Hamilton Grove

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

52.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 47 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.26 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 38% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 11% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 85 beds and averages 45.6 residents a day — about 54% occupied, or roughly 39 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.04 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.81 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.40 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.64 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.20 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.87 to 0.67 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 51% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

29 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 18 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2024-07-03 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to prevent unstageable pressure ulcers from developing and failed to provide necessary treatment and services to promote healing, prevent infection and prevent new ulcers from developing on the bilateral heels of a resident who was admitted without pressure ulcers, for 1 of 3 residents review for pressure ulcers. (Resident C) This deficient practice resulted in the development of a facility-acquired Deep Tissue Injury (DTI) on the left heel that deteriorated to an unstageable pressure injury and the development of a facility-acquired Deep Tissue Injury (DTI) and DTI on the right heel that deteriorated to a stage three pressure injury with signs and symptoms of infection and required debridement. Findings include: The record for Resident C was reviewed on 6/28/2024 at 12:05 P.M. Diagnoses include, but were not limited to, multiple sclerosis (MS), edema, neuropathy, and hypertension A Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment, dated 3/1/2024, indicated the resident was cognitively intact, had bilateral lower extremity…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-09 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure wound treatments were in place as ordered and neurological checks were completed following a fall for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for non-pressure skin conditions and 1 of 3 residents reviewed for falls. (Resident B)Finding includes: On 6/8/26 At 1:10 p.m., Resident B was observed in her room with CNA 1. CNA 1 lifted the resident's pant leg and removed her sock so the resident's wounds could be observed on the right lower leg and left heel. Neither wound had a dressing in place, both were open to air. During an interview at the time, CNA 1 indicated she was unaware if the resident required any dressings to the wounds.Resident B's record was reviewed on 6/8/26 at 11:00 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, dementia, heart failure, COPD, kidney disease stage 3, panic disorder, history of falling, anemia (low iron), depression, and macular degeneration (vision loss).The Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 3/26/26, indicated the resident was severely impaired for daily decision…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-03 · tag F0628 — isolated
  Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the responsible party for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for discharge from the facility, received in writing, a Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage including the date of discharge. (Resident B) Finding Includes:On 12/1/25 at 1:14 P.M., Resident B's clinical record was reviewed. Resident B was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged home with family on 11/8/25. The residents' diagnoses included but were not limited to a fractured sacrum, chronic bronchitis, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, repeated falls, altered mental status, depression, anxiety, and liver cancer.A facility admission Agreement form, dated 9/3/22 and signed by the facility Area Marketing Liaison and Resident B's family member on 10/3/25, indicated the family member was Resident B's Resident Representative. The admission Agreement indicated the Resident Representative was an individual the Resident had chosen to act on his or her behalf to support decision making; access…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-03 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure a discharge care plan was created for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for discharge planning. The facility also failed to ensure the Resident's Responsible Party was invited to participate in the care planning process for their family member for 1 of 3 resident reviewed for discharge planning. (Resident B).Finding Includes:On 12/1/25 at 1:14 P.M., Resident B's clinical record was reviewed. Resident B was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged home with family on 11/8/25. The residents' diagnoses included but were not limited to a fractured sacrum, chronic bronchitis, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, repeated falls, altered mental status, depression, anxiety, and liver cancer.A facility admission Agreement form, dated 9/3/22 and signed by the facility Area Marketing Liaison and Resident B's family member on 10/3/25, indicated the family member was Resident B's Resident Representative. The admission Agreement indicated the Resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-08 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to notify a Physician of a resident's change in condition related to blood pressures and missed doses of medication for 2 of 5 residents who were reviewed. (Resident 3 and 30 Findings include: 1. Resident 3's record review was completed on 5/6/2025 at 8:53 A.M. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to: dementia, major depressive disorder, generalized anxiety disorder, hypercholesterolemia, supravalvular aortic stenosis, peripheral vascular disease, atrial fibrillation, nonrheumatic mitral valve disease and hypertension. Current Physician's orders indicated Resident 3 was to receive 2.5 milligrams (mg) of olanzapine (treats symptoms of mental health disorders), 10 mg of melatonin (sleep aid) and 40 mg of pravastatin (treats high cholesterol) at bedtime. A review of the April 2025 Medication Administration Record (MAR) indicated Resident 3 had refused her bedtime medications of olanzapine, melatonin and pravastatin on 4/8/2025. In addition, Resident 3 had not received her bedtime doses of olanzapine, melatonin or pravastatin…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-08 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
  Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure adequate monitoring of antipsychotic medications occurred medications timely for 2 of 3 residents who were reviewed for antipsychotic medications . (Resident 3 and 18) Findings include: 1. Resident 3's record review was completed on 5/6/2025 at 8:53 A.M. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to: dementia, major depressive disorder, generalized anxiety disorder, hypercholesterolemia, supravalvular aortic stenosis, peripheral vascular disease, atrial fibrillation, nonrheumatic mitral valve disease and hypertension. A current Physician's order indicated Resident 3 received 2.5 mg of olanzapine (antipsychotic medication that treats symptoms of mental disorders) once a day at bedtime. Resident 3 had an AIMS (Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale) assessment on 12/2/2024. There was no documentation to indicate another AIMS assessment had been completed after 12/2/2024 and before 5/6/2025. During an interview on 5/5/2025 at 2:20 P.M., the Director of Nursing indicated the facility's policy was to perform an AIMS…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-08 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to store food in a sanitary manner related to labeling and dating opened food and disposing of expired food in 1 of 1 kitchen that was reviewed. This deficient practice had the potential to affect 49 of the 49 residents who received their meals from the kitchen. Finding includes: During an observation of the kitchen on 4/30/2025 at 8:15 A.M. with the Certified Dietary Manager (CDM), the following foods were in the walk-in cooler, but were expired or had no opened on or use by date: - 1 package of smoked turkey dated 4/14/2025 - 1 container with cut up purple onion dated 4/20/2025 - 1 container of premade chicken salad dated 4/22/2025 - 1 package of Virginia ham dated 4/21/2025 - A container with cut up white onion dated 4/21/2025 During an observation of the kitchen with the CDM on 4/30/2025 at 8:20 A.M., the following was observed: - Leaf tarragon was open but did not have an opened on or use by date. - Ranch powder was open but did not have an opened on or use by date. - Red food coloring was open but did not…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-05-08 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolated
  Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a sanitary environment related to disposing of expired food in a resident's personal refrigerator for 1 of 3 personal refrigerators observed. Finding includes: During an observation on 4/30/2024 at 9:51 A.M. of Resident 3's personal refrigerator, the following was observed: - A container of parmesan cheese with an expiration date of 11/2023 - A single serve cup of chocolate pudding with an expiration date of 7/3/2024. - A single serve cup of vanilla pudding with an expiration date of 11/24/2024. - Two cups of juice were covered with no date. The juice in both cups had separated and a large buildup of a thick white substance covered the top third of the juice glasses. - One bowel with a lid that contained no made on or use by date. The food in the bowel had mold and was unidentifiable. During an interview on 4/30/2024 at 9:55 A.M., RN 2 indicated she was not sure whose responsibility it was to clean out resident's personal refrigerators. She indicated expired food should not be in the resident's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-22 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure medication and supplement orders were accurately transcribed and medications were administered timely to 2 of 3 residents reviewed for medication orders. (Resident C and J) Findings include: 1. The record for Resident C was reviewed on 10/21/2024 at 11:00 A.M. Diagnoses included but were not limited to, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, diastolic congestive heart failure and left ventricular heart failure. A Physician's Order, dated 7/23/2024, indicated the resident's Lasix (a diuretic medication) was to be increased to 80 mg per day. The Medication Administration Records (MARs) for July 2024 and August 2024 indicated the order was documented on the administration record, but the resident only received the medication twice, on 7/27 and 8/3. On 8/13/2024 the Nurse Practitioner (NP) reordered 80 mg of Lasix medication per day. Another order, dated 9/18/2024, indicated to increase Occuvite (a vitamin supplement) to twice daily. The September…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-06 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to develop person-centered care plans for activities, behaviors, ADLs (activities of daily living), and dementia care for 4 of 15 residents whose care plans were reviewed. (Residents 25, 23, 36 and 53) Findings include: 1. During a random observation on 4/30/2024 at 11:21 A.M., Resident 25 was not seen in an activity. During an observation, on 4/30/2024 at 1:19 P.M., Resident 25 was in bed sleeping, there was a small clock radio sitting on a dresser across the room, there was no television in the room. A record review was completed on 5/1/2024 at 2:22 P.M. for Resident 25. Her diagnoses included, but were not limited to, dementia, anxiety, depression, psychotic disorder and bipolar. An Annual MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment, dated 5/31/2023, indicated it was not very important to her to have books, magazines, newspapers to read and it was somewhat important to listen to music she liked. A Quarterly MDS assessment, dated 2/18/2024,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-05-06 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews, the facility failed to provide activities of daily living (ADLs) for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for activities of daily living. (Resident 36) Finding includes: During an observation, on 4/29/2024 at 11:11 A.M., Resident 36 was noted to not have been shaved and his fingernails were long with brownish yellow matter under them. During an observation on 5/1/2024 at 9:10 A.M., Resident 36 was still not shaved and his fingernails were long. A record review for Resident 36 was conducted on 5/1/2024 2:18 P.M. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, Alzheimer's, dementia, major depressive disorder, general anxiety disorder, and psychotic disorder with delusions. An Annual Minimum Data (MDS) assessment, dated 2/1/2024, indicated no response to the question regarding cognition. No behavior concerns were noted. He was dependent for bathing, hygiene, and dressing. He needed set up help for bed mobility, transfers and walking A Care Plan indicated Resident 36 had an actual or potential problem with activities of daily living (ADLs)…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

• Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-08-02 for 7 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to GREENCROFT COMMUNITIES — 5 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 38 rows in the source record cover these 19 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $964K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IN