Oak Grove Christian Retirement Village
221 W Division St, Demotte, IN 46310 · Non profit - Corporation · 73 certified beds · (219) 987-7005 Medicare & Medicaid certified
The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has 1 actual-harm citation
- a high number of inspection citations overall (55) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 3 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 4 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 4 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 23.1% | 11.0% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 2.4% | 5.5% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 1.1% | 0.4% | 0.9% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 2.1% | 1.1% | 2.0% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 0.0% | 25.2% | 6.5% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 3.7% | 3.9% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 32.2% | 11.9% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 20.5% | 23.5% | 18.9% | typical |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 39.1% | 95.4% | 95.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 5.6% | 3.6% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 30.8% | 23.3% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 8.8% | 13.6% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.8% | 1.2% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 7.1% | 79.0% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 31.0% | 22.2% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 6.5% | 10.8% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.03 | 1.61 | 1.67 | better |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 0.41 | 1.44 | 1.80 | better |
* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
39.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 139 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 79.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 68 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.37 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 63% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 13% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 39.6%CMS range 34.1–46.9 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | worse than U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.3%CMS range 6.7–14.4 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 79.4% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 79.4% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 82.3% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 95.3% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 100.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 6.0%CMS range 3.2–11.7 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.94 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 73 beds and averages 60.7 residents a day — about 83% occupied, or roughly 12 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.34 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.49 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.52 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.99 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.48 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.58 to 0.26 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 49% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are unchanged from the previous inspection. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
55 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 44 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-05-07 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident received proper assistance to prevent accidents, related to a CNA (Agency CNA 1) transferring a dependent resident (Resident B) from the bed to a chair without following the plan of care, causing pain and fractures to the resident's right leg and left ribs. The facility also failed to ensure Resident D, who was a high risk for falls and had a history of falls, was adequately supervised to prevent a fall which resulted in a head laceration requiring staples for healing for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for accidents/supervision. Findings include: 1. During an observation on 5/6/25 at 9:25 a.m., Resident B was sitting in a high back reclining chair. A mechanical lift pad was underneath the resident. She indicated the staff used a mechanical lift to transfer her. There was an immobilizer on her right lower leg. Resident B's record was reviewed on 5/6/25 at 10:26 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, a spiral fracture of the right tibia, peripheral vascular disease, history of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-14 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a care planned intervention for bed mobility was followed related to lack of adequate staff supervision during care which resulted in a fall from the bed, for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for accidents. (Resident C)The deficient practice was corrected on 4/3/26, prior to the start of the survey, and was therefore past noncompliance. The facility identified the concern on 3/23/26, completed a house wide education to the nursing department and agency staff who provided care to utilize and follow the Care Plan/Kardex (information for caring for the resident) for all residents. Audits were completed to ensure the Care Plans/Kardexs were all correct and updated for resident care. Eight facility staff and agency staff were interviewed and indicated the Kardex was used as a reference for completion of resident care.Finding includes:Resident C's record was reviewed on 4/13/26 at 10:27 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, dementia and osteoporosisThe resident's Kardexes, dated 7/7/25 and 3/22/26, indicated the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-14 · tag F0745 — failed to provide medically-related social services — isolatedProvide medically-related social services to help each resident achieve the highest possible quality of life.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident was provided with medically-related social services related to follow up care for an allegation of abuse for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for abuse. (Resident D)Finding includes:Resident D's record was reviewed on 4/14/26 at 11:02 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, dementia and Alzheimer's disease.A Significant Change Minimum Data Set assessment, dated 12/5/25, indicated a moderately impaired cognitive status, had other behaviors for one to three days and the behavior symptoms were worse.A Care Plan, dated 8/29/25, indicated anxiety was present and the resident would fixate on different things in regards to staff. The interventions included the staff would assist the resident to develop more appropriate methods of coping and interacting.An Indiana Department of Health reported incident, dated 2/3/26 at 10:30 a.m., indicated Resident D reported a CNA had shoved her in the chair and threw her walker. There were no injuries observed.A Care Plan, dated 2/4/26, indicated a history of making…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-14 · tag F0773 — isolatedProvide or obtain laboratory tests/services when ordered and promptly tell the ordering practitioner of the results.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure laboratory (lab) services were only completed when ordered by a Physician/Nurse Practitioner (NP), related to a urinalysis (UA) completed on a resident without a Physician's Order, for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for lab tests. (Resident B)Finding includes:Resident B's record was reviewed on 4/14/26 at 8:21 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, stroke and vascular dementia.A Progress Note, dated 3/23/26 at 11:35 a.m. and written by RN 1, indicated a urine specimen had been collected and the lab company was notified.There was no Physician/NP order for the urine specimen.During an interview on 4/14/26 at 10:06 a.m., RN 1 indicated the Director of Nursing (DON) requested the UA and she notified the NP. The resident had been catheterized for the urine collection.During an interview on 4/14/26 at 10:16 a.m., the DON indicated she had verbalized, we may want to get a UA, she had not directed RN 1 to get one and had assumed she would notify the NP for an order.410 IAC (Indiana Administrative Code)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-14 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident's record was complete and accurate related to documentation of an allegation of abuse for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for abuse. (Resident D)Finding includes:Finding includes:Resident D's record was reviewed on 4/14/26 at 11:02 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, dementia and Alzheimer's disease.An Indiana Department of Health reported incident, dated 2/3/26 at 10:30 a.m., indicated Resident D reported a CNA had shoved her in the chair and threw her walker. There were no injuries observed.There was no documentation of the allegation of abuse in the resident's record. During an interview on 4/14/26 at 11:58 a.m., the Executive Director indicated at the time of the allegation they had a staff member filling in for the Social Service Director. The facility abuse policy, dated 7/15/25, and received per email from the Director of Nursing as current, indicated actions taken would be documented.This citation relates to Intake 2961414.410 IAC (Indiana Administrative Code) 16.2-3.1-50(a)(1)410 IAC…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-05 · tag F0552 — isolatedEnsure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident's representative was informed when a resident had a change in condition and required an order for breathing treatment medication for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for change in condition. (Resident B) Finding includes: Closed record review for Resident B was completed on 2/5/26 at 10:24 a.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), heart failure, hypertension, dementia, atrial fibrillation, and depression.The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 10/31/25, indicated the resident was cognitively impaired. The resident received oxygen therapy.A Progress Note, dated 12/21/25 at 6:22 a.m., indicated the resident appeared to sleep well overnight. The staff indicated they had noticed a cough. The resident's lungs were clear.A Progress Note, dated 12/21/25 at 10:07 p.m., indicated a physician's order to administer albuterol sulfate inhalation nebulization solution (medication for breathing problems) via nebulizer two times a day for cough until…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-05 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident received the necessary care and treatment related to completing a respiratory assessment when a resident had a change of condition and completing pre-and-post assessments with breathing treatment medication for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for change of condition. (Resident B) Finding includes: Closed record review for Resident B was completed on 2/5/26 at 10:24 a.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), heart failure, hypertension, dementia, atrial fibrillation, and depression.The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 10/31/25, indicated the resident was cognitively impaired. The resident received oxygen therapy.A Progress Note, dated 12/21/25 at 6:22 a.m., indicated the resident appeared to sleep well overnight. The staff indicated they had noticed a cough. The resident's lungs were clear.A Progress Note, dated 12/21/25 at 10:07 p.m., indicated a physician's order to administer albuterol sulfate inhalation nebulization solution (medication…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-09-22 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to serve food under sanitary conditions related to dishes stored upright above and below the steam table, on a cart across from the 3-compartment sink and transporting uncovered food on room trays down the hallway. This had the potential to affect all 62 residents who received food from the Kitchen and 6 residents who received room trays on Oak Branch 2 unit. (Kitchen, Oak Branch 2) Findings include:1. The initial Kitchen tour was completed on 9/15/25 at 9:12 a.m., with the Dietary Manager (DM). The following was observed.a. Plates and bowls were stored upright above the steam table.b. Pans were stored upright on a shelf below the steam table.c. Plates and bowls were stored upright on a cart at the end of the steam table across from the 3-compartment sink.During an interview at the time of the tour, the DM indicated the dishes and pans should have been stored inverted and not upright.2. On 9/16/25 at 12:24 p.m., the staff were observed serving residents lunch on the Oak Branch 2 Unit. CNA 1 was observed placing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-22 · tag F0554 — isolatedAllow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were assessed for self-administration of medications and had a physician's order to self-administer medications, for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for self-administration of medication. (Residents 14 and 65)Findings include: 1. On 9/16/25 at 9:16 a.m., Resident 14 was observed seated in her wheelchair in her room. The nebulizer machine was on, and she had the mouthpiece in place to her mouth. There were no staff present in the room or near the room. LPN 2 was observed at the Nurse's Station, down the hall. The resident's record was reviewed on 9/17/25 at 9:34 a.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, dementia, hypertension, and osteoarthritis. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 6/6/25, indicated the resident was cognitively intact. A Physician's Order, dated 4/1/25, indicated ipratropium-albuterol solution 0.5 mg (milligrams)-3 mg/3 ml (milliliters) two times a day. There was a lack of any physician's order for self-administration of the medication or any…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-09-22 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set (MDS) comprehensive assessments were accurately completed related to antiplatelet and antianxiety medications for 1 of 16 MDS assessments reviewed. (Resident 6) Finding includes:Resident 6's record was reviewed on 9/18/25 at 2:42 p.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, history of traumatic brain injury, anemia, anxiety disorder, and cognitive communication deficit. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 6/12/25, indicated the resident was severely cognitively impaired. In the 7-day look-back period, the resident received antianxiety, antidepressant, anticoagulant, antibiotic, diuretic, and opioid medications. A Physician's Order, dated 5/31/25, indicated clopidogrel (antiplatelet medication) 75 milligrams 1 tablet once daily. There was no order for an antianxiety or anticoagulant medication in the June 2025 Physician's Order Summary. During an interview on 9/19/25 at 10:36 a.m., the Director of Nursing indicated the MDS assessment needed to be modified. The resident had…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-22 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a comprehensive care plan was developed and in place for residents with significant weight loss, diuretics, and opioid medications for 2 of 16 care plans reviewed. (Resident 6 and 44) Findings include: 1. Resident 6's record was reviewed on 9/18/25 at 2:42 p.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, history of traumatic brain injury, anemia, anxiety disorder, and cognitive communication deficit. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 6/12/25, indicated the resident was severely cognitively impaired. The resident had weight loss of 5% or more in the last month or loss of 10% or more in last 6 months and was not a prescribed weight-loss regimen. In the 7-day look-back period, the resident received antianxiety, antidepressant, anticoagulant, antibiotic, diuretic, and opioid medications. The resident's weight on 6/6/25 was 120.2 pounds and on 12/2/24 was 134.0 pounds. The September 2025 Physician's Order Summary indicated the resident was receiving Lasix (diuretic medication) 20 milligram (mg), 1…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 44 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-22 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide twice weekly showers/bathing for a resident who was dependent on staff for activities of daily living (ADLs) for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for ADLs. (Resident 3)During an interview on 9/15/25 at 10:53 a.m., Resident 3 indicated he was not receiving showers as he should. Resident 3's record was reviewed on 9/18/25 at 11:52 a.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, hemiplegia and hemiparesis (paralysis and weakness) following a stroke affecting the left non-dominant side. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 6/30/25, indicated the resident was cognitively intact. The resident required maximal assistance for showering/bathing. The Resident Preferences document, dated 5/13/25, indicated the resident preferred a shower on Monday and Thursday evenings. The previous 60 days of shower sheets were requested. There were documented showers or bed baths on 6/21, 7/3, 7/7, 7/10, 7/17, 7/21, 7/24, 7/28, 8/4, 8/18, 8/21, 8/25, and 9/4/25. There were no documented showers received after 9/4/25. During an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-22 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure signs and symptoms of constipation were addressed for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for constipation, skin treatments were completed as ordered and compression stockings were applied as ordered for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for non-pressure related skin conditions. (Residents 10, 16, and 13) Findings include:1. On 9/16/25 at 9:08 a.m., Resident 10 was observed lying in bed. The resident indicated she would sometimes go for 4-5 days without having a bowel movement. Sometimes the nurses would give her a laxative, and she still would not always have a bowel movement for days. Record review for Resident 10 was completed on 9/18/25 at 10:38 a.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, multiple sclerosis, anemia, hypertension, neurogenic bladder, anxiety, and depression. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 6/30/25, indicated the resident was cognitively intact. The resident had an impairment on both sides of her upper and lower extremities for a functional limitation in range of motion.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-22 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents with pressure ulcers received the necessary treatment and services to promote healing related to a physician's order for wound care not followed during a wound care observation for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. (Resident 44) Finding includes: Resident 44's record was reviewed on 9/17/25 at 11:03 a.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, type 2 diabetes mellitus, heart failure, and chronic kidney disease. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 7/24/25, indicated the resident was cognitively intact. The resident had an unstageable wound. A Physician's Order, dated 7/19/25, indicated cleanse the right heel with wound cleanser, pat dry, apply betadine, cover with ABD (abdominal) pad, and wrap with Kerlix (bandage wrap) every evening shift. During an observation of wound care on 9/19/25 at 1:39 p.m., Agency LPN 3 was observed performing wound care to Resident 44's right heel. Agency LPN 3 performed hand hygiene and donned a gown and gloves. She removed the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-22 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident who required nebulizer breathing treatments was assessed prior to, during, and/or after the treatment for effectiveness of the treatment for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for respiratory care. (Resident 14)Finding includes:On 9/16/25 at 9:16 a.m., Resident 14 was observed seated in her wheelchair in her room. The nebulizer machine was on, and she had the mouthpiece in place to her mouth. There were no staff present in the room or near the room. LPN 2 was observed at the Nurse's Station, down the hall.The resident's record was reviewed on 9/17/25 at 9:34 a.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, dementia, hypertension, and osteoarthritis.The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 6/6/25, indicated the resident was cognitively intact.A Physician's Order, dated 4/1/25, indicated ipratropium-albuterol solution 0.5 mg (milligrams)-3 mg/3 ml (milliliters) two times a day. There were no orders for a pre or post nebulizer treatment assessment.There was lack of documentation any…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-09-22 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — isolatedProvide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents with dementia received appropriate treatment and services related to lack of care planning with individualized interventions and activity assessments not completed for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for dementia care. (Residents 7 and 16) Findings include:1. On 9/18/25 at 11:41 a.m., Resident 7 was observed up ambulating in the hallway near the Nurse's Station. She stopped to ask LPN 2 what was for lunch. LPN 2 invited the resident to participate in the current activity that was going on, the resident agreed and went to the activity area.Resident 7's record was reviewed on 9/18/25 at 11:23 a.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, dementia with behavioral disturbance, general anxiety disorder, and multiple sclerosis.The Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 8/30/25, indicated the resident was cognitively impaired. She had received antipsychotic and antidepressant medications.A Care Plan, updated 5/28/25, indicated the resident had impaired cognitive function or impaired thought…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-22 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure infection control guidelines were in place and implemented related to lack of hand hygiene with glove changes during wound care and improper personal protective equipment (PPE) worn in an Enhanced Barrier Precaution (EBP) room while accessing a peripheral intravenous central catheter (PICC) line. (Residents 44 and 1) Findings include: 1. During an observation of wound care on 9/19/25 at 1:39 p.m., Agency LPN 3 was observed performing wound care to Resident 44's right heel. Agency LPN 3 performed hand hygiene and donned a gown and gloves. She removed the old dressing, performed hand hygiene, and donned clean gloves. She cleansed the area with wound cleanser and gauze, removed her gloves, and then donned new gloves without performing hand hygiene. She continued to pat the area dry with clean gauze and then applied the ABD pad and wrapped with Kerlix. During an interview on 9/19/25 at 1:48 p.m., Agency LPN 3 indicated she should have performed hand hygiene with every glove change. During an interview on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-09-22 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — isolatedImplement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to promote antibiotic stewardship by ensuring the appropriate use of antibiotic therapy to reduce antibiotic resistance related to antibiotics started without indication for use for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for urinary tract infections. (Resident 44 and 3) Findings include: 1. Resident 44's record was reviewed on 9/17/25 at 11:03 a.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, type 2 diabetes mellitus, heart failure, and chronic kidney disease. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 7/24/25, indicated the resident was cognitively intact. A Progress Note, dated 9/4/25 at 1:33 p.m., indicated the nurse practitioner was notified of the resident's high blood sugar and new orders were received for a urinalysis (urine test) with culture and sensitivity. A urinalysis result, dated 9/5/25 at 4:05 p.m. and reported on 9/8/25 at 7:01 a.m., indicated the resident's urine was positive for enterococcus faecium (bacteria) vancomycin-resistant strain (VRE) 50-100,000 colonies per milliliter. The bacteria had resistance to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-13 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure medications were administered as ordered for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for medication administration. (Resident C) Finding includes: Resident C's record was reviewed on 8/13/25 at 9:04 a.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, Alzheimer's disease, heart failure, and hypertensive chronic kidney disease. The Annual Minimum Data Set assessment, dated 7/18/25, indicated the resident was moderately impaired for daily decision making. A Care Plan, dated 3/31/25, indicated the resident had an altered cardiovascular status related to congestive heart failure, hypertension (high blood pressure), and hyperlipidemia (high levels of fat/lipids in the blood). Interventions included, but were not limited to, administer medications as ordered. A Physician's Order, dated 4/1/25, indicated metoprolol tartrate (blood pressure medication) 25 milligrams, 1 tablet by mouth twice a day. Check blood pressure (bp) prior to administering the medication. Hold the medication if bp is less than 100/50 or heart rate is less than 60. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-13 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents received the necessary care and treatment related to oxygen administration, lack of respiratory assessments, and oxygen saturation monitoring for 2 of 4 residents reviewed for respiratory care. (Residents B and D)Findings include:1. Record review for Resident B was completed on 8/12/25 at 1:39 p.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, heart failure, chronic pulmonary edema (excess fluid in the lungs), and hypertension. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 7/9/25, indicated the resident was moderately cognitively impaired. The resident required partial moderate assistance with bed mobility and dressing. The resident received oxygen therapy. A Care Plan, dated 7/3/25, indicated the resident required oxygen therapy related to ineffective gas exchange. An intervention included to check the oxygen tank every 4 hours to make sure the resident had sufficient supply. The August 2025 Physician’s Order Summary (POS) indicated an order for oxygen at 4 liters per nasal cannula…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-13 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to maintain clinical records that were complete and accurately documented related to documentation of medications and oxygen administered for 2 of 4 residents reviewed for medications and oxygen. (Residents B and C) Findings include:1. Record review for Resident B was completed on 8/12/25 at 1:39 p.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, heart failure, chronic pulmonary edema (excess fluid in the lungs), and hypertension. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 7/9/25, indicated the resident was moderately cognitively impaired. The resident required partial moderate assistance with bed mobility and dressing. The resident received oxygen therapy. A Care Plan, dated 7/3/25, indicated the resident required oxygen therapy related to ineffective gas exchange. An intervention included the resident required the oxygen continuous at all times. A Care Plan, dated 7/25/25, indicated the resident had an order for BiPAP (bilevel positive airway pressure machine to assist with breathing) therapy to be worn at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-07 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident who received new diagnoses of a fractured right tibia and multiple fractured ribs from a facility incident was assessed thoroughly and frequently upon returning from the emergency room for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for quality of care. (Resident B) Finding includes: Resident B's record was reviewed on 5/6/25 at 10:26 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, a spiral fracture of the right tibia, peripheral vascular disease, history of traumatic brain injury, and cognitive deficit. Cross reference F689. A Nurse's Progress Note, dated 3/10/25 at 10:29 p.m., indicated the resident returned to the facility per ambulance. She was assisted to bed by two staff. There was an immobilizer on the right lower leg. She complained of pain to the area. A Nurse's Progress Note, dated 3/11/25 at 1:37 a.m., indicated the immobilizer on the right leg was in place. There was no assessment of the right leg or the status of the resident. There were no assessments completed by the nurses on 3/12/25. A Nurse…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-10-22 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a sanitary kitchen related to dishwasher temperatures not reaching the required temperature and lack of temperature monitoring for a high temperature dish machine. This had the potential to affect all 52 residents who received meals from the Main Kitchen. Finding includes: The initial kitchen tour was completed on 10/15/24 at 9:00 a.m. with the Dietary Manager (DM). The DM indicated the dishwasher was a high temperature dish machine. A wash cycle was observed and the wash temperature was 105 degrees (Fahrenheit) and the rinse was 191 degrees. The DM indicated the wash cycle should be 180 degrees and he was unsure about the rinse cycle. The Dish Machine Temperature Log for October 2024 was reviewed. The log indicated, High Temperature Machine Wash 160 degrees, Rinse 180 degrees. Report any variations to the Food Service Supervisor or Administrator. Breakfast wash/rinse temperatures were recorded as follows: 10/2- 128/185 10/4- 130/187 10/9- 127/187 10/10-129/134 10/11- 138/187 10/14- 156/176 Lunch…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-10-22 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to establish and/or maintain a system that accounted for, periodically reconciled, and ensured the disposition of all controlled drugs, related to inaccurate documentation of narcotic medications for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for narcotics. (Resident 211) This had the potential to affect all residents who received narcotic medications. The deficient practice was corrected by 9/26/24, prior to the start of the survey, and was therefore past noncompliance. The facility thoroughly investigated the narcotic documentation irregularities and possible staff involvement, notified the appropriate entities, re-educated current staff on misappropriation and narcotic documentation, and implemented audits for narcotic documentation accuracy. Finding includes: The record for Resident 211 was reviewed on 10/18/24 at 9:16 a.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, heart failure, Alzheimer's disease, and absence of right leg above knee. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment indicated the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-22 · tag F0623 — isolatedProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident and/or their Responsible Party were notified in writing related to a transfer to the hospital for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for hospitalization. (Resident 15) Finding includes: Resident 15's record was reviewed on 10/17/24 at 9:50 a.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, heart failure, diabetes mellitus and fluid overload. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment, dated 7/27/24, indicated the resident was significantly impaired for daily decision making. Progress Notes indicated the resident was sent to the hospital on 8/24/24 and returned to the facility on 8/29/24. There was no documentation to indicate the State approved transfer form was completed and sent with the resident. There was no documentation to indicate the resident's Responsible Party had received written notification of the resident's transfer to the hospital. During an interview on 10/17/24 at 9:20 a.m., RN 4 indicated when residents were sent out to the hospital they were sent with a face sheet, a copy of the DNR, bed hold…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-22 · tag F0625 — isolatedNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident and/or their Responsible Party were sent the facility's bed hold and reserve bed payment policy before and upon transfer to the hospital for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for hospitalization. (Resident 15) Finding includes: Resident 15's record was reviewed on 10/17/24 at 9:50 a.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, heart failure, diabetes mellitus and fluid overload. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment, dated 7/27/24, indicated the resident was significantly impaired for daily decision making. Progress Notes indicated the resident was sent to the hospital on 8/24/24 and returned to the facility on 8/29/24. There was no documentation to indicate the facility's bed hold policy was completed and sent with the resident. There was no documentation to indicate the resident's Responsible Party had received written notification of the facility's bed hold policy. During an interview on 10/17/24 at 9:20 a.m., RN 4 indicated when residents were sent out to the hospital they were sent with a face sheet,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-22 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure care plans were reviewed and revised to include changes related to IV (intravenous) fluids for 1 of 22 resident care plans reviewed. (Resident D) Finding includes: Resident D was observed in bed on 10/15/24 at 9:44 a.m. There were no IV supplies or equipment in her room. The resident indicated she had not had an IV since returning to the facility from the hospital on 9/14/24. Resident D's record was reviewed on 10/17/24 at 1:44 p.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, malignant neoplasm of kidney, urinary tract infection, pathological fracture, bone cancer, paraplegia, and neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 8/27/24, indicated the resident was cognitively intact. A Care Plan, dated 9/14/24, indicated the resident needed IV fluids for dehydration. Interventions included, but were not limited to, administer IV fluids, monitor IV site and arm every shift, and complete flushes per orders. There were no Physician's Orders for IV fluids.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-22 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure parameters were in place for Physician notification related to weight monitoring for a resident with three times a week weights for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for edema. (Resident 15) Finding includes: Resident 15's record was reviewed on 10/17/24 at 9:50 a.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, heart failure, diabetes mellitus and fluid overload. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment, dated 7/27/24, indicated the resident was significantly impaired for daily decision making. A Physician's Order, dated 4/22/24, indicated to weigh the resident every Monday, Wednesday and Friday related to congestive heart failure. There were no parameters in place for when to notify the Physician of a change in weight. The current Fluid Maintenance Care Plan indicated the resident was at risk for fluid volume overload due to congestive heart failure. Interventions included, but were not limited to, monitor electrolytes, assess for presence of edema, follow fluid volume restriction orders and monitor input and output.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-22 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident with pressure ulcers received the treatment and services necessary to promote healing related to updating and following Physician's Orders for wound care for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for pressure ulcers (Resident 20). Finding includes: During an observation of Resident 20's wound care on 10/21/24 at 10:54 a.m., the Wound Care Nurse was observed changing the dressings on the right heel, right ankle, and right lower leg. She entered the room, washed her hands with soap and water, and donned a gown and gloves. She removed the old dressings from the right lower leg, right ankle, and right heel, each dated 10/19/24. She removed her gloves and donned new gloves, without performing hand hygiene between glove use. She sprayed wound cleanser to gauze and cleaned the right lower leg and then threw away the gauze. She removed more gauze, sprayed it with wound cleanser and cleaned the right ankle. She removed more gauze, sprayed it with wound cleanser and cleaned the right heel. She opened a foam…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-22 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure an indwelling Foley (urinary) catheter collection bag for a resident with a history of infection was covered and not hanging off the top of a garbage can for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for urinary catheters. (Resident C) Finding includes: On 10/16/24 at 10:37 a.m., Resident C was observed sitting in a recliner in her room. The resident's urinary catheter bag was uncovered and hanging off the top of a garbage can sitting next to her. The uncovered bag was touching the top and the side of the garbage can. The garbage can was observed with trash in the can. On 10/16/24 at 3:15 p.m., the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) was asked to observe the resident's catheter bag. Resident C was observed sitting in a recliner in her room. The resident's urinary catheter bag was uncovered and hanging off the top of a garbage can sitting next to her. The uncovered bag was touching the top and the side of the garbage can. The garbage can was observed with trash in the can. Record review for Resident C was completed on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-22 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents received the necessary care and treatment related to respiratory equipment not changed as ordered and incorrect flow rate of oxygen (O2) administered for 3 of 4 residents reviewed for respiratory care. (Residents B, C, and D) Findings include: 1. On 10/15/24 at 10:16 a.m., Resident B was observed sitting in a wheelchair in her room. An oxygen concentrator was next to the resident. The water humidification bottle on the concentrator was dated, 10/6/24. The resident's night stand drawer was open and a nebulizer treatment mask was observed, dated 10/6/24. Record review for Resident B was completed on 10/16/24 at 3:02 p.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, heart failure, respiratory failure, and COPD (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease). The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 8/19/24, indicated the resident was moderately cognitively impaired. The resident required oxygen therapy. A Care Plan, dated 11/19/23, indicated the resident had a diagnosis of COPD and was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-22 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure each resident's medication regimen was managed and monitored to promote or maintain the resident's highest practicable mental, physical, and psychosocial well-being related to lack of non-pharmacological interventions used prior to giving anti-anxiety medication and lack of monitoring for side effects of an antidepressant for 2 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. (Residents 37 and 48) Findings include: 1. Resident 37's record was reviewed on 10/18/24 at 9:00 a.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, Alzheimer's dementia, depression and asthma. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 7/19/24, indicated the resident had significant cognitive impairment and received anti-anxiety medications. A Physician's Order, dated 6/24/24, indicated to give alprazolam (anti-anxiety medication), 0.25 milligrams (mg) every six hours as needed for as needed for anxiety. A Physician's Order, dated 6/21/24, was for an anxiety…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-22 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure clinical records were complete and accurately documented related to the lack of a resident's name on a self-medication administration assessment for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. (Resident 23) Finding includes: The record for Resident 23 was reviewed on 10/16/24 at 2:46 p.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, repeated falls, hemiplegia (paralysis on one side of the body) due to a stroke, aphasia (loss of language use), hypertension, and right foot drop. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 8/6/24, indicated the resident had moderate cognitive impairment, and required set up assistance for most activities of daily living. A Physician's Order, dated 8/2/24, indicated the resident could self-administer Econazole nitrate powder (an antifungal medication) topically, twice daily to the groin and scrotum. A Self-Administration of Medication Evaluation, dated 8/2/24 and received from the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON), failed to document a resident's name. During an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-22 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure infection control guidelines were in place and implemented related to hand hygiene and glove use during a wound treatment for 1 of 1 treatments observed. (Wound Care Nurse and Resident 20) Finding includes: During an observation of Resident 20's wound care on 10/21/24 at 10:54 a.m., the Wound Care Nurse was observed changing the dressings on the right heel, right ankle, and right lower leg. She entered the room, washed her hands with soap and water, and donned a gown and gloves. She removed the old dressings from the right lower leg, right ankle, and right heel, each dated 10/19/24. She removed her gloves and donned new gloves, without performing hand hygiene between glove use. She sprayed wound cleanser to gauze and cleaned the right lower leg and then threw away the gauze. She removed more gauze, sprayed it with wound cleanser and cleaned the right ankle. She removed more gauze, sprayed it with wound cleanser and cleaned the right heel. She did not perform hand hygiene or change gloves between caring for each wound.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-24 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure medical records were complete and accurately documented, related to oxygen administration and saturation levels, for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for oxygen. (Residents B and C). Findings include: 1. A record review for Resident B was completed on 7/24/24 at 10:41 a.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), hypertension, and dementia. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 4/22/24, indicated the resident was cognitively impaired. The resident received oxygen therapy. A Care Plan, dated 5/4/24, indicated the resident had chronic respiratory failure, COPD, and used oxygen. An intervention included to check oxygen saturation every shift. A Resident Experience Form, dated 7/15/24, indicated the resident's daughter had a concern with the resident's portable oxygen tank not being turned on. The summary of the investigation indicated the portable oxygen tank was full but not turned on. The facility spoke with the Nurse Practitioner who then gave an order to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-14 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to report an allegation of abuse/neglect to the Administrator of the facility, for 1 of 1 resident with an allegation of abuse/neglect voiced by a family member. (Resident B) Finding includes: Resident C's record was reviewed on 5/13/24 at 8:09 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, Alzheimer's disease, dementia, and diabetes mellitus. A Quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment, dated 2/17/24, indicated the resident had a moderately impaired cognitive status, had no behaviors, and was dependent for eating. A Care Plan, dated 7/21/23, indicated a risk for falls. An intervention, dated 7/21/23, indicated no hot drinks were to be served in the room or with meals. A Nurse's Progress Note, dated 5/8/24 at 4:29 a.m., indicated Agency LPN 1 was summoned to the resident's room by a CNA and observed the resident in bed with reddened skin to the upper abdomen and underneath the left breast. The areas were tender to touch and the resident grimaced and winced when the area was touched. Resident B had indicated she had spilled…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-14 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure adequate supervision was provided and care plan interventions were followed to prevent a fall (Resident D) and spillage of hot coffee on the skin (Resident C), for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for accidents and supervision. Findings include: 1. Resident D's record was reviewed on 5/14/24 at 8:58 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, dementia. A Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 4/22/24, indicated the resident had a severely impaired cognitive status, no behaviors, no impairments of the upper and lower extremities, was dependent for toileting, and required maximum assistance for bed mobility and transfers. She was independent with wheelchair mobility and had no falls since the last review. During an interview on 5/14/24 at 10:04 a.m., The RN MDS Nurse indicated the MDS assessment was incorrect and the resident had a fall on 2/29/24 and the MDS would be modified. A revised Care Plan, dated 5/4/24, indicated a risk for injuries related to falls and falls had occurred on 12/15/23, 1/29/24,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-17 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident received the necessary treatment and services related to the lack of a thorough and timely assessment completed after a resident had fallen for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for falls. (Resident B) Finding includes: Resident B's record was reviewed on 4/16/24 at 10:50 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, Alzheimer's disease, fracture around the internal prostheses of the left knee, and pathological fracture of the right ankle. A Nurse's Progress Note, dated 3/29/24 at 7:44 p.m., indicated the resident was being assisted with transferring by Agency CNA 1 and was lowered to floor in the bathroom. There were no injuries observed. The family, Nurse Practitioner, and the Director of Nursing (DON) were notified. The vital signs were within normal limits. The after-fall assessment on 3/29/24 at 7:44 p.m., was not thorough and had not included the presence or absence of significant findings, nor the actual vital signs. There were no other assessments completed after the fall on 3/29/24 at 7:44 p.m.,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-11-20 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure a sanitary kitchen related to built up burnt food debris and grease in 2 ovens for 1 of 1 kitchens observed (Main Kitchen). This had the potential to affect 54 residents who received food from the kitchen. Finding includes: The initial kitchen tour was completed on 11/13/23 at 9:07 a.m. The inside of 2 ovens had an accumulation of built up burnt food debris and grease. Interview with [NAME] 1 on 11/13/23 at 9:18 a.m., indicated the ovens were supposed to be cleaned weekly and dig not appear to be cleaned for awhile. Interview with the Dietary Manager on 11/17/23 at 11:09 a.m., indicated the ovens should be cleaned at least weekly. 3.1-21(i)(3)
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-20 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident's dignity was maintained related to an uncovered urinary catheter bag for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for dignity. (Resident 21) Finding includes: On 11/13/23 at 10:24 a.m. and again on 11/14/23 at 11:42 a.m., Resident 21 was observed lying in bed. A urinary catheter bag was hanging on the side of the bed with visible urine in the bag. There was not a covering over the bag. The bag was visible from the doorway. Record review for Resident 21 was completed on 11/14/23 at 11:45 a.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, stroke, neurogenic bladder, anxiety, and depression. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 9/18/23, indicated the resident was cognitively moderately impaired. The resident had an indwelling urinary catheter. Interview with RN 1 on 11/14/23 at 11:47 a.m., indicated the resident's catheter bag should have been covered with a dignity bag. 3.1-3(a)
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-20 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolatedHonor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident's preference was honored related to not receiving a beverage of choice per her request for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for choices. (Resident 1) Finding includes: On 11/15/23 at 9:23 a.m., Resident 1 was sitting at a table by the nurse's station. The resident asked LPN 1 if she could have some hot chocolate. LPN 1 indicated she would have to ask the resident's nurse. LPN 1 was observed asking RN 1 if the resident could have some hot chocolate. RN 1 indicated the resident would have to wait until the resident's daughter arrived to the facility to assist her with the hot chocolate. The resident would spill it on herself without assistance. LPN 1 then went back and told the resident she would have to wait until her daughter got there to assist her with the hot chocolate. Record review for Resident 1 was completed on 11/15/23 at 9:21 a.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to tardive dyskinesia (movement disorder that causes involuntary facial tics), heart failure, hypertension, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-20 · tag F0623 — isolatedProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident and/or their Responsible Party were notified in writing related to a transfer to the hospital for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for hospitalization. (Residents 48 and 55) Findings include: 1. Resident 48's record was reviewed on 11/14/23 at 11:56 a.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, dementia, anxiety and depression. The resident resided on the memory care unit. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment, dated 9/5/23, indicated the resident required limited staff assistance for bed mobility, transfers and eating, and extensive staff assist for toileting. Progress Notes dated 8/5/23, indicated the resident was sent to the hospital for evaluation following a fall. The resident returned later that day. On 8/6/23, the resident was sent back to the hospital for additional evaluation after complaining of pain to her hip from the fall. There was a lack of documentation any hospital transfer form had been completed or the State transfer form had been provided in writing to the resident or his responsible…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-20 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a baseline care plan was developed and implemented within 48 hours of admission for 1 of 18 residents reviewed for care plans. (Resident 48) Finding includes: Resident 48's record was reviewed on 11/14/23 at 11:56 a.m. The resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, dementia, anxiety and depression. The resident resided on the memory care unit. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment, dated 9/5/23, indicated the resident required limited staff assistance for bed mobility, transfers, and eating, and extensive staff assist for toileting. The admission Care Plan was initiated on 7/15/23. There were no care plans prior to that date, including a baseline care plan within 48 hours of admission. Interview with the Medical Records Coordinator, on 11/15/23 at 11:15 a.m., indicated there was no baseline care plan completed for the resident.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-20 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to develop and implement a care plan for a resident with denture problems for 1 of 20 resident care plans reviewed. (Resident 1) Finding includes: On 11/13/23 at 10:21 a.m., and 11/15/23 at 9:17 a.m., Resident 1 was observed not wearing her dentures. Record review for Resident 1 was completed on 11/15/23 at 9:21 a.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to tardive dyskinesia (movement disorder that causes involuntary facial tics), heart failure, hypertension, and depression. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 8/28/23, indicated the resident was cognitively moderately impaired. The resident required supervision of 1 person for eating. The assessment did not have the section checked for broken or loosely fitting dentures. The record lacked any documentation of a dental care plan. Interview with RN 1 on 11/15/23 at 9:55 a.m., indicated the resident's dentures did not fit and that was why she was not wearing them. The resident had tardive dyskinesia (movement disorder that causes involuntary…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-20 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure the necessary care and services were provided to a dependent resident related to assistance with dentures daily for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for activities of daily living. (Resident 1) Finding includes: On 11/13/23 at 10:21 a.m., Resident 1 was observed sitting in a wheelchair in her room. The resident did not have any teeth. A sign was taped on the front of her dresser that indicated to put the resident's dentures in her mouth every morning. The sign also indicated the dentures were in a yellow cup in the bathroom. The dentures were then observed to be inside a yellow cup on the bathroom sink. On 11/15/23 at 9:17 a.m., Resident 1 was observed sitting in a wheelchair by the nurses's station. The resident did not have her dentures in. At 9:19 a.m., the resident's dentures were observed in the yellow cup on top of her bathroom sink. On 11/15/23 at 10:59 a.m., Resident 1 was observed sitting in a wheelchair in her room. The resident had her dentures in her mouth. The resident was talking with her…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-20 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident received the necessary treatment and services related to the lack of a thorough assessment completed after a fall for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for falls. (Resident 32) Finding includes: Record review for Resident 32 was completed on 11/14/23 at 2:00 p.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, hemiplegia following cerebral infarct affecting left nondominant side, epilepsy, type 2 diabetes mellitus without complications, constipation, hypertension, and vitamin D deficiency. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 8/25/23, indicated bed mobility, dressing, transfers, and toileting required extensive assistance. Eating required supervision, and hygiene required limited assistance. The resident also required a wheelchair, cane, and crutches. Progress Notes, dated 10/16/23, indicated the CNA report sheet listed 1 assist, left side weakness, wheelchair bound, and bed pan at night for the resident. Interview with the DON on 11/15/23 at 2:32 p.m. indicated she was unaware of any recent fall.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-20 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident received the proper care and treatment for respiratory services related to an empty oxygen humidifier bottle and oxygen tubing not changed as ordered for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for respiratory care. (Resident 20) Finding includes: On 11/15/23 at 2:19 p.m. and 11/16/23 at 2:40 p.m., Resident 20 was observed in her bed. Her oxygen concentrator was on, the nasal cannula in place and flowing at 2 liters per minute. The nasal cannula tubing was connected to the humidifier bottle on the concentrator. The humidifier bottle was empty and the date on the tubing was 11/8. The resident's record was reviewed on 11/16/23 at 2:20 p.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, dementia, heart failure and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. She resided on the memory care unit. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment, dated 10/11/23, indicated the resident was severely cognitively impaired and required extensive staff assistance for bed mobility, transfers and toileting. She used oxygen while in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-20 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure each resident's medication regimen was managed and monitored to promote or maintain the resident's highest practicable mental, physical, and psychosocial well-being related not following up on pharmacy recommendations in a timely manner for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. (Resident 48) Finding includes: Resident 48's record was reviewed on 11/14/23 at 11:56 a.m. The resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, dementia, anxiety and depression. The resident resided on the memory care unit. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment, dated 9/5/23, indicated the resident required limited staff assistance for bed mobility, transfers and eating, and extensive staff assist for toileting. Current Physician's Orders included Pantoprazole (a proton pump inhibitor used to treat acid reflux) 40 milligrams (mg) daily for gastric problem and Sertraline (an antidepressant) 50 mg daily for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-20 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure each resident's medication regimen was managed and monitored to promote or maintain the resident's highest practicable mental, physical, and psychosocial well-being related to not monitoring the pulse prior to medication administration with ordered parameters for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. (Resident 24) Finding includes: The record for Resident 24 was reviewed on 11/14/23 at 2:00 p.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, hypertension, dementia, and hyperlipidemia. The admission Minimum Data Set assessment, dated 10/31/23, indicated the resident was cognitively impaired. The Physician's Order Summary, dated 11/2023, indicated an order for metoprolol succinate ER (extended release) (an antihypertensive medication) 50 mg (milligrams) daily. Hold if heart rate less than 60 or blood pressure less than 100/50. The Medication Administration Record (MAR), dated 11/2023, indicated the resident's blood pressure was documented prior to the administration of the metoprolol medication. There…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-20 · tag F0839 — isolatedEmploy staff that are licensed, certified, or registered in accordance with state laws.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a staff member who worked in the facility as a Registered Nurse had an active license. This had the potential to affect all 54 residents who resided in the facility. Finding includes: The employee files were reviewed on [DATE] at 9:22 a.m. RN 2 was hired into the facility as a Registered Nurse on [DATE]. The nurse's license expired on [DATE]. Interview with the HR Director on [DATE] at 10:24 a.m., indicated the last time RN 2 worked in the facility as a Registered Nurse was [DATE]. The nurse would be taken off the schedule until her license was renewed. 3.1-14(s)
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-20 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure infection control guidelines were in place and implemented related to a lancet disposed of improperly for a random observation during a blood sugar check. (Resident 107) Finding includes: On 11/16/23 at 11:21 a.m., RN 3 assessed Resident 107's blood sugar levels. RN 3 sterilized her hands and took the glucometer out of the bag. RN 3 applied gloves, cleaned the residents finger, and pricked the finger to obtain the blood sample. The resident's blood sugar was 190. The RN took off her gloves and threw them, including the lancet, into the garbage can in the resident's room. The RN proceeded to walk out of the resident's room into the hallway. Interview with the RN on 11/16/23 at 11:28 a.m., indicated she thought she put the lancet in the sharps container. The surveyor informed the RN that she put the lancet in her gloves and threw it in the trash can in the resident's room. The RN indicated she believed she did put the lancet in the garbage can inside her glove on accident, but she knew the lancet…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-26 · tag F0554 — isolatedAllow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to determine self-administration of medications was appropriate for residents, related to medications left with the residents for self administration and no assessment to indicate the residents were appropriate for self administration of medications, for 3 of 3 residents observed with medications left on the table and in the room for administration. (Residents F, C, and E) Findings include: 1) During an observation on 9/25/23 at 8:57 a.m., Resident F was sitting in the Dining Room at a table with three other residents. She had a medication cup sitting in front of her, which contained multiple pills. The resident then began taking the medications orally until all medications were gone. The Nurse was at the Medication Cart, located at the Nurses' Station, outside of the Dining Room. The Nurse's back was to the resident. During an interview on 9/25/23 at 9 a.m., Nurse 3 indicated she was going to come back to the Dining Room and she does not normally leave the medications with the resident. Resident F's record was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-26 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolatedEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure dietary preferences were followed, related to not providing items listed on the individual meal card for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for food preferences. (Resident B) Finding includes: During a supper meal observation on 9/25/23 at 5:16 p.m., Resident B was served a [NAME] sandwich, green beans, mixed melon fruit, coffee, and cranberry juice. The individual dietary menu card indicated the resident preferred hot tea and whole milk. During an breakfast meal observation on 9/26/23 at 8:31 a.m., Resident B was served an egg and sausage biscuit sandwich, a piece of wheat toast with butter, coffee, and apple juice. The individual dietary card indicated the resident preferred cranberry juice. During an interview on 9/26/23 at 8:37 a.m., Nurse 1 indicated the resident's son filled out the menu preferences at the beginning of each month. During an interview on 9/26/23 at 8:43 a.m., CNA 1 indicated the residents were to be served what was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-26 · tag F0808 — failed to follow doctor-ordered diets — isolatedEnsure therapeutic diets are prescribed by the attending physician and may be delegated to a registered or licensed dietitian, to the extent allowed by State law.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were served therapeutic diets as ordered by the Physician, related to dietary and extra protein supplements, for 2 of 3 residents observed for therapeutic diets. (Residents C and D) Findings include: 1. During an observation of the dinner meal on 9/25/23 at 5:33 p.m., Resident C received her meal, which consisted of chicken corn bread bake, vegetable soup, melon mix, and cranberry juice. She had not received a health shake with her meal. After she consumed her dinner, she left the dining room at 5:58 p.m. and had not received a health shake with her dinner meal. During an observation on 9/26/23 at 8:38 a.m., Resident C received her breakfast meal, which consisted of one hard cooked egg, a piece of toast, cold cereal, and cranberry juice. The Dietary Card indicated she was to receive double protein for breakfast. During an interview with Dietary Aide 1 on 9/26/23 at 8:40 a.m., he indicated double protein would be two servings of eggs. The special instructions were on the Dietary Card and he…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2025-09-22 · tag F0732 — widespreadPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to post in a timely manner the daily staffing sheet which indicated how many staff were working in the facility and the facility census. This had the potential to affect the 62 residents who resided in the facility. Finding includes: On 9/16/25 at 9:32 a.m., the daily staffing sheet located at the Oak Branch Nurses' station was dated 9/14/25. On 9/16/25 at 12:30 p.m., the daily staffing sheet was at the Oak Branch Nurses' station was dated 9/15/25. During an interview on 9/16/25 at 3:50 p.m., the Director of Nursing indicated the Staff Coordinator thought the previous day's staffing levels were supposed to be posted daily.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2025-05-30 for 11 days
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to GREENCROFT COMMUNITIES — 5 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1 of 5 | 2.6 | -1.6 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 1 of 5 | 2.0 | -1.0 vs chain |
| Staffing | 3 of 5 | 3.6 | -0.6 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 4 of 5 | 4.6 | -0.6 vs chain |
The other 4 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.6★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| WOODLAWN HOSPITAL | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | 100% | since 01/01/2016 |
| BODE, GLEN | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; TRUSTEE OF THE SNF | — | since 12/09/2022 |
| CHUDZYNSKI, KENDRA | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; TRUSTEE OF THE SNF | — | since 10/15/2024 |
| FISHER, ALAN | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 06/13/2022 |
| HEYDE, ALISON | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; TRUSTEE OF THE SNF | — | since 09/01/2019 |
| JOHNSON, TERRI | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; TRUSTEE OF THE SNF | — | since 06/13/2022 |
| MELLINGER, GREGORY | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; TRUSTEE OF THE SNF | — | since 06/13/2022 |
| MILLER, BRANDON | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; TRUSTEE OF THE SNF | — | since 04/07/2025 |
| WEBB, HARRY | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; TRUSTEE OF THE SNF | — | since 10/15/2023 |
| OAKGROVE CHRISTIAN RETIREMENT VILLAGE | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2016 |
| BIERMA, SHARON | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2023 |
| DAVIS, HUGH | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 02/05/2024 |
| DEVRIES, GERRIT | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2021 |
| HAMSTRA, DONNA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2019 |
| HOEKSTRA, DON | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2018 |
| INGRAM, BETH | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 05/13/2024 |
| KOOY, RANDY | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2024 |
| MCKIM, DARLA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2023 |
| OLINSKI, LYNDA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/08/2020 |
| OUWENGA, LARRY | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2021 |
| PATEL, CHIRAG | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2020 |
| VANKEPEL, KARL | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2019 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 45 rows in the source record cover these 22 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $1.4M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 15% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in IN
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Indiana Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 155667. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-09-22, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.