No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Advena Living At Fountainview

601 N Rose Hill Road, Rose Hill, KS 67133 · For profit - Corporation · 50 certified beds · (316) 776-2194 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (316) 776-2194 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited Nov 2023Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)1 actual-harm citation$30,566 in federal fines1 Medicare payment denial
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Nov 2023
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has 1 actual-harm citation
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (35) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $30,566 in federal fines (most recent 2023-11-15)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (72%) runs well above the national median (45%)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

3/5
CMS overall
3 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 3 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 2 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
101 E Prairie Point Ct · (316) 733-5315 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
323 N Rose Hill Rd · (316) 776-1100 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
17898 SW County Line Rd
Park
562 Redwood Dr · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 2 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 2 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased22.8%17.9%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight2.7%4.9%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder3.7%1.6%0.9%worse
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection1.2%2.9%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms2.9%6.5%6.5%better
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury6.5%4.3%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened14.5%16.2%16.1%typical
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication26.0%23.2%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine98.0%95.5%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers5.7%4.4%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control23.5%22.6%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table29.8%18.1%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.0%1.9%1.4%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days0.861.801.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.892.131.80typical

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

10.9%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
0.18U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.09hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.09hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
<0.01hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.18 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 19% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 12% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.9%CMS range 6.6–16.210.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.821.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.45
RN hours/ resident / day
0.51
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.22
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.18
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.41
RN hoursweekends
72.2%
Total nursing turnover
87.5%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 50 beds and averages 43.7 residents a day — about 87% occupied, or roughly 6 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.18 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.45 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.22 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.71 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.37 on weekdays — 20% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.47 to 0.41 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 72% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

6
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-01-23)
21
at the previous standard inspection (2023-01-23)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

35 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 24 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · G2023-11-15 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 44 residents with seven residents selected for review, including two residents reviewed for allegations of abuse. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff provided a safe environment, free from abuse for Resident (R)1 and R7. During cares on 10/26/23, Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) M grabbed R1 by the arm, which resulted in an injury to R1's left arm near her wrist, which required steri-strips (thin adhesive bandage used to close wounds or cuts) for wound closure. During cares for R7, CNA M was verbally rude and physically forced a shirt on him, which he voiced he did not want to wear. Findings included: - The Medical Diagnosis tab for R1 included diagnoses of paraplegia (paralysis characterized by motor or sensory loss in the lower limbs and trunk), myopathy (muscle weakness due to a dysfunction in the muscle fibers), general anxiety disorder (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty, and irrational…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-01-23 · tag F0730 — widespread
    Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility reported a census of 47 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to conduct annual performance reviews for five of five direct care staff reviewed, to ensure the residents received adequate cares. Findings included: - The facility failed to complete annual performance reviews for the five certified Medication Aide and/or Certified Nurse Aides (CMA/CNA) sampled that were employed by the facility for 12 months or greater as follows: 1. CNA M, hired 6/7/23 2. CNA N hired 4/3/23 3. CNA P hired 1/11/23 4. CNA Q hired 7/21/22 5. CMA S hired 2/22/23 On 1/23/25 at 12:48 PM, Administrative Staff A, confirmed the above findings. She stated she had been employed as administrator of the facility for approximately six weeks and could not explain why the sampled staff lacked annual performance evaluations. Administrative Staff A reported she had reviewed the personnel files and checked with human resources and could not locate performance evaluations for the direct care staff noted above. She agreed staff should have annual evaluations which…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-01-23 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 47 residents. The facility identified residents on Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP-infection control interventions designed to reduce transmission of resistant organisms that employ targeted gown and glove use during high contact care). Based on record review, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the gait belts were sanitized after each resident's use and further failed to ensure staff followed the protocols when a nurse provided a tube feeding for a resident. These deficient practices placed the residents at risk for infectious diseases. Findings included: - R37's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) from the Diagnoses tab documented diagnoses of dysphagia, gastric ulcer, digestive system surgical aftercare, and gastritis. The Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] the staff assessment for mental status documented R37 had long and short-term memory problems and severely impaired cognition. R37 had loss of liquids/solids from mouth, held…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-23 · tag F0645 — isolated
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility reported a census of 47 residents with 14 residents sampled. Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that one Resident (R) 6 had a current and valid Preadmission Screening and Annual Resident Review (PASARR). Findings included: - Review of the Electronic Health Record (EHR) for R6 included diagnoses of schizoaffective disorder bipolar type (mental illness is a combination of symptoms of schizophrenia and symptoms of a mood disorder, anxiety (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty and irrational fear), and depressive disorder (a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest). The Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated 06/21/24, documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, which indicated intact cognition. The assessment documented R6 had the diagnoses of anxiety, depression, and schizophrenia. Received antipsychotic, antianxiety, hypnotic, anticoagulant, antibiotic, diuretic, and opioid, with indications noted. The 01/09/20 Care Plan reviewed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-23 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility had a census of 47 residents and the sample included 14 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a safe environment free from accident hazards for Resident (R) 25 who had a medication located in her room that was not secured. This failure placed the affected residents at risk for preventable accidents and related injuries. Findings included: - During the onsite survey, the surveyors identified a concern regarding the unsecured medications observed in one resident's room during interview. During an observation on 01/21/25 at 11:31 AM, R25 had a 16-ounce, spray wound cleaning medication on her over the bed table. The medication had a warning label Keep out of reach of children. During an observation on 01/22/25 at 11:07 AM, R25 had a 16-ounce, spray wound cleaning medication on her dresser. The medication had a warning label Keep out of reach of children. During an interview on 01/22/25 at 11:07 AM, R25's roommate R6 reported she was unsure why the spray bottle was there and that the staff must have forgotten it. During…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-23 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 47 residents, which included one resident sampled for respiratory care. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide appropriate respiratory care in maintaining respiratory equipment to prevent the spread of infection, for one Resident (R) 35. The facility failed to ensure safe storage of oxygen nasal cannula and oxygen tubing when not in use to prevent cross contamination and the spread of infection. Finding included: - Review of Resident (R)35's Physician Orders, dated 01/14/25, revealed diagnoses which included acute respiratory failure with hypoxia (inadequate supply of oxygen). The admission Minimum Data Set, (MDS) dated [DATE], documented the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 15, indicating intact cognition. R35 received oxygen. The Care Plan, (CP), dated 01/21/25, directed staff to know the resident received oxygen via nasal cannula. The CP lacked direction regarding the maintenance and upkeep of the resident's oxygen…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-23 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 47 residents. The sample included 13 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to provide adequate pharmaceutical services to ensure Resident (R) 25 had their prescribed medications available in a timely manner for administration. This deficient practice placed both R25 and R38 at risk of delayed treatment, which could have adverse consequences. Findings included: - R25's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) from the Diagnoses tab documented diagnoses of diabetes mellitus (DM - when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin is made, or the body cannot respond to the insulin), hyperlipidemia (condition of elevated blood lipid levels), and anemia (inadequate number of healthy red blood cells to carry adequate oxygen to body tissues). The Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 0, which indicated severely impaired cognition. R25's Care Plan dated 06/27/24 documented nursing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-15 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 44 residents with seven residents selected for review including two residents reviewed for allegations of abuse. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to report allegations of abuse to the State Survey Agency when an allegation was made by Resident (R)1 and R7 against Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) M on 10/26/23. R1 reported CNA M tried to get her out of bed forcefully, grabbed her by the arm and hurt her and R7 reported CNA M forced a long sleeve shirt on him when he wanted a short sleeve shirt on and CNA M treated R7 with verbal abuse by being rude. Findings included: - The Medical Diagnosis tab for Resident (R)1 included diagnoses of paraplegia (paralysis characterized by motor or sensory loss in the lower limbs and trunk), myopathy (muscle weakness due to a dysfunction in the muscle fibers), general anxiety disorder (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty and irrational fear), and major depressive disorder (major mood…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-01-23 · tag F0801 — widespread
    Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 42 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to employ a full time certified dietary manager for the 42 residents who resided in the facility and received meals from the facility kitchen. This deficient practice placed the 42 residents at risk for receiving inadequate nutrition. Findings included: - On 01/17/23 at 08:50 AM, observation in the facility kitchen revealed damage to the ceiling covered with plastic and no staff working in the kitchen. Dietary Staff (DS) BB stated the damage was from a water pipe on 12/25/22 and the kitchen was shut down for repairs starting today. He stated the facility was buying takeout from Casey's, Firehouse Subs, IHOP, Arbys, Jimmies Eggs, [NAME] Sims BBQ, China One, Louie's Café, Subway and Olive Garden. Further observation revealed the double refrigerator in the kitchen held a large opened, undated bag of hotdogs, one chunk of ham without a date. The walk-in freezer had an opened, undated bag of French fries.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-01-23 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — widespread
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 42 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure foods remained at a safe, hot, holding temperature during the meal service. This deficient practice placed the 42 residents who received meals from the facility at risk for food borne illness. Findings included: - On 01/19/23 at 07:57 AM, Dietary Staff (DS) CC obtained breakfast food temperatures from ready to eat food brought to the facility from an outside source. DS CC stated when they brought the food in, it probably cooled. Temperatures included: White gravy : 145 degrees Fahrenheit (F) bacon: 131degrees F sausage: 130 degrees F fried potatoes: 128 degrees F scrambled eggs: 130 degrees F The temperature log indicated temperatures should be 140-165 degrees F. On 01/19/23, further observation at 08:00 AM, staff discovered the steam table outlet was not working and changed to another electrical outlet. At 08:38 AM, food temperatures were: Eggs: 120 degrees F Bacon: 140 degrees F Potatoes:…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-01-23 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility had a census of 42 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to store, prepare, and serve food to the residents of the facility in a safe, sanitary manner. This deficient practice placed the 42 residents of the facility who received their meals form the kitchen at risk for food borne illnesses. Findings included: - On 01/17/23 at 08:50 AM, observation in the facility kitchen revealed damage to the ceiling covered with plastic and no staff working in the kitchen. Dietary Staff (DS) BB stated the damage was from a water pipe on 12/25/22 and the kitchen was shut down for repairs starting that day. Further observation revealed the double refrigerator in the kitchen held a large opened, undated bag of hotdogs, one chunk of ham without a date. The walk-in freezer had an opened, undated bag of French fries. The last date staff logged the temperature was 12/26/22. The refrigerator temperature in the dining room was 40 and the temperature log stopped at 12/6/22. On 01/17/23 at 08:50 AM, observation revealed a dishwasher in the facility…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 24 citations
  • Potential for harm · F2023-01-23 · tag F0882 — widespread
    Designate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility had a census of 42 residents. Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the staff person designated as the Infection Preventionist, who was responsible for the facility's Infection Prevention and Control Program, completed the specialized training in infection prevention and control. This placed the residents at risk for lack of identification and treatment of infections. Findings included: - On 01/19/23 at 01:20 PM, Administrative Nurse E stated she was responsible for the Infection Prevention and Control Program and lacked certification as an Infection Preventionist. Administrative Nurse E stated she had completed most of or all the training modules but had not taken the test or received the certification. The Surveillance for Infections policy, dated October 2021 documented the Infection Preventionist will conduct ongoing surveillance for Healthcare- Associated Infections (HAIs) and other epidemiologically significant infections that have substantial impact on potential resident outcome and that may require transmission -based precautions…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-01-23 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility had a census of 42 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure drugs were in locked storage when unattended by licensed staff. This deficient practice placed residents at risk for missing or tampered with medications. Findings included: - On 01/17/23 at 03:01 PM, observation revealed the facility's medication cart on the 100-hall unlocked and no nursing staff in sight. The drawers of medications were accessible. At 03:05 PM, Certified Medication Aide (CMA) S verified she had left the cart unlocked when she went to assist a resident in their room. On 01/19/23 at 04:10 PM, observation of the medication cart on the 100 hall revealed the cart unlocked and medication accessible with no licensed staff in sight of the cart. Administrative Staff A locked the cart as he went past. On 01/19/23 at 04:10 PM, Administrative Staff A verified staff were to lock the medication cart when leaving the area or when out of sight of the cart. The facility's Storage of Medications policy, dated 10/2021, documented drugs and biologicals are…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-01-23 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — pattern
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility had a census of 42 residents. The sample included 12 residents of which five were reviewed for immunization status. Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to offer and provide and/or obtain informed refusals for influenza and pneumococcal vaccinations and failed to offer and provide the residents and/or their representative the current years Vaccine Information Statement (VIS-information sheets produced by the CDC [Centers for Disease Control and Prevention] that explained both the benefits and risk of vaccine to vaccine recipients for Resident (R)5, R10, R17, R29 and R35. This placed the affected residents at increased risk for illness and infection. Findings included: - R5's clinical record lacked evidence the current year Vaccine Information Statement form was provided to the resident and/or resident's representative, or an informed refusal was obtained. R10's clinical record lacked evidence the current year Vaccine Information Statement form was provided to the resident and/or resident's representative or an informed refusal was obtained. R17's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-01-23 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 42 residents. The sample included 13 residents with five reviewed for activities of daily living (ADL). Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide dignity during dining for Resident (R) 28 who was brought to the dining room disheveled and then left unassisted while he dropped food all down the front of his shirt. This placed R28 at risk for impaired dignity and decreased psychosocial wellbeing. Findings included: - R28's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) recorded diagnoses of dementia (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion), history of cerebrovascular accident (CVA- stroke-sudden death of brain cells due to lack of oxygen caused by impaired blood flow to the brain by blockage or rupture of an artery to the brain) and depression (mood disorder characterized by persistent sadness). The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] recorded R28 had a Brief interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of four which…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-01-23 · tag F0582 — isolated
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility had a census of 42 residents. The sample included 12 residents. Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide three sampled residents, Resident (R)13, R16 and R146 (or their representative) the completed Skilled Nursing Facility Advanced Beneficiary Notices (ABN) form 10055, (CMS) Centers for Medicare and Medicare Services which placed them at risk to make uninformed decisions about their skilled care Findings included: - The Medicare ABN form 10055 informed the beneficiary that Medicare may not pay for future skilled therapy services. The form included an option for the beneficiary to receive specific services listed, and bill Medicare for an official decision on payment. The form stated 1) I understand if Medicare does not pay, I will be responsible for payment, but can make an appeal to Medicare, (2) receive therapy listed, but do not bill Medicare, I am responsible for payment for services, (3) I do not want the listed services. The facility provided R13 the completed form 10055, which estimated the cost for the services to be able to make an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-01-23 · tag F0625 — isolated
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 42 residents. The sample included 13 residents with one reviewed for hospitalization. Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to provide Resident (R) 19 with a bed hold notice upon discharge to the hospital. This placed the resident at risk for impaired rights to return to the facility and in the same room as previously resided. Findings included: - R19's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) recorded diagnoses of hypertension (HTN-high blood pressure), diabetes mellitus (when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin made or the body cannot respond to the insulin), and depression (mood disorder characterized by feelings of persistent sadness). The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] recorded R19 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 10 which indicated moderate cognitive impairment. R19 required extensive assistance of one staff for most activities of daily living (ADL). R19 used a wheelchair for mobility and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-01-23 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 42 residents. The sample included 13 residents with two reviewed for urinary catheter (a flexible tube used to empty the bladder and collect urine in a drainage bag) use. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to develop a baseline care plan in a timely manner for Resident 93's urinary catheter and R194's activities of daily living (ADL) , hospice and end of life cares. This deficient practice placed at risk for unmet and uncommunicated care needs. Findings included: - R93 was admitted to the facility 01/16/23, with a diagnosis of malignant neoplasm (cancer) of the lung. The Baseline Care Plan, dated 01/18/23, lacked catheter care information. The Physician Order, dated 01/17/23, directed staff to place an indwelling urinary catheter due to resident decline, change every 30 days and as needed (prn). The Progress Note, dated 01/17/23 at 06:19 PM, documented the nurse placed a 18 french, 30 milliliter (ml), indwelling catheter via sterile procedure and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-01-23 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 42 residents. The sample included 12 residents, with two reviewed for indwelling urinary catheters (tube inserted directly into the bladder to drain urine). Based on observations, interview and record review, the facility failed to develop a care plan for Resident (R) 15's indwelling catheter as well as need for assistance with activities of daily living. This placed R15 at risk for uncommunicated and unmet care needs. Findings included: - R15's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) recorded diagnoses of pain, heart failure, neuromuscular dysfunction (lack of bladder control due to brain, spinal cord or nerve problems) of bladder and urinary tract infection. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], recorded R15 had intact cognition, required extensive assistance of one staff for activities of daily living (ADL), had an indwelling urinary catheter and was always incontinent of bowel. The Urinary Incontinence/Indwelling Catheter Care Area Assessment (CAA), dated 11/28/22,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-01-23 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 42 residents. The sample included 12 residents, with five reviewed for unnecessary medications. Based on observations, interview and record review, the facility failed to revise the care plan to include Resident (R)38 and R32's antipsychotic (a medication used to treat any major mental disorder characterized by a gross impairment in reality testing medication which included targeted behavior and side effects) medication, and failed to revise R19s care plan with her change in mobility status. This placed the affected residents at risk for inadequate care or uncommunicated care needs. Findings included: - R38's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) recorded diagnoses of Alzheimer's disease (progressive mental deterioration characterized by confusion and memory failure.) R38's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], recorded R38 had Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of eight which indicated moderate cognition impairment. The MDS recorded R38 required limited assistance of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-01-23 · tag F0660 — isolated
    Plan the resident's discharge to meet the resident's goals and needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 42 residents. The sample included 13 residents with one reviewed for discharge. Based on interviews, and record review, the facility failed to establish a discharge plan with goals for Resident (R) 42. This placed R42 at risk for uncommunicated care needs and inappropriate discharge. Findings Included: - R42's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) recorded diagnoses of diabetes mellitus (when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin made or the body cannot respond to the insulin), anxiety (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty and irrational fear), right femur (thigh bone) fracture, and depression (mood disorder characterized by feelings of persistent sadness). R42's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] recorded R42had a Brief Interview for mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 which indicated he was cognitively intact. He required supervision with set up help for activities of daily living (ADL). The MDS recorded R42 was at risk for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-01-23 · tag F0661 — isolated
    Ensure necessary information is communicated to the resident, and receiving health care provider at the time of a planned discharge.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 42 residents. The sample included 13 residents with one reviewed for discharge. Based on interviews, and record review, the facility failed to complete a recapitulation of Resident (R) 42 stay at the facility. This placed R42 at risk for uncommunicated care needs and missed health care opportunities. Findings Included: - R42's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) recorded diagnoses of diabetes mellitus (when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin made or the body cannot respond to the insulin), anxiety (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty and irrational fear), and depression (mood disorder characterized by feelings of persistent sadness). R42's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] recorded R42had a Brief Interview for mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 which indicated he was cognitively intact. He required supervision with set up help for activities of daily living (ADL). The MDS recorded R42 was at risk for pressure injuries,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-01-23 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 42 residents. The sample included 13 residents with five reviewed for activities od daily living (ADL). Based on observation interview, and record review the facility failed to provide Resident (R) 28 with the requires personal hygiene and dressing assistance he required. The facility further failed to provide consistent bathing per resident preferences for R28, R35, and R38. This placed the affected residents at risk for impaired dignity increased risk for skin issues and other complications. Findings included: - R28's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) recorded diagnoses of dementia (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion), history of cerebrovascular accident (CVA, stroke-CVA) (stroke) - sudden death of brain cells due to lack of oxygen caused by impaired blood flow to the brain by blockage or rupture of an artery to the brain) and depression (mood disorder characterized by persistent sadness). The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE]…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-01-23 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 42 residents. The sample included 13 residents with five reviewed for activities of daily living (ADL). Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure appropriate wheelchair positioning for Resident (R) 19 whose feet dangled in an unsupported, dependent position while she sat in her wheelchair. This placed R19 at increased risk for medical complications and/or injuries. Findings included: - R19s' Electronic Medical Record (EMR) recorded diagnoses of hypertension (HTN-high blood pressure), diabetes mellitus (when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin made or the body cannot respond to the insulin), and depression (mood disorder characterized by feelings of persistent sadness). The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] recorded R19 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 10 which indicated moderate cognitive impairment. R19 required extensive assistance of one staff for most activities of daily living (ADL).…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-01-23 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 42 residents. The sample included 13 residents with seven reviewed for accidents and/or falls. Based on observation, record review, and interviews the facility failed to ensure interventions identified to prevent falls were implemented for Resident (R)35 and failed to identify and implement interventions to prevent further falls for R36. This placed the residents at risk for further falls and fall related injuries. Findings included: - R35's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) recorded diagnoses of renal insufficiency (kidney failure) diabetes mellitus (when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin made or the body cannot respond to the insulin), dementia (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion), hip fracture, anxiety (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty, and irrational fear) and depression (mood disorder characterized by persistent sadness). The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] recorded R35…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-01-23 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 42 residents. The sample included 13 residents with five reviewed for unnecessary medication. Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to act upon the recommendations of the Consultant Pharmacist (CP) to monitor and report abnormal findings when Resident (R) 19's blood glucose levels were outside acceptable parameters and failure to administer R19's as needed (PRN) insulin (medication used to lower blood glucose levels) for elevated blood glucose levels. This placed the affected residents at risk for medical complications related to the medication regimen. Findings included: - R19s' Electronic Medical Record (EMR) recorded diagnoses of hypertension (HTN-high blood pressure), diabetes mellitus (when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin made or the body cannot respond to the insulin), and depression (mood disorder characterized by feelings of persistent sadness). The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] recorded R19 had a Brief…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-01-23 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 42 residents. The sample included 13 residents with five reviewed for unnecessary medication. Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to monitor and report abnormal findings when Residnet (R) 19's blood glucose levels were outside ordered parameters and further failed to administer R19's as needed (PRN) insulin (medication used to lower blood glucose levels) for elevated blood glucose levels. The facility further failed to monitor bowel movements for R35 and R36. This placed the affected residents at risk for medical complications related to the medication regimen. Findings included: - R19s' Electronic Medical Record (EMR) recorded diagnoses of hypertension (HTN-high blood pressure), diabetes mellitus (when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin made or the body cannot respond to the insulin), and depression (mood disorder characterized by feelings of persistent sadness). The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] recorded R19…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-01-23 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 42 residents. The sample included 12 residents, with five reviewed for unnecessary medications. Based on observations, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure an appropriate indication for Resident (R)38's, and R32's antipsychotic (a medication used to treat any major mental disorder characterized by a gross impairment in reality testing)medication, failed to ensure a 14- day stop date for R17's received as needed (PRN) psychotropic (an antianxiety medication that calm and relax people with excessive restlessness) that lacked a 14 day stop date or rationale for use. This placed the affected residents at risk for unintended affects related to psychotropic drug medications. Findings include: - R38's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) recorded diagnoses of Alzheimer's disease (progressive mental deterioration characterized by confusion and memory failure.) R 38's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], recorded R38 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-01-23 · tag F0849 — isolated
    Arrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 42 residents. The sample included 12 residents with two reviewed for hospice. Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure collaboration with the hospice provider to establish a plan for Resident (R)194's care and included shared information regarding R194's care needs, medication and equipment provided by hospice as well as the frequency of nursing visits and nursing care provided by hospice. This placed R194 at risk for uncommunciated or unmet care needs related to end of life cares. Findings included : - R194's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) recorded diagnoses of respiratory failure and dementia (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory and confusion). The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented R194 had severe cognitive impairment, required limited to extensive assistance with activities of daily living (ADL), and had medically complex conditions. The MDS further documented R194 had condition or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-06-16 · tag F0551 — isolated
    Give the resident's representative the ability to exercise the resident's rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 41 residents. The sample contained 14 residents, with five residents reviewed for COVID-19 vaccinations. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow instruction by the legal representative, for refusal of the COVID 19 vaccination for one Resident (R) 5 of the five sampled residents. The facility administered R5 the COVID-19 vaccine and then failed to timely notify the resident's legal representative of the failure to follow the instructions provided. Findings included: - The signed Physician Order Sheet (POS), dated 06/01/21, documented R5's diagnoses included dementia (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion). An annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented the resident Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score was 4, indicating severe cognitive impairment. A signed POS, dated 01/20/21, permitted R5 to receive the COVID-19 vaccination if asymptomatic of infection. A document in R5's Electronic Medical Record…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-06-16 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 41 residents. The sample contained 14 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to review and revise the plan of cares for two of the sampled residents. This included, Resident (R)1 with failure to include appropriate interventions following falls to prevent further falls and for R1 and R2 who used wheelchairs without foot pedals, propelled by staff, and with their feet touching the floor. Findings included: - The signed Physician Order Sheet (POS), dated 06/01/21 documented R1's diagnoses included dementia (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion), and schizophrenia (psychotic disorder characterized by gross distortion of reality, disturbances of language and communication and fragmentation of thought). A significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented R1 had short and long term memory loss, used a wheelchair, and had two or more non-injury falls since the last assessment 13 days prior.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-06-16 · tag F0661 — isolated
    Ensure necessary information is communicated to the resident, and receiving health care provider at the time of a planned discharge.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 41, the 14 sampled residents included two sampled for discharge. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop a discharge summary that included a recapitulation of the residents stay, a final summary of the residents' status at the time of discharge, for one of the two residents, Resident (R) 39. Findings included: - Review of Resident (R)39's, Physician Orders, dated, 04/01/21 documented the resident admitted to the facility on [DATE], with the following diagnoses: traumatic brain injury, epileptic seizures (violent involuntary series of contractions of a group of muscles), and hemiplegia (paralysis of one side of the body.) The admission Minimum Data Set, (MDS) dated [DATE], revealed the resident was unable to complete the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS). R39 required total dependence with two plus person assistance with activities of daily living. R39 expected to remain in the facility. Per record review, the nurses note dated 04/14/21 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-06-16 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 41, the sample of 14 included six residents for review regarding Activities of Daily Living (ADL). Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide the necessary services to maintain adequate personal hygiene, related to bathing, for one of the six residents, Resident (R)8. Findings included: - The signed Physician Order Sheet (POS), dated 06/01/21, documented R8's diagnoses included a healing fracture of his right thigh. An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented R8's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score was 12, indicating moderate cognitive impairment. He required physical help of one staff for part of bathing. The (ADL)Functional/ Rehabilitation Potential Care Area Assessment (CAA), dated 04/15/21, documented R8 had no dementia diagnosis, and required supervision to limited assistance with his activities of daily living (ADL) functioning. R8's ADL care plan, dated 05/12/21, instructed staff to offer him a shower…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-06-16 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 41 residents. The sample contained 14 residents, with three residents reviewed for accidents. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure safety for two of the three sampled residents including, failure to implement planned interventions to prevent further falls for Resident (R)1, and failure to use wheelchair foot pedals when propelling chairs for two cognitively impaired residents, R1 and R5, placing them at risk for falls/accidents. Findings included: - The signed Physician Order Sheet (POS), dated 06/01/21 documented R1's diagnoses included dementia (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion), and schizophrenia (psychotic disorder characterized by gross distortion of reality, disturbances of language and communication and fragmentation of thought). A significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented R1 had short and long term memory loss, used a wheelchair, and had two or more non-injury…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-06-16 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility reported a census of 41 residents, with 14 sampled for review which included five residents reviewed for unnecessary medication monitoring. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to adequately monitor one of the five residents reviewed, Resident (R)30's orders for notification to the physician when the resident's blood sugar was out of the ordered parameters. Finding included: - The Order Summary Report, dated 06/01/21 included a diagnosis of diabetes mellitus (when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin made or the body cannot respond to the insulin). A physician order with a start date of 01/08/21, instructed staff to complete a fasting accucheck daily and notify the physician if the resident's blood glucose was less than 50 or greater than 300. The Licensed Nurse Medication Administration Record (MAR) dated 04/01/21 though 04/30/21, revealed R30 had blood sugar levels out of parameters on three different occasions. On 04/24/21 his blood sugar was 346, on 04/25/21 his blood sugar was 317, and on 04/26/21 his blood sugar was 358.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$30,566 in federal fines across 1 penalty. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

  • $30,566 — penalty dated 2023-11-15
  • Medicare payment denial — starting 2023-12-12 for 10 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to ADVENA LIVING COMMUNITIES — 6 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 3 of 51.3+1.7 vs chain
Health inspection 3 of 51.5+1.5 vs chain
Staffing 3 of 52.0+1.0 vs chain
Quality measures 2 of 51.7+0.3 vs chain
The other 5 homes this chain runs (chain average 1.3★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
KS HOST PORTFOLIO OPCO LLCOrganizationDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 11/01/2019
CGHII INCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 11/01/2019
CORNERSTONE GROUP HOLDINGS INCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 11/01/2019
MGMG HOLDINGS LLCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 11/01/2019
GENUTH, MIKEIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 11/01/2019
GREENFIELD, MICHAELIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 11/01/2019
NOVOTNY, MICHELLEIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 11/01/2019
NOVOTNY, WILLIAMIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 11/01/2019
NEW PARADIGM SOLUTIONS INCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/07/2025
MCCUE, TAMARAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/01/2024
RITCHEY, OLGAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/09/2024
CORNERSTONE EMPLOYMENT SOLUTIONS INCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 11/01/2019

CMS files one row per role, so the 17 rows in the source record cover these 12 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

6 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$4.7M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+3.4%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$511K
Related-party expense11% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 61%Medicare 7%Other / private 31%

This home reported $511K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 11% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$239per resident / day
operating cost
$7,251per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$247per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in KS

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Kansas Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Kansas
$8,669/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$9,064/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,975/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 175221. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-01-23, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next