Claridge Court

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

56.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 205 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 65.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 103 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.59 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 88% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 10% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 45 beds and averages 38.6 residents a day — about 86% occupied, or roughly 6 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.63 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.17 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.69 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.91 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.92 on weekdays — 21% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 1.36 to 0.71 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 44% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

17 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 6 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2022-08-04 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — isolated
  Provide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 44 residents. The sample included 15 residents with two residents reviewed for dementia care. Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure staff provided person-centered care and services as related to dementia for Resident (R) 192. As a result, staff's inappropriate response to dementia-related behaviors resulted in a broken wrist for R192. Findings included: - R192 admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged on 06/24/22. The Electronic Medical Record (EMR) for R192 documented the following diagnoses: dementia with Lewy bodies (a type of progressive dementia that leads to a decline in thinking, reasoning and independent function), encephalopathy (damage or disease that affects the brain), major depressive disorder major mood disorder (a mental health disorder characterized by persistently depressed mood or loss of interest in activities, causing significant impairment in daily life), and Parkinson's disease (a chronic and progressive movement…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-14 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  The facility identified a census of 38 residents. The sample included 13, with two reviewed for accidents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to secure potentially hazardous kitchen equipment in a safe, locked area and out of reach of six cognitively impaired, independently mobile residents.Findings Included: - On 01/12/26 at 07:00 AM, a walkthrough of the facility revealed the hallway door to the kitchen was left fully open. An inspection of the interior kitchen revealed that both interior kitchen doors were left open. No staff were observed in the kitchen or the surrounding dining area. No residents were in or around the kitchen area at the time of observation, but had access to that area.An inspection of the sink area in the kitchen revealed an unsecured lock on a cabinet below the sink. The cabinet contained four spray bottles of all-purpose cleaner. The containers contained the warning, Keep out of reach of children, hazardous to humans, can cause eye irritation, harmful if swallowed.An inspection of the interior kitchen area revealed an…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-14 · tag F0628 — isolated
  Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 38 residents. The sample included 13 residents, with one resident reviewed for hospitalization. Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to provide a written notice of transfer/discharge as soon as practicable, and the facility also failed to provide a bed hold notice with the required information for Resident (R) 20. Findings included:- R20's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) from the Diagnosis tab documented diagnoses of quadriplegia (inability to move the arms, legs, and trunk of the body below the level of an associated injury to the spinal cord), major depressive disorder (major mood disorder that causes persistent feelings of sadness), and convulsions (involuntary series of contractions of a group of muscles).R20's EMR under the Progress Notes tab revealed the following facility-initiated transfer documentation:On 06/04/25 at 01:16 AM, an Alert Note documented R20 was transferred to the hospital. The facility lacked a Bed Hold Notice that included the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-14 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  The facility identified a census of 38 residents. The sample included 13 residents, with two reviewed for pressure ulcers (localized injuries to the skin and/or underlying tissue, usually over a bony prominence, caused by pressure, or pressure in combination with shear and/or friction). Based on interviews, observations, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R) 18's pressure-reducing interventions were implemented correctly when R18's low air-loss mattress (a specialized adjustable air mattress that reduces pressure applied to the body) was not set within her current weight range.Findings Included:- The Medical Diagnosis section within R18's Electronic Medical Records (EMR) included dementia (a progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory and confusion), type two diabetes mellitus (DM- when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin is made, or the body cannot respond to the insulin), muscle weakness, and chronic kidney disease.R18's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) completed 12/08/25 indicated a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS)…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2024-02-27 · tag F0730 — widespread
  Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  The facility had a census of 37 residents. The sample included 12 residents and five Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) reviewed for performance evaluations and required in-service training. Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure five of the five CNA staff reviewed had the required yearly performance evaluations completed. This placed the residents at risk for inadequate care. Findings included: - A review of the facility's performance evaluation records revealed the following: CNA P, hired on 03/11/19, no yearly performance evaluations were provided upon request. CNA Q, hired on 05/24/22, no yearly performance evaluations were provided upon request. CNA MM, hired on 04/13/21, no yearly performance evaluations were provided upon request. CNA NN, hired on 08/21/18, no yearly performance evaluations were provided upon request. CNA OO, hired on 09/11/01, no yearly performance evaluations were provided upon request. Review of the email communications regarding yearly merit increases, provided by the facility, to the five CNA staff reviewed for yearly evaluations…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2024-02-27 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  The facility identified a census of 37 residents. The facility had one kitchen and one kitchenette. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that food items were properly stored in a safe and sanitary manner after the original sealed package had been opened. The facility failed to ensure foods were labeled and dated after opening. This placed all residents who ate food from the facility at risk for food-borne illness. Findings included: - During the initial tour on 02/22/24 at 07:33 AM, observation revealed the following: Half of a brown cake in the small refrigerator was uncovered and not dated. Two bags of sausage lay on top of the cooking stove. A canister of sugar under the work prep table was not labeled or dated. A cooler with a see-through glass door revealed small bowls of lettuce, tomatoes, ham, cheese, onions, and a container of fish were not covered, and these items were not dated. Half of a bag of ravioli was open to the air in a small freezer and was not dated. Avocadoes and pea salad were not dated in the small side…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-27 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  The facility identified a census of 37. The sample included 12 residents with 12 reviewed for care plan revisions. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to revise Resident (R)7's Care Plan to reflect her implemented restorative services and goals. This deficient practice placed R7 at risk for impaired care due to uncommunicated care needs. Findings Included: - The Medical Diagnosis section within R7's Electronic Medical Records (EMR) included diagnoses of left-sided hemiparesis (weakness and paralysis on one side of the body), left-sided hemiplegia (paralysis of one side of the body), and left-hand contracture (abnormal permanent fixation of a joint or muscle). R7's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) completed 11/22/23 noted a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 indicating intact cognition. The MDS indicated she required substantial to maximal assistance with bed mobility, transfer bathing, toileting, personal hygiene, and dressing. The MDS noted she had an upper extremity impairment to one side and used a wheelchair for mobility.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-27 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  The facility identified a census of 37 residents. The sample included 12 residents with two reviewed for pressure ulcers (localized injury to the skin and/or underlying tissue usually over a bony prominence, because of pressure, or pressure in combination with shear and/or friction). Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to maintain Resident (R) 2's low air-loss mattress pump settings at the correct weight range. This placed R2 at increased risk for pressure ulcer development. Findings included: - R2's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented diagnoses of peripheral vascular disease (PVD- slow and progressive circulation disorder causing narrowing, blockage, or spasms in a blood vessel), difficulty in walking, generalized muscle weakness, congestive heart failure (CHF-a condition with low heart output and the body becomes congested with fluid), and cerebrovascular disease affecting right dominant side (group of conditions that affect the circulation of blood to the brain, causing limited or no blood flow to affected areas of the brain). The…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-27 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  The facility had a census of 104 residents. The sample included 23 residents with four residents reviewed for accidents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure an environment free from accident hazards when the facility failed to utilize wheelchair foot pedals while transporting Resident (R)18 and R22 around the facility. This deficient practice placed both residents at risk for preventable injuries and falls. Finding Included: - R18's Care Plan initiated 12/13/24 indicated he was at risk for falls related to his weakness, unsteadiness, poor safety awareness, and severe cognitive impairment. R22's Care Plan initiated 10/18/20 indicated she was at risk for falls related to poor gait/balance, muscle weakness, and severe cognitive impairment. On 02/26/24 at 07:20 AM R22 sat in her wheelchair in the hallway in front of the elevator. Certified Nurses Aid (CNA) M pushed R22 back to her room. R22's wheelchair had no foot pedals and her shoes drug on the floor as staff pushed her. On 02/26/24 at 11:32 AM CNA N pushed R18 (severely cognitively…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-02-27 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
  Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  The facility identified a census of 37 residents. The sample included 12 residents with five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure a pulse was assessed and documented consistently for Resident (R) 4's carvedilol (medication used to treat high blood pressure) for hypertension (HTN-elevated blood pressure) to monitor for efficacy and adverse effects. This placed R4 at increased risk for unnecessary medication administration and possible adverse side effects. Findings included: - The electronic medical record (EMR) for R4 documented diagnoses of chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia (occurs when the respiratory system cannot adequately provide oxygen to the body). HTN, ischemic cardiomyopathy (the heart's decreased ability to pump blood properly, due to myocardial damage), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD- a progressive and irreversible condition characterized by diminished lung capacity and difficulty or discomfort in breathing). The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-02-27 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
  Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  The facility had a census of 37 residents. The sample included 12 residents of which five were reviewed for unnecessary medications. Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to ensure a documented physician rationale which included the multiple unsuccessful attempts for nonpharmacological symptom management before starting Resident (R)14's Seroquel (antipsychotic- class of medications used to treat mental disorder characterized by a gross impairment in reality testing). This placed the resident at risk for unnecessary psychotropic (alters perception, mood, consciousness, cognition, or behavior) medications and related complications. Findings Included: - The Medical Diagnosis section within R14's Electronic Medical Records (EMR) included diagnoses of dementia (a progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, and confusion), major depressive disorder (major mood disorder), muscle weakness, and difficulty walking. R14's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) completed 01/18/23 noted a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) assessment could not be…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$18,028 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $18,028 — penalty dated 2024-04-16

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to LIFESPACE COMMUNITIES — 15 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $1.3M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in KS