Golden Years Homestead

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

48.3% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 87 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 53.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 43 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.26 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 36% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 21% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 111 beds and averages 91.4 residents a day — about 82% occupied, or roughly 20 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.09 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.31 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.02 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.68 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.26 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.37 to 0.16 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 13% is below the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

21 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 10 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-01-30 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident was effectively secured in the wheelchair following manufacturer recommendations during a van transport. This deficient practice resulted in the resident falling out of the wheelchair when a van driver applied the brakes and incurring a spinal injury. (Resident Z) The Immediate Jeopardy began on 1/3/24 when Resident Z slid out of his wheelchair during transport when the facility van made a sudden stop. The Administrator and Director of Nursing (DON) were notified of the Immediate Jeopardy on January 29, 2024 at 4:06 P.M. The immediate jeopardy was removed on 1/30/2024 Findings include: On 1/29/24 at 10:25 A.M., Resident Z's record was reviewed. Diagnoses included lumbar stenosis (narrowing of open spaces in lower spine which puts pressure on spinal cord and nerves traveling through the spine). The resident admitted to the facility 12/19/23 for short-term rehabilitation following reconstructive surgery to his spine. On 1/3/24, the resident was seen at the emergency room and diagnosed with a new acute…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-07 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
  Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to monitor for adverse side effects of opioid medications with and increased dose for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for pain management. Findings include:A list of recent deaths was provided by the Director of Nursing on [DATE] at 10 AM. The list indicated Resident B passed away on [DATE] at 5:08 AM at the facility.Resident B's record was reviewed on [DATE] at 10:29 AM. Diagnoses included post right hip fracture, Parkinson's, diabetes mellitus, depression and stage 3 chronic kidney disease.Resident B was admitted to the facility on [DATE] for rehab due to a right hip fracture.Active orders included the following for pain:admission order, [DATE] included Hydrocodone- Acetaminophen (Norco) Oral Tablet 5-325 MG - give 1 tablet by mouth every 4 hours as needed for pain.admission order, dated [DATE], indicated give Naproxen Oral Tablet 500 mg - 1 tablet every 12 hours as needed for pain.An order, dated [DATE], indicated to give Oxycodone - Acetaminophen Oral…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-05 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to assess mobility for 1 of 4 residents reviewed. (Resident 35) Findings include:During an observation, on 07/30/2025 at 9:59 AM, Resident 35 was in a wheelchair. [NAME] her feet were not resting on foot rest and her chin was tucked with her head tucked sharply to the right and her fists were clenched. During an observation, on 07/31/2025 at 9:50 AM, Resident 35 was sitting in a specialized chair in front of a fireplace with her chin tucked and feet on a footrest. Resident 35's head was all the way to her right and out of the head rest. Resident 35's record was reviewed on 7/31/25 at 11:52am. Her diagnoses included Parkinson's, type 2 diabetes, and unspecified dementia. The record indicated a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (section GG) was completed on 7/11/25 with no impairment to upper extremities.The care plan, dated 7/11/25, was without a specific plan for contractions of upper or lower body. In an interview, on 08/01/2025 at12:56 PM, the MDS coordinator indicated she should have coded hands and shoulder…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-17 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure allegations of verbal abuse and mistreatment were reported to the Administrator and state agency within required timeframes for 3 of 5 residents reviewed (Resident B, Resident D, and Resident H).Findings include:A report, dated 6/29/25, alleged Resident B and Resident H were involved when Certified Nurse Aid (CNA) 5 had yelled at the residents and not provided care according to their individual care plans. The report alleged the incidents had been reported to management, but nothing had been done. The report indicated Resident D had alleged physical abuse, reported to Human Resource staff instead of the Administrator or Director of Nursing (DON) per facility policy, and no investigation had allegedly been done.1.The report, dated 6/29/25, alleged on 5/26/25, Resident B had wanted to have his brief changed and had been trying to get staff's attention. He had been seated in his wheelchair next to his bed. His call light was on the other side of the bed and out of his reach. Employee 2 indicated they had observed the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-07 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident was administered medication as ordered by the physician for 1 of 3 residents reviewed (Resident Q). Findings include: On 5/7/25 at 10:45 A.M., Resident Q's record was reviewed. Diagnoses included epilepsy with partial seizures and dementia. A physician order, dated 11/14/25, indicated to give Levetiracetam (anti-seizure medication) 750 milligrams (mg); take 1 tablet by mouth every 12 hours for seizures. A physician order, dated 4/30/25, was to discontinue Levetiracetam 750 mg; take 1 tablet by mouth every 12 hours and start Lacosamide 100 mg tablets; take 1 tablet by mouth 2 times per day for seizures. An Interdisciplinary (ID) note, dated 4/30/25 at 2:05 p.m., indicated Resident Q had gone out for an appointment with the Neurologist. She returned to the facility with new orders to discontinue Levetiracetam and begin Lacosamide 100 mg tablets; take 1 tablet by mouth 2 times per day for seizures. The pharmacy was notified of the change in orders. A Medication Administration Record (MAR), dated May 2025,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-05-07 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolated
  Ensure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's inappropriate touching behavior was identified, prevention interventions implemented and the behavior trended for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for behaviors (Resident D and Resident E). Findings include: Reports, dated 4/12/25 and 4/13/25, alleged Resident D had inappropriately touched a female resident (Resident E) on her legs and chest. Both reports indicated there had been no documented interventions put in place to protect the residents and ensure no further inappropriate touching occurred. The reports alleged there was no documentation in either resident's record regarding the behaviors on 4/7/25. 1. On 5/5/25 at 1:44 P.M., Resident D's record was reviewed. Diagnoses included, Parkinson's, dementia, anxiety, and depression. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 2/6/25, indicated a Brief Interview Mental Status (BIMS) assessment indicated Resident D had no cognitive impairment. He had several mood indicators as follows: little interest or pleasure in doing things, feeling down,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-05-07 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain complete and accurate medical records for 2 of 3 residents reviewed (Resident D and Resident E). Findings include: Reports, dated 4/12/25 and 4/13/25, alleged Resident D had inappropriately touched a female resident (Resident E) on her legs and chest. Both reports indicated there had been no documented interventions put in place, following the alleged incident, to protect the residents and ensure no further inappropriate touching occurred. The reports alleged there was no documentation in either resident's record regarding the incidents on 4/7/25. 1. On 5/5/25 at 1:44 P.M., Resident D's record was reviewed. Diagnoses included, Parkinson's, dementia, anxiety, and depression. An Interdisciplinary (ID) note, dated 4/7/25 at 11:47 p.m., indicated the nurse had been notified by staff, Resident D had engaged in inappropriate behavior throughout the day. The nurse notified the Director of Nursing (DON) and Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON). An ID note, dated 4/8/25 at 3:26 p.m., indicated the hospice case manager had…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-09-23 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications were dated when opened, and destroyed when expired in 2 of 4 medication carts. Findings include: During an observation, on [DATE] at 1:36 PM, with License Practical Nurse (LPN) 4 on the D hall medication cart, Trelegy 100/ 62.5, inhaler was without a box and no open date for Resident 47. LPN 4 indicated medication should not be in the cart without the date. During an observation on [DATE] at 1:50 PM, with Qualified Medication Aide (QMA) 5 on C hall medication cart, there was an open bottle of Nystatin [NAME] 100 mg with no open date for Resident 27. On the second medication Cart on C hall with QMA 5, was a bottle of Lidoncaine Sol 2% oral with no open date for Resident 25. In the same medication cart, was the medication Insulin Lispro INJ 100 U with an open date of [DATE] and an expiration date of [DATE] for Resident 37. In the same drawer there was a medication of Lantus INJ 100 U with an open date of [DATE] and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-09-23 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure 1 of 5 residents reviewed were free of abuse. (Resident 26). Findings include. Resident 26's record was reviewed 9/17/24 at 2:18PM. Resident 26's diagnoses included dementia, depression, and muscle weakness. A Minimal Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 8/21/24, indicated Resident 26's Brief Interview for Mental Status score (BIMS ) was 3. A score of 3 indicated severe cognitive decline. Section E of MDS indicated Resident 26 had no behavioral symptoms of aggression. Resident 26 was continent of bowel and used a catheter due to urine retention. Resident 26's care plan, dated 9/17/24, indicated he had cognitive loss. Interventions were to allow plenty of time for care, do not rush or push, do not show impatience. Resident 26's care plan, dated 9/17/24, had a problem of argumentative behavior and becoming agitated easily by others. Interventions were to please intervene as needed to ensure safety and the safety of others, please talk with resident in calm manner; do not give directions, do not argue.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-23 · tag F0699 — isolated
  Provide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure interventions were implemented to prevent feelings of fear for 1 of 2 residents reviewed. (Resident 3) Findings include: In an interview, on 9/17/24 at 11:09AM, She indicated she had been overwhelmed since her husband's passing in May 2024. Resident 3 pointed to several boxes against the wall across from her bed of memorabilia she felt responsible to sort and disperse to family members. Resident 3 explained her diagnosis of PTSD realted to sexual, verbal, and physical abuse as a child. Resident 3 indicated the only times she was triggered in the facility was when a peer (Resident 85) was coming into her room uninvited especially at night. Resident 3 described a male peer coming into her room sometimes making it to the foot of her bed before she would see him or feel him looking at her. Resident 3 reported she would be the one to alert staff to his continued unwanted presence in her room, and he would be redirected back to his room.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-09-23 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure infection control measures were maintained for oxygen tank tubing for 2 of 3 residents reviewed. (Resident 16 and Resident 247) During an observation, on 9/17/24 at 12:20 PM, there were 2 oxygen tanks in the hallway on the floor. The tubing for both tanks were observed to be wrapped around the hand rail outside of the beauty shop. There were no covers, any bags, or dates observable for the tubing to be placed into. In an interview, on 9/17/24 at 12:25 PM, the Director of Nursing (DON), indicated the resident would wear their oxygen to the beauty shop and leave the tank outside. 1. A record review of Resident 16 was completed on 9/17/24 at 1:05 PM. Diagnosis included, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. A physician order for Oxygen 2 liter (L)/ min, indicated to give nasal oxygen every shift for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with (acute) exacerbation. 2. A record review of Resident 247 was completed on 9/17/24 at 1:05 PM . Diagnosis included, dependence on supplemental oxygen. A physician order…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$15,646 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $15,646 — penalty dated 2024-01-30

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to GREENCROFT COMMUNITIES — 5 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 58 rows in the source record cover these 25 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $2.8M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 19% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IN