Advena Living Of Cherryvale

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.23 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 28% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 6% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 45 beds and averages 33.5 residents a day — about 74% occupied, or roughly 12 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.10 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.47 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.88 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.65 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.29 on weekdays — 19% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.49 to 0.41 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 35% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

28 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 18 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · F2025-09-04 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  The facility reported a census of 26 residents and one main kitchen. Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to store and prepare food under sanitary conditions for the residents of the facility. This deficient practice put the residents of the facility at risk for illnesses related to food borne bacteria. Findings included:- On 09/02/25 at 09:17 AM, observations during the initial kitchen tour with Dietary Staff BB revealed the following concerns: The handwashing sinks had brown stains and grime buildup around the sink's inner and outer edges, surrounding the sink's bowl.The foot-operated trash can had a broken lid lying on the floor behind the trash can, in a pile of used coffee grounds. The open trash can was adjacent to the food preparation area, beside the steam table and a rack of clean dishes. Dietary Staff BB agreed that the food preparation area should have the trash contained to ensure food sanitation and contamination from bacteria.On 09/03/25 at 11:20 AM, during a kitchen follow-up tour with Dietary Staff BB, observations revealed the uncovered trash can…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-09-04 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — widespread
  Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  The facility reported a census of 26 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide housekeeping and maintenance services to ensure a safe and sanitary environment in the facility outside kitchen access hallway and laundry area. This created the risk for impaired safety and cleanliness. Findings included:- On 09/02/25 at 09:17 AM, a tour of the facility's kitchen area with Dietary Staff BB revealed a hallway leading from the kitchen to outside with multiple broken tiles and standing water on the floor, which was being tracked through the kitchen. Dietary Staff BB reported that when it rains, the water comes in the entrance hallway to the kitchen and must be mopped up to keep the water out of the kitchen. She confirmed the hallway was used by kitchen staff to take the trash out, and the broken tile prevented sanitation of the area. On 09/04/25 at 07:58 AM, Maintenance Staff U confirmed multiple broken tiles in the hallway outside the kitchen, which led to the outside. He stated he did not realize the broken and missing tiles existed.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-09-04 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 26 residents; the sample included 14 residents. Based on interviews, record review and observation, the facility failed to ensure a safe, clean home-like environment in the resident's rooms and common areas. This deficient practice placed the residents at risk for tripping hazards, electrical accidents, respiratory hazards and decreased comfort. Findings included:- During an observation on 09/02/25 at 12:23 PM, there were multiple dark spots on the floor at the head of R15's bed, and molding was missing from the base of the wall next to the bathroom door, with exposed and broken drywall. There were damaged ceiling areas with exposed sheet rock, and the floor was dirty and stained.Observed on 09/02/25 at 11:22 AM, R30's had a large area of wall next to the resident's bed with exposed dry-wall, and paint was missing that was approximately a quarter of the wall; the floor was dirty and sticky.Observed on 09/02/25 at 11:25 AM, the north hallway floor and north hallway rooms had…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-09-04 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — pattern
  Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  The facility identified a census of 26 residents. Twenty-six medications were observed for medication administration accuracy. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate of less than five percent (%) when staff administered four medications in error resulting in a medication error rate of 17%. This placed the residents at risk of ineffective medication regimens. Findings included:- Resident (R) 12's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) included the following orders:Carafate oral tablet, 1.0-gram (gm) (Sucralfate- an anti-ulcer medication with potential to alter the absorption of some drugs), give 1.0 gm, by mouth before meals for GERD; dissolve tablet in liquid of choice, give 30 minutes before meals, ordered 0/15/25.Zofran oral tablet 4 MG/ (Ondansetron- medication to relieve nausea), give one tablet by mouth, before meals for nausea/vomiting (N/V) with meals, ordered 08/16/25.Lactulose (synthetic sugar used to treat constipation) oral solution, 20 grams/30 milliliters (ml). Give 30 ml by mouth every 24 hours as needed for…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-09-04 · tag F0924 — pattern
  Put firmly secured handrails on each side of hallways.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  The facility reported a census of 26 residents. Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide a safe and functional handrails in one of two hallways. This placed the residents at risk of impaired safety. Findings included:- Observed on 09/04/25 at 10:20 AM, during the facility tour with Maintenance Staff U, numerous handrails in the north resident hallway were loose and easily moved by hand.During an interview on 09/04/25 at 10:30 AM, Maintenance Staff U stated that he was unaware that there were loose handrails.During an interview on 09/04/25 at 10:38 AM, Administrative Staff A stated that she was unaware that there were loose handrails anywhere in the facility. She further stated that she expected staff to be vigilant and place a work order whenever they noticed any damaged equipment or when environmental repairs were needed.The facility policy Environment-General Cleanliness and Maintenance, dated 08/2024, documented that staff of the facility would provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, allowing each resident to use…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-09-04 · tag F0552 — isolated
  Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 26 residents; the sample included 14 residents. Based on interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed to inform Resident (R) 3, R4, R23 and/or their representative regarding the risks related to psychotropic (alters mood or thoughts) medications. These practices had the potential to lead to uninformed decisions regarding treatment. Findings included:- Review of the Electronic Health Record (EHR) for R3 included diagnoses of schizophrenia (a mental disorder characterized by gross distortion of reality, disturbances of language and communication, and fragmentation of thought), cerebral edema (abnormal buildup of fluid in the brain, causing it to swell and increasing pressure inside the skull), and adjustment disorder with anxiety (a mental health condition characterized by excessive worry, nervousness, and fear in response to a stressful life event). R3’s Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-09-04 · tag F0553 — failed to let residents help plan their care — isolated
  Allow resident to participate in the development and implementation of his or her person-centered plan of care.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 26 residents; the sample included 14 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to include Resident (R) 1 or her representative in the development and planning of the resident's care plan. This deficient practice placed R1 at risk of impaired care and decreased autonomy. Findings included:- R1's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) from the Diagnosis tab documented diagnoses of depression (a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest), psychotic disturbance (a mental health condition characterized by a loss of contact with reality, leading to distorted perceptions, thoughts, and behaviors), mood disturbance (psychiatric conditions characterized by persistent and intense changes in emotional state, such as prolonged sadness, irritability, or mania, leading to a decreased quality of life and potential functional impairment), and anxiety (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-09-04 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
  Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 26 residents; the sample included 14 residents, with five sampled for unnecessary medications. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a14-day stop date or justification for the continuation of an as needed (PRN) psychotropic medication (alters mood or thought) including a specified duration for Resident (R)3. This deficient practice placed R3 at risk of unnecessary psychotropic medication and related adverse effects. Findings included:- Review of the Electronic Health Record (EHR) for R3 included diagnoses of schizophrenia (a mental disorder characterized by gross distortion of reality, disturbances of language and communication, and fragmentation of thought), cerebral edema (abnormal buildup of fluid in the brain, causing it to swell and increasing pressure inside the skull), and adjustment disorder with anxiety (a mental health condition characterized by excessive worry, nervousness, and fear in response to a stressful life…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-09-04 · tag F0628 — isolated
  Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 26 residents. The sample included 14 residents with one resident reviewed for hospitalization. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify the Ombudsman of Resident (R)23's admission to the hospital, placing the resident at risk of impaired rights related to transfers and discharge. Findings included:- R23's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) included the following diagnoses: Parkinson's disease (a slowly progressive neurologic disorder characterized by resting tremors, rolling of the fingers, masklike faces, shuffling gait, muscle rigidity, and weakness), congestive heart failure (CHF-a condition with low heart output and the body becomes congested with fluid) and diabetes mellitus (DM-when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin is made, or the body cannot respond to the insulin). R23's EMR documented in the progress notes that the resident transferred to the hospital on [DATE]. R23's EMR lacked documentation of the Ombudsman being notified of the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-09-04 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
  Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  The facility reported a census of 26 residents. The sample of 14 residents included three residents reviewed for nutrition. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide ongoing assessment by the Registered Dietician (RD) for the effectiveness of interventions and impact of nausea and vomiting on nutritional status for Resident (R)12, who had experienced a significant weight loss and continued with insidious loss. This deficient practice placed the resident at risk for continued weight loss and malnutrition. Findings included:- R12's Electronic Health Records (EHR) Physician Orders (POS), dated 08/04/ 25 documented: diagnoses which included multiple sclerosis (MS- a progressive disease of the nerve fibers of the brain and spinal cord), spastic hemiplegia (paralysis of one side of the body) affecting right dominant side, cerebral infarct (stroke - sudden death of brain cells due to lack of oxygen caused by impaired blood flow to the brain by blockage or rupture of an artery to the brain), neuroleptic induced Parkinsonism (drug induced…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to ADVENA LIVING COMMUNITIES — 6 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 17 rows in the source record cover these 9 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 85% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $193K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in KS