Clearwater Nursing & Rehabilitation Center
620 E Wood Street, Clearwater, KS 67026 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 55 certified beds · (620) 584-2271 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- CMS lists it as a Special Focus candidate — not on the watch list itself, but among the homes CMS is watching because of its recent inspection history
- CMS has flagged it for abuse
- it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0609, F0610) — most recent Sep 2025
- inspectors cited 5 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
- inspectors recorded 2 serious findings as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (63) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $225,379 in federal fines (most recent 2026-06-03)
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
- its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)
- nursing-staff turnover (70%) runs well above the national median (45%)
- about 23% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 1 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 2 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 2 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 2 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 24.2% | 17.9% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 0.0% | 4.9% | 5.4% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 1.6% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 2.1% | 2.9% | 2.0% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 0.0% | 6.5% | 6.5% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 2.6% | 4.3% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 19.0% | 16.2% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 25.9% | 23.2% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 95.5% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 0.8% | 4.4% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 22.0% | 22.6% | 21.2% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 33.0% | 18.1% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 5.1% | 1.9% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 70.4% | 73.8% | 79.4% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.98 | 1.80 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 2.10 | 2.13 | 1.80 | worse |
* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
Met the expected recovery: 40.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 27 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.24 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 31% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 7% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 11.2%CMS range 7.0–16.1 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 40.7% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 25.9% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 37.0% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 93.3% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 3.3% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 3.3% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.76 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 55 beds and averages 42.2 residents a day — about 77% occupied, or roughly 13 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.31 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.37 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.34 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.83 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.50 on weekdays — 19% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.40 to 0.30 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 70% is well above the national median of 45%. 3 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
63 citations, most serious first. The 19 most serious are shown; the remaining 44 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2026-06-03 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision to prevent an elopement for cognitively impaired Resident (R)14, who the facility identified as at high risk for wandering. On 05/15/2026 at approximately 11:35 AM, R14 exited the unsecured smoking area in the facility parking lot after Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) M turned to assist another resident. At approximately 01:43 PM, Dietary Staff BB went to R14's room to pick up his lunch tray and identified that the resident was not in his room and had not eaten lunch. Dietary Staff BB notified other staff, and they began searching for R14 at 01:45 PM. At approximately 02:04 PM, staff located R14 approximately 0.8 miles from the facility and returned him to the facility without injuries. The weather outside at that time ranged from 82 degrees to 88 degrees Fahrenheit (F). While R14's actual route was unknown, the resident would have crossed multiple busy [NAME] streets and railroad tracks to reach his destination.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-09-17 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 47 residents. The sample included 10 residents, with six residents reviewed for abuse. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents remained free from physical and sexual abuse. On 05/12/25 Resident (R) 1 admitted to the facility with a history of inappropriate behaviors. On 05/14/25, R1 grabbed and hit cognitively impaired R2 and staff placed R1 on one-to-one until he discharged to a behavioral health hospital on [DATE]. R1 returned to the facility on [DATE], and the facility did not implement interventions for R1 to prevent further resident abuse. On 06/01/25, R1 bit R2's finger, causing it to bleed. R1 went to a behavioral health unit on 06/05/25 and returned to the facility on [DATE]. On 06/21/25, R1 and R2 had an altercation where they slapped each other, and R1 grabbed R2's arm. On 06/28/25, R1 placed his hand on cognitively impaired R3's clothed genital area. The facility did not complete an investigation into the event or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-01-14 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 39 residents. The sample included three residents who required transportation in the facility van. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R) 1 remain free from accidents when Certified Medication Aide (CMA) R did not utilize the safety belt for R1 before transporting in the facility van. On 12/11/24 at approximately 03:00 PM, Certified Medication Aide R failed to secure dependent R1 in her wheelchair with the wheelchair safety belt in the facility van, prior to transporting. CMA R entered a busy highway with a speed limit of 60 miles per hour (MPH) and had to slam on the brakes to avoid an accident, which caused the resident to slide forward out of her wheelchair onto the floor of the van due to the lack of the seatbelt use. R1 sustained multiple injuries including skin tears and a laceration. Findings include: - R1's undated Physician Order Sheet (POS) documented the resident admitted on [DATE] with the following diagnoses:…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Lcited before2024-06-03 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — widespreadProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 43 residents with 15 residents sampled, which included two residents reviewed for behaviors and resident-to-resident abuse. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff identified and responded appropriately to all allegations of abuse, to include resident-to-resident abuse, when Resident (R)22, who had a history of hitting other residents, continued to hit residents in the facility on multiple occasions. On 12/20/22, R22 grabbed R195's sweatshirt by the collar and pushed her wheelchair backwards. R22 let go and then grabbed her nose between his index and middle finger. He continued to pull on her nose, which according to R195, caused pain. On 01/01/23, R22 hit R 196. On 02/06/23, R22, with a closed fist, hit R196 to the back of the head. On 06/04/23, R22 hit his spouse and then hit R30 which knocked R30 out of his chair. On 06/11/23, R22 swung a baby doll, and hit R13 twice on the face across her glasses. On 05/12/24, R22 punched R17…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Lcited before2024-06-03 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — widespreadTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 43 residents with 15 residents reviewed for abuse. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the timely reporting of alleged abuse to the State Agency (SA - a state governmental agency that provides oversight for the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services [CMS - the federal government agency that administers the nation's major healthcare programs]) or local law enforcement, as required. The facility failed to report two allegations of resident-to-resident abuse, when on 05/12/24 at 04:45 PM, R22, who had a history of hitting others, punched R17 on the left side of R17's jaw. On 05/20/24, R22 raised his closed fist to R2 and made contact with R2's face. Both notes from the electronic records revealed the staff notified management, however niether of the instances were reported to the state agency, as required. These continued incidents of resident-to-resident abuse and lack of supervision and interventions to prevent abuse, and falls…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Lcited before2024-06-03 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — widespreadRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 43 residents with 15 residents sampled, which included two residents reviewed for abuse. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to investigate all allegations of resident-to-resident abuse to protect residents from further incidents of abuse. The facility failed to thoroughly investigate two abuse allegations regarding R22, who had a history of hitting other residents, and continued to hit residents in the facility on multiple occasions. On 12/20/22, R22 grabbed R195's sweatshirt by the collar and pushed her wheelchair backwards. R22 let go and then grabbed her nose between his index and middle finger. He continued to pull on her nose, which caused R195 pain. On 01/01/23, R22 hit R196. On 02/06/23, R22, with a closed fist, hit R196 to the back of the head. On 06/04/23, R22 hit his spouse and then hit R30 which knocked R30 out of his chair. On 06/11/23, R22 swung a baby doll, and hit R13 twice on the face across her glasses. On 05/12/24, R22…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2024-06-03 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 43 residents, with 15 included in the sample. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure an environment as free from accident hazards as possible when the hot water in four resident rooms and a beauty shop measured at hazardous levels ranging between 138 and 157 degrees Fahrenheit (F). This failure affected six residents (Resident (R) 3, R15, R19, R22, R29, and R30) two of which were cognitively impaired and independently mobile, and any resident who received services in the beauty shop rinse sink. This failure placed the residents in immediate jeopardy to their health and safety and at risk for burns and injury related to hot water exposure. Furthermore, the facility failed to thoroughly document and place effective interventions for each of R24's 12 documented falls since 03/26/24 (approximately 2 months). The facility also failed to conduct thorough fall investigations and provide adequate supervision and effective fall interventions to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-06-03 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility census totaled 43 with 15 in the sample and two residents reviewed for pressure injuries. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to place interventions to prevent pressure injuries (localized injury to the skin and/or underlying tissue usually over a bony prominence, as a result of pressure, or pressure in combination with shear and/or friction) for Resident (R) 30, and R3 who developed preventable, facility acquired, stage 3 (full thickness pressure injury extending through the skin into the tissue below) pressure injuries at the facility, and for R26, related to stage 3 pressure injury. The facility further failed to place interventions on the resident's care plans to prevent worsening of the wounds. Findings included: - Review of R30's Electronic Health Record (EHR) revealed the resident had the following diagnoses: displaced intertrochanteric fracture of left femur (broken left hip), type 2 diabetes mellitus without complications (DM-when the body cannot use…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2022-11-08 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility reported a census of 44 residents, with 12 sampled, and one resident reviewed for nutrition. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to re-weigh or begin nutritional supplements as recommended by the registered dietician (RD), to prevent further weight loss for Resident (R)16. From 09/02/22 (156.8 lbs.) to 11/01/22 (141.2 lbs.) R16 lost 9.95% of her weight. Findings included: - The Electronic Health Record (EHR) documented R16's diagnoses included dementia (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion), and Alzheimer's (progressive mental deterioration characterized by confusion and memory failure). The 10/18/21 admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), documented a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) of 0, indicating severely impaired cognition. R16 required limited assistance of one staff with eating and identified areas of concern with chewing/swallowing. R16's height was 67 inches with a weight of 167 pounds (lbs.). The 10/18/21 Nutritional Status Care Area Assessment (CAA), documented R16 was on a mechanical…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-06-03 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespreadHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to use the services of a Registered Nurse (RN) for at least eight consecutive hours a day, seven days a week. Findings included:- Review of the Registered Nursing Staffing Schedule for March 2026, April 2026, and May 2026 revealed the facility lacked a Registered Nurse on the following dates:03/16/26,03/21/26 and 03/22/26.04/04/26 and 04/18/26.05/02/26, 05/03/26, 05/16/26, 05/23/26, 05/24/26 and 05/31/26. On 06/03/26 at 09:00 AM, Administrative Nurse D verified the facility did not have a Registered Nurse in the building for eight consecutive hours or working as a charge nurse for the above documented dates. The facility's Registered Nurse policy, dated January 2024, documented the facility would employ the services of an RN for at least eight consecutive hours a day, seven days a week. The facility would designate an RN to serve as the Director of Nursing (DON) on a full-time basis. The policy documented the DON may serve as a charge nurse only when the facility has an average daily census of 60 or fewer residents. The RN…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2026-06-03 · tag F0730 — widespreadObserve each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide regular in-service education based on the outcome of performance reviews and failed to ensure all nurse aides received the required number of in-service training hours per year. This placed the residents at risk of impaired care. Findings Include:- The facility's employment records documented eleven nurse aides were employed at the facility for at least one year. The facility's in-service records documented that 5 of those nurses' aides reviewed had not completed the required 12 hours of in-service training in the past year.Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) N, hired 01/29/2024, lacked the required number of in-service hours and in-services based on performance evaluations. CNA O, hired 05/29/2025, lacked the required number of in-service hours and in-services based on performance evaluations.CNA P, hired 05/22/2025, lacked the required number of in-service hours and in-services based on performance evaluations.CNA Q, hired 02/24/2025, lacked the required number of in-service hours and in-services based on performance…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2026-06-03 · tag F0801 — widespreadEmploy sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to employ a full-time certified dietary manager for the 32 residents who resided in the facility and received meals from the facility kitchen. Findings included:- On 06/02/2026, a review of the noon meal consisted of pork loin, oven-roasted potatoes, carrots, and Jello parfait.On 06/02/2026 at 11:00 AM, observation revealed Dietary CC in the kitchen overseeing the preparation of the noon meal.On 06/01/2026 at 08:00 AM, Dietary CC stated he was not a Certified Dietary Manager (CDM) and had not been enrolled in any dietary certification classes.On 06/03/26 at 09:00 AM, Administrative Nurse D verified he was not certified and planned to enroll him in classes at the end of June.The facility's Food and Nutrition Services policy, dated 10/2021, documented the Food Services manager would be CDM certified or enrolled in an accredited CDM program and on pace for completion.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-06-03 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food by professional standards for food service safety, and failed to consistently document food temperatures, refrigerator and freezer temperatures, and the dish machine PPM (Parts Per Million-a unit of measure used to indicate the concentration of a chemical sanitizer in the wash or rinse water) sanitizer log. Findings included:- On 06/01/2026 at 08:00 AM, during the initial kitchen tour, the stove had dried food and a greasy substance down the side and front, and inside the oven door, layers of black, stuck-on crusty food substances. The burners on the stove had blackened food particles. The shelf with the pots and pans had dried food particles throughout the shelf. The walk-in freezer had several unbagged tater tot potatoes and other unknown food items on the floor. The microwave in the dining room was dirty on the inside, with dried orange colored substance stuck on the top and food particles on the bottom and sides. Under two of the sinks, a hand sink and a food…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-06-03 · tag F0809 — failed to serve meals on a reasonable schedule — patternEnsure meals and snacks are served at times in accordance with resident’s needs, preferences, and requests. Suitable and nourishing alternative meals and snacks must be provided for residents who want to eat at non-traditional times or outside of scheduled meal times.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to consistently provide a nourishing evening snack to the 33 residents, who resided in the facility, 11 of whom have diabetes mellitus (DM- when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin is made, or the body cannot respond to the insulin). Findings included:- On 06/02/2026 at 11:00 AM, during the resident council meeting, Resident (R) 18 and R22, stated they were diabetic and did not always have snacks available at night. They stated that they used to have them at the nurse's station, but some residents were taking too many, and others would not receive one. Both residents stated there were no sandwiches available if they wanted one, just apples, bananas, fig bars, and cheese crackers.On 06/02/2026 at 1130 AM, Dietary CC stated that he was working on a better selection of snacks for the residents during the evening. Dietary CC stated that right now, he had Jell-O, pudding, and Cheetos that residents could have. He wanted to get a cabinet that they could lock up snacks that only staff could hand out. Dietary CC further…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-06-03 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — patternHave a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure their (QAA) Quality Assessment and Assurance Committee adequately identified deficient areas of practice and develop and implement appropriate plans of action to correct the deficient practices for the 68 residents residing in the facility. Findings included:- Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to post the results of the most recent survey in a place readily accessible to residents, family members, and legal representatives of residents. Refer to F577. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide a resident with written information regarding the facility's bed hold policy when they were transferred to the hospital. Refer to 628. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan with instructions to staff on providing surgical wound cares for a resident. Refer to 656. Based on observation and record…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-03 · tag F0628 — isolatedProvide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide Resident (R) 22, with written information regarding the facility's bed hold policy when they were transferred to the hospital. Findings included: - The Electronic Medical Record (EMR) for R22 documented diagnoses of diabetes mellitus (DM - when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin is made, or the body cannot respond to the insulin,) cerebral infarction (stroke - sudden death of brain cells due to lack of oxygen caused by impaired blood flow to the brain by blockage or rupture of an artery to the brain,) chronic respiratory failure (a long-term condition where the respiratory system struggles to adequately exchange oxygen and carbon dioxide, leading to dangerous low oxygen or high carbon dioxide levels in the blood,) hypoxemia (abnormal deficiency in the concentration of oxygen in arterial blood,) and syncope (fainting or passing out). R22's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented R22 had a Brief…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-03 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan with instructions to staff on providing surgical wound cares for Resident (R) 46. Findings included:- R34's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented he had a diagnosis of mastoiditis (serious bacterial infection of the skull just behind and below the ear). R34's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented R34 as a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) of 15, which indicated intact cognition. The MDS documented R34 required supervision with most activities of daily living (ADLs). The MDS documented that the resident had surgical wounds and received surgical wound care. The Care Area Assessment, CAA, dated 05/04/26, documented Resident triggered for potential skin breakdown d/t supervision needed to maintain ADL function. Surgical wound care and had a diagnosis of osteomyelitis (local or generalized infection of the bone and bone marrow)R34's Care Plan, revised 05/20/26, acknowledged…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-03 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to apply the standards of practice when staff intentionally documented that they had provided treatments to Resident (R) 39, though they had not actually provided the treatments. Findings included:- R39's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented diagnoses of edema, heart failure (a condition with low heart output and the body becomes congested with fluid), and urinary retention (lack of ability to urinate and empty the bladder). The Quarterly MDS, dated 03/19/2026, documented R39 had intact cognition. R39 was independent in toileting, personal hygiene, and mobility. The MDS further documented R39 had lower functional impairment on both sides, required supervision with transfers, and received diuretic medication daily. R39's 04/14/2026 Care Plan included the following interventions for R39: 10/23/2025- Inspect R39's skin daily with cares, administer medications as ordered, monitor and report any pertinent laboratory results to the physician, monitor vital signs as ordered, and notify the physician of any…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-03 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to apply the standards of practice as related to dependent edema when staff failed to wrap Resident (R) 39's legs to decrease the edema (swelling resulting from an excessive accumulation of fluid in the body tissue) in his legs as ordered. Findings included:- R39's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented diagnoses of edema, heart failure (a condition with low heart output and the body becomes congested with fluid), and urinary retention (lack of ability to urinate and empty the bladder).R39's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented R39 had intact cognition. R39 was independent with toileting hygiene, personal hygiene, transfers, and mobility. The MDS further documented R39 had lower functional impairment on both sides and received diuretic (a medication to promote the formation and excretion of urine) medication daily.The Quarterly MDS, dated 03/19/2026, documented R39 had intact cognition. R39 was independent in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 44 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-03 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide infection control practices for Resident (R)16, when staff left her nebulizer mouthpiece (a device that changes liquid medication into a mist easily inhaled into the lungs) on the bed and left her BIPAP (-Bilevel Positive Airway Pressure is a noninvasive ventilation device that helps patients breathe by delivering two levels of air pressure: higher during inhalation and lower during exhalation) tubing, that was unattached from the oxygen concentrator (medical device that separates nitrogen from the air around you so you can breathe up to 95% pure oxygen), directly on the floor. Findings included:- R16's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented diagnoses of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD-a progressive and irreversible condition characterized by diminished lung capacity and difficulty or discomfort in breathing) and pleural effusion (abnormal accumulation of fluid in the lungs).The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS),…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-03 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolatedEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure staff possessed the skills and competencies required when Licensed Nurse (LN) G failed to prime a Humalog (rapid-acting hormone that lowers the level of glucose in your blood) Kwik Pen (a pre-filled, disposable insulin injection device). prior to administration to Resident (R)19. Findings included:- On 06/02/2026 at 10:13 AM, R19 ambulated in the hall with a walker. LN G asked R19 if she was ready to receive her insulin, and R19 replied yes and entered her room. LN G followed her in with a plastic container that held a Humalog, 100 UNIT/milliliter (ml) [NAME] Pen, LN G clicked up seven units of insulin in the pen, then, without priming the pen (a procedure which removes the air from the needle and cartridge that may collect during normal use, ensuring that the pen is working correctly), administered the insulin in R19's left arm. LN G verified she had not primed the insulin and stated she was unaware she was supposed to. Upon…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-03 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to label Resident (R)6 insulin (a hormone that lowers the level of glucose in the blood) flex pens when initially opened for use and when expired and failed to discard R43's insulin flex pen that had expired. This deficient practice placed the affected residents at risk for ineffective medications. Findings included:- On [DATE] at 08:30 AM, observation of the facility's treatment cart revealed the following:R6's Humalog (fast-acting insulin) FlexPen was not labeled with an open date or an expired date.R43's Lantus (long-acting insulin) flex pen was labeled with an opened date of [DATE] and an expired date of [DATE]. On [DATE] at 08:15 AM, Administrative Nurse D verified the nurses should label and date the insulin flex pens with the date opened and discard the expired insulin flex pens. Medlineplus.gov directs open, unrefrigerated Humalog and Lantus can be used within 28 days; after that time, they must be discarded. The facility's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-03 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a sanitary and comfortable environment to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections when staff failed to change gloves and wash hands during incontinence care for Resident (R) 42. Staff also failed to store R12's breathing treatment mask and tubing in a sanitary manner. Findings included:1. On 06/01/26 at 10:00 AM, observation revealed R42 rested in bed on his back. Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) N and CNA O donned a gown and applied gloves and entered R42's room. R42 reported to the CNAs that he needed incontinence care due to having a bowel movement. CNA O gathered supplies, while CNA N pulled down the resident's pants and instructed him to turn onto his left side. Further observation revealed CNA N pulled down the brief in the back to reveal a moderate amount of stool covering the backside and his wound dressing area. CNA N removed the brief and dressing and provided peri-care to R42's buttock area, then instructed R42 to turn on his back. Further observation…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-23 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 40 residents. The sample of seven residents included three residents reviewed for social/medically related social services. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide care in a respectful and dignified manner for a dependent, cognitively impaired Resident (R)7 when staff shaved his beard off. Findings included:- R7's Electronic Health Record (EHR) documented diagnoses which included dementia (a progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory and confusion) with psychotic (characterized by a gross impairment in reality and/or perception) disturbances, and failure to thrive. The 02/27/26 Entry Minimum Data Set (MDS) documented R7 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R7's Discharge Return Anticipated MDS, dated 03/01/26, documented the resident was transferred to the hospital on [DATE]. R7's Baseline Care Plan, initiated on 02/27/28 and updated 02/28/26, informed staff that the resident had poor communication and comprehension. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-23 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — isolatedProvide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 40 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide supervision, treatment, services, and physical well-being for Resident (R) 2, who had dementia (a progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory and confusion) with intrusive wandering behaviors by going into R6, R4, R3, and R5's rooms uninvited. Findings included:R2's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented diagnoses of dementia, hypertension (high blood pressure), and unspecified protein-calorie malnutrition. R2's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented that R2 had severe cognitive impairment, physical behavioral symptoms directed toward others, which occurred one to three days of the look back period, and wandered four to six days of the look back period. R2 used a wheelchair for mobility, was dependent with toileting, showering, and putting on and taking off footwear, required substantial/maximal assistance with upper and lower body dressing, lying…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-23 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility had a census of 40 residents. The sample included three residents reviewed for medications. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to prevent significant medication errors for Resident (R) 1 who did not receive medications as ordered Additionally, the facility failed to notify the physician of the error. Findings included:- R1's Electronic Medical Records (EMR), documented diagnoses which included wound infection, osteomyelitis (local or generalized infection of the bone and bone marrow), diabetes mellitus (DM-when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin is made, or the body cannot respond to the insulin), renal failure (inability of the kidneys to excrete wastes, concentrate urine, and conserve electrolytes), and congestive heart failure (CHF-a condition with low heart output and the body becomes congested with fluid). R1's 02/24/26 Medicare -5 Day Minimum Data Set (MDS) documented R1 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 15, indicating intact cognition. R1 had an infection of the foot and a diabetic ulcer. R1 took…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-09-17 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 47 residents; the sample included 10 residents with three residents sampled for accommodation of preferences. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure staff acknowledged and implemented Resident (R)6's preferences related to receiving his medications after his meals. Findings included:- R6's undated Physician Orders, in the Electronic Health Record (EHR) included diagnoses of diabetes mellitus (DM-when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin is made, or the body cannot respond to the insulin) with hyperglycemia (elevated blood sugar content in the blood), long term use of insulin (hormone replacement medication that regulates blood sugar), cerebral infarction (stroke - sudden death of brain cells due to lack of oxygen caused by impaired blood flow to the brain by blockage or rupture of an artery to the brain), chest pain, hypertension (high blood pressure), myocardial infarction (heart attack), atrial fibrillation (irregular heart…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-17 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility reported a census of 47 residents. The sample included 10 residents, with six residents reviewed for abuse. Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed submit a completed investigation for allegations of resident-to-resident abuse to the State Agency within five working days as required for allegations involving Resident (R) 1 and R2 on 06/21/25 and R1 and R3 on 06/28/25.Findings Included:- The facility provided an initial report to the SA for a resident-to-resident involving R1 and R2 in Incident KS00196132 and for R1 and R3 in Incident KS00196270.R1's Progress Note on 06/21/25 at 03:08 AM documented staff witnessed R1 in the dining room with a female resident [R2]. The noted recorded staff witnessed both residents slapping each other on the arms, R1 grabbed the female resident's arm, and staff immediately intervened and separated the residents.R1's Progress Note on 06/28/25 at 11:03 AM, documented staff notified R1's representative that staff observed R1 touching a female resident in the genital area and R1 would be monitored on a one-to-one basis. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-17 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility reported a census of 47 residents. The sample included 10 residents, with six residents reviewed for abuse. Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to thoroughly investigate allegations of abuse for allegations involving Resident (R) 1 and R2 on 06/21/25 and R1 and R3 on 06/28/25.Findings Included:- The facility provided an initial report to the SA for a resident-to-resident involving R1 and R2 in Incident KS00196132 and for R1 and R3 in Incident KS00196270.R1's Progress Note on 06/21/25 at 03:08 AM documented staff witnessed R1 in the dining room with a female resident [R2]. The noted recorded staff witnessed both residents slapping each other on the arms, R1 grabbed the female resident's arm, and staff immediately intervened and separated the residents.The facility could not provide an investigation related to the 06/21/25 incident.R1's Progress Note on 06/28/25 at 11:03 AM, documented staff notified R1's representative that staff observed R1 touching a female resident in the genital area and R1 would be monitored on a one-to-one basis. The note…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-06-03 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — widespreadHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility reported a census of 43 residents. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain a clean, comfortable and homelike environment throughout the facility for all residents of the facility, regarding four Residents (R)7, R 26, R 35 and R 145, who had no means to control the temperature of their rooms. Findings included: - During an environmental tour on 05/28/24 at 12:56 PM, four Residents (R)7, R26, R35 and R145, rooms were noted to have blankets laying over their vents. Additionally, the door to R145's room was being held open with a gait belt (a wide belt, usually made from canvas threads or rigid plastic, used to help transfer or stabilize a resident during activity) that was tied to the doorknob and to a handle on a dresser drawer. On 05/28/24 at 12:56 PM, Resident (R)26 stated he had to cover the vent to his room because he was unable to control the temperature of his room. A resident in a neighboring room had the thermostat in their room and it was too warm for R 26. On 05/29/24 at 08:30 AM, an observation of R135's room revealed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-06-03 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespreadProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility reported a census of 43 residents. Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure adequate staffing to meet the needs of the residents of the facility. In 2023 the facility lacked 8-hour Registered Nurse (RN) coverage for 29 days, as reported by the facility. In 2023 the facility lacked 24-hour Licensed Nurse (LN) coverage for 127 days, about 35% of the year. This deficient practice affected all residents in the facility. (See the citations found on current recertification survey to include 4 IJ, harm, and subsequent Substandard Quality of Care.) Finding included: - During the annual survey, which began on 05/28/24, several residents reported issues involving lack of staff (Res ID and time of interview withheld for anonymity): 1. Staff do not respond to call lights promptly and said regularly they are not answered for over 45 minutes. 2. Staff do not answer call lights for 20-30 minutes on any shift and stated weekend staffing was slower. 3. Staff can be slow to respond and said they waited for 45 minutes for staff assistance with toileting. Review…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-06-03 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespreadHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility reported a census of 43 residents. Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to ensure 8-hour Registered Nurse coverage each day, as required, in order to meet the needs of the residents. This failure had the potential to negatively affect all residents in the facility and placed them at risk for decreased quality of life, treatment, and care. Finding included: - During the annual survey, which began on 05/28/24, several residents reported issues involving lack of staff. Review of the 2023 facility reported PBJ data revealed the following infraction dates representing dates the facility reported lack of required 8-hour Registered Nurse coverage in the facility: January: 3 days (16, 23, 29). February: 5 days (1, 5, 9, 25, 26). March: 3 days (4, 18, 25). April 2023: 6 days (2, 8, 15, 16, 29, 30). May 2023: 5 days (6, 7, 13, 14, 27). July 2023: 1 days (2). August 2023: 2 days (20, 27). November 2023: 4 days (16, 17, 23, 24). Of the 2023 8-hour RN infraction dates revealed: 2 on Monday, 1 on Wednesday, 12 on Saturday, and 13 on Sunday. Lack of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-06-03 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — widespreadEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility reported a census of 43 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to serve the residents of the facility food, which was palatable, attractive, and served at the appropriate temperature. Findings included: - During an interview with Resident (R) 26 on 05/28/24 at 12:50 PM, the resident stated when staff delivered his meals to his room, the food was always cold. On 05/30/24 at 01:07 PM, the survey team requested a sample meal tray and Dietary Staff O delivered the meal tray. The vegetables on the meal tray were measured by Dietary Staff O and measured 122 degrees Fahrenheit (F), which was below the required serving temperature of 135 degrees F. On 05/30/24 at 01:07 PM, the survey team tasted the meal tray for palatability and determined that the vegetables were not palatable. Dietary Staff O also tasted and confirmed the vegetables were not palatable due to temperature and should be served at the appropriate temperature. The facility lacked a policy for palatable foods. The facility failed to serve the residents of the facility…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-06-03 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility reported a census of 43 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to prepare and serve food under sanitary conditions, to the residents of the facility appropriately to prevent the potential for food borne illness. This deficient practice had the potential to negatively affect all the residents of the facility. Findings included: - During an initial tour of the kitchen on 05/28/24 at 08:20 AM, with Dietary Staff O, the following areas of concern were noted: 1. The main kitchen refrigerator contained three large, opened containers of sour cream which all lacked an open date. 2. The main kitchen refrigerator contained a small package of spoiled lettuce, wrapped in plastic wrap, with a date of 05/14/24. 3. The main kitchen refrigerator contained two large, opened containers of salad dressings which lacked an open date. 4. The main kitchen refrigerator contained a large container of cheese-pimento salad which lacked an open date. 5. The main kitchen refrigerator contained a small plastic bag with an unknown meat product which lacked…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-06-03 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — widespreadDispose of garbage and refuse properly.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
The facility reported a census of 43 residents. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to properly dispose of garbage and refuse by not ensuring the dumpster lid was always closed. Findings included: - On 05/28/24 at 08:20 AM, observation revealed the lid to the dumpster, used for garbage and refuse, contained a cover that sat in the open position on the back of the dumpster. On 05/28/24 at 08:20 AM, Dietary staff O stated she was unaware the dumpsters were part of the kitchen staff's responsibilities to ensure that they remained closed. On 06/06/24 at 01:50 PM, Administrative Nurse B stated that the expectation was for the lid on the dumpster to be in the closed position at all times and stated that she was aware of the regulatory requirement. The facility lacked a policy for ensuring the dumpsters lid was closed at all times. The facility failed to properly dispose of garbage and refuse by not ensuring the dumpster lid was closed at all times.
- Potential for harm · F2024-06-03 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — widespreadAdminister the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility identified a census of 43 residents. Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews the facility failed to put in place an effective administration who ensured the facility was administered in a manner that enabled it to use its resources effectively and efficiently to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident who resided at the facility. This deficient practice placed the residents at risk for decreased quality of care, quality of treatment, and sense of well-being. Findings included: - The facility failed to ensure an effective quality assessment and performance improvement (QAPI) program as evidenced by the number of deficient practices, elevated scope and severity, and substandard quality of care found onsite as followed. The facility failed to treat each resident with dignity, respect, and in a manner and environment that promoted the enhancement of resident's quality of life when the facility utilized Styrofoam containers for seven residents in their rooms for their meal trays. The facility…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-06-03 · tag F0851 — widespreadElectronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility reported a census of 43 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to electronically submit to Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) with complete and accurate direct staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data in a uniform format according to specifications established by CMS (i.e. Payroll Base Journal (PBJ), related to licensed nursing staffing information, when the facility failed to accurately report Registered Nurse (RN) coverage on 29 dates between January 1, 2023 and 09/30/23. Findings Included: - Review of the Payroll Base Journal (PBJ) Staffing Data Report for fiscal year (FY), Quarter 2 2023 (January 1-March 31) revealed a lack of Registered Nurse (RN) coverage for eight hours every 24 hours on the following dates: On 01/16 Monday (MO), On 01/23, MO, On 01/29, Sunday (SU), On 02/01, Wednesday (WE), On 02/05, SU, On 02/09, Thursday (TH), On 02/25, Saturday (SA), On 02/26, SU On 03/04, SA On 03/18, SA On 03/25, SA Review of the PBJ for FY, Quarter 3, 2023 (April 1- June 30),…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-06-03 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — widespreadSet up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility reported a census of 43 residents. Based on the observations, interview, and record review obtained on the current survey IKSC11 and its numerous findings of deficient practice including 5 Immediate Jeopardy citations which constituted Substandard Quality of Care, and with several of the deficient practice areas noted as repeat citations from the prior survey, the facility failed to demonstrate an effective Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) program. This failure affected all 43 residents of the facility and placed them at risk for a decreased quality of life, decreased quality of care, and continued resident to resident abuse. (See all citations associated with IKSC11). Findings Included: - During the first day of the onsite recertification survey, 05/28/24, the surveyors discovered 4 Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) concerns which were not identified by the facility. The surveyors issued IJ templates to the facility for hazardous hot water temperatures (See finding at F689), for lack of preventing continued resident-to-resident abuse (See finding at F600),…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-06-03 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 43 residents. Based on interview, observations, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an effective infection control program when laundry services failed to maintain a closed clean linen cart while delivering laundry, and further failed to maintain enhanced barrier precautions (infection control interventions designed to reduce transmission of resistant organisms which employs targeted gown and glove use during high contact cares) (EBP) when providing cares to a resident with a chronic wound. Findings included: - On 05/30/24 at 08:33 AM, observation revealed Laundry Aide X push a laundry cart down a hallway with the cover down, raised the cover, and delivered the laundry items to a resident's room, exited the room, performed hand hygiene. Laundry Aide X then delivered linens to a second resident's room and left the laundry cart in the hallway with a raised cover. Laundry Aide X stated they were unsure of whether or not linen carts were required to be covered when…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-03 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — patternHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility reported a census of 43 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure dignity in resident dining when the facility served seven residents their meals in Styrofoam containers, due to a lack of plates, cups, and flatware, for residents who chose to eat in their room. Findings included: - On 05/30/24 at 09:02 AM, observation revealed dietary staff delivered a multi-tiered cart with Styrofoam containers of food to each hall. The Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) on each hall then delivered each tray with styrofoam containers to the seven residents who chose to dine in their room. On 06/03/24 at 10:00 AM, Dietary Manager O stated that Styrofoam containers were used to deliver meals to the room prior to her hire, and she was in the process of ordering more plates, cups, and silverware to be able to provide actual plates and flatware to the residents who chose to eat in their rooms. Dietary Manager O stated there was an unknown supply chain problem with her supplier and they were having trouble obtaining enough plates for all of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-06-03 · tag F0641 — patternEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility census totaled 43 residents with 15 residents included in the sample. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to accurately complete the Minimum Data Set (MDS) for five sampled residents. Resident (R)1, related to hospice and medications on the Care Area Assessment (CAA), R30 related to accidents not addressed on the CAA, R32, related to dialysis and nutrition not addressed on the CAA, and R39, related to medications not addressed on section N on the MDS. These deficient practices had the potential to lead to uncommunicated need for care and services to meet each individual residents' needs. Findings included: - R1's electronic medical record (EMR) revealed the following diagnoses that included chronic atrial fibrillation (rapid, irregular heart beat), anxiety disorder (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty and irrational fear), violent behavior, major depressive disorder (major mood disorder which causes persistent feelings pf…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-03 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY - Resident (R) 3's Electronic Health Record (EHR) revealed diagnoses that included a pressure ulcer of right heel stage three (full thickness pressure injury extending through the skin into the tissue below), diabetes mellitus (DM-when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin made, or the body cannot respond to the insulin) and muscle weakness. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 15, indicating intact cognition. R3 required maximal assistance with activities of daily living (ADL's lower dressing). Total dependence for transfers and toileting. Partial to moderate assistance with wheelchair mobility, bed mobility, personal hygiene, bathing, and upper body dressing. R3 was incontinent of bowel and bladder. The Quarterly MDS dated 03/29/24, documented a BIMS of 15. No changes in ADL's. The Functional Abilities (Self-Care and Mobility) Care Area Assessment (CAA) dated 01/02/24, documented the resident required assistance with functional…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-03 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 43 residents with 15 residents sampled. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the right of R22's representative to be informed of changes, when the resident had an increase in behaviors and staff placed R22 on one-to-one observation due to his behaviors. Findings included: - Review of Resident (R)22's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed a diagnosis of dementia (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion) with behaviors. The Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented the staff assessment for cognition revealed R22 had severe cognitive impairment. The resident was independent with ambulation. The Cognitive Loss/Dementia Care Area Assessment (CAA), dated 02/16/24, documented the resident had cognitive loss related to dementia. The Behavioral CAA, dated 02/16/24, documented the resident had behavioral symptoms related to daily wandering. The Quarterly MDS, dated 05/17/24, documented…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-03 · tag F0637 — isolatedAssess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 43 residents with 15 residents included in the sample. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to recognize a significant change in a resident's physical condition and perform a comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment within the required 14-day period. This deficient practice had the potential to lead to uncommunicated needs and placed the resident at risk of further deterioration of his physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. (Resident (R) 30) Findings included: - R30's Electronic Health Record (EHR) included diagnoses of diabetes mellitus type 2 (DM2- when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin made or the body cannot respond to the insulin), metabolic encephalopathy (condition in which brain function is disturbed either temporarily or permanently due to different diseases or toxins in the body), dementia (a progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion), repeated falls, pain in [the] left hip…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-03 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 43. The sample included 15 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to revise the fall care plan with interventions for three residents. Resident (R)16, R24 and R30. This deficient practice placed all three residents at risk for impaired ability to achieve and/or maintain their highest practicable level of physical and emotional wellbeing due to uncommunicated care needs. Findings included: - R16's Electronic Health Record (EHR) revealed diagnoses of intermittent explosive disorder, bipolar disorder (major mental illness that caused people to have episodes of severe high and low moods), dementia (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion), and sexual dysfunction. The Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], documented staff completed an interview to determine the resident's cognition, which indicated he had moderately impaired cognition. No behaviors were noted on the assessment. R16 required…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-03 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 43 residents with 15 residents included in the sample. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide appropriate and timely Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) for one resident regarding untrimmed facial hair for one Resident (R)17. Findings included: - R17's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed diagnoses that included acute and subacute infective endocarditis (inflammation of the muscles of the heart), and dysphagia (swallowing difficulty) following cerebral infarction (CVA-stroke- sudden death of brain cells due to lack of oxygen caused by impaired blood flow to the brain by blockage or rupture of an artery to the brain). The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 08, indicating moderately impaired cognitive impairment. The resident required assistance of one staff with daily cares. The Activities of Daily Living (ADL Functional/ Rehabilitation Care Area Assessment (CAA)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-03 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility totaled 43 residents, with 15 included in the sample, and one resident reviewed for Hospice care. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide treatment and care in accordance with professional standards with the failure to coordinate resident care with hospice services. Findings included: - R1's electronic medical record (EMR) revealed the following diagnoses that included chronic atrial fibrillation (rapid, irregular heart beat), anxiety disorder (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty and intermittent explosive disorder, delusional disorder (untrue persistent belief or perception held by a person although evidence shows it was untrue) hypertension (elevated blood pressure), diabetes mellitus (DM-when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin made or the body cannot respond to the insulin), and hypothyroidism (condition characterized by decreased activity of the thyroid gland). The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-03 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 43 residents, which included 15 residents sampled, and one resident reviewed for Dialysis. Based on interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive person-centered care plan for Resident (R)32's related to hemodialysis (a procedure where impurities or wastes were removed from the blood) the resident received three times a week. This deficient practice had the potential to lead to uncommunicated needs regarding dialysis care which could lead to negative impacts on the resident's physical, mental and psychosocial well-being. Findings included: - R32's Electronic Health Record (EHR) included diagnoses of diabetes mellitus type 2 (DM2- when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin made or the body cannot respond to the insulin), anemia (a condition without enough healthy red blood cells to carry adequate oxygen to body tissues), stage four chronic kidney disease (CKD - a disease characterized by progressive damage and loss of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-03 · tag F0742 — isolatedProvide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with mental disorder or psychosocial adjustment difficulty, or who has a history of trauma and/or post-traumatic stress disorder.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 43 residents, with 15 residents in the sample, that included one resident reviewed for treatment/services/mental and psychosocial concerns. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide the necessary behavioral health care and services to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for Resident (R)39, who had a history of personal trauma and a diagnosis of post-traumatic stress disorder. This placed the resident at risk for impaired quality of life due to untreated and ongoing mental health concerns. Findings included: - Resident (R)39's Electronic Health Record (EHR) revealed diagnoses that included metabolic encephalopathy (broad term for any brain disease that alters brain function or structure), post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD a mental health condition that develops following a traumatic event characterized by intrusive thoughts about the incident, recurrent distress/anxiety, flashback and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-03 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility census totaled 43 residents with 15 residents included in the sample, that included five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow up on pharmacy recommendations in a timely manner for one Resident (R)1, regarding as needed lorazepam (a medication used for severe agitation) to obtain a new prescription every 14 days, to minimize or prevent adverse consequences related to medication therapy. Findings include: - R1's electronic medical record (EMR) revealed the following diagnoses that included chronic atrial fibrillation (rapid, irregular heart beat), anxiety disorder (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty and irrational fear), violent behavior, major depressive disorder (major mood disorder which causes persistent feelings pf sadness), intermittent explosive disorder, delusional disorder (untrue persistent belief or perception held by a person although evidence shows it was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-03 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility census totaled 43 residents with 15 residents included in the sample, that included five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure two Residents (R) 1, regarding as needed lorazepam (a medication used for severe agitation) and R24, regarding failure to monitor the use of an antipsychotic medication (medication used to treat psychosis). Findings include: - R1's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed the following diagnoses that included chronic atrial fibrillation (rapid, irregular heart beat), anxiety disorder (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty and irrational fear), violent behavior, major depressive disorder (major mood disorder which causes persistent feelings pf sadness), intermittent explosive disorder, delusional disorder (untrue persistent belief or perception held by a person although evidence shows it was untrue) and personality disorder. The admission Minimum Data…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-11-08 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility reported a census of 44 residents. Based on observation, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to store, prepare, and serve food under sanitary conditions for the residents of the facility. Findings included: - During the initial tour of the kitchen on 11/01/22 at 08:20 AM Dietary Staff BB stated that items in dry storage were to be used or discarded within 30 days after opening. Bulk storage of sugar and flower were usable for 60 days after opening. Items in the refrigerator were usable for 30 days after opening. Items in the freezer were usable for 60 days after opening. States that staff has been instructed to write the date received or opened on all food packages. An observation of the kitchen 11/01/22 at 08:22 AM revealed the following areas/items with concerns: 1. Eight hardened plastic cutting boards of various sizes all had deep gouges in the surface. One cutting board had dried food adhered to the surface. 2. A covered tub of cornbread muffins, on a wire rack in the kitchen, lacked a date. 3. In the side-by-side refrigerator in the kitchen Dietary…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-11-08 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility reported a census of 44, with 12 residents sampled. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to verify Resident (R)195's advanced directives (a legal document in which a person specified what actions should be taken for their health, which may or may not include a do not resuscitate [DNR-decision whether or not to withhold medical intervention in the even the resident's heart stops] order), Findings included: - Review of the Physician Orders in R195's Electronic Health Records (EHR) on 11/01/22 at 03:00 PM documented no DNR order. Further review of the resident's EHR home screen lacked any information regarding advanced directives or R195's DNR status. Review of the scanned documents in the EHR revealed a DNR order signed by R195's Durable Power of Attorney (DPOA) and witness but lacked a signature from the resident's physician. An interview with R195's DPOA on 11/02/22 at 02:20 PM, revealed the resident had a DNR and provided an unsigned paper copy of the DNR. An interview on 11/08/22 at 01:25 PM with Social Services Designee (SSD) X…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-11-08 · tag F0623 — isolatedProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility reported a census of 44 residents. The sample of 12 included two residents sampled for hospitalization. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to send a copy of the facility-initiated hospitalization transfer/discharge notice to the representative of the Office of the State Long- Term Care Ombudsman as required the two sampled residents, Resident (R)44 and R18 who discharged to the hospital. Findings included: - The Progress Notes dated 05/08/22 for R 44 revealed the resident went to the hospital for complaint of right wrist pain due to fall in the dining room. R44's medical record revealed the resident discharged to an Assisted Living facility, on 10/01/22 at 09:16 AM On 11/3/22 at 04:00 PM, interview with Social Service Staff X confirmed she did not transmit the resident's hospitalization notice to the Ombudsman from 09/01/22 to 10/19/22. Interview, on 11/3/22 at 04:42 PM, with Administrative Staff A indicated the SSD had not been aware that notification to the Ombudsman needed to be transported monthly which includes hospitalization…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-11-08 · tag F0636 — isolatedAssess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 44 with 12 residents sampled for review. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to complete a comprehensive assessment of the resident's functional capacity, within 14 days of admission, for one of the sampled residents Resident (R)145, to ensure the resident received required care assistance by the staff. Findings included: Resident (R )145's Electronic Health Record) (EHR) revealed the resident admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including aphasia, diastolic heart failure, COPD, GERD, MDD, and seizures. Further review of the EHR for the resident's Minimum Data Set Assessment, (MDS), revealed the admission of 10/14/22 and as of 11/1/22, staff failed to start a comprehensive admission assessment MDS for this resident. The areas on the form contained N/A indicating not applicable. The EHR documented that the resident had allergies listed as no known drug allergies and also had Black Box Warning (BBW) included per Federal Drug…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-11-08 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 44 residents with 12 selected for review. Based on interview and record review the facility failed to develop a baseline care plan within 48 hours of admission to the facility to include the instructions needed to provide effective and person-centered care of the resident that meet professional standards of quality care, for two of the 12 sampled Resident (R) 145 and R195, to ensure person centered cares provided by staff to the residents. Findings Include: - R145's pertinent diagnoses from the Electronic Health Record (EHR) documented: heart failure (a condition with low heart output and the body becomes congested with fluid), Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD progressive and irreversible condition characterized by diminished lung capacity and difficulty or discomfort in breathing), and seizures (violent involuntary series of contractions of a group of muscles). The resident admitted to the facility on [DATE]. On 11/02/22 at 09:09 AM staff enter R145's room and using…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-11-08 · tag F0661 — isolatedEnsure necessary information is communicated to the resident, and receiving health care provider at the time of a planned discharge.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 43 residents with 12 residents included in the sample, and one resident reviewed for discharge. Based on interview and record review the facility failed to document a recapitulation summary of the one sampled resident's stay upon discharge, Resident R 42. Findings included: - The Physician Orders dated 08/04/22 revealed the following diagnoses: chronic pain (persisting for a long period, often for the remainder of a person's life) and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (progressive and irreversible condition characterized by diminished lung capacity and difficulty or discomfort in breathing). The admission Minimal Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) with a score of 15 indicated intact cognition. R42 required the following assistance with Activities of Daily Living (ADL) total dependence with two or more person for bed mobility and transfers. Dressing, toilet use, and personal hygiene required total dependence with one person's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-11-08 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 44 residents. The 12 residents selected for review included two reviewed for personal hygiene care needs. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide necessary services to maintain good grooming for the two sampled Residents (R) 145 and R25. Findings Include: - R145's pertinent diagnoses from the Electronic Health Record (EHR) documented: heart failure (a condition with low heart output and the body becomes congested with fluid), Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD- progressive and irreversible condition characterized by diminished lung capacity and difficulty or discomfort in breathing) and seizures (violent involuntary series of contractions of a group of muscles). As of 11/01/22 the staff failed to start the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) for R145. As of 11/01/22 the staff failed to document the Care Plan for R145. The EHR documented R145 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The shower record in the EHR revealed staff assisted…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-11-08 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility reported a census of 44 residents with 12 residents in the sample. Based on observation, interviews, and record review the facility failed to monitor with weekly wound assessments as ordered for one sampled Resident R 18's, decubitus ulcer on the right and left ischial area (a bone that makes up the bottom of the pelvis). Findings included: - Review of the Physician Orders dated 08/15/22 revealed the following diagnoses: agitation (feeling of aggravation or restlessness brought on by a provocation or a medical condition), chronic pain syndrome (persisting for a long period, often for the remainder of a person's lifetime), depression (abnormal emotional state characterized by exaggerated feeling of sadness and emptiness), paraplegia (paralysis characterized by motor or sensory loss in the lower limbs and trunk). Review of the admission Minimum Data Set dated 01/10/22 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 which indicated intact cognition. The Activities of Daily Living (ADL) indicated R18 required total dependence with bed mobility, transfer and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-11-08 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility census was 44. The 12 residents sampled included one for smoking safety. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the one sampled Resident (R)32, remained as safe as possible from smoking accident hazards. Findings included: - R32's pertinent diagnoses from the Electronic Health Record (EHR) documented: schizoaffective disorder, bipolar type (a psychotic disorder characterized by gross distortion of reality, disturbances of language and communication and fragmentation of thought with severe high and low moods). The 07/22/22 Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14, indicating intact cognition. The resident required physical assistance of two or more persons for all activities of daily living (ADLs) except eating. The 10/27/21 Annual MDS documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, indicating intact cognition. The resident required physical assistance of two or more persons for all activities of daily living (ADLs) except eating. The 08/01/22 Care Plan…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-11-08 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility reported a census of 44 residents with 12 sampled including one reviewed for respiratory care. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure oxygen tubing stored in a sanitary manner for the one sampled Resident (R) 145, to prevent respiratory infections. Findings included: - R145's pertinent diagnoses from the Electronic Health Record (EHR) documented: heart failure (a condition with low heart output and the body becomes congested with fluid), Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD- progressive and irreversible condition characterized by diminished lung capacity and difficulty or discomfort in breathing) and seizures (violent involuntary series of contractions of a group of muscles). The EHR documented that R145 used oxygen. The EHR lacked instructions to change the oxygen tubing on a weekly basis. An observation on 11/02/22 at 09:09 AM, revealed R145 sitting up in her wheelchair. R145's oxygen (O2) tubing was coiled directly on the floor with the cannula hanging over the concentrator. Both the humidifier water bottle and the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-11-08 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility census totaled 44 residents, with 12 residents sampled, including five for unnecessary medications. Based on interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure adequate follow up on the consultant pharmacist recommendations related to medications for one of the five sampled residents, Resident (R) 26. This failure placed the resident at risk for adverse effects related to medication use. Findings include: - The Electronic Health Record (EHR) documented R26 had diagnoses of dementia (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion), urinary incontinence (involuntary passage of urine), and major depressive disorder (major mood disorder). The 12/11/21 Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 10, which indicated moderately impaired cognition. R26 had verbal behaviors towards others that interfered with care and activities, as well as disrupted privacy of others and the living environment. The assessment documented the use of an antidepressant medication daily in the seven-day look back…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2026-06-03 · tag F0577 — widespreadAllow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to post the results of the most recent surveys in a place readily accessible to residents, family members, and legal representatives of residents. Findings included:- On 06/01/26 and 06/02/26, observation revealed the facility lacked a readily accessible posting regarding where the most recent survey results could be found.On 06/02/26 at 12:20 PM, when asked where the most recent survey was, Nurse Consultant CC found the most recent survey in a black binder located on the front reception desk without a sign notifying residents, family members, and representatives where the results were located. Nurse Consultant CC stated the facility should have a sign to indicate where the survey results were located so residents, family members, or residents' representatives could view them.The facility's Survey Results, Examination of Policy, revised October 2021, documented copies of survey results are maintained in the administrative office. A copy of the most recent standard survey, including any subsequent extended…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$225,379 in federal fines across 4 penalties.
- $19,615 — penalty dated 2026-06-03
- $16,786 — penalty dated 2025-09-17
- $18,213 — penalty dated 2025-01-14
- $170,765 — penalty dated 2024-06-03
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to ADVENA LIVING COMMUNITIES — 6 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1 of 5 | 1.3 | -0.3 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 1 of 5 | 1.5 | -0.5 vs chain |
| Staffing | 1 of 5 | 2.0 | -1.0 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 2 of 5 | 1.7 | +0.3 vs chain |
The other 5 homes this chain runs (chain average 1.3★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCCUE, TAMARA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 05/01/2024 |
| NOVOTNY, MICHELLE | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 11/01/2019 |
| NOVOTNY, WILLIAM | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 11/01/2019 |
| REDDIG, ASHLEY | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 04/28/2025 |
| CORNERSTONE EMPLOYMENT SOLUTIONS INC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 11/01/2019 |
| NEW PARADIGM SOLUTIONS INC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 11/01/2019 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 8 rows in the source record cover these 6 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 81% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.1M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 23% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in KS
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Kansas Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 175454. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-06-03, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.