No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Orchard Gardens

1600 S Woodlawn Blvd, Wichita, KS 67218 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 80 certified beds · (316) 691-9999 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citations on record (F0600, F0610) — most recent Sep 2025Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)1 immediate-jeopardy citation1 immediate-jeopardy citation CMS recorded as corrected before the inspection ended (past non-compliance)$20,677 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0610) — most recent Sep 2025
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
  • inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (50) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $20,677 in federal fines (most recent 2026-01-21)
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (66%) runs well above the national median (45%)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 2 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★★ 5/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
949 South Glendale Street, Parklane Shopping Center
Pharmacy
Walgreens0.6 mi
5505 E Harry St · (316) 689-0866 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
7100 E Harry St · (316) 358-7567 · Call to confirm hours
Park
6115 E Mount Vernon St · (316) 268-4361 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
6000 E Harry St · (316) 302-4613

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 2 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 2 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased25.3%17.9%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight2.0%4.9%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder1.4%1.6%0.9%worse
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.8%2.9%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms2.6%6.5%6.5%better
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury3.5%4.3%3.3%typical
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened11.6%16.2%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication28.9%23.2%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine93.8%95.5%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers5.1%4.4%4.7%typical
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control11.5%22.6%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table43.3%18.1%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication3.4%1.9%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine16.7%73.8%79.4%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.851.801.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.732.131.80typical

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

11.4%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
0.05U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.02hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.03hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
<0.01hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.05 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 2% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 7% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF11.4%CMS range 7.6–17.410.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identifiednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF staynot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsenednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.041.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.42
RN hours/ resident / day
0.53
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.68
Aide hours/ resident / day
2.63
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.34
RN hoursweekends
66.1%
Total nursing turnover
77.8%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 80 beds and averages 69.1 residents a day — about 86% occupied, or roughly 11 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.63 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.42 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.68 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.40 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 2.72 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.45 to 0.34 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 66% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

13
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-04-01)
16
at the previous standard inspection (2023-09-12)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

50 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 37 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-05-09 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility reported a census of 69 residents, with five residents identified and reviewed for elopement. Based on interview, observation, and record review the facility failed to ensure a safe and secure environment to prevent the elopement of cognitively impaired Resident (R) 1, identified at high risk for elopement. On 05/06/24 at 07:09 PM the charge nurse let R1 out the front doors of the building not realizing he was not allowed out the front doors to smoke. When R 1 went out the doors his WanderGuard (a bracelet that sets off an alarm when a resident wearing one attempts to exit the building without an escort) caused the alarm to activate, and the charge nurse located a CNA to turn off the alarm. The CNA did not check which resident cause the alarm to activate before or after turning off the alarm. The facility was not aware of R1 missing from the building until three hours later when the certified medication aide (CMA) could not find R1 to administer his 10:00 PM medications. After staff conducted a search and could not locate R1, they notified administrative staff at 10:45…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Immediate jeopardy · K2021-11-30 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — pattern
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility census totaled 65 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to protect female resident in the facility when staff failed to adequately monitor Resident (R)30 after an allegation of resident to resident sexual abuse (reported to the facility involving R30 and R7) on the evening of 11/18/21. Less than eight hours later, and after the facility implemented 15-minute checks, leading to a subsequent allegation of resident to resident sexual abuse alleging R30 went into R69's room for 30 to 45 minutes (as reported by R30) in the early morning of 11/19/21. R69 reported feeling unsafe and stated a man came into her room and she fought him off and said no. This deficient practice placed R69, and the other female residents in the facility in immediate jeopardy. Findings included: - The September 2021 Physician Order Summary Report (POS) revealed the following diagnoses: dementia without behavioral disturbance (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2026-01-21 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 72 residents. The sample included eight residents with three reviewed for falls. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure an environment free of accident hazards for Resident (R) 1. On 12/15/25 at 03:15 PM, per camera footage, Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) M propelled R1 in a wheelchair without the use of foot pedals, down an incline when the resident's right foot dropped under the wheelchair, where it became entangled, causing R1 to fall to the floor. This resulted in a right femur (thigh bone) fracture.Findings included:- R1's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) under the Physician's Orders, dated 01/08/26, documented a diagnosis of displaced fracture at the base of the neck of the right femur.R1's Quarterly Minimum Date Set (MDS), dated [DATE], revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, indicating intact cognition. R1 required substantial assistance to total staff dependence for most activities of daily living (ADL)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-21 · tag F0628 — isolated
    Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility had a census of 72 residents. The sample included eight residents, with three residents reviewed for involuntary discharge. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a complete recapitulation of Resident (R) 3's stays in the facility, including medication reconciliation, and further failed to ensure the involuntary discharge notice included the required information. Findings include:-R3's Electronic Health Record (EHR) documented a diagnosis of schizoaffective disorder (a mental disorder characterized by gross distortion of reality, disturbances of language and communication, and fragmentation of thought) and borderline intellectual functioning. R3's 09/22/25 admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) documented a Brief Interview Mental Status (BIMS) of 15, which indicated intact cognition. R3's MDS documented he had no depression, but he had verbal behavioral symptoms directed towards others during the look-back period. R3's MDS documented he required setup for activities of daily living (ADL) care. R3's MDS documented he had no plans for discharge and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-21 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility had a census of 72 residents. The sample included eight residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan with interventions to address the care for Resident (R) 2.Findings included:- R2's Electronic Medical Records (EMR), documented diagnoses which included suspected adrenal insufficiency (a condition where the adrenal glands don't produce enough essential hormones like cortisol and aldosterone, leading to symptoms such as severe fatigue, weakness, weight loss, abdominal pain, and low blood pressure, sometimes culminating in a life-threatening adrenal crisis), hypothyroidism (a condition characterized by decreased activity of the thyroid gland), myxedema (severe hypothyroidism), and cerebral infarction (stroke - sudden death of brain cells due to lack of oxygen caused by impaired blood flow to the brain by blockage or rupture of an artery to the brain).R2's 07/30/25 admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) documented R2 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 15, indicating intact cognition. R2 had…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-21 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility had a census of 72 residents. The sample included eight residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to prevent significant medication errors for Residents (R) 2 and R4, who did not receive medications as ordered.Findings included:- R2's Electronic Medical Records (EMR), documented diagnoses which included hypothyroidism (a condition characterized by decreased activity of the thyroid gland), myxedema (severe hypothyroidism), and cerebral infarction (stroke - sudden death of brain cells due to lack of oxygen caused by impaired blood flow to the brain by blockage or rupture of an artery to the brain). R2's 07/30/25 admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) documented R2 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 15, indicating intact cognition. R2 had a thyroid disorder. R2's Care Plan dated 08/12/25, documented R2 wished to stay in the facility and was a full code. The care plan lacked any additional information. R2's Encounter progress note dated 11/04/25, documented R2 had been taking levothyroxine sodium tablet 150 micrograms (mcg)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-09-03 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility reported a census of 70 residents, and one main kitchen. Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to prepare and serve food under sanitary conditions to prevent the potential for food borne bacteria. This placed the residents at risk for food borne illnesses. Findings included:- During an observation on 09/03/25 at 09:53 AM, several dead roaches and live roaches were observed in different stages of life throughout the kitchen on the floor. The roaches were observed behind and on the side of the refrigerators, freezers, under the clean dish storage rack, under the meal prep counter, behind doors, and in the dry storage room. Dietary Staff CC said she had seen several roaches and had reported the concern to Dietary Staff BB, Certified Dietary Manager (CDM). Additionally, Dietary Staff CC said a person would come into the kitchen weekly to try to control all the roaches. Further observation revealed two garbage cans with no lids on them in the kitchen. Dietary Staff CC reported the lids were off, as it was easier to throw items away.During an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-09-03 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility reported a census of 70 residents. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain a clean, comfortable and homelike environment in two of the three shower rooms when the facility failed to ensure the walls remained free of any mildew, or unknown and unintended substances. Additionally, the facility failed to ensure the smoking courtyard and main entrance entry way area was maintained in a sanitary manner that included proper disposal of cigarette butts. This placed the affected residents at risk for decreased quality of life. Findings included:- Observation on 09/03/25 at 08:20 AM of the exterior entry way area to the facility revealed dozens of used cigarette butts littered on the ground in the area. The area did not contain a cigarette receptacle (a device used to extinguish and dispose of cigarette waste in a sanitary manner).Observation on 09/03/25 at 08:25 AM of the smoking courtyard area revealed dozens of cigarette butts littered on the ground. The courtyard contained several plastic and/or metal cigarette…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-09-03 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility reported a census of 70 residents. The sample included 12 residents with six residents reviewed for abuse. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R) 1 remained free from verbal abuse and mistreatment. This deficient practice placed the resident at risk for fear and decreased quality of life. Findings included:- R1's Electronic Health Record (EHR) documented diagnoses that included chronic pain and major depressive disorder (a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest)R1's 05/20/25 admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) documented a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, which indicated intact cognition. The assessment documented R1 utilized a walker or wheelchair for locomotion and required supervision or touching assistance with all activities of daily living (ADL) except oral hygiene, which required setup or clean-up assistance, and eating, which was performed independently.The 05/20/25 ADL Functional / Rehabilitation Potential Care Area Assessment documented R1 needed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-04-01 · tag F0730 — widespread
    Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility reported a census of 66 residents. Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to complete an annual performance review at least once every 12 months for five Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) reviewed, to ensure adequate appropriate care and services provided to the residents of the facility. The facility identified five CNAs employed for more than a 12-month period. This placed the residents at risk for decreased quality of care. Findings included: - A review of employee files on 04/01/25 at 02:55 PM revealed a lack of performance evaluations signed by management for five of five CNA staff who had been employed over one year, including CNA S, CNA II, CNA LL, CNA MM, and CNA NN. During an interview on 04/01/25 at 03:05 PM, Administrative Staff A reported that producing the requested performance evaluations for CNA staff would be difficult and stated that he did know that annual performance evaluations for the CNA staff were required. The facility's policy Performance Evaluations dated 10/2024 documented the job performance of each employee shall be reviewed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-04-01 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility reported a census of 66 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, and serve food in a sanitary manner to prevent possible food-borne illness to the residents of the facility. This placed the residents at risk for foodborne illness. Findings included: On 03/26/25 at 11:01 AM during an initial tour of the main kitchen and refrigerator storage areas with Dietary Staff J, the following areas of concern were observed: One tray of chocolate pie dessert, uncovered and undated, located in the fridge. Fifteen individually portioned cranberry sauces dated 3/17/25 located in the fridge. Ten barbeque-ranch dressings, individually portioned, and dated 03/07/25 located in the fridge. Staff's personal food items with no date were located in the fridge. One sealed plastic container of pumpkin pie filling dated 03/12/25 is located in the fridge. Eleven individually staff portioned individual Apple Jelly dated 3/14/25 located in the fridge. One box of bacon unsealed and undated located in the fridge. One bag of mozzarella cheese…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-04-01 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — widespread
    Ensure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility reported a census of 66 residents. Five Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) staff, CNA S, CNA II, CNA LL, CNA MM, and CNA NN, who worked in the facility for over a year, were reviewed for the required annual in-service training. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop, implement, and permanently maintain an in-service training program for CNAs with the required topics and no less than 12 hours per year. Five CNAs lacked the required training topics, and five CNAs lacked the required 12 hours per year of in-service training. Findings included: - On 04/01/25 at 02:55 PM, a review of training records for five CNAs employed by the facility for more than one year revealed all five CNAs had less than 12 hours of documented in-service training for the previous 12 months. The records that were provided by the facility and reviewed were from the year 2023. The records did indicate that on 03/12/25 CNA S and CNA II had Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation training was the only record located for education. On 04/01/25 at 02:55 PM, a review of training records for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-01 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility reported a census of 66 residents. The sample included 18 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to promote a sanitary, homelike environment. This deficient practice had the potential for decreased psychosocial well-being and impaired safety and comfort for the affected residents. Findings include: - During an observation on 03/26/25 at 11:38 AM, Resident (R) 17 and R6's room had no threshold noted in the entrance of the room, the windowsill was missing a tile and the standing floor fan was missing the front cover. During an observation on 03/26/25 at 11:39 AM the 300 hallway had large gouges missing from the wall and several areas of baseboard peeling back noted in the hallway. Observation revealed built-up dirt on the wall and floor cover. During an observation on 03/26/25 at 11:45 AM, R8 and R18's room had a ceiling tile missing. The built-in wardrobe closet and drawers had chipped paint and broken areas noted on the bottom drawers. Additionally, the windowsill tile was covered with black electrical tape. During an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 37 citations
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-01 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 66 residents. The sample included 18 residents, with six residents observed for accidents and hazards. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a safe environment free from accident hazards when multiple residents had lighters in their rooms. Additionally, R45 had unsecured medications and R52 had an unsecured 1.75-liter bottle of vodka along with firecrackers and a two-inch pocketknife. Additionally, the facility failed to store chemicals in a secure safe manner. These failures placed the affected residents at risk for preventable accidents and related injuries. Findings included: - During an observation on 03/26/25 at 11:42 AM across from room [ROOM NUMBER] there was a workstation with a sink and an unlocked cupboard under the sink that had a spring-loaded mouse trap, a full gallon bottle of drain cleaner, a gallon bottle of disinfectant cleaner with approximately 200 ml of clear liquid in the bottle, and a one-quart spray bottle of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-01 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility reported a census of 66 residents. The sample included 18 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff utilized acceptable infection control practices to mitigate the spread of infections when staff failed to cover clean clothes left in the folding area, and under areas with noted debris and insulation. The facility staff failed to utilize enhanced barrier precautions (EBP-a set of infection control measures that use gowns and gloves to reduce the spread of multidrug-resistant organisms [MDROs] in nursing homes) when providing a dressing change for Resident (R) 52 and additionally failed to use EBP for R39 when staff administered a tube feeding (administration of nutritionally balanced liquefied foods or nutrients through a tube). The facility further failed to use proper hand hygiene and standard infection control practices for R14 and R18 when staff failed to complete proper hand hygiene and cleansing during peri-care. This deficient practice had the potential to spread possible infections to the residents in the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-01 · tag F0582 — isolated
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility reported a census of 66 residents which included a sample of three residents identified by the facility with Medicare Part A stay termination of benefits before exhaustion of Medicare Part A 100-day benefit period. Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to provide two residents with the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) form CMS- 10055 Skilled Nursing Facility Advanced Beneficiary Notice [ABN], which provides the recipient with the information related to the right to choose continued services and associated charges for continued skilled services after termination of Medicare Part A services for Resident (R) 13 and R121. This placed the residents at risk for uninformed decisions and unanticipated costs regarding skilled services. Findings included: - A review of R13's Skilled Nursing Facility (SNF) Beneficiary Protection Notification Review, revealed the resident started Medicare Part A services on 12/08/24. He was discharged from Medicare A services on 01/03/25 and remained in the facility. The facility did not provide the resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-01 · tag F0625 — isolated
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 66 residents. The sample included 18 residents with three residents reviewed for hospitalization. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a bed hold notice to two residents, Resident (R) 28, and R69, and/or their representative at the time of the residents' transfers to the hospital. This placed the residents at risk for impaired ability to return to the facility in the same room. Findings included: - R28's Electronic Health Record (EHR) docuemnted R28 was admitted to the hospital on [DATE]. R28's EMR lacked evidence the facility provided a bed hold notice for the transfer/discharge to the hospital. R69's EHR documented that R69 was admitted to the hospital on [DATE]. R69's EMR lacked evidence the facility provided a bed hold notice for the transfer/discharge to the hospital. During an interview on 03/31/25 at 05:36 AM, Licensed Nurse (LN) O reported that she would not complete a bed hold form when a resident was transferred to the hospital.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-01 · tag F0645 — isolated
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 66 with 18 in the sample, which included Resident (R)2 reviewed for Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR). Based on observation, interviews, and record review the facility failed to obtain a PASARR Level 2 for R2. This placed R2 at risk for unidentified care needs and impaired quality of care. Findings include: - The Electronic Health Records (EHR) for R2 included diagnoses of suicidal ideations (the thoughts, fantasies, or contemplations about ending one's own life), auditory hallucinations (sensory experiences of hearing sounds that are not present in the external environment), major depressive disorder (a common and serious mental health condition characterized by persistent feelings of sadness, hopelessness, and loss of interest or pleasure in activities), generalized anxiety disorder (a mental health condition characterized by excessive, persistent, and uncontrollable worry about a wide range of events or activities), schizoaffective disorder (a mental health…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-01 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 66 residents. The sample included 18 residents reviewed for comprehensive care plans. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to review and revise comprehensive care plans for Residents (R)43 related to bathing. This placed the resident at risk for poor hygiene due to uncommunicated care needs. Findings Included: - R43's Electronic Health Records (EHR) Physician Orders (POS), dated 01/07/25 documented diagnoses which included disorientation (confusion), dementia (condition that causes a decline in memory, thinking, and other cognitive abilities making it harder to perform everyday tasks) with behavioral disturbances, generalized anxiety disorder (mental health disorder characterized by feelings of left artificial knee joint replacement, atrial fibrillation (irregular heartbeat), insomnia, (inability to sleep), and psychotic disorder (a mental disorder characterized by disconnection from reality) with hallucinations (a perception of having seen,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-01 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 66 residents. The sample included 18 residents with seven dependent residents reviewed for activities of daily living (ADLs). Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide necessary services in accordance with their preferences and in keeping with their plan of care for Resident (R)43, R51, and R28. This placed the affected residents at risk for decreased quality of care. Findings Included: - R43's Electronic Health Records (EHR) Physician Orders (POS), dated 01/07/25 documented diagnoses which included disorientation (confusion), dementia (condition that causes a decline in memory, thinking, and other cognitive abilities making it harder to perform everyday tasks) with behavioral disturbances, generalized anxiety disorder (mental health disorder characterized by feelings of left artificial knee joint replacement, atrial fibrillation (irregular heartbeat), insomnia, (inability to sleep), and psychotic disorder (a mental disorder characterized…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-01 · tag F0909 — failed to maintain a comfortable temperature — isolated
    Regularly inspect all bed frames, mattresses, and bed rails (if any) for safety; and all bed rails and mattresses must attach safely to the bed frame.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility reported a census of 66 residents which included 18 residents sampled, which included two residents reviewed for functional equipment. Based on interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R)29 and R2's bed was in safe and operable condition. This deficient practice placed the residents at risk for discomfort and decreased safety. Findings include: - Observation on 03/26/25 at 02:49 PM revealed that R2's bed frame appeared to be broken, and the bed would not sit level. The bed was a crank style. Observation on 03/27/25 at 10:40 AM revealed that the remote R29's bed was under it and stuck in the frame. The sheathing was stripped from the wires the wires were unraveled. The bed rested almost completely on the ground. During an interview on 03/27/25 at 10:40 AM, R29 reported that the bed would go up and down but the head of the bed would not work to be raised or lowered. During an interview on 04/02/25 at 4:00 PM, Maintenance/Housekeeping EE said the remote to R29's bed should have been unplugged for safety and replaced. During an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-20 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 66 residents with one resident sampled for sexual abuse. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to report an allegation of abuse by one Resident (R)1, when he made an allegation of sexual abuse. Findings included: - Review of Resident (R)1's electronic medical record (EMR) revealed a diagnosis of schizoaffective disorder, bipolar type (a mental health disorder that is marked by a combination of schizophrenia symptoms, such as hallucinations [the apparent perception of something not present] or delusions [a false belief or judgment about external reality], and mood disorder symptoms, such as depression or mania). The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14, indicating intact cognition. He had no delirium or psychosis and had rejection of care and wandering one to three days of the assessment period. He took antipsychotics (medication used to treat psychosis)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-09-12 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility reported a census of 60 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, and serve food under sanitary conditions to prevent the spread of food borne illnesses to the residents of the facility. Findings included: - During an initial tour of the kitchen on 09/07/23 at 09:47 AM, the following areas of concern were noted: 1. The inside of the microwave had several areas of dried on food. 2. The dish cart, which held clean plates, had dried on food substances. 3. The shelf above the steam table had dried food debris. 4. A large plastic container of brown sugar had food debris on top of the lid. 5. The reach-in refrigerator had food debris on the bottom. 6. Two wire shelves in the reach-in refrigerator had the protective coating peeling off, making the area unsanitizable. 7. A metal container which held sliced tomatoes and onions in a reach-in refrigerator was not covered. 8. A kitchen drawer containing specialized eating utensils had food debris. 9. A kitchen drawer containing menus had food debris. 10. Five containers of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-09-12 · tag F0851 — widespread
    Electronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility reported a census of 60 residents. Based on interview and record review the facility failed to submit complete and accurate staffing information to the federal regulatory agency through Payroll Based Journaling (PBJ) when the facility failed to submit staffing hourly data for all nursing personnel by the required deadline. Findings included: - The PBJ reported by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid services (CMS) for Fiscal Year (FY) 2023 quarter one (October to December) showed the facility had no licensed nurses in the facility for the entire three-month period from 10/01/22 to 12/31/22. On 09/10/23 at 07:00 PM review of the staff clock in sheets and schedules for the PBJ for the FY quarter one 2023 (Oct to Dec) revealed adequate nurses for 8-hour RN coverage and 24-hour nurses listed every day. The clock in's verified there was no concerns noted with scheduling. On 09/07/23 at 09:17 AM interview with Consultant GG reported when reviewing the PBJ for the FY quarter 1 2023 (Oct to Dec) the report showed they had no licensed nurses in the building for the entire 3-month…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-09-12 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility reported a census of 60 residents with 18 selected for review. Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to sanitize a multi-resident use glucometer (a device that measures the amount of sugar in the blood) in an appropriate manner, failed to provide sanitary catheter care of two Residents (R)28 and R15, failed to provide sanitary dressing changes for R53, R64, and R15, failed to maintain oxygen tubing in a sanitary manner for R21, and failed to store personal protective equipment in a sanitary manner. Findings included: - Observation on 09/07/23 at 11:09 AM revealed Licensed Nurse (LN) I obtained blood glucose level from Resident (R) 50 with a glucometer. LN I then obtained an alcohol swab to clean the glucometer. Interview at that time revealed seven residents on the unit required blood glucose levels with the glucometer. LN I stated she did not know of any other method to clean the glucometer. Observation on 09/07/23 at 11:15 AM, revealed LN G was about to obtain a blood glucose level from an unsampled resident. LN G stated that she…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-09-12 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — widespread
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility reported a census of 60 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide necessary maintenance services for the kitchen floor and floors on the resident 400 halls and one resident room on 400 hall to provide a safe, functional, and sanitary environment. Findings included: - During an initial tour of the kitchen on 09/07/23 at 09:47 AM, revealed the kitchen floor had multiple areas of broken, cracked, and missing tiles. On 09/12/23 at 10:16 AM, Dietary staff BB confirmed the kitchen floor was in poor condition and needed to be replaced. The facility lacked a policy regarding upkeep of the kitchen floor. The facility failed to provide necessary maintenance services for the kitchen floor to provide a safe, functional, and sanitary environment. - Observation on 09/06/23 at 02:30 PM through 09/12/23 revealed the floors on the resident 400 hall contained multiple areas of discolorations, black streaks, dirt, and accumulation of grime in the corners of doorway thresholds. The floor in a resident room contained six tiles with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-09-12 · tag F0887 — pattern
    Educate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 60 residents. Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure residents had opportunities for COVID boosters. Findings included: - Review of Resident (R) 15's medical record, immunization tab, revealed the resident received two doses of the COVID vaccine with the last dose received on 04/01/21. The resident signed a COVID declination on 06/21/23 with no other indication that the facility offered the vaccine booster until 06/21/23. Review of R38's immunization medical record revealed the resident received two doses of COVID vaccine with the last dose received 01/29/21. The resident signed a COVID declination on 06/21/23 with no other indication that the facility offered the vaccine booster until 06/21/23. Review of R 24's immunization medical record revealed the resident received two doses of the COVID vaccine with the last dose 01/29/21. The resident signed a COVID declination on 06/21/23 with no other indication that the facility offered the vaccine booster…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-12 · tag F0557 — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 60 residents with 18 selected for review, which included two residents reviewed for personal property. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a completed inventory for one Resident (R)119. Findings included: - Review of Resident (R)119's Physician Order Sheet, dated 12/02/22, revealed diagnoses included paraplegia (paralysis characterized by motor or sensory loss in the lower limbs and trunk), anxiety (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty and irrational fear) mood disorder, and post-traumatic stress disorder,(PTSD- a psychiatric disorder characterized by an acute emotional response to a traumatic event or situation involving severe environmental stress, such as natural disaster, military combat, serious automobile accident, airplane crash or physical torture). The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], assessed the resident with a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, which…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-12 · tag F0636 — isolated
    Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 60 residents with 18 residents sampled. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete a comprehensive assessment for one Resident (R)50, by the failure to complete triggered Care Area Assessments (CAA). Findings included: - The Physician Order Sheet (POS), dated 08/29/23, for Resident (R)50, included the following diagnoses: major depressive disorder with severe psychotic symptoms (MDD-major mood disorder characterized by a gross impairment in reality), anxiety (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty, and irrational fear) and dementia (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion). The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of three, indicating severe cognitive impairment. He had rejection of care one to three days and received an antipsychotic (drugs used to treat psychosis-related conditions and symptoms) and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-12 · tag F0642 — isolated
    Ensure a qualified health professional conducts resident assessments.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    The facility census totaled 60 residents with 18 included in the sample. Based on interview and record review the facility failed to complete discharge tracking assessments when two residents were discharged from the facility. Resident (R) 17, R25. Findings included: - Review of the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) for R17 revealed the resident discharged from the facility on 04/27/23. No Discharge Tracking Minimum Data Set (MDS) was completed for the resident. Review of the EMR for R25 revealed the resident discharged from the facility on 04/24/23. No Discharge MDS was completed for the resident. Interview on 09/11/23 at 2:30 PM Administrative Nurse E reported she did not complete MDS discharge assessments for these residents. Review of the Resident Assessment Instrument User Manual dated 10/19 revealed a Discharge Tracking Assessment is a federally mandated assessment to be completed no later than 14 days following discharge from the facility. The facility failed to complete discharge tracking assessments when two residents were discharged from the facility.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-12 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility census totaled 60 residents with 18 included in the sample. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan for two Residents (R)45 regarding pain and R65 for the lack of communication between the facility and the dialysis center. Findings included: - Resident (R)45's Signed Physician Orders dated 07/01/23 revealed the following diagnoses: osteoporosis with current pathological fracture of right ankle and foot (abnormal loss of bone density and deterioration of bone tissue with an increased fracture risk), alcohol abuse and dependence, major depressive disorder (abnormal emotional state characterized by exaggerated feelings of sadness, worthlessness, emptiness and hopelessness), schizoaffective disorder (psychotic disorder characterized by gross distortion of reality, disturbances of language and communication and fragmentation of thought), and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD- progressive and irreversible condition characterized…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-12 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY - Resident (R) 21's signed Physician Orders dated 07/01/23 revealed the following diagnoses: Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD - progressive and irreversible condition characterized by diminished lung capacity and difficulty or discomfort in breathing), diabetes mellitus (when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin is made or the body cannot respond to the insulin), morbid obesity (the state or condition of being very fat or overweight), and chronic resp failure (lungs are unable to provide the body with enough oxygen). The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14, indicating intact cognition. The resident required total assistance of two to three staff for all daily cares. The resident had shortness of breath with all activities. The resident required oxygen (O2) and continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP). The Care Area Assessment (CAA) dated 05/14/23 for Activities of daily living (ADL) revealed the resident required…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-12 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 60 residents with 18 residents sampled, including three residents reviewed for Activities of Daily Living (ADL's). Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide appropriate ADL assistance to one dependent Resident (R)28, regarding facial shaving and nail care. Findings included: - The Physician Order Sheet (POS), dated 08/29/23, documented Resident (R)28 had a diagnosis of Parkinson's disease (slowly progressive neurologic disorder characterized by resting tremor, rolling of the fingers, masklike faces, shuffling gait, muscle rigidity and weakness). The Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14, indicating intact cognition. He required total assistance of two staff for personal hygiene. The Activity of Daily Living (ADL) Functional/Rehabilitation Potential Care Area Assessment (CAA), documented the resident had impaired ADL function related to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-12 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 60 residents with 18 selected for review, which included three residents reviewed for urinary tract infection/urinary catheter. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide sanitary catheter care as ordered by the physician for one Resident (R)15. Findings included: - Review of Resident (R)15's Physician Order Sheet, dated 08/29/23, revealed diagnoses included hemiplegia (weakness on one side of the body), and hemiparesis (paralysis on one side of the body), chronic pain syndrome, cerebral infarction (stroke), heart valve replacement and diabetes (when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin made, or the body cannot respond to the insulin). The Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], assessed the resident with a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, which indicated intact cognition. The resident was dependent on staff for toileting and had an indwelling catheter. The resident had weakness on one side of his body…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-12 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility census totaled 60 residents with 18 included in the sample, and one reviewed for respiratory care. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that Resident (R) 21's oxygen (O2) tubing was maintained and documented, and the resident received the ordered O2 therapy. Findings included: - Resident (R) 21's signed physician orders dated 07/01/23 revealed the following diagnoses: Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD - progressive and irreversible condition characterized by diminished lung capacity and difficulty or discomfort in breathing), diabetes mellitus (when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin is made or the body cannot respond to the insulin), morbid obesity (the state or condition of being very fat or overweight), chronic respiratory failure (lungs are unable to provide the body with enough oxygen). The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14, indicating intact cognition.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-12 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 60 residents with 18 residents sampled, including one resident reviewed for dialysis (the clinical purification of blood by dialysis, as a substitute for the normal function of the kidney). Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to ensure coordination of care between the dialysis center and the facility, for one Resident (R) 65, regarding a lack of regular dialysis communication sheets, with the facility. Findings included: - Review of Resident (R)65's Electronic Medical Record (EMR), revealed a diagnosis of end stage renal disease (a condition in which the kidneys do not function normally and requires external support to meet the daily requirements of life). The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14, indicating intact cognition. He received dialysis (the clinical purification of blood by dialysis, as a substitute for the normal function of the kidney)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-12 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 60 residents with 18 selected for review and five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff followed up on the pharmacy recommendation to complete the Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS) for three Residents (R) 15, R28 and R50 to ensure the residents did not experience adverse effects from psychoactive (medications used to treat severe mental disorders) medications. Findings included: - Review of Resident (R)15's Physician Order Sheet, dated 08/29/23, revealed diagnoses of schizophrenia (psychotic disorder characterized by gross distortion of reality, disturbances of language and communication and fragmentation of thought), hemiplegia (weakness on one side of the body), hemiparesis (paralysis on one side of the body), and diabetes (when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin made, or the body cannot respond to the insulin). The Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-12 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 60 residents with 18 residents sampled, including five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to monitor three Residents (R)15, R 28 and R 50 for use of antipsychotic medications (drugs used to treat psychosis-related conditions and symptoms). Findings included: - The Physician Order Sheet (POS), dated 08/29/23, for Resident (R)28, documented a diagnosis of major depressive disorder (MDD-major mood disorder). The Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14, indicating intact cognition. He received an antipsychotic (drugs used to treat psychosis-related conditions and symptoms) seven of the seven days of the assessment period. The Psychotropic Drug Use Care Area Assessment (CAA), dated 06/23/23, documented the resident took medications with a black box warning (BBW--a warning required certain medications…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2021-11-30 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility reported a census of 65 residents who all received their meals from one main kitchen. Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to prepare and serve food in a sanitary manner by the observation of roaches in the food prep area, on steam table and on plates used for the noon meal. This had the potential to affect all residents in the facility. Findings included: - Observation on 11/18/21 at approximately 08:00 AM revealed a small live cockroach crawling off a tray of water and coffee dietary staff brought to the conference room. Observation on 11/22/21 at approximately 09:30 to 09:45 AM revealed three small, live cock cockroaches crawling in the hallway outside of the kitchen. During tour of the kitchen on 11/22/21 at 11:30 AM Dietary Staff C pureed salisbury steak and vegetables for four residents. During the process of pureeing the vegetables a live cockroach crawled across the cutting board where the utensils used by the staff and soiled dishes sat. DS C removed the cockroach using a napkin after carrying the cutting board to the sink.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2021-11-30 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — widespread
    Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility reported a census of 65 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program to ensure the facility was free of live cockroaches. Findings included: - Observation on 11/18/21 at approximately 08:00 AM revealed a small live cockroach crawling off a tray of water and coffee dietary staff brought to the conference room. Observation on 11/22/21 at approximately 09:30 - 09:45 AM revealed three small, live cock cockroaches crawling in the hallway outside of the kitchen and near the east nurses' station. Observation during tour of the kitchen on 11/22/21 at 11:30 AM while dietary staff C pureed Salisbury steak and vegetables for four residents, a live cockroach crawled across a cutting board including utensils being used by the staff. Another cockroach crawled on the floor and was killed by the surveyor. During meal service, two cockroaches crawled across and in between the plates, another large cockroach crawled across the steam table in front of the food, another cockroach was on the side of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2021-11-30 · tag F0638 — pattern
    Assure that each resident’s assessment is updated at least once every 3 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility census totaled 65 residents with 11 residents reviewed for Minimum Data Set assessments later than 120 days, with no assessment completed. Based on interview and record review the facility failed to complete Quarterly MDS assessments as required by State and Federal regulations not less frequently than once every three months for 10 residents who had quarterly assessments due and not completed. Resident (R) 7, R9, R8, R3, R6, R5, R2, R14 and R4. Findings included: - On 11/22/21 at 10:46 AM the Electronic Medical Record revealed the following Quarterly MDS assessments no completed for the following residents and dates due: R3's quarterly MDS due on 10/05/21, not completed. R2's quarterly MDS due on 10/05/21, not completed. R4's quarterly MDS due on 10/07/21, not completed. R5's quarterly MDS due on 10/07/21, not completed. R6's quarterly MDS due on 10/08/21, not completed. R7's quarterly MDS due on 10/14/21, not completed. R14's quarterly MDS due on 10/14/21, not completed. R9's quarterly MDS due on 10/15/21, not completed. R8's quarterly MDS due on 10/15/21, not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-11-30 · tag F0553 — failed to let residents help plan their care — isolated
    Allow resident to participate in the development and implementation of his or her person-centered plan of care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 65 residents with 16 included in the sample. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to include the resident in the development and planning of the resident's care plan and failed to have regular care plan meetings for Resident (R) 49. Findings included: - Resident (R) 49's signed Physician Orders dated 10/14/21 revealed the following diagnoses: diabetes mellitus (when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin is made or the body cannot respond to the insulin), schizoaffective disorder (psychotic disorder characterized by gross distortion of reality, disturbances of language and communication and fragmentation of thought), low vision both eyes (unable to see because of injury, disease, or a congenital condition). The Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, indicating intact cognition. The resident had no behaviors. The resident required supervision and limited assistance of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-11-30 · tag F0636 — isolated
    Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility census totaled 65 residents with 11 reviewed for Minimum Data Set assessments later than 120 days with no assessment completed. Based on interview and record review the facility failed to complete a comprehensive MDS assessment by the due date of 10/19/21 for Resident (R)10. Findings included: - Review of R10's Electronic Medical Record revealed the resident had a Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) completed on 07/19/21. The resident had an annual MDS started on 10/19/21, however the assessment was not completed, as required. Interview on 11/22/21 at 11:00 AM Administrative Staff A reported the facility had no MDS coordinator but hired one who will start that position on 12/11/21. She thought another facility was helping part time to do the MDS assessments and would have to contact the corporate office to let them know assessments were not being done. Review of the July 2017 facility policy named MDS Completion and Submission Time Frame revealed the facility would conduct and submit resident assessments in accordance with current federal and state submission timeframes.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-11-30 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 65 residents with 16 sampled which included two for respiratory care. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide safe and sanitary care for oxygen tubing to help prevent the development and transmission of diseases and infections for both Resident (R) 64, and R69. Findings Included: - R64's Electronic Health Record (EHR) documented the diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD, progressive and irreversible condition characterized by diminished lung capacity and difficulty or discomfort in breathing). The 02/08/21 admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) documented a Brief Interview for Mental status (BIMS) of 15, indicating intact cognition. The 02/02/21 Care Plan documented R64 had COPD. Staff were to monitor R64 for signs or symptoms of acute respiratory insufficiency and respiratory infection. R64 had oxygen (O2) therapy, as needed (PRN). The EHR documented on 02/01/21 R64 had an order for O2 therapy, O2 tubing care, and level of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-11-30 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility census totaled 65 residents, with 16 included in the sample, and five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services by the failue of staff to administer insulin (a hormone which regulates blood sugar) according to the physician orders to Resident (R)51. Findings Included: - The Physician Orders in the Electronic Health Record (EHR) documented R51 with a diagnosis of type 2 diabetes (when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin is made, or the body cannot respond to the insulin). The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of nine, which indicated moderately impaired cognition. R51 received insulin daily. The Quarterly MDS dated 09/24/21 documented a BIMS score of six, which indicated severely impaired cognition. R51 received insulin daily. The 03/19/2021 Care Plan documented R51 had diabetes mellitus. Interventions…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-11-30 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 65 residents, with 16 included in the sample, and five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure the pharmacist identified and reported missing documentation concerning the lack of administration of Tresiba (very long acting insulin) insulin (a hormone which regulates blood sugar) for R51 and missing blood sugar documentation for R11. Findings included: - The Physician Orders in the Electronic Health Record (EHR) documented R51 with a diagnosis of type 2 diabetes (when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin is made, or the body cannot respond to the insulin). The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of nine, which indicated moderately impaired cognition. R51 received insulin daily. The Quarterly MDS dated 09/24/21 documented a BIMS score of six, which indicated severely impaired cognition. R51 received insulin daily.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-11-30 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility census totaled 65 residents, with 16 included in the sample, and five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure the adequate monitoring of insulin, when staff did not obtain physician ordered blood glucose (blood sugar) levels for three diabetic residents: Resident (R)11, R29 and R49. The facility also failed to ensure adequate monitoring of antihypertensive medication when staff did not obtain pulses prior to administration of Carvedilol for R29. Findings included: - The signed November 2020 Physician Order Summary (POS) for R11 revealed a diagnosis of diabetes mellitus (when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin is made, or the body cannot respond to the insulin.) The Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, indicating intact cognition and R11 received insulin daily in the seven-day review period. The Quarterly MDS dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-11-30 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 65 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to properly date an opened tuberculin vial (a purified protein derivative used in a skin test to help diagnose tuberculosis infection in persons at increased risk of developing active disease). The facility further failed to remove a package of two promethazine (used to treat allergy symptoms, nausea and vomiting, or used a sedative to help with sleep) suppositories (medication that is inserted into the rectum to be broken down and absorbed by the body) with an expiration date of [DATE]. Findings included: - An observation of the facility's east and west medication rooms on [DATE] at 09:25 AM revealed a tuberculin test vial opened with no date on the box or vial in the east medication room and a package of two promethazine suppositories with an expiration date of [DATE] in the west medication room. On [DATE] at 01:36 PM Administrative Nurse B stated she expected opened vials of medication to be…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-11-30 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility reported a census of 65 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure nursing staff use Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) appropriately to reduce the risk of spread of infectious diseases. Findings Included: - On 11/18/21 at 08:11 AM, observation revealed Licensed Nurse (LN) E entered R64's room with just a mask on. R64 was on Transmission Based Precautions (TBP, the second tier of basic infection control and are to be used in addition to Standard Precautions) from her recent hospital stay. LN E entered the room and talked to the resident, put R64's O2 mask on and adjusted it. LN E then left the room and used hand sanitizer from the hall dispenser. There was a sign instructing the staff to don PPE and a PPE supply cart located outsideof R64's room. There were 2 bins in R64's room for trash and linens. With the TBP sign still posted outside of R64's room, on 11/22/21 at 09:30 AM, observation revealed CNA F entered R64's room without donning the proper PPE (gown and gloves). When the CNA F exited the room, she reported she…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2025-04-01 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — widespread
    Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    The facility reported a census of 66 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain and/or dispose of garbage and refuse properly, and in a sanitary condition, ensuring the lids were down to cover the disposed waste. Findings included: - An initial tour of the outside trash dumpsters on 03/26/25 at 12:36 PM with Dietary Staff J revealed three bags of trash were lying next to a portable dumpster with no lid. Two doors were open on one out of the two stationary dumpsters. On 03/26/25 at 12:36 PM, Dietary Staff J revealed he was not aware of the requirement to have trash covered and that it included a portable dumpster. The facility's policy Food-Related Garbage and Refuse Disposal dated 01/2024 revealed that outside dumpsters provided by garbage pickup services will be kept closed and free of surrounding litter.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$20,677 in federal fines across 2 penalties.

  • $11,362 — penalty dated 2026-01-21
  • $9,315 — penalty dated 2024-05-09

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to ADVENA LIVING COMMUNITIES — 6 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 51.3-0.3 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 51.5-0.5 vs chain
Staffing 1 of 52.0-1.0 vs chain
Quality measures 2 of 51.7+0.3 vs chain
The other 5 homes this chain runs (chain average 1.3★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
GREENFIELD, MICHAELIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST25%since 04/01/2019
NOVOTNY, MICHELLEIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 04/01/2019
NOVOTNY, WILLIAMIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 04/01/2019
NEW PARADIGM SOLUTIONS INCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/01/2019
BRYANT, RODNEYIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/01/2020
HARRISON, NATHANIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/03/2025
CORNERSTONE EMPLOYMENT SOLUTIONS INCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 04/01/2019

CMS files one row per role, so the 14 rows in the source record cover these 7 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$6.2M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+2.5%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$324K
Related-party expense5% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 93%Medicare 5%Other / private 1%

About 93% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $324K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$245per resident / day
operating cost
$7,450per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$251per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in KS

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Kansas Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Kansas
$8,669/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$9,064/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,975/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 175452. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-04-01, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next