Clinton House Rehabilitation And Healthcare Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.17 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 17% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 6% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 88 beds and averages 69.9 residents a day — about 79% occupied, or roughly 18 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.01 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.48 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.80 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.72 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.13 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.54 to 0.35 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 45% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

26 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 16 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · D2025-08-15 · tag F0636 — isolated
  Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment was completed within 14 days of admission for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for MDS assessments. (Resident 12)Finding includes:The clinical record for Resident 12 was reviewed on 8/11/25 at 2:42 p.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), dementia, and congestive heart failure.Resident 12 had an entry MDS assessment completed on 6/30/25.An admission MDS assessment, with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) date of 7/13/25, was still in progress and was not completed as of 8/12/25.During an interview, on 8/12/25 at 2:42 p.m., the MDS Coordinator indicated the admission comprehensive MDS assessment was overdue by 30 days. The assessment should have been completed by 7/13/25.During an interview, on 8/12/25 at 2:45 p.m., the MDS Coordinator indicated the facility followed the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) manual for their policy.An RAI manual, titled Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument 3.0 User's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-15 · tag F0638 — isolated
  Assure that each resident’s assessment is updated at least once every 3 months.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments were completed every 3 months for 3 of 4 residents reviewed for MDS assessments. (Resident 17, 30, and 59)Findings include:1. The clinical record for Resident 17 was reviewed on 8/11/25 at 3:15 p.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting the right dominant side, type 2 diabetes mellitus, moderate vascular dementia with psychotic and mood disturbance, and anxiety disorder.The first quarterly assessment after the annual comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident 17 was completed on 4/6/25. The next quarterly assessment was completed 4 months later (127 days), on 8/11/25.2. The clinical record for Resident 30 was reviewed on 8/11/25 at 3:20 p.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, hydrocephalus, paraplegia, and mild dementia with mood disturbance.The first quarterly assessment after the annual comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident 30 was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-15 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the physician was notified of high blood glucose levels within the physician's ordered call parameters for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for quality of care. (Resident 53)Findings include: The clinical record for Resident 53 was reviewed on 8/11/25 at 2:00 p.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, morbid obesity, type 2 diabetes, and hypertension.A physician's order, dated 7/22/25, indicated to give Admelog injection (insulin lispro) per sliding scale. If the blood glucose was 401 or more, give 9 units and call the Medical Doctor (MD).The following blood glucose readings were over 401 with no documentation the MD was called:a. On 7/23/25 at 11:29 a.m., the blood glucose reading was 496 with no documentation the MD was called.b. On 7/31/25 at 4:40 p.m., the blood glucose reading was 401 with no documentation the MD was called.c. On 8/6/25 at 9:18 p.m., the blood glucose reading was 417 with no documentation the MD was called.d. On 8/7/25 at 8:43 p.m., the blood glucose reading was 416 with no documentation the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-15 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — isolated
  Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a Registered Nurse (RN) was scheduled for at least 8 consecutive hours 7 days a week for 2 of 21 days reviewed for staffing. (7/20/25 and 8/3/25)Findings include:The as worked staffing schedules were reviewed on 8/11/25 at 1:35 p.m. A RN was not scheduled to work on Sunday, 7/20/25. A RN was not scheduled to work on Sunday, 8/3/25. The facility assessment, dated 3/17/25, indicated the facility had 2 residents who required IV (Intravenous) medications on average. Staff with specialized training such as RNs were to be assigned to areas with residents with higher acuity needs.During an interview, on 8/15/25 at 10:19 a.m., the Director of Nursing indicated there was no RN present in the facility on 7/20/25 and 8/3/25. The facility followed the CMS guidelines for staffing, and an RN should have been present on those dates for at least 8 consecutive hours.The facility did not provide a staffing policy prior to exit. 3.1-17(b)(3)

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-15 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure PPE (personal protective equipment) was worn correctly and to establish a clean field for wound care supplies for 1 of 6 residents reviewed for infection control. (Resident 21)Finding includes:During an observation, on 8/14/25 at 9:32 a.m., Unit Manager (UM) 2 gathered wound care supplies, which included, an antiseptic wound cleanser, gauze pads, calcium alginate with silver (an antimicrobial dressing), and a foam bordered dressing, in preparation to perform a wound care treatment for Resident 21. After gathering the wound care supplies, UM 2 then put on PPE (a gown and gloves). UM 2 did not tie the gown closed around her waist. UM 2 then placed the wound care supplies on Resident 21's bedside table and opened them. UM 2 was not observed to have cleaned the surface of the bedside table prior to placing the wound care supplies on the table and opening them. The wound care supplies were observed to have been placed on the bedside table next to a urinal with approximately 200 milliliters of urine in it.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-09-10 · tag F0655 — isolated
  Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure baseline care plans were completed within 48 hours after admission for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for baseline care plans. (Resident B and 34) Findings include: 1. During an observation, on 9/3/24 at 10:51 a.m., Resident B was wearing oxygen at 3 liters. The clinical record for Resident B was reviewed on 9/5/24 at 1:25 p.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, acute and chronic respiratory failure, type 2 diabetes, stage 3 chronic kidney disease, obstructive sleep apnea, and retention of urine. The resident was admitted on [DATE]. While reviewing the resident's care plan, the resident did not have a baseline care plan for the use of oxygen. During an interview, on 9/6/24 at 2:31 p.m., the Chief Nursing Officer (CNO) indicated there was not a respiratory baseline care plan for the resident. The policy was for the baseline care plan to be started within 48 hours of admission.2. The clinical record for Resident 34 was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-10 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to administer an as needed medication for weight gain, to notify the physician of a weight gain and to hold insulin doses per the physician's orders for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for quality of care. (Resident 34 and 68) Findings include: 1. The clinical record for Resident 34 was reviewed on 9/4/24 at 2:39 p.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, pneumonia, acute respiratory failure with hypoxia (absence of enough oxygen to sustain bodily functions), acute on chronic systolic congestive heart failure (heart is unable to pump blood as well as it should), and chronic kidney disease stage 3. A physician's order, dated 7/28/24, indicated to weigh the resident daily and to notify the physician if the resident had a weight gain of 3 pounds in a day or 5 pounds in a week for congestive heart failure. A physician's order, dated 7/28/24, indicated to give furosemide (a diuretic medication) 40 milligrams (mg) by mouth every 24 hours as needed (PRN) for a greater than 3-pound weight gain. The vitals record in the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-10 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 3. During an observation, on 9/3/24 at 10:51 a.m., Resident B was wearing oxygen at 3 liters. The clinical record for Resident B was reviewed on 9/3/24 at 1:25 p.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, acute and chronic respiratory failure, type 2 diabetes, stage 3 chronic kidney disease, obstructive sleep apnea, and retention of urine. The resident was admitted on [DATE]. While reviewing the resident's physician's orders, the resident did not have an order for the use of oxygen. During an interview, on 9/3/24 at 3:01 p.m., the DON indicated she was not aware the resident did not have an order for oxygen. During an interview, on 9/10/24 at 12:00 p.m., the DON indicated they did not have a policy for physician's orders. A current facility policy, titled CPAP/BiPap CLEANING POLICY, dated as last revised and received from the Director of Nursing on 9/10/24 at 11:58 a.m., indicated, .Nebulizer/BiPap/CPAP mask and oxygen tubing is to be stored in plastic bag when not in use 3.1-47(a)(6) Based on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-09-10 · tag F0700 — isolated
  Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure assessments were completed and a consent was obtained prior to the use of side rails for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for accident hazards. (Resident O and 63) Findings include: 1. During an observation, on 9/3/24 at 9:34 a.m., 9/3/24 at 10:49 a.m., 9/4/24 at 9:19 a.m., 9/5/24 at 2:42 p.m., 9/6/24 at 1:40 p.m., 9/9/24 at 2:54 p.m., and 9/10/24 at 10:47 a.m., a side rail was in the raised position and in use on Resident O's bed. The clinical record for Resident O was reviewed on 9/4/24 at 2:02 p.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, type 2 diabetes mellitus with diabetic neuropathy and hyperglycemia, unsteadiness on feet, weakness, lack of coordination, difficulty in walking, peripheral vascular disease, anxiety disorder, chronic pain syndrome, hypertension, and major depressive disorder. A side rail assessment, completed on 7/24/23, indicated Resident O did not need a side rail to assist in bed mobility. The electronic record did not have documentation…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-09-10 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
  Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a PRN (as needed) psychotropic medication was not ordered beyond 14 days or the attending physician documented their rationale in the resident's medical record to indicate the duration for the PRN order for 2 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. (Resident K and 183) Findings include: 1. The clinical record for Resident K was reviewed on 9/5/24 at 10:54 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting left non-dominant side, fibromyalgia, type 2 diabetes mellitus with hyperglycemia, recurrent major depressive disorder with psychotic symptoms, insomnia, unspecified affective mood disorder, anxiety disorder, post-traumatic stress disorder, and unspecified psychosis not due to a substance or known physiological condition. A physician's order, dated 2/9/24, indicated to give 1 tablet of alprazolam (an anti-anxiety medication) 0.25 mg (milligrams) by mouth every 12 hours as needed for anxiety with a 90 day stop date of 5/9/24. A…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to CASTLE HEALTHCARE — 7 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 29 rows in the source record cover these 17 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

6 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 75% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.7M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 19% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IN