number) blood pressure is greater than 130 (2/20/26).The clinical record indicated the following:On 2/27/26 the resident's blood pressure was 139/73 millimeters (mm) Hg (mercury). Midodrine was administered.On 3/4/26 the resident's blood pressure was 138/82 mm Hg. Midodrine was administered.On 3/11/26 the resident's blood pressure was 169/93 mm Hg. Midodrine was administered.On 3/25/26 the resident's blood pressure was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-24 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure implemented fall interventions were in place to mitigate risk for further falls for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for falls. (Resident E) Finding includes: Resident E's clinical record was reviewed on 4/22/26 at 10:18 a.m. Diagnoses included end stage renal disease, traumatic brain injury, cerebral infarction (stroke), unsteadiness on feet, weakness, and lack of coordination.A 3/31/26 quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment indicated Resident E's cognitive status was moderately impaired. He used a wheelchair for mobility. He required substantial to maximal assistance with toileting hygiene, lower body dressing, footwear, personal hygiene, rolling left and right, sitting to standing, and chair or bed to chair transfer.A current fall care plan, revised on 9/15/25, indicated Resident E was at risk for impaired safety, injury, and falls related to a cerebral infarct, traumatic brain injury, weakness, history of falls, mobility, and medications. Interventions included the following: a call for assistance…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-24 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to complete physician ordered pre-dialysis assessments for 1 of 2 residents (Resident E) and physician ordered post-dialysis assessments for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for dialysis. (Residents D & E) Findings include:1.Resident E's clinical record was reviewed on 4/22/26 at 10:18 a.m. Diagnosis included end stage renal disease with dependence on renal dialysis, acquired absence of a kidney, and type 2 diabetes mellitus with diabetic chronic kidney disease.Current physician orders included monitor left chest dialysis access site for infection daily, obtain vital signs, blood pressure and pulse, and monitor pre and post dialysis for: altered mental status, lethargy, edema, chest pain, shortness of breath, abdominal pain, nausea, vomiting, unusual itching, bleeding at site, bruises, abnormal muscle cramps, redness, swelling, tenderness, or signs of infection at dialysis site every shift on Mondays, Wednesdays, and Fridays, apixaban 5 milligram tablet (blood thinner) to be administered orally twice a day, and check site of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-24 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the sanitary storage of food for resident use in refrigerators on the nursing units for 2 of 3 nursing unit refrigerators observed. (Intermediate and Arcadia)Findings include:During an observation of the nursing unit's refrigerators, accompanied by the Dietary Manager, on 4/22/26 at 12:53 p.m., the following was observed: 1.On the Intermediate unit, a small refrigerator was located in the nurses' station. The refrigerator contained a packaged deli sandwich, dated 4/14/26, a frozen entree, an unopened bottle of strawberry soda, an unopened strawberry/banana Greek yogurt, four open partial bottles of waters, an open partial bottle of mandarin orange water, and an undated foam container with cabbage, sausage, corn bread, and an unidenti able yellow substance. The freezer section of the refrigerator contained a sticky, soft, ice cream sandwich, two frozen nutritional supplements, and an uncovered Dairy Queen cup that was stuck to the shelf of the freezer. LPN 33 indicated that the refrigerator was for the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-24 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, observation and record review, the facility failed to ensure accurate documentation was reflected in a resident's clinical records for 2 of 2 records reviewed for dialysis. (Resident D and E) Findings include:1.Resident E's clinical record was reviewed on 4/22/26 at 10:18 a.m. Diagnosis included end stage renal disease with dependence on renal dialysis, acquired absence of a kidney, and type 2 diabetes mellitus with diabetic chronic kidney disease.A dialysis pre/post evaluation, dated 1/28/26 at 3:15 p.m., indicated Resident E had a dialysis access location in his left upper extremity.A dialysis pre/post evaluation dated 2/2/26 at 5:52 a.m., indicated Resident E had a dialysis access location in his left arm.A dialysis pre/post evaluation dated 3/25/26 at 5:14 a.m., indicated Resident E had a dialysis access location in his left chest and the access site had a bruit and thrill.During an interview, on 4/23/26 at 9:45 a.m., Resident E indicated his dialysis access site was in his left upper chest During an interview, on 4/23/26 at 4:50 p.m., Resident E indicated he…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-03-31 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were assisted with bathing per their preference and as scheduled for 5 of 5 residents reviewed for activities of daily living (ADLs). (Residents B, C, D, E, F) Findings include: 1.Resident B's clinical record was reviewed on 3/30/26 at 11:39 a.m. Diagnoses included paraplegia and morbid severe obesity due to excess calories.An admission MDS (Minimal Data Set) Assessment, dated 12/26/25, indicated Resident B preferred bed baths every Tuesday and Friday between 2:00 p.m. to 10:00 p.m.Review of a current care plan for ADLs, revised 3/24/26, indicated the resident preferred a bed bath every Tuesday and Friday from 2:00 p.m. to 10:00 p.m. Review of facility shower sheets and Documentation Survey Reports for January 2026 through March 2026, indicated in January 2026, the resident did not receive scheduled bed baths on the following dates: 1/6, 1/9, 1/13, 1/23, and 1/30. In February 2026, the resident did not receive scheduled bed baths on the following dates: 2/3, 2/6, 2/13, and 2/23. In March 2026, the resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-09-19 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    A. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to prepare, serve, and distribute food under safe sanitary conditions regarding food temperatures at the time of service. This deficient practice had the potential to impact 116 of 116 residents who resided in the facility.B. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure sanitation of cookware in the three-compartment sink. This deficient practice had the potential to impact 116 of 116 residents who resided in the facility.Findings include:A. During the initial kitchen tour on 9/15/25 at 10:00 a.m., the three-compartment sink was observed to have food particles in sink 1 (the wash sink), utensils in sink 2 (the rinse sink), and utensils and pans in sink 3 (the sanitizing sink). The Dietary Manager tested the sanitizing sink for the concentration of the sanitizing liquid. The test strip registered zero sanitizing agent. The Dietary Manager indicated the water was too cold and would not activate the sanitizer when it was cold. The water temperature booster had not been…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-09-19 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — pattern
    Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to develop and implement approaches to maintain a Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) program to prevent repeat deficiencies regarding Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP). Finding includes: Review of the Summary Statement of Deficiencies for the facility's last annual recertification and licensure survey, completed on 7/2/24, indicated the facility had deficiencies related to failure to follow infection control guidelines related to EBP.During an interview, on 9/19/25 at 12:41 p.m., the Administration indicated the Quality Assessment and Assurance (QAA) committee met quarterly to review current facility concerns. The QAA committee utilized an online program to assist with streamlining the process, assessing trends, and documentation of these meetings. The current nursing topics were changes in Minimum Data Set (MDS) regulations. The Administrator indicated the facility did not have any current QAPI or Performance Improvement Plans (PIP) in place for isolation procedures such as Enhanced Barrier Precautions…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 29 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2025-09-19 · tag F0628 — isolated
    Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    A. Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to notify the State Ombudsman of resident transfers to the hospital for 3 of 5 residents reviewed for hospitalization. (Resident 83, Resident 120, and Resident 44) B. Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide the transfer/discharge notification and bed hold policy to the resident/representative when the resident was discharged for 2 of 5 residents reviewed for hospitalization. (Resident 18 and Resident 44) Findings include: A1. Resident 83's clinical record was reviewed on 9/18/25 at 12:42 p.m. Diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) with acute exacerbation and acute and chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia. A 7/18/25, quarterly, Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment indicated the resident was cognitively intact. A 2/16/25, progress note indicated Resident 83 was sent out to the hospital due to shortness of breath. All necessary parties were made aware. A 2/17/25, progress note indicated the resident was admitted to the hospital for pneumonia. A 2/19/25, progress noted…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-09-19 · tag F0645 — isolated
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure timely completion of a required Level I Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) assessment for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for PASARR. (Resident 6) Findings include:Resident 6's clinical record was reviewed on 9/17/25 at 10:20 a.m. Diagnoses included hypokalemia, stage 3 chronic kidney disease, and acute kidney failure. His admission date was 8/6/25. His discharge date was 9/15/25. Review of a Level of Care Screen Outcome, dated 7/31/25, indicated short term approval for intermediate nursing care for the duration of 30 days. The end date was 8/30/25. Review of a Level I PASARR Screen Outcome, dated 7/31/25 indicated the exempted hospital discharge allowed for a 30 day duration without further PASRR evaluation. If more time was required, the nursing facility must submit a new Level 1 screen. This must be completed by or before the 30th day after admission to the nursing facility. During an interview, on 9/18/25 at 3:30 p.m., the Social Service Assistant (SSA) indicated Resident 6's current Level 1 had an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-19 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) were followed during a dressing change for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for EBP. (Resident 19)Finding includes:On 9/15/25 at 10:47 a.m. Resident 19 was seated in a wheelchair watching television while the housekeeper mopped the floor of her room. No EBP signage or personal protective equipment (PPE) cart was observed. Resident 19's record was reviewed on 9/18/25 at 1:38 p.m. Medical diagnoses included major depressive disorder, acquired deformity of left and right lower leg, and polyneuropathy (complex nerve pain). Current physician orders included, surgical site right lower extremity cleanse with normal saline or wound wash, and apply silver alginate. Apply skin protectant film to peri wound then cover with dressing and secure daily. A nurse practitioner's note, dated 9/4/25 at 9:38 a.m., indicated the resident had a wound to her right shin with slough (moist, soft, non-viable tissue) on the surface easily penetrated to the underlying bone with a Q-tip.During a wound…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-19 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide COVID-19 vaccines per the Center for Disease and Control (CDC) guidance for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for immunizations. (Resident 44)Findings includes: Resident 44's clinical record was reviewed on 9/17/25 at 1:53 p.m. Diagnoses included essential hypertension, epilepsy, and anxiety disorder. A 1/22/25, physician's order indicated Resident 44 may have all age appropriate and pertinent vaccinations. A 6/13/25, quarterly, Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment indicated Resident 44 was cognitively intact. Review of the resident's vaccinations included the following: The resident had no historical administration of the Pneumococcal vaccine. A 2/25/25, Vaccine Consent Form, indicated Resident 44 was educated and consented to the appropriate pneumococcal vaccination. The clinical record lacked further documentation of the pneumococcal vaccination. During an interview, on 9/19/25 at 11:50 a.m., LPN 18 indicated she was just recently asked to oversee the vaccination records. She was unable to locate any documentation…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-09-19 · tag F0887 — isolated
    Educate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide COVID-19 vaccines per the Center for Disease and Control (CDC) guidance for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for immunizations. (Resident 44)Findings includes: Resident 44's clinical record was reviewed on 9/17/25 at 1:53 p.m. Diagnoses included essential hypertension, epilepsy, and anxiety disorder. A 1/22/25, physician's order indicated Resident 44 may have all age appropriate and pertinent vaccinations. A 6/13/25, quarterly, Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment indicated Resident 44 was cognitively intact. Review of the resident's vaccinations included the following: The resident had a historical administration of the COVID-19 vaccination on 1/26/21 and 2/23/21. A 2/25/25, Vaccine Consent Form, indicated Resident 44 was educated and consented to the appropriate COVID-19 vaccination. The clinical record lacked further documentation of the COVID-19 vaccination. During an interview, on 9/19/25 at 11:50 a.m., LPN 18 indicated she was just recently asked to oversee the vaccination records. She indicated she was unable to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-03 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — pattern
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide current education on influenza vaccines and to obtain current influenza vaccination consents for 4 of 6 residents reviewed for immunizations. (Resident D, E, G, and H) Findings include: 1. Resident D's clinical record was reviewed on 4/2/25 at 11:53 a.m. Diagnoses included type 2 diabetes, hypertension, history of traumatic brain injury, depression, cerebral infarction, obstructive and reflux uropathy, anemia, chronic kidney disease, anxiety, and dementia. A review of the resident's immunization record indicated the influenza vaccination consent form was signed and dated on 10/10/23 and was administered on 10/1/24. Education related to the risk and benefits of the influenza vaccine was dated 8/6/21. The consent for the pneumococcal vaccine was signed and dated 10/10/23. The pneumococcal vaccine was administered on 6/26/23. The consent for the COVID -19 vaccine was signed and dated 10/10/23. The COVID-19 booster was administered on 10/28/24. 2. Resident E's clinical record was reviewed on 4/3/25 at 11:00 a.m.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-07-02 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure shift to shift narcotic reconciliation was completed for 6 of 6 carts reviewed for medication storage of 11 total medication and treatment carts. (Rehab cart, Intermediate back cart, 400 hall cart, 500 hall cart, 200 hall cart and 300 hall cart) Findings include: 1. During a medication storage observation of the 400 hall cart, accompanied by LPN 33, on 6/26/24 at 9:23 a.m., the Controlled Substances Check Form record was reviewed and the following dates lacked shift to shift reconciliation of controlled substances: In June 2024- 6/1, 6/2, 6/3, 6/4, 6/5, 6/6, 6/7, and 6/8 on all three shifts, 6/10 on evening and night shifts, 6/11 on day and evening shifts, 6/12 from 6:00 p.m.- 10:00 p.m. and night shift, 6/13 on day shift and 2:00 p.m. - 6:00 p.m., and night shift 6/17 on day shift and 2:00 p.m.- 6:00 p.m., 6/18 on evening and night shift, 6/19 on day shift, 6/21 on day shift and night shift, 6/22 on all three shifts, 6/24 on night shift, 6/25 on all three shifts. 2. During a medication storage observation of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-02 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — pattern
    Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to develop and implement approaches to correct identified deficient practices and audits to measure success of Performance Improvement Plans (PIP) as part of the Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) program. Findings include: During an interview, on 6/26/24 at 10:14 a.m., the DON indicated she had started Performance Improvement Plan (PIP) for an identified concern at the facility, such the failure of nurses to sign in and out to acknowledge reconciliation of the narcotic medication at the change of shift. She indicated the completion date for her PIP was 9/13/24. A current facility PIP guide, provided by the DON on 6/26/24 at 10:14 a.m., indicated the start date as 6/13/24 for nurses not signing in and out on the record of accepting narcotic responsibilities. The plan or tasks to be completed included a review of sign in/sign out sheets, a staff in-service, and Clean Fridays audits were to be initiated. The staff in-service was held on 6/13/24. The facility nursing staff was verbally re-educated on 6/26/24.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-02 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to resolve and respond to resident grievances in a timely manner for 3 of 3 residents reviewed for choices. (Residents 30, 33, and 81) Findings include: 1. During an interview on 6/26/24 at 3:31 p.m., Resident 30 indicated he went to dialysis at 5:30 a.m. on Mondays, Wednesdays, and Fridays each week. Sometimes dietary staff was not there before he left with transportation for his appointment. He was not served breakfast, nor packed a breakfast, to take with him to dialysis. Due to his lack of breakfast, he had spoken to a [NAME] and the current Dietary Manager (DM) week after week until approximately a month ago when he finally gave up because no one resolved his concerns. He even suggested some simple solutions such as fresh fruit like grapes and bananas. As a result, he went to dialysis without breakfast. Approximately two months ago, he spoke with the Administrator yet it was not resolved. Resident 30's clinical record was reviewed on 6/26/24 at 4:10…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-02 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to report an allegation of resident abuse to the Indiana State Department of Health (IDOH) for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for allegations of abuse. (Resident C) Finding includes: Resident C's clinical record was reviewed on 6/26/24 at 9:06 a.m. Current diagnosis included anxiety, depression, and dementia. A 4/24/24, significant change, Minimum Data Set Assessment (MDS) indicated the resident was severely cognitively impaired, wandered daily during the assessment period, and did not reject care during the assessment period. A 6/6/24 Nursing Note, signed by RN 22, indicated on 6/6/24 at 5:35 a.m.,Resident C had experienced a confusing night. The resident had been observed walking down the hall with no clothes on. RN 22 got the resident dressed Resident C was standing in their room attempting to to walk through the wall. The resident was hard to redirect, but the writer was able to get them to the side of the bed. The writer had to pull the back of the resident's pants to guide her to the bed to sit down before falling. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-02 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a safety plan (regarding 15 minute monitoring checks) to prevent resident to resident abuse for a resident with a diagnosis of dementia and a history of intrusive wandering. This deficient practice resulted in the resident being hit in the face, choked, and relocated to a new dementia unit. (Resident E) Finding includes: Review of a 6/14/24 facility reported incident indicated the following: During an resident to resident event on 6/14/24, Resident E wandered into Resident F's room and was going through Resident F's belongings. Resident F popped Resident E in the mouth several times, resulting in Resident E having a red chin and a little cut on his lip. Both resident's had dementia and resided on a secured dementia unit. On 6/14/24, following the event, the facility implemented the preventative measures of separating the residents, Social Services spoke with Resident F about not hitting, and Resident E was placed on 15- minute checks. Review of a 6/15/24 facility reported incident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-02 · tag F0638 — isolated
    Assure that each resident’s assessment is updated at least once every 3 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure timely completion of Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments every three months for 4 of 4 reviewed for timely assessment. (Residents 22, 35, 60, 73) Findings include: 1. Resident 22's clinical record was reviewed on 6/26/24 at 1:05 p.m. Current diagnosis included left sided hemiplegia following a cerebral infarction, major depressive disorder, and repeated falls. The resident had a Quarterly MDS assessment, with the Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 11/11/23 which was completed on 11/29/23. The assessment was completed 4 days late. The resident had a Quarterly MDS assessment, with the ARD of 5/10/24 which was completed on 5/27/24. The assessment was completed 3 days late. 2. Resident 35's clinical record was reviewed on 6/28/24 at 10:05 a.m. Current diagnosis included hypertension, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and bipolar disorder. The resident had a Quarterly MDS assessment, with the ARD of 5/15/24 which was completed on 6/10/24. The assessment was completed 11 days late. 3. Resident 60's clinical…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-02 · tag F0640 — isolated
    Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure timely submission of Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for assessment submission. (Resident 104) Findings include: Resident 104's closed clinical record was reviewed on 6/26/24 at 10:43 a.m. Clinical diagnosis included sepsis, congestive heart failure, and diabetes mellitus. The clinical record indicated the resident discharged from the facility on 4/4/24. The resident had a Discharge MDS assessment with the Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 4/4/24, which was completed on 4/18/24. This assessment was completed on time, but electronically transmitted for submission on 6/24/24. The assessment was transmitted 68 days late. During an interview, on 6/27/24 at 2:53 p.m., the MDS Coordinator indicated the assessment transmission task was split between herself and her offsite corporate consultant. This discharge assessment was missed in error during the transmission process. Once this error was discovered, the assessment was transmitted electronically immediately. She utilized the online…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-02 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to schedule, hold, and invite resident representatives to care plan meetings, held in conjunction with the assessment process for 3 of 4 residents reviewed for the provision of care plan meetings. (Residents E, F, & 92) Findings include: During a confidential interview with a resident representative, the representative indicated they were the party who was responsible for decision making and direction of the resident's care. The resident did not make independent decisions. The facility had not held a care plan meeting thus far in 2024. Their resident resided on one of the two secured dementia units. 1. Resident F's clinical record was reviewed on 6/26/24 at 9:34 a.m. Current diagnoses included dementia, anxiety, and psychotic mood disturbance. The resident resided on a secured dementia unit. The resident had an annual Minimum Date Set (MDS) assessment completed on 5/23/24. The resident also had a quarterly MDS assessment completed on 3/22/24. The resident additionally had a quarterly MDS assessment completed on 12/21/23. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-02 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the completion of physician ordered wound care treatments to promote healing of an abrasion for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for skin conditions. (Resident 83) Finding includes: Resident 83's clinical record was reviewed on 6/27/24 at 10:22 a.m. Diagnoses included an abrasion of the left foot, subsequent encounter, weakness, and unsteadiness on feet. A physician's order, dated 6/5/25, indicated to clean with Dakins (wound cleanser), apply collagen (wound treatment) to open area, and cover with foam and secure with elastic bandage to left outer foot topically every evening shift for wound healing. This order was discontinued on 6/12/24. A current physician order, dated 6/25/24, indicated to cleanse the left outer foot with Dakins (wound cleanser), apply collagen (wound treatment) to the open area and skin preparation to the tissue surrounding the wound, secure with bordered dressing every night shift on Tuesdays, Thursdays, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-02 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide wound care treatment and care as ordered to promote healing of a pressure injury for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for pressure injuries. (Resident 70) Finding includes: Resident 70's clinical record was reviewed on 6/26/24 at 4:20 p.m. Diagnoses included unspecified atrial fibrillation, weakness, chronic pain, and other abnormalities of gait and mobility. A physician order, dated 4/11/24, indicated to clean buttock with normal saline, apply Santyl (wound treatment for debridement) to open area, skin prep surrounding the wound area, and cover with a bordered dressing every evening shift for wound healing. This order was discontinued on 6/4/24. A current physician order, dated 6/4/24, indicated to clean buttock with normal saline apply santyl to the open area, skin prep the surrounding wound area and cover with bordered dressing every shift for wound healing. Review of the treatment administration record for May and June 2024 indicated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-02 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to follow physician orders related to oxygen administration for 2 of 4 residents reviewed for respiratory care. (Residents 60 and 73) Findings include: 1. During an observation on 6/24/24 at 11:23 a.m., Resident 60 was seated upright in bed with a nasal cannula in place. The oxygen concentrator was set to 4 liters per minute. On 6/24/24 at 2:17 p.m., Resident 60 was observed slumped down in her bed with her nasal cannula in place. The oxygen concentrator was set to 4 liters per minute. On 6/25/24 at 10:25 a.m., Resident 60 was observed lying in bed with her nasal cannula in place. The oxygen concentrator was set to 4 liters per minute. On 6/26/24 at 11: 11 a.m., Resident 60 was lying in bed, with her head elevated and her nasal cannula in place. The oxygen concentrator was set to 4 liters per minute. On 6/26/24 at 3:22 p.m., Resident 60 was slumped down in her bed with her nasal cannula in place. The oxygen concentrator was set to 3.5 liters per minute. Resident 60's clinical record was reviewed on 6/26/24 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-02 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure insulin (a medication to treat diabetes mellitus) vials were dated when opened and disposed of when expired for 2 of 6 carts reviewed for medication storage. (Rehab hall cart and 400 hall cart) Findings include: During a medication storage observation of the 400 hall cart, accompanied by LPN 33 on [DATE] at 9:23 a.m., the following was observed: One open vial of Lispro (rapid-acting) insulin, dated [DATE]; the vial was approximately half full. One open vial of Glargine (long-acting) insulin, dated [DATE]; the vial was approximately half full. One open vial of Lispro (rapid-acting) insulin, dated [DATE]; the vial was approximately half full. During an interview at the time of the observation, LPN 33 indicated she thought insulin was good for 30 days, but if a nurse was unsure how long medication was good for, she should ask the unit manager or another staff member. The insulins dated [DATE], [DATE], and [DATE] were expired and should no longer be…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-02 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow infection prevention and control procedures during wound care related to Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBPs) for 2 of 5 resident reviewed for skin impairments. (Residents 70 and 83) Findings include: During an observation on 6/24/24 at 11:02 a.m., Resident 70's door was closed with an Enhanced Barrier Precaution sign noted on the left side of the door. A personal protective equipment (PPE) canister was to the left of the door just outside the resident door. The sign was readily visible and indicated to use hand hygiene, a gown, and gloves for all high contact resident care to include wound care. During a wound observation and interview on 6/27/24 at 2:38 p.m., LPN 12 and CNA 13 entered Resident 70's Enhanced Barrier Precaution room with the sign visible to the left side of the door along with the personal protective equipment canister. They both performed hand washing, donned gloves, then LPN 12 set everything up for wound care. LPN 12 used gloved hands and removed the moderately soiled dressing from…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-05 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to report an allegation of misappropriation of property within required timeframe to the Indiana Department of Health for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for misappropriation. (Resident C) Finding includes: Resident C's clinical record was reviewed on 4/4/24 at 1:12 p.m. Diagnoses included displaced intertrochanteric fracture of the left femur, subsequent encounter for closed fracture with routine healing, alcohol abuse, difficulty in walking, and weakness. An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 2/11/24, indicated the resident was cognitively intact. A Nurse's Note, dated 3/4/24 at 6:55 p.m., indicated the resident was transferred to the hospital emergency room for lethargy. The clinical record lacked information on any personal items sent to the hospital with the resident. A Nurse's Note, dated 3/4/24 at 11:22 p.m., indicated the resident was admitted to the hospital. During an interview on 4/4/24 at 4:40 p.m., Resident C's representative…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-05 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to thoroughly investigate an allegation of misappropriation of resident property for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for misappropriation. (Resident C) Finding includes: During an interview on 4/4/24 at 10:42 a.m., the Administrator was requested to provide the complete investigation files for any abuse/misappropriation investigations held in the last 30 days. Resident C's clinical record was reviewed on 4/4/24 at 1:12 p.m. Diagnoses included displaced intertrochanteric fracture of the left femur, subsequent encounter for closed fracture with routine healing, alcohol abuse, difficulty in walking, and weakness. An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 2/11/24, indicated the resident was cognitively intact. He required moderate assistance for transfers, toileting, and dressing. A Nurse's Note, dated 3/4/24 at 6:55 p.m., indicated the resident was transferred to the hospital emergency room for lethargy. The clinical record lacked information on any…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-13 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — isolated
    Provide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to document and monitor behaviors and develop and implement a plan of care with targeted behavioral interventions for a cognitively impaired resident for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for behaviors. (Resident C) Findings include: The clinical record for Resident C was reviewed on 11/13/23 at 7:14 a.m. Diagnoses included Alzheimer's disease, anxiety disorder, depressive disorder, and Parkinson's disease. The resident was admitted on [DATE]. A 9/25/23, admission, Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment indicated he was severely cognitively impaired. Review of a facility self-reportable, dated 10/30/23, indicated during morning care, Resident C bit CNA 1 on the hand, breaking the skin and causing the hand to bleed. Review of the clinical record indicated lack of documentation and/or monitoring for known behaviors. During an interview on 11/13/23 at 8:08 a.m., LPN 2 indicated the resident reported to her that he was hit by a big black man. LPN 2 immediately reported…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-04-27 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — widespread
    Provide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure dietary staff were competent to perform kitchen essential duties. This deficient practice had the potential to impact 118 of 119 residents. Findings include: During an interview on 4/23/23 at 9:23 a.m., [NAME] 16 indicated the Dietary Manager quit a week prior. The Administrator managed the kitchen due to the vacancy. During an observation on 4/25/23 at 11:33 a.m., the Maintenance Director indicated he had filled in as the Dietary Supervisor for the last three days. The kitchen was not kept in a sanitary manner. Staff should have completed a cleaning log check-off each day to ensure the kitchen cleaning was done each day, but it had not been done. He was unable to provide the kitchen cleaning logs. A bottom shelf on the table to the left of the sink remained with significant various food debris, where clean food trays were stored up on their edge. The bottom panel off of the range remained in the floor with brown thick baked on debris. The steam table remained with dried food spatters on the sides of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-04-27 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure food was prepared, stored, and distributed in a safe and sanitary manner. This deficient practice had the potential to impact 118 of 119 residents who recieved meals from the facility kitchen. Findings include: During an interview on 4/23/23 at 9:23 a.m., [NAME] 16 indicated the Dietary Manager quit a week prior. The Administrator managed the kitchen due to the vacancy. During a kitchen observation on 4/23/23 at 9:23 a.m., the following was observed: a. Dried food was noted baked on the sides of the steam tables and around the temperature adjustment knobs on the side of the steam table with a brown appearance. b. Inside the free standing refrigerator, a package of unidentified lunch meat was opened and wrapped in plastic wrap on the second shelf. It lacked an opened date. c. Inside the microwave, dried food was splattered on the top, bottom, and sides. d. A shelf under the food preparation table, to the left of the sink, had moderate scattered food debris where clean food trays were stored on their…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-04-27 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide showers according to the resident's preferences for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for choices. (Resident 26) Finding includes: During an interview on 4/23/22 at 11:27 a.m., Resident 26 was resting in her bed with her eyes closed. Her hair was disheveled. She indicated she required staff assistance with her activities of daily living due to numbness in her bilateral hands and the need for a mechanical lift to get out of bed. Staff had provided bed baths, but she felt trapped in her bed and she wanted to get a shower rather than a bed bath. She was unaware of which days of the week she was scheduled to get a shower because she had not been offered a shower. She spoke with a CNA about getting a shower on the shower bed, about two to three weeks ago. When she asked other CNAs about using the shower bed, they were unaware of what she referred to. The resident's family had also contacted the facility about the condition of her hair. Resident 26's clinical record was reviewed on 4/25/23 at 4:17 p.m. Diagnoses…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-04-27 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure pressure relieving boots were in place as ordered for 1 or 1 residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. (Resident 85) Findings include: During an observation, on 4/24/23 at 9:10 a.m., Resident 85 was awake, lying in bed without socks or pressure relieving boots. His heels were not floated in the bed. On 4/25/23 at 10:22 a.m., the resident was lying on his back in bed, without pressure relieving boots applied or his heels floated. On 4/26/23 at 9:32 a.m., the resident was observed lying in bed on his right side, facing the window. He was without pressure relieving boots and his heels were not floated. Resident 85's clinical record was reviewed on 4/24/23 at 3:03 p.m. Diagnoses included, Alzheimer's disease, lumbar fracture, muscle wasting, and diabetes mellitus type 2. A significant change (MDS) minimum data set assessment, dated 2/25/23, indicated the resident was cognitively intact, required extensive assistance with bed mobility, dressing, eating, and toileting, and was at risk for impaired skin…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-04-27 · tag F0849 — isolated
    Arrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure there was timely communication maintained between the facility and the hospice provider for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for hospice services. (Resident 85) Findings include: Resident 85's clinical record was reviewed on 4/21/23 at 3:03 p.m. Diagnoses included Alzheimer's disease, muscle wasting, and chronic pain. The resident was admitted to hospice services on 2/23/23. A current care plan, initiated 2/23/23, indicated the resident received hospice services. Interventions included, hospice staff to collaborate with the facility to provide comfort care for the resident through the next review period. During a review of the hospice documentation on 4/26/23, the binder lacked any communication log notes from the nursing staff since 3/29/23. The last documentation of a nursing visit was dated 4/3/23. During an interview, on 4/26/23 at 11:00 a.m., LPN 3 indicated communication between facility staff and hospice staff occurred through the hospice binder. She indicated the binder was not up-to-date, and she was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-04-27 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure staff completed hand hygiene during medication administration for 1 of 3 staff observed during medication administration. (QMA 5) Findings include: During a medication administration observation on 4/26/23 at 8:53 a.m., QMA 5 was observed preparing medications for Resident 60. She failed to sanitize her hands prior to pulling the residents medications from the medication cart and while handling the medication cup. She placed her right index finger inside the cup when setting it on top of the medication cart. She did not sanitize her hands prior to, or after, administering the medications to the resident. At 9:07 a.m., QMA 5 began to prepare medications for Resident 83. She obtained a medication cup using her index finger and thumb to hold the cup, with her index finger inside the cup. Following preparation of the medication, she placed her right hand, with her palm resting on the top of the medication cup, to move them to the resident's room and administered the medication. QMA 5 went to the back up medication supply…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2023-04-27 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — widespread
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain floors in a clean, well-maintained condition, replace transition threshold strips, maintain paint integrity on door frames and handrails, and ensure wallpaper was affixed to the wall for 6 of 6 halls/units observed (100 Intermediate, 100 medicare, 200, 300, 400 and 500 halls). This deficient practice had the potential to impact 119 of 119 residents. Findings include: During an environmental tour, accompanied by the Environmental Services Director (ESD), on 4/27/23 from 10:57 a.m. to 11:20 a.m., environmental concerns regarding, floor cleanliness, missing transition threshold strips, paint chipped on door frames and handrails, and wallpaper not being affixed to the wall were identified as follows: a. The following locations were missing threshold transition strips were two different styles of flooring joined together. This resulted in gaps were dust and debris had collected: Resident rooms 314, 311, 314, 315, 307, 520, 521, 519,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$14,901 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

  • $14,901 — penalty dated 2025-08-01

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to CASTLE HEALTHCARE — 7 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 2 of 53.0-1.0 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 52.6-1.6 vs chain
Staffing 1 of 51.6-0.6 vs chain
Quality measures 5 of 54.7+0.3 vs chain
The other 6 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.0★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
DAVIESS COUNTY HOSPITALOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF100%since 02/01/2016
ANDERSON PROPCO LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2025
CONROY, TRACYIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 04/01/2017
RUSSELL, RANDALLIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 11/06/2017
SETTLES, APRILIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 01/01/2025
CLAYSHIRE LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2023
FORVIS MAZARS LLPOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2025
ANDRES, ANTHONYIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2025
BERDUGO, SHAIIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2023
PRUETT, DAVIDIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2025
BASCH, ZISSYIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 08/04/2025
DAVIS, NESANELIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 08/04/2025
NEUMAN, MENASHEIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 08/04/2025
STRIMBU, TINAIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 08/04/2025
SINGER, CHAYAIndividualTRUSTEE OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2025
CASTLE INDIANA MANAGEMENT LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2025
MRS HOOSIER TRUSTOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 08/04/2025
TSDAMA IN TRUSTOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 08/04/2025

CMS files one row per role, so the 27 rows in the source record cover these 18 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

7 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$18.9M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+11.1%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$3.9M
Related-party expense23% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 80%Medicare 8%Other / private 13%

About 80% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $3.9M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 23% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$382per resident / day
operating cost
$11,601per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$429per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IN

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Indiana Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Indiana
$8,943/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$10,326/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,639/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 155005. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-09-19, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next